Showing posts sorted by date for query ANTIFA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ANTIFA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, July 06, 2026

Trump Campaigns on Anti-Communism as Left Opponents Are Indicted

Monday 6 July 2026, by Dan La Botz



President Donald Trump in two different speeches celebrating Independence Day called upon Americans to celebrate July 4 by revering the nation’s history and rallying against “godless” communism. His speech was a clear response to the recent election to Congress of three members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) who ran as Democrats. He has made clear that he will characterize both the DSA members, other progressives, and the Democratic Party as “evil” communists, as he strives to reelect a Republican majority to Congress in November. [1]

At the same time, Trump’s Justice Department has indicted and convicted several leftist activists—opponents of ICE or supporters of Palestine— on felony charges resulting in them being sentenced to years and even decades in prison. The combination of the new anti-communist rhetoric and the increased repression of the left, under the guise that the government is fighting a domestic terrorist organization called antifa, suggest that we may be entering a new anti-communist era of repression such as those of the 1920s and 1950s. If so, the entire left will be in danger. And of course, it suggests we may be witnessing another step from authoritarianism to neofascism.

In his speeches, Trump stated more than once that the United States “is the greatest civilization in human history.” And communism, he said, “is the greatest threat to our country,” a greater threat than the two world wars and the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on New York and Washington, D.C.

There is now a resurgence of the communist menace in our land, including from newcomers to our country who embrace ideas totally opposed to our way of life and our great success…Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty.

Trump didn’t mention DSA, the left group actually winning elections but said instead that the problem was the Communist Party, “made up of illegal immigrants, criminals and everybody that doesn’t want to work.” In response, CPUSA Co-chair Rossana Cambron said, “MAGA [Trump’s Make America Great Again movement] is going to lose the midterms, and Trump’s getting desperate.”

Trump alleged that the Democratic Party had become Communist. “They are becoming a Communist party – not social democrats. They are core communists.”

There have been two previous Red Scares in the United States, one in the 1920s and the other in the 1950s. The first Red Scare was a result of the Russian Revolution of 1917 that brought the Communists to power, a wave of industrial strikes, and in 1919 a series of anarchist bombings. Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer organized raids that led to the arrest of 3,000 people and the deportation of hundreds. The movement was devastating to the Industrial Workers of the World, the Socialist Party, and the newly formed Communist Party.

The second Red Scare in the 1950 was driven in large part by Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who made claims of widespread Communist Party spies’ penetration of the U.S. State Department. McCarthy, who was chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations launched highly publicized investigations into alleged Communist infiltration of federal agencies, universities, and the U.S. Army. Some 500 people were called to testify and another several hundred before the House Un-American Activities Committee. Many people called before these committees lost their jobs or were evicted from their homes and were blacklisted. The Communist Party was virtually outlawed and CP leaders were imprisoned.

The previous two Red Scares strengthened right-wingers in both the Democratic and Republican Parties and drove many leftists underground or out of the movement. While we don’t know what Trump’s Red Scare will do, it has to be seen as a serious threat to the left, to the unions, and to the social movements.

5 July 2026

Footnotes

[1] Image By Democratic Socialists of America.

Saturday, July 04, 2026

Critics flip as Patriot Front militia marches on Washington for July 4th



Members of the group Patriot Front ride the metro as a commuter looks on, during the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2026. REUTERS/Cheney Orr
July 04, 2026 
ALTERNET


The white supremacist militia group, the "Patriot Front," has taken over the streets of Capitol Hill on the 250th birthday of the United States.

Videos show that a few hundred men showed up with face coverings, waving Confederate flags along with American flags, including some that were inverted. The front two men marching held metal red, white and blue shields.

According to George Washington University, “The group promotes an ultra-nationalist ideology centered on the idea of creating a white ethnostate in the United States, rejecting multiculturalism and diversity.”

One photo by a Reuters photographer showed the male-only group surrounding a Black woman on the metro as they filled the train car.

"Absolutely terrifying to have white supremacist hate group Patriot Front march through our streets today in Washington, DC. Their manifesto calls for a white ethnostate, excludes people of color from their definition of citizenship, and is deeply anti-Semitic and xenophobic," said human rights lawyer Mai El-Sadany.

At Union Station, the men gathered to call for "reclaiming the country and getting rid of immigrants," WTOP reporter Mitchell Miller said.

"These guys have such a popular message that they have to wear masks," quipped congressional reporter Jamie Dupree.

Ashley Murray, a senior DC reporter for States News, said that she asked a National Guard soldier who they were, and the soldier reported "protesters."

WUSA reporter Spencer Brooks was quick to correct those who thought that the marchers were Proud Boys. He said that in his experience, "they show up, march around in high visibility areas, then leave via metro or even U-Haul trucks."

One political site commented, "About 100 Patriot Front nazis showed up near the Mall in DC this morning, marched around aimlessly for about half an hour, got virtually no attention, then got on the Metro and went home..."

Democratic activist recalled Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who previously spread the conspiracy theory that the "Patriot Front" would "disappear immediately after we confirm Kash Patel" to lead the FBI. "What a coincidence that'll be." The comment was made on January 25, 2025. The conspiracy theory is that the militia was secretly FBI members trying to scare people. They remain a real group.

Twitter/X owner Elon Musk then perpetuated the conspiracy theory throughout 2024. He claimed that it was obviously a front group or psyop because police didn't remove the masks when they were arrested, reported Forbes after the protest. Those formally arrested were photographed by police without masks and Musk's social media site fact-checked his own post.



Lawyers remain in disbelief over ‘fascist Hellscape’ July 4 display in DC

Olivia Rosane,
 Common Dreams
July 4, 2026 


A member of the group Patriot Front gestures outside the Eastern Market metro station, on the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2026. REUTERS/Nathan Howard TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Hundreds of members of the white nationalist hate group Patriot Front descended on Washington DC Saturday morning as the nation’s capital prepared to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

Members of the group, wearing masks and carrying Confederate and US flags, rode the DC metro and marched around parts of Capitol Hill before departing the city by train, as WUSA reported. Beyond the march itself, no other incidents were reported connected to the group.

“What kind of fascist hellscape is [happening] on Pennsylvania Ave at the Eastern Market Metro stop?” Georgetown Law professor Josh Chafetz wrote on Bluesky upon spotting the group.

Chafetz said the group appeared to be all white and all male.




“Absolutely terrifying to have white supremacist hate group Patriot Front march through our streets today in Washington, DC,” human rights lawyer Mai El-Sadany wrote on social media. “Their manifesto calls for a white ethnostate, excludes people of color from their definition of citizenship, and is deeply antisemitic and xenophobic.”

In one video shared by WTOP reporter Mitchell Miller, members of the group stood in a line outside DC’s Union Station chanting, “Life, liberty, victory” and “Reclaim America.”



According to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Patriot Front split from Vanguard America after the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, at which white supremacist James Alex Fields Jr. drove his car into counterprotesters, killing anti-racist activist Heather Heyer and injuring 35 others.

“Patriot Front is an image-obsessed organization that rehabilitated the explicitly fascist agenda of Vanguard America with garish patriotism. Patriot Front focuses on theatrical rhetoric and activism that can be easily distributed as propaganda for its chapters across the country,” SPLC explains.

The group believes that democracy no longer functions and wants to transform the US into a “pan-European” ethnostate that excludes both citizens of color and new immigrants and refugees.

One image from a Reuters photographer shows the masked Patriot Front marchers standing around a Black woman sitting on the DC Metro.

“This image is from today. A Black woman sits on the DC metro as masked white nationalists prepare to march on our nation’s capital. This is America’s 250th anniversary,” attorney Aaron Parnas posted on social media.



Melanie D’Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, blasted the group for carrying Confederate flags and embracing fascism while claiming the mantle of US patriotism.

“You have no right to call yourself a ‘[patriot]’ while carrying the flag of one of America’s enemies, and claiming victory on behalf of the ideology that fueled another—both of which the US defeated,” D’Arrigo wrote on social media.

Fox News host’s response to white supremacist rally leaves ex-GOP lawmaker floored

Alexander Willis
July 4, 2026 
RAW STORY

A commuter sits as members of the group Patriot Front stand at the Eastern Market metro station, on the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2026. REUTERS/Nathan Howard


As dozens of masked men from the white nationalist group Patriot Front marched in the nation’s capital Saturday, Fox News host Laura Ingraham floated a theory in an apparent attempt to distance the GOP from the neo-fascist march, a theory that left one former Republican lawmaker floored.

On Saturday afternoon, journalist and writer Richie McGinniss uploaded a video of himself questioning people who appear to be members of Patriot Front standing in front of the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C.

Despite there being countless reports by reputable news outlets on Patriot Front’s march through the nation’s capital, Ingraham floated a bizarre theory regarding McGinniss’ video.

“I call fake,” reads a social media post on X published Saturday by Ingraham’s account, responding to the video published by McGinniss “Looks more like Antifa in costume. No one should be allowed to cover their faces.”

Adam Kinzinger, a former GOP U.S. House member from Illinois, issued Ingraham a blistering rebuke.

“Yes of course. Fake. That's the only defense you have to this?” Kinzinger wrote Saturday in a social media post on X. “How about condemning it?”

Billy Ray, a notable film director and screenwriter, also issued Ingraham a fierce response.

“Laura, why is it so scary for you to admit that this exists amid your party – and your audience?” Ray asked in a social media post published on X Saturday. “If you were an actual journalist, you’d have to.”





Thursday, July 02, 2026

Minnesota Activists Prepare to Defend Anti-ICE Protesters From Federal Charges

Critics say the indictments against 15 people aim to intimidate and silence dissent against the Trump administration.
July 1, 2026

Demonstrators march during the nationwide "Stop ICE Terror" rally through downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 20, 2026.ROBERTO SCHMIDT / AFP via Getty Images

Minnesota activists and scholars are decrying the recent federal indictment of 15 people who took part in demonstrations against the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities metro region earlier this year.

The indictment accuses the protesters of surveilling federal agents, disrupting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, and training people on how to delay or prevent arrests, among other allegations. It also alleges that the defendants are members of antifa-linked groups like the Black Cat Worker’s Collective, which prosecutors describe as an organization committed to “militant class struggle” and “revolution.” According to the indictment, “militant class struggle” includes activities such as “digital campaigning, community organizing, and physical confrontation.”

The defendants include a college professor, a union carpenter, a health care worker, a special education teacher, union members, and community organizers.

Civil rights attorney and activist Nekima Levy Armstrong told Truthout that the defendants are being targeted for exercising their constitutional rights to protest and assemble. She called the charges “farcical” and part of “a familiar pattern where the federal government is hell-bent on punishing protesters and those who speak out against the authoritarianism and fascism of the Trump administration.”

The defendants include a college professor, a union carpenter, a health care worker, a special education teacher, union members, and community organizers.

Armstrong herself faces a separate federal charge stemming from an anti-ICE protest inside a church during a Sunday service in January. The Department of Justice, which called the protest a violation of religious freedom, has charged her and more than three dozen others for allegedly carrying out a “coordinated takeover-style attack” on Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. However, video clips of the event appear to show activists peacefully chanting “Justice for Renee Good” and “ICE Out” as they protested what they viewed as a glaring contradiction: One of the church’s pastors, David Easterwood, was both preaching the Gospel and allegedly serving as acting director of a local ICE field office.

Others who were charged along with Armstrong include local journalist Georgia Fort and former CNN journalist Don Lemon, both of whom were at the church covering the protest.

But in recent weeks, federal prosecutors have dismissed or reduced dozens of charges against indicted protesters. At least 15 cases have been dropped entirely, while others — including that of Isabel “Isa” Lopez — have been downgraded from felonies to misdemeanors. Last week, attorneys for Armstrong and 32 other co-defendants asked a federal judge to dismiss charges tied to the church demonstration, arguing that the indictment does not “allege a single fact that any defendant used physical force against another person, issued a threat of violence to anyone, or fully blocked ingress to or egress from the church, as is required by the charged statutes.”

David Schultz, a political science professor at Hamline University in Minnesota, told Truthout that the charges against the 15 anti-ICE protesters reflect what he sees as a broader campaign against Donald Trump’s political opponents. The charges, Schultz said in an email, resemble the Trump administration’s allegations against prominent national leaders, including Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and former FBI Director James Comey.

“The pattern is to use the machinery of government to intimidate individuals, even when the legal basis for the investigations appears weak or nonexistent … The objective is often less about obtaining convictions than about intimidation and harassment.”

“The pattern is to use the machinery of government to intimidate individuals, even when the legal basis for the investigations appears weak or nonexistent,” Schultz said. “The objective is often less about obtaining convictions than about intimidation and harassment.”

JaNaé Bates Imari, executive director of Faith in Minnesota, a faith-based political grassroots organizing group, echoed Schultz’s sentiment, noting that the indictment was indeed aimed at intimidating protesters whose only crime was peacefully confronting immigration agents who, in the nation’s largest crackdown, pursued immigrants and refugees — including naturalized citizens and permanent residents — across the city.

The defendants, Imari told Truthout, have been criminalized for “blowing whistles and showing up when their neighbors are being kidnapped, and for writing down license plates of people who are doing the kidnapping.”

Imari’s Faith in Minnesota is one of 50 organizations — including religious, labor, and other groups — that issued a statement condemning the indictment of the protesters. “When self-serving politicians are losing, they lie, lash out and attempt political repression,” the statement reads in part. “They will do whatever it takes to seize and hold power, including trying to silence our voices and keep us from voting.”

Similar organizations, affiliate groups, and individual supporters have already taken steps to defend the indicted protesters in various ways. People have turned out in large numbers at defendants’ court appearances to show solidarity. Legal organizations, including the Minnesota chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, have provided legal representation. Thousands of individuals have so far raised over $342,000 in legal funds.


People have turned out in large numbers at defendants’ court appearances to show solidarity. Thousands of individuals have so far raised over $342,000 in legal funds.

The cases in Minnesota come amid a broader national pattern of ICE protest prosecutions. Recently, federal judges sentenced eight activists for participating in an anti-ICE noise demonstration in Texas. Prosecutors claimed that the protesters had links to antifa, which the Trump administration labeled as a domestic terrorist group. One of them, Benjamin Song, who was convicted of firing shots and injuring a police officer during the protest, received a 100-year prison sentence. Song argued that he acted to prevent police brutality and pointed out in a statement that while he opposed fascism, he was not a member of an antifa group because antifa is not an actual organization. The others received sentences ranging from 30 to 70 years.

In Minnesota, the indictment of the 15 anti-ICE protesters mainly revolves around digital communications and planning related to organizing demonstrations; it does not accuse the defendants of causing physical harm to agents. “Peaceful protest is protected by the First Amendment, and discussions about how to organize and conduct those protests are likewise protected,” Schultz said. “Those activities generally fall squarely within the rights of free speech and assembly.”

Whatever the case, Minnesotans continue to exercise their rights to protest and assemble despite the federal government’s crackdown on protesters in the state and across the country.

This became clear, Armstrong said, at the initial court appearance for the defendants. Supporters filled the largest courtroom in St. Paul to capacity, she said, with many more waiting outside. “So, it just shows that people are resilient, that people see what is going on in these attempts to silence our voices and to intimidate us,” Armstrong added. “They are refusing to capitulate to Donald Trump, even knowing that there may be consequences at the hands of this president and his administration.”

This is not the first time that a U.S. government — local, state, or federal — has used its power to pursue dissent. In recent years, pro-Palestinian and Black Lives Matter protesters on college campuses and in the streets have faced harsh punishment at the hands of law enforcement and the courts, reflecting a pattern seen throughout U.S. history.

“Historically, conspiracy charges have frequently been used against progressive organizations and movements in the United States,” Schultz said. “Labor unions, socialists, and members of the Communist Party were all, at various times, prosecuted under conspiracy theories in efforts to suppress their political activities. Over time, the courts repeatedly recognized that much of this conduct constituted protected speech and protected political association under the First Amendment.”

This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Ibrahim Hirsi
Ibrahim Hirsi is a Minneapolis-based journalist and historian covering immigration, politics, and racial justice. His work has appeared in The Nation, Dissent, MinnPost, and elsewhere.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

Show Trial: 

A Punishment For Solidarity Itself



The 1938 Trial of the Twenty-One in Moscow was the last of the show trials of prominent Bolsheviks during Stalin’s bloody Great Purge
Photo by Fine Art Images/Heritage Images/Getty Images
Show Trial: A Punishment For Solidarity Itself


Abby Zimet
Jun 25, 2026
Further


In an act deemed “going apeshit against enemies of the Reich,” two judges just levied brutal prison sentences of 30 to 100 years, a combined penance of 450 years, on eight anti-ICE members of a scary if imaginary “North Texas Antifa cell” convicted of terrorist-abetting “crimes” like protesting, lighting fireworks and moving a box of zines. The case, widely seen as a test of regime efforts to criminalize dissent or any unwelcome speech, moved one defendant to muse, “What kind of people are not against fascism?”

The grievous injustice against the group, dubbed The Prairieland Defendants for the ICE concentration camp they were protesting, comes amidst almost daily court victories elsewhere against the regime. Last week, three key rulings in federal district courts saw judges strike down administration election meddling, abuses against immigrants and, in a blistering 29-page decision, “blatantly unlawful and unethical use” of a grand-jury subpoena targeting Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. To date, there have been at least 272 wins against Trump, several from judges he appointed; after one especially irksome loss, Stephen Goebbels memorably whined, “Judge Sparkle (sic) decrees that America belongs to any random alien on Planet Earth.”




‘New Red Scare’: ICE Protester Gets 30 Years for Leftist Zines Under Trump Antifa Decree



Faced with mounting losses in other endeavors - wars, pools, polls - more regime lackeys are also getting testy. Newly back from having a baby but still hyper-toxic, Press Barbie went on Hannity to shriek about “deranged leftists desecrating our federal monuments” with algae: “Only the Democrats could hate beautifying our Capitol.” Of six people arrested for “vandalism” - more than for raping minors - many are “longtime donors to the Democrat Party,” who “completely destroyed our country,” also to “Barack Hussein Obama” and, gasp, ACTBlue. With fear-mongering truly all they’ve got, Hannity joined in on Dem “radicals...You’ve got Mr. Nazi Tattoo Platner, and six-gender, God-is-non-binary Talarico, and Pocahontas, and Mamdani...”

Amidst a “rolling coup“ in an increasingly fascist America, where threats from the left have always loomed larger than on the right and today’s despots cling frantically to a power they somehow know is illegitimate, it’s little wonder principled citizens protesting vulnerable brown people being locked up in concentration camps have become ”the new Red Scare.“ It’s helpful to remember that everything earlier autocrats did - Hitler, Stalin, Pinochet - was legal; they just changed the rules to do it. ”This is Soviet shit,“ wrote one observer, summoning the terror of Stalin’s staged show trials in the 1930s to eliminate most of Lenin’s staff and other ”saboteurs,“ from Bukharin to, via pickaxe, Trotsky exiled in Mexico; in the end, only ”Stalin the Executioner“ remained.

The “legal,” in Trump’s case, was last year’s menacing national security directive “NSPM-7: Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” which explicitly declared a fictional Antifa - in fact any American who opposes fascism, supports the rule of law and uses their First Amendment rights to defend it - a “MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION” and “SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER,” whether “it exists or not.” Prairieland, the first case successfully brought under NSPM-7, tests the state’s ability to quell dissent by perceived “enemies,” and could shape a future playbook for using the Antifa label - and “creative and highly theoretical claims by the state” - as “a catchall designation to criminalize activists writ large.”



The surreal sentences inflicted this week on eight mostly non-violent Prairieland activists came three months after their convictions on terrorism and other charges stemming from last year’s July 4 protest at the for-profit Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas. The action began as a noise demonstration, a typically safe, festive event where fireworks are set off “to remind people inside they are not forgotten.” That day, it devolved into vandalism - of cars, a guard shack, a security camera - by several protesters. Some brought guns - a red flag to many activists, but common in open-carry Texas where queer or trans people can face armed counter-protesters. When one cop drew his weapon, a protester in the nearby woods shot him in the shoulder.

At trial, eight defendants - Autumn Hill, Zachary Evetts, Benjamin Hanil Song, Savanna Batten, Meagan Morris, Maricela Rueda, Elizabeth Soto, and Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada - were convicted of rioting and explosive charges, and “providing material support to terrorists.” They are much like protesters anywhere: teachers, engineers, tattoo artists, animal-lovers, anti-ICE advocates, parents, straight, queer, trans, vegan. Some had organized the action together, some produced anarchist zines and belonged to a book club named for anarchist Emma Goldman, who 99 years ago this month was arrested on conspiracy charges for organizing against the First World War draft; some were members of a Socialist gun club; some weren’t even at the protest.

From the outset, the regime played hardball. The DOJ called them “members of a North Texas Antifa cell”; the indictment said Antifa “is a militant enterprise made up of networks of individuals and small groups primarily ascribed to a revolutionary anarchist or autonomous Marxist ideology.” They were held on multimillion-dollar bonds in squalid jail cells, denied medical care, frequently strip-searched; two trans women were held - unsafely, illegally - in men’s facilities. State agents ransacked homes, detained children, used flash-bang grenades to intimidate, went after anyone in their political orbit, often unearthing new charges. It was, one defendant said, “a nightmare made real...seeing the prosecution jump from lie to lie,” abuse to abuse.

The case became a sinister “laboratory“ where constitutionally protected free speech and civil disobedience became ”rioting“ and solidarity became ”conspiracy.“ Fireworks were ”explosives,“ a home where friends gathered a ”staging area,“ black clothing and the use of encrypted Signal a way ”to aid and abet those engaged in illegal acts.“ A home printer became ”a printing press“ producing ”insurrectionary materials“ - anti-fascist zines, handouts of ”8 Things You Can Do To Stop ICE,“ packets of vegetable seeds, poems, patches, bumper stickers of swastikas X-ed out and ”Zines Are Not A Crime.“ A teacher had home-made first aid kits he used to bring to school in case of a shooting; feds used their presence as evidence protesters had planned violence.

The shocking sentencing hearings were held by two judges, one each appointed by Bush and Trump, in two Fort Worth courtrooms. They were inexplicably scheduled even before either judge heard long-filed motions to overturn convictions in a trial, lawyers argued, “saturated with evidence designed to evoke fear, political bias, and guilt by association” and widely deemed “untethered from credible evidence or witness testimony.” Prosecutors folded into the case people who didn’t help plan the protest, weren’t there, or left when police asked them to. An attorney for Hill cited no evidence they believed in violence; Hill was so conscientious they stayed after the fireworks went off to pick up trash left behind; she still got a 50-year sentence.

The case ostensibly centered on the alleged attempted murder of the cop shot in the shoulder. Marine Corps reservist Benjamin “Champagne” Song said they were in the woods and fired “a warning shot” to distract the cop when he drew his gun on another protester; citing Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Song said, “I never want to see good people, standing for what they believe in, gunned down.” Song charges the state is imposing “collective punishment, guilt by association” on other activists, and the facts of the shooting remain unclear; feds first said there were multiple shooters and rounds fired, then said they have no medical records from the hospital where the cop was reportedly quickly released. Still, Song was given a 100-year sentence.

Batten, Evetts, Hill, Morris, and Soto each got 50 years for rioting, providing support to terrorists, and conspiracy to use an explosive ie: attending a loud protest. Said Soto, trying to laugh, “I guess they didn’t like my book club.” Rueda was sentenced to 70 years for also conspiring to “conceal documents” by asking her husband Sanchez-Estrada, not at the protest, to remove a box of zines from their house. “Being guilty of possessing literature is a concept fundamentally incompatible with a free society,” said one advocate. “We don’t need a constitutional right to possess only what the government likes.” Sanchez-Estrada got a 30-year sentence for moving the box. “I am a father, a husband, a teacher, a poet,” he told the judge. “I am many things, Your Honor, but I am not a terrorist.”

Many observers noted all the sentences were far harsher than those handed down to Jan. 6 rioters - who were then pardoned - or even the longest sentences for murder or rape - this, though prosecutors offered almost no evidence of the alleged crimes. And despite their obsession with the lethal threat posed by imaginary Antifa forces, even the judges questioned the need to mention “antifa” to jurors, who in turn seemed to reject Judge Reed O’Connor’s narrative of “an ambush” and “assault on democracy” by acquitting everyone but Song of attempted murder. One legal expert said that fortuitous rejection underscored how easily prosecutors can fashion or twist the law to create a “conspiracy”; said one attorney, “People should be scared.”

In total, 22 people have been charged in connection with the Prairieland protest. Five others took plea deals, another five have state charges pending, three more were indicted last month. Regime lackeys have gleefully touted their rare victory, with a hyperbolic DOJ press release blaring, “Leader of Antifa Cell Members Sentenced to 100 Years in Prison for Terrorist Attack on ICE Facility.” After the trial, Pam Bondi gloated they’d taken down “Antifa” - repeated 16 times - to “finally halt their violence on America’s streets.” After sentencing, Todd Blanche celebrated the regime’s “swift and uncompromising justice.” Of villainous Antifa, he crowed, “Their violent extremism has no place in our country,” presumably because only the fascist kind does.

As young activists mull lives stolen - and tenuously bank on appeals or pardons - their family, friends, supporters voice horror at “the absolute travesty” of the lies that led to their convictions and sentences. “We’ve fallen so far so fast it’s nose-bleed inducing,” said one. Another insisted, “The outcome of this trial is not the end. It is the beginning.” Autumn Hill’s wife Lydia Koza said she is “livid in the face of this grotesque distortion of anything that could ever have called itself due process...There is no ‘appropriate’ sentence for a wholly fictitious crime.” On their loved ones “being thrown away for the rest of their lives,” one noted the regime’s own actions “have proved the righteousness of their actions...This sentencing is a punishment for solidarity itself.”

Finally, from Flying Penguin, a grim reminder the Prairieland fates mirror that of too many in a nation and world whose history is rife with ‘other righteous “crimes”: BLM protesters, Black Panthers, AIM activists, civil rights marchers, union workers, “your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” To wit: “Today’s news is Andrew Jackson, ordering Congress to criminalize antislavery speech. Today’s news is Stalin’s Article 58, where ‘anti-Soviet agitation’ was a crime that meant whatever it needed to. Today’s news is the McCarthy-era ruling that upheld the conviction of Americans for organizing and teaching political theory.Today’s news is South Africa’s 1967 Terrorism Act, making terrorism anything that endangers ‘law and order.’ Today’s news is Trump and a white police state.” Warns Sanchez-Estrada, “People need to be aware - it’s not just the defendants on trial.”




Defendants clockwise from top left: Estrada-Sanchez; Song and Gibson; Hill and Koza; Batten; Sanchez; Elizabeth and Ines Soto; Morris and HillComposite Image from Dallas-Fort Worth Support Committee