Thursday, June 05, 2025

WhaleSETI: 

Curious humpback whales approach humans and blow bubble “smoke” rings

Newly documented behavior in a recently published paper by SETI Institute and UC Davis team members may offer insights into nonhuman intelligence—and help shape the search for life beyond Earth



SETI Institute

Bubble-ring-created-by-a-humpback-whale-named-Thorn-PR-6-5-2025 

image: 

Bubble ring created by a humpback whale named Thorn.

view more 

Credit: © Dan Knaub, The Video Company





June 5, 2025, Mountain View, CA -- A team of scientists from the SETI Institute and the University of California at Davis documented, for the first time, humpback whales producing large bubble rings, like a human smoker blowing smoke rings, during friendly interactions with humans. This previously little studied behavior may represent play or communication. Humpback whales are already known for using bubbles to corral prey and creating bubble trails and bursts when competing to escort a female whale. These new observations show humpback whales producing bubble rings during friendly encounters with humans. This finding contributes to the WhaleSETI team’s broader goal of studying non-human intelligence to aid in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

“Because of current limitations on technology, an important assumption of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence is that extraterrestrial intelligence and life will be interested in making contact and so target human receivers,” said Dr. Laurance Doyle, SETI Institute scientist and co-author on the paper. “This important assumption is certainly supported by the independent evolution of curious behavior in humpback whales.”

“Humpback whales live in complex societies, are acoustically diverse, use bubble tools and assist other species being harassed by predators,” said co-lead author Dr. Fred Sharpe, UC Davis Affiliate. “Now, akin to a candidate signal, we show they are blowing bubble rings in our direction in an apparent attempt to playfully interact, observe our response, and/or engage in some form of communication.”

“Humpback whales often exhibit inquisitive, friendly behavior towards boats and human swimmers,” said co-lead author Jodi Frediani, marine wildlife photographer and U.C. Davis Affiliate. “We’ve now located a dozen whales from populations around the world, the majority of which have voluntarily approached boats and swimmers blowing bubble rings during these episodes of curious behavior.”

The team’s findings were recently published in Marine Mammal Science in a paper titled “Humpback Whales Blow Poloidal Vortex Bubble Rings.” The study analyzes 12 bubble ring–production episodes involving 39 rings made by 11 individual whales.

Similar to studying Antarctica or other terrestrial analogs as a proxy for Mars, the Whale-SETI team is studying intelligent, non-terrestrial (aquatic), nonhuman communication systems to develop filters that aid in parsing cosmic signals for signs of extraterrestrial life. As noted by Karen Pryor, “patterns of bubble production in cetaceans constitute a mode of communication not available to terrestrial mammals” (Pryor 1990).

Other team members and coauthors of the paper are Dr. Josephine Hubbard (Postdoc, U.C. Davis), Doug Perrine (Doug Perrine Photography), Simon Hilbourne (Marine Research Facility, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia), Dr. Joy Reidenberg (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY) and Dr. Brenda McCowan, ( U.C. Davis, Veterinary Medicine), with specialties in animal intelligences, photography and behavior of humpback whales, whale anatomy, and the use of AI in parsing animal communication, respectively. An earlier paper by the team was published in the journal, PeerJ, entitled, “Interactive Bioacoustic Playback as a Tool for Detecting and Exploring Nonhuman Intelligence: “Conversing” with an Alaskan Humpback Whale.” The authors would like to acknowledge the Templeton Foundation Diverse Intelligences Program for financial support of this work.

For more information, visit WhaleSETI.

The paper is available here: Humpback Whales Blow Poloidal Vortex Bubble Rings.

The team previously published a paper on humpback whale communication here: Interactive bioacoustics playback as a tool for detecting and exploroing nonhuman intelligence: “conversing” with an Alaskan humpback whale.

About the SETI Institute
Founded in 1984, the SETI Institute is a non-profit, multi-disciplinary research and education organization whose mission is to lead humanity’s quest to understand the origins and prevalence of life and intelligence in the universe and share that knowledge with the world. Our research encompasses the physical and biological sciences and leverages data analytics, machine learning, and advanced signal detection technologies. The SETI Institute is a distinguished research partner for industry, academia, and government agencies, including NASA and the National Science Foundation.


Composite image of at least one bubble ring from each episode.

Credit

Journal

DOI

Article Title

UN-backed global research shows benefits of tracking ocean giants for marine conservation



WHOI researchers part of collaborative, international effort to increase Marine Protected Areas and other strategies




Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Shark 

image: 

A team of international scientists, including from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, have tracked over 100 marine megafauna species, identifying the most critical locations in our global oceans for better marine conservation efforts, and the establishment of effective Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)

view more 

Credit: (Photo by Ryan Daly)




Woods Hole, Mass. (June 5, 2025) -- A team of international scientists, including from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, have tracked over 100 marine megafauna species, identifying the most critical locations in our global oceans for better marine conservation efforts, and the establishment of effective Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), according to new research published in Science.

The global UN-endorsed research project, MegaMove, involves almost 400 scientists from over 50 countries, showing where protection could be implemented specifically for the conservation of marine megafauna. Current Marine Protection Areas include only 8 per cent of the world’s total oceans, which the UN High Seas Treaty seeks to expand to 30 per cent.

The research found that the targets of the current Treaty which have been signed by 115 countries but still to be ratified, are a step in the right direction. These will be key to assisting conservation but insufficient to cover all critical areas used by threatened marine megafauna, suggesting that additional threat mitigation measures are also needed.

Some of the ocean’s best-known creatures – known as marine megafauna – include sharks, whales, turtles, and seals. They are typically top predators with critical roles in marine food webs, but face growing threats from humans’ environmental impact.

“The impacts of a changing ocean on marine megafauna are already evident,” said Camrin Braun, assistant scientist and ocean ecologist at WHOI, and a co-author of the study. “Our recent work tracking marine predators, including an earlier WHOI-led study, indicates changes in the ocean are expected to fundamentally alter the status quo for where these species are and how they live.”

Simon Thorrold is a senior scientist in biology at WHOI, and a co-author on the study. “Conservation and management efforts need to plan for ongoing changes in ocean ecosystems. Bringing together data from hundreds of scientists is a really effective way to collectively address the international protections needed for these important species.”

The Australian National University (ANU) marine ecologist and research lead author, Associate Professor Ana Sequeira, said the study’s goal is to identify areas used by marine megafauna for important behaviors like foraging and corridors used for migration, and these areas can only be identified by tracking animal movements.

“We found that the areas used by these animals overlap significantly with threats like fishing, shipping, warming temperatures, and plastic pollution,” she said. “The 30 per cent protection goal is seen as helpful but insufficient to protect all important areas, meaning that additional mitigation strategies are needed to alleviate pressures beyond areas that will be protected.”

The research also links to UN Sustainable Development Goals, Goal 14 on water, and specifically, to Goal A of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework to halt human-induced extinction of threatened species.

Sequeira is the research director and founder of MegaMove, a global scientific project she launched in 2020. “MegaMove brings together an international network of researchers to provide innovative research to advance the global conservation of marine megafauna.”

“Our research shows that, in addition to protected areas, implementing mitigation strategies like changing fishing gear, using different lights in nets, and traffic schemes for ships will be key to alleviating current human pressure on these species,” she added.

Study co-lead author Dr Jorge Rodríguez, from Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos, added: “We’ve outlined the top areas for 30 per cent protection, ranking them based on their use by marine megafauna species. Our analysis identifies which areas in the global ocean these species are using as residencies or migratory corridors. We specifically focused on ranking higher those areas used for these important behaviors by the largest number of species.

“But the bottom line is, even if the whole 30 per cent protection were selected in key areas used by marine megafauna, it would still not be enough to conserve them,” Associate Professor Sequeira added.

“Adaptive management approaches, and stronger mitigation strategies are critical components of the coordinated international approach necessary to conserve these species into the future,” added Braun. “We need all the tools we can if we are going to successfully balance conservation goals with human uses in a changing ocean.”

About Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution is a private, non-profit organization on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, dedicated to marine research, engineering, and higher education. Established in 1930, its primary mission is to understand the ocean and its interaction with the Earth as a whole, and to communicate an understanding of the ocean’s role in the changing global environment. Top scientists, engineers, and students collaborate on more than 800 concurrent projects worldwide—both above and below the waves—pushing the boundaries of knowledge and possibility. 

  

As a member of the Marine Predators Group, WHOI assistant scientist Camrin Braun attaches satellite tags to sharks to track the movements and behavior of sharks. Braun has tracked sharks traveling as far as 10,000 miles and diving more than 3,000 feet.

Credit

(Photo credit: Tane Sinclair-Taylor)

Scientists argue for more FDA oversight of healthcare AI tools



PLOS






An agile, transparent, and ethics-driven oversight system is needed for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to balance innovation with patient safety when it comes to artificial intelligence-driven medical technologies. That is the takeaway from a new report issued to the FDA, published this week in the open-access journal PLOS Medicine by Leo Celi of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and colleagues.

 Artificial intelligence is becoming a powerful force in healthcare, helping doctors diagnose diseases, monitor patients, and even recommend treatments. Unlike traditional medical devices, many AI tools continue to learn and change after they’ve been approved, meaning their behavior can shift in unpredictable ways once they’re in use.

 In the new paper, Celi and his colleagues argue that the FDA’s current system is not set up to keep tabs on these post-approval changes. Their analysis calls for stronger rules around transparency and bias, especially to protect vulnerable populations. If an algorithm is trained mostly on data from one group of people, it may make mistakes when used with others. The authors recommend that developers be required to share information about how their AI models were trained and tested, and that the FDA involve patients and community advocates more directly in decision-making. They also suggest practical fixes, including creating public data repositories to track how AI performs in the real world, offering tax incentives for companies that follow ethical practices, and training medical students to critically evaluate AI tools.

 “This work has the potential to drive real-world impact by prompting the FDA to rethink existing oversight mechanisms for AI-enabled medical technologies. We advocate for a patient-centered, risk-aware, and continuously adaptive regulatory approach—one that ensures AI remains an asset to clinical practice without compromising safety or exacerbating healthcare disparities,” the authors say.

#####

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Digital Health: https://plos.io/3HgQkja

Citation: Abulibdeh R, Celi LA, Sejdić E (2025) The illusion of safety: A report to the FDA on AI healthcare product approvals. PLOS Digit Health 4(6): e0000866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000866

Author Countries: Canada, United States

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.