Rice researchers replicating Edison’s 1879 light bulb experiments show graphene may have an been unintentional byproduct
Rice University
image:
James Tour, the T.T. and W.F. Chao Professor of Chemistry at Rice University
view moreCredit: Rice University
What do Thomas Edison and 2010 Nobel Prize in physics winners Konstantin Novoselov and Andre Geim have in common? According to a recent publication from the lab of Rice University’s James Tour, it could be graphene — an answer that might have confused Edison, who died almost 20 years before physicist P.R. Wallace proposed such a substance could exist and nearly 80 years before Novoselov and Geim were awarded a Nobel Prize for isolating and characterizing it.
Graphene is a transparent, remarkably strong substance, as thin as a single atom and useful in a number of modern applications like semiconductors. One type of graphene, called turbostratic graphene, can be produced by applying a voltage across a resistant carbon-based material and rapidly heating it to 2,000-3,000 degrees Celsius.
In modern terms, that method is called flash Joule heating. But for Edison in 1879, the method available to him was simply turning on one of his newly patented, stable light bulbs. Unlike modern incandescent light bulbs that rely on tungsten filaments, early versions often used resistant carbon-based filaments like Japanese bamboo. Flipping a switch applied a voltage that rapidly heated the filaments, producing light. Or, perhaps, graphene. It depends on the century.
“I was developing ways to mass produce graphene with readily available and affordable materials,” explains Lucas Eddy, first author on the paper and a former Rice graduate student in Tour’s lab. “I was looking at everything from arc welders, which were more efficient than anything I’d ever built, to lightning struck trees, which were complete dead ends.” But then, as his lab mate put it, he had a light bulb moment. “I was trying to figure out the smallest, easiest piece of equipment you could use for flash Joule heating, and I remembered that early light bulbs often used carbon-based filaments.”
Why Edison’s light bulbs? Unlike many other early light bulbs, Edison’s patented design reached the critical 2,000-degree Celsius temperature. As a bonus, Edison’s 1879 patent gave Eddy a precise blueprint to work from when replicating the experiment.
Eddy’s first few attempts to procure an Edison-style light bulb proved unsuccessful with “carbon” filaments turning out to be tungsten in disguise. “You can’t fool a chemist,” laughs Eddy. “But I finally found a small art store in New York City selling artisan Edison-style light bulbs.” The artisan light bulbs were exactly like Edison’s, down to the Japanese bamboo filaments. Even the diameters of the filaments were close with Eddy’s filaments measuring only 5 micrometers larger than Edison’s.
Just like Edison, Eddy attached the light bulb to a 110-volt DC electricity source. He flipped the switch on for only 20 seconds. Longer periods of heating, he explains, can result in graphite forming rather than graphene.
The modern lenses of an optical microscope, a tool centuries older than Edison, showed the carbon filament had gone from a dark gray to a “lustrous silver.” A transformation had likely occurred, but to what?
To characterize the change, Eddy reached for a technique developed in the 1930s: Raman spectroscopy. This technique uses lasers to identify the substances through their atomic signatures, like reading a barcode. Advances over the last century allow it to do so with rather extreme precision. The spectroscopy confirmed what Eddy had hoped — parts of the filament had turned into turbostratic graphene. Edison, in his quest to develop a practical light bulb that could be used in everyday life, may just have produced a substance that is quickly becoming key to the technology-dependent 21st century.
Of course, there is no way to know what really happened with Edison’s long-ago experiment. Even if the original light bulb Edison used was available to analyze, any graphene produced likely would have turned to graphite during its first 13-hour test.
“To reproduce what Thomas Edison did, with the tools and knowledge we have now, is very exciting,” said Tour, the T.T. and W.F. Chao Professor of Chemistry and corresponding author on the paper. “Finding that he could have produced graphene inspires curiosity about what other information lies buried in historical experiments. What questions would our scientific forefathers ask if they could join us in the lab today? What questions can we answer when we revisit their work through a modern lens?”
The research was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-22-1-0526, J.M.T.), the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (W912HZ-21-2-0050 and W912HZ-24-2-0027, J.M.T.), and the Welch Foundation (C-2065-20210327, Y.H.) The content in this press release is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of funding organizations and institutions.
Journal
ACS Nano
Method of Research
Experimental study
Subject of Research
Not applicable
Article Title
Evidence for Graphene Formation in Thomas Edison’s 1879 Carbon Filament Experiments
Article Publication Date
6-Jan-2026
No comments:
Post a Comment