Monday, June 09, 2025

 

Global bottom-up initiative takes off to map 80% of chronic disease: All health stakeholders herald a new era in diagnosis, prevention & treatment





Exposome Moonshot





Washington, D.C., June 2025: In a defining moment for global public health and the fight against chronic disease, more than 350 leading scientists, policy makers, ethicists, journalists and civil society representatives from over 50 countries and 150 major organizations gathered at the inaugural Human Exposome Moonshot Forum[1]. What is expected by participants to be seen, in-time, as a historic event, this Washington, D.C. gathering marks the formal launch of a bold and globally coordinated, bottom-up initiative to map the physical, chemical, biological and psychosocial exposures that people experience during their lifetime. Known as the "exposome" experts agree that these influences account for over 80% of chronic disease today. As Professor Thomas Hartung of Johns Hopkins University, Member of the Organizing Committee and the Forum’s Host stated: “We are not promising a rocket launch to a ready destination. We are building the launchpad. The exposome is not the rocket, it is the moon. Each new data point, each discovery, is a step towards that distant but vital world where prevention replaces reaction and science empowers health.”

Why the Exposome, Why Now?

Completed in 2003, the Human Genome Project (HGP) was an international scientific research initiative that successfully mapped and sequenced all the genes in the human genome. At a cost of $3 billion, the HGP paved the way for unparallelled advances in medicine and biotechnology. According to a Batelle study, by 2010, mapping the genome had already created an economic impact of $965 billion, personal income exceeding $293 billion and 4.3 million job-years of employment, and counting. Advocates of the Human Exposome Project (HEP), anticipate similar economic benefit. Their main argument is that genes are responsible for only 3-5% of disease, our exposures are responsible for upwards of 80%. Chronic diseases including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory conditions, and neurodevelopmental disorders stem from environmental, occupational and lifestyle factors rather than genetic inheritance alone. 

Professor Gary Miller of Columbia University, one of the pioneers of exposome research and an Organizing Committee Member stated that: “The genome gave us one piece of the puzzle. The exposome completes the picture. It marks an unprecedented step-change in how the world views understanding what can harm us and fighting disease.” 

Prof. Miller also highlighted a recent landmark paper in the journal Science outlining how exposomics must be integrated into the biomedical research enterprise. “Life exists at the interface of our genetically encoded processes and our environmentally driven realities,” the article states, “so too should the research that seeks to understand it.[2] He added that: “We aim to match the Human Genome Project in its scope and ambition. We can develop while running and benefit from interim profits. The convergence of advanced technologies from Artificial Intelligence and advanced sensors, to metabolomics and big data analytics, makes this the perfect moment for action.

From Moonshots to Market: Innovation and Investment

The exposome initiative is not only about public health, it is also an innovation driver as well as an economic engine. From environmental diagnostics to personalized exposure profiling, the tools being developed are already generating a wave of start-ups, new therapeutics and digital health applications. For example, A.I.-driven analytics, geospatial mapping, environmental sensoring and high-throughput mass spectrometry are just some examples of the exposome project’s technological foundations. A common theme throughout the three-day forum was an urgent call for venture capital, philanthropic engagement and partnerships with tech firms and insurance companies to quickly scale-up implementation.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is an active backer of the initiative, placing representatives of multiple institutes on the Organizing Committee, including its Office of Strategic Initiatives

Acting NIH Deputy Director Nicole Kleinstreuer, Member of the Organizing Committee, announced a novel initiative during the Forum: “NIH is developing a Real-World Data Platform, a bold and transformative infrastructure that will link clinical, genomic, behavioral, and environmental data at scale. Integrating the exposome into the Real-World Data Platform is not just a technical challenge, it’s a scientific imperative.” 

Answering this call, this exposome announcement is timed to integrate and compliment ongoing research projects worldwide. From a recent Department of Defense report calling for the US to be more exposome-driven, Cancer Moonshot initiatives, the EU’s Green DealOne HealthToxic Free Europe or heightened scientific journal interest, it is clear that research efforts, funding and policy-making are all pointing in the same direction: we need to urgently map the human exposome. 

Positive effects are already in-play. The D.C. forum itself has been a catalyst for unprecedented cooperation between exposomics researchers. For example, the Network for Exposomics in the United States (NEXUS), The International Human Exposome Network(IHEN) and the pan-European Research Infrastructure (EnvIRonmental Exposure assessmeNt in Europe, EIRENE), are joining forces and reaching out to others to get a solid framework started. 

The Washington Declaration & Emerging Roadmap

The Forum culminated in the unveiling of the Washington Declaration[3], a shared global commitment to advancing exposomics as a scientific discipline, policy priority, and public health imperative. Spearheaded by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in partnership with major academic centers and projects in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the U.S., the initiative seeks to position exposome science on par with genomics in its capacity to transform biomedical research, public health and healthcare delivery. Its common message is a call for the reassessment of science to enable real transformative change. Acknowledging difficulties in the current international cooperation landscape, the Declaration sets out why joint action is all the more necessary today and cannot be held captive by independent and shifting funding cycles. 

Critically though, the organizers of the Forum and the Declaration that followed are committed to public participation, input, and interest. For this reason, the same Declaration signed by leaders in biotechnical innovation, AI experts, and NIH directors is being shared with the broader public for signing and support. For members of the public who would like to sign on to this call to catalogue the exposome and dramatically improve public health, the organizers of the initiative encourage them to visit exposomemoonshot.org and click “Sign the Declaration”. Signatories will not only be supporting the future of this transformational public health and biomedical effort but will also have the opportunity to seek out greater involvement by being added to a growing community of supporters receive regular updates and news of new opportunities related to the Exposome Forum.

To reiterate this need for change, the Forum’s Welcome Address was given by Sir Peter Gluckman, former Chief Science Adviser to the Prime Minister of New Zealand and current President of the International Science Council (ISC)

Sir Peter stressed his personal conviction that this Moonshot is a must-do for science, for policy and for society: “As a scientist who spent most of my professional career studying how the environment influences early human development, both in the fetal and neonatal period, for long-term outcomes on metabolism, body composition and brain development, for the last 30 years, we have focused much of our attention on the genotype and not sufficiently on those environmental and developmental factors that ultimately determine how we will live our lives.” 

Sir Peter added that: “The epigenetic tools, the metabolomic tools, the AI and computational tools are at our fingertips. This Moonshot is a once in a lifetime opportunity to bring together the technologies, computation, ethics and public values to power a truly comprehensive, unifying and bottom-up endeavor. I am confident that there are enough street-smart scientists, clinicians, technologists and organisations in our world to roll up their sleeves to help us understand how we have changed the environment we live in and what that is doing to our lives and to the lives of our children and their children.” 

Key Outcomes, Endorsements & Activities Ahead

The Forum deliberately avoided the format of a traditional symposium, opting instead for a dynamic, participatory workshop structure. This allowed attendees to shape the initiative’s scientific, policy, and funding roadmap in real time. Examples of concrete outcomes include:  

  • Living Labs & Citizen Science: reaffirming the centrality of citizen engagement. Participants explored living labs, co-designed monitoring networks and mobile coaching tools to bring exposome awareness into everyday life. 

 

Professor Denis Sarigiannis, President of the National Hellenic Research Foundation (Greece) & Member of the Organizing Committee stated that: “Exposome science cannot be done without the people … They know their own environments better than we do.

 

Sir Jeremy Farrar, Chief Scientist & Deputy Director-General, World Health Organization stated that: “If it’s a real moonshot … it’s about inspiring people, lifting their eyes beyond today’s news and saying the world can be better … that’s what is behind this project.”

 

  • Global Research Infrastructure: The European Exposome Infrastructure known as EIRENE is recognized as a major player in the field and is fully on-board with the Human Exposome Project’s Moonshot Launch. Backed by 17 EU governments and initiated under the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI), it is projected to receive over €1 billion in combined national and EU-level investments with about €250 million already spent on exposome research.
  • Embedded Ethics & Governance: Lessons learned from critiques of previous large-scale genomics efforts were front and center throughout the meeting. Going forward, participants argued and agreed that all exposome research must be anticipatory, inclusive, transparent and reflexive. The goals of exposome research from its standards and its tools, to how it studies humans and the consequences of its products, will fully embrace “ethical parallel research.”[4]
  • Open Science & FAIR Data[5]: This emerging global collective commits to making all its tools, data and findings openly available in accordance with FAIR principles: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. For example, the newly launched European Exposome Map[6] part of the FAIR program of IHEN, offering sub-100-meter environmental exposure data across the EU from 2000 to 2020, is already online as a proof of principle.
  • Multi-Omic & AI Integration: Mass spectrometry, geospatial imaging and wearable biosensors will be integrated with transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic data. These high-resolution datasets will be fused using machine learning models to uncover previously invisible links between exposures and health outcomes.

In the U.S. the Network for Exposomics in the U.S. (NEXUS) will help coordinate NIH efforts. In Europe, political backing for the International Human Exposome Network (IHEN) and EIRENE is already enshrined in the intergovernmental agreements of more than a dozen countries. 

During the Forum, a number of governments pledged both institutional support and discussions towards co-investment. For example, South Africa was the first to nominate a National Exposome Contact Person and to invite the Exposome Moonshot Forum Community to host a follow-up meeting during the 10th edition of Science Forum South Africa (SFSA) to be held in Pretoria in late November, 2025[7]

Prof. Rémi Quirion, Chief Scientist of Quebec and current President of the International Network for Governmental Science Advice (INGSA), organized the high-level exposome policy panel alongside the WHO, UNESCO and the African Academy of Sciences. He stated that: “… the Moonshot Human Exposome Project, it’s huge… we’re willing to help … a very stimulating program … it will change the way we do business in the future.”  

Post-forum Prof. Quirion volunteered to be the National Exposome Contact Person for Quebec and Canada. Similarly, Denis Naughten, former Government of Ireland Minister & former Chair of the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s Working Group on Science & Technology volunteered to act as a roaming ambassador for the Human Exposome Project

Further endorsements included Dr Ana Persic (UNESCO) who stated that: “It really is an exciting meeting, because the possible impact and implications of a project like that really are global … The message that needs to come from this project is that it will help solve some of the biggest health issues that the populations across the world are facing today” and Prof. Peggy Oti-Boateng (President, African Academy of Sciences) who asked for inclusion: “The African Academy of Sciences … is open to this new dynamic … open arms. We want to collaborate.” 

Numerous congratulations and firm requests to be involved have been received from a broad array of public health activists, international institutions and private individuals[8]. These include past and present elected officials and ministers, science advisers, diplomats, ethical lawyers & professors, and the talking-heads of major science-led public institutions such as the International Science Council, the Global Commission on Drug Policy and various science journalist associations. These statements capture unanimous, high-level backing and stress the need to act now and to get this right for science and for global health . 

Fenna Sillé, Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins and Principal Organizer of the Forum, underscored the unprecedented global reach of the initiative. Delegates came from six continents, including robust participation from the ‘Global South’. She stated that: “The Exposome Moonshot is not a Western project. It is an intercontinental project that demands intercontinental participation.” 

As Daan du Toit, Deputy Director General, Government of South African put it: “Understanding and fighting chronic disease is in everyone’s interest, whether you live in Pretoria or Philadelphia.” 

Theresa Scavenius, Member of the Danish Parliament stated: “We need a unified and integrated approach, which includes regulatory science and political mobilization … I believe the Human Exposome Project will extend and further accelerate an integrated understanding of human health and environment.”

Professor Roel Vermeulen of Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Member of the Organizing Committee & Coordinator of the EU initiated International Human Exposome Network (IHEN) authored a recent report on the future of Exposome research for the European Parliament[9].  He stated that: “What makes exposomics urgent and distinctive is its discovery-based approach. Rather than starting with one specific hypothesis, researchers use new tools and big data to generate new hypotheses and uncover hidden connections between our environment and health - patterns we might not even think to look for … Such a shift is not only necessary to reduce the growing burden on healthcare systems, but also vital for building a healthier, more economically resilient and socially competitive populations.”

The Critical Role of Science Journalism & Public Engagement

Perhaps the overriding, take-home message of the Moonshot Launch was that unless you get the public on-board early, you fail. How to engage the citizen on the ground, also to influence their elected officials, was a constant theme throughout the conference. From the Opening Keynote to the Closing Ceremony, many speakers, delegates and online participants argued that Public Engagement ought to be the number one pillar of the Exposome Roadmap. 

Similarly, during a technical briefing given to science reporters, questions were raised about ethical oversight, public understanding and equitable access to the results of the human exposome mapping exercise. As stakeholders themselves, media fed-in as advice that lessons must be learnt from failures to properly communicate GMO’s, vaccines, Stem Cell research etc.  

In response, the organizers pledged to move early to help train science reporters on the ins and outs of exposomic science. The Conference Director of the World Conference of Science Journalists Dec. 2025, Pretoria[10] has since invited them to take part in their conference. In parallel, both parties are exploring ways and means to potentially fund media grants and are committed to promoting exposome research as a journalistic field in its own right.    

What Comes Next? 

Organizers are now synthesizing the dozens of breakout reports, roundtable notes and public comments submitted throughout the event into actionable roadmaps to reflect regional priorities, local capacities and disease burdens. For example, tailored implementation plans will need to be developed for urban vs. rural environments, low-income vs. high-income countries, and different demographic groups. This effort will build on and align with existing in-country and regional activities, while aiming to bring a true global dimension. The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing is playing a key role in supporting and facilitating this coordination, alongside contributions from other international partners. Together, they call on all interested parties, public and private, to sign the Washington Declaration, join the community and build a true movement.  Follow-up meetings are already planned in Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Japan & South Africa in 2025. A second Moonshot Forum will be hosted by IHEN and EIRENE in Barcelona, Spain in 2026. 

Further information: Eliza Cole (ecole28@jh.edu)

 


[1] https://exposomemoonshot.org

[2] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adr0544

[3] https://exposomemoonshot.org/washington-d-c-declaration-on-the-human-exposome/

[4] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37745046/

[5] https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/

[6] https://www.humanexposome.eu/2022/09/14/exposome-maps/

[7] www.sfsa.co.za

[8] https://exposomemoonshot.org/endorsements/

[9] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/en/document/EPRS_STU(2025)765791

[10] https://www.wcsj2025.org

 

Protecting peppers from devastating viral diseases through gene pyramiding


Researchers combine different resistance genes to make pepper plants remarkably more resilient against begomovirus infections



Kindai University

Gene pyramiding protects pepper plants from begomoviruses 

image: 

These images show how plants with both pepy-1 and Pepy-2 genes can tolerate challenging viral infections much better than plants with only one or none of these resistance genes.

view more 

Credit: Associate Professor Sota Koeda from Kindai University, Japan




Even with today’s advanced agricultural technologies, plant diseases can still be extremely devastating to crops, causing billions of dollars in losses worldwide every year. Begomoviruses represent a prominent example of this threat—these whitefly-transmitted pathogens cause yellow leaf curl disease in peppers and can destroy up to 100% of fruit yield in affected fields across Asia, Africa, and the Americas.

Breeding crops that are resistant to begomoviruses has long been the most effective and widely used strategy for preventing such massive losses. Though usually effective, this approach has serious limitations, especially when dealing with mixed infections. Scientists have successfully identified resistance genes against specific begomovirus species, but developing broad-spectrum protection for the complex mixtures of viruses commonly found in agricultural settings has proven far more difficult.

 

Fortunately, a research team led by Associate Professor Sota Koeda from the Graduate School of Agriculture at Kindai University, Japan, has recently made an important breakthrough in addressing this challenge. Their latest study, published online in the journal Plant Disease on June 2, 2025, demonstrates how combining two different resistance genes can provide robust protection against even the most virulent begomovirus combinations. This work was co-authored by Ms. Mika Onouchi, Ms. Namiko Mori, and Ms. Nadya Syafira Pohan, all from Kindai University.

The team focused on two previously identified resistance genes: recessive pepy-1, which encodes a protein called Pelota involved in cellular quality control mechanisms, and dominant Pepy-2, which encodes an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that helps plants silence viral genes. Using sophisticated inoculation techniques, the researchers tested pepper plants carrying these genes against single virus infections and mixed infections with highly virulent begomoviruses from different regions of the world.

Their experiments revealed that while individual resistance genes provided some protection, they were often overwhelmed by mixed infections—particularly when plants faced simultaneous attack by New World begomoviruses like the pepper huasteco yellow vein virus and the pepper golden mosaic virus. However, when both resistance genes were combined in their most potent form (the homozygous state), the resulting plants showed remarkable resilience.

Through careful analysis and further experimentation, the team delved deeper into the different resistance mechanisms at play. While pepy-1 showed effectiveness against Old World begomoviruses, it struggled with New World species. Pepy-2, on the other hand, provided broader protection. Most importantly, their combination created a synergistic effect known as ‘gene pyramiding’ that overcame the limitations of each gene. This drastically reduced disease symptoms and kept viral DNA accumulation at low levels, leading to plants achieving low disease severity scores.

For pepper growers, this research offers hope for more stable production in regions where begomovirus diseases have been economically devastating.  “Our study provides a framework for breeding peppers with durable resistance to evolving begomoviruses, filling a critical gap in sustainable crop protection,” explains Dr. Koeda, “Both pepy-1 and Pepy-2 will be used widely in commercial pepper cultivars in the near future, enabling farmers to produce pepper fruits even under begomovirus-infected conditions.”

 

This breakthrough comes at a critical time, as global pepper production faces increasing pressure from viral diseases. With over 42 million tons of peppers produced annually worldwide, protecting this valuable crop from devastating losses is essential for food security and economic stability in major producing regions, such as Mexico, Indonesia, Turkey, and India. The development of durable, multi-pathogen resistance strategies represents a significant step forward in sustainable agriculture.

Worth noting, the implications of this study extend beyond peppers. The gene pyramiding technique represents a powerful strategy that could be applied to other plants facing viral pathogens. “This approach we developed for peppers can be applied to other crops, and we are now challenging this goal in other vegetables,” says Dr. Koeda.

 

Further research efforts on this complex topic will hopefully help us minimize the damage to crops caused by viral plant diseases.

 

Effects of psilocybin on religious and spiritual attitudes and behaviors in clergy from major world religions




Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News
Psychedelic Medicine 

image: 

 

The first peer-reviewed journal to publish original research papers on every aspect of psychedelic medicine including basic science, clinical, and translational research.

view more 

Credit: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.





A new study in the peer-reviewed journal Psychedelic Medicine showed that psilocybin administration in a sample of clergy from major world religions increased multiple domains of overall psychological well-being, including positive changes in religious attitudes and behavior as well as effectiveness in their vocation as a religious leader. Click here to read the article now.

The late Roland Griffiths, of Johns Hopkins University, along with Stephen Ross and Anthony Bossis, from New York University Grossman School of Medicine, and coauthors, compared a control group of participants to psychedelic-naïve clergy from various major world religions who received two psilocybin sessions: 20 and then 20 or 30 mg/70 kg about 1 month later.

Compared to the control group, “participants who had received psilocybin reported significantly greater positive changes in their religious practices, attitudes about their religions, and effectiveness as a religious leader, as well as in their non-religious attitudes, moods, and behavior,” reported the investigators. “Follow-up assessments showed that positive changes in religious and non-religious attitudes and behavior were sustained through 16 months after the second psilocybin session.”

Participants rated at least one of their psilocybin experiences to be among the top 5 most spiritually significant (96%), profoundly sacred (92%), psychologically insightful (83%), and psychologically meaningful (79%) of their lives.

About the Journal
Psychedelic Medicine is the first peer-reviewed journal to publish original research papers on every aspect of psychedelic medicine, including basic science, clinical, and translational research, as well as medical applications. This journal provides a vital resource for clinicians and patients alike who are invested in the potential efficacy of psychedelic drugs currently undergoing research in preclinical and clinical studies as an alternative or supplement to traditionally manufactured pharmaceuticals to treat depression, anxiety, addiction, demoralization, and other mental health conditions. Visit the Psychedelic Medicine website to learn more.

About Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., a Sage Company
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. is a global media company dedicated to publishing and delivering impactful peer-reviewed research in biotechnology & life sciences, specialized clinical medicine, public health and policy, and technology & engineering. Since its founding in 1980, the company has focused on providing critical insights and content that empower researchers and clinicians worldwide to drive innovation and discovery.


WALL STREET Democrats are drawing closer to the crypto industry despite Trump divisions


By The Associated Press
 June 09, 2025 

An advertisement for the cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, is displayed on a building in Hong Kong on Nov. 18, 2021. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung, File)

WASHINGTON — As U.S. President Donald Trump builds a crypto empire — including hosting a private dinner with top investors at his golf club — Democrats have united in condemning what they call blatant corruption from the White House.

But the Democratic Party’s own relationship with the emerging crypto industry is far less cut and dried.

Work in the Republican-led Senate to legitimize cryptocurrency by adding guardrails has drawn backing from some Democrats, underscoring growing support for the industry in the party. But divisions have opened over the bill, with many demanding it prevent the Republican president and his family from directly profiting from cryptocurrency.

“I’m all on board with the idea of regulating crypto,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. “But at this moment, when cryptocurrency is being so clearly used by Donald Trump to facilitate his corruption, I don’t think you can close your eyes to that when you’re legislating.”

The legislation is moving ahead more rapidly than Congress usually acts when an industry is new. But the big money and campaign donations flowing from cryptocurrency firms have made them a new powerhouse on the political scene, one that’s increasingly gaining allies and capturing the attention of lawmakers.


A look at what to know about the industry’s clout and the political fight over what’s known as the GENIUS Act:
‘Anti-crypto is a good way to end your career’

To understand the growing clout of the crypto industry, look no further than the 2024 election. Fairshake, a crypto super political action committee, and its affiliated PACs spent more than US$130 million in congressional races.

Fairshake spent roughly $40 million supporting Republican Bernie Moreno in Ohio in an effort to defeat Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. Brown, who lost to Moreno by more than 3 percentage points, was seen as a chief critic of the industry as the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.

“DC received a clear message that being anti-crypto is a good way to end your career, as it doesn’t represent the will of the voters,” Brian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, wrote in a social media post the day after the 2024 election.

Coinbase — the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. and biggest contributor to Fairshake — does not view support for its industry as partisan, according to Kara Calvert, the company’s vice president of U.S. policy. The industry also spent heavily to support Democrats Ruben Gallego and Elissa Slotkin in their races for open Senate seats in battleground states.

Fairshake spent $10 million in support of Slotkin during her successful Senate run against Republican Mike Rodgers, and Slotkin, who won the Michigan race by fewer than 20,000 votes, spoke in favor of crypto on the campaign trail.

Similar dynamics are setting up ahead of 2026 in contested House and Senate races. Fairshake said in January that it already had $116 million in cash on hand aimed at the 2026 midterm elections.

“We’re not slowing down, and everything remains on the table,” Josh Vlasto, a spokesperson for Fairshake, told The Associated Press.

Hours before a May 19 vote to move forward on cryptocurrency legislation in the Senate, an advocacy group tied to Coinbase sent an email to the offices of U.S. senators warning that the vote would count toward their crypto-friendliness scores.

“What the spending does is put crypto on the map. It lets members know that this is not a phase, this is real industry, with real dollars, that is developing its hold in Washington,” said Calvert.

Democrats navigate around a ‘crypto president’

A significant number of Democrats, 16, joined Republicans in advancing the crypto legislation. The GENIUS Act would create a new regulatory structure for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. It is viewed as a step toward consumer protections and greater legitimacy for the industry.

The sticking point for many Democrats is that while the bill prohibits members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins, it excludes the president from those restrictions.

Trump, once a skeptic of the industry, has vowed in his second term to make the U.S. the global capital of crypto. Meanwhile, he and his family have moved aggressively into nearly every corner of the industry: mining operations, billion-dollar bitcoin purchases, a newly minted stablecoin and a Trump-branded meme coin.

Days after Trump’s interests in the industry became public in early May, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York urged the Democratic caucus to unite and vote against the package to have a stronger hand in negotiations, according to a person familiar with the matter who insisted on anonymity to discuss private discussions.

On May 8, a bloc of Senate Democrats who had previously backed the GENIUS Act reversed course — ultimately voting to block the bill from advancing. Negotiations between Senate Democrats and Republicans followed.

The new version of the bill is now expected to pass the 100-member Senate this month. Amendments are still possible. Schumer and Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. are expected to propose one that would bar the president and his family from profiting off stablecoins, though it’s unlikely to pass.

“There is room for improvements as there often is with a lot of legislation. But with this in particular, we’ve got issues with the president,” said Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona “Having said that, this was negotiated with Democrats and Republicans. We got to a place. We voted on it. I expect this is the version we’re going to pass.”

Still, the legislation is stirring unease. Schumer, asked if he’s urging members to vote against the bill, noted that he has opposed the legislation and said “there’s division in our caucus on that issue.”

“There’s a gaping hole in this bill that everybody sees,” Murphy said. ”After it’s passed, it will be illegal for me to issue a cryptocurrency, but it’s legal for the president of the United States.”

“If this bill passes, we kind of go from a dirt road to a paved road,” he said.
What comes next

If the Senate approves the stablecoin legislation, the bill will still need to clear the House before reaching the president’s desk.

Crypto advocates say the next priority is pushing Congress for market structure legislation, a far more sweeping effort than simply regulating stablecoins.

“Stablecoin is one step of the path. Then you need market structure. We’re hopeful that the Senate works together to pass something quickly,” Calvert said.

Some Democrats view the legislation as a chance to impose basic guardrails on a rapidly growing industry that’s particularly popular among men and younger voters, two groups that drifted from the party in 2024.

___

Associated Press writers Alan Suderman, Lisa Mascaro, Matt Brown and Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

Joey Cappelletti, The Associated Press


Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry


By The Associated Press
 June 09, 2025 

The desktop and mobile websites for Stable Diffusion are pictured, Oct. 24, 2023, in New York. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)

LONDON — Getty Images is facing off against artificial intelligence company Stability AI in a London courtroom for the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry.

Opening arguments before a judge at the British High Court began on Monday. The trial could last for three weeks.

Stability, based in London, owns a widely used AI image-making tool that sparked enthusiasm for the instant creation of AI artwork and photorealistic images upon its release in August 2022. OpenAI introduced its surprise hit chatbot ChatGPT three months later.

Seattle-based Getty has argued that the development of the AI image maker, called Stable Diffusion, involved “brazen infringement” of Getty’s photography collection “on a staggering scale.”

Tech companies have long argued that “fair use” or “fair dealing” legal doctrines in the United States and United Kingdom allow them to train their AI systems on large troves of writings or images. Getty was among the first to challenge those practices when it filed copyright infringement lawsuits in the United States and the United Kingdom in early 2023.

“What Stability did was inappropriate,” Getty CEO Craig Peters told The Associated Press in 2023. He said creators of intellectual property should be asked for permission before their works are fed into AI systems rather than having to participate in an “opt-out regime.”

Getty’s legal team told the court Monday that its position is that the case isn’t a battle between the creative and technology industries and that the two can still work together in “synergistic harmony” because licensing creative works is critical to AI’s success.

“The problem is when AI companies such as Stability AI want to use those works without payment,” Getty’s trial lawyer, Lindsay Lane, said.

She said the case was about “straightforward enforcement of intellectual property rights,” including copyright, trademark and database rights.

Getty Images “recognizes that the AI industry is a force for good but that doesn’t justify those developing AI models to ride roughshod over intellectual property rights,” Lane said.

Stability AI had a “voracious appetite” for images to train its AI model, but the company was “completely indifferent to the nature of those works,” Lane said.

Stability didn’t care if images were protected by copyright, had watermarks, were not safe for work or were pornographic and just wanted to get its model to the market as soon as possible, Lane said.

“This trial is the day of reckoning for that approach,” she said.

Stability lawyers are expected to make their opening arguments Tuesday. They say in a prepared written argument that Getty’s claims “represent an overt threat to Stability’s whole business, and the wider generative AI industry.”

Stability has argued that the case doesn’t belong in the United Kingdom because the training of the AI model technically happened elsewhere, on computers run by U.S. tech giant Amazon. The company also argues that “only a tiny proportion” of the random outputs of its AI image-generator “look at all similar” to Getty’s works.

Once the trial concludes later this month, the judge’s decision is unlikely to give the AI industry what it most wants, which is expanded copyright exemptions for AI training, said Ben Milloy, a senior associate at U.K. law firm Fladgate, which is not involved in the case.


But it could “strengthen the hand of either party – rights holders or AI developers – in the context of the commercial negotiations for content licensing deals that are currently playing out worldwide,” Milloy said.

Similar cases in the U.S. have not yet gone to trial.

In the years after introducing its open-source technology, Stability confronted challenges in capitalizing on the popularity of the tool, battling lawsuits, misuse and other business problems.

Stable Diffusion’s roots trace back to Germany, where computer scientists at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich worked with the New York-based tech company Runway to develop the original algorithms. The university researchers credited Stability AI for providing the servers that trained the models, which require large amounts of computing power.

Stability later blamed Runway for releasing an early version of Stable Diffusion that was used to produce abusive sexual images, but also said it would have exclusive control of more recent versions of the AI model.

Stability last year announced what it described as a “significant” infusion of money from new investors including Facebook’s former president Sean Parker, who is now chair of Stability’s board. Parker has experience in intellectual property disputes as the co-founder of online music company Napster, which temporarily shuttered in the early 2000s after the record industry and popular rock band Metallica sued over copyright violations.

The new investments came after Stability’s founding CEO Emad Mostaque quit and several top researchers left to form a new German startup, Black Forest Labs, which makes a competing AI image generator.

——

By: Kelvin Chan And Matt O’Brien

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.
Alberta Premier Smith ‘going to convince’ B.C.’s Eby to build pipeline through their provinces
 June 08, 2025 





Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she’s ready to convince her counterpart in British Columbia to support building a pipeline to transport oil from her province, through his, to tidewater.


B.C. Premier David Eby said last week he won’t support a new pipeline, arguing the Trans Mountain Expansion Project is already in place.

Smith’s comments come after Prime Minister Mark Carney kicked off the week with a much-anticipated first ministers’ meeting on Monday, focusing largely on identifying so-called nation-building projects. Among them: a potential oil pipeline to tidewater.

Then, on Friday, Carney introduced legislation aimed at spurring interprovincial free trade, easing labour mobility, and speeding up the approval of a select but unspecified number of big projects in the national interest.

Speaking to reporters on Parliament Hill after the bill was tabled, however, Carney said his government would not impose any project on a province that isn’t in favour of it, and that all projects will require consensus to go ahead.


Smith, in an interview with CTV’s Question Period, was asked by host Vassy Kapelos where that emphasis on consensus leaves her pitch for a new pipeline, considering Eby has expressed opposition.

“I think everybody is focusing on one particular project,” Smith said, pointing to other potential projects in different provinces. “I’m rooting for all of my provincial neighbours. I want to do everything I can to support them, and I think that’s the spirit that will prevail.”

“There’s some things that we need to do to address some of the objections, but I think the Team Canada spirit is going to prevail at the end,” she added.

When asked by Kapelos whether it can be inferred from her comments that “a pipeline that carries oil from Alberta through to B.C. is not the be-all, end all,” Smith said: “No.”

“I’m saying that I’m going to convince David Eby of it, because I know that this is good for the country,” Smith said. “I know that he’s on Team Canada, and I can’t imagine, in the end, that if we meet the issues that have been raised by British Columbia, that he would go off team Canada. That doesn’t seem to me to be the type of person that David Eby is.”

The Alberta premier said while there are concerns that would likely need to be addressed — such as the pipeline’s route and buy-in from Indigenous communities — she’s confident those issues can be overcome.

“I recognize that there’s a quid pro quo here, that there has to be a way for everyone to benefit and to address legitimate concerns being raised,” Smith said. “That’s what we’re prepared to do.”

Transport and Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, in an interview on CTV’s Question Period, was asked by Kapelos who will ultimately make a decision about such a pipeline.

In response, Freeland said the legislation is about identifying potential nation-building projects, adding she’s “excited about the possibilities,” and pointing to other pitches.

When pressed on the pipeline specifically, considering the opposition to it, Freeland said the communiqué coming out of Monday’s first ministers’ meeting specifically mentioned pipelines.

“It talked about lots of projects. It included pipelines,” she said. “It talked about pipelines to export natural gas and decarbonized oil, so that is very much an option on the table.”

“The prime minister was also really clear that projects are going to need the consent of the provinces involved,” she also said, adding the bill tabled in the House is not a specific list of projects.



Spencer Van Dyk

Writer & Producer, Ottawa News Bureau, CTV News

CANADA

Average asking rents fall annually for eighth straight month to $2,129: report

By The Canadian Press
 June 09, 2025 

A for-rent and a for-sale sign are displayed on a house in a new housing development in Ottawa
 THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

The national average asking rent in May was down 3.3 per cent from a year earlier at $2,129, marking the eighth consecutive month of year-over-year decreases.

The latest monthly report from Rentals.ca and Urbanation says asking rents held steady from April, with a 0.1 per cent month-over-month increase.

Purpose-built apartment asking rents declined two per cent from a year ago to an average of $2,117, while asking rents for condominium apartments fell 3.6 per cent to $2,192.

Urbanation president Shaun Hildebrand says rents have eased in part due to a surge in supply from new apartment completions, a slowdown in population growth and a heightened level of economic uncertainty.

The report says average asking rents in Canada are 5.7 per cent higher than they were two years ago and 12.6 per cent above levels from three years ago.


Ontario recorded the largest rent decline in May, with asking rents falling 3.6 per cent year-over-year to an average of $2,335, followed by B.C.’s 2.6 per cent decrease to $2,462, Alberta’s 2.4 per cent decrease to $1,745 and Quebec’s 1.8 per cent decrease to $1,964.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.

By: Sammy Hudes