Friday, June 13, 2025

 

Single-material electronic skin gives robots the human touch





University of Cambridge
Improved electronic skin gives robots the human touch 

image: 

Scientists have developed a low-cost, durable, highly-sensitive robotic ‘skin’ that can be added to robotic hands like a glove, enabling robots to detect information about their surroundings in a way that’s similar to humans.

view more 

Credit: University of Cambridge





Scientists have developed a low-cost, durable, highly-sensitive robotic ‘skin’ that can be added to robotic hands like a glove, enabling robots to detect information about their surroundings in a way that’s similar to humans.

The researchers, from the University of Cambridge and University College London (UCL), developed the flexible, conductive skin, which is easy to fabricate and can be melted down and formed into a wide range of complex shapes. The technology senses and processes a range of physical inputs, allowing robots to interact with the physical world in a more meaningful way.

Unlike other solutions for robotic touch, which typically work via sensors embedded in small areas and require different sensors to detect different types of touch, the entirety of the electronic skin developed by the Cambridge and UCL researchers is a sensor, bringing it closer to our own sensor system: our skin.  

Although the robotic skin is not as sensitive as human skin, it can detect signals from over 860,000 tiny pathways in the material, enabling it to recognise different types of touch and pressure – like the tap of a finger, a hot or cold surface, damage caused by cutting or stabbing, or multiple points being touched at once – in a single material.

The researchers used a combination of physical tests and machine learning techniques to help the robotic skin ‘learn’ which of these pathways matter most, so it can sense different types of contact more efficiently.

In addition to potential future applications for humanoid robots or human prosthetics where a sense of touch is vital, the researchers say the robotic skin could be useful in industries as varied as the automotive sector or disaster relief. The results are reported in the journal Science Robotics.

Electronic skins work by converting physical information – like pressure or temperature – into electronic signals. In most cases, different types of sensors are needed for different types of touch – one type of sensor to detect pressure, another for temperature, and so on – which are then embedded into soft, flexible materials. However, the signals from these different sensors can interfere with each other, and the materials are easily damaged.

“Having different sensors for different types of touch leads to materials that are complex to make,” said lead author Dr David Hardman from Cambridge’s Department of Engineering. “We wanted to develop a solution that can detect multiple types of touch at once, but in a single material.”

“At the same time, we need something that’s cheap and durable, so that it’s suitable for widespread use,” said co-author Dr Thomas George Thuruthel from UCL.

Their solution uses one type of sensor that reacts differently to different types of touch, known as multi-modal sensing. While it’s challenging to separate out the cause of each signal, multi-modal sensing materials are easier to make and more robust.

The researchers melted down a soft, stretchy and electrically conductive gelatine-based hydrogel, and cast it into the shape of a human hand. They tested a range of different electrode configurations to determine which gave them the most useful information about different types of touch. From just 32 electrodes placed at the wrist, they were able to collect over 1.7 million pieces of information over the whole hand, thanks to the tiny pathways in the conductive material.

The skin was then tested on different types of touch: the researchers blasted it with a heat gun, pressed it with their fingers and a robotic arm, gently touched it with their fingers, and even cut it open with a scalpel. The team then used the data gathered during these tests to train a machine learning model so the hand would recognise what the different types of touch meant. 

“We’re able to squeeze a lot of information from these materials – they can take thousands of measurements very quickly,” said Hardman, who is a postdoctoral researcher in the lab of co-author Professor Fumiya Iida. “They’re measuring lots of different things at once, over a large surface area.”

“We’re not quite at the level where the robotic skin is as good as human skin, but we think it’s better than anything else out there at the moment,” said Thuruthel. “Our method is flexible and easier to build than traditional sensors, and we’re able to calibrate it using human touch for a range of tasks.”

In future, the researchers are hoping to improve the durability of the electronic skin, and to carry out further tests on real-world robotic tasks.

The research was supported by Samsung Global Research Outreach Program, the Royal Society, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). Fumiya Iida is a Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.


Scientists have developed a low-cost, durable, highly-sensitive robotic ‘skin’ that can be added to robotic hands like a glove, enabling robots to detect information about their surroundings in a way that’s similar to humans.




Scientists have developed a low-cost, durable, highly-sensitive robotic ‘skin’ that can be added to robotic hands like a glove, enabling robots to detect information about their surroundings in a way that’s similar to humans.



Credit

University of Cambridge

 

What’s in a name? New research catalogues how birds are categorized by what we call them



Findings, drawn from database created by NYU, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, reflect how we interact with nature



New York University

An immature female Northern parula 

image: 

An immature female Northern parula

view more 

Credit: Carol Ourivio/NYU





There are thousands of species of birds, and many of their names are well-known to us—blue jay, robin, and mallard, to name just a few. But we have little understanding of the holistic nature of avian nomenclature. Do birds’ names tend to stem from physical or biological traits, such as a black-and-white warbler, or, rather, from people—such as Bonaparte’s gull, which was named after Charles Lucien Bonaparte, an ornithologist and nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte?

A new study by New York University and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County answers many of these questions. 

After compiling a database of nearly 11,000 birds’ names, the researchers found that a majority—nearly 90 percent—are named after biological or other characteristics and a very small percentage—11 percent—are named after people. 

The database, the AvianLexiconAtlas, comes nearly two years after the American Ornithological Society announced that it would rename all bird species currently honoring people. 

“Until the publication of this database, there was no quantitative way to analyze the current state of terms in English bird names,” explains Erin Morrison, a professor in Liberal Studies at NYU and the co-lead author of the paper, which appears in the journal PLOS One. “In addition to showing that a very small percentage of birds are named after people, the database reveals some of the terminology we use to name birds is very specialized—and it points towards an issue with how accessible these names are, such as the isabelline shrike and the diademed sandpiper-plover, even to native English speakers.”

“The work gives us a rich insight into how birds are named overall,” adds Allison Shultz, co-lead author and curator of ornithology at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. “Those naming processes can reflect all the strangeness and specificity of the people naming them, their culture, and their history—things that wouldn’t help tell you what a bird looks like.”

Some of the stranger bird names include the barnacle goose, whose name comes from an erroneous medieval notion that these geese hatched from barnacles each autumn, and the Pincoya storm-petrel—a moniker based on mythical Chilean sea nymph who represents the fertility of the seas, aids shipwrecked mariners, and dances on the waves to indicate good or bad fishing. 

Common names are often the way the general public interacts and communicates about species in nature—for instance, brown bears or the California sea lion. These names should therefore provide an accessible way for people to engage with and identify species—though this isn’t always the case when it comes to birds.

“In ornithology, there has been significant reflection among both professional researchers and amateur naturalists about what the terminology in regionally standardized English-language common names should communicate about species of birds,” explains Morrison. 

Some names directly describe characteristics of a species (e.g., yellow-rumped warbler), while other names are ambiguous (e.g., barnacle goose), are unrelated to the species’ biology (e.g., Wilson’s warbler), or have no obvious significance (e.g., the common grackle).

The researchers believe that the AvianLexiconAtlas, a Github site that encompasses nearly all known bird species, can serve as a systematic resource to assess the types of terminology used in the English-language common names of birds. 

“Our hope is that this database, which includes the categorical dataset as well as a glossary and gazetteer of terms in English-language bird names, can be used by other researchers and amateur naturalists to study the utility of the terms, linguistic patterns, and their biological relevance—among other educational uses,” says Morrison.

The AvianLexiconAtlas database provides a quantitative dataset that assigns the unique descriptor of each species's common name to one of 10 distinct categories associated with aspects of avian physical traits, avian natural history, or human culture. These include the black-capped chickadee (a physical trait shared by both sexes), the European starling (geographic location), and the rock pigeon, which nests on cliffs (natural history).

The project started with Morrison and Shultz wondering how many species were named after birds’ feathers, or plumage, found only in males—such as a scarlet tanager.

“We found that about 1,000 of the 11,000 species were named after male-only plumage, but just 20 were named after female-only plumage—with the orange-bellied antwren being one of the few,” notes Shultz. 

The compiling of the atlas began in Morrison’s Life Science class at NYU in the fall of 2022. In a course assignment, the students identified whether a bird species is named after a person, a non-English language term (e.g., baglafecht weaver), a geographic location, a physical trait, physical size (e.g., small blue kingfisher), a natural history trait (e.g., mangrove finch), or a behavioral trait (e.g., mute swan). Some of the course’s students, along with NYU Liberal Studies professors Kevin Bonney, Ida Chavoshan, Jared Simard, and Talia Mota, are among the paper’s co-authors. 

“In the future, we look forward to combining what we learned with rich sources of data like our bird collections to understand the connections between birds and people better,” says Shultz. “Overall, this work provides valuable insights in helping develop approachable names that help strengthen this connection and ultimately help protect birds and nature.” 

# # #

A red-eyed vireo

Credit

Carol Ourivio/NYU

Scientists uncover insights into the origins of antibodies to peanut




Massachusetts General Hospital





Why do people develop antibodies to food? While clinicians have long observed that healthy humans develop a particular type of antibody, called IgG, to the foods they eat, the reasons for this phenomenon have remained unknown. Researchers, led by investigators from Allergy and Immunology at Mass General Brigham, have identified the mechanism underlying IgG antibody development to food proteins. They discovered that humans are intrinsically predisposed to develop a particular type of IgG antibody to peanut by human antibody genes. These antibodies develop, whether or not they develop peanut allergy. Results are published in Science Translational Medicine.

“Our research not only explains why we have always found these antibodies against peanut, but why so many people, including young children, have such similar antibodies to a food so common in the world,” said senior author Sarita Patil, MD, co-director of the Food Allergy Center at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), a founding member of Mass General Brigham. Patil is also an assistant professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. “We were astonished to find highly similar antibodies. Statistically this seems improbable, since our immune system can produce as many as a quintillion different kinds of antibodies. When we found these nearly identical, public antibodies in multiple patients, we were fascinated.”

The research team, including lead author Orlee Marini-Rapoport, who conducted the work at MGH, found that humans are poised to develop antibodies to peanut in highly predictable ways through multiple pathways. In fact, these antibodies can bind to peanut before they undergo further evolution. Despite the different alleles, or variations in the human genome that exist in antibody genes, most humans have gene alleles that can contribute to making these antibodies. The research team then looked for these specific antibodies by designing a new assay using blood. In peanut-allergic patients, all of them had these antibodies. The team then set out to discover whether these common, easy-to-produce antibodies might also develop at the earliest time after infants begin to eat peanut. Indeed, most young children from ages 1-3 who make IgG antibodies to these peanut proteins make these specific antibodies.

While this work begins to explain why nonallergic individuals develop antibodies to food proteins, it also has important implications to the field of allergy. The fact that individuals develop highly similar antibodies suggests that it is also possible to therapeutically target food allergy across patients.  

“As we know, antibodies can be protective, but they can also cause disease in the context of allergy,” said Patil. “If on a larger level, we can dissect how humans develop antibodies, and why some go on to become allergic, we may be able to intervene with targeted therapies to treat and prevent food allergies on a population level.”

 

Authorship: In addition to Patil and Marini-Rapoport, Mass General Brigham authors include Lena Andrieux, Tarun Keswani, Timothy Sun, Victoria M. Martin, Qian Yuan, and Wayne G. Shreffler. Additional authors include Guangning Zong, Dylan Duchen, Gur Yaari, Jungki Min, Isabelle R. Lytle, Alexander F. Rosenberg, Christopher Fucile, James J. Kobie, Michael S. Piepenbrink, Antti E. Seppo, Kirsi M. Jarvinen, Johannes R. Loeffler, Andrew B. Ward, Steven H. Kleinstein, Lars C. Pedersen, Monica L. Fernandez-Quintero, and Geoffrey A. Mueller.

Disclosures: Patil has consultancy agreements with Mabylon, Bulhmann, and Seismic Therapeutics and is a site PI for a clinical trial for Regeneron. Min, Pedersen, Mueller, and Patil filed U.S. Provisional Patent 63/486,570 containing the epitope 1.1 mutant rAra h 2 allergen. Jarvinen has consultancy agreements with Janssen R&D, Harmony/Milk Care co and is a site PI for a clinical trial for Aimmune and Siolta. Duchen has a consultancy agreement with Artizan Biosciences. Kleinstein has a consultancy agreement with Peraton. Martin is a paid consultant who serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for Milk Care Co.


Funding: Funding for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI155630, R01AI182001, U01 131344, R01AI104739), Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (1ZIAES102906, 1ZICES102645), Food Allergy Science Initiative, Gerber Foundation, Demarest Lloyd Jr. Foundation Thornhill Family Fund, NIAID (K23AI151556), and a Yale-Boehringer Ingelheim Biomedical Data Science Fellowship.

 

Paper cited: Marini-Rapoport, O et al. “Germline-encoded recognition of peanut underlies development of convergent antibodies in humans” Science Translational Medicine DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adw4148
 

For More Information:

MGH Food Allergy Center

For Some Trick or Treaters, Food Allergies are a True Fear Factor. Here’s How Research at Mass General Brigham Could Help

Researchers Identify Mechanism Underlying Allergic Itching, and Show It Can Be Blocked

 

###

About Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations with several Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals. For more information, please visit massgeneralbrigham.org.

 

A combination of exercise and omega-3 reduces the severity of tooth root infections



Rats that exercised and took fatty acid supplements responded better to bacteria and the inflammatory process of apical periodontitis, which can occur when caries reach the root canal and cause an infection





Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo





A study published in the journal Scientific Reports indicates that physical exercise combined with omega-3 supplementation considerably improves the immune response and reduces the severity of chronic apical periodontitis.

Inflammation at the apex of the tooth – the tip of the root – and in the surrounding area is primarily caused by caries. If left untreated, the bacteria can reach the root canal and pass through it to the apex, causing apical periodontitis. This condition leads to bone loss in the area. 

The study is the first to demonstrate that a combination of moderate physical exercise and omega-3 supplementation significantly improves the inflammatory condition caused by apical periodontitis. This combination limited bacterial progression, reduced bone tissue loss, regulated the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and stimulated the activity of fibroblasts, the cells that create and maintain tissue.

If left untreated, the infection can lead to tooth loss. In addition, there is a two-way relationship between apical periodontitis and systemic changes in patients. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, arteriosclerosis, and kidney disease, among others, can exacerbate apical periodontitis. At the same time, infection in the apex can exacerbate these diseases. 

“It’s a condition that patients may not even know they have because of its chronic nature, but which can evolve and lead to bone destruction and tooth mobility. In addition, in specific situations, such as a drop in immunity, it can become acute, so the patient starts to feel pain, pus forms at the site, the face can become swollen,” explains Rogério de Castilho, a professor at the Araçatuba School of Dentistry at São Paulo State University (FOA-UNESP) in Brazil. Castilho supervised the study and is supported by FAPESP.

“In rats, physical exercise alone brought about a systemic improvement, regulating the local immune response. In addition, when combined with supplementation, it further reduced the destructive condition caused by endodontic pathology,” explains Ana Paula Fernandes Ribeiro, the first author of the study, carried out during her doctorate at FOA-UNESP.

Less inflammation

The researchers induced apical periodontitis in 30 rats and divided them into three groups. The first group received no intervention. The second and third groups underwent a 30-day swimming regimen. 

The third group also received dietary supplementation of omega-3, a polyunsaturated fatty acid known for its therapeutic effects on chronic inflammatory diseases. 

The group that only swam had better outcomes than the untreated control group. However, omega-3 supplementation combined with physical exercise regulated the immune response and infection control even better.

Immunohistochemical analyses, which assess how the immune system responds to infection, revealed varying levels of the cytokines interleukin 17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), indicating the intensity of the inflammatory response. 

While the rats that received no treatment had moderate levels of these cytokines, those that exercised had lower levels, and those that took supplementation had the lowest levels.

In addition to having lower levels of these cytokines, the group that exercised had fewer osteoclasts. These are cells that resorb bone tissue, indicating bone loss. The results were even better for the group that consumed omega-3, showing statistically significant differences compared to the animals that received no treatment.

Micro CT scans of the jaws showed that the animals that swam experienced less loss of volume of alveolar bone, which covers the teeth, than those in the control group. The loss was even less in the supplemented group.

For the authors, the study provides new evidence of the benefits of physical activity and omega-3 for the immune system, now with even more obvious repercussions for oral health. 

“To know if the same would be true for humans, we’d need a clinical study with a significant number of patients. However, in addition to the many proven benefits of physical exercise and omega-3 consumption, this is yet another important piece of evidence,” Jacinto says.

The work was supported by FAPESP through Scientific Initiation grants awarded to Michely de Lima Rodrigues (20/13089-3 and 22/04884-0), another co-author of the study. 

About FAPESP

The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration.

 

 

A California dairy tried to capture its methane. It worked



Sealing manure ponds at a Central Valley farm cut emissions dramatically 



University of California - Riverside

Dairy digester 

image: 

​Dairy digester on a Central Valley farm helping to reduce methane emissions. 

view more 

Credit: Chelsea Preble/UC Berkeley





A giant, balloon-like tarp stretches over a lagoon of manure on a Central Valley dairy farm, concealing a quiet but remarkable transformation. Methane, a potent climate-warming gas, is being captured and cleaned instead of released into the atmosphere.

A new study from researchers at the University of California, Riverside shows the effectiveness of dairy digesters, which are manure ponds tightly sealed to capture and re-use the methane they produce. The study shows these systems can reduce atmospheric methane emissions by roughly 80 percent, a result that closely matches estimates California state officials have used in their climate planning.

The findings, published in Global Change Biology Bioenergy, come as California ramps up investment in methane control technologies to meet its goal of cutting emissions 40 percent below 2013 levels by the end of the decade. More than 130 of these systems are now operating across California dairies, but until now, their real-world performance hadn’t been verified this rigorously.

“The digesters can leak, and they sometimes do,” said Francesca Hopkins, a climate scientist at UCR who led the research. “But when the system is built well and managed carefully, the emissions really drop. That’s what we saw here.”

The team focused on a family-run dairy farm in Tulare County, a hot and dry region in the San Joaquin Valley that produces more milk than any other county in the United States. The researchers conducted mobile atmospheric measurements around the farm for a year before and a year after the digester system was installed in 2021, collecting hundreds of data points from a van equipped with precision gas sensors.

Methane is more than 80 times as potent as carbon dioxide at warming the atmosphere over a 20-year time frame. In California, much of the methane comes from dairy cows. The gas is not just from the burps they emit after eating, but from the way their manure is stored. When manure is held in open, water-filled pits, it breaks down without oxygen and emits methane into the air.

Covering those pits with gas-tight membranes allows the gas to be trapped, cleaned, and piped into fuel systems that often replace diesel in long-haul trucks. At the Tulare County site, researchers initially found some leaks in the system. Working with the digester operator, California Bioenergy, the team flagged the problems. Adjustments were made. The methane reductions followed.

“This was a textbook case of adaptive management,” Hopkins said. “The partnership between scientists, the company, and the farmer really made a huge difference.”

While the study affirms the potential of dairy digesters, it also acknowledges their limitations. They do not address other emissions common to dairy operations, such as ammonia or airborne particles that affect local air quality. Building the digesters is also no small task. It requires permits, capital investment, and long-term maintenance.

“They’re not for every farm,” Hopkins said. “But for dairies that can make it work, this is one of the most cost-effective ways we have to cut these greenhouse gas emissions.”

California is also expanding its monitoring capacity with satellite technology that can detect large methane leaks from space. State regulators can follow up with site operators when emissions spikes are detected.

Hopkins views the effort as a model for how climate policy, science, and industry can align when conditions are right. “There’s so much division in the climate space,” she said. “But this is a real example of cooperation that leads to measurable results.”