Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Cold winters halt the northward spread of species in a warming climate



Stockholm University
Mats Ittonen 

image: 

Mats Ittonen, evolutionary ecologist and entomologist, former PhD student at Stockholm University, currently postdoctoral researcher in the Macroecology workgroup at the University of Tartu, Estonia Photo: Mats Ittonen 

view more 

Credit: Mats Ittonen





As the climate warms, many species are shifting northward into areas that were previously too cold for them. A new study on the wall brown butterfly, published in the scientific journal PNAS, shows that rapid evolution can aid this process – but only up to a point. Cold winters stop further expansion beyond certain climatic limits.

“Our results show that even though the butterflies adapt their life cycle as they move northwards, there are limits that evolution cannot easily overcome,” says Mats Ittonen, one of the lead authors of the study done by researchers at the Department of Zoology, Stockholm University.

The wall brown (Lasiommata megera), a common European grassland butterfly, has become more common at higher latitudes in Scandinavia, despite declining steeply in Western Europe. During its northward expansion, rapid evolution has helped the butterfly adapt its life cycle to new conditions – evolution helps the species cope with factors that do not change with climate warming, such as daylength. But despite these changes, cold winters still prevent the wall brown from spreading further north.

Two years of field experiments

The researchers did field experiments in which they moved butterflies within and north of the species’ current range in Sweden. Individuals collected in the south (Skåne county) and north (Södermanland, and Uppland counties) were placed in field cages at sites in Skåne, Södermanland, and southern Dalarna – the latter being an area where the species has not yet spread. By comparing how caterpillars of different origins grow and develop under shared environmental conditions, the researchers could investigate how the wall brown has evolved during its northward expansion over the past 20–30 years. The caterpillars were also left in the field over winter to see whether better winter survival has evolved in northern populations – and whether they could persist further north than the species is currently found.

“We wanted to know whether traits like faster growth, properly timed winter dormancy, and improved winter survival have evolved in northern butterflies – traits that could help them establish even further north,” says Karl Gotthard, professor at the Department of Zoology, Stockholm University.

Few caterpillars survived in the north

The study found that butterflies from northern populations grew faster than those from the south, likely as an adaptation to the shorter summers of higher latitudes. They also managed to enter dormancy at the correct time of year. But despite these evolutionary changes, very few caterpillars survived the winter in Dalarna, north of the species’ current range.

“These kinds of limits are important to recognize if we want to predict how far north other species – including pests and disease vectors – will be able to move in a future climate,” says Karl Gotthard.

Winter cold remains a barrier

The findings show that evolution can proceed quickly enough to influence the distribution of insects under climate change, yet that does not necessarily mean that the specific traits that are most critical for survival evolve. For the wall brown butterfly, further northward expansion will still require milder winters, not just longer and warmer summers. This may be true for many species.

“The wall brown is far from alone—many other insect species have also expanded northward over the past few decades, both in Sweden and elsewhere. Understanding both which traits evolve and which ones actually set the limits for where species can live is essential for predicting the future of ecosystems and biodiversity in a warming world,” says Mats Ittonen.

Find the study ”Winters restrict a climate change-driven butterfly range expansion despite rapid evolution of seasonal timing traits” in PNAS.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2418392122

 

Study finds early signs of widespread coastal marsh decline




Colorado State University
Marsh deterioration with sea-level rise graphic 

image: 

Declines in belowground biomass can indicate marsh vulnerability to loss. This diagram illustrates how a healthy salt marsh (left) can convert first to a vulnerable marsh (middle) before loss of the vegetated marsh (right) as a result of increased inundation intensity, which is driven by sea-level rise. Diagram by Kyle Runion

view more 

Credit: Kyle Runion/Colorado State University





Researchers have revealed the declining health of coastal marshes several years before visible signs of decline, providing an early warning and opportunity to protect an ecosystem that serves as the first line of defense against coastal flooding.   

Scientists from Colorado State University, the University of Georgia and the University of Texas at Austin developed a model to detect early signs of marsh decline using satellite observations. The model identified vulnerable marshes along Georgia’s coast by locating declining root production – a harbinger of marsh failure.  

The research, published in June in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the first to predict broad trends in marsh deterioration using remote sensing.   

“Our findings show widespread belowground decline over the past decade and suggest this is an early warning sign of marsh deterioration and loss,” said lead author Kyle Runion, a research scientist at the University of Georgia who was at UT Austin’s Marine Science Institute during the study. “By pinpointing where belowground loss is happening, we can get a head start on conservation and restoration projects to more effectively prevent marsh loss.”  

Coastal marshes filter water, store carbon, act as habitat for wildlife and provide food and fishing livelihoods for people. Marshes also absorb storm surges and sea-level rise, preventing worse flooding inland.    

"These marsh areas might be in someone's backyard,” said senior author Jessica O’Connell, a CSU professor and Runion’s adviser. “It’s important to have this early warning and a chance to do something before you lose these special landscapes that people have an economic or emotional connection to.”   

O’Connell added, “Conserving the natural landscape is a lot cheaper than losing it and then trying to come up with an environmentally engineered way to do the things that the land used to do.”   

The study focused on the marsh grass Spartina alterniflora, which is found along much of the U.S. coast. The researchers examined the entire Georgia coast – an area for which they had extensive field data – and found belowground biomass has declined across 72% of Georgia’s coastal marsh since 2014, with nearly 30% suffering substantial loss.  

They are now working to make the model universally applicable to all marsh plants and coastlines.  

Declines in belowground biomass indicate marsh vulnerability to loss  

The research team developed the Belowground Ecosystem Resiliency Model (BERM) using more than a decade of field data gathered through the Georgia Coastal Ecosystems Long Term Ecological Research Program at the University of Georgia. The program, led by co-author Merryl Alber and funded by the National Science Foundation, collected data on marsh grass leaves and stems aboveground, along with roots and rhizomes belowground.  

This rigorous fieldwork detailed the complicated – and sometimes contradictory – relationship between above- and belowground marsh grass growth. The study found that marsh grass might appear to be healthy or even thriving aboveground, while the roots could be receding.    

Coastal marshes are adapted to salt water and fluctuating water levels. Periodic flooding or slow sea-level rise can boost plant growth by flushing out excess salt buildup and bathing plants in nutrient-rich sediment, which contributes to the soil in which they grow.   

“Coastal wetlands such as salt marshes historically have responded dynamically to keep pace with sea-level rise in part by developing extensive root networks, which expand the soils with organic-rich material,” Runion said. “This accumulation of ‘blue carbon’ drives elevation gain and enables the marsh surface to maintain elevation relative to rising sea levels.”  

However, if the water stays too high, marsh vegetation can drown as roots are deprived of oxygen. Root system decline is the first sign that a marsh is failing.  

“The declines in vegetation were closely related to flooding pressure, which will only worsen with the rapid acceleration of sea-level rise that the southeast U.S. is experiencing,” said Alber, a UGA professor and director of UGA’s Marine Institute. “That is why this work is so important.”     

BERM predicts both above- and belowground biomass based on plant characteristics that are observable from space and environmental factors, such as elevation, sea level and climate. The researchers applied it to all Georgia locations of Spartina alterniflora, mapped by co-author Christine Hladik, a geography professor at Georgia Southern University.  

The study was also co-authored by Deepak Mishra at the University of Georgia and Mark Lever at the University of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute. Research was funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Science Foundation.  

 

Some studies might not paint full picture of how plants respond to climate change




Michigan State University
Open top chambers 

image: 

Open top chambers are kept beneath rainout shelters at the Kellogg Biological Station Long-Term Ecological Research Site.

view more 

Credit: Kara Dobson






EAST LANSING, Mich. – Scientists may be underestimating how plants will respond to rising global temperatures when they study hot summers but not warming winters, Michigan State University ecologists found. 

An MSU team synthesized data from 126 simulated warming experiments from across the globe to provide insights into how plants respond to a hotter climate. In their findings, now published in Global Change Biology, they learned that experiments with warming only during summer months showed less-pronounced results than year-round experiments. This could mean that summer-only experiments don’t account for the important effects of winter warming and may provide conflicting results.  

The study also unveiled a lack of research on the effects of warming on non-native species, potentially hindering scientists’ ability to understand how these species respond to climate change. The authors identified knowledge gaps in current studies, suggesting that future warming experiments should last longer to allow for multiple seasons and years of warming. 

“This important global synthesis of warming effects on plants across many ecosystems can be used to inform models of future impacts,” said Phoebe Zarnetske, an author and professor in MSU’s Integrative Biology department and Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, or EEB, Program. “We hope to inspire more experiments to fill knowledge gaps of climate change impacts on plants and their communities.”  

Zarnetske is also principal investigator of the Spatial and Community Ecology Lab (SpaCE Lab), whose long-term and year-round warming experiment at Kellogg Biological Station’s Long-Term Ecological Research, or LTER, Site was one of the 126 sites in the meta-analysis. Its first seven years were summarized in a recent publication.

Understanding global changes 

Around the world, researchers are working together through coordinated efforts, such as the LTER network, to better understand how plants respond to global changes across different environments.  

In their latest paper, the MSU team analyzed studies that used open-top chambers to investigate how temperature increases caused changes in plant traits and plant community properties. They also explored how the severity of changes varied based on location, experimental methods and plant identity.  

“Experiments that simulate warming are critical for helping scientists uncover the processes driving these changes,” author and integrative biology and former EEB Ph.D student Kara Dobson said.  

The scope of the analysis allowed researchers to identify global trends in plant responses and predict what may happen in the future as temperatures continue to climb. 

The results were striking. MSU’s team found that plants in temperate regions with hot summers and cold winters show more pronounced responses to warming than those grown in more tropical regions with less extreme variations in temperature.

Previous studies have suggested that non-native plants could benefit from future climate conditions, potentially increasing the likelihood that they spread or become invasive. Meanwhile, non-vascular plants have often shown negative responses to warming, raising concerns that they could decline globally as climate conditions continue to change. However, this study highlights the lack of research on the effects of passive warming on non-native and non-vascular species, especially compared to their native and vascular counterparts.

Including a broader variety of plant types in climate research, as well as coordinating these experiments across different environment and over long periods of time, will help us understand which species are likely to thrive – or struggle – in a warmer future. 

“This study is unique in terms of the size of the dataset we collected,” Dobson said. “It brings together data from experiments across the globe and from all continents, including Antarctica.” 

Funding for this research comes from the National Science Foundation Research Traineeship Program, the Kellogg Biological Station-LTER and the MSU College of Natural Science. 

By Caleb Hess 

### 

Michigan State University has been advancing the common good with uncommon will for more than 170 years. One of the world’s leading public research universities, MSU pushes the boundaries of discovery to make a better, safer, healthier world for all while providing life-changing opportunities to a diverse and inclusive academic community through more than 400 programs of study in 17 degree-granting colleges. 

For generations, Spartans have been changing the world through research. Federal funding helps power many of the discoveries that improve lives and keep America at the forefront of innovation and competitiveness. From lifesaving cancer treatments to solutions that advance technology, agriculture, energy and more, MSU researchers work every day to shape a better future for the people of Michigan and beyond. Learn more about MSU’s research impact powered by partnership with the federal government.  

For MSU news on the web, go to MSUToday or x.com/MSUnews. 

 

HSE scientists reveal how staying at alma mater can affect early-career researchers






National Research University Higher School of Economics

Academic Inbreeding 

image: 

Share of inbreds and mobile researchers by fields of study, sector, region, and gender.

view more 

Credit: Victoria Slepykh, Academic inbreeding and productivity of STEM early career researchers in different environments, Research Policy, Volume 54, Issue 6, 2025




Many early-career scientists continue their academic careers at the same university where they studied, a practice known as academic inbreeding. A researcher at the HSE Institute of Education analysed the impact of academic inbreeding on publication activity in the natural sciences and mathematics. The study found that the impact is ambiguous and depends on various factors, including the university's geographical location, its financial resources, and the state of the regional academic employment market. A paper with the study findings has been published in Research Policy

In Russia, nearly half of all PhD holders continue working at the same university where they earned their degree—a career path known as academic inbreeding. This practice is believed to contribute to academic isolation and diminish the potential for innovation. Nevertheless, the impact of academic inbreeding on the productivity of early-career scientists remains insufficiently studied.

Victoria Slepyh, Junior Research Fellow at the HSE Laboratory for University Development, examined the career trajectories of 1,132 Russian scientists who earned their PhDs in 2012 in the fields of physics, biology, chemistry, and mathematics. To assess research productivity, the author analysed publications in international journals, their citation counts, and the presence of articles in first-quartile (Q1) journals. 

The analysis was conducted on two levels. First, the author examined all 1,132 PhD holders who remained in academia during the first eight years following their dissertation defence. Among this group, the rate of academic inbreeding was 61%. The results showed that graduates who moved to different universities after earning their degrees were, on average, more likely to publish, have articles accepted in prestigious journals, and receive higher citation counts compared to those who remained at their alma mater.

The most pronounced negative effect of academic inbreeding was observed at universities without special status—those not designated as federal or national research universities and not participating in government science support programmes. Early-career researchers at such universities published, on average, 34% fewer articles indexed by Scopus, and their likelihood of having at least one publication in a prestigious journal was nearly half that of more mobile scientists.

According to the author, if an early-career researcher remains at a university with limited scientific activity and resources, they tend to reproduce low academic standards. Moreover, a limited professional experience reduces their competitiveness compared to their more mobile colleagues. 

Victoria Slepykh

'In prestigious, research-oriented institutions, academic inbreeding generally does not have a significant impact on productivity. This can be attributed to a rich professional environment, including a strong research team, modern equipment, stable collaborations with other organisations, and involvement in major projects,' explains Slepykh.

Next, the author identified a subgroup of the most productive scientists—417 individuals whose number of publications exceeded the median (ranging from four to six publications during the first eight years of their academic careers). The proportion of inbreds was 56% in this sample. At the same time, the impact of academic inbreeding on productivity within this subgroup was minimal and appeared only in certain cases—specifically, among graduates who earned their degrees in regions with a saturated academic employment market.

In regions with numerous scientific institutions, graduates have greater opportunities to move to a different employer. When remaining at one’s alma mater under such circumstances stems from inertia rather than a deliberate choice, early-career researchers may miss the opportunity to thrive in a more suitable professional environment. In less developed regions, academic inbreeding is typically driven by limited alternatives. The study findings support the hypothesis that when early-career scientists have more employment options, remaining at their alma mater can negatively affect their productivity.

Additionally, the study revealed differences in behaviour across scientific disciplines. For example, mathematicians were more likely to pursue mobile career paths and less likely to remain at the universities where they earned their degrees, whereas physicists and chemists exhibited a stronger tendency toward academic inbreeding. The author attributes these differences to the nature of research infrastructure and publication traditions in various scientific fields. 

'Academic inbreeding, in itself, is not necessarily problematic. However, its consequences can adversely affect scientific productivity, especially at universities without special status or with limited resources. To mitigate the risks of isolation, measures should be implemented to encourage academic mobility and the expansion of external collaborations. These may include internships, academic exchanges, and the development of partnerships with leading research centres. Such initiatives will enhance not only productivity but also the overall quality of the academic environment,' according to Slepykh.

 

HSE linguists study how bilinguals use phrases with numerals in Russian



National Research University Higher School of Economics





Researchers at HSE University analysed over 4,000 examples of Russian spoken by bilinguals for whom Russian is a second language, collected from seven regions of Russia. They found that most non-standard numeral constructions are influenced not only by the speakers’ native languages but also by how frequently these expressions occur in everyday speech. For example, common phrases like 'two hours' or 'five kilometres’ almost always match the standard literary form, while less familiar expressions—especially those involving the numbers numerals two to four or collective forms like dvoe and troe (used for referring to people)—often differ from the norm. The study has been published in International Journal of Bilingualism.

Russian numerals can be confusing not only for foreigners, but also for native speakers and bilinguals—those fluent in two or more languages. Some studies suggest that the grammar of a speaker’s first language—such as Nanai or Ulchi—can influence their acquisition of Russian. Other researchers, however, argue that the influence of the native language is just one of several factors.

Researchers at the HSE Linguistic Convergence Laboratory analysed how bilinguals from different regions of Russia use numerals in spoken Russian. The team processed seven collections of interviews recorded in Daghestan, Bashkortostan, Chuvashia, Mari El, Karelia, and other regions. The sample included spontaneous speech from over 180 native speakers of 21 different languages. Each collection featured recordings of natural conversations in which participants responded to the researchers' questions and shared stories about themselves, their families, and the village life. Out of more than 7,000 numeral-containing phrases, the researchers selected approximately 4,000 for analysis, excluding constructions with ordinal numerals and oblique cases.

The results showed that non-standard realizations of numeral constructions in Russian are influenced not only by the native language but also by other factors such as the education level, age, and—most importantly—how frequently the expression is used in speech. The more familiar a phrase—such as 'two hours' or 'five kilometres'—the less likely it is to appear in a non-standard form. This supports the hypothesis that linguistic constructions are acquired not through formal rules but through regular usage.

Chiara Naccarato

'It cannot be said that bilinguals simply project the grammar of their native language onto Russian when they use it. Even if a native speaker grew up in an environment where numerals function differently than in Russian, it doesn’t mean they will consistently copy the structures of their native language when speaking Russian,' explains Chiara Naccarato, Research Fellow at the Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, Associate Professor at the HSE Faculty of Humanities, and co-author of the paper.

Numerals from two to four, along with collective forms like dvoe and troe, proved particularly challenging for participants and were used in non-standard forms much more frequently.

The frequency of non-standard numeral constructions in the speech of bilinguals from different regions.

These findings are relevant not only to linguists but also to educators, as they highlight which areas of grammar require more attention. In the future, the authors plan to investigate other areas where the native language may—or may not—influence the Russian language acquisition.

The study was conducted with support from HSE University's Basic Research Programme within the framework of the Centres of Excellence project.