Wednesday, July 09, 2025

  

The Critical Impact Of Extreme Heat On Rice Production In Southeast Asia – Analysis

Farmer Harvest Agriculture Rice Harvesting Asia


By 

By Elyssa Ludher


Southeast Asia’s food production has faced mounting challenges in recent years from increasingly severe climate events such as heat waves, droughts, floods, and storms. However, the looming threat of extreme heat is poised to overshadow these other impacts, based on climate modelling in Singapore’s Third Climate Change Study (V3).

As the region grapples with agricultural adaptation strategies for flood resistance, drought tolerance, and salinity management, the urgent reality is that extreme heat could impose even more devastating consequences on food supply. Southeast Asia needs to prioritise adaptation measures to develop heat-tolerant agriculture, particularly rice.

Rice is a staple food crop for nearly 700 million Southeast Asians, constituting approximately 50 per cent of caloric intake.[1] Any rice shortage is a cause of concern for Southeast Asian governments due to its outsized impact on public health, welfare, and social stability.

The purpose of this article is to present the nature of extreme heat, highlight its impact on rice supply, and identify measures that countries could adopt to build resilience to rising heat.

WHAT IS EXTREME HEAT AND HOW IS IT IMPACTING THE REGION?

There is as yet no universally accepted definition of “extreme heat”. The United States Department of Homeland Security identifies it as a “period of high heat and humidity with temperatures above 90 degrees Fahrenheit (or 32.2oC) for at least two to three days.[2] In Singapore, heat stress is measured by the Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT).[3] Days in Singapore are considered as “high heat stress” based on high WBGT readings exceeding 33oC for at least one hour. This usually involves the presence of high humidity, low windspeed, and high solar radiation.[4] While both air temperature and WBGT are measured in degree Celsius (oC), they are not interchangeable. Also, heat stress differs from heat waves, which typically refer to periods of hot weather abnormally deviant from the norm for that period and lasting for a few consecutive days.


Southeast Asia is already experiencing more frequent episodes of extreme heat. For the past two years, the region has endured prolonged and record-breaking periods of heat, with air temperatures repeatedly exceeding 40oC. In an extreme example, the Heat Index (HI, another measure of heat stress used by some countries that differs from WBGT in its calculation and applications) exceeded 52oC in Bangkok in April 2024.[5] Between January and early May 2024, 61 people in Bangkok and elsewhere in Thailand perished from heat-related causes, and hundreds more sought hospital care for heat stress; this was nearly double the fatalities from heat in the whole of 2023.[6] Based on the Climate Shift Index, 27 April 2024, was reported to be among the hottest days in Southeast Asia. It brought between +0.5oC and +10oC higher temperatures than historical norms to much of Southeast Asia.

The Centre for Climate Research Singapore (CCRS)’s Third National Climate Change Study[7] (V3), has modelled that extreme heat will be the dominating concern in tropical and sub-tropical Southeast Asia. V3 produced downscaled high-resolution information based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) climate models. Its simulations suggest that the projected number of high heat days (based on the WBGT definition) in 2050 and 2100 will increase multi-fold. This is due to the region’s location near the equator and proximity to the sea, which results in a combination of both high temperature and high humidity levels. V3 provides climate change modelling to 2100 based on 3 IPCC scenarios: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5 — the low, intermediate and high emissions pathways.[8] Taking Singapore as an example, under the SSP2-4.5 (intermediate) scenario, the number of such high heat stress days will increase from the current 24 days to an average of 87 and 142 days per year by 2050 and 2100 respectively.[9] Furthermore, under the SSP 5-8.5 scenario, an average of three out of four days will be having a daily max WBGT exceeding 33oC in a year; and at the upper end, nearly every day will be such a day (Table 1).

Extreme heat projections for Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia have yet to be modelled; however, it is expected that these nations will experience similar proportions of the year with extreme heat, as annual average temperatures are expected to increase over the next decade throughout Southeast Asia (Figure 1). This could mean high heat stress days can make it very difficult and potentially dangerous for humans to engage in sustained outdoor activities, reducing the number of productive days per worker. The potential implications of CCRS’ climate projections for outdoor workers are consistent with a report by The Lancet that the world will see a five-fold increase in heat-related deaths by 2050, and a 50 per cent increase in labour capacity loss, based on current trajectories.[10]

Table 1: Number of days with daily maximum WBGT equal to or exceeding 33oC annually for Singapore.

ScenarioNumber of days with daily max WBGT equal to or exceeding 33oC annually
Observed (based on historical average)24 days
FutureMid-century (by 2050)End Century (by 2100)
SSP1-2.675 (53 to 112) days81(54 to 135) days
SSP2-4.587 (61 to 131) days142 (107 to 205) days
SSP5-8.5113 (86 to 155) days270 (207 to 326) days
Source: CCRS[11]

Figure 1: Mean daily maximum air temperature in Southeast Asia, annual average, under SSP2-4.5 scenario (left) and SSP 5-8.5 scenario (right).

Source: CCRS[12]

HOW EXTREME HEAT WILL IMPACT RICE SUPPLY

Extreme heat is projected to cause crop yield decline, loss of arable land, farmer health impairment and food spoilage increase. As Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand produce two-thirds of the region’s total rice production,[13] this section will examine the impacts of extreme heat based on these geographies.

Yield declines from plant stunting

Rice plants (or paddy) are sensitive to high temperatures. Studies have found that rice grain yields decrease by 7 per cent for every 1°C increase in nighttime temperatures (22°C as optimum) and decrease by 6 per cent for every 1°C increase in daytime temperatures (28°C being the optimum).[14] Timing of heat events is important; when exposed to high temperature during critical growth stages such as flowering and grain filling, yields decline significantly. Another study found that high temperatures (35°C daytime/30°C nighttime) alongside high relative humidity increase sterility of rice plants, depressing grain formation.[15] Another study calculated that a 1°C rise in maximum daily temperature potentially causes a decline in rice yield by 10%.[16][17] Furthermore, high temperatures affect the nutritional quality of rice grains, affecting the market price and incomes of farmers.

V3 projects all three countries will see an increase in average daily temperatures (Figures 2, 3 and 4). In the SSP5-8.5 scenario, the median annual daily maximum temperature by 2080-2099 (far future) would be approximately 34oC in Indonesia, 36.5oC in Thailand and 33oC in Vietnam. As this is the median, it would imply that there are a large number of days – possibly half the year – where the temperature would be higher than those median temperatures. As the optimal temperature for rice cultivation is generally considered to be 25-35°C,[18][19] rice crops will sustain damage. Moreover, prolonged exposure to such temperatures for three or more consecutive days can exacerbate damage to rice.[20][21]

V3 findings align with another climate model used in IPCC reporting, the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment- Southeast Asia (CORDEX- SEA) climate model, which has projected that the number of days with maximum temperatures above 35oC will increase over the decades throughout Southeast Asia (Figure 5). An increasingly larger area in North, Central and north-eastern Thailand, Mekong and Red River Delta in Vietnam, and Java Island and South Sulawesi in Indonesia – all major rice growing regions (Figures 6-8) – will see more than a hundred days where maximum temperatures will exceed 35oC (shown in black in Figure 6) in the near-, medium- and long-term.

Figures 2, 3 and 4: Annual daily maximum temperature projection based on V3, for Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam.

Source: National Environment Agency, Singapore.[22] Note: Time series of annual Daily Max Temperatures (oC) for Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam under the SSP scenarios. The side panel shows the model spread of the 2080-2099 climatology in annual Daily Max Temperature averaged over Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam for each SSP. Solid coloured lines represent median value.

Figure 5: Days with maximum temperature above 35oC, based on moderate scenario RCP4[23]

Source: IPCC[24]

Figure 6, 7, and 8: Annual rice production regions and relative quantity for Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Darker green indicates areas with higher rice production.

Source: USDA[25]

Loss of arable lands

Climate change causes topsoil loss by floods and storms, soil moisture loss from drought, and saline creep from sea level rise. Extreme heat will exacerbate soil degradation contributing to cracking, compacting and loss of soil biodiversity. One study has calculated that cropland suitable for rice will result in a 19 per cent and 7 per cent decline in rice production in Vietnam and Thailand, respectively, by 2028, relative to 2021 levels.[26]

Farmer productivity decline

Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam have 13.1 million,[27] 4.3 million[28] and 8.9[29] million rice farming households respectively. Most live in rural areas with high exposure to extreme heat. High temperatures and humidity impact the body’s ability to cool with sweat, leading to weakness, fatigue, headache, swelling, heat exhaustion, dehydration, muscle cramps, dizziness, heatstroke, and, over time, heart rate and blood pressure deterioration.[30] Prolonged exposure can lead to cardiovascular disease, muscle and nerve dysfunction, and organ failure, and if not addressed, this can be fatal. For this reason, some have termed these temperatures “lethal heat” or “lethal humidity”.

While rice farmers could switch to working after dark or have shortened working hours during dawn or dusk, a lack of light could lead to a greater risk of accidents and injury. Furthermore, the current average age of farmers in Southeast Asia is between 45 and 60.[31] Many are women and children, all of whom are considered high risk.

Extreme heat has also been linked to a rise in vector-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue. An increase of 0.2°C per decade in the highlands of Ethiopia and Colombia has shown a greater spread of malaria in higher elevations.[32][33] These too will impact rice farmer health and well-being, leading to lower productivity.

Losses along the food value chain

Heatwaves and droughts have been associated with increased proportions of oddly shaped crops and fruits which may be rejected by retailers and consumers.[34] Heat and humidity can also accelerate rice spoilage in storage, transportation, and distribution, due to enhanced bacterial growth, especially if supply chains are disrupted. This results in higher rates of loss and waste.

Next, the cumulative impact of extreme heat on rice must also be overlaid with other climate impacts including intensifying storms, floods, and sea level rise; this makes it impossible to calculate the potential losses on rice production. Yield projections are further complicated by studies suggesting that in the short term, increased COlevels may initially enhance rice yields due to greater photosynthesis effects.[35]

Ultimately, however, the projections suggest a troubling future. If a substantial portion of the rice growth cycle is affected by extreme heat as projected by climate models, it will result in sizable declines in rice yields, endangering the region’s food security, and livelihoods in rural communities.

ARE CURRENT ADAPTIVE ACTIONS SUFFICIENT?

While the vulnerability of rice production to prolonged exposure to extreme heat is relatively understudied in Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia, each nation has already begun integrating climate change considerations into agricultural development plans, however these have been largely based on known climate impacts of drought, floods, storms and sea level rise.

Thailand has a Twenty-year Agriculture and Cooperative Strategy (2017-2036) and a Five-year Agriculture Development Plan (2022 to 2027), which is part of the 13th National Economic and Social Development Plan (NESDP). The aim is to transform the agricultural sector. Key objectives include climate-smart agriculture, technology and innovation, sustainable practices and improving market linkages (including supply chain infrastructure). The Thai Rice Department has also recently introduced 10 new climate-resilient and sustainable rice cultivars, though it is unclear what the heat tolerance levels of these cultivars are.[36]

Vietnam has a National Action Plan to Transform a Transparent, Responsible and Sustainable Food System in Vietnam by 2030. Its main actions are to build resilience to shocks and challenges, promote sustainable food production and develop inclusive and equitable food value chains. It includes provisions for improved seeds adapted to climate change, climate-smart agriculture, value chain improvement to reduce waste, technical assistance and extension programmes to strengthen the resilience of food stakeholders, and actions to decarbonise rice.[37] Many programmes have already started and have borne fruit, but these too are not stress-tested against scenarios of prolonged exposure to extreme heat.

Indonesia is currently developing its Food and Nutrition Action Plan 2025-2029. It is part of the country’s Long-Term National Development Plan (RPJPN) 2025-2045 and Medium-Term National Development Plan (RPJMN) 2025-2029. The plan is projected to integrate climate change mitigation and adaptation interventions. The previous Strategic Plan of the Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture 2020-2024 included provisions for sustainable production and value chain infrastructure development. The upcoming plan is expected to integrate more climate change considerations; this is very urgent as Indonesia is the largest producer and consumer of rice in the region.

On the ASEAN level, the grouping is finalising its Food, Agriculture, and Forestry Strategic Plan 2026-2030, which also includes action items on climate-smart and sustainable agriculture,improving digitalisation, value chains, and food safety. Considerations for extreme heat needs to be integrated in these plans for effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

V3’s climate simulations suggest that high temperatures and heat stress will be the foremost climate impact. The region’s governments have been creating climate adaptation plans for the agriculture sector to address drought, storms and floods. With the newly recognised predominant threat of extreme heat, governments should now prioritise plans to adapt rice production to a warmer reality.

Rice production, a key staple for Southeast Asians, will be severely impacted. Major rice producers Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia will see a multi-fold increase in the number of days with high temperatures that will damage rice crops, resulting in lower yields, impaired farmer health, impoverished soil, and increased wastage along the supply chain. As these countries supply much of the region’s rice, Southeast Asia’s food security will be endangered, which may also impact social stability. A case in point is Japan’s recent rice crisis brought on by an abnormally hot summer resulted in rice prices doubling compared to the previous year, raising the ire of its citizens. Even after releasing stockpiles, the government is still struggling to stabilise prices ahead of elections.[38]

There is, however, still time to act.

It requires immediate action to decarbonise as soon as possible and work towards net zero by 2050. Furthermore, access to advanced information such as from V3 could be utilised by decision-makers to identify risks and opportunities, and better justify mitigation and adaptation actions.

Even as Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia are already experiencing the burgeoning effects of extreme heat, there needs to be more awareness of the looming critical risk that is extreme heat, and this needs to be urgently integrated into adaptation action plans relating to climate-resilient, smart agricultural practices. Key strategies must include developing and adopting high heat-resistant rice crop varieties, improved irrigation systems, regenerative soil management practices, supply chain infrastructure improvement, and enhancing early warning systems.

These efforts should not be limited to the three key rice-producing countries, but should extend to all of Southeast Asia. Regional cooperation is key to hastening the creation of robust solutions for food resilience, including enhanced cooperation on R&D on heat-tolerant rice varieties, and improved cross-border cooperation on water security. Countries should also enhance collaborations with research institutes such as the International Rice Research Institute, which has deep expertise in cultivation practices and technologies, and is also home to the Rice Genebank – the world’s largest repository – crucial to the breeding of heat resilient rice varieties.

Climate change will have varying impacts on different locations. An extreme heat event in the north would not necessarily be felt in the south. As such, it will be prudent for regional collaboration to enhance emergency rice reserves, including by buttressing the ASEAN Plus Three Emergency Rice Reserves (APTERR) into a more active, dynamic mechanism. The latter can be achieved by streamlining accessibility to the reserve, developing decentralised stockpiles in ASEAN countries with purchasing mechanisms that are digitally synchronised, strengthening enforcement and monitoring to secure stocks, stabilise prices, and manage stockpiles for emergencies.

The region’s 600 million residents will also need to be prepared for a shift away from a diet predominantly based on rice, for greater nutrition resilience. Alternative staples that are more heat tolerant, such as sorghum, millets and cassava, should be incorporated. Early education to incorporate these alternative staples is crucial; it can be introduced in school meal programmes, health programmes, and encouraged in cuisines. Governments need to work with the private and people sectors to promote this.

Extreme temperature and heat stress poses an increasingly critical threat to rice production and food security in Southeast Asia, with far-reaching consequences for the region’s economy, society, and environment. The V3 study provides a forewarning, and it is in Southeast Asia’s interest to heed it to avoid an unliveable and food-insecure future.

* This work acknowledges the contributions from the Centre for Climate Research Singapore, National Environment Agency for producing Singapore’s Third National Climate Change Study (V3) and making the data available for use, which is shared under the terms of the Singapore Open Data Licence version 1.0, https://data.gov.sg/open-data-licence. The author also gratefully acknowledges the scientific insights and guidance provided by Dr. Anupam Kumar and Dr. Aurel Moise, and the valuable support from the Department of Climate Research, Centre for Climate Research Singapore.

  • About the author: Elyssa Kaur Ludher is Visiting Fellow at the Climate Change in Southeast Asia Programme at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore. Prior to joining, Elyssa contributed to food policy research at the World Bank, Centre for Liveable Cities Singapore, and the Singapore Food Agency.
  • Source: This article was published by ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute

For endnotes, please refer to the original pdf document.


ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute

The Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), an autonomous organization established by an Act of Parliament in 1968, was renamed ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute in August 2015. Its aims are: To be a leading research centre and think tank dedicated to the study of socio-political, security, and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. To stimulate research and debate within scholarly circles, enhance public awareness of the region, and facilitate the search for viable solutions to the varied problems confronting the region. To serve as a centre for international, regional and local scholars and other researchers to do research on the region and publish and publicize their findings. To achieve these aims, the Institute conducts a range of research programmes; holds conferences, workshops, lectures and seminars; publishes briefs, research journals and books; and generally provides a range of research support facilities, including a large library collection.



Hungary faces renewed drought threat, jeopardising already fragile growth outlook

Hungary faces renewed drought threat, jeopardising already fragile growth outlook
Hungary faces renewed drought threat, jeopardising already fragile growth outlook. / bne IntelliNews
By bne IntelliNews July 8, 2025

 

Just 111 of the world’s biggest companies are causing $28 trillion worth of climate damage, says study

Just 111 of the world’s biggest companies are causing $28 trillion worth of climate damage, says study
Gazprom is one of the 100 companies causing $28 trillion worth of climate damage every year, and the Russian state-owned gas champion is responsible for a tenth of that by itself. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin July 8, 2025

Just 111 of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies are collectively responsible for an estimated $28 trillion in climate-related economic damage, and just ten of those companies are responsible for half of that total, a study published in Nature found.

Researchers from Dartmouth College used emissions data and economic modelling to calculate the costs of extreme heat attributable to individual companies since 1990. The findings, based on peer-reviewed attribution methods and empirical climate economics, provide new tools in the effort to hold corporations financially liable for global warming and the ecological damage it causes.

“Here we detail the scientific and legal implications of an ‘end-to-end’ attribution that links fossil fuel producers to specific damages from warming,” the researchers wrote. “Using scope 1 and 3 emissions data from major fossil fuel companies, peer-reviewed attribution methods and advances in empirical climate economics, we illustrate the trillions in economic losses attributable to the extreme heat caused by emissions from individual companies.”

The cost of the damage done by ignoring the Climate Crisis vastly outweighs the amount of money being invested into the green transformation and efforts to reduce emissions. According to the most recent estimates, some $1.8-$2 trillion is being invested annually in containing the Climate Crisis, according to BloombergNEF’s Energy Transition Investment Trends 2024 report. Renewable energy alone attracted about $660bn, while electric vehicles and charging infrastructure received $634bn.

IEA (International Energy Agency) recently estimated that a record $3.3 trillion will be invested into global energy in 2025 with about two thirds of that going into green energy generation capacity: solar, wind, grids, energy efficiency and low-emission technologies.

But this money has been ineffective against the damage caused by the world’s biggest energy companies that have sent emissions soaring to new all-time record highs and the pace of growth is still accelerating. Experts have already warned of “cascading” climate tipping points appearing after seven of the nine crucial thresholds have already been breached. The last COP29 climate meeting ​​concluded that all the climate crisis warning lights flashing red and all the evidence points to the ongoing use of fossil fuels are the main culprit. The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has already concluded that the 1.5C-2C Paris Agreement target increases above the pre-industrial benchmark have been missed and the world is on course for a catastrophic 2.7C-3.1C increase in temperatures.

Who are the bad guys?

The study named names and identified several household names amongst them. Russia’s state-owned gas champion Gazprom and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s oil and gas giant Saudi Aramco were named as the single two largest contributors to climate damage, each responsible for more than $2 trillion in economic losses due to heat, or around a fifth of the total, by themselves.

Other major emitters outed by the reports included Chevron, BP, Shell, ExxonMobil, Pemex, Coal India, the British Coal Corporation and the National Iranian Oil Co., each of which is reportedly responsible for more than $500bn in economic losses.

According to the analysis, each 1% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions released since 1990 has led to $502bn in heat-related economic harm. The $28 trillion estimate does not include damages from floods, droughts or hurricanes.

Lead author Christopher Callahan of Stanford University said the research aimed to clarify the “causal linkages that underlie many of these theories of accountability” in global climate liability efforts. “Drawing quantitative linkages between individual emitters and particularised harms is now feasible, making science no longer an obstacle to the justiciability of climate liability claims,” Callahan said.

The team traced emissions back 137 years using data on fossil fuel combustion, then ran 1,000 simulations comparing current warming to a baseline world without emissions. For instance, they found Chevron’s historical pollution had raised global surface temperatures by 0.25C.

They also used 80 additional simulations to estimate how individual companies contributed to the planet’s five hottest days, applying a formula that linked extreme heat intensity to fluctuations in economic output.

“This study really laid clear how the veil of plausible deniability doesn’t exist anymore scientifically. We can actually trace harms back to major emitters,” said co-author Justin Mankin, a climate scientist at Dartmouth.

As the damage caused by climate changes become more visible as the annual disaster seasons get underway, and the damage of the storms, flooding and drought starts to run into the billions of dollars, Zero Carbon Analytics reports that 68 climate damage lawsuits have been filed worldwide, more than half in the United States. Insurance companies are also reassessing their business models and the scale and volumes of climate related damage starts to balloon.

According to Swiss Re, one of the world’s largest reinsurance companies, global insured losses from natural catastrophes totalled $108bn in 2023, of which a large proportion was climate-related. This figure follows $125bn in 2022 and $121bn in 2021, keeping annual payouts above the $100bn pre-Climate Crisis norm for four consecutive years. The Insurance Information Institute reported that the number of weather related billion-dollar disasters quintupled to 25 compared to just six two decades earlier. The companies are raising premiums and some are withdrawing products like hurricane coverage completely. The Swiss Re Institute forecasts that climate-related insured losses could reach $1.6 trillion globally between 2020 and 2030, and annual losses exceeding $200bn by the end of the decade under current warming trends.

“Everybody’s asking the same question: What can we actually claim about who has caused this?” said Mankin. “And that really comes down to a thermodynamic question of can we trace climate hazards and/or their damages back to particular emitters?” He added: “The answer is yes.”

Global North responsible for 86% of cumulative emissions

While the largest companies in oil-rich countries like Russia and KSA individually cause the most damage, it is the collective Global North countries that are responsible for 86% of cumulative emissions, in excess of the safe planetary boundary, according to a separate report by Global Inequality based on research that first appeared in The Lancet. The two biggest contributors to excess emissions are the United States (38%) and the EU-28 (28%).

China is the biggest emitter of GHG in absolute terms, but responsible for only 1% of the total cumulative emissions since industrial revolution times. The rest of the South Global and peripheral Europe is responsible for another 13%, according to the “carbon budget” calculation set up by the 2015 Paris Agreement. The shares are calculated from taking the safe carbon budget and dividing it into national "fair shares" on a per-capita basis, and then assessing national emissions against national fair-shares.

The carbon budgets allotted in Paris take into account the historical accountability for emissions. As Europe and the US have been adding to the CO₂ emissions since the start of the industrial revolution, they bear the lion’s share for today’s climate problems, whereas countries like China and India have only industrialised relatively recently and so have contributed much less, which is reflected in their carbon budgets.

As reported by bne IntelliNews, although in terms of nominal volumes, China remains the largest emitter, followed by the US and India, in terms of their allotted carbon budgets of what they can emit and still hit the Paris targets of holding temperature rises to 1.5C, both China and India remain comfortably within their allotted budgets. Indeed, it appears that China, the global green energy champion, has already passed peak emissions a decade earlier than planned. India has also embraced renewables as the cheapest form of power available.

The US by contrast, has ignored its budget and “spent” twice as much emissions as it was allotted under the Paris Agreements. Under US President Donald Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” policies of expanding oil and gas production, that deficit will only grow even larger.

“The Global South as a group is actually still within its fair share of the planetary boundary (350 ppm), since the few "overshooting" countries are compensated for by "undershooting" countries,” Jason Hickel, Professor at ICTA-UAB and Visiting Senior Fellow at LSE said in a social media blog.

The worst is yet to come

While the Dartmouth report estimates that the top companies are responsible for $28 trillion worth of damage this year, that total will increase to $38 trillion by 2050 according to another study by Germany’s Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) published in Nature last year, affecting most the countries that have contributed the least to climate change.

“Our study highlights the considerable inequity of climate impacts: We find damages almost everywhere, but countries in the tropics will suffer the most because they are already warmer. Further temperature increases will therefore be most harmful there. The countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60% greater than the higher-income countries and 40% greater than higher-emission countries. They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts,” said co-author of the study Anders Levermann, PIK’s head of research department complexity science, as cited by EcoWatch.

The authors said that without mitigating climate change the economic damage will only become worse in the second half of this century, amounting to up to 60% on global average by 2100 – and that is without even considering non-economic impacts such as loss of life or biodiversity, co-author Leonie Wenz said in the report. Incomes will fall by an estimated median of 19% in just the next 25 years, the study found.

Strong income reductions are projected for the majority of regions, including North America and Europe, with South Asia and Africa being most strongly affected, the study found. These are caused by the impact of climate change on economic growth inputs such as agricultural yields, labour productivity and damage to infrastructure.

The research published in the Lancet came to the same conclusion: the countries that have contributed the least to emissions are going to be affected the most by global warming. Two maps that show those who are overshooting their emission targets caps are amongst the least affected by warmer temperatures and visa versa.

With a 2.7C temperature increase by 2050 – current the best-case scenario – an estimated 2bn people will be exposed to extreme temperature that will push the limits of what humans can survive and indeed go beyond those limits. Of these 2bn people exposed to these conditions, 99.7% of them are in the Global South.

More than 100 injured and hundreds more evacuated as wildfire rages near French city of Marseille


Copyright Lewis Joly/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved.


By David O'Sullivan
Published on 09/07/2025 


A wildfire reached the edge of France's second largest city of Marseille. Strong winds have fanned the flames, causing it to move exceptionally fast. Scores have been injured and hundreds evacuated.

More than 100 people were injured in a fast-moving wildfire threatening the southern French city of Marseille, according to local authorities. 

French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said around 800 firefighters were at the scene and would work “all night” to contain the blaze. He said that if the wind weakens as forecast overnight, it would “allow us to determine the situation in the coming hours.” 

No deaths have been reported by late Tuesday evening, according to the French minister. 

Marseille’s mayor Benoît Payan said emergency services were “waging guerrilla warfare, hoses in hand.” The fire spread at a rate of 1.2km per minute at its peak, he added. 

French media report that at least 400 people have been evacuated from their homes. This includes 71 residents of a nursing home in Pennes-Mirabeau. 


This photo provided by the fire brigade Pompiers13, shows a firefighter trying to extinguish a fire, near Marseille, southern France, Tuesday, July 8, 2025.AP/AP

Nine firefighters have been injured. Residents have been warned to stay indoors and not evacuate unless they were instructed to, so the roads would be clear for emergency vehicles. 

Authorities also urged people to keep windows closed to prevent toxic smoke from entering their homes. 

French President Emmanuel Macron expressed support for the firefighters in the region, condolences for the injured and urged caution and adherence to safety instructions. 

The local fire service said the fire reportedly broke out near the town of Les Pennes Mirabeau. 

Flights to and from Marseille were suspended on Tuesday and traffic at the city’s main station was disrupted due to the wildfire. Sections of two major motorways were also closed to traffic. 

As a safety measure, the city's Hospital Nord switched to generators “due to micro power cuts.”  

Several weeks of heat waves combined with strong winds have increased the risk of wildfires in southern France, with several breaking out over the past couple of days. 

Climate change has made wildfires in the area even more destructive.  

Climate change tripled death toll of latest European heatwave, first ever rapid study finds

A ‘silent killer’, the June to July heatwave is estimated to have claimed many more lives than the Valencia floods last year.



Copyright AP Photo/Paul White

By Lottie Limb
Published on 09/07/2025 -

An estimated 1,500 people across 12 European cities were killed by human-caused climate change during the latest heatwave, a quickfire study has found.

Burning fossil fuels has made heatwaves up to 4°C hotter in Europe, tripling the number of heat-related deaths that occurred between 23 June and 2 July, according to scientists at Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

It is the first time that a rapid analysis - a type of study that measures the influence of climate change on an extreme weather event - has been carried out for a heatwave. Since the analysis covers only a dozen cities, researchers estimate that the true death toll across Europe stretched into the tens of thousands.


“It shows that climate change is an absolute game changer when it comes to extreme heat, but still very much under-recognised,” says Dr Friederike Otto, Professor in Climate Science at the Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London.

“If we continue to follow the wishes of the fossil fuel industry and delay serious mitigation further, more and more people will lose their lives, for the financial benefit of only a tiny, rich, loud, influential minority.”
How can heatwave deaths be estimated?

To estimate how many excess heat deaths were caused by climate change, the researchers first analysed historical weather data to see how intense the temperatures would have been in a world that hadn’t been warmed by 1.3°C.

Climate change - caused primarily by the burning of oil, coal, and gas, and to a much lesser extent deforestation - made the heatwave 1-4°C hotter, they found. It’s also making heatwaves strike earlier in June.


Separate research from the EU’s climate change service Copernicus, also published today, shows that June 2025 was the fifth hottest June on record in Europe, marked by two significant heatwaves. During the second event between 30 June and 2 July, surface air temperatures exceeded 40°C in several countries, spiralling up to 46°C in Spain and Portugal.
June 2025 as a whole was the warmest June on record for western Europe, with a monthly average temperature 2.81°C above the 1991–2020 average. C3S/ECMWF

The World Weather Attribution team then used previous research on the relationship between heat and the number of daily deaths, regardless of cause, in the 12 cities. They estimated the number of heat-related deaths in both the recent heatwave and a hypothetical cooler event over ten days.

The study estimates that about 2,300 people died in the extreme temperatures across the cities, from Lisbon to Budapest. If the climate hadn’t been heated up, there would be about 1,500 fewer excess deaths, meaning climate change is behind 65 per cent of these excess deaths.

These numbers represent real people who have lost their lives in the last days, due to the extreme heat.

“While the number of heatwave deaths are estimated, as it is impossible to get real time statistics, they are in the right ballpark - as has been shown in many peer-reviewed studies,” Dr Otto told reporters.

“These numbers represent real people who have lost their lives in the last days, due to the extreme heat. And two-thirds of these would not have died if it wasn’t for climate change.”
RelatedClimate change could cause millions more temperature-related deaths in Europe by 2099, study says

Where did the heatwave claim the most lives?

Climate change was behind 317 of the estimated excess heat deaths in Milan, 286 in Barcelona, 235 in Paris, 171 in London, 164 in Rome, 108 in Madrid, 96 in Athens, 47 in Budapest, 31 in Zagreb, 21 in Frankfurt, 21 in Lisbon and 6 in Sassari, the findings show.

This means the likely death toll was higher than other recent disasters, including last year’s Valencia floods (224 deaths) and the 2021 floods in northwest Europe (243 deaths).

Although the greatest number of excess deaths occurred in Milan, the highest proportion is estimated to be in Madrid: 90 per cent, due to the large increase in heat that pushed temperatures past a threshold where heat deaths increase rapidly.
Workers operate under the hot sun at a road construction site in Milan, 2 July 2025. AP Photo/Luca Bruno

One reason for this is Madrid’s central position in Spain, the researchers explain. The further away from the coast, the stronger the “climate change signal” is in extreme heat - because the ocean warms slower than the land. Lisbon, by contrast, benefited from being coastal.

“This study shows that every fraction of a degree of warming makes a huge difference - whether it is 1.4, 1.5 or 1.6°C,” says Dr Garyfallos Konstantinoudis, lecturer at the Grantham Institute – Climate Change and the Environment, Imperial College London. “These seemingly small changes will result in hotter heatwaves and huge surges in heat deaths.”

People aged 65 and over made up 88 per cent of the deaths linked to climate change, the study reveals, highlighting how those with underlying health conditions are most at risk of premature death in heatwaves.

In contrast to climate-driven floods and wildfires, heatwaves are regarded as a silent killer.

“Most people who die in heatwaves pass away at home or in hospitals as their bodies become overwhelmed and give in to pre-existing health conditions [such as heart disease, diabetes, and respiratory problems],” says Dr Malcolm Mistry, Assistant Professor at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

But people of all ages need to take the threat seriously - contrary to what some media images of people playing on beaches might suggest. "A lot of people might feel they are invincible, but they are not," says Dr Otto.


European countries are tightening up their heat action plans

Good progress has been made in Europe on developing heat action plans, the researchers note. These national plans set out the actions that can be taken before and during dangerous high temperatures, and authorities have got better at spreading the message widely.

However, to protect people from more dangerous heatwaves, long-term strategies to reduce the urban heat island effect are crucial - such as expanding green and blue spaces – as well as short-term measures like cooling centres and support systems for vulnerable citizens, they add.

Ultimately, the best and most efficient measure of all is to drastically cut our greenhouse gas emissions. “The only way to stop European heatwaves from becoming even deadlier is to stop burning fossil fuels,” says Dr Otto.

“A warming climate sure as hell makes heatwaves worse," comments Richard Allan, Professor of Climate Science at the UK's University of Reading, who was not involved with the "forensic" analysis.

“Communities need to adapt to an increasingly dangerous world through more resilient infrastructure and improved warning systems, yet it is only with rapid and massive cuts in greenhouse gases through collaboration across all sectors of society that worsening of weather extremes can be reined in.”

Dr Chloe Brimicombe, climate scientist at the Royal Meteorological Society, adds that, "Research like this is important and being used more in climate litigation cases where groups take countries and companies to court over climate change."