Wednesday, August 06, 2025

ECONOMIC TERROR AND THE TURBOCHUGGF*CK IN TEXAS



I don’t know what word in the English language—I can’t find one—that applies to people who are willing to sacrifice the literal existence of organized human life … so they can put a few more dollars into highly overstuffed pockets. The word ‘evil’ doesn’t begin to approach it.

Noam Chomsky

Unlike other historical periods of extreme wealth inequality, the added fact that our planet’s life support systems are currently being pushed toward a breaking point adds a new level of horror to current governance by the elites. As Chomsky implies, we need new words to describe our daily and worsening situation.

The short answer to Chomsky’s question is that these people, mostly oligarchs, are corporate economic terrorists, answering to no one as they are executing the suicide hijacking of the natural systems that pilot the planet Earth, in their quest to rule a now-burning planet of their own making. Operating mostly by stealth to keep fossil fuel king, their cumulative crimes over the last five decades amount to a mostly slow-motion, everyday reign of terror over the whole planet, punctuated by the turbo–charged, greenhouse gas-fueled, climate chaos of extreme weather events.

Exposing the Entrapocracy

Extreme weather terror, or turbochuggf*cks in the vernacular, is most recently evident in July 2025, in the human catastrophes caused by floods in Texas, New Mexico, and North Carolina, as well as in the heatwaves across Europe and around many other parts of the world that do not merit media coverage in the US. Increasing in number and intensity each year, such disasters are the sharp end of global warming, which is pushing the planet’s life support systems towards the brink of collapse. Crucial, but absent in most of the reporting of these disasters and climate change in general, is the role of the corporate-powered climate denial lobby in prolonging the shelf life of fossil fuels for decades beyond their sell-by date.

The most profitable business in the history of the world has leveraged its vast wherewithal to assume political, judicial, and cultural control of those human systems necessary to prolong its own primacy, by completely normalizing this insanity. In the face of now long standing near total agreement amongst climate scientists that as a global community we simply need to stop using fossil fuels, the fossil fuel industry seized control of the invisible hand to throttle dissent, whilst slamming down its invisible foot harder on the accelerator of increasing fossil fuel production, driving the planet ever closer towards the climate precipice.

Whilst mostly sticking to the shadows of their dark money universe, these corporate economic terrorists do have names, and they should be made to answer for their eco-cidal crimes. Best in Show corporate economic terrorist is Charles Koch, who pioneered in practice the now much-copied template for bending the US political system away from genuine democracy and towards authoritarianism, and, in his case, in favor of the bottom line of his personal economic agenda.

Koch stands head and shoulders above his peers as a key organizer in terms of coordinating billionaire “solidarity,” not least enabling allegedly competing brands within the fossil fuel industry to work in unison, if not direct collusion, to use any means necessary to prop up the fossil fuel oligopoly’s monopoly on how the planet is powered. Acting like a protection racket, this entrapocracy ensures that the general public’s subsistence needs are largely dependent on an infrastructure specifically designed for the exclusive use of fossil fuels’ key products, keeping us, the global citizenry, largely entrapped, often against our better judgment, but nonetheless hooked.

“Climate Homicide”

The fatal “side effects” of unregulated capitalism are long known. Back in 1845, Friedrich Engels formulated the concept of “social murder,” defining it as an unnatural death that results from social, political or economic oppression, “whereby the class which at present holds social and political control … places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death,” precisely because of the unregulated dominating activities of the ruling class. Engels’s point wasn’t rhetorical. In 2022, a US worker was killed at work every ninety-six minutes, on average, according to records kept by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Jason Hickel identifies a second era of horror unleashed on the Global South by corporate power mongers in the Global North as “colonialism 2.0.” Hickel calls the catastrophic harm to billions of people in poorer nations from the “excess emissions of a few rich nations” a “crime against humanity” and stresses that “we should have the clarity to call it that.”

A joint study by the Harvard School of Public Health and three British universities in 2021 found that 1 in 5 global deaths, or around 8.7 million people per year, can be attributed to fine particulate fossil fuel pollution. These deaths are on top of those directly resulting from turbochuggf*ck weather events.

In a 2024 journal article, published in the Harvard Environmental Law Review and covered by Common Dreams, David Arkush and Donald Braman describe the man-made climate crisis as not only “globally catastrophic” (as the fossil fuel industry has known for years) but also “climate homicide.” They point out that the oil majors have been “technically sophisticated enough to know that they could hide the harms they were generating from lay observers for decades, allowing them to earn trillions of dollars while researchers, activists, and regulators struggled to overcome the sophisticated disinformation and political influence campaigns these profits supported.”

Further, Arkush and Braman contend that, “The case for [climate] homicide prosecutions is increasingly compelling. A steady growth in the information about what [Fossil Fuel Companies] knew and what they did with that knowledge is revealing a story of antisocial conduct generating lethal harm so extensive it may soon become unparalleled in human history.”

Charles Koch inherited a fortune and then multiplied it many times over. Initially, in 1969, as a rookie CEO, he secured control of the Pine Bend refinery in Minnesota and refined the tariff-free, dirtiest of “garbage crudes” from the Canadian tar sands, to become the Koch cash cow for decades to come. Lee Fang described Koch Industries as a “pollution-based empire,” engaged in what George Monbiot and Peter Hutchison called the modern expression of capitalism’s essential DNA—colonial looting— which has made Koch the twenty-second richest man in the world today.

Toxic Business Activism

As if mirroring their extremely profitable and ever-expanding ventures of turning the world’s most toxic raw materials into sellable products, Charles Koch and his brother David pioneered an equally toxic form of business activism, which continues to push the planet to the brink of habitability and the US political system into authoritarianism.

In a 1974 speech organized by the Institute for Human Studies, Charles Koch praised the infamous Powell Memo, which urged business activism, but noted that it did not go far enough. Recommending a radical corporate libertarian vision for the country, where government only exists to oversee the police and the military in their duties to protect the private property rights of the elites, Koch envisioned a world where any taxes on elites amounted to theft, where the progressive reforms of the twentieth century would be rolled back, and where all regulations against corporate activity would be abolished. We can call this Koch’s Project 1974, and, some fifty years later, many of Koch’s wishes are being fulfilled by the second Trump administration in the form of Project 2025, which, of course, Koch himself partly funded.

The political machine he built to this end became known as the Kochtopus, for its multi-tentacled, democracy distorting, and unprecedented seizure of US politics. Call this Koch math, i.e., billionaires weaponizing what, for them, is chump change (the millions of dollars available from their tax evasion schemes) to secure billions of dollars in return in the form of further tax cuts, corporate perks, and government deregulation. Koch initiated donor summits in 2003, harnessing the undisciplined billionaire instinct of throwing money at causes and weaponizing its collective power in the form of what Theda Skocpol and her colleagues called a “donor consortia,” thus multiplying times over what good, old-fashioned, dirty oil money could buy in terms of actual political influence.

Couching the defense of fossil fuel in the broader realm of the conservative tent of rabid market fundamentalism, the Kochtopus became a toxic ideological engineering pipeline, pedaling this capitrickalist free malarketry from ideas generated by paid-for-professors and taught in funded university programs across the country; refined into policy proposals in conservative think-tanks and deployed in the real world in “scripts” handed to paid-for-politicians; all of which were distilled and seeded as invasive species of dominant narratives in the corporate owned media. The Kochtopus’s reach was further and uniquely magnified by the addition of astroturf boots on the ground, facilitated by paid-for-organizers, often graduates from the above network, with budgets leftists and progressives could only dream of.

Promoting Climate Denial

We now know that Big Fossil Fuels’ own scientists predicted, with remarkable accuracy, turbochuggf*cks and climate breakdown as a result of global warming all the way back in the 1970s. Koch was certainly privy to this insider knowledge at the time. By 1988, NASA scientist James Hansen had testified before Congress, putting the world on notice that global warming was real and was happening.

In response, Koch’s own Cato Institute hosted the world’s first climate denial conference in 1991, the details of which remained buried until Christopher Leonard revealed it in his 2019 book, Kochland. Fifteen years ahead of the Tea Party, Koch’s own free-market thought police, the fake populist Citizens for a Sound Economy, led the efforts to defeat the Clinton-Gore administration’s attempts to tax carbon. And the Kochtopus joined the industry-wide pushes to derail the Kyoto Protocol and to prevent Al Gore from becoming President in 2000.

Theda Skocpol and Alexander Hertel-Fernandez document how, by the mid-2010s, the Koch effect operated on the scale of a national U.S. political party … but despite its massive size, the Koch network is a leveraging operation—not a separate third party—because it is intertwined with (although not subordinated to) the institutional GOP … the Koch network operates as a force field to the right of the Republican Party, exerting a strong gravitational pull on many GOP candidates and officeholders. The overall effect is to reset the range of issues and policy alternatives to which candidates and officeholders are responsive.

In 2004, after Citizens for a Sound Economy underwent a rebranding, it emerged as Americans for Prosperity. During the Obama administration, the much expanded group bullied politicians, with the threat of primary challenges from the right, into taking a “climate pledge” that effectively flipped almost the entire Republican Party into the party of climate denial. By 2014, “only eight out of 278 Republicans in Congress were willing to acknowledge that man-made climate change was a reality.”

If all this were not enough, Koch’s key cognizant pre-meditated climate crime is the massive expansion of Koch Industries into frack-f**cking the planet. Its Corpus Christi refinery in Texas, which had focused on light oil refining, was ideally positioned to capitalize on the fracked oil boom of the early 2010s. Despite the well-established and public climate science that recommended remaining fossil fuel reserves stay in the ground, Koch doubled down on fracking, confirming his intentions to stay the course. Around this same time, Koch began trying to whitewash his own image using the smallest of his small change, as the Kochtopus used its massive wherewithal to continue to bully the GOP and the country towards the authoritarianism that would be essential to defending his businesses in the 2020s.

The Other DEI: Domestic Election Interference

Americans for Prosperity gloated over the recent passage of Trump’s Big Abomination of an Abysmal Bill, praising how it “unleashes American Energy” by reducing regulations and increasing tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry, oblivious as ever to the economic terror guaranteed by this implementation of this Project 1974 “economic freedom über alles.”

Koch has weaponized the template for the other DEI, domestic election interference, by billionaires. As Bill McKibben noted in 2016, the Koch Brothers may be “the most important unelected figures in American political history.” The strategies of political manipulation they pioneered have not only been adopted by conservative forces from The Federalist Society to AIPAC, but they also enabled the corporate coup d’état on full display at the 2024 Trump inauguration. The Koch brothers might have scoffed at Elon Musk wielding a chainsaw, but their concerted assault on the democratic process helped lay the groundwork for DOGE.

In late 2024, Connor Gibson and Robert J. Brulle, joined what is now a chorus of journalists and researchers who have exposed the Koch brothers as leaders of climate denialism, if not the scam’s leading perpetrators; yet when I play the songs from my Kochtopus’s Garden recording at shows and ask who has heard of the Koch brothers, very few people raise their hands.

Unable to let go, Charles Koch remains CEO of Koch Inc. Now aged 89, he’s likely to escape in death any punishment for his life of economic terrorism. In 2023, as an hors d’oeuvre for his undeclared plans for life after death, he bequeathed, tax-free, a record-breaking $5 billion to sustain the Kochtopus after his passing. For those inheriting the burning planet that is the Kochtopus’s Garden, documenting his crimes and stopping their daily recurrence is up to us—by dissent, by court cases, and by dismantling the corrupt, oligarchic political system Koch did so much to create.

This article first appeared in https://www.projectcensored.org/economic-terror-turbochuggfck-in-texas/

Danbert Nobacon, Chumbawamba alumni, lives in Twisp, WA. His most recent CD is Kochtopus’s Garden—Now That’s What I Call Capitalism—The Musical. He hosts The Mystery Motel radio show, playing music and talking about current events with his pals. He is writing a book with the working title, Kochtopus’s Garden—The Origin Story of the American Oligarchy and Its Idiot Plan to Rule a Burning Planet. Read other articles by Danbert.
'We're Going for the Full Conquest': Netanyahu War Cabinet Confirms Full Takeover of Gaza


"After 22 months of bloody fighting," said one Israeli commentator, "it seems that Netanyahu has just one objective in the war in Gaza, to prolong the war."


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to the press after meeting with U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on July 8, 2025.
(Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

Julia Conley
Aug 05, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

One human rights expert warned Tuesday that Israel appears to be "opting for a risky and dangerous" ongoing strategy in Gaza after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed earlier reports that his Cabinet is moving forward with plans to fully occupy the strip for the first time in two decades.

In a video address posted on the social media platform X, Netanyahu claimed Palestinians in Gaza have asked Israel to help them "be free of Hamas," and said, "That's what we will do."

"We're committing to free Gaza from the tyranny of these terrorists," Netanyahu said.

The prime minister was reportedly set to meet with his ministers on Tuesday to finalize the strategy going forward, which would include conducting military operations in central areas where hostages are believed to be held—something Israel has previously avoided.

Israeli Army Radio reported they would discuss carrying out airstrikes and ground raids, surrounding refugee camps in central Gaza and parts of southern Gaza where more than 2 million Palestinians have been forced to relocate.

"The die has been cast. We're going for the full conquest of the Gaza Strip—and defeating Hamas," a senior official was quoted as saying in Israeli media reports.

Netanyahu will reportedly meet with Defense Minister Israel Katz and Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, who previously disagreed with the prime minister's plan to force all Palestinians in Gaza into a concentration camp in Rafah—a proposal Zamir said was "unworkable."

One official in Netanyahu's Cabinet said of Zamir on Monday, "If [the takeover plan] doesn't work for the chief of staff, he should resign."

Netanyahu's confirmation that his government is aiming to fully occupy Gaza, 75% of which the IDF has said is now under Israeli control, comes after mediated talks between Hamas and Israel on a cease-fire and hostage deal broke down, and as hundreds of retired Israeli security and intelligence officials sent a letter to U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday urging him to pressure Netanyahu to end the war in Gaza.

The former officials said Hamas "no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel" and warned that further military action in Gaza would be futile.

Recent polls show 3 in 4 Israelis support a cease-fire to ensure the return of hostages, 20 of whom are believed to be alive in Gaza, and the families of people taken captive by Hamas on October 7, 2023 reportedly fear that Israel's takeover of Gaza could endanger their loved ones.

"The best way for the hostages to be freed alive is through Israeli negotiations with Hamas, but Netanyahu seems to be opting for a risky and dangerous military option instead," said Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch.

In response to the reports of Israel's plan for a full takeover, Israeli commentator Nahum Barnea wrote in the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth that "after 22 months of bloody fighting... it seems that Netanyahu has just one objective in the war in Gaza, to prolong the war."

As The New York Times reported last month, Netanyahu has taken numerous steps since Israel began bombarding Gaza and blocking aid for more than 2 million civilians in retaliation for Hamas' attack in 2023, including slowing cease-fire talks even as breakthroughs appeared imminent, continuing the offensive against top generals' advice in 2024, and breaking a two-month truce in March—all while the prime minister has faced criminal corruption charges.

After Netanyahu's government voted Monday to dismiss Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, who is prosecuting the prime minister—a vote that was quickly blocked by Israel's High Court of Justice—Center for International Policy senior fellow Sina Toossi said Netanyahu's actions since Israel began its assault have signified "him clinging to power in dictatorial fashion."




From the time Israeli officials first reported on Monday that Netanyahu would seek the full occupation of Gaza to the time the prime minister's meeting with his Cabinet members was reported a day later, eight more Palestinians died of starvation or malnutrition and another 79 were killed in IDF attacks, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.

In Netanyahu's video address, he repeated claims—recently debunked by IDF officials—that Hamas has been stealing aid provided to Palestinians by Israel.

Nearly 200 Palestinians, including at least 94 children, have been starved by Israel's near-total blockade since October 2023. Israel has killed at least 61,020 Palestinians and injured at least 150,671.

In recent weeks, amid growing international outrage over images of starving Palestinians and Israel's denial that it is targeting civilians with its blockade, France announced it was joining the vast majority of United Nations member countries in recognizing Palestinian statehood, and other close U.S. allies including the United Kingdom and Canada said they could soon do the same.


Senior Netanyahu Official: 'We Are Moving to Occupy' Entire Gaza Strip

"This is a monumental mistake, both morally and strategically," said one Israeli critic. "This will not bring our hostages home, only endanger them further."


An Israel Defense Forces tank takes up position along Israel's southern border with the northern Gaza Strip, Palestine on March 19, 2025.
(Photo: Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Aug 04, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

In what one peace group described as "a direct assault on international law," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided to fully occupy the Gaza Strip, at least one senior member of Israel's government told multiple media outlets on Monday.

"We are moving to occupy the strip—the decision has been made," an unidentified "senior official in Netanyahu's office" told Israel's Channel 12. "Hamas will not release more hostages without complete surrender, and we will not surrender. If we do not act now, the hostages will die of starvation—and Gaza will remain under Hamas control."

A person described as "a source in the prime minister's office" told The Jerusalem Post that Netanyahu—who is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza—has reached a decision to fully occupy Gaza.

The Israeli news site Ynet cited "senior officials" in "Netanyahu's circle" as saying, "The die is cast, we are going for a full occupation of the Gaza Strip."

Responding to the news, Israeli author Hen Mazzig said on the Bluesky social network: "This is a monumental mistake, both morally and strategically. This will not bring our hostages home, only endanger them further."



German journalist Claas Gefroi wrote on Bluesky: "It's so clear. Netanyahu wants an endless war, a permanent state of emergency—and thus many more years in power."

On Monday, Israel's High Court of Justice issued an injunction blocking Netanyahu, who is in the midst of a domestic criminal corruption trial, from firing Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, who is prosecuting him.

After nearly 22 months of fighting a war whose stated purpose is the defeat of Hamas and the return of all Israeli and other hostages taken on October 7, 2023, Hamas remains undefeated and 20 hostages are believed to be alive inside Gaza.

Meanwhile, Israel's 667-day assault and siege on Gaza has left more than 220,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing and at least hundreds of thousands more starving through a famine that's killed at least 181 people, over half of them children, according to local officials.

Multiple Israeli hostages also appear to be starving in recently released images. The Palestine Chronicle reported Monday that Abu Obeida, spokesperson for the Al-Qassam Brigades—Hamas' military wing—said that "prisoners are not deliberately starved, they eat what our fighters and our people eat."

Hamas responded to Monday's reports by saying that "Israel's threats are repetitive, worthless, and have no influence on our decisions," according to The Jerusalem Post.

The Virginia-based peace group World Beyond War said on social media that "Netanyahu's decision to fully occupy Gaza is a direct assault on international law."


"The world must reject endless military domination and demand recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state—its people as full citizens with rights, dignity, and safety," the group added.

More and more nations have been moving to formally recognize Palestinian statehood. Last month, France became the first Group of Seven member to announce it will officially recognize Palestine. Last week, Canada said it would also do so, with conditions attached, and the United Kingdom threatened recognition if Israel does not take "substantive steps" to end its obliteration of Gaza.

Although the Israel Defense Forces are winding down Operation Gideon's Chariots, the campaign to occupy all of Gaza and expel its Palestinians—possibly to make way for Jewish recolonization—without achieving any of the mission's objectives, observers note that Israel is still seeking to ethnically cleanse the strip. It is doing so through forced starvation, one of the alleged crimes for which Netanyahu is wanted by the ICC. Israel's weaponized starvation is also cited in the South Africa-led genocide case against currently before the International Court of Justice.

In March, Israel's Security Cabinet created a new Defense Ministry directorate tasked with the euphemistically described "voluntary emigration" of Palestinians. Defense Minister Israel Katz said the new agency would be run "in accordance with the vision of U.S President Donald Trump," who earlier this year said that the United States would "take over" Gaza after emptying the strip of its more than 2 million Palestinians and transform the coastal enclave into the "Riviera of the Middle East."

Channel 12 reported Monday that IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir recently pitched occupying all of Gaza as an alternative to a plan favored by Netanyahu to force Palestinians into a concentration camp—he calls it a "humanitarian city"—to be built over the ruins of the southern city of Rafah. Zamir has reportedly dismissed the "humanitarian city" as "unworkable."

Echoing international law and voices like U.N. Palestine expert Francesca Albanese, Palestinian-Canadian neuroscientist Afif Aqrabawi noted Monday on social media that "Gaza is already occupied."

"This new move isn't some shift—it's just the next phase of extermination," he added.

600+ Journalists Renew Call to Let Foreign Press Enter Gaza as Israel Begins 'Full Conquest'

"When governments can unilaterally shut down access to war zones," the petitioners warn, "they undermine the very foundation of democracy: press freedom as a check on power."




Anadolu Agency freelance journalist Ahmed Jihad Ibrahim Al-arini continues his work in Gaza to document the humanitarian crisis faced by displaced Palestinians and their struggle to obtain food in Gaza Strip on July 25, 2025.
(Photo: Abdalhkem Abu Riash/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Stephen Prager
Aug 05, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

As Israel prepares for a full occupation of Gaza, foreign journalists have renewed calls to be allowed into the besieged strip.

More than 600 journalists and media organizations have signed a petition released Monday by Freedom to Report (FTR) demanding "immediate, unsupervised foreign press access" to Gaza, which they said is "the worst press blackout in modern conflict."

"This is not a call to be heard," said the renowned war photographer André Liohn, FTR's founder. "We demand that independent, professional journalists be allowed into Gaza. What's happening today is not only a humanitarian blackout but also an information blackout, and it must end."

Among the signatories are journalists from several of the world's largest news organizations, including CNN, ABC, The Guardian, Channel 4, and Sky News, with many of these organizations also signing similar joint statements.

Top names in news media, including CNN anchors Anderson Cooper and Christine Amanpour, Channel 4 international editor Lindsey Hilsum, and Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan have also signed on in support.

Since Israel began its assault on Gaza in October 2023, its military has closed off access from outside journalists seeking to independently observe the conflict.

The few who have been granted access, from outlets like The Associated Press or the BBC, have been taken on heavily manicured tours led by the Israeli military without freedom of movement. As The Times of Israel reported:
These visits are typically brief, highly curated, and prohibit any free interaction with Palestinian civilians—drawing criticism from press advocates who argue they fall short of true journalistic independence.

"When governments can unilaterally shut down access to war zones," the petitioners warn, "they undermine the very foundation of democracy: press freedom as a check on power."

Reporting on the true horrors on the ground in Gaza has been left almost totally up to journalists inside the strip, who have been routinely targeted by the Israeli military.

As of April, at least 232 journalists had been killed in Gaza since the military onslaught began—13 per month on average. More journalists have died in Gaza than in both world wars, the Vietnam War, the wars in Yugoslavia, and the United States war in Afghanistan combined.

The petition lauds the perseverance of journalists in Gaza, saying that "despite unimaginable danger, loss, and now starvation, they continue to document the war with extraordinary courage and professionalism."

However, "while honoring the extraordinary courage of Palestinian journalists reporting under siege," the petitioners said, "international access is critical to provide a full, independent account of the war, and to support those risking everything to report from within."

The urgent call comes as Israel begins a new phase of the genocidal war, which has an official death toll of over 60,000 but has likely killed far more people who are unaccounted for.

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war cabinet confirmed to the press that Israel was moving forward with "the full conquest of the Gaza Strip," which Palestinian-Canadian neuroscientist Afif Aqrabawi called "the next phase of extermination."

"What's happening in Gaza today reveals a far broader crisis: the erosion of press freedom as a pillar of democracy," the petition said. "The people most directly affected are not only the millions of civilians in Gaza enduring war beyond public scrutiny, but also global citizens everywhere whose right to receive free and independent information is being denied."

In recent weeks, Gaza has become increasingly gripped by mass starvation because of Israel's near-total blockade of humanitarian aid. More than a thousand of those attempting to obtain the meager amounts of aid that have been allowed to enter the strip have been gunned down by soldiers at U.S.-Israeli administered sites.

Israel has attempted to deny these reports, but they have been confirmed by IDF whistleblowers, who have used the international press to tell the truth about the atrocities they have witnessed and debunk talking points the Israeli military has used to justify its actions.

"As disinformation spreads and propaganda dominates, independent, on-the-ground reporting becomes more essential than ever," the petition said. "This is not activism, it is journalism, and it is urgent."
Israeli Court Blocks Ouster of Attorney General Prosecuting Netanyahu

"This illegal move constitutes an unprecedented attack on the independence of the Attorney General's Office," said the head of an advocacy group who demanded court intervention.



A demonstrator holds a placard with an image of Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara during a protest against efforts by Israel's government to dismiss her at Habima Square in Tel Aviv on March 27, 2025.
(Photo: Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Aug 04, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

Israel's High Court of Justice on Monday issued an injunction blocking the ouster of Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara after a unanimous Cabinet vote to fire the woman currently prosecuting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for corruption.

"The court noted that no aspect of her position is to be changed until a future decision is handed down, and that the government cannot name a replacement," The Jerusalem Post reported. "The government and Attorney General's Office have until Thursday to respond. A court hearing will take place on the matter within 30 days, or by September 4."

Shortly after the far-right Cabinet's Monday vote, Opposition Leader Yair Lapid's Yesh Atid party said it formally petitioned the High Court of Justice to intervene, arguing that the "decision was made in an illegal process, bypassing all review mechanisms and intended to harm the independence of the attorney general and subordinate it to a political will."

The advocacy groups Israel Democracy Guard and the Movement for Quality Government in Israel also filed petitions, according to The Times of Israel. The head of the latter organization, Eliad Shraga, said that "this illegal move constitutes an unprecedented attack on the independence of the Attorney General's Office and on the system of checks and balances of Israeli democracy."

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Justice Yariv Levin had initiated the process to dismiss Baharav-Miara back in March. In anticipation of Monday's vote, High Court Deputy Chief Justice Noam Sohlberg ruled last month that the attempted ouster would require judicial review and not take effect right away.

Despite the injunction, Axios noted Monday, "several Cabinet ministers said Baharav-Miara will now be boycotted. She'll no longer be invited to meetings, and her legal opinions will be disregarded."

The Post pointed out that thousands of people gathered outside of Baharav-Miara's home on Sunday night to support her and protest what they called "the political and illegal attempt to remove her by those seeking to dismantle Israeli democracy."

Netanyahu has been widely accused of dragging out the Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip—condemned around the globe as a genocide targeting Palestinians and the subject of an ongoing International Court of Justice case—in a bid to avoid his legal trouble at home. He faced similar accusations on Monday.

"Understand that every decision Netanyahu makes, whether it's a war whose aims he has failed to achieve, attempts to gut the Israeli Supreme Court, or now illegally firing the AG prosecuting him, are all informed by his singular goal of staying in power," said Alex Zeldin, a columnist for the American Jewish outlet Forward.

Israel's annihilation of Gaza has been carried out with weapons and diplomatic support from the United States. U.S. leaders have also backed Netanyahu as he has faced an Israeli corruption trial for allegations of breach of trust, bribery, and fraud—as well as an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court over the mass killing of Palestinians.

In late June, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed on social media that Netanyahu's Israeli trial is a "witch hunt." Last month, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee attended a session in Tel Aviv District Court that was cut short due to Israel's airstrikes on Syria, which occurred despite efforts by that country's rulers to appease the Israeli government.
Palestinian Women on Hunger Strike to Demand Israel Return Body of Peace Activist Killed by Israeli Settler


"Whatever the occupation forces will do, whatever the settlers will do, we will persist," said the mother-in-law of slain activist Awda Hathaleen.


Palestinians gather at the community of Umm Al-Khair near Hebron, on July 29, 2025, to pay their respects and mourn the killing of Awdah Al-Hathaleen, who was shot by an Israeli settler the previous day.
(Photo: Ilia Yefimovich/Picture Alliance via Getty Images)


Stephen Prager
Aug 04, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

More than 60 Palestinian women have launched a hunger strike to demand Israel return the body of a peace activist killed by an Israeli settler last week in the occupied West Bank.

The body of Awda Hathaleen, who was shot and killed on Monday as Israeli settlers moved in to bulldoze his village, is still being held by Israeli authorities.

Meanwhile, his killer—Yinon Levi, a notorious settler who has been sanctioned by several governments, at one point including the United States before President Donald Trump lifted the sanctions—has been set free after a brief period of house arrest.


Hathaleen, who appeared last year in the documentary No Other Land, was highly regarded among peace advocates in Palestine, Israel, and the United States—where he was scheduled for an interfaith speaking tour before he was abruptly deported by the U.S. government in June.

Israeli police have refused to return Hathaleen's body to family members for a burial unless his family agrees to hold a quick funeral under cover of night, outside the village, with no more than 15 people in attendance.


The family refused these restrictive conditions, saying: "Awda is not a thief. We will not bury him in the dark."

Following Hathaleen's killing, Israeli forces have also arrested at least eight others from the village—including Hathaleen's brother.

According to Middle East Eye:
Israeli forces have raided family homes in the village each night since the killing, arresting their husbands and brothers and beating other family members.

"A woman would be not properly dressed, lying in bed, and they would come in and open the door and say, 'We want your husband, we want your brother'," Ikhlas Hazalin, Hathaleen's sister-in-law, told Middle East Eye on Thursday.

"Whenever they didn't find whom they were looking for, other family members would be beaten–his brother, or one of his family members—until the wanted person was brought in."

Hazalin added: "I've never seen such brutality."

On Thursday, 60 women from Hathaleen's village of Umm al-Khair launched a hunger strike, demanding the Israeli military occupation release his body and free the eight others currently being held in detention.

"I found him soaked in his blood," Hathaleen's mother told Al Jazeera. "I started calling his name: 'Awdah!...Awdah!' But he wasn't responding."

"I am on hunger strike until they hand me my son's body," she said. "I want to smell him."

Hathaleen's wife, Hanady, said that their three children—none of whom is older than five—have spent recent days crying for their dad.

"The moment his father was killed, Mohammed was next to him, shouting, 'My God! My God!'," she said. "Mohammed is only two-and-a-half years old."




Her husband's death was the result of the government-backed settler violence he'd spent years attempting to resist. Since October 2023, nearly 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by the military and settlers in the West Bank, while Israel has demolished nearly 3,000 family homes, according to the United Nations.

In 2025 alone, there have already been more than 750 documented attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians or their property, which the U.N.'s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) says is a 13% increase from the previous year. Home demolitions ordered by Israeli authorities forcibly displaced over 1,200 Palestinians in the first half of the year.

The eight people from Umm al-Khair currently being held in detention are among more than 3,000 being held without charges by the Israeli military under administrative detention. Meanwhile, according to the human rights group Yesh Din, 94% of settlers who wage violence against Palestinians walk away without even facing criminal charges.

Allegra Pacheco, head of the West Bank Protection Consortium, described the attack on Umm al-Khair as a microcosm of this grave power imbalance.

"The people who were injured are in prison. The people who tried to prevent this are in prison. The people who acted in self-defence are in prison," she told Middle East Eye. "And the guy with the smoking gun—the guy who shot the gun on video—is sitting at home and drinking coffee."

Hathaleen's family says the military's refusal to let him have "the proper funeral that he deserves" is yet another indignity that they intend to resist.

On Thursday, his wife and nieces announced that they would not eat until his body was returned. Dozens of other women soon joined them across the village—ranging from teenagers to those in their 70s.

Many men in the village have said they will also join if the military continues to hold Hathaleen.

Israeli peace activists have joined in calls for Hathaleen's body to be returned to his family and for other Palestinian prisoners to be freed. Over the weekend, dozens of protesters marched through West Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, leading to four arrests.

(Video: International Solidarity Movement)

"He was a great activist and a great man," said Hathaleen's mother-in-law, Fatme, in a video posted by the International Solidarity Movement. "Our hearts are in pain for him."

"We already had dizziness and fainting from hunger and thirst. Doesn't matter," she said. "Whatever happens to us, we will continue until he is returned to us."

The hunger strikers say they hope their sacrifice will put enough international attention on the Israeli authorities that they'll be pressured to return Hathaleen's body and free their friends and family without conditions.

"We will persist," Fatme Hathaleen said. "Whatever the occupation forces will do, whatever the settlers will do, we will persist."
The US Must Understand: The Story of the Gaza Genocide Did Not Begin on October 7

When those who seek to help resolve a conflict are captive to one side’s definitions and perspective, it’s a recipe for continued tension and ultimately disaster.



2021/05/15: An Israeli airstrike destroys a high-rise building in Gaza City, Gaza Strip, that housed media outlets including The Associated Press and Al Jazeera.
(Photo: Nidal Alwaheidi/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)


James Zogby
Aug 05, 2025
Common Dreams

Our understanding of an historical event’s meaning is a function of two factors. The first is what we choose to identify as the starting point leading up to the event. The second is the lens through which we view it. This should be obvious, but unfortunately it is not, and the failure to acknowledge or understand it has consequences in everything from public policy to personal relationships.

This truth can be ignored due to thoughtlessness, blindness to one’s biases, or just plain ignorance. On some occasions there can be malign intent, including efforts to deliberately hide what one knows to be an event’s antecedents for political or personal reasons.

Before examining the issue that prompted this column, I want to share an example. The comedian Dick Gregory once noted that despite what we were taught in school, “Columbus didn’t discover America, because it wasn’t lost.” His point seems simple enough, but upon closer examination it reveals deeper truths.

“Columbus discovered America” erases the history, civilization, and contributions of the Indigenous groups who populated the lands that Europeans came to call the New World. Even the term “New World” was a thinly veiled masking of their imperial self-understanding and intent. “We discovered these lands, and they are ours to take, name, and exploit.”

U.S. reporters appear to be required to include a line in their stories that reads, “The hostilities began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas militants attacked Israel killing 1,200 and taking 250 hostages.”

The American history we were taught was an extension of European history. It began with Columbus. Then moved to the Spanish, British, and French colonialists, culminating in the Revolutionary War and the birth of the United States. The native peoples were treated as bit players in the unfolding story—at times, a footnote, at others an inconvenient obstacle.

This story of American history results from choosing Columbus as the starting point and using a lens so Eurocentric that it only sees the Indigenous peoples who populated this land as less than human and therefore less deserving of defining their own history or even remaining on their land. They were removed and massacred, their humanity was ignored, and their treatment was justified because they were of less worth than the Europeans who displaced them.

This reflection was prompted by the way Israel’s war on Gaza continues to be reported in the press and discussed in policy circles. U.S. reporters appear to be required to include a line in their stories that reads, “The hostilities began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas militants attacked Israel killing 1,200 and taking 250 hostages.” It isn’t accidental that this line (or something very close to it) occurs in almost every U.S. print story.

We all must agree that what happened on October 7 was traumatic for Israelis. It was a shock that their security was breached and that some horrible and condemnable atrocities were committed by Hamas and others who joined in their attacks. But history didn’t begin or end on October 7.

Recall that just a few weeks before that the Hamas attack, then-U.S. President Joe Biden’s national security adviser noted that the Middle East was the calmest it had been in years. This statement gave short shrift to the Palestinian reality and made clear the biased lens through which he saw the region. He was ignoring Israel’s continued economic strangulation of Gaza (which made Palestinians increasingly dependent on Israel or Hamas for their livelihood) and the growing threat of settler violence, settlement expansion, and land confiscations in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

A few weeks after October 7, I met with this same individual and listened to him describe the pain and fear of Israelis and how October 7 evoked the traumas of their history. I told him that I completely understood and agreed that Hamas stood rightly condemned for what they had done. I cautioned him, however, not to ignore the trauma of the Palestinians—their pain and fears—and their history of dispossession. He became angry, waving off my comments as “what aboutism.”

As the weeks and months wore on, when I would write a comment about: the growing Palestinian civilian casualty toll; or the bombing of hospitals; or the denial of water, food, medicine, and electricity; or the deliberate destruction of more than 70% of Gaza’s buildings; and the repeated forced expulsions of families—the responses I would receive invariably included “Hamas started it,” “What about the hostages,” or worse. In other words, Israeli lives were all that mattered. And the Israeli narrative became the only acceptable one. In other words, since the story began on October 7, what followed was a justifiable response.

The Israelis’ ability to control the narrative has long characterized the conflict. They would say: “The Balfour Declaration gave Israel a legal right to Palestine”; or “In 1948, tiny Israel was attacked by all surrounding Arab armies”; or “In 1967 Israel was only defending itself.” All of these Israeli-defined “starting points” are fictions that ignore everything that led up to them and the stories they tell are seen only through the biased lens of those who have imposed them.

This problem of false narratives based on biased histories isn’t just a problem for Israel or the U.S. It is unfortunately all too common, especially in conflict situations. When those who seek to help resolve a conflict are captive to one side’s definitions and perspective, it’s a recipe for continued tension and ultimately disaster.

Peacemaking requires that an effort be made to rise above false narratives, self-serving starting points and the biased perceptions of one or another side. That’s not “what-aboutism”—it’s leadership. And it’s been sorely lacking in the U.S.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


James Zogby
Dr. James J. Zogby is the author of Arab Voices (2010) and the founder and president of the Arab American Institute (AAI), a Washington, D.C.-based organization which serves as the political and policy research arm of the Arab American community. Since 1985, Dr. Zogby and AAI have led Arab American efforts to secure political empowerment in the U.S. Through voter registration, education and mobilization, AAI has moved Arab Americans into the political mainstream. Dr. Zogby has also been personally active in U.S. politics for many years; in 1984 and 1988 he served as Deputy Campaign manager and Senior Advisor to the Jesse Jackson Presidential campaign. In 1988, he led the first ever debate on Palestinian statehood at that year's Democratic convention in Atlanta, GA. In 2000, 2008, and 2016 he served as an advisor to the Gore, Obama, and Sanders presidential campaigns.
Full Bio >


Jewish-Led Protest Outside Trump Hotel Demands End to US Support for Gaza Genocide


"The carnage the Israeli government is inflicting on the people of Gaza is unbearable," said IfNotNow. "For our collective sake. For the sake of those suffering. For the sake of each of our souls, we say NO MORE."


Jewish demonstrators protest Israel's war on Gaza outside Trump International Hotel in New York City on August 4, 2025.
(Photo: Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Aug 05, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

Dozens were arrested outside of the Trump International Hotel in New York City late Monday at a Jewish-led protest demanding an end to U.S. support for Israel's destruction of the Gaza Strip and starvation of its Palestinian population.

The protest was organized by the American Jewish group IfNotNow, Jews for Economic and Racial Justice, and other allied organizations and reportedly drew around 2,000 people, the latest evidence of mounting anger over Israel's assault on Gaza and deep U.S. complicity.

"The carnage the Israeli government is inflicting on the people of Gaza is unbearable. Palestinians in Gaza are suffering catastrophic levels of widespread starvation," IfNotNow wrote on social media. "Israeli troops have killed over 1,000 starving Palestinians lining up for scant aid at U.S.-backed sites. Haaretz reports that these 'food aid massacres' are a command decision. This is an atrocity of the gravest sort."

"Some Jewish communal leaders declare it a betrayal to Judaism to cry out against these injustices," the group added. "We consider it a betrayal to Judaism not to. For our collective sake. For the sake of those suffering. For the sake of each of our souls, we say NO MORE."

The demonstration, which started at Columbus Circle before moving closer to President Donald Trump's hotel, featured remarks from Jewish organizers, commentators, and political figures, including New York City Comptroller Brad Lander.

IfNotNow said that more than 40 were arrested at the demonstration, which the group called a product of "the broadest tent coalition in the Jewish community against the atrocities in Gaza in the last two years, representing the vast majority of U.S. Jews who are outraged by the actions of the Israeli government in Gaza."


NYPD officers arrest activists protesting Israel's war on Gaza outside the Trump International Hotel in New York City. (Photo: Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu via Getty Images

Monday's protest came days after 50 people were arrested at the Manhattan offices of U.S. Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer during a demonstration against the lawmakers' continued support for arming the Israeli military. A day earlier, the two Democratic senators voted against a pair of resolutions led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) that would have halted the Trump administration's sale of 1,000-pound bombs, assault rifles, and other weaponry to the Israeli government.

But a majority of Senate Democrats voted for the resolutions, a signal that lawmakers are beginning to respond as U.S. public support for Israel's war on Gaza continues to fall. A Gallup survey released last month found that just 32% of Americans—including a mere 8% of Democrats—support the assault, a new low.

Meanwhile, the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is considering expanding its assault on an enclave that is already utterly devastated, with more than 90% of residential buildings damaged or destroyed, hundreds of thousands of people killed or injured, and famine conditions fueled by Israel's blockade spreading rapidly.

“We need to keep up the pressure and get more food and aid into Gaza NOW before more Palestinians die of starvation,” T'ruah, an organization of rabbis that took part in Monday's protest, said in a statement. "This event is a mass mobilization of American Jews who object to our government's continued support for the policy of starvation and refusal to leverage its immense power to compel the admission of humanitarian aid."

Reuters reported Monday that Netanyahu "will convene his security cabinet this week to decide on Israel's next steps in Gaza following the collapse of indirect cease-fire talks with Hamas, with one senior Israeli source suggesting more force could be an option."

"Last Saturday, during a visit to the country, U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza," Reuters noted. "But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the military offensive in Gaza and annexing parts of the shattered enclave."
Trump Admin to Withhold Disaster Aid from Any State or City That Boycotts Israeli Products

One international relations expert called it "the diametric opposite of America First."


Pro-Palestinian demonstrators associated with the Within Our Lifetime protest group drop a banner at the Brooklyn Museum on May 31, 2024 in New York City.
(Photo: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

Stephen Prager
Aug 04, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

The Trump administration announced Monday that it will cut off federal natural disaster preparation funding to any state or city that boycotts Israeli products.

According to Reuters, which quoted a statement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA):

States must certify that they will not cut off "commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies" to receive the money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency according to the agency's terms for grantees.

The condition applies to at least $1.9 billion that states rely on to cover search and rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries, and backup power systems, among other expenses.

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement is an international attempt to use economic means—including refusing to support Israeli companies—to put pressure on the nation's government to stop human rights abuses toward Palestinians.

BDS has gained momentum in the wake of Israel's current genocidal onslaught against Gaza, which began in 2023. However, it long predates the most recent assault as a method of nonviolent resistance to Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, which is recognized as illegal under international law.

It is not immediately clear which states would lose disaster funding under the new policy, since none actively boycott Israel. In fact, since 2015, 34 U.S. states have passed anti-BDS laws that take multiple different forms.

Many of these states require public employees and contractors to sign pledges that they will not boycott Israeli products during the term of their contract. Others steer state investments away from funds that do not invest in Israeli companies, stocks, or government bonds.

These laws have been frequently challenged in courts as violations of the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, assembly, association, and petition. Though some have been struck down in federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court has continuously declined to rule on their legality.

Though no states actively boycott Israel, some U.S. city councils, including in Portland, MaineHamtramck, Michigan; and two California cities, Hayward and Richmond, have passed resolutions divesting from Israeli companies considered "complicit" in the country's attacks on Palestinian rights.

According to FEMA's new policy, these cities and others that may consider adopting similar policies may now lose out on federal funds to prepare for natural disasters.

Critics have noted the irony of the "America First" Trump administration jeopardizing the safety of American citizens on behalf of a foreign country.

Stephen Wertheim, a foreign policy expert at the Carnegie Endowment, described it as "the diametric opposite of America first."

Krystal Ball of the political talk show Breaking Points said, "denying American victims of natural disasters aid if they are insufficiently supportive of Israel" was "absolute insanity."

Gillian Branstetter, a communications director for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)—a leading opponent of anti-BDS laws—joked that the government's policy was now: "If you don't buy Sabra hummus, we will drown your family."

Norway Orders $2 Trillion Sovereign Wealth Fund to Review Investments in Israeli Firms


"The war in Gaza is contrary to international law and is causing terrible suffering," said Norway's finance minister


Pro-Palestinian demonstrators, wearing keffiyehs and carrying Palestinian flags, stage a protest against Israel's recent attacks on Gaza, outside the Israeli Embassy in Oslo, Norway on March 18, 2025.
(Photo: Eyad Al Zaro/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Stephen Prager
Aug 05, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


The Norwegian government may seek to divest its state investment fund from Israeli companies participating in the illegal occupation of the West Bank or the genocide in Gaza.

Norway's Government Pension Fund Global is worth $2 trillion and is considered the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world.

On Tuesday, following the latest reports on the "worsened situation" in Gaza—which includes mass starvation as a result of Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid—Norway's finance minister, Jens Stoltenberg, ordered the fund's ethics council to review the fund's investments in Israeli companies.

The fund came under renewed scrutiny from activists and trade unions this week after the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported on the fund's investments in the Israeli company Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings, which maintains the engines of fighter jets and attack helicopters that have been used to carry out devastating attacks on Gaza.

Although Norway's center-left government had determined in November 2023 that Israel's warfare in the Gaza Strip was violating international law, it only continued to increase its shares in Bet Shemesh throughout 2024, resulting in more than $15 million invested—a 2.1% stake—in the company.

Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said he was "very concerned" by the report and ordered Stoltenberg to contact the country's central bank to investigate.

"The war in Gaza is contrary to international law and is causing terrible suffering, so it is understandable that questions are being raised about the fund's investments in Bet Shemesh Engines," Stoltenberg said.

Norway's sovereign wealth fund has been described by Amnesty International as "an international leader in the environmental, social, and governance investment field."

Its ethics policy has strict guidelines against investing in companies that cause "serious violations of fundamental ethical norms," including "systematic human rights violations" and "violations of the rights of individuals in situations of war or conflict."

Following these guidelines, it has divested from some companies involved in the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine.

In 2009, it dropped Israel's largest arms company, Elbit Systems, due to its supplying of surveillance technology used to patrol the separation wall—commonly called the "apartheid wall"—fencing off the West Bank from Israel-proper.

And in 2024, following the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion that Israel was committing the crime of apartheid, it also cut off Bezeq, Israel's largest telecommunications company, which supplies telecommunications equipment to illegal West Bank settlements. It later did the same for the Israeli energy company Paz Retail and Energy Ltd.

However, as Amnesty described in May, the fund remains "invested in several companies listed in the U.N. database of businesses involved in the unlawful occupation of Palestine."

Last month, a report by Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, revealed that Norway's sovereign wealth fund had increased its investments in Israeli companies by 32% since October 2023.

Albanese found that 6.9% of its pension fund's total value was directed towards companies "involved in supporting or enabling egregious violations of international law in the occupied Palestinian territory."

In a letter to the Norwegian government sent in April, she listed dozens of investments: including Caterpillar, whose bulldozers have been used to destroy houses in the West Bank and attack Palestinians in Gaza; several Israeli banks that fund illegal settlements; and other military and technology firms like Hewlett-Packard and Motorola, whose technologies have been used for the purposes of surveillance and torture.

"I found Norwegian politicians, trade unions, media, and civil society to be generally more educated, aware, and principled about Palestine-Israel than many of their peers in Europe," Albanese wrote on X earlier this year. "That is why I can't believe the Norwegian Oil Fund and Pension Fund is still so involved in Israel's unlawful occupation. This must end, totally and unconditionally, like Israel's occupation itself—no more excuses."