Friday, August 08, 2025

 

Towards better earthquake risk assessment with machine learning



Researchers utilize geological survey data and machine learning algorithms for accurately predicting liquefaction risk in earthquake-prone areas.



Shibaura Institute of Technology

Schematic showing different bearing layer depths and its impact on foundation design. 

image: 

By including geographic coordinates, elevation, and stratigraphic information as input variables, researchers from Shibaura Institute of Technology have compared three different ML algorithms (RF, ANN, and SVM) for predicting the bearing layer depth. Compared to ANN and SVM, RF showed significantly higher prediction accuracy for the bearing layer depth.

view more 

Credit: Shinya Inazumi from Shibaura Institute of Technology Source Link: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4990/7/3/69






“A building is only as strong as its foundation” is a common adage to signify the importance of having a stable and solid base to build upon. The type and design of foundation are important for ensuring the structural safety of a building. Among several factors that can affect the design and laying of a foundation, bearing stratum depth, namely the depth at which the underlying layer of soil or rock has adequate strength to support a foundation, is one of the most crucial. This is because in regions that are prone to earthquakes or landslides, the bearing stratum depth, also known as bearing layer depth, serves as an indirect indicator of soil liquefaction risk, or the risk of soil collapsing and losing its stiffness, and behaving like a liquid. Understandably, an accurate estimation of the bearing layer depth is key to designing robust foundations, limiting soil liquefaction risks, and mitigating soil-related disasters.

Traditional methods to assess the bearing layer depth, notably the standard penetration test (SPT), are generally reliable but involve both time- and labor-intensive processes for obtaining subsurface soil samples and are expensive. A cost-effective alternative is, therefore, imperative.

To address this issue, scientists from Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Japan recently turned their attention to machine learning (ML). A team of researchers led by Professor Shinya Inazumi from the College of Engineering at SIT utilized 942 geological survey records and SPT data from the Tokyo metropolitan area and employed three ML algorithms, random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM), to predict the bearing layer depth. Their research findings were published in volume 7, Issue 69 of the journal Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction on July 21, 2025.

“The inspiration for this research stemmed from the pressing challenges in geotechnical engineering within earthquake-vulnerable urban landscapes like Tokyo. As a region with a history of devastating seismic events, such as the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake, accurate prediction of bearing layer depth is vital.  Through our research study, we hope to empower urban planners and engineers with efficient tools for sustainable development, reducing costs and enhancing safety”, shares Inazumi, explaining the motivation behind the present study.

In their study, the researchers initially trained and optimized the chosen ML models using the SPT dataset. Thereafter, they developed two experimental case scenarios depending on the set of explanatory variables utilized for the assessment. While the first case scenario (Case-1) employed latitude, longitude, and elevation as explanatory variables, the second scenario (Case-2) included stratigraphic classification data, namely information about the underground soil layer, in addition to the other three geographical parameters.

During the comparative evaluation, the researchers found that the RF model consistently outperformed ANN and SVM, particularly in terms of depth prediction accuracy (a mean absolute error of 0.86 m for Case-2 vs. 1.26 m for Case-1) and robustness to noisy data. Moreover, the prediction accuracy of all three models in the Case-2 scenario, which includes stratigraphic classification data as an additional explanatory variable, was markedly improved.

Inspired by their research findings, the researchers went a step further and investigated the impact of spatial data density on prediction performance. To this end, they generated six different data subsets with varying spatial densities: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 points/km2. They found that the prediction accuracy of RF model in case-2 improved with increasing data density, indicating that spatially denser datasets are valuable for accurate predictions of bearing layer depth.

Overall, the team’s study demonstrates that ML, especially RF, can offer a much-needed alternative to traditional methods for regional disaster risk assessment. Moreover, unlike SPT, ML models are cost-effective and, with further improvements to the computing architecture and integration with advanced real-time platforms, could revolutionize infrastructure planning in seismically active areas, reducing reliance on expensive, localized tests while improving safety and efficiency.

Emphasizing the potential applications of the study, Inazumi concludes, ”Our findings highlight the transformative real-world potential of ML models in geotechnical engineering and urban planning, especially in earthquake-prone regions like Tokyo. By combining ML with existing geological data, stakeholders can optimize site selection for resilient smart cities and other infrastructure projects, such as bridges or subways, with rapid, scalable simulations”.

 

***

 

Reference
DOI: 10.3390/make7030069

 

About Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Japan
Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT) is a private university with campuses in Tokyo and Saitama. Since the establishment of its predecessor, Tokyo Higher School of Industry and Commerce, in 1927, it has maintained “learning through practice” as its philosophy in the education of engineers. SIT was the only private science and engineering university selected for the Top Global University Project sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and had received support from the ministry for 10 years starting from the 2014 academic year. Its motto, “Nurturing engineers who learn from society and contribute to society,” reflects its mission of fostering scientists and engineers who can contribute to the sustainable growth of the world by exposing their over 9,500 students to culturally diverse environments, where they learn to cope, collaborate, and relate with fellow students from around the world.

Website: https://www.shibaura-it.ac.jp/en/

 

About Professor Shinya Inazumi from SIT, Japan
Dr. Shinya Inazumi serves as a professor in the College of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Japan. He received his Ph.D. from Kyoto University. His main research interests include social infrastructure engineering, civil engineering, geo-disaster engineering, geotechnical analysis studies, and artificial intelligence. In addition to leading the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory at SIT, he has published 320 papers in high-impact factor journals and has also received several prestigious awards for his research excellence.

 

Funding Information
This research received no external funding.


 

The meditation app revolution is here, and it’s backed by science


Meditation apps can help reduce blood pressure, repetitive negative thinking, and even gene expression related to inflammation.


Carnegie Mellon University





Do you have a meditation app on your smartphone, computer or wearable device? Well, you’re not alone.

There are now thousands of meditation apps available worldwide, the top 10 of which have been collectively downloaded more than 300 million times. What’s more, early work on these digital meditation platforms shows that even relatively brief usage can lead to benefits, from reduced depression, anxiety, and stress to improved insomnia symptoms.  

“Meditation apps, such as Calm and Headspace, have been enormously popular in the commercial market,” said J. David Creswell, a health psychologist at Carnegie Mellon University and lead author of a review paper on meditation apps, published today in the journal American Psychologist. “What they’re doing now is not only engaging millions of users every day, but they’re also creating new scientific opportunities and challenges.”

One huge boon provided by meditation apps for users is access.

“You can imagine a farmer in rural Nebraska not having many available opportunities to go to traditional group-based meditation programs, and now they have an app in their pocket which is available 24/7,” said Creswell, who is the William S. Dietrich II Professor in Psychology and Neuroscience.

Meditation apps also provide scientists with opportunities to scale up their research.

“Historically, I might bring 300 irritable bowel syndrome patients into my lab and study the impacts of meditation on pain management,” said Creswell. “But now I’m thinking, how do we harness the capacity of meditation apps and wearable health sensors to study 30,000 irritable bowel syndrome patients across the world?”

Combined with products that measure heart rate and sleep patterns, such as Fitbit and the Apple Watch, meditation apps now also have the capacity to incorporate biometrics into meditation practices like never before.

The biggest takeaway, though, is that meditation apps are fundamentally changing the way these practices are distributed to the general public. Scientific studies of use patterns show that meditation apps account for 96 percent of overall users in the mental health app marketplace.

“Meditation apps dominate the mental health app market,” said Creswell. “And this paper is really the first to lay out the new normal and challenge researchers and tech developers to think in new ways about the disruptive nature of these apps and their reach.”

Meditation apps challenge users to train their minds, in small initial training doses

As with in-person meditation training, meditation apps start by meeting users where they are. Introductory courses may focus on breathing or mindfulness, but they tend to do so in small doses, the merits of which are still being debated.

According to the data, just 10 to 21 minutes of meditation app exercises done three times a week is enough to see measurable results.

“Of course, that looks really different from the daily meditation practice you might get within an in-person group-based meditation program, which might be 30 to 45 minutes a day,” said Creswell.

The a la carte nature of meditation through a smartphone app may appeal to those pressed for time or without the budget for in-person coaching sessions. Users may also find it comforting to know that they have access to guided meditation on-demand, rather than at scheduled places, days, and times.

“Maybe you’re waiting in line at Starbucks, and you’ve got three minutes to do a brief check-in mindfulness training practice,” said Creswell.

Finally, as meditation apps continue to evolve, Creswell believes integration of AI, such as meditation-guiding chat-bots, will only become more common, and this will offer the option of even more personalization. This could mark an important development for meditation adoption at large, as offerings go from one-size-fits all group classes to training sessions tailored to the individual.

“People use meditation for different things, and there’s a big difference between someone looking to optimize their free-throw shooting performance and someone trying to alleviate chronic pain,” said Creswell, who has trained Olympic athletes in the past.

The elephant in the room

Of course, with new technology comes new challenges, and for meditation apps, continued engagement remains a huge problem.

“The engagement problem is not specific to meditation apps,” said Creswell. “But the numbers are really sobering. Ninety-five percent of participants who download a meditation app aren’t using it after 30 days.”

If the meditation app industry is going to succeed, it will need to find ways to keep its users engaged, as apps like Duolingo have. But overall, Creswell said the market demand is clearly there.

“People are suffering right now. There are just unbelievably high levels of stress and loneliness in the world, and these tools have tremendous potential to help,” he said. 

“I don’t think there is ever going to be a complete replacement for a good, in-person meditation group or teacher,” said Creswell. “But I think meditation apps are a great first step for anyone who wants to dip their toes in and start training up their mindfulness skills. The initial studies show that these meditation apps help with symptom relief and even reduce stress biomarkers.”

Mobile phone app reduced suicidal behavior among high-risk patients



Researchers at Yale and Ohio State studied app that delivers suicide-specific therapy



Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Craig Bryan, PsyD, study co-first author Craig Bryan, PsyD, professor in Ohio State’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health and director of its Suicide Prevention Program. 

image: 

Craig Bryan, PsyD, study co-first author Craig Bryan, PsyD, professor in Ohio State’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health and director of its Suicide Prevention Program.

view more 

Credit: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center





COLUMBUS, Ohio – A mobile phone app designed to deliver suicide-specific therapy reduced suicidal behavior among high-risk psychiatric inpatients, according to a new study by scientists at Yale School of Medicine and The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and College of Medicine.

The study, published Aug. 8, 2025 in JAMA Network Open, found that the app, OTX-202, reduced the recurrence of post-discharge suicide attempts by 58.3% among patients who had previously attempted suicide. This reduction is a critical achievement for a group that is particularly vulnerable to repeated suicidal behaviors, the researchers said.

Users of the app also experienced sustained reductions in suicidal thoughts for up to 24 weeks after psychiatric hospitalization, according to the study. In contrast, patients who used an active control app in addition to treatment as usual showed early improvement, but suicidal thoughts rebounded by week 24.

These findings suggest that OTX-202 may help preserve long-term gains in mental health during the high-risk period following hospital discharge, according to the study.

“Although suicide-specific therapy is highly effective for reducing suicidal thoughts and urges, finding therapists who know how to do this life-saving therapy after leaving the hospital can be challenging. OTX-202 provides a possible solution to that problem,” said study co-first author Craig Bryan, PsyD, professor in Ohio State’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health and director of its Suicide Prevention Program.

Suicide remains among the top 10 causes of death in the U.S.; it is the second leading cause of death among individuals aged 10–14 and 25–34, the third leading cause among those aged 15–24, and the fourth leading cause among those aged 35–44. Since 1999, suicide rates have risen by more than 33%. 

Each year, more than 1 million adults engage in nonfatal suicidal behavior, and nearly 500,000 are hospitalized for suicide attempts. Suicide and suicide attempts also cost the U.S. healthcare system and broader economy an estimated $500 billion annually (source), underscoring the urgent need for scalable, effective, and economically viable interventions. Suicide is the only top killer without any prescription products for the vast majority of patients at risk.  

“The weeks and months following a suicide crisis and discharge from a hospital are among the highest risk periods for suicide attempts and mortality, making it imperative to offer effective, suicide-specific interventions during this vulnerable window. OTX-202 addresses this critical need,” said co-first author Patricia Simon, PhD, Assistant Professor Adjunct at Yale School of Medicine. 

OTX-202, developed by Oui Therapeutics, offers a scalable and cost-effective approach during this critical gap.

Testing of OTX-202 by the Yale and Ohio State researchers involved a multi-site, double-blind randomized controlled trial with 339 psychiatric inpatients from six diverse hospitals across the United States.

The participants were randomly assigned to either the OTX-202 app or an active control app, both in addition to their usual treatment. The OTX-202 app delivered a suicide-specific therapy module while the control app included safety planning and psychoeducation.

Compared to the active control, patients using OTX-202 were significantly more likely to show clinical improvement, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression for Severity of Suicide-Change (CGI-SSC) scale. The CGI is widely used because it provides a standardized, clinician-rated measure of symptom severity and improvement over time, allowing for consistent assessment across diverse patient populations and treatment settings.

“Patients and those who care for them do not have access to reliable and effective tools and resources to reduce future suicide risk. This population faces arguably the biggest gap in access to effective interventions of any leading killer. The potential clinical and population health impact of this new option is extraordinary. We are incredibly appreciative of the support provided by everyone involved, especially the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) who provided funding for the study,” said senior author Seth Feuerstein, MD, JD, a member of the faculty at Yale.

Yale authors include Patricia Simon, PhD; Samuel T. Wilkinson, MD; Lauren Astorino, MSN, APRN; Alecia D. Dager, PhD; and Seth Feuerstein, MD, JD.

Ohio State authors include Craig Bryan, PsyD;  Kristen M. Carpenter, PhD; Luke Misquitta, MD; Katherine Brownlowe, MD; Lauren R. Khazem, PhD; Jarred Hay and Austin G. Starkey. 

Funding support: This research was supported in part by Oui Therapeutics Inc and by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R42MH123357).

The study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors, and it does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.


###

 

 

Technology standards currently offer a greater chance of success than regulation



Prof. Urs Gasser advocates a quality management system for quantum technologies




Technical University of Munich (TUM)

Prof. Dr. Urs Gasser 

image: 

Prof. Dr. Urs Gasser

view more 

Credit: Andreas Heddergott / TUM






How can quantum technologies be developed responsibly? In the journal Science, researchers from the Technical University of Munich (TUM), the University of Cambridge, Harvard University and Stanford University argue that international standards should be established before laws are enacted. Prof. Urs Gasser explains why the authors propose a quality management system for quantum technologies, how standards create trust and where even competing countries such as China and the US can cooperate.

Quantum technologies could have an even more disruptive impact than artificial intelligence. This is why there are growing calls to steer technological development in a socially responsible direction at an early stage through legislation, unlike with AI. Why do you see things differently?

We are not fundamentally opposed to legal regulation. At a later stage, when the applications of quantum technologies are more clearly foreseeable, legislators should draw red lines, particularly for high-risk applications. However, in the current early development phase, we believe that a different approach is more promising for achieving goals such as security, interoperability, transparency and accountability: the creation of international technology standards on which legislation can be based. In other words: standards first.

This sounds like we want to get to grips with the most complex technology in history using DIN standards.

Precisely because the technology is so complex, technical standards must come first. The issue becomes clear in the case of AI regulation in Europe, where the reverse approach was taken: we now have an EU AI Act, but standards will need to be developed feverishly in the coming years to understand what the regulation means and what compliance looks like in practice. This can create significant legal uncertainty and strain the innovation climate at a critical moment.

Are there any examples of successful standardisation of complex technologies?

Numerous technologies have been guided by standards on which regulation could be based. For example, the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) has created essential standards for information security, which are crucial for companies in all industries – and thus also for their customers – in the protection of sensitive data in the digital age. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has established safety requirements for medical electrical equipment to ensure the protection of patients and users. And the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) has created the technical basis for Wi-Fi with its standards for wireless networks, enabling devices from different manufacturers to communicate seamlessly with each other. In a similar way, we can now also define protocols, interfaces and numerous technical specifications for quantum technologies.

What standardisation work is already underway and what should be done now?

A wide range of standardisation processes are already underway at international and national level. For instance, ISO and IEC established Joint Technical Committee 3 (JTC 3) in early 2024 to develop fundamental standards for quantum computing, quantum communication and related areas. The IEEE, the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) are also working on standards for post-quantum cryptography, interoperability, security and performance benchmarks. 

Building on this, our proposal recommends the introduction of a certifiable quality management system (QMS) for quantum technologies. This would not only take technical aspects such as stability and security into account, but also systematically integrate legal, ethical and thus socially relevant aspects into development and operation. It won‘t be the individual product that is certified, but the company's management system – similar to the current practice in medical technology. Such certificates could be issued by independent, accredited bodies such as TÜV once a standard has been defined. This would create a trustworthy framework that ensures quality, transparency and accountability.

Given the technological and economic competition, is it realistic to expect an international agreement on such a system?

Standards facilitate international cooperation even where political cooperation is currently lacking – for instance, between China, the United States and Europe. In committees such as ISO, IEC and IEEE, experts develop globally recognised rules that create trust in new technologies and give companies security for their investments. In addition, these soft laws are more flexible than traditional laws as they can be quickly adapted to technical developments, thus facilitating innovation without losing sight of the risks. 

Isn't that a very technocratic process lacking democratic legitimacy?

Standard setting is certainly not a classic democratic process such as parliamentary legislation. Nevertheless, it is not a closed expert system. International standardisation organisations often bring together various stakeholders, including companies, civil society groups, research institutes and public authorities. In national committees that help shape international work, different interest groups are often even more closely involved. In addition, many standards today are developed not only to address technical issues, but also increasingly to take ethical, social and legal aspects into account – for instance, in areas such as data protection, security or inclusion. Social values, risks and rights are an integral part of standards for quality management systems in particular.

At the same time, there is justified criticism. Some standardisation processes are dominated by economically powerful actors, and social perspectives are not equally represented. These shortcomings are well known and are increasingly being addressed – for example, in current debates on the development of AI standards in Europe, where conscious efforts are being made to give greater consideration to civil society voices and fundamental rights issues.

It is important to note that standards do not replace political regulation. Rather, they can precede it and establish a compatible foundation. The actual regulation remains the task of democratic institutions, which establish legally binding frameworks on this basis, adapted to national contexts and societal debates.

About Urs Gasser:
Prof. Dr. Urs Gasser heads the Chair of Public Policy, Governance and Innovative Technology at the Technical University of Munich (TUM). He is Dean of the TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology and Rector of the Munich School of Politics and Public Policy (HfP) at TUM. Previously, he was Executive Director of the Berkman Klein Centre for Internet & Society at Harvard University and Professor at Harvard Law School.
https://www.gov.sot.tum.de/en/innotech/team/prof-dr-urs-gasser

Further information:

  • The other authors of the policy paper are
    • Mateo Aboy, Director of Research at the Centre for Law, Medicine, and Life Sciences, University of Cambridge 
    • I. Glenn Cohen, Deputy Dean of Harvard Law School, Harvard University
    • Mauritz Kop, Founding Director of the Stanford Centre for Responsible Quantum Technology, Stanford University
  • The thesis paper incorporates the results of debates held by the Quantum Social Lab of the TUM Think Tank and also contributes to the new TransforM Cluster of Excellence. The TUM Think Tank brings together science, civil society, politics and business to jointly develop solutions and instruments for pressing problems.
    https://tumthinktank.de/en/project/quantum-social-lab/
    https://transform-cluster.de/
  • The work was supported by the International Collaborative Bioscience Innovation & Law (Inter-CeBIL) Programme, made possible by a Novo Nordisk Foundation Grant.