Thursday, August 21, 2025

  Climate change is on track to shift key tree species like beech and Norway spruce north: European forests will be completely changed by the year 2100



In just a few decades, the climate in many of the world’s forests will be so changed that many trees will have difficulty surviving, according to new research from Aarhus University.




Aarhus University





The tall, slender beech trees with their dark green, dense crowns – the very symbol of the temperate forests in Europe – may have disappear from many landscapes by the turn of the next century.

Today, the beech thrives in the temperate deciduous forest zone, which stretches from southern Sweden to central France. But in the future, the beech – like many other tree species – will face increasing exposure to climatic conditions beyond the conditions in the climate zone they occupy today.

This is shown by a new global study, led by Aarhus University and Wageningen University in the Netherlands. For beech, this means that in the future, summers in much of lowland Central Europe will be warmer, drier and reminiscent of the Mediterranean climate – conditions that the beech tree will have difficulty coping with.

This is according to Jens-Christian Svenning, professor of biology and Director of the Danish National Research Foundation’s Center for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO) at Aarhus University. He is one of the researchers behind the ECONOVO research study, which has been published in the scientific journal PNAS.

“Denmark – in the northern part of the temperate deciduous forest zone - is in a better position than many other countries, but we need to think carefully when planting trees as part of reforestation and restoration efforts or for forestry. It would be a bad idea to plant too many trees from the cool and humid part of the temperate climate zone – such as Norway spruce and beech – because they may not thrive. Instead, we should focus on a broad mix of native species – e.g., pedunculate oak, European hornbeam, wild cherry, and Scots pine – and species that are currently found south of Denmark, such as sweet chestnut, walnut, Turkish hazel, Turkey oak, and wild pear. Generally speaking, diversity is the safest choice,” he says.

The study can contribute useful knowledge to the implementation of the green tripartite agreement. An agreement that, among other things, involves replacing Danish agricultural land with more forest.

“Taking a long-term view is absolutely essential when it comes to planting trees, both as part of forestry operations and from a biodiversity perspective. When planting new trees, we need to factor in our future climate,” he says.

He emphasises that it is important to look at what is being done elsewhere in the world.

“In Austria, they are now planting trees such as Turkish hazel – which conventionally is only considered native further south, notably the Balkans – because the resident native trees that are there are suffering drought stress.”

Population loss for thousands of species

The research team has analysed the current distribution of more than 32,000 tree species worldwide and assessed how they will much they will be exposed to future climates markedly outside the climates they currently thrive under.

“Under a realistic climate scenario, 69% of species in at least 10% of their current geographic range are predicted to be exposed to climatic conditions that differ significantly from current conditions,” says Jens-Christian Svenning.

In these areas, there is a high risk of tree species extinction.

“We’re already seeing this in Germany, for example, where Norway spruce is dying as a result of heat and drought stressing the trees. This makes them vulnerable to diseases and attacks by pests,” says Jens-Christian Svenning.

Fortunately, according to the researchers, there will still be areas left for each individual tree species which the climate should remain suitable. These areas can be considered as climate refugia and can become crucial for the survival of each individual tree species.

Widespread risk of forest death

But even though a majority of tree species likely will be able to survive in such refugia, from a forest ecosystem perspective the news is less positive.

“The study also points to dramatic consequences for large areas of northern forest (for example, taiga) as well as key tropical forests such as the Amazon. Here, large proportions of tree species in many areas will be exposed to unprecedented high heat with a substantial risk of these forests collapsing. Such collapses will not only affect biodiversity, but also accelerate climate change due to the release of large amounts of stored carbon,” says Jens-Christian Svenning.

In the past, biodiversity strategies have focused on expanding the number of protected natural sites. But according to Jens-Christian Svenning, it is clearly not enough if the climate in these areas changes so that the species can no longer survive.

“For forests on the edge of a climate zone, the change can be catastrophic for the majority of the trees, for example if the climate changes from a Mediterranean climate to a desert zone, as is currently happening in parts of southern Europe. Therefore, we must think long-term and in terms of assisted migration of tree species – otherwise we risk major species losses and ecosystem collapses. And at the same time, we must protect the forests that are not exposed to as severe climate pressure.”

Unfortunately, we need to act quickly, adds Jens-Christian Svenning.

“In southern Europe, for example, wildfires are becoming increasingly frequent and severe. Such fires can quickly ravage trees in large areas, and recovery may be difficult due to shifts towards more stressful climates.”

Coline C. F. Boonman – now a docent at Wageningen University in the Netherlands, who was responsible for the analyses, adds:

“Our research maps ‘exposure hotspots’ – i.e. areas where the highest proportion of the local tree species will be most exposed to significantly different climatic conditions. At the same time, we identify areas where relatively few tree species will be exposed to novel climatic conditions. These areas can serve as climate refugia for the world’s tree species in a rapidly changing world. It’s important that we protect these areas from destruction from deforestation and logging, so that they can become true refugia for the endangered tree species,” says Coline C.F. Boonman.

 

Heat-stressed Australian forests are thinning fast, producing carbon emissions





University of Melbourne

Heat-stressed Mountain Ash forest 

image: 

Heat-stressed Mountain Ash forest

view more 

Credit: University of Melbourne






Heat-stressed Victorian mountain ash forests are thinning fast, turning from carbon sinks to carbon sources, new research reveals.

Published in Nature Communications, the research shows forests will lose a quarter of their trees by 2080 due to global warning.

Mountain ash forests are currently one of Earth’s most effective ecosystems for storing carbon – they store more carbon per hectare than the Amazon.

But researchers say these forests will store less carbon in the future as warming causes more trees to die and decompose.

Scientists from the Universities of Melbourne and New Hampshire (USA) analysed almost 50 years’ data from Australian forest monitoring plots.

The researchers found that increasing temperatures are thinning mountain ash forests rapidly, threatening their long-term potential to store carbon and slow global warming.

Lead researcher, University of Melbourne Dr Raphael Trouve, explained that the forests’ natural thinning response to temperature stress means that the ability of large-scale tree-planting initiatives to reduce atmospheric carbon levels may decline over the coming decades.

“Australia’s mountain ash forests are one of the Earth's most carbon-dense ecosystems, but our study reveals how climate warming could turn them from carbon sinks into carbon emitters as excess tree deaths and decomposition release stored carbon,” Dr Trouve said.

“Data collected in forest studies since 1947 shows that warming is intensifying competition amongst trees for limited resources – mainly water – and causing around nine per cent tree loss in mountain ash forests for every degree of warming.”

A projected rise of three degrees Celsius by 2080 could reduce tree density in these forests by 24 per cent. Making up for this carbon loss would require establishing hundreds of thousands of hectares of new forests.

“As more trees die and decompose, they will emit carbon dioxide, with an impact equivalent to driving a million cars 10,000km per year for 75 years,” Dr Trouve said. “This predicted forest loss does not include the impact of bushfires, which is also increasing.

“A growing tree needs space and resources to survive. Under resource-limited conditions, such as water stress, a big tree will outcompete smaller, surrounding trees, causing their deaths.”

Dr Trouve said recent research has shown how natural thinning in forests changes streamflow and water yield.

“Natural thinning of the mountain ash forests will likely impact Melbourne’s water supply,” he said.

“One promising management option is reducing stand density: selectively thinning some trees to give others a better chance of survival. This would accelerate the natural self-thinning process and give the rest of the trees more water, nutrients, and space to grow.

“Decades of research around the globe has shown that thinned forests are more resilient to drought, and the trees in them grow faster and survive better during dry periods.”

Native to south-eastern Australia, soaring to over 90 metres, the mountain ash or Eucalyptus regnans is one of the tallest tree species in the world.

“The trend in natural forest thinning may depend on regional climate as well as tree species,” Dr Trouve said.

The Australian Research Council funded the research described in the paper as a Discovery Project entitled Is climate change altering the carrying capacity of the world's forests?

 

Asia steps into the global carbon cycle conversation



JapanFlux2024 compiles 30+ years of eddy covariance data from 83 sites across the region



Osaka Metropolitan University

Observation sites in Japan and neighboring regions 

image: 

JapanFlux2024 integrates 683 site-years of eddy covariance data collected over 33 years from 83 observation sites across Japan and nearby regions, creating the first large-scale open dataset of its kind in Asia.

view more 

Credit: Osaka Metropolitan University






A deeper look into carbon flux is now possible — thanks to a deep pool of scientific collaboration. And for once, the spotlight is on Asia.

Led by researchers at Osaka Metropolitan University, a collaborative team of researchers from Japanese institutions has introduced JapanFlux2024, the first large-scale open dataset of its kind for Asia. It details how terrestrial ecosystems across Japan and neighboring regions absorb and release carbon dioxide (CO2), offering a long-awaited foundation for understanding Asia’s role in the global carbon cycle.

Across Asia’s diverse landscapes—from Siberian taiga to tropical peatlands—terrestrial ecosystems, such as forests and farmland, play a crucial role in regulating the Earth’s climate by acting as both carbon sinks and sources. Understanding these carbon exchanges is essential for tracking the planet’s carbon budget and predicting climate change.

To do so, researchers use the eddy covariance, a technique that provides real-time, long-term measurements of carbon, water, and energy fluxes between the land and the atmosphere. Whilst large observation datasets exist for Europe and North America, Asia has remained underrepresented.

“Although observations have been conducted in Asia for many years, the lack of standardized data has left key uncertainties in evaluating the region’s carbon uptake,” said Masahito Ueyama, an associate professor at Osaka Metropolitan University’s Graduate School of Agriculture.

To close this gap, the team compiled JapanFlux2024, integrating 683 site-years of eddy covariance data collected from 83 locations between 1990 and 2023, covering ecosystems in Japan as well as in China, Russia, Mongolia and Southeast Asia.

“We are proud to share the results of over three decades of collaborative field research,” Ueyama said.

Data from JapanFlux2024 follows international FLUXNET processing standards, with region-specific adaptations. FLUXNET is a global network of standardized eddy observation sites used to study how ecosystems respond to environmental changes.

JapanFlux2024 provides high-quality information on CO2 fluxes, sensible and latent heat at half-hour intervals, thereby offering valuable insights for environmental monitoring, climate modeling and remote sensing applications.

“We hope JapanFlux2024 will greatly assist efforts to achieve carbon neutrality, improve land-use strategies, and enhance policy-relevant climate science in Japan and the broader Asia-Pacific region,” Ueyama said.

###

About OMU

Established in Osaka as one of the largest public universities in Japan, Osaka Metropolitan University is committed to shaping the future of society through the “Convergence of Knowledge” and the promotion of world-class research. For more research news, visit https://www.omu.ac.jp/en/ and follow us on social media: XFacebookInstagramLinkedIn.

 

Regenerative agriculture highlighted as a transformative approach to ecological farming and soil recovery




A new critical review, published in the journal CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, highlights the emergence and scientific basis of regenerative agriculture – proposing a working definition centred on ecological cycles and farm system outcomes.



CABI





A new critical review, published in the journal CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, highlights the emergence and scientific basis of regenerative agriculture – proposing a working definition centred on ecological cycles and farm system outcomes.

Dr Nicholas Bardsley, author of the paper from the Department of Agri-Food Economics and Marketing at the University of Reading, suggests that as global agriculture faces intensifying soil degradation, climate disruption, and ecological breakdown, there is a need for a deeper re-evaluation of how food is produced and what it means to farm regeneratively.

Drawing from peer-reviewed science, grey literature, practitioner perspectives, and the latest soil ecology, the review examines the rise of regenerative agriculture (RA) and its potential to transform farming systems from extractive to restorative.

The review offers a critical yet constructive assessment of RA’s practices, definitions, and evidence base, positioning it as a farmer-led, soil-cantered movement grounded in the principles of ecological restoration.

Redefining regenerative agriculture

While regenerative agriculture is gaining traction globally, its definition remains contested, Dr Bardsley in the review suggests. He posits that it is farming geared towards working with and enhancing natural nutrient, carbon, and hydrological cycles for agricultural benefit.

This is grounded in research with self-identified RA farmers, as well as soil science literature and agroecological theory. Rather than prescribing specific methods, it emphasizes observable outcomes – improved soil function, biological activity, and resilience – allowing flexibility across farming contexts.

Scientific foundations and soil as a living system

The review synthesizes emerging insights from soil science that challenge conventional models of soil formation and fertility. Whilst it is often assumed that soil degradation is irreversible, recent evidence shows that biological processes – particularly those driven by plant-microbe interactions – can rebuild soil organic matter and structure far more rapidly than once believed.

It is suggested that RA’s practices – such as cover cropping, zero or minimal tillage, livestock integration, and biological inputs – tap into these processes, enabling the regeneration of the “soil food web” and the reactivation of nutrient and water cycles.

Regenerative farmers are not just conserving what’s left—they’re striving to rebuild what’s been lost, the review highlights.

Ecological and societal co-benefits

Indeed, the review outlines a range of co-benefits associated with regenerative agriculture, including enhanced carbon sequestration and potential climate change mitigation; reduced reliance on synthetic inputs, lowering emissions and pollution; biodiversity restoration, both above and below ground; improved resilience to drought, disease, and economic volatility; and possible public health benefits via improved crop quality and soil microbiome exposure.

The review notes growing scientific interest in links between soil health, crop nutrient density, and human health outcomes – highlighting RA’s potential to contribute to broader public goals.

Challenges to adoption and policy blind spots

Despite its promise, the paper highlights systemic barriers to wider uptake of RA. These include the lack of long-term public research funding for systems-level trials, narrow conceptions of evidence-based practice, and policy frameworks – like the UK’s Environmental Land Management scheme – that fall short of incentivizing whole-system change.

Certification and market-based approaches are critiqued for the risk of greenwashing, with the review warning that co-option of the “regenerative” label could dilute its ecological integrity. It calls for place-based support and experimentation, prioritising farmer knowledge and ecological monitoring.

A New Paradigm?

The review suggests that regenerative agriculture is not a set of technical tweaks, but a new paradigm grounded in systems thinking and ecological reciprocity. By recognizing living processes as central to soil regeneration, RA challenges dominant assumptions in both science and policy.

The paper closes by urging funders, researchers, and institutions to invest in systems-level research that reflects the complexity of farming ecosystems—and to centre regenerative farmers as agents of ecological knowledge and innovation.

 

Additional information

Main image: As global agriculture faces intensifying soil degradation, climate disruption, and ecological breakdown, there is a need for a deeper re-evaluation of how food is produced and what it means to farm regeneratively (Credit: Pixabay).

Full paper reference

Bardsley, N, ‘Regenerative Agriculture: its Meaning, Rationale, Prospective Benefits and Relation to Policy,’ CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 21 August 2025, DOI: 10.1079/ ab.2025.0062

The full review can be read here from 12:00 UK time 21 August 2025: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/ab.2025.0062

Media contact

Dr Nicholas Bardsley – University of Reading, email: n.o.bardsley@reading.ac.uk

About CABI Agriculture and Bioscience

CABI Agriculture and Bioscience is an open access journal publishing high-quality, rigorously peer-reviewed multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary research focused on agriculture, food security, and the environment.