Sunday, October 05, 2025

 

Concussion history in NCAA athletes yields mixed health outcomes



Findings counter narrative associating concussion with mental health deficits, suggest team environments in contact sports may be somewhat protective



University of Michigan





Audio 

 

New research investigating health outcomes in NCAA athletes during their first year after leaving college sports found that some health measures were worse than expected, but others actually improved. 

 

The results varied depending on the athletes' history of contact exposure and the number of years they played their sport.

 

"In athletes that are ending their collegiate careers, those with more concussions reported worse outcomes on certain health measures," said Reid Syrydiuk, first author on the study and a doctoral candidate in kinesiology studying at the University of Michigan Concussion Center. 

 

"Interestingly, those participating in a higher contact sport reported better mental and symptom health scores than those in noncontact sports. Further, those with increased number of years playing their primary sport reported better mental health scores." 

 

The findings counter the narrative associating concussion with mental health deficits, and suggest that the benefits derived from the team environments seen with contact sports may be somewhat protective, he said. 

 

The study, which appears in the journal Brain Injury, is also novel in that it explores a period that hasn't been studied much: the time when students are transitioning out of college sport. The research is funded by the NCAA and the U.S. Department of Defense.

 

Bridging the research gap

 

Most studies on concussions and health fall into one of two categories: acute (hours or days post-injury) or long term (decades into retirement.) This focus leaves a significant gap in understanding the health of athletes as they undergo the massive life change of exiting competitive sport.

 

To that end, researchers analyzed health questionnaires completed within one year of leaving college by 3,663 student-athletes in the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium, to assess how concussion history, sport contact exposure and years of participation were associated with their health at the end of their collegiate career, an intermediate time period that has not been studied much. 

 

Athletes completed eight self-reported health questionnaires spanning factors including cognition, mental health, physical health and neurobehavioral health. Key findings:

 

  • Concussion history: Athletes with three or more concussions across a variety of sports reported increased depressive symptoms and worsened neurobehavioral (e.g., irritability, concentration) symptoms compared to those with no concussions.

  • Benefits of participation: Athletes reporting more years of participation in their primary sport consistently reported better mental health scores.

  • Sport type comparison: Athletes in contact sports reported better mental health (specifically lower depression scores) and neurobehavioral symptom scores compared to noncontact athletes.

 

"If I consider why these contact sport athletes report better scores on certain outcomes, I think it could be related to the large-team environments they experience," Syrydiuk said. 

 

The CARE Consortium is a national concussion research network of NCAA athletes and U.S. military service academy cadets across 30 different institutions. Steven Broglio, director of the Michigan Concussion Center and U-M professor of kinesiology, is a principal investigator on the CARE study. 

 

Fostering early intervention 

 

An important practical application is identifying groups that could benefit from early intervention and support as they leave their college athletics, Syrydiuk said.

 

"This time period is important because it hasn't typically been used before in this type of sport medicine research," he said. "It both bridges a gap in literature, which is typically studying concussions in the acute and the long term, and it fosters early support for those leaving sport."

 

Practical applications could include increased monitoring, such as follow-up mental health screenings for identified at-risk groups postgraduation or targeted resources, such as offering access to counseling or tailored transition support programs for those with significant concussion history.

 

The change of leaving sport is a critical moment.

 

"For the majority of these collegiate athletes, their competitive careers end with graduation," Syrydiuk said. "That's a very big change in their lives. We don't want to just ignore them after they've left sport.

 

"If we can identify groups that are more at risk as they're leaving sport versus decades after they've retired, we can intervene earlier and hopefully increase the likelihood of improving their self-reported health. By identifying who needs support as they transition out of sport, we have a better chance of preventing their health from worsening over time."

 

Other co-authors are: Adrian Boltz of U-M; Jaroslaw Harezlak, Chengyun Li, Thomas McAllister, Kelly Mosesso, Susan Perkins and Jie Ren of Indiana University; Allyssa Memmini of the University of New Mexico; Paul Pasquina of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Landon Lempke of Virginia Commonwealth University; and Michael McCrea of the Medical College of Wisconsin.

 

Study: The cumulative effects of a collegiate athletic career on general health measures: findings from the CARE Consortium
 

 

In car crashes with pedestrians, age and zip code may predict extent of traumatic injuries



Adults often face more severe injuries than children, and injuries frequently occur in areas with high levels of disparity, two studies show



American College of Surgeons





Key Takeaways 

  • While both adults and children are severely injured in pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions, adults often face more serious outcomes than children, according to a national analysis. 

  • In another study, mapping the geographical location of injuries in Colorado revealed areas in Denver County most prone to accidents, which could help researchers target efforts to prevent future crashes. 


CHICAGO — Pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents are a common cause of injury in both children and adults, accounting for one death every 64 minutes and injuring thousands every year. Two recent analyses reveal that while both adults and children suffer serious injuries in collisions, adults tend to experience more severe outcomes than children. Additionally, mapping the locations of these injuries can pinpoint where accidents occur most frequently, offering valuable insights for targeting prevention efforts effectively. 

The research will be presented at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress 2025 in Chicago, October 4-7.  

Adults Are More Severely Injured Than Children in Pedestrian-Auto Collisions 

According to a national analysis led by a team of researchers at Morristown Medical Center in Morristown, New Jersey, pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions commonly lead to serious injuries in both adults and children; however, adults often face more serious outcomes than children.  

Based on data from the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP), the researchers analyzed injury patterns using the Injury Severity Score (ISS), which measures the overall effect of injuries using a scale from 1-75. An ISS score above 25 indicates that multiple regions of the body were injured simultaneously, which may include broken bones and severe bleeding injuries affecting organs. The researchers analyzed the injury patterns of 760 children (ages 1 to 17) and 760 adults over 18 using 2022 TQIP data.  

Key Findings 

  • Life-threatening injuries in both adults and children: In pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents, the average ISS score was 28 for adults and 26.4 for patients under 18, suggesting severe injuries in both groups.  

  • Adults face more severe injuries than children: Adults experienced higher rates of mortality (18.8% vs. 8.1%) and other complications, including deep vein thrombosis (3.8% vs. 1.3%), a condition that can cause life-threatening blood clots, and cardiac arrest (5.3% vs. 2.6%). Adults were also twice as likely to have an unplanned operation compared to children. These differences were statistically significant.  

  • Children’s bodies may be more adept at recovering from injury: The authors hypothesize that children may have better outcomes due to their ability to maintain blood flow to their organs and compensate for blood loss following an injury. 

“That children did significantly better than adults was slightly surprising, as we would have expected there to potentially be worse outcomes for children, but it highlights the resiliency of pediatric patients and their bodies’ natural ability to compensate for blood loss in certain contexts,” said Eric J. Charles, MD, PhD, a trauma and acute care surgeon at Morristown Medical Center and co-author of the research.  

However, no matter the age of the patient, the authors emphasized that motor vehicle accidents involving pedestrians very often lead to serious injuries that can quickly become life-threatening. 

“There is very seldom a pedestrian who gets struck by a motor vehicle and walks away with limited injuries. This patient population usually sustains significant injuries that are often life-altering,” Dr. Charles said. “The overarching take-home message is that anything and everything we can do from an injury prevention standpoint and as a community to decrease the likelihood of pedestrians being struck by motor vehicles will likely make a tremendous difference in the health and well-being of the community.” 

The location of the accidents and conditions that may have contributed to the collisions could not be analyzed using TQIP data, potentially limiting some of the study’s broader implications, the authors said. Future research will evaluate ways to prevent accidents, including improved signage, lighting, and visibility at crosswalks. 

Mapping Injury “Hotspots” in Colorado 

To understand where motor vehicle-pedestrian accidents happened most frequently in Colorado, researchers from the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora, Colorado, analyzed injury patterns using the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) database and a process called geocoding, which maps the location of injuries to understand injury patterns in clusters. 

“Pediatric trauma is something we can prevent with dedicated efforts. If we can identify the causes of these injuries, we can work together to advocate for changes in our communities that can help decrease the chances that a child is struck by a car,” said Shannon Acker, MD, FACS, senior author of the study and an associate professor of pediatric surgery and trauma medical director at Children’s Hospital Colorado, in Aurora, Colorado.  

Dr. Acker added that the unique position of Children’s Hospital Colorado also inspired the research project, as the hospital, a Level I pediatric trauma center, treats patients across seven states in the region.  

Reviewing data from 321 pediatric patients injured from 2016 to 2024, researchers compared the rate of motor vehicle-pedestrian injuries in areas with high socioeconomic deprivation to areas with low deprivation as defined by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). The ADI is a nationally ranked measure of neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage, calculated using the American Community Survey across income, education, employment, and housing conditions.  

The researchers then mapped the location of these injuries alongside ADI data to visualize geographically, based on density patterns, where car crashes involving pedestrians occur most frequently.  

Key Study Findings 

  • Neighborhoods with high disparity levels at risk: Motor vehicle crashes involving pedestrians occur more frequently in neighborhoods with high levels of disparity as defined by the ADI. In a previous analysis of patients treated at Children’s Hospital Colorado, the researchers found that rates of auto-pedestrian injuries were about 5 times higher if a patient resided in the highest ADI quintile compared to a patient residing in the lowest quintile.  

  • Two major hotspots identified: Through geocoding, the researchers identified two injury hotspots where most motor vehicle-pedestrian accidents occurred in Denver County: one at the northern edge of the county at the intersection of Federal Boulevard and Exposition Avenue and another at the southern edge of the county at the junction of Federal Boulevard and Jewell Avenue.  

  • Shifting density patterns: The researchers noted reduced density patterns at the intersection of Federal Boulevard and Exposition Avenue from 2022 to 2024 when compared to 2016 to 2021, suggesting fewer accidents occurred at this intersection after 2021. The authors hypothesize that a median placed at the intersection may have helped reduce accidents.  

Studying the pattern of hotspots over time can pinpoint which areas may benefit from traffic calming measures and where rates of injuries have improved or worsened, the authors noted. 

“The patterns in this research may not reflect national patterns. However, the methodology used can be applied nationally to understand the unique context that is contributing to auto-pedestrian injury disparities in other cities and states,” said Emily K. Myers, MD, lead author of the study and a pediatric surgery critical care fellow at Children’s Hospital Colorado.  

Study co-authors of the geocoding study are Kaci Pickett-Nairne, MS; Keren Eyal, MD, MPH; Marina Reppucci, MD; Kathleen Adelgais, MD, MPH/MSPH; Maria Mandt, MD; and Jose L. Diaz-Miron, MD, FACS. Researchers are from the University of Colorado and Northwell Health in New Hyde Park, New York. The study was funded by the Center for Children’s Surgery Ponzio Grant.  

Study co-authors of the clinical outcomes of motor vehicle collisions study are Zoltan H. Nemeth, MD, PhD; Jana K. Elsawwah, BA; Louis T. DiFazio, Jr., MD, FACS; and Rolando H. Rolandelli, MD, FACS. 

Disclosures: The authors have no disclosures to report. 

Citations: 

Myers E, et al. Geocoding and Geospatial Analysis to Identify High Disparity Neighborhoods with a High Frequency of Auto-Pedestrian Injury and Develop Targeted Injury Prevention Programs, Scientific Forum, American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress 2025 

Nemeth Z, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Versus Adult Pedestrian Motor Vehicle Collisions, Scientific Forum, American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress 2025 

Note: This research was presented as an abstract at the ACS Clinical Congress Scientific Forum. Research abstracts presented at the ACS Clinical Congress Scientific Forum are reviewed and selected by a program committee but are not yet peer reviewed.  

# # # 

 

Global disparities in premature mortality



JAMA Health Forum



About The Study:

 In this cross-sectional study, disparities in probability of premature death, defined as probability of dying before age 70, were likely to reflect major inequality in access to health-enhancing technologies and living standards, as well as context-specific obstacles. Technological and  medical advancements leading to universal health benefits need to be rapidly and fairly disseminated.



Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Omar Karlsson, PhD, email karlssono@outlook.com.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3479)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3479?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=100325

About JAMA Health Forum: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports and opinion about national and global health policy; innovative approaches to health care delivery; and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity and reform. Its distribution will be solely digital and all content will be freely available for anyone to read.


How better software choices could cut US health care costs



To reduce claim denials and ensure providers are compensated, hospitals and clinics should ensure their software are compatible, according to a Rutgers researcher



Rutgers University





Denied insurance claims are among the biggest challenges facing the U.S. health care system – driving up costs and leaving providers with billions in unpaid bills.

 

Hilal Atasoy, an associate professor at the Rutgers Business School, thinks she’s uncovered an elegant if simple solution: better software management. Her paper on the topic appears in the September issue of the journal MIS Quarterly.

 

Medical claims contain a range of information, including patient demographics, medications, medical histories and procedures performed. Claims can be denied when they include erroneous information or uncovered services, among other errors.

 

To strengthen the quality of health data that doctors collect, in 2009, U.S. lawmakers adopted the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, which incentivized the use of electronic health record (EHR) systems. The goal – lauded at the time – was to make technology the “foundation for health care reform.”

 

It was only partially successful. While the move incentivized adoption, the resulting mix of systems from different vendors created interoperability challenges that can contribute to claim denials, Atasoy said. When software used by one clinic or hospital system differs from another, patient data can get jumbled or go missing – making denials more likely.

 

Between 2000 and 2020, some $745 billion worth of care was provided without compensation, and claim denials were a significant contributor. Atasoy wanted to understand the potential role that EHR technologies played in these health payer rejections. 

 

To quantify the connection between unpaid bills and gaps in software interoperability, Atasoy and colleagues from Temple University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison analyzed the health records of more than 19 million anonymized patient visits to 48 Maryland hospitals. The dataset included information on whether initial claims were approved or rejected.

 

By comparing this data with information on EHR adoption and software sourcing, the researchers determined that software decisions play an outsized role in whether claims are initially approved or denied. The dataset did not capture appeals or eventual resubmissions.

 

For instance, they found that when hospitals relied on multiple vendors rather than a single vendor, claim denials rose. By contrast, hospitals that standardized software from a single vendor saw denials decrease to 1.03% from 1.18% — a seemingly small shift that translates into significant savings across millions of claims.

 

The researchers also investigated whether physicians’ familiarity with EHR applications from different vendors could explain claim denials. They found that when physicians practiced across hospitals with similar EHR systems, claim denials decreased, since familiarity improved data accuracy and compliance.

 

“Our findings suggest that [EHR] alignment improves clinical data collection and adherence to payer requirements, ultimately reducing claim denials,” they wrote.

 

Reducing the cost of health care in the U.S. will require a basket of solutions; technology is only part of the answer. And yet, as the researchers found, EHR coordination has the potential to reduce unnecessary spending, and in turn, bring costs back down to earth.

 

“If there is any inefficiency in this process, that can lead to surprise bills for clinics and health care organizations, which in turn shifts the cost burden to patients and eventually, to taxpayers,” said Atasoy. “Reducing denials is among the best ways to help contain skyrocketing health care costs.”

 

The findings suggest that the federal government should work to strengthen EHR certification and minimize variation among vendors, Atasoy added.

 

“Placing greater emphasis on the usability and standardization of user interfaces and layouts will improve the accuracy of information flow across disparate applications, suggesting a potential to reduce the extent of errors in claim processing,” the researchers wrote.