Thursday, October 16, 2025

Toronto renters should make about $44 hourly to comfortably afford a one-bedroom apartment: report

By Alex Arsenych
 October 16, 2025 



If a renter in Toronto wants to dedicate about a third of their paycheque to a one-bedroom apartment each month, they should be making roughly $44 an hour.

That’s according to Zoocasa, a real estate website, which crunched the numbers after several provinces recently raised their minimum wages to keep pace with the rising cost of living.

As of Oct. 1, Ontario raised that wage to $17.60 per hour, reflecting a $0.40 increase from the previous rate.READ MORE: Ontario’s minimum wage is rising in October. But is it enough for workers to support themselves full-time?

Zoocasa analyzed data from Rentals.ca across 51 Canadian cities to reveal what a single earner should make at minimum to rent a one-bedroom apartment affordably under the 32 per cent rule.

Typically, the “golden rule” of budgeting for housing costs is touted as spending no more than 32 per cent of your gross annual income, according to Zoocasa.


“It’s a standard that’s supposed to leave room for food, transportation, savings, and a little breathing room for the unexpected,” the report reads.

Assuming minimum wage employees work 37.5 hours every week, Ontarians would bring home a $31,680 pre-tax annual income, making their ideal rent roughly $845 per month.

But Zoocasa’s report reveals the average rent for a one-bedroom unit in Toronto costs about $2,295, which is nearly triple the amount of what full-time minimum wage earners can comfortably afford on their own.

Torontonians should be making at least $86,062 annually, or $44.13 hourly, if they want to rent a one-bedroom apartment on their own, according to the study. That figure is 151 per cent higher than the province’s new minimum wage.

Across the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), North York renters would need to earn $41.62 per hour; Mississauga calls for $41.12 per hour, while Brampton renters need $39.38 hourly to afford the same units. These figures represent wage gaps from 124 to 137 per cent.

Outside of the GTA, renters in Greater Sudbury need $40.93 an hour, Waterloo renters need $39.42 per hour, and London renters need $32.96 per hour, reflecting wage gaps ranging from 87 to 133 per cent. This reveals cities once painted as an affordable housing option are currently inaccessible to full-time minimum wage earners, Zoocasa notes.

“Ontario’s housing costs continue to outpace wage growth at nearly every level, confirming that incremental wage adjustments are insufficient to bridge the affordability gap,” the report reads.

Here is how much rent costs for one-bedroom units across Ontario in October and the required income to comfortably afford them on a single income:



CityAverage rent in OctoberRequired annual incomeRequired hourly wage
Toronto$2,295$86,062$44.13
Oakville$2,226$83,475$42.81
Kanata$2,221$83,288$42.71
Etobicoke$2,183$81,862$41.98
North York$2,164$81,150$41.62
Mississauga$2,138$80,175$41.12
Greater Sudbury$2,129$79,838$40.94
Kingston$2,122$79,575$40.81
Vaughan$2,120$79,500$40.77
Burlington$2,094$78,525$40.27
Scarborough$2,055$77,062$39.52
Waterloo$2,050$76,875$39.42
Brampton$2,048$76,800$39.38
Guelph$2,009$75,338$38.63
Barrie$1,979$74,212$38.06
Ottawa$1,977$74,138$38.02
Ajax$1,954$73,275$37.58
East York$1,940$72,750$37.31
Cambridge$1,880$70,500$36.15
Kitchener$1,836$68,850$35.51
Oshawa$1,821$68,288$35.02
Brantford$1,720$68,250$35.00
Hamilton$1,787$67,012$34.15
London$1,714$64,275$32.96
Niagara Falls$1,694$63,525$32.58
Windsor$1,685$63,188$32.40
St. Catharines$1,676$62,850$32.23
Peterborough$1,668$62,550$32.08



Alex Arsenych

Opens in new window

CTVNewsToronto.ca Journalist

‘Hold them to account’: Joly threatens legal action against Stellantis over Jeep production shift to U.S.

NATIONALIZE JEEP UNDER WORKERS CONTROL


By Stephanie Ha
Updated: October 15, 2025
The Stellantis sign is seen outside the Chrysler Technology Center, Jan. 19, 2021, in Auburn Hills, Mich. Stellantis on April 26, 2023. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio, File)

Less than 24 hours after automaker Stellantis announced that it is shifting production of the Jeep Compass from Ontario to the U.S., the federal government says it’s considering taking legal action against the company.

In a letter to Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly emphasized that Stellantis has “made important commitments to Canada and to its workforce.”

“Should Stellantis choose not to respect its obligations, we will act in the interests of all Canadians and hold the company to full account, and exercise all options, including legal,” the letter goes on to say.

Bloomberg was first to report on the threat of legal action.

On Tuesday, Stellantis announced it would be shifting Jeep production slated for its Brampton, Ont. plant to its Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois, creating 3,300 new jobs in the U.S. by 2027. The announcement was part of a US$13-billion investment by Stellantis to expand production in the U.S. over the next four years.


Speaking to reporters in Fredericton, N.B. on Wednesday, Joly said she spoke to Stellantis’ CEO the day before.

“We’ve invested millions of dollars in that facility based on the commitment that they would be investing in a new model,” Joly said to reporters. “And so that’s why, if they don’t do so, we’ll hold them to account.”

Federal Industry Minister Melanie Joly says the decision by automotive plant Stellantis to move its planned production of its Jeep Compass from Brampton, Ont., to Illinois is completely unacceptable. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Hina Alam

In 2022, Stellantis committed C$3.6 billion to retool the Brampton and Windsor, Ont. assembly plants to align with the company’s electric vehicle and battery development goals. Both the federal and provincial governments then committed C$1.4 billion for the upgrade, to total C$5 billion.

In her letter to Stellantis, Joly highlighted the funding provided to the company by both Ottawa and Ontario.

“Stellantis agreed with the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario to maintain its full Canadian footprint, including Brampton, in exchange for substantial financial support,” Joly wrote.

“Anything short of fulfilling that commitment will be considered as default under our agreements,” she added.

Work at the Stellantis plant in Brampton was put on pause in February amid threats from U.S. President Donald Trump to impose tariffs on Canadian goods. That work has not resumed. The automaker’s facility in Windsor, meanwhile, is still expanding to produce electric vehicle batteries.

Joly is also calling on the company to quickly “identify new mandates for Brampton that ensure the facility remains central” to the company.


Ontario Premier Doug Ford says Stellantis has given him assurances that the Brampton plant will continue operations in the future. (CTV News)

Ontario Premier Doug Ford says Stellantis has given him assurances that the Brampton plant will continue operations in the future.

“I had a conversation with the president of Stellantis yesterday,” Ford said to reporters in Kenora, Ont. on Wednesday. “He said, well, they are going to postpone it for a year. They are going to find a new model.”

Ford also said there are plans to add a third shift in Windsor that would potentially allow 1,500 of the 3,000 impacted employees to transfer to that facility.

In a statement to CTV News Toronto, Stellantis said Canada is “very important” to the company, pointing to its 100-year history in the country.

“We are investing. We are adding a third shift to the Windsor Assembly Plant to support increased demand of all versions of the Chrysler Pacifica and the new SIXPACK-powered Dodge Charger Scat Pack and R/T models,” the company wrote.

“We have plans for Brampton and will share them upon further discussions with the Canadian government.”

Since his re-election, Trump has reiterated his desire to move vehicle production back to the U.S. to help revive manufacturing and provide more jobs for Americans.

Last week, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick dismissed any prospect of a comprehensive auto deal with Canada while speaking under Chatham House Rules at the US-Canada Summit hosted by BMO and Eurasia Group in Toronto.

Earlier this year, Trump imposed a 25 per cent tariff on all vehicle imports to the U.S., but made a carveout for the American-made parts of cars compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).

With files from CP24’s Codi Wilson and CTV News’ Spencer Van Dyk

Stephanie Ha

Supervising Producer, Ottawa News Bureau, CTV News


Stellantis to pour €11bn into US expansion to avoid tariff-induced losses

FILE - Shoppers look over a 2025 Dodge Charger Daytona hardtop in the Stellantis display at the Colorado Auto Show on 17 April 2025, in Denver.
Copyright Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

By Una Hajdari with AP
Published on 

The car giant says its biggest-ever US investment will increase output by 50%, add more than 5,000 jobs, and counter some tariff costs by boosting North American profitability.

Stellantis says it will invest $13 billion (€11.17bn) over the next four years to expand its manufacturing capacity in the United States, a move the carmaker says will lift its domestic vehicle output by 50% and create more than 5,000 jobs.

The world’s fourth-largest carmaker said on Tuesday the investment will support the launch of five new models, including a Dodge Durango to be built in Detroit and a mid-size truck to be assembled in Toledo, Ohio.

The new jobs will be spread across plants in Illinois, Ohio, Michigan and Indiana.

Stellantis, formed four and a half years ago from the merger of Fiat Chrysler and PSA Peugeot, hopes to offset some of the expected €1.5bn cost of tariffs this year on cars produced in Canada and Mexico by boosting North American profitability with new model launches such as the revived Jeep Cherokee.

The new products will come on top of 19 ‘refreshed’ models across all US assembly plants planned through 2029, the company said.

“This investment in the US — the single largest in the company’s history — will drive our growth, strengthen our manufacturing footprint and bring more American jobs to the states we call home,” chief executive Antonio Filosa said in a statement.

Stellantis’ US operations include 34 manufacturing plants, parts distribution centres, and research and development sites across 14 states.

Of the 16 million cars Stellantis produces for sale in the US market, 8 million are made in domestic plants and another 4 million in Canada and Mexico — all with a high proportion of US components. A further 4 million are imported from Europe and Asia, with virtually no US components.

In pursuit of a US turnaround, Filosa is also relaunching in the second half of 2025 models that previous management scrapped two years ago, including a new Jeep Cherokee, which will be built in Mexico, and the popular ICE (internal combustion engine) Dodge Charger.

Earlier this year, Stellantis also brought back the Ram Hemi V8 in response to dealer and customer demand.

In July, the Netherlands-based group reported half-year results that included losses of €2.3bn. During the period, US shipments fell by nearly a quarter as the carmaker reduced imports of vehicles produced abroad.

How Will U.S. Tariffs Reshape the Global Auto Industry?


  • The U.S. government has implemented a 15% tariff on European auto imports, including parts, retroactive to August 1.

  • The move follows a reciprocal trade agreement framework with the EU that lowered European tariffs on U.S. goods.

  • European automakers, including Volkswagen, saw share prices rise on the news despite ongoing competition from Chinese vehicle imports.

In a move with major implications for the global automotive industry, the U.S. federal government has implemented a 15% import tariff on auto imports from the European Union. According to a federal register notice from September 24, the move affects cars as well as auto parts. That notice went on to indicate that the duties are also retroactive to August 1.

The Move Follows a Protracted Negotiation

The new tariff follows an August 21 announcement by the United States and the EU regarding a “Framework for an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair and Balanced Trade.” Previously, imports from the 27-member trading bloc had faced duties up to 25%. “Most of the new rates take effect for EU goods shipped starting September 1, but the relief for automobiles and parts was contingent on the EU introducing legislation to lower tariffs on American goods,” business daily The Irish Times reported in a September 24 announcement.

“The bloc followed through with that action on August 28, paving the way for the Trump administration to backdate the new auto charge,” the publication added.

EU Automotive Industry Reacts Positively

Reports indicate that German automakers’ share prices gained on the news. Volkswagen’s share price on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange finished September 24 at €93.40 ($109.28), up 3.2% from €90.50 ($105.91) on September 22. Data on the bourse indicates that the latest price is up over 12.6% from the April 8 low of €82.92 ($97.03).

The European automotive industry has also faced pressure from imports of Chinese vehicles, including high-end passenger cars, small utility trucks, and coaches, which in some cases have been over 20% cheaper than domestically produced units.

In its H1 report, the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) stated that the United States is the second-largest export market for EU automakers in terms of value, after the United Kingdom. Citing Eurostat data, the association shows that exports to the United States totaled almost €17.3 billion ($20.2 billion) in the first six months of 2025, off 13.6% from slightly over €20 billion ($23.4 billion).

The ACEA added that the United States occupied third place in terms of volume, with an 8.9% decrease to 351,264 units from 305,701 units. High tariffs originally imposed by the Trump administration, as well as resulting uncertainty in supply chains, were behind the declines.

By Metal Miner

Montana Judge Throws Out Climate Lawsuit

A judge in Montana has dismissed a lawsuit brought by a youth organization and targeting the Trump presidency for pivoting away from decarbonization to more hydrocarbon production.

Per an AP report, Judge Dana Christensen said the plaintiffs, led by NGO Our Children’s Trust, had shown “overwhelming” evidence that climate change was affecting their well-being and its effect was going to get worse but said it was not the court’s job to create climate policies.

“This court would be required to monitor an untold number of federal agency actions to determine whether they contravene its injunction. This is, quite simply, an unworkable request for which plaintiffs provide no precedent,” Judge Christensen said, as quoted by Reuters.

Our Children’s Trust specializes in climate change-based lawsuits brought to court by young people, often large groups of them.

“Every day these executive orders remain in effect, these 22 young Americans suffer irreparable harm to their health, safety, and future,” Julia Olson, chief legal counsel at the legal nonprofit, said. “The judge recognized that the government’s fossil fuel directives are injuring these youth, but said his hands were tied.”

Youth-led climate lawsuits allege that climate change—and government policies that do not focus on arresting this change—are robbing the plaintiffs of a future and interfering with their well-being at the moment by violating their right to things such as clean air and water.

Courts have become the go-to venue for critics of President Trump’s policies due to the lack of many other alternatives. For now, the results are mixed, with some courts siding with some of the Trump administration’s challengers and ruling against others.

Our Children’s Trust said they would appeal the Christensen ruling immediately. “We will appeal — because courts cannot offer more protection to fossil fuel companies seeking to preserve their profits than to young Americans seeking to preserve their right, the NGO’s chief legal counsel said.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

SOLIDARITY

Mexico Sends $3 Billion in Subsidized Fuel to Cuba in Just Four Months

Between May and August 2025, Mexico shipped more than $3 billion worth of subsidized fuel to Cuba through Gasolinas Bienestar, a subsidiary of state oil company Pemex, according to an investigation by Mexicanos Contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad (MCCI). The figure is three times higher than the total shipments during the final two years of the previous administration.

MCCI found that at least 58 fuel shipments — including gasoline, diesel, and crude — departed from Mexican ports over just four months, mostly from Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, with three leaving from Tampico, Tamaulipas. The cargoes were tracked through maritime monitoring platforms, showing consistent routes between Mexico and Cuba.

One of the vessels, the Sandino, was included in the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions list in 2019 for transporting Venezuelan oil to Cuba. Despite this, the Sandino departed from Laguna de Pajaritos on August 20 and arrived a week later at Cuba’s Camilo Cienfuegos refinery, the investigation revealed.

The Cuban importer in most cases was Coreydan S.A., a state-owned company based in Havana that shares offices with CUPET, Cuba’s national oil firm.

The scale of Mexico’s fuel aid to Cuba — equivalent to 60 billion pesos — matches the 2026 federal budget for the country’s Ministry of Security and Citizen Protection and far exceeds the budgets for the Attorney General’s Office and education infrastructure funds combined.

MCCI previously warned that the subsidized shipments have worsened Pemex’s financial health. In its first year, Gasolinas Bienestar reported losses and debt of 5.8 billion pesos, reflecting the cost of supplying Cuba with free fuel.

In contrast to what MCCI reports, in the Miami Herald, energy expert Jorge Piñón questioned the accuracy of the reported $3 billion fuel shipments, noting Cuba lacks the storage capacity for such volumes and that customs data is often unreliable. If true, he said, the surge raises key questions amid Cuba’s energy crisis: “Where is that oil? Is Cuba exporting it?”

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com