Thursday, November 27, 2025

 

New deep-learning tool can tell if your salmon is wild or farmed





Oxford University Press USA
Salmon 

image: 

A single salmon scale can reveal a great deal about the fish’s life. As the salmon grows, its scales form concentric rings whose number and spacing reflect its body growth over time.

view more 

Credit: Eva Setsaas, Eva Thorstad, and Bengt Finstad/ Biology Methods and Protocols





A new paper in Biology Methods and Protocols, published by Oxford University Press, finds that we can now distinguish wild from farmed salmon using deep learning, potentially greatly improving strategies for environmental protection.

Norway is home to the largest remaining wild populations of wild salmon and is also one of the largest producers of farmed salmon. Atlantic salmon abundance in Norway has declined by over 50% since the 1980s and is now at historically low levels. Escaped farmed salmon are an important reason for this decline. Norway produces over 1.5 million metric tons of farmed Atlantic salmon annually. Each year, however, approximately 300,000 farmed salmon escape into the wild.

Escaped salmon are a substantial ecological and genetic threat to wild populations since they increase competition for limited resources, such as food and spawning habitats, potentially displacing wild salmon or reducing their reproductive success. Farmed salmon also introduce pathogens and parasites such as sea lice, worsening pressures on wild salmon populations already vulnerable due to climate change and habitat degradation.

Farmed salmon differ genetically from wild populations and interbreeding between escaped farmed salmon and wild salmon leads to genetic changes that make wild salmon less fit to adapt to environmental changes or address threats around them. Genetic analysis shows that approximately two-thirds of wild salmon in Norway carry genetic signatures that indicate interbreeding with farmed salmon.

Scientists monitor escaped farmed salmon using genetic analysis and examination of fish scales. Monitoring differences in fish scale patterns by hand is time consuming and extremely expensive, however. Investigators can distinguish wild from farmed salmon because salmon scales grow by forming concentric rings on their surface. Like with tree rings, the number and spacing of these rings correspond to the growth of the fish. Farmed salmon have scales that represent rapid and steady growth, resulting in regularly spaced scales with limited seasonal markers. In contrast, wild salmon experience pronounced seasonal variation in growth driven by inconsistent temperatures, prey availability, and migration.

To help researchers distinguish between different types of salmon at a larger scale, researchers here trained a new convolutional neural network using nearly 90,000 Atlantic salmon scale images from the Norwegian Veterinary Institute and the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research. They established a standardized processing pipeline and evaluated the model against human scale readers and known-origin fish.

The total dataset consisted of almost 90 thousand images, covering hundreds of rivers across Norway and going back to the early 1930s. Farmed salmon comprised approximately 8.5% of the total images compared to wild salmon.

The investigators found that the data pipeline and model can rapidly process images and provide predictions with associated confidence estimates. The model performed exceptionally well, and was able differentiate farmed from wild salmon across most salmon rivers in Norway from 2009 to 2023 with 95% accuracy.

The paper, “Identifying escaped farmed salmon from fish scales using deep learning,” is available (at midnight on November 26th) at http://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpaf078.

Direct correspondence to: 
Malte Willmes
Norwegian Veterinary Institute
Angelltrøa, 7457 Trondheim, NORWAY
malte.willmes@nina.no

To request a copy of the study, please contact:
Daniel Luzer 
daniel.luzer@oup.com

 

 

Covid lockdown linked to increase in early child development issues



Lockdown and social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic were associated with increased developmental concerns about young children in Scotland, research suggests.




University of Edinburgh





Lockdown and social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic were associated with increased developmental concerns about young children in Scotland, research suggests.

A study of almost 258,000 children in Scotland found that, after accounting for pre-pandemic trends, there was an increase in the proportion of toddlers showing any developmental issues throughout the period of lockdown and social distancing measures between March 2020 and August 2021.

This increase was greater for those who experienced a longer period of social distancing measures with up to a 6.6 per cent increase.

Researchers say the findings provide important new data on how the Covid-19 pandemic public health and social measures from March 2020 were associated with early child development, including speech and language skills, physical movement or emotional growth.

The University of Edinburgh led study measured relationships between lockdown measures and developmental concerns identified by the health visitors of young children.  

The study is the largest known analysis of data assessing Covid-19 measures on child developmental outcomes at a population level in the United Kingdom or Europe.

The researchers assessed data from routine health reviews and examined the proportion of children with any concerns raised by health visitors regarding their development over time.

The study assessed more than 80 per cent of all children in Scotland who were aged 13 to 15 months and 27 to 30 months between January 2019 and August 2023.

Researchers found evidence of increased developmental concerns among children, with up to a 6.6 percentage points increase in the proportion of children with at least one developmental concern across the 72 weeks where lockdown measures were in place from March 2020 to August 2021.

Findings were consistent across different types of developmental concerns including problem solving, speech and behaviour.

The proportion of children with developmental concerns remained higher than pre-pandemic levels even after lockdown and social distancing measures were removed in August 2021.

Notably, developmental concerns at 13 to 15 months continued to rise even after the public health and social measures were lifted, while developmental concerns at the 27 to 30 month reviews stopped increasing but remained above pre-pandemic levels.

The study, in partnership with Public Health Scotland, was conducted as part of the wider Covid -19 Health Impact on long-term Child Development in Scotland (CHILDS) study. Both this study and the wider CHILDS study were funded by the UKRI Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

Researcher Dr Iain Hardie of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, said: “Covid-19 public health and social measures played a vital role in curbing the spread of infections during the pandemic. However, the findings of our study suggest that they also appear to have been associated with increased early childhood development concerns.”

Principal researcher and originator of the CHILDS study Professor Bonnie Auyeung, of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, said: “It has been a privilege to work with our partners in Public Health Scotland on this research. With its integrated healthcare system, Scotland is well positioned to enable this kind of population level study, and it is exciting to see our work being published in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe. We hope this work will help inform the discussion about how best to support children from the Covid-19 era as they develop over the coming years.”

The team added that although the study provides evidence of an association between lockdown measures and developmental concerns in young children, it is important to note that the influence of other factors occurring at the same time cannot be ruled out.

The study is published in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe 2025.Link to study: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(25)00317-5/fulltext  [URL will become active after embargo lifts]. DOI 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101525.

The research team also included scientists from Public Health Scotland, the University of Dundee, the University of Sheffield and the Istituto Italiano di Technologia in Italy.

CHILDS builds upon the previous Covid-19 in Pregnancy in Scotland (COPS) study which examined the effects of the SARS- CoV-2 infections and Covid-19 vaccinations to the point of birth and the newborn period. CHILDS examines subsequent health and developmental outcomes in children during their early childhood period. 

 

Non-invasive closed-loop spinal stimulation enables paraplegic patients to regain stepping control




Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
Non-invasive closed-loop spinal stimulation system 

image: 

Schematic illustration of the noninvasive closed-loop spinal interface. Hand muscle activity is recorded by surface electrodes and converted into trigger pulses for magnetic stimulation applied over the lumbar spinal cord. This allows individuals with paraplegia to control stepping movements of their legs.

view more 

Credit: TMIMS





Spinal cord injury (SCI) rostral to the lumbar locomotor center disrupts communication between the brain and the spinal circuits that control leg movements, leading to paraplegia. A research team led by Dr. Yukio Nishimura of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, in collaboration with Dr. Toshiki Tazoe and colleagues, has now demonstrated a novel noninvasive closed-loop spinal stimulation paradigm that restores stepping control in humans with paraplegia. 

The system records electrical activity from hand muscles and converts these signals into trigger pulses for magnetic stimulation delivered to the lumbar spinal cord. By performing rhythmic hand grips, participants with SCI were able to initiate and terminate bilateral leg stepping, and also control step length and cadence. 

Ten individuals with chronic SCI participated in the study. Repeated application of the closed-loop stimulation led to progressive improvements: 

  • Stimulus-induced stepping became stronger over time, particularly in participants with thoracic SCI. 

  • Volitional stepping without stimulation improved in participants with incomplete SCI, suggesting strengthening of residual descending pathways. 

This noninvasive approach bypasses the lesion site and strengthens preserved spinal and descending circuits, thereby enabling recovery of bilateral stepping control. Because the technique does not require surgery, it represents a safe and promising alternative for patients with contraindications to invasive procedures. 

 

Weather commons as collaborative weather management



A commoning approach for democratic, community-centric weather modification



Ehime University

Conceptual visualization of weather commons 

image: 

This diagram is based on a series of facilitated online workshops in 2023-2024 with 15 experts from diverse disciplinary backgrounds such as engineering, law, commons, geography, art and public governance. It is intended to be a tool for imagining, sharing, and developing the concept of weather commons with diverse stakeholders by visualizing the scope of what a “weather commons” could comprise. All elements are interconnected and interrelated, an assemblage which comes together to form the concept of weather commons.

view more 

Credit: Tsuyoshi Hatori (Ehime University)




As climate change and the resulting extreme weather intensify, interest in weather modification is growing around the world. In Japan, under Goal 8 of the Moonshot Research and Development Program led by the Cabinet Office / JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency), a research and development program for weather control has been launched to mitigate extreme wind and water damage. This project aims to use advanced technologies such as artificial rainfall, offshore wind turbines, and offshore curtains to intervene in weather conditions and suppress the frequency and intensity of heavy rain and typhoons. While such technologies could help reduce damage from increasingly severe heavy rains and typhoons, they also carry the potential to fundamentally alter the relationship between humans and weather that humanity has built over time.

An article recently published in the journal npj Climate Action proposes a new concept called “Weather Commons” as a democratic, bottom-up approach centered on local communities, setting it apart from the top-down, technocratic approach to weather control. Here, the term “Commons” emphasizes the idea that weather “belongs to everyone”, drawing upon research on common resources management and commoning. The authors define “Weather Commons” as “social-ecological systems that enable collective stewardship of weather-related resources and processes, by promoting cooperation and trust between actors across scales.” The concept of Weather Commons is expected to help shed light on the rich relationship between humans and weather, critically examine the technocratic approach to weather control and its dominant position, and serve as a powerful corrective to excessive reliance on technological fixes.

The authors emphasize the need to increase society's ability to embrace the weather in parallel with technological development of weather control. The framework of the Weather Commons seeks to provide both a starting point and platform for a broad civic dialogue to decide if, when, and how we should engage in weather control.