Saturday, January 10, 2026

 

Scientists trace facial gestures back to their source. before a smile appears, the brain has already decided



New study in Science reveals a neural hierarchy that converts intention into expression, before a face even moves




The Hebrew University of Jerusalem





Every time we smile, grimace, or flash a quick look of surprise, it feels effortless, but the brain is quietly coordinating an intricate performance. This study shows that facial gestures aren’t controlled by two separate “systems” (one for deliberate expressions and one for emotional ones), as scientists long assumed. Instead, multiple face-control regions in the brain work together, using different kinds of signals: some are fast and shifting, like real-time choreography, while others are steadier, like a held intention. Remarkably, these brain patterns appear before the face even moves, meaning the brain starts preparing a gesture in advance, shaping it not just as a movement, but as a socially meaningful message. That matters because facial expressions are one of our most powerful tools for communication and understanding how the brain builds them helps explain what can go wrong after brain injury or in conditions that affect social signaling, This may eventually guide new ways to restore or interpret facial communication when it’s lost.

 

When someone smiles politely, flashes a grin of recognition, or tightens their lips in disapproval, the movement is tiny, but the message can be enormous. Facial gestures are among the most powerful forms of communication in primate societies, delivering emotion, intention, and social meaning in fractions of a second.

Now, a new study published in Science uncovers how the brain prepares and produces these gestures through a temporally organized hierarchy of neural “codes,” including signals that appear well before movement begins.

The research was led by Prof. Winrich A. Freiwald of The Rockefeller University in New York and Prof. Yifat Prut of ELSC at Hebrew University working with Dr. Geena Ianni and Dr. Yuriria Vázquez from The Rockefeller University.

For decades, neuroscience has leaned on a tidy division: lateral cortical areas in the frontal lobe controls deliberate, voluntary facial movements, while the medial areas governs emotional expressions. This view was shaped in part by clinical evidence from individuals with focal brain lesions.

But by directly measuring activity from individual neurons across both cortical regions, the researchers found something striking: both regions encode both voluntary and emotional gestures and they do so in ways that are distinguishable well before any visible facial movement occurs.

In other words, facial communication appears to be orchestrated not by two separate systems, but by a continuous neural hierarchy, where different regions contribute information at different time scales, some fast-changing and dynamic, others stable and sustained.

Dynamic vs. Stable: Two Neural Languages Working Together

The team discovered that the brain uses area-specific timing patterns that form a continuum:

  • Dynamic neural activity reflects the rapid unfolding of facial motion, like the shifting muscle choreography involved in an expression.
  • Stable neural activity functions more like a sustained “intent” or “context” signal, persisting in time to support socially appropriate output.

Together, these activity patterns allow the brain to generate coherent facial gestures that match the context: deliberate or spontaneous, socially calibrated, and communication-ready.

Why This Matters

Facial gestures are not just physical movements. They are social actions, and the brain treats them as such.

This discovery offers a new framework for understanding:

  • How facial gestures are coordinated in real time
  • How communication-related motor control is structured in the brain
  • What may go wrong in disorders where facial signalling is disrupted—whether through neurological injury or conditions affecting social communication

And it reframes facial expression as something more sophisticated than a reflex or a simple decision: it is the product of a coordinated neural hierarchy that bridges emotion, intention, and action.

By showing that multiple brain regions work in parallel, each contributing different timing-based codes, the study opens new pathways for exploring how the brain produces socially meaningful behavior.

“Facial gestures may look effortless,” the researchers note, “but the neural machinery behind them is remarkably structured and begins preparing for communication well before movement even starts.”

How the brain creates facial expressions


New work demonstrates how neural circuits in the brain and muscles of the face work together to respond physically to social cues



Rockefeller University

Winrich Freiwald 

image: 

Winrich Freiwald

view more 

Credit: Matthew Septimus/The Rockefeller University





When a baby smiles at you, it’s almost impossible not to smile back. This spontaneous reaction to a facial expression is part of the back-and-forth that allows us to understand each other’s emotions and mental states.

Faces are so important to social communication that we’ve evolved specialized brain cells just to recognize them, as Rockefeller University’s Winrich Freiwald has discovered. It’s just one of a suite of groundbreaking findings the scientist has made in the past decade that have greatly advanced the neuroscience of face perception.

Now he and his team in the Laboratory of Neural Systems have turned their attention to the counterpart of face perception: facial expression. How neural circuits in the brain and muscles of the face work together to, for example, form a smile has remained largely unknown—until now. As they published in Science, Freiwald’s team has discovered a facial motor network and the neural mechanisms that keep it operating.

In this first systematic study of the neural mechanisms of facial movement control, they found that both lower-level and higher-level brain regions are involved in encoding different types of facial gestures—contrary to long-held assumptions. It had long been thought that these activities were segregated, with emotional expressions (such as returning a smile) originating in the medial frontal lobe and voluntary actions (such as eating or speaking) in the lateral frontal lobe.

“We had a good understanding of how facial gestures are received, but now we have a much better understanding of how they're generated,” says Freiwald, whose research is supported by the Price Family Center for the Social Brain at Rockefeller.

“We found that all regions participated in all types of facial gestures but operate on their own distinct timescales, suggesting that each region is uniquely suited to the ‘job’ it performs,” says co-lead author Geena Ianni, a former member of Freiwald’s lab and a neurology resident at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

Where facial expressions come from

Our need to communicate through facial expressions runs deep—all the way down to the brain stem, in fact. It’s there that the so-called facial nucleus is located, which houses motoneurons that control facial muscles. They also project into multiple cortical regions, including different areas of the frontal cortex, which contributes to both motor function and complex thinking. 

Neuroanatomical work has demonstrated that there are multiple regions in the cortex that directly access the muscles of facial expression—a unique feature of primates—but how each one specifically contributes has remained largely unknown. Studies of people with brain lesions suggest different regions may code for different facial movements. When people have damage to the lateral frontal cortex, for example, they lose the ability to make voluntary movements, such as speaking or eating, while lesions in the medial frontal cortex lead to the inability to spontaneously express an emotion, such as returning a smile.

“They don’t lose the ability to move their muscles, just the ability to do it in a particular context,” Freiwald says.

“We wondered, could these regions make unique contributions to facial expressions? It turns out that no one had really investigated this,” Ianni says.

Adopting an innovative approach designed by the Freiwald lab, they used an fMRI scanner to visualize the brain activity of macaque monkeys while they produced facial expressions. In doing so, they located three cortical areas that directly access facial musculature: the cingulate motor cortex (medially located), and the primary and premotor cortices (laterally located), as well as the somatosensory cortices.

Mapping the network

Using these methods, they were able map out a facial motor network composed of neural activity from the different regions of the frontal lobe—the lateral primary motor cortex, ventral premotor cortex, and medial cingulate motor cortex—and the primary somatosensory cortex, in the parietal lobe.

Using this targeted map, the researchers were able to then record neural activity in each cortical region while the monkeys produced facial expressions. The researchers studied three types of facial movements: threatening, lipsmacking, and chewing. A threatening look from a macaque involves staring straight ahead with an open jaw and bared teeth, while lipsmacking involves rapidly puckering the lips while flattening of the ears against the skull. These are both socially meaningful, contextually specific facial gestures that macaques use to navigate social interactions. Chewing is neither social nor emotional, but voluntary.

The researchers used a variety of dynamic stimuli to elicit these expressions in the lab, including direct interaction with other macaques, videos of other macaques, and artificial digital avatars controlled by the researchers themselves.

They were able to link neural activity from these regions to the coordinated movement of specific regions of the face: eyes and eyebrows; the upper and lower mouth; and the lower face and ears.

The researchers found that both higher and lower cortical regions were involved in producing both emotional and voluntary facial expressions. However, not all of that activity was the same: The neurons in each region operated at a distinct tempo when producing facial gestures.

“Lateral regions like the primary motor cortex housed fast neural dynamics that changed on the order of milliseconds, while medial regions like the cingulate cortex housed slow, stable neural dynamics that lasted for much longer,” says Ianni.

In related work based on the same data, the team recently documented in PNAS that the different cortical regions governing facial movement work together as a single interconnected sensorimotor network, adjusting their coordination based on the movement being produced.

“This suggests facial motor control is dynamic and flexible rather than routed through fixed, independent pathways,” says Yuriria Vázquez, co-lead author and a former postdoc in Freiwald’s lab.

“This is contrary to the standard view that they work in parallel and separate action,” Freiwald adds. “That really underscores the connectivity of the facial motor network.”

Better brain-machine interfaces

Now that Freiwald’s lab has made significant insights into both facial perception and expression in separate experiments, in the future he’d like to study these complementary elements of social communication simultaneously.

“We think that will help us better understand emotions,” he says. “There's a big debate in this field about how motor signals relate to emotions internally, but we think that if you have perception on one side and a motor response on the other, emotions somehow happen in between. We would like to find the areas controlling emotional states—we have ideas about where they are—and then understand how they work together with motor areas to generate different kinds of behaviors.”

Vázquez sees two possible future avenues of research that could build on their findings. The first involves understanding how dynamic social cues (faces, eye gaze), internal states, and reward influence the facial motor system. These insights would be crucial for explaining how decisions about facial expression production are made. The second relates to using this integrated network for clinical applications.

The findings may also help improve brain-machine interfaces. “As with our approach, those devices also involve implanting electrodes to decode brain signals, and then they translate that information into action, such as moving a limb or a robotic arm,” Freiwald says. “Communication has proven far more difficult to decode. And because of the importance of facial expression to communication, it will be very useful to have devices that can decode and translate these kinds of facial signals.”

Adds Ianni, “I hope our work moves the field, even the tiniest bit, towards more naturalistic and rich artificial communication designs that will improve lives of patients after brain injury.”

 

Manganese gets its moment as a potential fuel cell catalyst



Yale University





According to a new study by researchers at Yale and the University of Missouri, chemical catalysts containing manganese — an abundant, inexpensive metallic element — proved highly effective in converting carbon dioxide into formate, a compound viewed as a potential key contributor of hydrogen for the next generation of fuel cells.

The new study appears in the journal Chem. The lead authors are Yale postdoctoral researcher Justin Wedal and Missouri graduate research assistant Kyler Virtue; the senior authors are professors Nilay Hazari of Yale and Wesley Bernskoetter of Missouri.

Like a battery, a hydrogen fuel cell converts chemical energy from hydrogen into electricity. One challenge for widespread use of such technology is developing cost-efficient ways to produce and store hydrogen.

“Carbon dioxide utilization is a priority right now, as we look for renewable chemical feedstocks to replace feedstocks derived from fossil fuel,” said Hazari, the John Randolph Huffman Professor of Chemistry, and chair of chemistry, in Yale’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS).

Formic acid, the protonated form of formate, is a commodity chemical produced at an industrial scale for use as a preservative, antibacterial agent, and tanning agent. It is also viewed by many researchers as a likely source of hydrogen for fuel cells — if it can be produced sustainably and effectively.

Currently, industrial formate production involves the use of fossil fuels, and is thus not considered a sustainable option in the long-term. A more planet-friendly approach, researchers say, is to create formate from atmospheric carbon dioxide, essentially removing greenhouse gas and converting it into a useful product.

But to do this, a catalyst is required. And therein lies the challenge for researchers.

Many of the effective potential catalysts in development are based on precious metals, which are expensive, less abundant, and have high toxicity. On the other hand, metal catalysts that are more abundant, more sustainable, and less expensive have tended to be less effective since they decompose rapidly, which limits their ability to convert carbon dioxide into formate.

Hazari’s team offers a new approach.

The researchers were able to extend the catalytic lifetime of manganese-based catalysts to such a degree that their effectiveness outpaced most of the precious metal catalysts. The key innovation, they said, was to stabilize the catalysts by adding another donor atom into the ligand design (ligands are atoms or molecules that bond with a metal atom and influence reactivity).

“I’m excited to see the ligand design pay off in such a meaningful way,” said Wedal.

The researchers also said their approach may be broadly applied to other catalytic transformations, beyond the conversion of carbon dioxide to formate.

Yale’s Brandon Mercado and Nicole Piekut are co-authors of the study. Funding for the research came from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science.

 

Research shows how immune system reacts to pig kidney transplants in living patients



Results indicate that the innate immune response remains activated even with immunosuppressant use, paving the way for new therapies to prevent organ rejection.



Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Research shows how immune system reacts to pig kidney transplants in living patients 

image: 

Brazilian nephrologist Leonardo Riella, co-author of the article published in Nature Medicine, led the first pig-to-human kidney transplant in March 2024 at Massachusetts General Hospital

view more 

Credit: Massachusetts General Hospital





Pioneering research led by Brazilians describes the immune system’s reactions in detail in the first living patient to receive a genetically modified pig kidney transplant. This paves the way for the search for therapies that can prevent organ rejection.

The study demonstrates the feasibility of this type of graft but indicates that controlling initial rejection alone is insufficient. This is because even with immunosuppressants, continuous activation of innate immunity – the body’s first line of defense, especially macrophages, which react to any threat – can compromise long-term survival.

Through transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and spatial analyses, the scientists have determined that new strategies are necessary to achieve long-term survival and favorable clinical outcomes. They recommend combining therapies that target innate immunity with advanced genetic engineering in donor pigs. They also suggest preventing early T lymphocyte-mediated rejection and implementing more sensitive monitoring approaches.

Xenotransplantation involves transplanting organs, tissues, or cells from one animal species – mainly genetically modified pigs – to humans. It is considered a promising solution to organ shortages, but rejection has been a major challenge.

In March 2024, the first living patient to receive a pig kidney was a 62-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease who underwent surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital, which is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in Boston. Brazilian nephrologist Leonardo Riella, one of the article’s corresponding authors, led the team. The article was published on January 8 in the scientific journal Nature Medicine. The patient died two months later; the probable cause was previous chronic myocardial fibrosis.

According to data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health, kidney transplants are in the highest demand in Brazil. In 2025, about 6,670 surgeries of this type were performed in the country.

Additionally, it is estimated that between 10 and 12 million Brazilians have some form of kidney disease, a figure that could rise as the population ages and the number of people with diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity increases. In more severe cases, dialysis may be a temporary treatment option. Dialysis is an artificial process that removes waste and excess fluids from the body when the kidneys are not functioning properly.

“The main finding of the study was the detailed, unprecedented, high-resolution characterization of the human immune response following the transplantation of a genetically modified pig kidney into a living patient. The results show that, for xenotransplantation to become a safe and lasting clinical option, controlling only adaptive immunity, as we traditionally do in transplants between humans, is insufficient. Specific strategies must also be developed to modulate the innate immune response and ensure the prolonged survival of xenogeneic grafts in humans,” said Thiago Borges, a professor and researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, as well as the corresponding author of the article, in an interview with Agência FAPESP.

Multiple perspectives

To comprehensively evaluate the response triggered by renal xenotransplantation, the researchers characterized the recipient’s immune profile by cross-referencing information obtained from clinical analyses with information from proteomics and metabolomics, which includes sugars, lipids, amino acids, and other metabolites.

They observed that, in the first week after surgery, the patient’s body recognized the transplanted organ as “foreign” and activated cellular rejection, a specific type of defense conducted mainly by T lymphocytes. This process can damage the transplanted organ and was identified and controlled with immunosuppressive drugs.

The study showed that although no more severe rejection (mediated by antibodies) occurred, the immune system remained partially active, especially in monocytes and macrophages. This reveals a central and hitherto underestimated role of innate immunity in xenotransplant rejection.

This rejection was not detected through blood tests. However, tests measuring DNA fragments from the transplanted organ in the bloodstream indicated kidney damage. Based on these results, the group suggests that levels of porcine donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) could serve as a potential biomarker for this issue. In the case analyzed, the pig kidney had 69 genetic modifications to increase immune compatibility.

“We demonstrated that DNA fragments from the pig kidney circulating in the patient’s blood can be used as a sensitive and noninvasive marker of rejection. This opens up the possibility of monitoring the graft in real time, which potentially reduces the need for biopsies,” Borges explains.

Persistent activation of innate immunity was also observed, with signs of ongoing inflammation. Despite advances in treatment, the findings suggest that current treatments are still unable to fully control immune responses.

“This study was important because it provided a broad view of all the molecular and cellular changes that occurred during the transplant. This can help guide and improve the efficiency of immunosuppression,” says Helder Nakaya, senior researcher at the Albert Einstein Jewish-Brazilian Hospital and one of the authors of the article.

Nakaya is a professor at the University of São Paulo’s School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF-USP) and receives support from FAPESP for the project “Integrative Biology Applied to Human Health.” This project aims to develop innovative approaches to analyze epidemiological databases, map disease transmission hotspots, integrate transcriptome data with clinical and immunological information, and use machine learning to interpret and analyze microscopic images.

He is also the principal investigator at the Center for Research on Inflammatory Diseases (CRID), a FAPESP Research, Innovation, and Dissemination Center (RIDC).

“Due to our work developing various analytical tools, including single-cell analysis, we were invited by Harvard researchers to work on the integrated multiomic analysis of these thousands of molecules,” adds Nakaya, who has advocated for creating an advanced school specializing in this type of analysis.

In November 2025, a different group of scientists affiliated with U.S. institutions published research evaluating the rejection of a pig kidney transplanted into a brain-dead person (read the article at www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09847-6).

About São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration. You can learn more about FAPESP at www.fapesp.br/en and visit FAPESP news agency at www.agencia.fapesp.br/en to keep updated with the latest scientific breakthroughs FAPESP helps achieve through its many programs, awards and research centers. You may also subscribe to FAPESP news agency at http://agencia.fapesp.br/subscribe.