Sunday, August 09, 2026

 

Antenna-like cell appendage linked to turtles’ sex-deciding warmth-sensing




Iowa State University
Turtle hatchlings 

image: 

A painted turtle hatchling at the Iowa State University Horticulture Research Station is on the left. The grayish hatchling on the right is a spiny softshell turtle in Nicole Valenzuela's laboratory.

view more 

Credit: Colin Schuller and Nicole Valenzuela/Iowa State University






AMES, Iowa — When most baby turtles hatch, their sex depends on the temperature of the sand or soil where their mother laid her eggs. Warm incubation brings females, while cool nests produce males.

Based on a new study led by an Iowa State University evolutionary biologist, a once-ignored cell component — primary cilia, an antenna-like protrusion from most types of animal cells — may help turtle embryos detect that sex-deciding warmth. It’s the first time that turtle sex determination has been linked to primary cilia, but the cellular sensor is a growing focus of human health research, as they are now recognized as important for development and disease. That heightens the interest from Nicole Valenzuela’s research team.

“We have concluded we need to open a whole new research avenue to characterize primary cilia in turtles and see how they're composed, what they are doing, and how they are changing and responding to temperature and other cell signals. It's basic science that’s also biomedical science,” said Valenzuela, professor of ecology, evolution and organismal biology at Iowa State.

A surprising analysis

Valenzuela studies how evolution and environmental factors influence complex traits such as sex determination, with a particular focus on turtles. Over more than 200 million years, an especially long lineage for a four-limb vertebrate, some species of turtles have developed sex-specific chromosomes that dictate whether they become male or female, but most are still temperature-dependent.

Looking to better understand the basis of that change, Valenzuela’s team identified what genes are involved in making the reproductive organs of two species that determine sex in different ways: painted turtles that have retained the ancestral temperature-driven method and spiny softshell turtles, which have sex chromosomes.

Researchers then integrated data on gene expression, protein-protein interactions and protein-DNA interactions to model molecular regulatory networks for the sex-development genes — essentially, a snapshot of their cellular control circuitry as gonads are emerging. Comparing the regulatory networks showed painted and spiny softshell turtles share 89 transcription factor hubs, special proteins that turn clusters of genes on and off.  

Of the 89 shared hubs, 50 were unchanged between species, perhaps representing the underlying core of building turtle gonads, Valenzuela said. But looking at the hubs that changed the most and cross-referencing them against databases that track known gene functions, researchers kept seeing a term they didn’t anticipate or know well: primary cilia.

“We said, ‘What’s going on here,’” Valenzuela said.

A promising direction

Other scientists in her field had a similar reaction. When Valenzuela presented the study at the International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination earlier this year, she asked a roomful of colleagues who had heard of primary cilia. Only a couple of hands went up.

Though unexpected, the relationship between primary cilia and sex differentiation in turtles appears robust. Multiple approaches to analyzing their regulatory network models linked transcription factor hubs to primary cilia, with some gene targets shifting from the antenna’s function in painted turtles to its structure and formation in spiny softshells. And a forthcoming study from Valenzuela’s lab that looked at turtle embryo histones — proteins that give DNA a spool to wind around — uncovered some related associations, she said.

“All of a sudden, we’re finding all these different lines of evidence pointing in the same direction,” she said.

Once the researchers began delving into recent research into primary cilia, the potential connection began to make more sense. Primary cilia detect environmental cues outside of cells, including temperature changes, and manage major signaling pathways, some of which have been connected to mammalian sexual development. 

While further research is needed to validate the researchers’ hypothesis that the cellular antenna plays a direct role in turtle sex determination, anything learned about primary cilia could inform ongoing research into their role in human well-being, Valenzuela said.  Dysfunctional cilia have been implicated in an expanding list of human disorders that includes cancer as well as brain and lung diseases.

And if primary cilia have a broad role sensing temperature in turtles, it could shed more light on the molecular mechanics of some turtles’ remarkable ability to withstand extreme cold, which would be a valuable trait to harness for human health care as well, Valenzuela said.

“Turtles happen to be very interesting from a thermal sensory perspective,” she said.  

 

Hidden hormone–habitat relationship revealed in reef fish



Multi-omics study shows biology behind the dramatic differences in fish raised in different habitats



Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University

Convict surgeonfish shoal video 

video: 

Footage taken in the field of a shoal of convict surgeonfish swimming around a reef.

view more 

Credit: Cécile Berthe





In the animal kingdom, only those who adapt to their environment will survive. This adaptation comes in a wide range of forms, from invisible internal shifts in gene expression to dramatic anatomical changes, such as tadpoles growing legs and transitioning to life on land as frogs. Environmental pressures are known as a driving force behind many of the major animal developmental transitions. Yet the mechanisms behind this physical and environmental relationship remain somewhat of a mystery.

Published in Science Advances, a new multi-year study led by researchers in the International Research Laboratory 2028 (IRL EARLY), a joint laboratory between the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) and CNRS, together with Dr. David Lecchini, an ecologist at CRIOBE in Moorea, sheds light on the mechanistic link between environmental variation and developmental adaptability. Using a common reef fish as a model, the researchers explored how environmental differences impacted thyroid hormone signaling, a process essential for development regulation. Through a combination of transcriptomics, metabolomics and other physiological analytical approaches, they revealed how the development of these fish changed across different ecosystems.

“It’s surprising to see just how responsive development can be to the immediate environment, not just on evolutionary timescales but within an individual’s lifetime,” says first author Dr. Marcela Herrera of the Marine-Eco-Evo-Devo Unit at OIST which led this study. “We found that environment and development are far more tightly coupled than we assume, which raises the question of how much flexibility this gives animals when their environments change. This is especially important for animals threatened by climate change or habitat degradation.”

One island, many ecosystems

Along the beautiful coastline of Moorea Island, located to the northwest of Tahiti in French Polynesia, an expanse of just a few kilometers brings wildly different local ecosystems. 

Where rivers meet the sea, dynamic mangrove forests fluctuate in water level and salinity. As water level drops, water temperature often rises. This warm, murky water contains an abundance of sediment and decaying twigs and leaves, resulting in low dissolved oxygen levels. Regardless of challenging conditions, some fish still choose to make these mangroves home. The tangled roots of mangrove trees provide young juveniles with valuable shelter from predators.

Further up the coast, rocky reefs and sandy beaches offer more stable temperature and oxygen conditions. Cracks and crevices in beach rocks give hiding spots for smaller creatures, while sandy beaches suit strong swimmers who can travel further to forage for food.

Despite the starkly differing conditions, some creatures, like the convict surgeonfish (Acanthurus triostegus), are found across beaches and mangroves alike. Originally starting off life in the open ocean, convict surgeonfish larvae migrate to these coastal habitats where they undergo dramatic physical changes to become juvenile fish. 

“This transition from open ocean to coastal nurseries is a dramatic and stressful shift: during the first day entering the reef, 90% of the juveniles are eaten by predators. Those who survive typically lose 20% of their weight during their first week. It is a real challenge for them," highlights head of the Marine-Eco-Evo-Devo Unit, Professor Vincent Laudet who led this research. 

Investigating development: a systems-level approach

To understand the influence of environment, the researchers first profiled fish biology across the transition. Previous observations had already hinted that habitat shapes this transition: fish settling in different environments are known to grow at different rates and develop differently, with mangrove fish, for instance, typically growing more slowly and developing darker pigmentation than fish from other habitats. The team wanted to know whether these visible differences were matched by differences happening at the level of gene expression and hormone signaling.

Studying both wild and lab-reared fish, they took a range of measurements across the first eight days of metamorphosis.

At different timepoints, they found different genes expressed, including genes responsible for thyroid hormone synthesis and genes controlled by thyroid hormones, such as those involved in pigmentation changes. They also noted shifts in gene expression relating to energy metabolism, marking a switch from aerobic to anaerobic energy production.

“You could think of this as a change from endurance cardio to high-intensity intervals. As these fish move from the open ocean to coastal habitats, they shift from a metabolism built for sustained, long-distance swimming to one that can fuel the rapid rebuilding of their body for life on the reef,” explains Herrera.

They repeated similar measurements with fish raised in temporary enclosures within a range of mangrove, beach rock and sandy beach environments around the coast of the island. Habitat had a distinct impact on development.

Thyroid hormone levels varied significantly between habitats, as did expression of genes involved in thyroid hormone pathways. Metabolic profiles varied too, with sandy beach fish displaying patterns consistent with higher energy usage compared to the other environments.

“In sandy beaches, resources are generally less abundant, so fish may have to exert more energy to find food or swim away from predators. Beach rock and mangrove ecosystems offer more protection and resources,” reasons Herrera.

Thyroid hormones are known to control gene expression, particularly for genes involved in key developmental processes and in energy metabolism. Together, the analyses showed that in different ecological contexts, thyroid hormone signaling varied dramatically, producing habitat-specific developmental outcomes.

“Whilst biologists have long accepted that genes and environment both shape development, this study helps to answer a long running question around how the two actually communicate,” says Laudet. “Thyroid hormones essentially act as a biological interface between the environment and development. They integrate environmental information to enable developing organisms to adjust their physiology and metabolism to local conditions.”

 

Every mosquito has a type — and you may not be it




Florida International University
Mosquito microscope 

image: 

A mosquito is examined under a microscope in the lab of FIU professor Matthew DeGennaro. (Credit: Christopher Necuze/Florida International University)

view more 

Credit: Christopher Necuze/Florida International University





There is no such thing as a universal mosquito magnet.  

In a new study published in iScience, Florida International University (FIU) researchers pitted 119 human volunteers against three of the world's most dangerous mosquito species and found that not one person was attractive to all three. Every species had its own type. Attraction was largely driven by chemistry — an individual’s body chemistry.

This single finding could reshape how the world fights mosquito-borne disease. Because each species decodes human scent differently, the results could help scientists develop next-generation, species-specific repellents.  

"Isolating the components of human odor that attract or repel mosquitoes could lead to novel strategies to combat vector-borne diseases," said Matthew DeGennaro, a neurogeneticist who leads the research team and directs the Biomolecular Sciences Institute at FIU, Miami’s state university. 

The three species studied — Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito) and Culex quinquefasciatus (southern house mosquito) — together spread yellow fever, dengue, Zika, West Nile and other diseases. The study, led by Ph.D. student Kaylee Marrero, is the first to directly compare how multiple mosquito species respond to the same people. 

“We didn’t expect the species to prefer different people when we started the study,” Marrero said. “Each species having a distinct microbial signature that they use as a cue was so surprising to me.” 

Each species had a distinct set of turn-ons and turn-offs: 

  • Aedes aegypti preferred people wearing no added scent whose skin lacked certain volatile compounds. These daytime feeders showed a slight preference for men over women. 

  • Aedes albopictus (Asian tiger) was drawn to elevated ketones and plant-like volatile compounds naturally secreted by skin. Like Aedes aegypti, it feeds during the day. 

  • Culex quinquefasciatus (southern house) fed after dark and keyed in on the skin microbiome — the microscopic ecosystem of bacteria, fungi and microbes naturally living on people’s skin. Some bacterial families were a green light to feed; others drove the mosquitoes away. 

Human scent is a complex space of more than 1,000 volatile organic compounds, many still uncharacterized. Rather than agreeing on who was most attractive, each species consistently favored a different subset of people — evidence that the species have evolved distinct ways of sensing humans. Alongside the preference tests, the team collected odor and microbiome samples to identify which compounds and bacteria were present, and at what levels. 

"This connected so well with the differences in skin bacteria and odors," DeGennaro said. "It is clear to me now that our skin microbiomes define our human odor signature. Each species found its own way to decode that signature." 

By mapping these species-specific chemical cues, the FIU team is laying the groundwork for repellents and public health strategies tailored to the mosquito that matters most in a given region.

Photos and videos for media use are available via Dropbox

 

First-ever Southeast Farm and Forest Land Summit set for October 12 in Middle Tennessee



Farmers, ag leaders and faculty to discuss solutions to challenges of rapid land use changes




University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

Scott Farmer and son 

image: 

Scott Farmer and his family grow cotton, corn and soybeans in Haywood County. His son already enjoys helping on the farm, and land availability is essential for ensuring the operation can someday be passed on to this next generation.

view more 

Credit: Photo by T. Cronin, courtesy UTIA.





Rapid land use changes across the Southeast United States are creating challenges for young and beginning farmers, family farm operations and the economies of rural communities.

 

To address this challenge, the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture (UTIA) and the Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation will host the inaugural Southeast Farm and Forest Land Summit on Monday, October 12, 2026, at the Tennessee Farm Bureau headquarters in Columbia, Tennessee.

 

The summit will bring together farmers, agricultural industry leaders, state agencies and university faculty in the Southeast to move beyond awareness and toward action on ways to address the rapid loss of farm and forest land.

 

Participants at the summit will hear from industry leaders from across the region as they discuss ways to improve farm profitability, land access for young and beginning farmers and policy options for preserving working farmland. Rapid land use changes are not unique to the Southeast, and organizers hope this summit will serve as a model for how universities, industry partners and government agencies can work together to develop actionable solutions.

 

“I’m excited about this opportunity to convene leaders from across the Southeast to address such a critical issue,” said Keith Carver, UTIA senior vice chancellor and senior vice president.

 

“Farm and forest land loss is top of mind for Tennessee’s agricultural producers and rural communities. This summit will serve as a forum to share science-based research, exchange perspectives and advance practical solutions,” Carver said.

 

Eric Mayberry, president of the Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation, said, “Farmers across the Southeast are dealing with profitability challenges and rapid land use change. We are proud to partner with UTIA to have conversations with agriculture and forestry leaders from the region to focus on these challenges.”

 

The day-long summit will include an economic outlook for the Southeast and farmland investment presentations along with panel discussions on the state of the agricultural economy, land use change trends, public policy options, and succession planning for farm and forest landowners.

 

Learn more about the summit by contacting Alison Davis at 865-974-7273 or by email to adavi257@utk.edu. The cost to attend is $20. Register at tiny.utk.edu/2026-land-summit.

 

The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture is comprised of the Herbert College of Agriculture, UT College of Veterinary Medicine, UT AgResearch and UT Extension. Through its land-grant mission of teaching, research and outreach, the Institute touches lives and provides Real. Life. Solutions. to Tennesseans and beyond. utia.tennessee.edu

 

New tools reopen an old path to less addictive opioids



Researchers at Duke University School of Medicine are investigating how to keep opioids' pain-relieving benefits while reducing their addictive potential


Duke University






Researchers at Duke University School of Medicine are investigating how to keep opioids' pain-relieving benefits while reducing their addictive potential. In a study published in Nature, they report a step toward that goal.

The team found that a particular small group of brain cells appear to play an important role in opioid reward learning, a process that can lay the foundation for addiction. The study challenges conclusions from earlier studies.

Opioids can relieve pain by binding to receptors in the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system, turning down the volume on pain signals before they reach the brain. But opioids also act in the brain itself, altering the release of dopamine and other chemicals that change how a person interprets pain. 

"You may still feel the pain, but you aren't bothered by it," said Mike Tadross, MD, PhD, assistant professor of neurosurgery and senior author of the study. “It’s like if you happen to twist your ankle while running away from a bear; you feel the pain, but you just don't care. That kind of analgesia is unique to opioids.”  

But those effects come with risk. The brain can learn to associate the drug with desirable outcomes — a process called reward learning. Those lessons can lead to seeking out the drug, which can contribute to addiction. 

In mice, Tadross and colleagues, including postdoctoral associate Aryana Yousefzadeh, PhD, found that controlling morphine’s effects in a group of neurons that release a chemical called acetylcholine prevented the drug-related associations that underlie reward learning. But blocking morphine in these neurons didn’t interfere with its pain-relieving effects or its ability to elevate dopamine in the brain.

"What’s unique about our study is that it shows that dopamine elevation can be separated from learned drug preference," Tadross said. "Dopamine isn’t enough by itself; opioid reward learning also appears to require a drop in acetylcholine, controlled by a small cholinergic hub.” 

"That’s really exciting because it suggests that you might retain many of the benefits of opioids — even allowing them to do what opioids are so good at doing: to change how pain is perceived in the brain — while potentially making them less addictive.” 

The language of neurotransmitters

Neuroscientists often classify neurons by the neurotransmitters they release. "It's like the language they speak," Tadross said. 

Most people are familiar with dopamine, often called the brain's "reward" chemical. Opioids trigger dopamine surges in a brain region called the nucleus accumbens, which plays an important role in motivation, emotion, and learning. Because dopamine rises when opioids are taken, scientists have long viewed it as a major driver of opioid reward learning. 

But not all neurons in the nucleus accumbens speak the same chemical “language.” Some communicate using acetylcholine, and for years their role in addiction has been uncertain. 

Earlier studies examining these cholinergic neurons suggested they were not essential for opioid reward learning. Researchers reached that conclusion using genetic techniques that permanently removed opioid receptors from the cells at birth, leading many scientists to focus on other parts of the brain. 

Tadross suspected the picture might look different if the receptors could be blocked temporarily instead. Using a molecular targeting tool called DART, developed in his lab, the team created a version of the opioid reversal drug naloxone that acted only on cholinergic neurons in the nucleus accumbens while leaving opioid signaling elsewhere intact.

The result? The mice no longer developed a preference for a chamber where they received morphine, a widely used measure of reward learning. But they still got pain relief.

The surprising finding suggests that the opioid-induced drop in acetylcholine release from this small group of neurons may play a critical role in helping the brain form rewarding associations with opioids.

Tadross said those earlier studies likely missed the effect because the brain compensated for the genetic changes over time.

"We essentially repeated the same experiment, but with better tools,” he said.

The nucleus accumbens is an evolutionarily ancient brain region shared by mice and people. Although the study was conducted in mice, that similarity raises the possibility that the same mechanism could influence opioid effects in humans. More research is needed to determine whether it does — and whether the mechanism can be targeted safely with a medication. 

Other Duke authors: Haidun Yan, Seung-Hwa Kwak, Yunju Oh, Pyeonghwa Jeong, Vladimir Pogorelov, J. Russell Ravenel, Shaun S.X. Lim, James M. Roach, Brenda C. Shields, Ramona M. Rodriguiz, William C. Wetsel, and Jiyong Hong. 

Funding: The National Institutes of Health.