Saturday, January 10, 2026

Opinion

Trump's lies are killing us: The deadly consequences of big and little lies everywhere

(RNS) — If we trace the chain of events that caused ICE agents to be deployed to Minneapolis in the first place, they are anchored in Trump’s lies.


People gather for a vigil after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a woman earlier in the day, Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Bruce Kluckhohn)

Robert P. Jones
January 9, 2026
RNS

(RNS) — During the opening days of his first term, Trump achieved something remarkable: according to The New York Times, “He said something untrue, in public, every day for the first 40 days of his presidency.” His spokesperson, Kellyanne Conway, coined the Orwellian term “alternative facts” to try to justify Trump’s insistence, despite clear evidence to the contrary, that the crowd size at his inauguration was larger than Obama’s. By the time he was finally forced from office four years later, The Washington Post had logged 30,573 times that Trump had uttered false or misleading claims.

Trump’s lies, both big and small, have been corrosive to the foundations of civil society and democracy, which depend on a shared sense of reality. But the events of the first days of 2026 also show they are deadly. They are literally killing us.

Given Trump’s inclination to dishonesty, his authoritarian leanings and his inability to admit failure, it’s no surprise he would respond to electoral defeat with what became known as The Big Lie: his false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him. What is remarkable is how willing his followers, including his stalwart white Christian supporters, were to embrace this lie.

On Jan. 6, 2021, Trump’s endless “stop the steal” appeals produced the inevitable violent result in an attempted insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Public opinion polls confirmed Trump’s hold on the minds of his followers. Despite Trump losing all 62 lawsuits claiming fraud in the 2020 election, and even after witnessing the violence at the Capitol, fully two-thirds of Republicans and 61% of white evangelical protestants said they believed the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

The Big Lie has had remarkable staying power among the MAGA base. Trump turned affirmation of the Big Lie into a loyalty test for administration appointments in his second term. And as they were casting their ballots in the 2024 election, PRRI data revealed that majorities of Republicans and white evangelicals (62% and 56% respectively), compared to only 31% of the public, continued to believe this false claim.


“The 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump.” (Graphic courtesy of PRRI)

Just this week, ahead of the fifth anniversary of the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Trump installed his Big Lie onto an ominous-looking page at the official White House website. The page includes intentionally glitchy black and white photos of the members of Congress who served on the bipartisan “House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol,” while featuring cheery color photos of insurrectionists — several holding stuffed animals and their kids — who are labeled “patriots.” The narrative on that page turns the truth of that day on its head, reasserting the Big Lie and blaming the Democrats for the violence:


The Democrats masterfully reversed reality after January 6, branding peaceful patriotic protesters as “insurrectionists” and framing the event as a violent coup attempt orchestrated by Trump—despite no evidence of armed rebellion or intent to overthrow the government. In truth, it was the Democrats who staged the real insurrection by certifying a fraud-ridden election, ignoring widespread irregularities, and weaponizing federal agencies to hunt down dissenters….

These distortions of reality are not the first to happen on government websites under the Trump regime (see the widespread erasure of the contributions of women and people of color across various agency websites), but they are the most flagrant.

They represent a new stage in the backsliding of America away from democracy. This desecration of the truth is a signal that the White House and the U.S. government, under this regime, have now officially become the propaganda machine for a mythomaniac and would-be dictator.

It is a mark of our time, in this second coming of the Trump regime, that Trump’s lies are no longer surprising. His lying is so expected that I doubt we’ll see any media outlet attempting to quantify them as they did during his first term. Today, the lies aren’t just spewing from Trump’s mouth during rants at rallies or late-night insomnia-induced tirades on social media. They are now propagating on official government websites from the Oval Office to the Department of Homeland Security to the National Park Service to the Centers for Disease Control. We now must accept that nothing we read on official government websites can be trusted.



These cynical attacks on truth are also deadly. On Jan. 6, 2021, Trump’s Big Lie resulted in the deaths of one U.S. Capitol Police officer, along with four insurrectionists. It also contributed to the deaths of four other U.S. Capitol Police officers, who took their own lives after the experience of being violently assaulted by their fellow citizens.

And just yesterday, the evidence suggests that Renee Nicole Good — a U.S. citizen and mother of three — was shot and killed in cold blood by an ICE officer while trying to drive away. Trump is lying about the encounter. “She behaved horribly,” Mr. Trump asserted in an interview with The New York Times. “And then she ran him over. She didn’t try to run him over. She ran him over.” The video evidence — independently analyzed and verified by Bellingcat, The New York Times Visual Investigation Team and The Washington Post’s Visual Forensic team — clearly contradicts Trump’s claims.


(Screen grab from video by Caitlin Callenson, Minneapolis.)

While some media outlets continue to hedge, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey is mincing no words. In a passionate and courageous public response, he said, “This was an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying, getting killed … What I can tell you is the narrative that this was just done in self-defense is a garbage narrative that is not true … It has no truth, and it needs to be stated very clearly.”

If we trace the chain of events that caused ICE agents to be deployed to Minneapolis in the first place, they are anchored in Trump’s lies. Trump has openly claimed that Minneapolis is being targeted because of its large Somali population, which is predominately Black and Muslim (a largely refugee population, by the way, that was assisted with resettlement by Lutheran Social Services with government support). At a cabinet meeting in December, as more than 2,000 ICE agents were first being deployed to Minnesota, Trump went on a racist screed, describing Somalia as a country that “stinks and we don’t want them in our country.” He went on to compare Somalis to “garbage” and falsely claimed that Somali gangs had “taken over” Minnesota and were “roving the streets looking for ‘prey.’”

We can trace a direct line from those racist lies by our president to the death of Renee Good. And to the 14 other shootings by ICE officers that have happened since late July. Just yesterday, ICE agents reportedly shot two more people at a traffic stop in Portland, Oregon, and then fled the scene before local police arrived. And I haven’t even mentioned the funerals for dozens of people, including civilians, killed in American strikes on Venezuela. Without Trump’s lies, all of these people would be with their families today.

There will be more of all of this to come in 2026: lies that beget violence and death, which beget more lies. We’ll need to grasp that living out the simple Christian dictum “the truth shall set you free” will be a dangerous task in Trump’s 2026 America.

With an ICE budget of $170 billion that was designated in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” (a figure large enough to effectively end homelessness in America, by the way), Trump’s lies are being manifested in the president’s own shock troops, guns and concentration camps. And they are, eventually, coming for all of us if we do not rise up en masse in the name of truth this year.

(Robert P. Jones is president and founder of the Public Religion Research Institute and the author, most recently, of “The Hidden Roots of White Supremacy and the Path to a Shared American Future.” This article first appeared on his Substack newsletter. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of RNS.)


Trump's attacks on Renee Good part of MAGA's 'war on empathy': analysis


U.S. President Donald Trump reacts to a question about the the fatal shooting in Minnesota, in which a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent fatally shot Renee Nicole Good, in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 9, 2026. 
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

January 09, 2026 
ALTERNET

Slate Senior Writer Christina Cauterucci says the right is waging a "war on empathy," and the fatal shooting of Minneapolis mother Renee Good shows just how close they’ve come to winning.

“Among their base, today’s GOP is trying to drum out any natural impulses toward compassion, such that there is no imperative to feel — let alone express — any dismay at the killing of an ideological adversary. If Good wasn’t on Trump’s side, the party line goes, she got what was coming to her,” said Cauterucci. “The rush to defend Ross is more than a political move to justify Trump’s personal militia run amok. It’s another round in the right wing’s mounting war on empathy.”

Influential Christian conservatives have been proclaiming empathy as toxic and sinful, arguing that using caring for others as a means to sway righteous Americans toward liberal causes, such as eradicating racism or feeding the poor. It’s the argument that makes letting 500,000 children die worldwide more palatable, in addition to “Medicaid cuts, SNAP freezes, ICE raids, refugee bans, and forced childbirth.”

She also noted that Tesla and SpaceX CEO (and Trump donor) Elon Musk calls empathy “the fundamental weakness of Western civilization.”

“In this worldview, anyone who poses a danger to those within the inner circles of human worthiness does not warrant much empathy. And it’s easy enough to argue that just about anyone is a threat to one’s family, town, or country, thus exempting them from our responsibilities of care,” said Cauterucci, who named examples such as “a drag queen” or “a liberal judge.” This, she said, could also apply to “someone wearing a Zohran Mamdani T-shirt at the grocery store” or, more recently, “a concerned Minnesotan who stopped to film the agents plucking people out of her community.”

“Once a person is no longer worthy of empathy, they become a justifiable casualty in service to any political aim,” Cauterucci argued. “There is no need to consider proportionality; killing someone for distracting ICE agents is just as defensible as ending a life on a battlefield. From the right’s perspective, Good’s political views made her fair game, so her gruesome, untimely death by the gun of a masked federal agent need not be met with outrage or remorse. Any empathy for her or her family imperils a greater project: cleansing Minneapolis of immigrants.”

From there, Cauterucci said there is a very short distance from “believing someone’s death is unworthy of mourning to believing they deserved to die.” And eventually to “inciting more death.”

“Every falsehood spun by Trump and his acolytes is an attempt to degrade their followers’ capacity for empathy past the point of flinching at an innocent woman’s death,” Cauterucci. “The goal is to diminish the ghastliness of Good’s death, and with it, the value of her life.”

Read Cauterucci's full slate column at this link (subscription required).


JD Vance Says Americans Should Actually Thank ICE Agent Who Killed Renee Good

“This is a guy who’s actually done a very, very important job for the United States of America,” Vance said.

January 9, 2026

Vice President JD Vance speaks during a press briefing in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House in Washington, D.C. on January 8, 2026.Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Images

Vice President JD Vance said on Thursday that Americans outraged by the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis should actually be thanking, not criticizing, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer who shot the 37-year-old mother of three.

In a press conference in the White House the day after Good was killed, Vance repeated the lie that Good hit the officer, identified as Jonathan Ross, with her car. He said that Good’s death was a “tragedy of her own making,” while the real victim is Ross, who he painted as an essential agent of the law.

“This is a guy who’s actually done a very, very important job for the United States of America,” Vance said, asking for prayers for Ross and condemning the media for reports on the killing. “He’s been assaulted, he’s been attacked, he’s been injured because of it. He deserves a debt of gratitude.”

Vance referred to an incident from June, in which court documents say Ross broke the car window of a man who wasn’t complying with a traffic stop and reached inside. The man tried to drive away, with Ross’s arm reportedly “stuck” inside the car, and Ross was dragged, requiring stitches.

“So you think maybe he is a little bit sensitive about somebody ramming him with an automobile?” Vance said, suggesting that Ross’s past trauma justifies him killing Good, the latter of whom he painted as “a victim of left-wing ideology.”


Trump Blames Woman Killed by ICE Agent in Minneapolis for Her Own Death
Analysis of the incident shows the ICE agent was in no real danger before opening fire on Renee Nicole Good. 
By Chris Walker , Truthout  January 8, 2026

During the press conference, Vance also said that Ross has “absolute immunity” to act under his job. Experts dismissed this as patently untrue.

But it suggests that Vance believes that not even the slightest amount of accountability — not even just public criticism — of Ross is acceptable, considering that the vice president believes that Ross shouldn’t be prosecuted for his actions. Nothing short of total fealty to Ross is sufficient, Vance’s comments seemingly suggest.

Reporting has found that Good was a poet, wife, and a devout Christian. She was on the way home from dropping off her youngest child at elementary school when Ross killed her.

Analyses from multiple news outlets, including The New York TimesNBCThe Washington Post, and more, have undercut the administration’s narrative that Ross was in danger. They have found that Good was, in fact, moving away from Ross when he shot her — and, further, have shown Good was trying to wave officers by, and that officers instead tried to stop her, with Ross purposefully positioning himself in front of her running car.

Further, CNN reported on Thursday that new footage of the shooting showed that Good had arrived minutes before ICE officers did, and wasn’t blocking any cars from being able to proceed on the street. It also showed that Ross was easily able to move out of the way of the car.

Critics have also noted, however, that Good’s use of lethal force was unjustified regardless of the details of the incident.

Trump's DHS has 'repeatedly been caught' in outright lies: analysis

President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Florida on July 1, 2025 (DHS photo by Tia Dufour/Flickr)

January 09, 2026 |
  ALTERNET

MS NOW data journalist Philip Bump says the public should no longer take the word of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) seriously anymore.

“The skepticism one ought to bring to any pronouncement of [President Donald] Trump should similarly be applied to those who work for and defend him. Particularly when — as in the case of the Department of Homeland Security — those officials have repeatedly been caught in fabrications of their own,” Bump said.

Trump is a liar, said Bump. And he hires liars to work for him, even in federal departments where credibility is central to function. This includes the justice department.

“The president has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness in the past decade to make false claims that impugn his opponents or celebrate his allies — or both,” said Bump. “This approach has permeated the government, carried into individual agencies by the loyal allies he’s installed as their leaders.

The Department of Justice offers countless examples of uttering blatant falsehoods. Trump officials claim DHS is targeting immigrants who have committed crimes, but Bump said the number of detainees “arrested by ICE without convictions or pending criminal charges rose from 842 on Dec. 1, 2024, to 21,892 on Nov. 30, 2025 — an astounding 2,500 percent increase.”

When the Cato Institute reported that only 5 percent of ICE detainees have convictions for violent crimes, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin claimed their pie chart was a lie. But when a Cato rep posted a DHS document confirming the data, McLaughlin knew better than to reply, and didn’t. McLaughlin has also lied that the U.S. does not arrest or deport U.S. citizens in defiance of proof. In fact, in November online news site Zeteo posted a list of seven incidents of McLaughlin being caught making false claims. That list did not include the department’s false claim that a U.S. mother shot and killed by ICE agents in Minneapolis was a “domestic terrorist” who tried to use her vehicle as a “weapon” despite video evidence proving otherwise.

Even federal judges have acknowledged the lapsing credibility of the DOJ, with U.S. District Court Judge Sara Ellis issuing a 233-page November ruling relating to a lawsuit over the excessive use of force in Chicago, by ICE agents.

“While Defendants may argue that the Court identifies only minor inconsistencies, every minor inconsistency adds up, and at some point, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to believe almost anything that Defendants represent,” Ellis wrote, adding in the same document that Trump’s department officials are “simply not credible.”

“One might wonder why agents of the federal government would consistently misrepresent the actions of their agency and its employees,” said Bump. “Some of it might be explained by their desire to show allegiance to their workforce. Some might be ascribed to errors or incomplete information. But we cannot assume that this is the sole motivation when the government agency at issue is part of the Trump administration.”

Read the MS NOW report at this link.
















After Renee Good, are you really going to keep pretending Trump and Vance are pro-life?


(RNS) — The deeds of the Trump administration have stood in sharp contrast to the reassuring words they have offered to religious believers.


Vice President JD Vance speaks as President Donald Trump listens during a meeting in the East Room of the White House, Friday, Jan. 9, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)


Steven P. Millies
January 9, 2026
RNS

(RNS) — Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, was killed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jonathan Ross on Wednesday (Jan. 7), at the site of an ICE enforcement in Minneapolis. She was shot three times while driving away from Agent Ross.

“We vow to celebrate and support every heroic mother who chooses life.” — Vice President JD Vance, 2025, March for Life

Ms. Good was a U.S. citizen and an observer, one of countless people in American communities who have sacrificed their convenience and put their own safety at risk to ensure their neighbors might feel a little more secure during the Trump administration’s deportation campaign.

“We will always stand for the sanctity of life and protect the most innocent and vulnerable in our society.” — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, 2021

The enforcement action that cost Ms. Good her life was a part of the Department of Homeland Security’s “Operation Metro Surge,” which began on Jan. 5. It is too soon to know who the 150 or so detainees are who have been swept up by the 2,000 agents deployed to the Twin Cities. But the New York Times reports 70% of those detained by ICE since deportations began have no criminal convictions, and ICE operations have grabbed an unknown but not insubstantial number of U.S. citizens or others in the U.S. legally.

“I was saved by God to make America great again.” — President Donald Trump, 2025 Inaugural Address

This second Trump administration came to power on the strength of overwhelming support from Roman Catholics and other Christians who are motivated, pro-life voters. The support of important Catholic and evangelical leaders has been critical to make this second term possible.

“I was proud to be the most pro-life president in U.S. history.” — Donald Trump, 2022

No matter how clear the Bible is about welcoming the stranger — a theme to which the Old Testament returns over 90 times — there is some considerable, partisan division among Christians about immigration policy. Yet protecting human life, we can feel sure, has been something Christians of all stripes have generally found it easy to agree about.

“Every human life is a gift to the world.” — President Donald Trump, 2021



People gather for a vigil after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a woman earlier in the day, Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Bruce Kluckhohn)

That is why, quite naturally, the tone coming from the Trump administration since Ms. Good’s life was taken by an ICE agent has been so jarring. President Trump described Ms. Good as behaving “viciously” and gives an impression that she had forfeited her right to her own life.

“Reverence for every human life, one of the values for which our Founding Fathers fought, defines the character of our Nation.” — President Donald Trump, 2018, Proclamation for National Sanctity of Human Life Day

Republicans who have long championed protecting human life have said shocking things. Texas congressman and Senate candidate Wesley Hunt suggested that “you get to keep your life” only if you obey government. That’s un-American. But it also does not sound much like the Rep. Hunt who has previously championed the sanctity of life.

“I am pro-life.” — Representative Wesley Hunt, June 20, 2019

Perhaps strangest of all is a zealous Roman Catholic like Vice President JD Vance, whose absence of sympathy for Ms. Good and her loved ones has been shocking. He called Ms. Good a “deranged leftist,” as though she were a member of some other, less worthy species without any sign that his Catholic faith found her killing in the least way to be problematic.

“Christianity, Imago Dei, the idea that we are all made in the image of our Creator, means that we must respect the free will of every single person.” — Vice President JD Vance, Oct. 30, 2025

When JD Vance speaks about unborn human beings and voices his opposition to abortion, he is uncompromisingly clear.

“We march to protect the unborn; we march to proclaim and live out the sacred truth that every single child is a miracle and a gift from God.” — Vice President JD Vance, 2025 March for Life

Ms. Good once was a child. She was born. She grew into an adult whose free will led her to observe ICE enforcements. Yet, where her killing is concerned, the vice president gives no sign of his respect for her free will or her life. Neither does he show any compassion for her family. Simply because he disagrees with her, he seems to say her killing was acceptable.

“President Trump will be the most pro-family, most pro-life American president of our lifetimes.” — Vice President JD Vance, 2025, March for Life

The Roman Catholic Church to which Vance belongs is unambiguous about deportations, authoritatively calling them “infamies” and a “supreme dishonor to the Creator.” Catholics can have good-faith disagreements about the best way to have a just immigration policy. But the inhumanity and violence (that includes denying rights to exercise religious belief) accompanying this administration’s immigration enforcement is not something Catholics should see very differently.

“I stand for everything that you stand for and that the church stands for.” — Donald Trump, 2024, interview with Raymond Arroyo (EWTN)

What is happening now — from masked agents acting with impunity to inhumane detention conditions to the shootings in our streets — was all foreseeable before so many religiously motivated voters gave Trump their support again.

“God has given you a sound mind, make wise decisions, use discernment and everything, but above all he’s called us to love each other.” — Gov. Kristi Noem, 2024, Speech at the Faith & Freedom Coalition

Even if the first Trump administration that ended with the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol weren’t enough to tell us what a vote for Trump and Vance would mean, the 2024 campaign was clear about their intentions when it came to immigrants and deportations, saying immigrants have “poisoned the blood of our country” and that his administration would “stop the invasion very quickly.”

“Every person is worth protecting. And above all, we know that every human soul is divine, and every human life — born and unborn — is made in the holy image of Almighty God.” — President Donald Trump, 2020, March for Life

Mass deportations — a phrase that conjures the darkest chapters in human history — was their goal. That has included people who came to the United States for protection, seeking asylum. There always were limits on who a second Trump administration would protect. Now we know a conscientious citizen like Renee Good, whose memory Trump again insulted today, was beyond their care.

“Today, we focus our attention on the love and protection each person, born and unborn, deserves.” — President Donald Trump, 2018, Proclamation for National Sanctity of Human Life Day

For too long, the deeds of the Trump administration have stood in sharp contrast to the reassuring words they have offered to religious believers. It has become impossible to ignore, but it should not surprise us. Years ago, Trump wrote in The Art of the Deal about telling people what they “want to believe” in order to get what he wants. The question for religious voters now is what they actually believe. So much effort went into electing Trump. The costs and the real meaning of all that no longer can be denied — maybe even by Trump.

“I think it’s horrible to watch. No, I hate to see it.” — President Donald Trump, Jan. 8, 2026, shown video of his administration’s agent killing Renee Good

Will it make any difference?

AMERIKAN FASCISM
ICE’s Murder of Renee Nicole Good Was Not an Aberration — It Is the New Normal


US immigration agents have now shot 11 civilians in cars in four months.


By Mike Ludwig , 
January 9, 2026

People tend to a memorial for Renee Nicole Good near the site of her shooting, on January 8, 2026, in Minneapolis, Minnesota.Stephen Maturen / Getty Images

The killing of Renee Nicole Good by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in an otherwise quiet South Minneapolis neighborhood on Wednesday was just the latest in a string of violent attacks on local residents by immigration officials.

“Immediately after, the same masked agents were faced with our grieving neighbors, rightfully demanding justice for a murder committed in our streets, and only continued to escalate,” said Minneapolis Council member Aisha Chughtai in a post after arriving at the scene on Thursday. “They shoved people to the ground, drove recklessly into crowds and deployed chemical irritants.”

The shooting follows a clear pattern of violence in cities with Democratic Party mayors across the country: Immigration police enter neighborhoods to aggressively arrest people off the street, including many U.S. citizens, and clash with concerned residents and local activists, then blame the victims when people get hurt or killed.

ICE agent Jonathan Ross fired three fatal shots into Good’s Honda Pilot as she turned and drove past him. Just before that moment, another masked federal officer had aggressively tried to drag Good from the car. At the time, Ross’s killing of Good was the ninth reported time an immigration agent had shot an unarmed civilian inside of their vehicle in the past four months, according to The New York Times. In each case, immigration officials claimed to shoot in self-defense and cited their fear of being hit by the vehicles.

Yet another shooting of a civilian by a U.S. immigration agent occurred one day later in Portland, Oregon, where the U.S. Border Patrol shot two people during a traffic stop on Thursday. Both people were hospitalized by local first responders and subsequently identified by federal authorities. As of Friday afternoon, their conditions haven’t been disclosed. Echoing the killing in Minneapolis, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claims the driver attempted to ram the officer with his vehicle.




“We know what the federal government says happened here,” Portland Mayor Keith Wilson told reporters on Thursday. “There was a time when we could take them at their word. That time has long passed.”

Rep. Janelle Bynum (D-Oregon) said President Donald Trump’s immigration agents are engaged in “state-sponsored terrorism.”

“Stop fucking with us,” Bynum said in a statement. “This is the second shooting this week by agents following the orders of a wannabe dictator who is trying to take over cities and rule by instilling terror in the hearts of American people.”

Meanwhile, prosecutors in Chicago recently dropped felony charges against Marimar Martinez, a woman who was shot multiple times by a Border Patrol agent after a vehicle collision in October. The case against Marimer fell apart as defense attorneys threatened to release texts in court showing the agent making crude boats about the attack in chats with fellow officers. Chicago prosecutors have recently similarly dropped charges against dozens of other protesters as well.

Activists in Chicago are also seeking justice for Silverio Villegas González, who was shot and killed in September by ICE agents who claimed that he tried to run them over with his car. While DHS publicly reported the ICE agents as having sustained significant injuries, an agent described them as “nothing major.”


Vance wrongly claimed that immigration officers have “absolute immunity” under federal law, sending a dangerous signal to the 12,000 ICE agents newly recruited under Trump about the amount of violence they may be able to enact without accountability.

Back in Minneapolis, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem accused Good of being an agitator and “domestic terrorist” after the fatal shooting, claims that are directly contradicted by video evidence and witnesses at the scene.

On Thursday, as the federal investigators blocked their state counterparts in Minnesota from accessing evidence from the scene, Trump administration officials doubled down on unfounded claims that Ross acted properly and in self-defense when he shot and killed Good, a narrative Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey called “garbage” and “bullshit.” The killing occurred after Trump sent 2,000 federal agents to Minneapolis for what ICE officials called “the largest immigration operation ever.”

In a social media post, Vice President J.D. Vance smeared Good as a “deranged leftist,” but he later admitted during a press briefing that he knew little about the 37-year-old woman and said he could not comment on her motivations at the time of the killing.

Vance also wrongly claimed that immigration officers have “absolute immunity” under federal law, sending a dangerous signal to the 12,000 ICE agents newly recruited under Trump about the amount of violence they may be able to enact without accountability from the highest levels of government. ICE recruitment materials and the Department of Homeland Security’s social media posts are notorious for sharing white nationalist imagery and likening immigration enforcement to playing violent video games.

Activists have documented ICE’s civil rights violations under both Democratic and Republican presidents, but Vance’s statements make clear how deeply politicized ICE has become in Trump’s second term. Good was a poet and loving mother, not to mention a citizen whom Vance was elected to serve. By smearing anyone concerned about ICE activities in their neighborhoods as “deranged” and “left-wing radicals,” Vance reinforces ICE as an enforcer of MAGA ideology.

It is clear that cracking down on dissent and framing peaceful protest as “domestic terrorism” has now become a key plank of Trump’s immigration crackdown.

While Trump issues orders conflating “anti-fascism” and left-wing social movements with “domestic terrorism,” ICE has inked at least $25 million in contracts with Big Tech for the latest in spy technology, including social media monitoring systems, cellphone location tracking, facial recognition, and remote hacking tools, according to the Brennan Center.

In September 2025, Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said the agency would use all of the agency’s resources, which includes the powerful Homeland Security Investigations division, to “track the money” and find activist “ringleaders,” suggesting without evidence that ICE protesters in Chicago were “outside agitators” who were paid to be there. The baseless claims reflect far-right and antisemitic conspiracy theories about philanthropists such as George Soros, a frequent target of Trump’s personal attacks.

“Over the past two decades, the staggering increase in government surveillance abilities has come with warnings that this power could be used to run roughshod over Americans’ free speech and privacy rights,” Brennan Center analysts Faiza Patel and Matthew Ruppert wrote in November. “With the Trump administration’s explicit campaign of using federal law enforcement — including ICE — to target its political opponents, that time has come.”

As Truthout and The Intercept have reported, ICE quietly subpoenaed Meta as part of an “official, criminal investigation regarding officer safety,” last year, demanding personal information attached to Instagram accounts used by activists to track ICE operations and warn the public. Civil liberties groups pushed back in court and warned of serious overreach; ICE only has a mandate to enforce immigration law, not criminal law against U.S. citizens.

By wrongly casting constitutionally protected acts such as filming immigration police in your own neighborhood as a “criminal” threat, which Trump officials have repeatedly done, Trump leverages the immigration crackdown to target two of MAGA’s perceived enemies at once: undocumented people, and local activists perceived as “leftist” because they care about their immigrant neighbors.

In a comment to New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said ICE is sending a message with its killing of Good.

“‘You want to defend your neighbors, you’re going to do it at the risk of your own life.’ I think that’s the unmistakable message,” said Ellison, who has vowed to seek justice for Good despite federal obstruction. “Just looking at the tape, they could have said, ‘You get out of here,’ right? And then she gets out of there. They didn’t want her to get out of there. They wanted to either drag her out of that car or do what they did.”

This pattern has emerged as the Trump administration has unleashed more brutality into the already violent immigration policing infrastructure.

For years ICE has been accused of violating human rights while avoiding transparency and accountability, including within its notorious jails, where at least 32 people have died while in ICE custody since Trump took office. Trump has now transformed the agency into an authoritarian weapon that can be deployed into any community across the United States — and against anyone perceived to oppose his regime.

Growing tensions signal Trump moving closer to 'martial law': analysis

An East African teen is questioned by members of the U.S. Border Patrol, as immigration enforcement action continues, days after the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S., January 9, 2026. REUTERS/Tim Evans
January 09, 2026
ALTERNET

The fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good by a U.S. Customs and Enforcement (ICE) agent in Minneapolis was followed by large protests all over the United States, from Portland, Oregon to Philadelphia (where a crowd of demonstrators gathering outside City Hall).

Allies of President Donald Trump are aggressively defending the agent and claiming that he acted in self-defense, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Vice President JD Vance. Noem even described Good as a "domestic terrorist." But many others on both the left and the right are attacking the shooting as excessive force, and former Judge Andrew Napolitano — a right-wing libertarian/conservative legal analyst for Newsmax — believes that the agent should face criminal charges.

Good's death came four days after U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and transported him to a federal detention center in New York City. And Salon's Brian Karem, in an article published on January 9, draws a parallel between the two events — both of which, Karem argues, show that Trump is feeling increasingly emboldened.

"(Trump) Administration officials used nearly the same language in describing Renee Nicole Good as they did the alleged narco-terrorists," Karem notes. "Trump said she was 'very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self-defense.' He also blamed the death on the 'Radical Left' and said they are 'threatening, assaulting and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis.'"

Karem fears that Trump will use the outrage following Good's death as a pretext to impose martial law and cancel the 2026 midterms.

"Trump is hell-bent, along with those who work for him, on total control," Karem warns. "Good's death is likely to foment more anger and hatred, both of which Trump bathes in. Should something nasty befall ICE officers, Trump would gladly declare martial law. And speculation is rife that he could cancel the midterm elections — since he's scared to death he’ll be impeached should the Democrats regain control of Congress in November…. Renee Nicole Good is an example of how Trump villainizes American citizens. Maduro shows how Trump exploits the villainy of other villains. The oil tankers are symbolic of his greed and reality-show tendencies."

Karem adds, "All three of these examples show that the consequences of Trump are very real and increasingly acute. At this point, they are painfully and terrifyingly obvious. Be prepared for martial law."

Brian Karem's full article for Salon is available at this link.




Portland Mayor Decries Mounting Bloodshed, Tells ICE to Get Out After Federal Agents Shoot Two

“As mayor, I call on ICE to end all operations in Portland until a full investigation can be completed,” said Keith Wilson, the Democratic mayor of Portland, Oregon.



People gather in Portland, Oregon on January 7, 2026 for a vigil for Renee Good, who was killed by an ICE agent in Minneapolis.
(Photo by Natalie Behring/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Jan 09, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The mayor of Portland, Oregon told Immigration and Customs Enforcement to leave the city after federal agents shot and wounded two people on Thursday, just a day after an ICE agent killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis.

“We cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts,” Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said in a statement. “Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences. As mayor, I call on ICE to end all operations in Portland until a full investigation can be completed.”

The shooting took place Thursday afternoon during what the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) described as a “targeted vehicle stop” conducted by Border Patrol agents. Echoing its narrative about the deadly Minneapolis shooting—which was contradicted by video footage from the scene—DHS said the driver “weaponized his vehicle and attempted to run over the law enforcement agents.”

But Wilson said Thursday that the Trump administration could not be trusted to provide an accurate account of events or conduct an honest investigation.

“We know what the federal government says happened here,” said Wilson. “There was a time when we could take them at their word. That time has long passed.”

The man and woman shot by Border Patrol agents were reportedly married, and both were taken to a nearby hospital. Neither their identities nor their conditions were immediately made public.

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said late Thursday that his office was investigating the shooting to determine “whether any federal officer acted outside the scope of their lawful authority.”

“We have been clear about our concerns with the excessive use of force by federal agents in Portland, and today’s incident only heightens the need for transparency and accountability,” said Rayfield. “Oregonians deserve clear answers when people are injured in their neighborhoods.”

The shootings in Minneapolis and Portland were hardly the first time federal immigration officers have used deadly force during US President Donald Trump’s lawless mass deportation campaign.

The Marshall Project noted earlier this week that “federal officers have fatally shot at least three other people in the last five months.”

“Agents have also shot other people,” The Marshall Project added. “The Trace, the nonprofit news organization covering gun violence, has counted more than a dozen such shootings. In some cases, the victims survived, including a woman who suffered multiple bullet wounds in an incident in Chicago in October. The Border Patrol officer who shot her appeared to brag about it in a text message, later presented in court evidence. The message reportedly read, ‘I fired 5 rounds, and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book boys.’”















'I'm not mad!' New video of Renee Good shows calm exchange before she was shot


Cellphone video of Renee Nicole Good moments before she was shot on January 7, 2026 (Image: Screengrab via Alpha News / X)

January 09, 2026
ALTERNET

A new video has emerged of the moments just before Minneapolis, Minnesota resident Renee Nicole Good was fatally shot by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross.

On Friday, Minnesota-based conservative site Alpha News posted cellphone video that appears to have been taken by Ross prior to him shooting Good — a 37 year-old U.S. citizen and mother of three. The person filming is seen walking around Good's vehicle, and when filming Good's face, she's seen smiling and talking to the videographer. The video also shows a dog in the backseat of Good's vehicle.

"That's fine, dude! I'm not mad at you," Good is heard saying.

After the person filming captures the car's license plate, one person filming the ICE officer is heard in the background saying: "That's OK, we don't change our plates every morning, just so you know. It'll be the same plate when you come talk to us later."

As the confrontation between the ICE agent and the person filming the agent continues, a masked ICE agent is seen walking toward Good, and is heard saying: "Get out of the car. Get out of the f—— car." The person who was filming the ICE agent also tries to open into the passenger-side door.

At that point, Good attempts to drive away from the scene. She's seen in the video turning her steering wheel all the way to the right before accelerating. Then, the videographer's phone points away from the scene and several gunshots are heard. After Good's car slams to a stop, a person in the background can be heard saying: "F—— b——."

Watch the video below:



Hochul, Mamdani Unveil Free, Universal Child Care Expansion in New York

The announcement marks a key step toward Mamdani’s pledge of free care for children under 5 in New York City.
January 9, 2026

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani addresses the crowd at an event announcing expansions for free and affordable childcare programs in New York City and across the state of New York, held at the Flatbush Branch YMCA in New York City, New York, United States on January 8, 2026.Jason Alpert-Wisnia / Hans Lucas / AFP via Getty Images

New York Governor Kathy Hochul and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani unveiled a plan to provide free child care for 2-year-olds and expand other child care support for thousands more children across the state on Thursday, in one of the first major steps toward fulfilling Mamdani’s campaign pledge of universal access.

The governor said that the state is fully funding the first two years of a free child care program for children under 2 years old in New York City, which the government will first unroll in areas of high need. The politicians are also teaming up to expand the city’s program to provide free child care and education for 3-year-olds, known as 3K.

Further, the governor has proposed ensuring universal pre-kindergarten access across the state by the end of the 2028-2029 school year.

In all, the plan — which also expands child care subsidies for thousands of families — will make an additional nearly 100,000 children eligible for city- and state-supported child care programs, the officials said.

The proposed expansion will cost $1.7 billion, according to the governor’s office, dipping into existing state funds, and will go to the state legislature for approval.


Trump Threatens Child Care Funding Across the US After Bogus Social Media Claim
Reports of a nationwide freeze came after a video with debunked claims circulated social media this week. By Sharon Zhang , Truthout  January 2, 2026


“This is the day that everything changes,” said Hochul at a news conference on the proposal, at a child care center in a YMCA in Brooklyn. “The era of empty promises ends with the two of us, right here, right now.”

The proposal marks a key step toward fulfilling Mamdani’s campaign pledge of providing free child care for all children under 5 in the city.

“To those who doubt the power of the people to make their own destiny, to the cynics who insist that politics is too broken to deliver meaningful change, to those who think that the promises of a campaign cannot survive once confronted with the realities of government, today is your answer,” Mamdani said.

The plan is a blow against Mamdani’s naysayers on the campaign trail who dismissed his ideas as unrealistic. It comes amid a child care crisis across the country, with care becoming increasingly unaffordable and sparse.

The policy stands in sharp contrast to the Trump administration, which is seeking to slash child care access. This week, reports found that the Trump administration is freezing $10 billion in funds for child care in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, while it investigates supposed fraud after a debunked video by a right-wing influencer, Nick Shirley, circulated last week.

It’s unclear if the administration’s funding freeze will affect the announcement, as Hochul has proposed using existing state funding for the expansion, but other elements of the state’s child care spending may be at risk. New York Attorney General Letitia James is leading a lawsuit of the affected states against the Trump administration for freezing the funds.

Vance Announces New Deputy AG Role to Root Out Supposed “Fraud”

The Trump administration has frequently cited fraud as a basis for cutting benefits for US residents.
January 9, 2026

Vice President JD Vance speaks during a news briefing in the White House on January 8, 2026.Alex Wong / Getty Images

On Thursday, Vice President JD Vance announced the creation of a new position within the Department of Justice (DOJ) with broad authority to investigate “fraud.”

The Trump administration has frequently cited fraud as a basis for cutting or undermining rights or benefits for U.S. residents — particularly fraud they assert is due to immigration. Recently, for example, the White House blocked $10 billion in federal expenditures for child care and other services in five Democratic-controlled states. Those states are now suing the administration to have the funds released.

In his statement, Vance said a person has already been selected for the position, but did not name them. He also said the person would serve in a deputy attorney general role.

“This is the person who is going to make sure we stop defrauding the American people,” Vance claimed, frequently invoking fraud in Minnesota that is being investigated by federal officials.

That fraud inquiry, however, was inspired in large part by debunked “reporting” from a right-wing YouTube personality, who alleged widespread fraud among Somali residents who are receiving federal funding to manage daycare centers. While fraud involving some federal monies has occurred, conservative social media channels have suggested that the scale of the fraud is far larger than it actually is.


Vance Blames Immigrants, Biden in Response to Affordability Questions
There is no significant relationship between immigration rates and rising housing costs in the US, experts have said.  By Chris Walker , Truthout  November 17, 2025


Immigrant rights advocates worry that the new fraud investigations will give authorities license to even further target and harass immigrants. “They’re doing these visits at day care sites under the auspices of conducting a fraud investigation, but if they happen to see anyone who fits a profile, they might be arrested,” said Ana Pottratz Acosta at the Immigration and Human Rights Clinic at the University of Minnesota Law School.

Vance explained that the new deputy attorney general’s mission of rooting out supposed fraud would indeed begin in Minnesota, but would expand to other parts of the country.

“We’re looking into broad investigative authority, to a number of instances of wrongdoing that we’ve seen in Minneapolis,” Vance said, leaving specifics out of his statement. “We want to expand this.”

Vance also explained that the new position will have “nationwide jurisdiction over the issue of fraud,” and that the individual would answer primarily to himself and to President Donald Trump.

The vice president alluded to the announcement in a Fox News interview earlier this week.

“I believe we’re gonna have some very big announcements in the next couple of days,” Vance said on Wednesday. “I don’t want to get ahead of the president, but we believe there is a nationwide fraud ring that’s rooted in illegal aliens and others taking advantage of the American welfare system.”

Vance has a sordid history of using immigrants as scapegoats to advance his political goals, even when allegations are overblown or, in many instances, are flat-out lies.

During the 2024 presidential campaign, for example, when Donald Trump peddled the racist lie that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating residents’ pets, Vance doubled down on the claim, eventually saying that he didn’t care if it was true or not, so long as it helped advance his agenda.

“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do,” Vance said.

The lies prompted multiple threats against residents in the city, including bomb threats, resulting in closures of public buildings and schools.


2025 Was the Worst Non-Recession Year for Jobs Growth Since 2003


Jobs this past year grew at a rate 70 percent slower than the year before Trump took office.


By Chris Walker , 
January 9, 2026

The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the jobs report for December on Friday, showing an unusual slowdown in growth for a month where consumer spending typically generates much higher numbers.

Job growth increased by around 50,000, the report noted. Unemployment remained relatively unchanged from November, going from 4.5 percent in that month to 4.4 percent in December.

The administration was quick to herald the job numbers as proof of a successful economy under President Donald Trump.

“The December jobs report confirms that 2025 was a blockbuster year of solid job growth thanks to the return President Trump’s America First leadership,” read a statement from Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer.

Yet the numbers were lower than in years past, and 2025 overall was lackluster for the president who promised to have a much better performance than his predecessor

“December’s jobs report closes out 2025 not with fireworks, but with a quiet fizzle,” said Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, adding:

After a year marked by tariffs, shutdown disruptions, and shifting economic currents, today’s numbers show an economy that is still moving along, but undeniably slower than where we began.

The addition of 50,000 jobs last month was the worst-performing December of the past decade, aside from the year of the COVID pandemic. Indeed, in no other year since 2015 (except 2020) did jobs fail to grow at any number smaller than 125,000, as December is a month in which more jobs typically show up due to rising demand associated with the holiday season.

2025 as a whole left much to be desired — aside from recession years over the past two decades, this past year had the worst rates of job growth for the U.S. since 2003.

During the 2024 campaign, Trump frequently claimed he would be a better president for jobs than former President Joe Biden. Yet 2025, Trump’s first year back in office, saw a 70 percent slower rate of job growth than the last full year of Biden’s presidency.

The numbers contradict the administration’s rosy outlook for the economy.

Last week, Trump praised his policies — specifically, his tariffs affecting the costs of imports from dozens of countries — for supposedly improving things on Wall Street, though the evidence for that claim is slim.

“The USA markets just hit another ALL TIME HIGH – ALL OF THEM!!! THANK YOU MISTER TARIFF!!!” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

But the celebratory nature of Trump’s remarks ignores an important point: While the wealthy are benefiting greatly from Trump’s economic policies, the vast majority of Americans are struggling, a phenomenon that experts call a K-shaped economy.

Job growth likely slowed because of those disparities, as it’s long been understood that the U.S. economy is driven largely by consumer spending. Due to rising prices and the uncertainty of what’s next regarding Trump’s tariffs, consumer confidence levels are shrinking, leading to less spending, and thus less need for workers within certain industries.

Democrats criticized the administration over its handling of the economy, citing the jobs report as evidence that Trump’s policies weren’t working.

“This disastrous jobs report makes it clear that this is not an ‘A++++ economy’ as President Trump claimed, it’s an economy at risk of sliding into recession,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-Virginia), the ranking member on the Joint Economic Committee.

“A year into President Trump’s second term, and he hasn’t delivered for working Americans. The job market is a mess, he’s imposed a national sales tax, and he’s trying to kick millions of Americans off their health care,” noted Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pennsylvania). “Trump simply doesn’t care about working families.”

Trump posting critical economic numbers on Truth Social is 'nuts': ex-treasury official


A broker is seen under the board of the DAX (German stock market index) at Frankfurt's stock exchange September 10, 2001.
January 09, 2026 
ALTERNET

Former Treasury Assistant Secretary Aaron Klein warned that President Donald Trump broke dangerous rules by sharing embargoed jobs report data Thursday night on social media.

“This jobs data moves whole markets,” said Klein, speaking on CNN. “You'll see the stock market move because the bond market will move because they're not sure what's going on in terms of the federal reserve. … This data is deeply guarded. It is released at once, released before the markets open at 8:30 in the morning.”


“Very few people have access to this data,” said Klein, a senior fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution. “I used to when I worked on Capitol hill, and I was a top staffer. The Joint Economic Committee would hold a hearing on this data, and you'd have to be in a lockup. You'd be in a locked room. … You couldn't have your phone or computer or anything. I'm in the lockup. Right? So, like, that's top-secret stuff that is market moving. That is legal stuff. And, for Trump to throw that on his website is nuts.”

The information that Trump was so eager to release actually preceded additional information revealing a sluggish economy in his first year, despite inheriting vigorous growth from former President Joe Biden.

“Well, look, Trump inherited — that’s been the story of his entire life okay? Trump inherited a strong economy. Then he started messing around with trade. He created a bunch of uncertainty. He moved data around,” said Klein. “… The tariffs on again, off again on again, off again. Maybe so. Maybe not — we don't know. And there's been a lot of movement up and down. But if you look over a whole year now, we have a whole year's worth of jobs data. You find an economy that came in with a lot of momentum and it's slowing and stalling a little bit.”

Klein added that the wealthy at the top of the U.S. market now “control so much of the wealth that they're able to perpetuate the economy” on their own, while the bottom group “is struggling and feeling uncertain.”

Watch the video below.
Oil Companies Are Key Partners in Trump’s Imperial Plans for Latin America


Stocks in ExxonMobil, Halliburton, and ConocoPhillips surged the day after Trump’s illegal attack on Venezuela.


By Derek Seidman ,
Truthout
January 8, 2026


People react to the news of the US's capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, in Doral, Florida, on January 3, 2026.GIORGIO VIERA / AFP via Getty Images

For months, U.S. President Donald Trump proclaimed that his pressure campaign against the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, backed by dozens of illegal killings through drone strikes, was about fighting drugs and cartels. But at his press conference after the U.S. abduction of Maduro, Trump couldn’t stop talking about oil.

“We’re gonna take back the oil,” Trump brazenly said. “Very large United States oil companies” will “go in” and “spend billions of dollars,” he promised. “We’re gonna be taking out a tremendous amount of wealth out of the ground.”

All told, Trump uttered the word “oil” at least 20 times during the press conference. Oil company stocks — ExxonMobil, Halliburton, ConocoPhillips, Valero, Phillips 66 — surged the following day, with Chevron, the only major U.S. oil corporation with a current foothold in Venezuela, seeing its share value jump more than 5 percent.

Further demonstrating the administration’s drug accusations to be mere propaganda, the Justice Department recently dropped its longstanding claim that Maduro was the head of “Cartel de los Soles,” implicitly conceding that it is indeed not a drug cartel but a slang term referring to political officials who have become corrupted by drug money.

The Trump administration’s barefaced imperial grab for Venezuela’s oil is fraught with challenges, and it’s far too early to predict what will happen. But its abduction of Maduro and effort to gain control over Venezuela’s oil industry aligns with the administration’s openly stated vision of reasserting undisputed political and economic hegemony across the Americas and the Caribbean, including control over natural resources and trade routes, through gunboat diplomacy backed by military threats. In doing so, Trump is looking to corporate allies like Chevron, which could stand to benefit handsomely from his administration’s action — though this is far from guaranteed.

“We’re seeing the confluence of two trends here,” Michael Klare, energy expert and defense correspondent for The Nation, told Truthout. “The first is Trump’s reassertion of U.S. dominance over the Western Hemisphere, and the second is an explicit focus on the acquisition of strategic raw materials as a key aspect of national security — and their denial to strategic competitors, like China.”

The “Trump Corollary”

While Trump has a reputation for acting erratically, the administration’s National Security Strategy report to the U.S. Congress, published in December 2025, suggests how the abduction of Maduro fits its wider imperial agenda.

The report calls for a shift from “permanent American domination of the entire world” to a new emphasis on “global and regional balances of power to prevent the emergence of dominant adversaries.”

Venezuela is home to around 17 percent of the world’s known oil reserves but currently accounts for less than 1 percent of global crude oil production.

Notably, the report advocates the naked and expanded assertion of U.S. hegemony across the Americas and Caribbean and the revival of the Monroe Doctrine — a two-century-old U.S. policy that has come to represent the U.S. assertion of the Western Hemisphere as its sphere of influence — through a new “Trump Corollary.”

The Trump Corollary posits that “the United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere” and aims to cultivate a U.S.-dominated network of compliant regimes — “enlist established friends” and “expand by cultivating and strengthening new partners” — across the region.

In his press conference, Trump was blunt. “Under our new national security strategy,” he said, “American dominance in the Western hemisphere will never be questioned again.”

Klare notes that “the assertion of U.S. dominance over the Western Hemisphere is hardly a new theme in American politics, but it’s been neglected in recent decades as the U.S. focused more on Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.”

“What Trump is saying is that we are going to refocus on the Western Hemisphere while downgrading our involvement in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East,” said Klare.

The U.S. abduction of Maduro sends an intimidating signal across the region. Administration officials have ramped up threats against Colombia and Cuba — sites of hemispheric opposition to U.S. power — and Greenland, with its geostrategic value and natural resources.

Venezuela — with the world’s largest known oil reserves, close ties to China and Russia, and avid opposition to U.S. empire — is a key target in the Trump administration’s imperial vision for the Americas and Caribbean.

“Venezuela and its oil lie at the nexus of two of Mr. Trump’s stated national security priorities: dominance of energy resources and control of the Western Hemisphere,” noted The New York Times.

Imperial Rivalry With China

Trump’s national security strategy states that his administration is openly pursuing “a Hemisphere that remains free of hostile foreign incursion or ownership of key assets” and alliances “contingent on winding down adversarial outside influence — from control of military installations, ports, and key infrastructure to the purchase of strategic assets broadly defined.”

This is a clear reference to China, the U.S.’s major global rival for markets, resources, and influence. China is South America’s top trading partner and has cultivated diplomatic ties and backed major infrastructure projects across the region.


As Truthout previously reported, the U.S. power struggle with China was a driving factor in Trump’s early 2025 effort to secure U.S. influence over two critical ports on the Panama Canal.

China is one of Venezuela’s top economic partners and has provided billions in financing for Venezuela in exchange for oil. China purchases around 80 percent of Venezuela’s oil exports.

“Control over Venezuelan [oil] supply would also allow Washington to squeeze China, currently Caracas’s largest buyer,” said the Financial Times.

U.S. Empire and Corporate Power


From artificial intelligence to resource extraction to projecting imperial power, Trump has looked to a core partner: U.S. corporations and the executives and owners who run the
In his effort to secure U.S. ownership over key Panama Canal ports, he turned to BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, and its billionaire CEO Larry Fink, strong-arming the sale of a portfolio of 43 global ports owned by Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison.

Trump’s national security policy bluntly promotes U.S. corporations as arms for hemispheric hegemony. “Successfully protecting our Hemisphere,” it states, “requires closer collaboration between the U.S. Government and the American private sector.”

“The U.S. Government will identify strategic acquisition and investment opportunities for American companies in the region,” it adds. All U.S. embassies must “be aware of major business opportunities in their country” and all U.S. foreign officials “should understand that part of their job is to help American companies compete and succeed,” it asserts.

Fossil fuels are central to Trump’s imperial vision. “Restoring American energy dominance (in oil, gas, coal, and nuclear) and reshoring the necessary key energy components is a top strategic priority,” states Trump’s natural security strategy.

One of Trump’s most loyal factions within the U.S. ruling class is composed of oil billionaires and fossil fuel companies, who splurged on his 2024 reelection campaign.

Fracking billionaire Harold Hamm, Trump’s top fossil fuel industry ally, has said “his company Continental Resources would consider investing in Venezuela under the right circumstances,” reported the Financial Times.

Chevron’s “Long Game”

“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” Trump declared at his press conference announcing Maduro’s kidnapping.

Venezuela is home to around 17 percent of the world’s known oil reserves but currently accounts for less than 1 percent of global crude oil production.

“The appeal is clear: Venezuela’s reserves are large, mapped and carry no exploration risk,” said the Financial Times, adding that “advances in technology have lowered the cost of producing heavy crude,” the kind of viscous oil in Venezuela that can be difficult to refine.

Chevron, which has a checkered human rights record in Latin America, is Venezuela’s top foreign investor.

Today, Chevron, which has a checkered human rights record in Latin America, is Venezuela’s top foreign investor and the only U.S. oil corporation with major operations in the country. Two other oil powerhouses, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, left Venezuela in 2007 after former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez nationalized foreign-owned oil fields.

Trump is a big fan of Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, who has praised the president on Fox News. Chevron was the top fossil fuel donor to Trump’s 2025 inauguration, shelling out $2 million. In January 2025, the company quickly recognized Trump’s attempt to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.

“Wirth and Trump are known to be tight,” said the Wall Street Journal, adding that “the men chat about Venezuela and other topics” and that “Trump and Wirth appear to agree that opportunity abounds in Venezuela.”

Wirth lobbied Trump throughout 2025 to renew Chevron’s license to operate in Venezuela, which Trump approved after initially opposing. The New York Times has called Chevron’s permission to operate in Venezuela “a unique prize in the American corporate world.”

Now, with Trump’s promise that “oil companies are gonna go in” and “take back” Venezuela’s oil, Chevron stands to benefit from its more established placement in the country.

“Chevron is betting it is in prime position to unlock some of the world’s richest oil reserves,” said the Wall Street Journal, adding that Wirth “has calculated his company has the means and resilience to outlast changing governments.”

“We play a long game,” Wirth said at a recent U.S.-Saudi investment summit.

Roadblocks for the “Donroe Doctrine”

Chevron’s former head of Latin American operations, Ali Moshiri, who now runs an energy investment fund, told the Financial Times he’s raising $2 billion for Venezuelan oil projects.

“I’ve had a dozen calls over the past 24 hours from potential investors,” he said in the days following Maduro’s kidnapping. “Interest in Venezuela has gone from zero to 99 percent.”

But some experts are skeptical of Moshiri’s bullishness, noting that Trump’s desire to take over Venezuela’s oil industry faces major challenges.

Venezuela’s oil fields are in a decayed state because of “mismanagement, lack of investment and sanctions,” according to Reuters, and U.S. oil corporations would have to commit long-term to revitalize and profit from them amid current uncertainty and instability. Moreover, global demand for crude oil is shaky while oil prices are relatively low.

“Any companies seeking to extract more oil from Venezuela must invest tens of billions of dollars in infrastructure repair and replacement,” Klare told Truthout. “This might not be an obstacle if oil prices were high and the major oil companies expect an ever-increasing demand for oil, but neither is true.”

Trump has suggested the U.S. could reimburse oil companies that invest in Venezuela, and one former Trump energy advisor told Politico that U.S. agencies could offer to underwrite investments.

Media reports offer mixed messages from oil companies. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump hinted at Maduro’s ouster to oil executives a month ago, telling them to “get ready,” and Trump confirmed he tipped them off “before and after,” though the Financial Times claims that oil companies were “blindsided” by the action. Companies like ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil have yet to indicate any plans to reenter Venezuela.

Trump has said he expects “the United States would be running Venezuela and extracting oil from its huge reserves for years,” and that “the United States would obtain 30 to 50 million barrels of heavy Venezuelan crude oil,” though he “offered no time period for that process” and “acknowledged it would take years to revive the country’s neglected oil sector,” according to the New York Times.

As of November 2025, Venezuela was exporting 921,000 barrels of oil per day. The U.S. imported 6.48 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2023, according to government data.

Trump and members of his Cabinet are meeting with U.S. oil executives Friday at the White House “to discuss plans for them to enter Venezuela and drill,” reports Politico.

But Klare remains skeptical, saying: “I do not expect a rush by the large U.S. oil companies to undertake major operations in Venezuela, except by Chevron, which is already operating there.”

Oil company CEOs mock Trump behind his back as he begs them for help in Venezuela


January 08, 2026
ALTERNET

Politico reports giant energy companies are worried about President Donald Trump pressuring them to invest resources in Venezuela and are quietly planning to ignore him.

Trump is reportedly now pressing American oil giants to spend “billions of dollars reopening Venezuela,” after he sent troops to arrest Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. However, Politico reported Thursday that the companies with the most resources and experience to drill in the South American nation are on the fence about the project, according to six anonymous oil company executives and industry lobbyists.

According to Politico, Trump is planning a White House meeting Friday that may include executives from companies with experience in Venezuela, including U.S.-based Exxon Mobil, Chevron and ConocoPhillips. But executives tell Politico that the assembly could turn into an arm-twisting session.

“Some of the CEOs fear that Trump will use the meeting — and invite television cameras — to pressure them to make public commitments sooner than they would like,” Politico reports.

Executives want to know who will guarantee their companies’ security and property in a country still run by the same corrupt politicians who stole millions of dollars’ worth of their oil exploration and drilling equipment two decades ago. In addition to who will pay company bills and in what currency, Politico reports there remains the question of how much information the White House is sharing with acting President Delcy Rodriguez’s interim government. Industry insiders are still unsure whether the White House has even told Venezuelan officials that the it has given some companies licenses to sell 50 million barrels of oil that Trump claims the nation was “turning over” to U.S invading forces.

In addition to questions of safety, companies are wondering why they should invest in hard-to-process heavy Venezuelan crude oil given the nation’s busted infrastructure and uncertain political environment, only to dump more oil on a global market and hurt their bottom line with the resulting cheaper oil prices.

With so many reasons not to invest, Politico reports oil executives may simply string Trump along with big promises while delivering nothing.

“Companies may follow the playbook of promising the White House they are interested in investing in Venezuela just to stay on Trump’s good side but ultimately not following through,” one business lobbyist told Politico. This tactic — called “Everyone Makes Promises And Never Actually Does Anything” — is so common for dealing with the distracted president that it’s got its own acronym.

“My impression is it’s EMPANADA all over again,” an anonymous executive told Politico.

Read the Politico report at this link.

Friday, January 09, 2026

Weak US Jobs Report Shows ‘Bleak Economic Reality’ for Workers Under Trump

There has been “almost no hiring since April,” observed one economist.


Job seekers attend a career fair in Harlem hosted by Assemblymember Jordan Wright on December 10, 2025, in New York City.
(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)


Brad Reed
Jan 09, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


The US labor market appears to be running on fumes under President Donald Trump, as the latest jobs report revealed that the American economy added just 50,000 jobs in December, below economists’ consensus estimate of 55,000 jobs.

The report, released on Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), also found that the US economy as a whole created just 584,000 jobs in 2025, which is less than a third of the 2 million jobs created in 2024 during the last year of former President Joe Biden’s term.

The 2025 figure also marked the lowest number of annual jobs created since 2020, when the economy was shut down due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Fox Business anchor Cheryl Casone couldn’t put a happy spin on the jobs report after its release, as she noted that the gains of just 37,000 private-sector jobs on the month were “much weaker than expected.”



Digging further into the report, Bloomberg economic analyst Joe Weisenthal observed on X that manufacturing employment has been hit particularly hard in recent months, despite Trump’s vow that his tariffs would lead to a manufacturing revival in the US.

“It’s not just that total manufacturing employment is shrinking,” he explained. “The number of manufacturing sub-sectors that are adding jobs is rapidly shrinking. Of the 72 different types of manufacturing tracked by the BLS, just 38.2% are still adding jobs. A year ago it was 47.2%.”

Heather Cox Richardson, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the weakness in the labor market extends beyond the manufacturing sector, as there has been “almost no hiring outside of healthcare and hospitality” since the start of Trump’s second term.

Richardson also observed that “there was almost no hiring since April” of last year, when Trump announced his “Liberation Day” tariffs that sent shockwaves through the global economy.

Economist Dean Baker, co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, zeroed in on downward revisions in prior jobs reports, reinforcing that the current labor market is anemic.

“With the revisions, the average for the last three months was a fall of 22,000 [jobs],” Baker explained. “The healthcare and social assistance sector added an average of 49,000 jobs over this period, which means that outside of healthcare the economy lost an average of 71,000 jobs in the last three months.”

Alex Jacquez, chief economist at Groundwork Collaborative, said the jobs report reflected a “lifeless economy,” and he pinned the blame on Trump and his trade policies as a top reason.

“Working families face sluggish wage growth, fewer job opportunities, and never-ending price hikes on groceries, household essentials, and utilities,” said Jacquez. “Despite the president’s endless attempts to deflect and distract from the bleak economic reality, workers and job seekers know their budgets feel tighter than ever thanks to Trump’s disastrous economic mismanagement.”

Economist Elise Gould of the Economic Policy Institute took a look at the jobs numbers and concluded the US labor market now is far weaker than the one Biden left Trump nearly one year ago.


“The slowdown in job growth this year is stark compared to 2024,” Gould wrote on Bluesky. “The average monthly gain was only 49,000 in 2025 compared to 168,000 in 2024. Over the last three months, average job growth was actually negative, meaning there are fewer jobs now than in September.”
Trump Wants $6 Trillion Tax Hike to Fund $600 Billion in New War Spending

It’s good to see an old man suffering from dementia enjoying himself, but there are much cheaper and less deadly ways to entertain such a person.


Fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela’s largest military complex, is seen from a distance after a series of explosions in Caracas on January 3, 2026.
(Photo by AFP via Getty Images)


Dean Baker
Jan 09, 2026
Beat the Press

President Donald Trump is now apparently planning to request a $600 billion increase in annual military spending starting in October, financed by another huge jump in import taxes, aka tariffs. I said “apparently” since it’s not clear that he thinks he has to request authority for this spending increase or massive tax hike from Congress.

Under the Constitution there is no ambiguity on these issues. Congress has the power to tax and authorize spending. However, Donald Trump and the Republican Congress have not shown much respect for the Constitution in Trump’s second term and it’s not clear the Supreme Court has any greater level of respect. So, who knows if there actually will be requests for Congress to vote on, or whether he will just do it with no legal authority.




Majority of Democrats Join Senate GOP to Pass Trump’s $900 Billion Pentagon Wish List


Anyhow, apart from the mechanism employed, this would be a massive increase in spending, coming to just under 2% of GDP. It would also amount to a massive tax increase if Trump actually offsets the spending, as he claimed he would, rather than just increasing the deficit.

Taken over a decade, a $600 billion increase in annual taxes would come to $6 trillion, roughly $45,000 per household. It is real money. It would be difficult, but not impossible, to raise this much money through tariffs.

That doesn’t sound like much of an affordability agenda, but Trump was never really into that word anyhow.

Our imports currently come to just to over $3.2 trillion annually. A straight calculation would imply that an across-the-board tariff increase of 19 percentage points could cover the cost of Trump’s military buildup. But the increase in the tariff rate on most items would end up being considerably higher for two reasons.

First imports would fall sharply in response to a tariff of this size. Let’s say they fall by 15%, this would put imports at $2.7 trillion, which would mean a tariff increase of 22 percentage points would be needed to get to Trump’s $600 billion.

The other reason that the tariff on most items would likely be higher is that Trump will presumably exempt some items other for policy reasons or in response to payoffs at Mar-a-Lago. In the first category, much of what we import are intermediate goods used in manufacturing finished products like cars or planes. High tariffs on these inputs will hurt industries that Trump is ostensibly trying to foster.

The other part of the story is that we have seen many executives make the pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago, most notably Apple CEO Tim Cook, and walk away tariff exemptions on items they import. This trek will be more widely traveled when CEOs are looking at tariffs two or three times their current levels.

That means the import tax on many products will have to increase in the neighborhood of 30 percentage points to hit Trump’s revenue targets. That will be a big hit to many households’ budgets, as we know that the bulk of tariff revenue gets passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. That doesn’t sound like much of an affordability agenda, but Trump was never really into that word anyhow.

The other side of the story is that this massive increase in military spending will mean a huge diversion of resources from productive uses. Scientists who might have been developing better computers or software for civilian uses will instead be working for military contractors. The same is true for researchers developing new drugs or medical equipment.

This will also be the case with millions of less-highly educated or narrowly trained workers. Instead of working as teachers or in various areas of healthcare, such as physical therapists or home healthcare assistants, they will be employed in the sort of jobs needed by military contractors. That’s a huge drain for the economy and corresponds to the reduction in purchasing power as a result of Trump’s massive tax increase.

If there was some clear argument as to why we needed such a massive increase in taxes and diversion of resources, as when we confronted the Nazis in World War II, perhaps this hit to the economy could be justified. But no one made such claims, not even Trump in his 2024 campaign, until Trump invaded Venezuela and decided it was fun.

It’s good to see an old man suffering from dementia enjoying himself, but it would be much cheaper and less deadly if we just gave him a good video game.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


Dean Baker
Dean Baker is the co-founder and the senior economist of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of several books, including "Getting Back to Full Employment: A Better bargain for Working People," "The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive," "The United States Since 1980," "Social Security: The Phony Crisis" (with Mark Weisbrot), and "The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer." He also has a blog, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues.
Full Bio >