Saturday, February 07, 2026

Cyclone Harry’s Mediterranean Massacre: At Least 1,000 Migrants Lost at Sea, Fortress Europe’s Deadly Legacy



 February 6, 2026

Photo by Mika Baumeister

Cyclone Harry tore through the central Mediterranean in mid-January 2026 with a ferocity that shattered records—winds howling at gale force, waves cresting 16 meters, rain falling in sheets across southern Italy, Malta, and Tunisia. On land, the storm flooded homes, created landslides and crippled infrastructure leaving billions of euros worth of devastation in its wake. At sea, it became a slaughter. According to Mediterranea Saving Humans and media reports, at least 27 of 29 boats that left Tunisia’s Sfax region sank during the tempest, with estimates of at least 1,000 migrants feared dead —one of the deadliest single episodes on the central route in recent memory. The Italian coastguard confirmed 380 people unaccounted for from just eight vessels. The UN’s International Organization for Migration warned of hundreds more lost across multiple wrecks over ten days of unrelenting chaos. Some boats also departed from Libya, including a sinking off Tobruk that left at least 51 feared dead.

This is not a tragedy of nature alone. It is a preventable massacre supercharged by Fortress Europe —the EU’s militarized border apparatus that has turned the Mediterranean into the planet’s most lethal migration corridor. More than 30,000 people have died or disappeared here since 2014, according to IOM figures, with 2025 already claiming at least a very conservative estimate of 1,340 lives on the central route before Harry struck. Smugglers exploit extreme weather, knowing European patrols and rescue NGOs are crippled by storms. But the real architects of this graveyard are the policies themselves: pushbacks, criminalization of solidarity, and dirty deals with Tunisia and Libya that externalize border violence to authoritarian regimes. The sea does the rest.

Artwork by Gaia Valmaree Leonardi

Climate change is the accelerant. Rising sea temperatures and intensified storm systems—driven by decades of global emissions—have made the Mediterranean more violent and unpredictable. Cyclone Harry was not an anomaly; it was a preview. Stronger storms, higher waves, and more frequent extremes will multiply the mortal risks for those already forced to flee drought, desertification, war, and poverty from sub-Saharan Africa to the Middle East. Yet Europe, the historic epicenter of industrial emissions, answers climate displacement not with safe pathways or climate justice but with ever-higher walls, Frontex drones, and detention camps.

Frontex, the European Union’s border and coast guard agency, stands as the continent’s equivalent to ICE—a militarized, unaccountable apparatus designed to externalize and enforce Fortress Europe’s deadly logic. With a budget now exceeding €1 billion annually and a growing fleet of drones, patrol boats, and surveillance technology, Frontex has shifted from rescue coordination to active pushback operations, intercepting migrant boats in international waters and forcing them back to Libya or Tunisia—countries where torture, enslavement, and extortion await returnees. The agency’s role in Cyclone Harry’s catastrophe is damning: while distress signals flooded in via Inmarsat and satellite phones, Frontex assets were either absent, delayed, or focused on deterrence rather than rescue, leaving hundreds to drown in the storm’s grip. Like ICE, Frontex operates with near-total impunity—its officers shielded from accountability, its failures blamed on “weather conditions” or “smuggler recklessness,” and its violence outsourced to third countries through deals that pay dictators to do the dirty work. In the Mediterranean’s deadliest corridor, Frontex does not save lives; it polices borders at the cost of thousands, turning Europe’s southern sea into a mass grave where the EU’s “values” are drowned alongside the people who seek refuge.

Italy under Giorgia Meloni carries a special burden of shame. Her government has gutted NGO rescue missions, criminalized sea solidarity, and boasted of “closed ports.” As Harry raged, Italy’s Maritime Rescue Coordination Center received distress signals via Inmarsat but failed to mount timely or sufficient searches. Mediterranea Saving Humans accused authorities of a “lack of information and rescue efforts,” while survivors from Tunisia and Libya described dozens of “floating mass graves” vanishing without trace.

Italy’s complicity, as the central entry point into the EU, extends beyond the silence at sea to its active role in the EU’s externalized detention regime. In November 2023, Giorgia Meloni signed a controversial agreement with Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama to establish Italian-run migrant detention centers on Albanian soil—one in Gjader for identification and asylum processing, the other in a former military base as an entry screening center into the Shengjin region for repatriation or asylum. The facilities, designed to hold up to 3,000 people at a time, were touted as a “European model” to offload Italy’s border burden. Over the course of a year, the facilities are expected to process up to 36,000 people. Yet as of February 2026, the centers remain empty and non-operational—plagued by legal challenges, human rights concerns, and logistical failures. Italian courts, NGOs, and the European Court of Human Rights have raised alarms over potential violations of the prohibition of forced return, inhumane conditions, and the outsourcing of asylum obligations to a non-EU country with a documented record of weak rule of law. The empty buildings stand as a stark symbol: Meloni’s government is willing to spend millions on a detention archipelago abroad while refusing to open safe, legal pathways or end the deadly pushbacks that claim thousands of lives each year.

The human toll is unbearable: women, children, entire families swallowed by waves in the name of European border control. Harry’s catastrophe lays bare Fortress Europe’s murderous arithmetic: criminalize rescue, externalize borders, ignore climate displacement—and let the sea finish the work of exclusion.

The demand is urgent and non-negotiable: end the criminalization of migration. Abolish pushbacks and dismantle Frontex. Open safe, legal routes for climate and conflict refugees. Confront climate change with justice, not militarized frontiers. Tear down Fortress Europe before it claims another thousand lives.

Michael Leonardi lives in Italy and can be reached at michaeleleonardi@gmail.com





THE GRIFT


Trump Get Spectacularly Richer, While Putting the Country on a Path to Poverty




February 6, 2026

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

Contrary to what many people may believe, Donald Trump is not a very impressive businessman. Not only has he had six businesses that went bankrupt, several of his other ventures failed and faded away. The now defunct Trump University was sued for defrauding students, and Trump settled for $25 million. The Trump Ice bottled water generally can’t be found alongside other bottled waters in stores. Although lobbyists and foreign governments funneled money into the Trump International Hotel during the first Trump presidency, the hotel still lost an estimated $74 million and was sold. This is far from a complete list of Trump’s failed ventures.

Donald Trump has been wealthy all of his life largely because he received $413 million from his father. The New York Times reports, “Much of this money came to Mr. Trump because he helped his parents dodge taxes.” It is much easier to make additional millions if one already has hundreds of millions. As scholars have observed, wealth begets more wealth.

Donald Trump’s real talent is his ability to get people to believe things that are not true. One of his biggest successes in this area is the idea that he is a tremendously successful businessman. Because Trump has gotten people to associate his name with luxury and success, he has been able to make millions licensing his name. Businesspeople pay Trump to put the Trump name on their ventures. This creates a feedback loop where these businesses that are not owned and managed by Trump give the public the impression that Trump owns more businesses than he actually does. It feeds into the image of him as a successful businessman.

Trump convinced many Americans that he would apply his supposed skill in business to address the problems facing the country. But as with many of his actual businesses, we may end up with a bankrupt country instead.

Trump’s Most Financially Successful Venture: The Second Trump Administration

Trump is using his power as president to bully, extort, and receive financial favors from companies and countries. For example, Trump has sued companies that depend on the government for contracts and mergers or that simply want to avoid a battle with the Trump administration. So far, Trump has made $90 million from these suits. Justin Sun was under federal investigation. He invested $75 million in Trump’s World Liberty Financial company. Then the federal government paused its investigation. The United Arab Emirates pledged to invest $2 billion in World Liberty Financial. The UAE is now able to purchase advanced artificial intelligence computer chips from the United States. There are many more examples.

There are different estimates of how many billions Trump has made off the presidency. Trump is not transparent about his business deals. He has multiple ventures and partnerships, and it is not always clear how much of the wealth from his joint ventures should be allocated to Trump. And his wealth is now constantly growing. All of this makes it hard to calculate exactly how much Trump has profited off the presidency.

In September of 2025, Forbes observed that Trump “just had the most lucrative year of his life.” It estimated that Trump made $3 billion from 2024 to September 2025. This amount would increase Trump’s net worth from $4.3 billion to $7.3 billion. In other words, Trump’s net worth increased by 70 percent by September 2025.

In January 2026, New Yorker reporter David D. Kirkpatrick estimated that Trump’s profits from the presidency had reached $4 billion. Based on the Forbes number for 2024, this would mean that Trump has basically doubled his net worth in about a year.

While 2025 was extremely profitable to Trump, 2026 is likely to be even more so. Trump has started the year with a $10 billion suit against the IRS and Treasury Department for failing to prevent the leaking of his tax information. If President Trump directs the IRS and Treasury Department to pay him $10 billion then he would have more than doubled his net worth again.

Fred Wertheimer, the president of the anti-corruption watchdog group Democracy 21, has worked on this issue for several decades. While most presidents profit personally in some way from the presidency, Wertheimer has never seen an American president profit personally on the scale that Donald Trump is. For Wertheimer, the president most similar to Trump is Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Trump Puts America on a Path to Poverty

Trump is attacking the long-term health and strength of the US economy in several ways. His erratic tariffs are making it harder and more expensive for businesses to function. Although immigrants are important contributors to the US economy, his administration is virulently anti-immigrant. There are too many ways that Trump is harming the US economy in the long-term to address them all here, but I will briefly highlight three that might not come to mind when one thinks of the economic impact of Trump’s policies.

Trump’s climate-change-denial and pro-fossil-fuel policies are hurting the planet, the health of the American people, and the US economy. The Congressional Budget Office concluded that the harms of climate change in the United States will include an increase in mortality rates and hundreds of billions of dollars in flood damage — yet Trump continues with his denials. Trump’s pro-coal stance is among his most nonsensical. Coal is the dirtiest of the fossil fuels, emitting a variety of harmful chemicals. Particulates from coal cause hundreds of thousands of deaths. And, as the conservative Washington Post editorial board stated, “Requiring aging [coal power] plants to operate after their scheduled closures hurts consumers, who pay the price.” But this is, in fact, what the Trump administration is requiring.

Electric vehicles are an important tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Trump’s anti-electric vehicle policies are helping China to increase its global dominance of the growing EV market and weakening the global competitiveness of the US auto industry. (Many of Trump’s policies are helping to “Make China great again.”) Although the harms of climate change and fossil fuels are clear, Trump is pursuing a policy agenda to accelerate and exacerbate the damage.

Science and technology have been critical to US economic development and growth. Many of the wealthiest US companies are technology companies. Many of the highest paying occupations are in scientific and technological fields. But the Trump administration is anti-science. The denial of climate change and the rejection of the findings of vaccine research are two prominent examples of this anti-science stance. Jennifer Duchon, a pediatric infectious disease specialist, described the latest vaccine recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as “an unmitigated disaster” and “grossly irresponsible.”

Although Donald Trump dined with the anti-Semites Nick Fuentes and Ye (Kanye West), has an administration with anti-Semites in prominent positions, and leads a MAGA movement that is increasing openly anti-Semitic and racist, the administration used the cover of going after anti-Semitism to attack the nation’s leading scientific research universities. These universities have lost research funding, have had to pay fines, and have had reductions in the number of foreign students.

About 25,000 scientists have been cut from government agencies. Joel Wilkins of Futurism concluded that the administration’s actions have resulted in a “colossal exodus of specialized expertise from institutions important to public health, environmental protection, and scientific research” and that “[t]he effects are likely to be catastrophic — and the reverberations could be felt for decades.”

Sudip Parikh, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, stated,

Over the last 80 years, we have built the greatest innovation engine that the world’s ever seen and it’s delivered cures and treatments for disease. It has delivered economic growth and jobs.

But now Trump is destroying that innovation engine — and the rest of the world is benefitting. France, the Netherlands, Denmark, Spain, Australia, Norway and other countries are now actively recruiting US scientists. Given that there has been a jump in the number of US scientists looking for jobs overseas, these countries are likely to be successful in capturing US talent.

Rather than try to unify the country, Trump has worked to deepen divisions and intensify conflict. He has called Democrats “the enemy from within.” His administration tries to punish blue states. (Trump is bipartisan in that he will also go after Republican politicians who dare to oppose him, but most Republicans have toed the Trump line.) Blue states are economically connected to red states and to the federal government. If Trump succeeds in harming blue states, he weakens all of America.

It is difficult for a country to address problems when there is so much internal conflict. In a hyper-partisan environment, policies that are needed are viewed through a partisan lens rather than with an eye toward what’s best for the country. Division makes governing more difficult. A dysfunctional political system likely leads to a less responsive and more inefficient economic system.

Much more could be said about Trump’s anti-climate-change, anti-science, and pro-division policies. Additionally, there are many more risks that the Trump administration poses to the long-term economic health of the country. Among the potential sources of harm are Trump’s desire to control the Federal Reserve, underfunding and understaffing of the federal government, his deregulatory agenda, his failure to address rising healthcare costs, disastrous foreign policy, and his approach to artificial intelligence. This is not a complete list.

Trump may not be very good as a businessman, but he seems to be pretty good at creating bankruptcies and failed ventures. The United States may be the next victim of his reverse Midas touch.

This first appeared on CEPR.

Algernon Austin, a senior research fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, has conducted research and writing on issues of race and racial inequality for over 20 years. His primary focus has been on the intersection of race and the economy.