Showing posts sorted by date for query ISHMAEL REED. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ISHMAEL REED. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, December 19, 2025

The Yellow Baldwin: William Gee Wong

Ishmael Reed
December 19, 2025


Ishmael Reed presenting William Gee Wong with the American Book Award for memoir. Photo: Tennessee Reed.

Reading William Gee Wong’s Sons of Chinatown: A Memoir Rooted in China and America (Temple University Press, 2024), one realizes how valuable the former Oakland Tribune publishers Robert and Nancy Maynard were to the Oakland community. However, the stress that accompanied their being overachievers killed them—the Jackie Robinson curse. Maynard, who’d worked at The Washington Post, had become the first Black publisher of a major metropolitan newspaper. One of those who thrived there was William Gee Wong. The newspaper received a Pulitzer Prize, and Wong got a spot on The McNeil-Lehrer Report, a plum for a minority journalist. While dwelling in the heights of journalism, Wong learned the different treatment accorded to white and minority journalists.

Plagiarist Mike Barnicle still has a job, a white male journalist who was suspended by The New York Times for sexual harassment, and Glenn Thrush still has a job at The Times. CNN commentator Jeffrey Toobin, who exposed himself to women on The New Yorker’s staff, a criminal offense, was also suspended. Briefly. He’s the one who said that the Black jury acquitted O.J. Simpson because Blacks can’t think rationally and “shouldn’t be patted on the head.” The jury wasn’t all Black, and the criminal’s gloves never did fit. Toobin still has a job at CNN. In late December 2017, Amber Athey reported about MSNBC’s Chris Matthews as having had a track record of sexual harassment toward female colleagues and guests, including one woman being given “a separation-related payment.” He retired, temporarily,but he’s back now.

Wong’s heady media moment came to an end when one of the good old boys of the kind who still control the media, the late C. David Burgin, became the newspaper’s editor after Robert Maynard’s death. Wong’s and Black journalist Brenda Payton’s roles were limited by the new owner, Burgin, who regularly insulted Maynard’s reign at the Tribune. Payton stayed on for a while, but Wong was fired. He was escorted from the building by a bouncer. So was Barbara Reynolds, who had a column at USA Today. She had a heart attack the night of her ouster.

With the current purge of minority journalists in the name of Woke and DEI, the Burgin types are in complete control of the mainstream media. Mainstream publications like The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times have capitulated to Trump, and a pro-Trump family, the Ellisons, is about to buy Warner Bros., Netflix, and other media. Trump wants to control CNN through Ellison.

A media that lacks diversity attracts white readers by offering the usual stereotypes of communities that don’t have the media power to fight back. Though the corporate media believes its owners’ values are superior to those of social media platforms, social media offers a more multidimensional view of the communities we live in.

Fortunately, we still have ancient means to tell our stories: documentaries, theater, and books. Wong has chosen to write a book.

And so, deprived of the kind of space accorded to plagiarists like Barnicle, William Gee Wong has written Sons of Chinatown, and though this book is an account of Wong’s personal journey as a Chinese American and a husband with a biracial son, his story intersects with our stories. As Leonard Peltier says, the purpose of our faux Eurocentric education was to take the Indian out of the Indian. The purpose was also to take the Chinese out of the Chinese, the Hispanic out of the Hispanic, the Irish out of the Irish, and the Italian out of the Italian.

When Gay Talese, who bragged about marrying into the Anglo mainstream and denied the existence of Italian American literature, he was countered by Helen Barolini, author of The Dream Book, which documented a history of Italian American writing in the United States.

 


Wong felt this “weird insider-outsider phenomenon and ultimately came away knowing that I am an American by nationality and this indefinable cultural mix of Chinatown and American. Yet at the same time, I wasn’t sure—and in some ways, still am not—whether my broad cohort (Chinese Americans and Asian Americans), and I truly belong here in America or in our ancestral lands—or in truth, neither place, as though we are in a yellow purgatory. It is indeed an underlying weird feeling of belonging and yet not belonging.” All of us who have commuted between the worlds of our forefathers and mothers and the Anglo world have felt that way.

Wong found himself out of place in China, the country of his ancestors’ origin. Similarly, when Africans began visiting Africa in the 1960s, they discovered that the Africans considered them to be white. Wong feels uneasy about the hi-tech Chinese immigrants who speak Mandarin and look down upon the traditional Chinese Americans who speak Cantonese, who are slighted in the film “Crazy Rich Asians.” Without this book, most of us would have missed this slight just as I would have missed how Asian groups are pitted against each other in the Bruce Lee films if novelist Shawn Wong hadn’t alerted me. Traditional Black Americans complain about their treatment by African immigrants, especially the Nigerians, the most educated among immigrants. Joy Reid says her Guyanese mother and Congolese father made disparaging remarks about Black Americans. Blacks are also beset by high-tech Indian types who are even more eager to pick fights with Blacks to please white nationalists. They wouldn’t be the first immigrants to audition for white acceptance by craping on Blacks.

Vivek Ramaswamy,when a Republican presidential candidate, expressed sympathy for a White man who killed three Black people at a Jacksonville, Florida, Dollar General store. He didn’t think a mistaken belief in White supremacy was to blame, since he doesn’t think it exists, even though the killer had written a manifesto and had a swastika on his AR-15. Another Indian American who sought to gain the spotlight by kowtowing to white prejudices was Rina Shah, who justified Trump’s National Guard occupation of Washington, D.C., because of Black dysfunctional households. By doing so, she neglected dysfunction in her own community, including South Asian domestic violence, from a study: South Asian Women at Greater Risk for Injury From Intimate Partner Violence by Anita Raj, and Jay G Silverman.

“Intimate partner violence and intimate partner violence–related homicide disproportionately affect immigrant women.1–6 South Asian women residing in the United States appear to be at particularly high risk for intimate partner violence, with 40% reporting intimate partner violence in their current relationship in a recent study.” Ain’t no money or attention in Ms Raj.examining dysfunction in her community?

What Shah and Ramaswamy have in common with minority writers is that we are told that to be successful, we must attract a white audience because only whites buy cultural products. I’m sure that President Obama scolded Blacks with stern love lectures to convince white voters that he wouldn’t be a Black nationalist president. Wong writes about some deranged Black people who answered President Trump’s “Chinese Virus” smear by attacking Asian American citizens. Yes, like members of other ethnic groups, Blacks can be stupid. But an Asian American drug gang that sought to take over our neighborhood was repelled by a Black felon who’d been released from Pelican Bay. The police were of no help. In fact, at the Crime Council meetings where we met with the police, elderly Black residents wondered why the police were so chummy with drug dealers. Whites commit most of the violence against Asian Americans. Still, the media low-balls their participation because they don’t want to risk embarrassing those whom their advertisers see as their best customers. Don Lemon told me that at CNN, he was told to lighten up on Trump voters because MAGAs buy products too.

Wong writes: “Did my racial identity and/or my frequent writing about Chinese America and Asian America help or hurt my career? That question is knotty, convoluted, and difficult to grasp logically and rationally. I don’t really know. What I do know is that I have absolutely no regrets that I spent part of my journalism life writing about an aspect of American life—Yellow America—that few, if any, other mainstream journalists bothered to examine at the time I was doing it.” While many mediocre white journalists dominate the opinion industry highly qualified journalists William Gee Wong and Emil Guillermo were losttheir positions as commentators by PBS and NPR. (NPR fired me for my commentary about how the Willie Horton campaign would backfire on President Bush and Lee Atwater.)

Both Wong and Guillermo ascended to the heights of American journalism only to be cut down. But without their sacrifice and those of others, there would not have been a Yellow Renaissance in literature, because when members of the younger generation saw them use writing as an expression, they began writing themselves. Despite the setbacks Wong has encountered,he is still hopeful.

Wong writes: “America is no longer a place where only straight white Christian men are all-powerful and preeminent. Make no mistake: Many still are, but an increasing number of ‘others’ are making their marks, too—yes, including some of us yellow people. America’s challenge now and into the foreseeable future is to find ways to fit its many disparate identities into a more cohesive whole (i.e., a More Perfect Union).”

Like Baldwin, Wong writes about a corner of the American experience that exists in the shadows and about which Baldwin’s “Chorus of Innocents” is ignorant. William Gee Wong does the same with Sons of Chinatown, with equal eloquence. He is the Yellow Baldwin.

Reed’s latest play is “The Amanuensis.”

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Calling Kamala Harris a Whore Won the Election for Trump



 June 20, 2025

Photograph Source: Nathaniel St. Clair

I don’t know which is worse. The former Vice President’s defeat or the commentary that’s followed, monopolized by men of similar backgrounds.

Did German liberals appease the 3rd Reich as upscale liberals in our country are appeasing this American 4th Reich? Why do I call it the 4th Reich?

Members of the Trump administration, like Musk and Bannon, enjoy hoisting Nazi salutes, and Vice President Vance, on a trip to Germany, embraced the AfD, considered by some to be a Neo-Nazi party. He told German politicians they should “abandon their policy of maintaining a ‘firewall against the far right,’ a statement which received “murmurs from the audience and a backlash from German officials,” according to Jewish Chronicle, Feb.16, 2025.

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof is the epitome of soppy upscale liberalism; he says Democrats shouldn’t talk down to the (white) working class, a charge against the Democrats that has been endlessly repeated. This line ignores the former president’s commitment to unions and that the former Vice President received the majority of votes from union households.

Kristof says that Democrats shouldn’t call Trump supporters racists and bigots. Millions of them are racists and bigots, and if they had succeeded in overthrowing the government on January 6th,, given the MAGA hostility towards The Times, he might find himself in an El Salvador prison where there ain’t no two hour five-star Manhattan lunches.

Like other Timesmen who believe that San Francisco is a scene from “The Last of Us,” he couldn’t resist taking a dump on San Francisco, defining the entire city by focusing on one section,which is how the president and his media buddies are defining Los Angeles. East Coast columnists know as much about San Francisco as we know about the ocean buried beneath the ice of Enceladus.

Kristof made his statement on May 28. On the same day, Robert Reich also attributed the former Vice President’s loss to economic discontent.

A serious study disposes of this theory. In January, political sociologist David N. Smith and his University of Kansas colleague, Associate Sociology Professor Eric A. Hanley, published a 47-page paper deconstructing the Republican president’s appeal. They write that “75% of Trump’s voters supported him enthusiastically, mainly because they shared his prejudices, not because they were hurting economically.” Sharing his prejudices means an intense paranoia about a DEI takeover led by Blacks, who are seen by the right as the group that puts other groups up to mischief.

It was left up to El Pais, a Spanish newspaper, to print my assessment of the election, where I wrote that the Vice President lost the election because of Racism and Misogyny. Trump got the locker room vote by defining the former Vice President in antebellum-old South terms as a promiscuous slave wench. It was his vile assertion that Kamela Harris achieved her status not by hard work but by using sex. He retweeted a post that the Vice President rose to power by giving blow jobs, which must have sent guffaws throughout the locker room. With this strategy, he got the locker room vote.

The present Vice President embellished Trump’s slander of the former Vice President when Vance referred to the then-Vice President as “trash.” Millions of white men believe that minority women are sluts who are available to them. That’s why Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund, believed that Nafissatou Diallo, a 33-year-old former housekeeper at the upmarket Sofitel hotel in Manhattan, was available to him for sexual assault. The good old boy Media of Manhattan took his side. They called her a whore. Strauss-Kahn, however, settled with Diallo for an undisclosed amount of money. Trump got the locker room, a locker room that holds millions of men. He reached back to the old antebellum South image of the Black woman as a promiscuous slave wench, the kind of lurid image of Black women one finds in the books of pro-slavery writers Thomas Nelson Page (In Ole Virginia) and Thomas Dixon (The Klansman) who represent the most shameful period in American literature.

Did Trump’s final argument during the campaign focus on economics? The price of eggs? No, as The Washington Post noted on October 29, 2024, “Donald Trump’s closing argument: Vulgarity” during a rally.

 “Businessman Grant Cardone likened Vice President Kamala Harris to a prostitute. ‘Her and her pimp handlers will destroy our country,’ he said. “David Rem, billed as a childhood friend of Mr. Trump’s, called Ms. Harris the ‘‘Antichrist’ and ‘devil’ while waving a cross onstage. Elon Musk, who also spoke at Sunday’s rally, (in October 2024) posted on X, referred to Ms. Harris as the c-word. He opened a rally this month in Latrobe, Pennsylvania. Ms. Harris has been a “sh*t” vice president, and everything she touches turns to “sh*t.”

The Associated Press, October 27, 2025, reported that Trump called Democratic Vice-President Kamala Harris “the devil” and “likened the former California attorney general vying to become the first woman and Black woman president to a prostitute.”

A group called the “Speaking with American Men” project received twenty million dollars to study why young men didn’t vote for Kamala. I could have told Democrats for free why Kamala Harris lost.

The commentators didn’t recognize this ante bellum connection because they were educated to be copycat Anglos and have little knowledge of American history. Even TV’s official historians make omissions and mistakes.

The commentators continue to note that some Black and Latino men have abandoned the Democrats. Maybe Black and Hispanic men recoil at the thought of a woman president? Especially a woman of Indo-Black heritage with a Jewish husband, fodder for conspiracy theories.

Whites explained the alienation of Latino men from Democrats in economic terms. Victor Martinez, a Latino broadcaster and not one of the green room vagrants who are disproportionately white, said his Latino callers were opposed to a woman running things; the majority of Latina and Black women voted for Harris—Hispanic whisperer David M. Drucker failed to mention their vote when, appearing on “Morning Joe” on June 9, 2025, he explained why the Hispanic vote is trending right. Of course, some might have regrets. Some Cuban and Venezuelan Trump supporters have been threatened with deportation.

Sixteen rappers endorsed Trump as a nod to a fellow felon, including Curtis 50 Cents Jackson, who fronts for Starz network—a network which specializes in sleazy Black pathology dramas. Snoop Dogg performed at his inaugural. In an attempt to moderate the feud between Trump and Musk, Kanye West said he loved both of them.

Given that millions in Africa and the United States will die as a result of Trump’s policies, and Black and Brown women who will suffer the most from his abortion bans, the possible curtailment of Medicare and Social Security, the rappers’ endorsement of Trump has to be regarded as the biggest blunder in Black history. The headline of a story that appeared on the front page of The Times on June 19, 2025, read “Trump’s Cuts to South Africa Threaten Global Medical Progress.” On the editorial page was the statement: “Global malnutrition risks getting worse because of Trump’s cuts in humanitarian aid.”

In my interview with Don Lemon for Tar Baby magazine, for which I am editor-in-chief, he discounted the influence of rappers. I disagree. These rappers have millions of followers.

How did white women react to these lewd lowlife attacks against their sister? The majority voted for Trump for the third time. Maybe they admire Trump’s antebellum style. In the old South, White men ruled women and minorities. Perhaps they suffer from the political version of the Stockholm Syndrome.

There’s a scene in James Fenimore Cooper’s The Last of the Mohicans where a Native American voices his objection to a white settler as a lookout for an encampment because he might misinterpret some signals. He might confuse the noise of the enemy with that of an animal.

This is the problem with an American commentariat that lacks diversity. There are signs that they miss.

Progressives had issues with Kamala Harris, mostly having to do with her stance on the genocide in Gaza. Like Hubert Humphrey, who lost to Richard Nixon because he could not stray from President Johnson’s position on Vietnam, she was compromised because of her loyalty to President Biden. (Forgotten is a statement attributed to Humphrey, when discussing poor living conditions in urban ghettos. Humphrey stated: “I’ve got enough spark in me to lead a mighty good revolt under those conditions….”)  But even with her equivocating about Gaza, where daily war crimes are committed, progressives should have expressed more outrage about the nasty treatment of this woman by white men like Trump and Vance, who view all Black women as “trash,” loose and available.

In October, Ishmael Reed’s play “Life Among the Aryans” which predicted the Insurrection, will have a repeat performance at the Black Rep. Group.


BEFORE ILLUMINATUS THERE WAS MUMBO JUMBO

LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for ISHMAEL REED

LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for MUMBO JUMBO


Sunday, May 18, 2025

The Highwayman Accosts Us; Prepare Yourself to Meet Him



May 16, 2025
Facebook

“The reason why the highwayman masters the traveler is not his pistol, but his personality.  If the party attacked really had the superiority in character and love, he could really conquer without arms.  But he must be so charged and surcharged with love that he is as good a highwayman as the highwayman.  You shall not match the pirate with a goody, but with a pirate (i.e., in natural force), and more determined and absolute by dint of his heart than by help of his arms.”

–Ralph W. Emerson, Journals, 1850

“[Of an American feminist academic, a character in the novel] Her followers loved her for her bitterness, and even if she wanted to let joy in, she couldn’t because she would lose the applause.  And anyway it would have to be joy as resistance.  Or joy as a subversive anti-patriarchy project.  Never just joy.  As joy.”

–Chimimanda Ngosie Adichie, Dream Count

“It wasn’t even that they (“American liberals”) felt offended; it was that offended was the only thing they felt.

–Ibid.

As the Trumpian peril mounts it is beginning to be clearer to me just what is the purpose this small band of friends who make up a tiny non-profit space for arts in Utica – offshoot of the Cafe that no longer exists –  serve here in this community.  Throughout the 17 years of The Other Side’s existence, during the everlasting “purple haze” of blue v red neoliberal politics, I’ve struggled to name what we are in words that would distinguish us from similar organizations while avoding getting us labeled as commies.   But what I truly wanted was to identify the non-profit in a way that suggested its transgressive nature, art as disobedience to the chains binding imagination in the neoliberal totality,  as anarchist,  anarchism being the “pirate” that is match – by dint of heart, not might – for the pirate that is neoliberalism.

The impediment to such an about face, to being “as good a highwayman as the highwayman,”  is imaginations so reduced in liberal reality that most people, most of the time, can’t escape the simplifications of polarized thinking and distinctions that keep us acting from fear instead of from “character and love:”  i.e., better avoid sounding too radical or we’ll lose our support.   “Real” or “imaginary,” bad or good, loser or winner, poor or not-poor, red or blue,  etc. – all of these oppositions, including those of religion,  keep imagination immobilized.

The very real threat of Trump’s “vision” for America,  presents us at last with the recognizable armed highwayman who has stopped us in our tracks.   As anti-Trump rallies proliferate, I see emerging a different identity for idealisticorganizations in forgotten places such as Utica.  No question that Trumpian fascism must be opposed.  But is it not now time to be the difference, instead of obediently playing our part on the “Blue side,” that is not different enough to assert itself against rising fascism?  That is, fascism means lynchings, Ku Klux Klan rallies, deportations  and concentration camps, terrible deeds no liberal could ever conjure up.  But what does the liberal conjure beyond No to the actions of the wealthy and powerful right-wingers – what, that is,  of equal decisiveness – even ruthlessness –  in the service of a definite goal?  Were not the wealthy and powerful liberals highwaymen – if you look at all the consequences of free markets, of ceaseless wars and bombings, of inaction on climate change – which we’ve grown accustomed to considering tolerable?  Different for those who want to see a difference, but alike in abandoning the common good as the good that must be served first.

Belief, on both sides, is defensive; neither is “charged and sur-charged with love.” The interior “wall” erected egoistically against knowing the darkness in the soul keeps both sides acting from aggrievement and offendedness.  In the liberal case, the wall keeps us this side of full idealism, ever short of full Big Dream-energized will such that every action is taken in and strengthened by conscious relation to it, as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. engaged “soul force” in the struggles of black and poor people for social justice.

Back in the 1850’s Emerson urged Americans to be “self reliant,” by which he meant to  look not outside ourselves for legitimation, but to “believe your own thought, believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men.”  Despite his being read by nearly every school kid, very few in the more than a century-and-a-half since have followed his prophetic guidance.  Rather we adapt, few among us achieving trust in what he told us to trust (“thyself”). We participate in the diminishment of our very souls, passing on the diminishment generationally. We shrink souls to fit the American success model, normalizing neuroses, depression, addictions, etc.  Because of the soul’s very wildness it must be kept domesticated, or  colonized.  Politically, this makes us fit to be Party faithful, but not conscience faithful. And now we are shocked that there is nothing to stop the highwayman, the courts cannot stop an illegal deportation, fascism is unopposed.  We’re shocked that billionaires are openly running the government, as if moneyed interests had not been the major driving force in America’s development since its earliest times.

How this devotion to profits over goodness manages to remain a secret has to do with the other secret, racism, with which it is interwoven from pre-revolutionary days.  A recent Counterpunch piece, “We Continue to Haunt Hamilton,” by the poet and novelist Ishmael Reed, about the play he wrote and  produced off-off Broadway in answer to the hit Broadway musical, Hamilton!  reminds us of the darker truth.  Founding Father Alexander Hamilton’s story has more damning content than was brought out in Lin-Manuel Miranda’s play.  Hamilton was pro-abolition on record, but in actual practice, he was a slaveowner and seller of human beings. In response to the evidence that came out supporting Reed’s more complicated picture, Miranda excused himself for having left out such qualifying details, (which of course, if included, would have meant, no hit musical!)

Another voice, more modern than Emerson, that urged more strenuous, inclusive consciousness, not only to alleviate personal mental suffering, but to come to grips with social evil, was that of archetypal psychologist C. G. Jung. Nazi evil, he pointed out, was consequence of the unexamined shadow existing in the human Unconscious, both personal and collective.   And, more accessible than Jung’s work, and perhaps even more persuasive in urging confrontation with personal and collective shadow,  are the writings of former slaves, and colonized peoples, voices speaking from the social shadows such as the epigraphs above that were sent to me by a friend. (I have not read any books by this Nigerian author.  Googling her, I discovered she is globally famous; colleges appear to be scrambling to give her her next honorary degree.  Such perceptive voices ought to be heard, but at the same time, you will not make right your  business with “thine own” soul by hearing truth from these others.)

One way to counter neofascism is to see that our white middle class children are given the social advantage of attending multicultural urban schools! But deeper change is needed if our hearts, blinded after centuries of soul subordination, are to regain their sight.  We fault our congresspeople for being spineless, but our spines are squishy from the absence of a moral ultimacy demanding “character and love.”  Without obedience to the more inclusive reality, our “disobedience” can be little more than sibling squabbling.  I believe strongly that if liberalism is to move out from unworthy and ineffective tactics such as “cancel culture” and social bullying,  with “offendedness” the lead emotion, it can do so only if individuals will move to the soul ground pointed to by Emerson.

+++

At the  most recent board meeting of The Other Side, the issue was raised, as it has been more than once, of providing insurance for artists exhibiting in our gallery. Apparently some artists have declined to exhibit with us because of this “insecurity.”   Mind you,  due to its being multi-use, and without paid staff, our gallery cannot be guaranteed “safe” or “secure,” but in over 17 years has never suffered a theft or act of vandalism.  Suddenly, listening to this conversation getting replayed, I found myself saying “Art is not safe!” spontaneously.  It felt so good speaking the words, that I repeated them. Where did they come from? Since ordinarily I am not spontaneous with spoken words,  I conclude they came from my soul.  Although nobody spoke to my point, it seemed to answer something for them, too.   People nodded, and we went on to the next item on the agenda.

Undoubtedly there are people who speak their soul’s truth more readily than I. Some kind of crooked passageway exists between my heart and my spoken voice. For people like me, it can be life-changing to realize a relationship can be made to the knowledge in one’s soul,  built sediment-like over the inconceivable expanse of human history, unobtainable by ordinary consciousness.  I’ve found we can learn the soul’s needs. They must have creative expression of some kind.  But moreover,  they want to feel joy, overflowing gratitude, and they persist in this purpose despite all one’s hedging and dodging.  The joy is in the escape (transcendence) from habitual dualism, from the trap of offendedness and aggrievement that keeps us in red v blue purple haze, in perpetual standoff with “the enemy.” Not safety, precisely, but joy is relief from defensiveness and need for security.

Safety – security –  is not something the world – or even God – can offer, but humans need something that can take it’s place; transcendence is available to every person by means of art.  Art is not the only means to make contact with the soul – there are hallucinogens, there is psychotherapy. Having been discounted for so many millennia, outside of indigenous cultures and a scattering of poets, prophets, mystics and artists across the ages, the soul now manifests as “mental illness.” For many people self-reliance will call for assistance from the modern soul doctor – the psychotherapist.  Ultimately, however, the contact must be personal; can only come from the individual’s assent to take what the soul tells her as her truth, and trusting in her own subjectivity,  find her purpose and her destiny.

Woe to me if I make this sound like for me, it’s a “done deal.”  I write, always, to be the voice I need to hear to keep myself in “self-trust.” But as a matter of fact, so did Emerson, without ever explicitly acknowledging it was the art of writing itself that was the medium for self-reliance.  

+++

As a writer, in order to talk about the red-blue purple haze that smothers liberals’ capacity to confront the highwayman, I rely heavily on the two terms: liberals or liberalism,  and whiteness. I do this in the interest of bringing people “not to me, but to themselves.” (Emerson)   Most white liberals I know take these aspects of identity for granted.  That is ourcontribution to the haze.  Not that we can’t see the limitations of liberal politics (voting the lesser evil, etc.) and not that we do not grasp the genocidal, colonialist, brutal part of our history, and desire to rid our nation of white supremacy, but we do not see how secular liberalism works, how it imposes sanctions upon the heart’s imagination.  Thus, with hearts so blinded, we’re no match for the highwayman when he stops us with his superior arms.

The third term I use,  a little archaic and abstract for most people, but as a way of talking about liberal distrust of imagination, is soullessness. For me, it’s no abstraction!  Invisible yes, abstract, no!  American soullessness is not just about the society built upon consumerism, though it is that.  It’s not even only about lack of depth of feeling, the way it is talked about in normal discourse.  America’s soullessness is based in hostility to and fear of the real-existing soul, for it terrifies us.  In a couple of journal entries about night dreams, Emerson reveals his knowledge of this terror.  He wrote: “Our life is so safe and regular (this was the 19th century in white Concord!) that we hardly know the emotion of terror… And yet dreams acquaint us with what the day omits. [Making ready for your night’s sleep], lie on your back, and you may, in the course of an hour or two, have this neglected part of your education…supplied.  (He tells his dream, which terrified him)  “After I woke and recalled the impressions, my brain tingled with repeated vibrations of terror; and yet was the sensation pleasurable…a sort of rehearsal for Tragedy.”

In another journal entry he wrote: …there is [prophecy] in dreams….the soul in dreams has a subtle synthetic power which it will not exert under the sharp eyes of day. It does not like to be watched or looked upon…If in dreams you see…luxurious pictures, an inevitable tie drags in the sequel of cruelty and malignity.  If you swallow the devil’s bait, you will have a horizon full of dragons shortly.” Emerson understood dreams’ compensatory function, the means the soul has to make terror a “rehearsal for Tragedy.” Or, as I might say, to show us the original terror, the traumatic soul wound that, once acknowledged and “absolved,” (okay, I see you!) leaves one free to match the pirate with a pirate.

However it is known or seen/not seen in our community, The Other Side is a safe space for souls, as was the Cafe before it.  In that sense,  as much “church” as art gallery, but church as I like to think Emerson would have envisioned it.  More than a “space for the arts,” it is an enclosure protected by belief I hold to as Emerson instructs – “with fear and hope beneath it. ” It honors idealism in all its indefensible foolishness, creativity because it is divine, and above all, it holds that I’m meant to do that which I do in “self-trust.”  And answering the question I began with,  in secular liberal reality could one possibly be more transgressive, anarchist in the full sense, as good  highwaymen as the highwayman,  than to be a “church?

Kim C. Domenico, reside in Utica, New York, co-owner of Cafe Domenico (a coffee shop and community space),  and administrator of the small nonprofit independent art space, The Other Side.  Seminary trained and ordained,  but independently religious. She can be reached at: kodomenico@verizon.net.