Showing posts sorted by date for query KATRINA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query KATRINA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2026

 

World’s sinking river deltas put over 236mn people at risk

World’s sinking river deltas put over 236mn people at risk
River deltas occupy just 1% of the Earth’s land surface but are home to between 350mn and 500mn people and include 10 of the world’s 34 megacities. / patricianiculae0 via Pixabay
By Clare Nuttall in Glasgow January 14, 2026

Some of the world’s most densely populated river deltas are sinking faster than sea levels are rising, exposing more than 236mn people to growing flood risk, according to a major international study published on January 14.

The research, published in the journal Nature and led by the University of California, Irvine, with partners including the University of East Anglia (UEA), found that human-driven land subsidence, largely caused by groundwater extraction, is now the dominant factor behind the loss of elevation in many deltas.

River deltas occupy just 1% of the Earth’s land surface but host between 350mn and 500mn people and include 10 of the world’s 34 megacities. They underpin global food production, fisheries, ports and major transport networks, making their stability critical to national and international economies. Yet these low-lying landscapes, much of them less than two metres above sea level, are increasingly threatened by a combination of sinking land and rising seas.

“Our study provides the first delta-wide, high-resolution subsidence observations across 40 major river delta systems, revealing not just where land is sinking, but quantifying how much,” said Leonard Ohenhen, an assistant professor of Earth System Science at UC Irvine and lead author of the study, in a press release bne IntelliNews.

Using satellite radar data, the researchers mapped elevation change across 40 of the world’s largest deltas. They found that at least 35% of all delta land is sinking, and in 38 of the 40 deltas studied, more than half of the total area is subsiding.

In 18 deltas, including the Nile, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Mekong, Chao Phraya, Pearl and Yellow rivers, the average rate of land subsidence already exceeds the rate of regional sea-level rise.

“In every delta that we monitored at least some portion is sinking faster than the sea surface is rising,” said Professor Robert Nicholls of UEA and the University of Southampton, a co-author of the study. “In many densely populated deltas, like the Mekong, Chao Phraya and Nile, vast areas are sinking faster than current sea-level rise rates threatening many millions of people.”

Human footprint

All deltas naturally sink over time as newly deposited sediments compact under their own weight, but the study found that human activity has dramatically accelerated this process.

The main drivers are “excessive groundwater extraction, oil and gas exploitation, and land-use changes associated with urbanisation and agriculture”, the authors said.

The researchers calculated that in 35% of the deltas studied, groundwater pumping was the dominant cause of subsidence, as cities, farms and industries draw water from underground aquifers.

Subsidence rates vary widely, from less than one millimetre per year in Canada’s Fraser Delta to more than one centimetre per year in China’s Yellow River Delta, with many areas sinking at more than double the current rate of global sea-level rise.

In the US, the Mississippi River Delta continues to sink rapidly. The study found it is subsiding at an average of 3.3 millimetres per year, while local sea levels along the Gulf Coast are rising at about 7.3 millimetres per year. In some places, however, the land is sinking much faster, by more than 89 millimetres per decade, compounding Louisiana’s long-running land-loss crisis.

Globally, climate change is pushing sea levels higher as polar ice melts and oceans warm. Average global sea levels are now rising by about four millimetres per year. But the researchers warned that in many deltas, sinking land is the more immediate threat.

“The dominance of subsidence persists even when compared to future sea level rise worst-case scenarios,” the study said. “This means that for hundreds of millions of coastal residents, the immediate threat is not just climate change-driven sea level rise alone, but the more immediate threat of the ground sinking beneath their feet.”

“These results give delta communities a clearer picture of what is driving persistent flood risk and overall vulnerability, and that clarity matters,” Ohenhen said. “If land is sinking faster than the sea is rising, then investments in groundwater management, sediment restoration and resilient infrastructure become the most immediate and effective ways to reduce exposure.”

Subsidence overlooked

Nicholls said subsidence is often overlooked until the damage is already visible.

“Subsidence is often ignored until it causes impacts,” he told bne IntelliNews. “A range of options are available including mitigate human-induced subsidence by removing the causes of subsidence e.g., stopping groundwater withdrawal where this is causing subsidence – successfully employed in some cities – notably Tokyo and Osaka but not a universal response as yet.”

Another option is to rebuild land naturally using river sediments, though this is difficult in built-up areas.

“Promote accretion with sedimentation – but this means allowing flooding with sediment-laden water so difficult in urban areas – possible in rural and natural areas – still more of a concept than a real measure,” he said.

In many places, however, societies simply adapt to the sinking land. “Accept the subsidence and adapt to the changes – for relative sea-level rise due to subsidence you can do the same things as you would for sea-level rise – advance, protect, accommodate or retreat. [This is] widely done,” Nicholls said.

He added that the findings highlight the need for more integrated coastal management. “More generally, subsidence shows the need to take a more holistic perspective of managing coasts and considering all the drivers of hazard and risk in management,” he said.

Asia at the epicentre

While all deltas are affected to some degree, the most severe impacts are concentrated in fast-growing developing economies, especially in Asia.

“It affects all river deltas to some degree, but deltas where human-induced changes are fastest see the biggest issues – so mainly developing countries see the big changes,” Nicholls said. “Deltas are also concentrated in east, south-east and east Asia so there is a regional dimension to this issue.”

These regions are home to megacities such as Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh City, Shanghai and Dhaka, where tens of millions of people depend on fragile delta landscapes for housing, jobs, food and water.

Looking further ahead, Nicholls warned that the long-term viability of delta cities is increasingly uncertain.

“To my knowledge, no city has been abandoned to date due to subsidence and enhanced protection has been the norm,” he said. “However, New Orleans has not fully recovered post-Katrina and in Louisiana a lot of people moved vertically up (to Baton Rouge) which is a little higher.”

“Looking to the future your question is a concern and cities in deltas will only remain viable with substantial additional adaptation and efforts to address subsidence as well,” he added.

The researchers say their high-resolution mapping should help governments and planners decide where to focus scarce resources, combining efforts to slow subsidence with long-term climate adaptation as rising seas continue to push against the world’s most vulnerable landscapes.

Monday, January 12, 2026

 

Sandia’s economic impact sets record for 17th consecutive year




DOE/Sandia National Laboratories

2025 Economic Impact Graphic 

image: 

Sandia National Laboratories economic impact has grown for the 17th consecutive year.

view more 

Credit: Sandia National Labs





ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Sandia National Laboratories generated a record $5.2 billion in economic impact in 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year Sandia has set a new high, according to its annual economic impact report released this week.

The total represents a $40.5 million increase from 2024 and more than doubles Sandia’s economic impact from 12 years ago, reinforcing the laboratories’ role as one of New Mexico’s largest employers and economic engines.

“Sandia has been a strong part of New Mexico’s economy for more than 75 years,” said Labs Director Laura McGill.  “We are extremely proud of our contributions, which extend beyond the economy and include giving back to our community through financial donations and volunteer time. We are neighbors that are invested in making this an even greater place to live.”

Investing in the workforce

Sandia’s largest investment in 2025 was its workforce of approximately 16,000 people. Sandia spent nearly $2.95 billion on labor costs last year, an increase of $46 million from 2024. The increase reflects pay raises for the highly skilled scientists, engineers and professionals who fulfill Sandia’s national security mission.

With an average salary of $145,000, Sandia remains committed to keeping high-paying jobs in New Mexico.

“Our employees live here. They raise their families here. They volunteer in our schools, support local organizations and spend their paychecks at local businesses,” McGill said. “When we talk about economic impact, that’s what we’re really talking about.”

Working with small businesses

Sandia’s second largest expenditure in 2025 was $1.7 billion in subcontract-related payments, which were spent with businesses around the country that provide critical services to the Labs. Many of those are small businesses, a cornerstone to the nation’s economy.

“Sandia National Laboratories has a rich tradition of collaborating with a wide range of skilled small business suppliers who play a vital role in supporting our national security initiatives,” said Krista Smith, Sandia’s supply chain director.

Sandia spent $1.03 billion with small businesses in 2025, the third consecutive year it exceeded the billion-dollar mark. Of that amount, $463 million went to small businesses in New Mexico. Sandia also worked with 335 new small businesses during the year.

“I want to highlight the importance of working with new small businesses,” said Zach Mikelson, Sandia’s small business program manager. “They bring fresh, innovative ideas to the table, which can help develop better solutions for the nation, all while contributing to the local economy by creating jobs and supporting economic growth.”

In 2025 Sandia increased spending with veteran owned, service-disabled veteran-owned and HUBZone businesses. HUBZone businesses are located in historically underutilized business zones often facing higher unemployment and poverty rates.

Contributions to the public services

Sandia also contributed significantly to public services in New Mexico through tax payments.

In 2025, Sandia paid approximately $144 million in gross receipts taxes to the state of New Mexico, an increase of $11.3 million from the previous year. Overall, Sandia paid $148 million in corporate taxes, up $12.3 million, helping support programs and services that benefit New Mexicans statewide.

Investing in the future

One of the most important ways Sandia invests in the future is through education. In 2025, Sandia reached 14,000 students through STEM education programs, about 4,000 more than the year before. Sandia also engaged 700 teachers and community members; a 98.86% increase compared to 2024.

The community involvement team and teachers from Albuquerque Public Schools partnered with the National Museum of Nuclear Science to launch Mission Fission, a program that introduces nuclear science and energy concepts to eighth-grade students in Albuquerque Public Schools. The museum’s program aims to reach 4,500 students each year.

“These are students who may one day become engineers, scientists, technicians or small business owners in New Mexico,” McGill said. “Behind every statistic is a student discovering a love for science.”

Giving back to the community

Sandia also continued its strong tradition of giving back to the community. National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia LLC donated $1.6 million to local education, family stability and community leadership initiatives.

Employees also gave of their own time and money, donating more than $4 million to nonprofits through the United Way of North Central New Mexico, $15,000 for Shoes for Kids, $8,000 for school supply drives and $14,000 for Roadrunner Food Bank. Employees also donated 1,322 pints of blood in 2025 and volunteered at more than 50 volunteer events.

“As the nation’s premier engineering laboratory, Sandia’s mission is to address complex national security challenges, McGill said. “But we don’t do that in isolation. We pull from our community — one that includes local businesses, schools, nonprofits and tens of thousands of families across New Mexico and beyond.”

The 2025 Economic Impact Brochure is available here.

Sandia National Laboratories provides systems, science and technology to meet national security objectives in areas such as cybersecurity, science and technology products, and integrated military systems. 

Credit

(Photo by Craig Fritz)



Sandia National Laboratories’ primary mission is ensuring the U.S. nuclear arsenal is safe, secure and reliable, and can fully support our nation’s deterrence policy.

Credit

Craig Fritz/Sandia National Labs


Sandia National Laboratories project manager Josie Gallegos, left, and financial specialist Denise Johnson work at a Seed2Need event in Corrales, New Mexico, on Nov. 1. along with 45 other volunteers.

Credit

(Photo by Katrina Wagner/Sandia National Labs



Pablo Sandoval, right, and Tomas Giron, students from Jefferson Middle School in Albuquerque, let their car loose under the watchful eye of Sandia National Laboratories’ volunteer Justin Teo during the New Mexico Electric Car Challenge on Nov. 15. 

Credit

(Photo by Craig Fritz) Sandia National Labs

Thursday, January 01, 2026

The ‘Sacred’ Pledge that Will Power the Relaunch of Far-Fight Militia Oath Keepers



 January 1, 2026

Stewart Rhodes, the founder of the Oath Keepers, a far-right militia, announced in November 2025 that he will relaunch the group after it disbanded following his prison sentence in 2023.

Rhodes was sentenced to 18 years in prison for seditious conspiracy and other crimes committed during the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.

In January 2025, President Donald Trump granted clemency to the over 1,500 defendants convicted of crimes connected to the storming of the Capitol.

Trump did not pardon Rhodes – or some others found guilty of the most serious crimes on Jan. 6. He instead commuted Rhodes’ sentence to time servedCommutation only reduces the punishment for a crime, whereas a full pardon erases a conviction.

As a political anthropologist I study the Patriot movement, a collection of anti-government right-wing groups that include the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and Moms for Liberty. I specialize in alt-right beliefs, and I have interviewed people active in groups that participated in the Capitol riot.

Rhodes’ plans to relaunch the Oath Keepers, largely composed of current and former military veterans and law enforcement officers, is important because it will serve as an outlet for those who have felt lost since his imprisonment. The group claimed it had over 40,000 dues-paying members at the height of its membership during Barack Obama’s presidency. I believe that many of these people will return to the group, empowered by the lack of any substantial punishment resulting from the pardons for crimes committed on Jan. 6.

In my interviews, I’ve found that military veterans are treated as privileged members of the Patriot movement. They are honored for their service and military training. And that’s why I believe many former Oath Keepers will rejoin the group – they are considered integral members.

Their oaths to serving the Constitution and the people of the United States are treated as sacred, binding members to an ideology that leads to action. This action includes supporting people in conflicts against federal agencies, organizing citizen-led disaster relief efforts, and protesting election results like on Jan. 6. The members’ strength results from their shared oath and the reverence they feel toward keeping it.

Who are the Oath Keepers?

Rhodes joined the Army after high school and served for three years before being honorably discharged after a parachuting accident in 1986. He then attended the University of Nevada and later graduated from Yale Law School in 2004. He founded the Oath Keepers in 2009.

Oath Keepers takes its name from the U.S military Oath of Enlistment, which states:

“I, , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States …”

Informed by his law background, Rhodes places a particular emphasis on the part of the oath that states they will defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

He developed a legal theory that justifies ignoring what he refers to as “unlawful orders” after witnessing the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Following the natural disaster, local law enforcement was assigned the task of confiscating guns, many of which officers say were stolen or found in abandoned homes.

Rhodes was alarmed, believing that the Second Amendment rights of citizens were being violated. Because of this, he argued that people who had military or law enforcement backgrounds had a legal duty to refuse what the group considers unlawful orders, including any that violated constitutionally protected rights, such as the right to bear arms.

In the Oath Keepers’ philosophy, anyone who violates these rights are domestic enemies to the Constitution. And if you follow the orders, you’ve violated your oath.

Explaining the origin of the group on the right-wing website “The Gateway Pundit” in November 2025, Rhodes said: “… we were attacked out of the gate, labeled anti-government, which is absurd because we’re defending the Constitution that established the federal government. We were labeled anti-government extremists, all kinds of nonsense because the elites want blind obedience in the police and military.”

Rebuilding and restructuring

In 2022, the nonprofit whistleblower site Distributed Denial of Secrets leaked more than 38,000 names on the Oath Keepers’ membership list.

The Anti-Defamation League estimated that nearly 400 of the names were active law enforcement officers, and that over 100 were serving in the military. Some of these members were investigated by their workplaces but never disciplined for their involvement with the group.

Some members who were not military or law enforcement did lose their jobs over their affiliation. But they held government-related positions, such as a Wisconsin alderman who resigned after he was identified as a member.

This breach of privacy, paired with the dissolution of the organization after Rhodes’ sentencing, will help shape the group going forward.

In his interview with “The Gateway Pundit,” where he announced the group’s relaunch, Rhodes said: “I want to make it clear, like I said, my goal would be to make it more cancel-proof than before. We’ll have resilient, redundant IT that makes it really difficult to take down. … And I want to make sure I get – put people in charge and leadership everywhere in the country so that, you know, down the road, if I’m taken out again, that it can still live on under good leadership without me being there.”

There was a similar shift in organizational structure with the Proud Boys in 2018. That’s when their founder, Gavin McInnes, stepped away from the organization. His departure came after a group of Proud Boys members were involved in a fight with anti-fascists in New York.

Prosecutors wanted to try the group as a gang. McInnes, therefore, distanced himself to support their defense that they weren’t in a gang or criminal organization. Ultimately, two of the members were sentenced to four years in prison for attempted gang assault charges.

Some Proud Boys members have told me they have since focused on creating local chapters, with in-person recruitment, that communicate on private messaging apps. They aim to protect themselves from legal classification as a gang. It also makes it harder for investigators or activist journalists to monitor them.

This is referred to as a cell style of organization, which is popular with insurgency groups. These groups are organized to rebel against authority and overthrow government structures. The cell organizational style does not have a robust hierarchy but instead produces smaller groups. They all adhere to the same ideology but may not be directly associated.

They may have a leader, but it’s often acknowledged that they are merely a figurehead, not someone giving direct orders. For the Proud Boys, this would be former leader Enrique Tarrio. Proud Boys members I’ve spoken to have referred to him as a “mascot” and not their leader.

Looking ahead

So what does the Rhodes interview indicate about the future of Oath Keepers?

Members will continue supporting Trump while also recruiting more retired military and law enforcement officers. They will create an organizational structure designed to outlive Rhodes. And based on my interactions with the far-right, I believe it’s likely they will create an organizational structure similar to that of the cell style for organizing.

Beyond that, they are going to try to own their IT, which includes hosting their websites and also using trusted online revenue generators.

This will likely provide added security, protecting their membership rolls while making it more difficult for law enforcement agencies to investigate them in the future.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Alexander Lowie is a Postdoctoral associate in Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida.