Showing posts sorted by date for query wind. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query wind. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

VIDEO

Lost 19th Century Film By Méliès Discovered At The Library Of Congress


Photographic portrait of Georges Méliès at 34, in 1895. Photo Credit: Wikipedia Commons, retouched


April 15, 2026
 Library of Congress
By Neely Tucker

The reels of film were old and battered and no one knew what was on them.

They were from before World War I and had been shuttled around from basements to barns to garages and had just been dropped off at the Library. There were about 10 of them and they were rusted. Some were misshapen. The nitrate film stock had crumbled to bits on some; other strips were stuck together.

The librarians peeled them apart and gently looked them over, frame by frame.

And there, on one film, was a black star painted onto a pedestal in the center of the screen. The action was of a magician and a robot battling it out in slapstick fashion. It took a bit, but then the gasp of realization: They were looking at “Gugusse and the Automaton,” a long-lost film by the iconic French filmmaker George Méliès at his Star Film company.

The 45-second film, made around 1897, was the first appearance on film of what might be called a robot, which had endeared it to generations of science fiction fans, even if they knew it only by reputation. It had not been seen by anyone in likely more than a century. The find, made last September but now being announced publicly, is a small but important addition to the legacy of world cinema and one of its founders.Gugusse et l’Automate English language title: Gugusse and the automaton

“This story is one that you see movies or television shows written about,” says Jason Evans Groth, curator of the Library’s moving image section.

“This is one of the collections that makes you realize why you do this,” said Courtney Holschuh, the archive technician who unraveled the film. (Here’s how they did it.)

Equally delighted was Bill McFarland, the donor who had driven the box of films from his home in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to the Library’s National Audio-Visual Conservation Center in Culpeper, Virginia, to have the cache evaluated.

His great-grandfather, William Delisle Frisbee, had been a potato farmer and schoolteacher in western Pennsylvania by day, but by night he was a traveling showman. He drove his horse and buggy from town to town to dazzle the locals with a projector and some of the world’s first moving pictures.

He set up shop in a local schoolroom, church, lodge or civic auditorium and showed magic lantern slides and short films with music from a newfangled phonograph. It was shocking.

“They must have been thrilled,” McFarland said. “They must have been out of their minds to see this motion picture and to hear the Edison phonograph.”

A Méliès film would have been an unforgettable experience to almost anyone in the 19th century.

A prominent French stage magician, he turned to filmmaking as soon as he saw the Lumière brothers’ world-first motion pictures in Paris in 1895. That a camera could rapidly project a series of still images on film and thus make them appear to move – “motion pictures” – was seen as a magic trick unto itself.

Méliès built his own camera and a glass studio (like a greenhouse) in Paris. He filmed ordinary scenes at first, but after accidentally discovering that a jump cut appeared on film as an astonishing transformation, he pioneered other tricks such as double exposure, black screens and forced perspective. All of these became staples of cinema. On screen, he could make a man appear to take off his head and flip it in the air, or a woman disappear, reappear and double.

He was also a devotee of the science fiction work of Jules Verne and H.G. Wells, and his films often featured surreal, fantastical sets and manic action. An image from his most famous film, “A Trip to the Moon” – that of a rocket landing in the eye of the man on the moon – became the image representing early cinema. It now plays at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. His 1896 short, “Le Manoir du Diable,” is considered to be the world’s first horror film.

More than a century later, his lasting impact was exemplified in Martin Scorsese’s 2011 film “Hugo,” about a boy and an automaton in 1931 Paris. An elderly Méliès – by then, as in real life, a toy-shop owner largely forgotten by the world – appears as the boy’s soft-spoken savior.


“Gugusse,” for its part, is a one-shot, one-reel short filmed in front of a painted screen made to look like a workshop in which clocks and automatons were being made. For centuries, inventors and engineers had made wind-up automatons – contraptions full of gears and levers with a shell that looked like a person – that could, as the gears unwound, do all sorts of things, even writing and drawing.

In “Gugusse,” the magician (Méliès), winds up an automaton dressed like the famous clown Pierrot, which is standing on a pedestal. Once wound up, the clown begins to beat the magician with his walking stick. The magician retaliates by getting a huge sledgehammer and bashing the automaton over the head, with each blow seeming to shrink it in half, until it is just a small doll. The magician then smashes it into the floor.




Méliès made more than 500 films but never progressed beyond his early technical achievements. The film world passed him by. In World War I, the negatives for most of his films were melted down for silver and celluloid, and he burned more himself after the war.

But because his work had once been so popular – and because of widespread pirating – duplicate copies remained, and today about 300 of his films are known to exist. The Library has about 60. The “Gugusse” print McFarland gave to the Library is a duplicate at least three times removed from the original.

Library technicians spent more than a week scanning and stabilizing it onto a digital format, so that it can now be seen by anyone online – in 4K, no less.

The cache of Frisbee’s exhibition films also contained another well-known Méliès film from 1900, “The Fat and Lean Wrestling Match,” as well as fragments of an early Thomas Edison film, “The Burning Stable.” They survived due to McFarland and his family preserving them for a century, if often in haphazard circumstances.

After Frisbee died in 1937, two small trunks of his old projectors and films, along with some of his diaries and papers, went to his daughter (McFarland’s grandmother), who passed them along to her son (McFarland’s dad), who passed them along to him.

McFarland didn’t know what was on the reels – they could no longer be safely run through a projector – and after years of searching for a home for them, a lab technician in Michigan suggested he contact the Library.


“The moment we set our eyes on this box of film, we knew it was something special,” said George Willeman, the Library’s nitrate film vault leader.

McFarland, relieved to have finally found a home for his family’s treasure chest, found it all fascinating, the films and the diaries of his wandering showman of a great-grandfather.

“He talks about full houses, and rowdy houses, and canceled shows, and he went all the way to the Pennsylvania-Maryland line, and I think into Ohio as well,” he said. “He made as much as $20 bucks a night, I see in his records, and sometimes he made $1.35 for the night, you know?”

It was, this deep dive into the old boxes and trunks in the attic, a magic trick known to researchers, historians and librarians – documents from another time drawing you back into a world gone by.


This article was published by the Library of Congress

The Library of Congress is the largest library in the world, with millions of books, films and video, audio recordings, photographs, newspapers, maps and manuscripts in its collections. The Library is the main research arm of the U.S. Congress and the home of the U.S. Copyright Office.


‘A Sign of What’s to Come’: Super Typhoon Sinlaku Slams Into Remote US Islands in Pacific

The latest storm continues a trend of “unprecedented battering” by Category 4s and 5s for US territories.



Super Typhoon Sinlaku makes landfall the North Pacific Ocean, as seen in a satellite photo captured on April 13, 2026.
(Photo by NASA Earth Observatory/Michala Garrison)


Brad Reed
Apr 14, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Super Typhoon Sinlaku slammed into the Northern Mariana Islands on Tuesday, causing severe damage to the US-controlled territories that are home to roughly 50,000 people.

According to a Tuesday report from The Associated Press, the typhoon that struck the islands of Tinian and Saipan was the strongest storm recorded so far this year, delivering sustained winds of up to 150 miles per hour.



‘We Lost Everything’: Hawaii Swamped by Worst Flooding in 20 Years


Saipan Mayor Ramon “RB” Jose Blas Camacho told the AP he was concerned about how the storm’s severity was hindering local rescue operations.

“It’s so difficult for us to respond with this heavy rain, heavy wind to rescue people,” he said. “Objects are just flying left and right.”

Marko Korosec, a storm chaser and weather forecaster, analyzed satellite images of the storm and predicted the Northern Mariana Islands would be hit with “violent, destructive winds, catastrophic storm surges, giant waves, and flooding rain.”

“The damage,” he wrote, “will be extreme.”

An analysis of the storm written by hurricane scientist Jeff Masters and published by Yale Climate Connections projected that “damage from Sinlaku will be severe on both islands.”

Masters also said Sinlaku was just the latest in what he described as an “unprecedented” number of Category 4 and Category 5 typhoons over the last decade, which he attributed to “a combination of natural variability and climate change.”

“Beginning in 2017, the US has gotten absolutely hammered by high-intensity Category 4 and 5 hurricanes,” Masters explained. “Seven have hit the continental US, one has hit Puerto Rico, and now two have hit the Northern Mariana Islands. That’s as many US Cat 4 and Cat 5 landfalls as had occurred in the prior 57 years.”

Later in his analysis, Masters pointed out that 10 of the 13 strongest tropical typhoons to make landfall in the last 80 years have occurred since 2006.

A Washington Post analysis of the typhoon published Tuesday noted that it’s “unusually early” for a superstorm of this caliber to form in the Pacific, warning it “may be a sign of what’s to come” this season.

“The season is expected to be anomalously active because of a burgeoning El Niño, which induces a warming of water temperatures,” explained the Post. “That helps air to rise, generating more, and stronger, storms.”

The Post added that Sinlaku is “the last in rare set of triplet cyclones that formed this month,” which it said is an “unusual pattern” that is “also contributing to a burst of winds that is expected to greatly boost the odds of a super El Niño later this year, pushing warm water west-to-east across the Pacific.”

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Switzerland Wants A Global Roadmap To Phase Out Fossil Fuels – Analysis

April 14, 2026 
SwissInfo
By Luigi Jorio

The Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels – scheduled April 24 to 29 in Santa Marta, Colombia – is the first-ever international summit dedicated solely to phasing out fossil fuels. The conference has taken on a new urgency as the conflict in the Middle East causes disruption in the oil and gas markets.
 
What is the goal of the conference on fossil fuels and who is taking part?


The conference, co-organised by Colombia and the Netherlands, aims to develop concrete solutions to accelerate the gradual elimination of fossil fuels, in line with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. The meeting seeks to define the legal tools, economic measures and social change needed to ensure a just and orderly transition.

Switzerland will take part in the conference and will be represented by the Ambassador for the Environment, Felix Wertli, the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) says. Another 45 countries, including fossil fuel producers such as Canada and Norway, have confirmed they will attend.

The Santa Marta summit represents a new space for dialogue and cooperation after fossil fuel discussions stalled at the most recent UN Climate Conference (COP30), held in Belém, Brazil. However, it does not intend to replace the formal UN climate negotiations (which some argue are overly influenced by oil lobbies). Its purpose is to create a complementary intergovernmental platform to support practical action by countries that wish to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels.

Why is there a conference on fossil fuel transition now?


Fossil fuels are responsible for 68% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Replacing them with cleaner alternatives such as solar and wind is essential to achieving climate goals.

At the 2023 COP in Dubai, for the first time in more than 30 years of climate negotiations, nearly 200 countries acknowledged the need to progressively reduce the consumption of oil, gas, and coal. However, no concrete progress has been made since then.

While investments in renewable energy have increased, global fossil fuel production is still projected to grow in the coming years.

Last year in Belém, more than 80 countries supported the Brazilian presidency’s idea of a global roadmap for the transition away from fossil fuels. However, the proposal did not make it into the conference’s final text. The blockage came mainly from large oil-producing states such as Saudi Arabia and Russia, as well as from China and India, which are reluctant to undertake a real and rapid shift.

To keep international pressure alive, a smaller group of countries led by Colombia and the Netherlands sought to open new diplomatic ground outside the COP negotiating process, giving rise to the Belém Declaration on a Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels. The document acknowledges that fossil fuel production, consumption, licensing, and subsidies are incompatible with international climate goals.

The Declaration – described as historic because it was also endorsed by fossil fuel producing nations such as Mexico and Australia – laid the groundwork for the Santa Marta conference.


What is Switzerland’s position on phasing out fossil fuels?


Switzerland supports the Brazilian initiative for an international roadmap to exit fossil fuels. The roadmap should identify concrete milestones for implementing the transition, FOEN says. Switzerland is also engaged in international initiatives aimed at eliminating the billions in subsidies granted to fossil fuels.

“The conference in Santa Marta will offer an initial space to exchange views on shared challenges. It marks the beginning of a discussion that is absolutely necessary but also complex,” FOEN writes in an email.

The transition away from fossil fuels is not only a climate issue. It also requires reflection on the implications for the economy, finance, energy security and, not least, the livelihoods of the millions of people working in the fossil fuel industry.

Domestically, Switzerland aims to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. The country has not adopted an explicit ban on fossil fuels. Rather, it plans to reduce their consumption mainly by encouraging the replacement of heating systems in buildings and supporting innovative and sustainable technologies in the industrial sector.

Léonore Hälg of the Swiss Energy Foundation argues that the switch from fossil fuels (and nuclear energy) to electricity and a decreased energy demand significantly reduce Switzerland’s dependence on supplies from geopolitically unstable regions. “The current conflict in the Middle East is a perfect showcase of how powerless oil-importing countries are in reaction to price surges,” she told Swissinfo.

What impact does the Middle East conflict have on the fossil fuel phaseout?

The energy crisis triggered by the US and Israel’s attack on Iran will strengthen the calls for a global phaseout of fossil fuels, Hälg says. However, she adds, “I am not sure it will have a direct effect on countries’ short-term willingness to commit to a clear and binding roadmap for phasing out fossil fuels.”

Paola Yanguas Parra, a policy advisor at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, argues that the current crisis shows that “fossil fuels are not delivering energy security — they are undermining it.” In this sense, she tells Swissinfo, it is likely that this moment will strengthen the case for a global phaseout.

Yanguas Parra identifies two opposing trends: while some governments are expanding fossil fuel production or infrastructure in the name of energy security, others are using the shock to accelerate the shift toward cleaner and more resilient systems. “When the right incentives and political will are in place, this transition [toward renewable energy] can happen quickly,” she says, citing Uruguay’s example of achieving a near-fully renewable power system in under a decade.

Fossil fuel-producing countries, for their part, could use high oil and gas prices as an opportunity to shift courses, Yanguas Parra argues. “If managed well, revenues from high-priced periods can also help some fossil fuel exporters invest in economic diversification, workforce transition and social protection — building long-term resilience instead of deeper dependence,” she says.

What can be expected from the conference on fossil fuels?

The conference will not produce any binding agreement. However, analysts predict that it may develop a shared document on a “just, orderly, and equitable” transition away from fossil fuels, including minimum objectives and more ambitious language than that seen at previous UN climate conferences. This could serve as an initial draft of a globally shared roadmap for a gradual phaseout.

The organising committee hopes that the initial group of “willing countries” behind the Belém Declaration will expand into a broader coalition of governments, international institutions, and companies determined to lay the groundwork for moving beyond fossil fuels.


SwissInfo

swissinfo is an enterprise of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation (SBC). Its role is to inform Swiss living abroad about events in their homeland and to raise awareness of Switzerland in other countries. swissinfo achieves this through its nine-language internet news and information platform.

 

Super magma reservoirs discovered beneath Tuscany



A Swiss-Italian team has discovered 6,000 km³ of magma beneath Tuscany.



Université de Genève





How can magma buried 5, 10, or even 15 km underground be detected without any surface indicators? The answer lies in ambient noise tomography, a technique that analyses natural ground vibrations with high precision. A team from the University of Geneva (UNIGE), the Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources (CNR-IGG), and the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV) has identified a vast reservoir containing approximately 6,000 km3 of magma beneath Tuscany. Beyond its scientific significance, this breakthrough paves the way for faster and more cost-effective exploration methods to locate resources such as geothermal reservoirs, lithium, and rare earth elements, whose formation is closely linked to deep magmatic systems. The study was published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment.


Yellowstone National Park in the United States, Lake Toba in Indonesia, or Lake Taupo in New Zealand: these iconic volcanic sites harbor immense magma reservoirs measuring several thousand kmbeneath their surfaces. Their presence has been revealed through surface evidence such as eruptive deposits, craters, ground deformation, and gas emissions. However, in the absence of such signals, large volumes of magma can remain hidden and unsuspected deep within the Earth’s crust.


This was precisely the case in Tuscany, where reservoirs containing approximately 6,000 km3 of volcanic fluids at depths of 8–15 km within the continental crust were discovered by a team from the UNIGE, with contributions from researchers at the Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources (IGG-CNR) and the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV).


Although this magma body could, in theory, contribute to the formation of a supervolcano over geological timescales, it currently poses no threat. “We knew that this region, which extends from north to south across Tuscany, is geothermally active, but we did not realize it contained such a large volume of magma, comparable to that of supervolcanic systems such as Yellowstone,” explains Matteo Lupi, associate professor in the Department of Earth Sciences at UNIGE’s Faculty of Science, who led the study.


An X-ray of the deep subsurface
This molten rock was detected using ambient noise tomography, a subsurface imaging technique widely used in seismology. It makes it possible to “X-ray” the Earth’s crust by harnessing natural environmental vibrations generated by ocean waves, wind, or human activity. As these signals travel through the ground, they are recorded by high-resolution seismic sensors deployed at the surface — around 60 instruments were used in this study. When seismic waves propagate at unusually low velocities, this can indicate the presence of molten material such as magma.


Combined analysis of the recordings made it possible to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the internal structure of the covered area. "These results are important both for fundamental research and for practical applications, such as locating geothermal reservoirs or deposits rich in lithium and rare earth elements, which are used, for example, in electric vehicle batteries. In addition to their great scientific interest, these studies show that tomography, by exploring the subsoil quickly and at low cost, can be a useful tool for the energy transition," concludes Matteo Lupi.

 

Computational “time machine” shows solar and wind on track for 2°C target but not for 1.5°C




Chalmers University of Technology
Avi Jakhmola 

image: 

Avi Jakmola, PhD Student, Department of Environmental and Energy Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

view more 

Credit: Chalmers University of Technology | Christian Löwhagen





Wind and solar power have grown faster than almost anyone predicted but projecting their future expansion remains surprisingly difficult. Researchers at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, have developed what they call a computational “time machine” – a model that outperforms existing projection methods by using AI techniques to analyse historical growth patterns across countries. Their central projection shows that onshore wind is likely to supply around 25 per cent of global electricity by 2050, with solar reaching about 20 per cent. This is consistent with the 2°C target, but falls short of what is required for 1.5°C.

Predicting the future is particularly challenging for technologies like wind and solar, where rapid cost declines are offset by growing barriers such as public opposition, infrastructure constraints and policy shifts.

“Existing models are very good at identifying what needs to happen to reach climate targets, but they can’t tell us which developments are most likely. That’s the gap we wanted to fill”, says Jessica Jewell, Professor at Chalmers University of Technology.

Across more than 200 countries, the researchers identified a recurring pattern in how wind and solar power grow: long periods of relatively steady expansion punctuated by sudden growth spurts often triggered by policy shifts.

“Most models assume a smooth S-shaped growth curve, but that’s not how it actually looks in the real world. Growth often comes in bursts, and if you ignore that, you can misjudge how fast technologies will expand,” says Avi Jakhmola, PhD Student at Chalmers University of Technology and first author of the paper published in Nature Energy.

13,000 virtual worlds for the future

So, with the goal of improving the predictions, Jakhmola created a model built on 13,000 virtual worlds. In each of these worlds, solar and wind power develop in different ways – from the fastest possible expansion to the slowest – and everything in between. A machine learning algorithm was then trained on all these worlds to learn to predict global outcomes from early national trends.

“When we apply the model to real-world data, it can tell us what is the most probable outcome for the future – given what we have seen so far and given all the virtual worlds it has seen”, says Jakhmola.

By 2050, the model projects onshore wind reaching around 26 per cent of global electricity (central range: 20-34 per cent), and solar around 21 per cent (15-29 per cent). This broadly aligns with 2°C-compatible pathways but falls short of what’s needed for 1.5°C.

The projections also put the COP28 pledge to triple renewables capacity by 2030 in perspective. The pledge falls near the 95th percentile meaning that it would require growth rates rarely observed.

“The tripling of renewables pledge is not impossible, but it would require everything to go extremely well in all countries”, says Jewell.

The researchers also tested what would actually be required if we are to reach the 1.5°C goal.

“If we start now, the required growth rates are demanding but not unprecedented, comparable to what the EU targets for wind with REPowerEU and what India has planned for solar power,” says Jakhmola. “But if we delay until 2030, the acceleration needed becomes much steeper and much more abrupt. The window for ramping up closes quickly.”

Going back in time to ensure the model’s reliability

The researchers also used the model to test the reliability of its projections – by going back in time.

“We wanted to know if our projections will hold up ten or twenty years from now. When we fed the model only data from 2015, we found that it correctly predicts what has happened since then. This is what we mean by a ‘computational time machine’ and it gives us real confidence in the projections going forward”, says Jakhmola.

The study points toward a broader ambition to develop scientifically-rigorous methods for projecting the most likely growth paths for other low-carbon technologies, not just wind and solar.

Jessica Jewell says: “It’s long been a joke how bad technology forecasts are. But if you’re a decision maker, trying to figure out how hard to push for change, you need a realistic baseline. Our study is the first step towards developing such a realistic view of the future.”

More about the research:

The paper 'Probabilistic projections of global wind and solar power growth based on historical national experience',  has been published in Nature Energy. The researchers have also made an online visualisation tool of the results, available at the Energy Technology and Policy website. The authors are Avi Jakhmola,  Jessica Jewell, Vadim Vinichenko and Aleh Cherp. The researchers are active at Chalmers University of Technology and Lund University in Sweden, University of Bergen in Norway, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and Central European University in Austria.

 

More about the targets and the Paris Climate Agreement:

The Paris Climate Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 196 Parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris, France, on 12 December 2015 and entered into force on 4 November 2016. Its overarching goal is to hold “the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels” and pursue efforts “to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.”


Link between pollinators and diverse landscapes is a two-way street



Iowa State University
Pollination exclusion 

image: 

Nathan Soley, left, and Brian Wilsey adjusting the bag covering flowering plants in a prairie space near Ames, Iowa. Wilsey and Soley covered tens of thousands of flowering plants to study the impact pollination has on plant diversity.

view more 

Credit: Christopher Gannon/Iowa State University





AMES, Iowa – Ecologists have long seen a strong connection between biodiversity and pollinators – the butterflies, birds, bats, bees and other insects that help the flowers they snack on fertilize by transferring pollen from male anthers to female stigma.

Previous research has shown diverse landscapes draw more pollinators, as a wider variety of pollen and nectar attracts attention from a wider variety of animals – some which only feed on certain plants. Essentially, pollinators go where the food is, said Brian Wilsey, a professor of ecology, evolution and organismal biology at Iowa State University.

A recent study by Wilsey and doctoral graduate Nathan Soley showed the converse is also true: Pollinators support diversity in plant communities. In an article published this month in Ecology, Wilsey and Soley described a four-year experiment they conducted in plots of restored prairie that examined how plant diversity was affected by purposely protecting wildflowers from pollinators. Among animal-pollinated plants, viable seed production fell by 50% and the diversity of species fell by 27%, they found.

“Our study is the first we are aware of to show that plant biodiversity at the community level can be limited by a lack of pollinators,” Wilsey said.

Handling 68,000 flowers

The study was inspired by a familiar dynamic in prairie restoration areas, said Wilsey, a grassland ecologist. When first planted, restorations usually feature a varied assortment of species that includes wildflowers. However, wind-pollinated grasses will often dominate within a few years, crowding out other types of plants. A lack of pollinators could help explain those rapid shifts, if they play a role in maintaining biodiversity.

Ecologists have assumed pollinators support biodiversity, but the relatively scant amount of research quantifying the effect has focused on individual species, Soley said. 

“Things get a lot more complicated at a community level,” he said. “I think it’s important to test our assumptions if we’re going to be all in on pollinators.”

Wilsey and Soley’s experiment was conducted on about 50 acres of university land south of Ames. In 54 circular plots 2 meters wide, the researchers covered flowers with sheer fabric bags that let light in but kept pollinators out. They also augmented pollination in the flowers of another set of plots by transferring pollen by hand, using Q-tips and small paint brushes. Over four growing seasons, they either bagged or hand-pollinated about 68,000 flowers during their weekly trips to the study site, Soley said.

Wilsey and Soley measured seed production and biodiversity within each of the plots, comparing data from areas where pollination was enhanced or prohibited to undisturbed control plots. While the effects became more dramatic over time, it was clear in the first year that the exclusion treatments would have an impact because pollen visibly piled up inside the flower bags, Soley said.

The study’s results suggest significant declines in pollinators could cause biodiversity losses that further reduce pollinator populations, causing a self-reinforcing downward trend in both that the researchers call a “plant-pollinator extinction vortex.”

“Before this study, I would have never thought that pollinators were this important to maintaining biodiversity. It really opened my eyes,” Wilsey said. 

Implications for restorations

Pollinators are essential because of their role in food production. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, about 35% of global food crops depend on animal pollination to reproduce, making the seeds and fruits that humans harvest.

In addition to providing critical support for pollinators and other wildlife, diverse landscapes improve water and soil quality. In prairies, which used to cover most of Iowa, a variety of life makes ecosystems more resilient to droughts, floods and invasive species. Beyond pollinators, the known pro-biodiversity factors include low nutrient availability, proximity to other quality habitat and a lack of human degradation, Wilsey said.

One major implication of knowing pollinators help maintain plant biodiversity is the need to consider the presence of pollinator habitat when establishing prairie restoration areas. That’s especially true for urban projects, Wilsey said. The human-enhanced pollination plots in the study showed no change in biodiversity when compared to the control plots, an indication that there were sufficient bees and other pollinators in the area. But that’s less likely to be the case in more human-impacted environments.

Future experiments could use the same methods in different settings to see how much of a difference pollinators make for biodiversity when there are other complicating factors, Wilsey said.

The experiment, now entering its seventh year, is continuing at the study plots near Ames. It’s time-intensive work, but it’s worth it to better understand how pollinators and plant communities affect each other, Soley said.

“These mutualisms are important to preserve,” he said.

Monday, April 13, 2026

Opinion

From Hegseth to RFK Jr., leaders are using religion as symbol — not substance

(RNS) — In both cases, Christianity has been severed from the theological tradition that both limits it and gives it coherence.


U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, left, prays over Pastor Doug Wilson during a Pentagon chapel service. (DOD photo)

Karen E. Park
April 6, 2026
RNS

(RNS) — In the past several weeks, religious language has been used in American public life with unusual intensity and disturbing clarity. President Donald Trump ended an Easter morning obscenity-laced threat of violence to Iran with the mocking words “Praise be to Allah.” Also on Easter Sunday, several departments of the Trump administration posted messages celebrating Christ’s resurrection, including the Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, the Defense Department and the Justice Department.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has continued to invoke Scripture to sanction the Iranian war, even as he has removed the Army’s chief of chaplains, Maj. Gen. William Green Jr., from his post, where he has been responsible for advising senior leaders on religious issues and troop morale.

None of these are isolated developments. They raise urgent and fundamental questions about what it means to speak about God in a time of war.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s recent prayer at the Pentagon was particularly notable for its violent religious language. On Wednesday, March 25, he prayed that American forces be granted “overwhelming violence of action” against those who “deserve no mercy,” and that these actions be carried out “without remorse.” He asked God to “break the teeth of the ungodly” and “blow them away like chaff before the wind.” The language is jarring, but it is not original to Hegseth. It draws directly on some of the most violent passages in the biblical Psalms, like Psalm 58’s plea to God to “break the teeth of the wicked.”

Within the Christian tradition, the handful of Psalms quoted in Hegseth’s prayer are known as the imprecatory Psalms, and they are among the most difficult passages in the Bible. For millennia they have been interpreted with caution and often redirected inward, toward the human struggle against sin rather than the destruction of persons. For example, in his “Expositions on the Psalms,” Augustine of Hippo takes one of the verses used by Hegseth from Psalm 144, which addresses the God “who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle” and reads it as a description of the Christian life of charity. This “war,” Augustine teaches, is not against human enemies but against sin, and it is waged not through violence but through mercy. For Augustine, God is love as revealed in Christ, and therefore all of Scripture must be read according to this precept. To read a violent passage in Scripture as literally authorizing violence, the way Hegseth does, is to fundamentally misunderstand God’s nature.

Pope Leo XIV has condemned the Iran war in very strong terms. On Palm Sunday (March 29), he preached, “Brothers and sisters, this is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war. He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.” And on Easter Sunday, Pope Leo condemned the “abuses that crush the weakest among us, because of the idolatry of profit that plunders the earth’s resources, because of the violence of war that kills and destroys.” Pope Leo is an Augustinian priest — so his understanding both of war and of the Psalms that Hegseth uses to justify and celebrate violence and destruction — is grounded in Augustine’s theological understanding. One summary of this understanding can be found in Augustine’s “On Christian Doctrine,”: “Whoever thinks that he understands the divine Scriptures or any part of them so that it does not build up the double love of God and of our neighbor does not understand it at all.”

It is unlikely that Hegseth is aware of this theological tradition. He simply takes some of the most violent lines in the Bible and combines them into a seamless appeal for destruction. Reading the actual imprecatory Psalms in full, not just a cherry-picked selection of violent lines, reveals them to be powerful prayers of anguish and grief, arising from the Psalmist’s feelings of vulnerability as much as his rage or desire for vengeance. In Hegseth’s mashup, however, all the complexity and tension disappear, and only decontextualized biblical bloodlust remains.

While Hegseth uses Scripture to sanction violence and war, we are seeing other prominent religious figures — such as Candace Owens and Megyn Kelly, both Catholic — lean on the imagery of Christianity for its symbolic power, especially for its association with authority and order. Matthew Schmitz, a religion editor and commenter, has recently described this phenomenon as “unreligious religiosity.” The problem, however, is not that the use of these symbolic objects and gestures lacks religion, but that it lacks theology.

One recent example is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s appearance, holding a rosary, on the January 2026 cover of The Atlantic. The object functions as a signal of religious identity and authority, but without any real engagement with the theological tradition it represents. In this form of public religion, the rosary is not prayed but displayed; it operates as a symbol rather than as part of a disciplined devotional and intellectual practice. What results is a religiosity detached from the theological frameworks that give devotional objects and ritual practices their meaning.

The two tendencies — Hegseth’s, which invokes Scripture, and Kennedy’s, which invokes a particular material dimension of religion — are not different, they are symptoms of the same condition. In both cases, religion has been severed from the theological tradition that both limits it and gives it coherence.

The Christian theological tradition insists Scripture cannot be read in bits and pieces, cobbled together irresponsibly in order to support an agenda of death and destruction. The Bible must instead be read in light of other Scripture and within a broader theological tradition. This means that Jesus’ command to love one’s enemies stands when it is most difficult — even and especially during times of war. Christian theology cannot be decided by any individual — no matter how powerful. Its meaning comes from a body of knowledge that has responsibly sought to interpret and understand the will of God for centuries.

The danger is not only that military leaders are using religious language to justify violence, or that online influencers are using simplistic memes and images as religious shorthand. The danger is that in both cases, the discipline of theology that must give these texts and objects their meaning is absent. Theology places limits on what can be said in God’s name. Without those theological limits, God can be made to authorize and endorse anything — including hatred, bloodlust and merciless destruction.

(Karen E. Park, a former professor of theology and religious studies at St. Norbert College, is the co-editor of American Patroness: Marian Shrines and the Making of US Catholicism. She writes on Substack at Ex Voto. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)