Wednesday, June 19, 2024

Belarus: the indoctrination of minors is rising in scale and taking on new forms


We have previously reported on the strong, state-sponsored indoctrination of youth in Belarus with Soviet-style, anti-Western propaganda following the falsified 2020 presidential elections and subsequent large demonstrations against the authorities. This worrying trend has continued. Lately, authorities have launched nationwide anti-Ukrainian propaganda campaigns and pushed Belarusian youth to embrace the ‘Russkiy Mir’ (Russian World) ideology that the Kremlin is now spreading more aggressively.

Russification

The Moscow-designed  of Russkiy Mir seeks to promote an ideology(opens in a new tab) based on historically revanchist, imperial Russian supremacy. Belarusian ruler Alyaksandr Lukashanka has steered Belarus deeper into Moscow’s orbit through three primary means. The first is ‘oblastisation’, or Moscow’s creeping control of the country, including Russia’s use of Belarusian territory and infrastructure for the ongoing war against Ukraine. The second is Belarus’s cultural ‘russification’. The third is ‘sovietisation’, or the Belarusian state’s organisation and control(opens in a new tab) of all parts of society.

A 16-year-old ‘head of a terrorist cell’

In late April 2024, the Belarusian state ONT TV channel released a propaganda movie titled, ‘Children at Gunpoint: Recruited by the Enemy’(opens in a new tab). Strongly promoted in state media, the movie builds on several unrelated stories of Belarusian minors whom it accuses of preparing acts of sabotage and terrorist acts in Belarus under the supervision of Ukrainian intelligence services.

One story featured a 16-year-old Ukraine-born girl as the alleged leader of a terrorist cell called the ‘Black Nightingales’. This piece portrayed a few Belarusian teenagers with anarchist views as terrorist cell members who were planning deadly attacks under the supervision of Ukrainian actors. The film did not provide conclusive evidence for these strong accusations. See similar reports(opens in a new tab) about the presumed role of Belarus KGB in framing the teenagers.

A screenshot of the movie supposedly depicting the 16-year-old Maria, link(opens in a new tab). We have chosen to blur the image and personal details in this article. The face is not blurred in the ONT TV movie.

The movie’s creators seemingly intended to spread anti-Ukrainian sentiments among Belarusian youth and to discourage young people from using sources of information other than official ones. They also portrayed conversations with unknown parties via Telegram messenger as potentially dangerous.

In the weeks that followed, authorities instructed schools, colleges, and universities throughout the country to organise public screenings of the movie. The video’s 45-minute length was apparently not accidental because it is the duration of a class in secondary school. After the viewings, many educational institutions reported about the event on their websites.

The leading university for teachers, Belarusian State Pedagogical University, wrote(opens in a new tab) that following the movie screening, ‘[T]rainee teachers analysed the reasons which pushed teenagers to become members of a terrorist cell, and discussed their fate.’

Students at the Belarusian State Pedagogical University watching the propaganda movie

The video was also shown to employees of public enterprises. The Minsk Gear Works, a factory known for gear-wheel production, published photos of employees, many in working uniforms, sitting in the assembly hall where the movie was shown. According to the factory’s website(opens in a new tab), the film was ‘food for thought for children and their parents.’ The movie is also meant to target parents of minors. Adults are expected to more tightly control their children’s communications including, or perhaps especially, online communications.

More paranoia about “terrorists”

There appeared more state TV propaganda productions promoting(opens in a new tab) the same paranoid sentiment of ‘growing terrorist cells’. The paranoia seemed to have spread as illustrated in this recent report(opens in a new tab) of KGB arresting three school children doing ordinary chemical experiments but considering them preparing ‘terrorism’.

The increasingly centralised promotion of propaganda across public sector institutions comes as no surprise. This is what Lukashenka explicitly tasked former Minister of Information Vladimir Pertsov to do. Pertsov was recently appointed deputy chief of Lukashenka’s administration. Speaking about the appointment in early April 2024, Lukashenka said(opens in a new tab) that ‘ideological work is coming to the fore’. He also instructed Pertsov to tightly subordinate all ideological and media activities to supporting his rule.

A high church representative to schoolchildren: let Nazism be defeated this year!

Recently, the Exarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) in Belarus has greatly expanded its access to Belarusian minors via public schools. On 7-8 May 2024, authorities instructed schools to show(opens in a new tab) a video address recorded by Fyodor Povnyy, a high-level priest of the ROC-affiliated Belarusian Orthodox Church. Povnyy is known for his regular Sunday sermons on a Belarusian state TV channel where he occasionally includes anti-Western disinformation and propaganda.

A screenshot from Povnyy’s address with Stalin against the background, link(opens in a new tab).

In tune with pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, Povnyy drew parallels in his address between the USSR’s war against Nazi Germany and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine while praising Stalin and Russian soldiers. He said(opens in a new tab), ‘In 2024, we celebrated Easter on 5 May – almost as we did back then [in 1945]. Thank God, now peace is on our land, in Belarus. But a Russian soldier is fighting for our peace, as was the case back then. [He is fighting] for the churches, for his loved ones and for something we call the Motherland’. Povnyy went on to say that Russian soldiers will come to Belarusian schools as hero-teachers, stating(opens in a new tab), ‘Let’s wish them a victory and may Nazism be defeated this year! After the new victory, new heroes will come to your schools to discuss what is the motherland and how to defend it.’

Monastery-run orphanages and Russian history books

The ideological impact of the Russian Orthodox Church over Belarusian minors is poised to increase thanks to recently revised legislation(opens in a new tab) which enables monasteries to set up orphanages. Although the law speaks of ‘monasteries’ generally, there is no doubt that Orthodox establishments will be privileged over others. The very idea of monastery-run orphanages is a Russian practice that Natallya Kachanava, speaker of the parliament (Council of Belarus) and a close associate of Lukashenka, has publicly acknowledged(opens in a new tab) bringing to Belarus.

Beyond the Russian church’s influence over Belarusian schoolchildren, Moscow wields an even stronger tool in the form of mandatory school textbooks. Months earlier, representatives from Russia and the Belarusian regime agreed on common history textbooks for secondary schools and universities. In May 2024, Putin’s advisor Vladimir Medinsky, a former Russian minister of culture and co-chair of the Russia-Belarus Historical Commission, stated(opens in a new tab) that the teaching of history in all types of educational institutions in Belarus and Russia should be aligned. This trend opens the gates for Russkiy Mir ideology to enter the school curricula of Belarusian schoolchildren and students. Medinsky also edited the much discussed new history books for Russian schools – see our article.

A new foundation to support ‘military and patriotic clubs’

As we previously reported in more detail, since 2021, Belarusian authorities have established dozens of so-called ‘military and patriotic clubs’ for children. These clubs are supervised by the Interior Ministry, the army, and other security forces. They teach children how to shoot, engage in hand-to-hand combat, attack tanks, and provide first aid.

In May 2024, this phenomenon received further institutional development in the form of a ‘charity foundation’ called ‘The Young Guard’. The title is a clear reference to the underground anti-Nazi resistance organisation that existed in the Nazi-occupied Soviet city of Krasnodon, currently the Ukrainian city of Sorokyne, occupied by Russia since April 2014. The newly created foundation is supposed to finance (opens in a new tab)18 ‘military and patriotic clubs’ which function under the supervision of the Ministry of the Interior.

Around the same time, Belarus state TV released(opens in a new tab) a propaganda video featuring these ‘military and patriotic clubs’ prepared by the Interior Ministry’s press service. The 10-minute movie demonstrates the training of minors with arms and unarmed combat fighting. It also refers to such clubs as a ‘school of life’ and a ‘second family’ for children.

A screenshot from the propaganda video, link(opens in a new tab)

The concluding song featured in the video says, ‘We serve our Motherland and flag until the end’.

State interference has increases in the private life of youngsters with the attempts to include total control(opens in a new tab) over school graduation parties, incl. to celebrate them in a more modest manner requested by Lukashenka in spring. The state also determines the lists of songs(opens in a new tab) that were to be played at graduation ceremonies.

The indoctrination of Belarusian youth with pro-Soviet and pro-Russian propaganda is quickly rising in scale and taking new worrying forms. The inclusion of propaganda in their curriculum, the influence of the Orthodox Church in schools and orphanages, and the use of ‘military and patriotic’ clubs are hard evidence of an ambition to further control the thoughts of Belarusian citizens.

RIP
Japanese ‘Beat Poet’ Kazuko Shiraishi Dies at 93

“I have never been anything like pink,” Shiraishi wrote in her poem.

Kazuko Shiraishi on Dec. 9, 1981.Paul Wright—Fairfax Media/Getty Images


BY YURI KAGEYAMA / AP
JUNE 19, 2024


TOKYO — Kazuko Shiraishi, a leading name in modern Japanese “beat” poetry, known for her dramatic readings, at times with jazz music, has died. She was 93.

Shiraishi, whom American poet and translator Kenneth Rexroth dubbed “the Allen Ginsberg of Japan,” died of heart failure on June 14, Shichosha, a Tokyo publisher of her works, said Wednesday.

Shiraishi shot to fame when she was just 20, freshly graduated from Waseda University in Tokyo, with her “Tamago no Furu Machi,” translated as “The Town that Rains Eggs”—a surrealist portrayal of Japan’s wartime destruction.

With her trademark long black hair and theatrical delivery, she defied historical stereotypes of the silent, non-assertive Japanese woman.

“I have never been anything like pink,” Shiraishi wrote in her poem.

It ends: “The road / where the child became a girl / and finally heads for dawn / is broken.”

Shiraishi counted Joan Miro, Salvador Dali and John Coltrane among her influences. She was a pioneer in performance poetry, featured at poetry festivals around the world. She read her works with the music of jazz greats like Sam Rivers and Buster Williams, and even a free-verse homage to the spirit of Coltrane.


Born in Vancouver, Canada, she moved back to Japan as a child. While a teen, she joined an avant-garde poetry group.

Shiraishi’s personality and poems, which were sometimes bizarre or erotic, defied Japan’s historical rule-bound forms of literature like haiku and tanka, instead taking a modern, unexplored path.

Rexroth was instrumental in getting Shiraishi’s works translated into English, including collections such as “My Floating Mother, City” in 2009 and “Seasons of Sacred Lust” in 1978.

Over the years, her work has been widely translated into dozens of languages. She was also a translator of literature, including works by Ginsberg.

In 1973, Paul Engle invited her to spend a year as a guest writer at the International Writing Program at the University of Iowa, an experience that broadened her artistic scope and helped her gain her poetic voice.

“In the poems of Kazuko Shiraishi, East and West connect and unite fortuitously,” wrote German writer Gunter Kunert. “It refutes Kipling’s dictum that East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet. In Kazuko Shiraishi’s poems this meeting has already happened.”

A private funeral among family has been held while memorial service is being planned. She is survived by her husband Nobuhiko Hishinuma and a daughter.

 

‘Israel’ Takes Measures in Response to Recognizing Palestine

‘Israel’ is mulling various measures, including enhancing illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, in response to several nations recently recognizing Palestine as a state.

In a statement released late on Sunday, the Israeli prime minister’s office disclosed that the Security Cabinet deliberated on actions to “strengthen settlement in the West Bank in reaction to unilateral recognitions of a Palestinian state, alongside considering responses to the Palestinian Authority’s activities against ‘Israel’ in international forums.

The statement noted that the Israeli war minister and the attorney general have requested additional time to review certain proposed clauses. Netanyahu has instructed that all proposals be put to a vote during the forthcoming Security Cabinet meeting.

Under international law, all settlements in the occupied Palestinian occupied territories are deemed illegal.

Spain, along with Ireland and Norway, officially recognized Palestine as a state effective 28th May, with Slovenia following suit early in June.

Since then, local health authorities reported that nearly 37,300 Palestinians, predominantly women and children, have been killed in Gaza, with more than 85,000 others sustaining injuries.

After over eight months of war, vast expanses of Gaza lie in ruins amid severe blockades on essential supplies like food, water, and medicine.

‘Israel’ faces accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), where a recent ruling has mandated Tel Aviv to immediately cease operations in Rafah, a southern city where over a million Palestinians sought refuge before it was invaded on 6th May.
The case was initiated by South Africa, with Palestinian authorities seeking to participate in its proceedings as a party.



US should be withholding military aid to Israel: Senator

United States should be using leverage to demand an end to Gaza war, says Bernie Sanders

Diyar Guldogan |19.06.2024 - TRT/AA



WASHINGTON

The US should be withholding military aid to Israel in its ongoing war in the Gaza Strip, Senator Bernie Sanders said Tuesday.

"The United States should be withholding all offensive military aid to Israel and using our leverage to demand an end to this war, the unfettered flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza, a stop to the killing of Palestinians in the West Bank and initial steps towards a two-state solution," Sanders said in a statement.

His remarks came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that the US is withholding weapons to Israel.

Netanyahu said that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken assured him that the Biden administration is working to cancel restrictions on arms deliveries to Israel for a war that has killed or injured well over 100,000 people.

The Israeli premier said when Blinken was recently in Israel, they had a "candid conversation." "But I also said something else: I said it’s inconceivable that in the past few months, the administration has been withholding weapons and ammunition to Israel," Netanyahu said in an English language video.

"No doubt, we will hear similar complaints when he addresses Congress on July 24," Sanders said, reiterating that it is "absurd" that Netanyahu was invited to address lawmakers.

Sanders already said that he will not attend "war criminal" Netanyahu's speech.

Israel, which has flouted a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire, has faced international condemnation amid its continued brutal offensive on Gaza since an Oct. 7, 2023 attack by the Palestinian group Hamas.

More than 37,350 Palestinians have since been killed in Gaza, most of them women and children, and over 85,400 others injured, according to local health authorities.

Over eight months into the Israeli war, vast tracts of Gaza lie in ruins amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine.

Israel stands accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice, whose latest ruling ordered it to immediately halt its operation in the southern city of Rafah, where over a million Palestinians had sought refuge from the war before it was invaded on May 6.




 

UN: Israel’s War Causes Major Environmental Damage

UN issued a report on Tuesday showing the scale of damages Israel’s war on Gaza has impacted the environmental arena.

Israel’s war on Gaza has created unprecedented soil, water and air pollution, destroyed sanitation systems and left tons of debris from explosive devices, according to a UN report.
The war has reversed limited progress in improving Gaza’s water desalination and wastewater treatment facilities, restoring the Wadi Gaza coastal wetland, and investments in solar power installations, according to a preliminary assessment by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) reported by Reuters.

UNEP assessed the environmental damage following a request by the Palestinian Environment Quality Authority in December.
The report found that explosive weapons had generated 39 million tons of debris, with each square metre in Gaza littered with over 107kg of debris.

“All of this is deeply harming people’s health, food security and Gaza’s resilience,” said Inger Andersen, UNEP’s executive director.

The report found that water, sanitation, and hygiene systems were effectively defunct, with Gaza’s five wastewater treatment plants shut down.

Before the war, Israel’s 17-year siege on Gaza had already posed serious environmental and health challenges related to the availability of clean water.

More than 92 percent of water in the enclave has been deemed unfit for human consumption.

The Gaza Strip had one of the highest densities of rooftop solar panels in the world, with an estimated 12,400 rooftop solar systems recorded in 2023. But Israel’s war has destroyed most of the solar infrastructure.
Destroyed solar panels can result in metal contaminants leaking into the soil, according to Reuters.


Rwandan President Kagame accuses West of double standards on democracy

WHERE THE UK WANTS TO SEND ITS REFUGEES


The East African
WEDNESDAY JUNE 19 2024


Rwanda's President Paul Kagame talks during an interview in Kigali, Rwanda

By XINHUA
More by this Author


Rwandan President Paul Kagame on Monday accused Western countries of adopting “double standards” on democracy, ahead of next month’s general elections in the country.

Mr Kagame, who has been President of Rwanda since 2000, was responding to a question about critics who accuse him of clinging to power.

Read: Kagame likely to join club of ‘power clingers’

“Democracy is about freedom of choice. If that is the case unless the definition has changed over time, I have never known of any place where democracy has succeeded when principles and ideals have been dictated from the outside,” Mr Kagame said, speaking in an interview on national television.

“They say you have been there too long, but that is none of their business ... Rwandans are the ones to make those choices. They have the freedom to do it. But you find that in most cases, the complaints are from outside. These are double standards; it’s even arrogance,” he said.

President Kagame’s comments came days after the country’s National Electoral Commission cleared him and two other candidates to run in the presidential election next month.

Related



Read: At least 9.5m people to vote in Rwanda elections

Mr Kagame is a candidate of the ruling Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF). His two challengers are Frank Habineza of the opposition Democratic Green Party of Rwanda, and Philippe Mpayimana, an independent candidate.

President Kagame pointed out that the political context of every country matters in politics, adding that lines of thinking are going to be different from one place to another, wondering whether the democracy being practised in Rwanda is the opposite of the description of democracy.

“Some of these countries have strict rules, and they don’t want anybody to interfere in their politics, but they find it easy to get involved in other people’s politics. What sense does it make?”

”If interfering in other people’s affairs is wrong, what gives you the right to go and get involved in other people’s affairs ... Some of them are leaders of their own countries in spite of their very low ratings. But that is democracy I’m told,” he added.

Rwandans will go to the polls to elect the president and members of parliament on July 15.
Noam Chomsky’s wife denies reports famed linguist and Israel critic died in Brazil

Prominent activist, 95, had been hospitalized while recovering from a stroke suffered a year ago, Valeria Chomsky says, as false reports of his death spread on social media


By AGENCIES and TOI STAFF
Today

File - US linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky is pictured during a press conference in Curitiba, Brazil, on September 20, 2018. (Heuler Andrey / AFP)

Noam Chomsky’s wife on Tuesday denied reports that the famed linguist and Israel critic had died.
“No, it is false,” Valeria Wasserman Chomsky wrote in response to an emailed query from The Associated Press.

Noam Chomsky, 95, had been hospitalized in Brazil while recovering from a stroke suffered a year ago, Valeria Chomsky told the AP last week.

The Beneficencia Portuguesa hospital in Sao Paulo said in a statement that Chomsky was discharged on Tuesday to continue his treatment at home.

The newspaper Folha de Sao Paulo reported that Chomsky was recently hospitalized after a stroke a year ago left him with difficulty to speak and move the right side of his body.

Earlier Tuesday, Chomsky was trending on X as false reports of his death abounded. Jacobin and The New Statesman published obituaries for Chomsky, though the former changed its headline from “We Remember Noam Chomsky” to “Let’s Celebrate Noam Chomsky.” The New Statesman took its essay by former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis down altogether. Brazilian news site Diario do Centro do Mundo also took down its story announcing Chomsky’s death and issued a correction.


File – Gaza psychiatrist and prominent Palestinian human rights campaigner Dr. Eyad Sarraj, left, listens to Jewish-American scholar and activist Noam Chomsky, right, during a meeting with Palestinian youth activists at Almathaf hotel in Gaza City, October 19, 2012. (photo credit: AP/Adel Hana)

The Chomskys have had a residence in Brazil since 2015.

Noam Chomsky became an outspoken left-wing activist on an array of issues from US intervention in Vietnam to labor rights and the environment. He is a fierce critic of the United States government and of Israel, which banned him in 2010.

Known to millions for his criticisms of US foreign policy, Chomsky taught for decades at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In 2017, he joined the College of Social & Behavioral Sciences at the University of Arizona in Tucson.

He first became known in the 1950s with the revolutionary theory that the ability to form structured language was innate.
Australian opposition puts nation’s first nuclear power plants in its energy plan ahead of elections


Opposition Leader Peter Dutton unveils details of proposed nuclear energy plan as Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor, left, looks on during a press conference at the Commonwealth Parliamentary Offices in Sydney, Wednesday, June 19, 2024. Australia’s main opposition party has announced plans to build Australia’s first nuclear power plants by 2037, arguing the government’s policies for decarbonizing the economy with renewable energy sources including solar, wind turbines and green hydrogen would not work. (Bianca De Marchi/AAP Image via AP)Read More

 Liddell Power Station A coal-powered thermal power stations near Muswellbrook in the Hunter Valley, Australia, on Nov. 2, 2021. Australia’s main opposition party has announced, Wednesday, June 19, 2024, plans to build Australia’s first nuclear power plants by 2037, arguing the government’s policies for decarbonizing the economy with renewable energy sources including solar, wind turbines and green hydrogen would not work. (AP Photo/Mark Baker, File)

Power lines lead from the Liddell Power Station, a coal-powered thermal power station near Muswellbrook in the Hunter Valley, Australia on Nov. 2, 2021. Australia’s main opposition party has announced, Wednesday, June 19, 2024, plans to build Australia’s first nuclear power plants by 2037, arguing the government’s policies for decarbonizing the economy with renewable energy sources including solar, wind turbines and green hydrogen would not work. (AP Photo/Mark Baker, File)

BY ROD MCGUIRK
 June 18, 2024


MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Australia’s main opposition party on Wednesday announced plans to build Australia’s first nuclear power plants as early as 2035, arguing the government’s policies for decarbonizing the economy with renewable energy sources including solar, wind turbines and green hydrogen would not work.

The policy announcement ensures the major parties will be divided on how Australia curbs its greenhouse gas emissions at elections due within a year. The parties haven’t gone to an election with the same carbon reduction policies since 2007.

“I’m very happy for the election to be a referendum on energy, on nuclear, on power prices, on lights going out, on who has a sustainable pathway for our country going forward,” opposition leader Peter Dutton told reporters.

Seven government-owned reactors would be built on the sites of aging coal-fired electricity plants in five of Australia’s six states, Dutton said. The first two would be built from 2035-to-2037 and the last in the 2040s. The estimated costs would be announced at a later date, he said.

The current center-left government has rejected nuclear power generation in Australia as too expensive. Too many coal-fired generators would have been decommissioned before nuclear power could fill the gap.


Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen accused the conservative opposition Liberal Party of serving Australia’s influential coal and gas industry lobbies.

“It’s not really an announcement. We know that Mr. Dutton wants to slow down the rollout of renewables and he wants to introduce the most expensive form of energy that’s slow to build,” Bowen told reporters.

“But today, we’ve seen no costs, we’ve seen no gigawatts, we’ve seen no detail. This is a joke. It’s a serious joke because it threatens our transition” from fossil fuels, Bowen added.

Bowen’s Labor Party came to power in the 2022 elections promising deeper cuts to Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 than the previous coalition government had committed to.

The previous Liberal Party-led government promised to reduce emissions by between 26% and 28% below 2005 levels by the end of the decade.

Labor promised a 43% reduction and the Parliament enshrined that target in law, creating difficulties for any future government that wanted to reduce it and offering certainty for investors.

Dutton has ruled out announcing a new 2030 target before the next election. But the major parties have agreed on a net-zero emissions target by 2050.

Dutton said Labor could not reach its 2030 target with a policy toward relying solely on renewable energy.

A Liberal Party-led government would use nuclear power, renewable energy sources and “significant amounts of gas,” Dutton said.

“I want to make sure that the Australian public understands today that we have a vision for our country to deliver cleaner electricity, cheaper electricity and consistent electricity,” Dutton said.

Australia has historically been one of the world’s worst greenhouse gas emitters on a per capita basis because of its heavy reliance on abundant reserves of cheap coal and gas.

Constant conflict between the major parties over the past 17 years on how to reduce emissions led to a carbon tax introduced by a Labor Party government in 2012 being repealed by a Liberal Party-led government in 2014.

Australia’s only reactor has produced nuclear isotopes for medical use in the Sydney suburb of Lucas Heights since 1958.

Dutton said the country could only now consider introducing atomic power generation because the major parties had agreed in 2019 to the AUKUS partnership with the United States and Britain which will deliver Australia a fleet of submarines powered by U.S. nuclear technology.


Nuclear subs, nuclear  power … could nuclear  weapons be next?

The Australian public has shown a willingness to go along with what was once unthinkable.


Peter Dutton will be be asked to fill in the details of his nuclear power plan (Getty Images)

LOWY INSTITUTE
Published 19 Jun 2024

Opposition leader Peter Dutton has today nominated seven sites where he says a future Coalition government would construct nuclear power plants. For the benefit of international readers, this would be huge shift for Australia, which presently has no nuclear energy production.

Dutton has framed the policy as a response to climate change, seeking to exploit doubts about the reliability of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. Dutton’s move has been cast in media commentary as restarting the “climate wars”.

“I’m very happy for the election to be a referendum on energy,” Dutton says.

AUKUS was a stepping stone that has led Dutton to this next stage.

Three years ago, Scott Morrison unveiled the nuclear-powered submarine plan. It’s easy to forget what a shock this involved. The idea was previously unthinkable. But Morrison dragged the nation across the Rubicon, and Labor, then in opposition, quickly jumped aboard.

Morrison had actually flirted with the dream of a nuclear-power industry at the time of negotiating the submarine deal, according to a recent report in The Australian, which observed that “the politics of securing AUKUS and a domestic nuclear energy program simultaneously would have been overly ambitious.”

But AUKUS was a stepping stone that has led Dutton to this next stage. And he looks to have read the public mood. The Lowy Institute Poll this month found 61% support either strongly (27%) or somewhat (34%) for “Australia using nuclear power to generate electricity, alongside other sources of energy”. On the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines, almost two-thirds of Australians remain in favour.

These are remarkable results compared to where Australia has come from. Only a few decades ago, more than 250,000 Australians protested on the streets over nuclear issues. Opposition to uranium mining was the activist issue of choice. The disarmament movement had enough support to elect senators. France’s nuclear testing in the Pacific sparked an outcry that forced to government to recall the Australian ambassador in Paris. Debate over uranium sales to India split the Labor party.

A major deterioration in regional security coupled with nationalist sentiment could become powerful drivers.

So, with the nation adapting to uncertain times by proposing polices once thought impossible, what about the next step? Should Australia complement its nuclear power industry and nuclear-powered submarines with an arsenal of nuclear weapons? Australia has had atomic ambitions before.

Public support appears tepid. In 2022, after the AUKUS plans had been unveiled, the Lowy Institute Poll reported 36% of Australians in favour of acquiring nuclear weapons in the future. Still, that was higher than the 16% in favour in 2010, when Australians were asked if they would support developing nuclear weapons should near neighbours do the same. Attitudes can shift. Asked in 2011 whether they favoured Australia building nuclear power plants as part of its plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions, only 35% agreed.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton (Lisa Maree Williams/Getty Images)

Big international shocks might encourage more Australians to support the development nuclear weapons. Vladimir Putin making good on threats to unleash a nuclear strike over the invasion of Ukraine, for example. Or an act of naked aggression by China.

Australians might also want to follow should partners take concrete steps. Japan is one country that is already assumed to have a latent nuclear weapons capability, a “bomb in the basement”, with the technical know-how of a full nuclear fuel cycle. South Korea’s President Yoon Suk-yeol warned in January that threats from North Korea might drive him to seek tactical nuclear weapons “if the problem becomes more serious”.

And while a nuclear-armed Australia would complicate relations with neighbours, particularly Indonesia and the Pacific, a major deterioration in regional security coupled with nationalist sentiment could become powerful drivers.

The question of cost is confronting. Building and maintaining nuclear weapons requires immense expenditure. It would be a massive investment, technically challenging, and run afoul of Australia’s international commitments. These are all the same reasons people have for so long dismissed the idea of Australia obtaining nuclear-powered submarines.

You can start to see the way a political argument in favour of nuclear weapons could be made. Strategic dangers are swirling. China is rapidly expanding its nuclear stockpile. The nuclear non-proliferation treaty signed in the 1960s is outmoded, much as was the argument when effectively exempting India over its nuclear weapons program.

Dutton, to be clear, is talking nuclear power, not weapons. But given the upheaval of recent times, who could confidently say never? Australia’s nuclear politics have dramatically changed.







One year of Nijjar killing: Canada Parliament observes silence, Trudeau hopes to improve India ties

Canadian PM hopes that talks with India can resume on 'some very serious issues'

Web Desk Updated: June 19, 2024 
Canada's House of Commons holds moment of silence to mark the one-year anniversary of Hardeep Singh Nijjar's killing | Video screenshot/YouTub

The Canadian House of Commons on Tuesday held a moment of silence to mark the one-year anniversary of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar's assassination.

This comes as Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau spoke to CBC News, saying he hopes that talks with India can resume on "some very serious issues around national security and keeping Canadians safe and the rule of law" as Narendra Modi has been election for a third term.

"There's alignment on a number of big issues that we need to work on, as democracies (and) as a global community," Trudeau told the outlet. "But now that he (Modi) is through his election, I think there is an opportunity for us to engage, including on some very serious issues around national security and keeping Canadians safe and the rule of law that we will be engaging."

Nijjar who headed the Khalistan Tiger Force was killed by unidentified people outside a gurudwara in British Columbia's Surrey on June 18, 2023. He was designated a terrorist by the Indian government over separatist activities.

The Canadian police have arrested four Indians including Amandeep Singh, Karanpreet Singh, Kamalpreet Singh and Karan Brar in connection with the killing. However, the Indian government has denied any involvement in the killing, terming the allegations as "absurd" and "motivated".

The assassination of Nijjar has caused rift in the India-Canada bilateral relationship last year.

The one-year anniversary of Nijjar's killing comes after Modi met Trudeau on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Italy last week.