Friday, August 22, 2025

Can you prove to Trump you’re not anti? 
An (absurd) immigration checklist  























"McCarthyism returns to immigration law," 

Opinion
the Miami Herald Editorial Board
Wed, August 20, 2025 

New guidelines by the Trump administration will require applicants for immigration benefits to be screened for anti-American ideologies.


The Trump administration’s announcement Wednesday that immigrants applying for U.S. citizenship and other benefits will be screened to determine whether they have displayed anti-American ideas or behavior is problematic to say the least. Who gets to decide what exactly is anti-American?

And that got us thinking. If U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents are the ones deciding whether you stay or go, what will they be considering?

Is the applicant’s social media free of rainbows? Come on in. Do they have preferred pronouns? The exit is that way. What about the person’s car — is it (more or less) American made? A positive sign.

Yes, this is a serious matter. But measuring anti-American-ness? That’s a joke. U.S. immigration officers have always used their discretion to award citizenship and other benefits to people born outside the country. It’s unclear what will actually change under the updated immigration policy manual, though “Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis,” U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services wrote in a Tuesday news release.

The guidelines target “anti-American ideologies” but don’t describe what they are, which is the problem. That will be in the eyes of the beholder — and the beholder being the Trump administration, we can imagine how that might turn out.

Given that the new guidance also includes “social media vetting,” we encourage officers to print out the following checklist, which we’re sure will please the president and his top aide/anti-immigration zealot Stephen Miller:

Does this future patriot drive a truck that does no more than 5 mpg of beautiful fossil fuel? Approve.


Did the wannabe American show up to the immigration interview in a Prius or electrical vehicle? (Please consult your supervisor regarding the status of Tesla, as the president and Elon Musk may still patch things up.) Deny. Send applicants straight to Alligator Alcatraz if they rode a bike, because this is America, not Europe.

Was the future model citizen spotted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021? Approve.

Has this ungrateful person posted anything complaining about the cost of groceries since Jan. 20, 2025 — because “inflation is down to a perfect, beautiful number,” the president has to constantly remind us? Deny.


Does this soon-to-be great American thank the president every day for protecting us from mail ballots, windmills, foreign invaders and paper straws? Approve — immediately.


With this list, USCIS officers will be sure to ensure that whoever is allowed in the country has pledged their allegiance not only to America but to a particular ideology that the president has decided is the only one acceptable. Whoever disagrees should not be granted the privilege of American citizenship, does not belong in the Smithsonian museums or in the federal government, especially if they will produce any jobs reports that make Trump’s economy look bad.

And if you find the above list absurd, it’s because it is meant to be. These are, in fact, absurd times.


U.S. to probe "anti-American" views of those applying for immigration benefits

Camilo Montoya-Galvez
Wed, August 20, 2025
CBS




The Trump administration has directed government officials to probe any "anti-American" views and activities of immigrants applying for immigration benefits like green cards and work permits, further expanding the grounds that can be cited to deny those applications.

The policy unveiled on Tuesday by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is the latest front in a broader Trump administration effort to restrict access to legal immigration benefits, including by broadening the levels of scrutiny and vetting to which applicants are subjected.

The guidance issued this week directs officials at USCIS to determine whether applicants for certain immigration benefits have "endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused anti-American views or the views of a terrorist organization or group," including on social media. USCIS said those groups could include organizations that espouse or promote antisemitic views and terrorism.

If officials find applicants have any ties to these groups or share their views, the directive instructs the officials to consider that an "overwhelmingly negative factor" justifying the denial of an application.

The policy will affect requests for immigration benefits that are discretionary, meaning that USCIS can deny them even if applicants meet the qualifications outlined in U.S. law. Those cases include many applications for permanent U.S. residency (also known as a green card), work permits and status changes for foreign students.

While it wasn't immediately clear how expansively USCIS will define "anti-American" views and activities, the agency said it would make the determination based on a provision of U.S. immigration law that bans immigrants from becoming U.S. citizens if it is found that they advocate for world communism, totalitarianism, violence against officials or the overthrow of the U.S. government.

The guidance issued Tuesday also orders USCIS officials to probe whether applicants improperly used an immigration policy known as parole to enter the U.S. In the immigration context, parole allows for the arrival of immigrants who are otherwise ineligible to enter the U.S. It was used by the Biden administration on an unprecedented scale, mainly to ease pressure at the U.S.-Mexico border by offering migrants a legal way to enter the country.

USCIS said it would look into whether applicants' parole applications contained "false or fraudulent" information.

Matthew Tragesser, USCIS' top spokesperson, said Tuesday's memo underscored that U.S. immigration benefits should not be granted to people who "despise the country."

"U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible," Tragesser added.

Stephen Yale-Loehr, an expert in U.S. immigration law, expressed concerns about how USCIS would implement its latest guidance, calling the language in it "very subjective."

"This memo gives USCIS adjudicators even more reasons than before to deny a petition on discretionary grounds," Yale-Loehr said.

While President Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration central to his second-term agenda, his administration has also tightened access to the legal immigration system.

Last week, USCIS said it would expand a "good moral character" assessment in the U.S. citizenship process. That requirement was historically satisfied when applicants lacked serious criminal histories or disqualifying conduct on their record. But now, officials have been instructed to weigh different positive factors, like applicants' involvement in the community, and negative factors, like repeat traffic infractions, to determine whether someone has good moral character.

The Trump administration also previously announced measures to more aggressively screen those applying for a U.S. immigration status, including by placing a greater emphasis on the social media activity of applicants.

Trump administration to vet legal immigrant applicants for 'anti-Americanism' and antisemitism


Michael Dorgan
Wed, August 20, 2025
FOX NEWS


Trump administration to vet legal immigrant applicants for 'anti-Americanism' and antisemitism
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways


Federal officials are now being instructed to vet immigrants looking to legally live and work in the U.S. for "anti-American," terrorist, or antisemitic views under new guidance.

The updated policy, part of President Donald Trump’s broader immigration clampdown, gives U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers broad discretion to treat such views as "overwhelmingly negative factors" when deciding whether to approve green cards, visas or citizenship. The guidance took effect immediately and applies to both new and pending applications.

"America’s benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser said.

Federal officials are now being instructed to vet immigrants looking to legally live and work in the U.S. for "anti-American," terrorist, or antisemitic views under new guidance.

He added that USCIS is committed to implementing policies that root out anti-Americanism and strengthen vetting.

"Immigration benefits — including to live and work in the United States — remain a privilege, not a right."

While the release offered no clear definition of "anti-Americanism," USCIS referenced the Immigration and Nationality Act, which prohibits people linked to terrorism, antisemitism or "world communism" from gaining citizenship.

It noted that officers, when conducting a discretionary analysis, will weigh whether an applicant’s requests were made in line with existing laws and policies.

The change comes alongside a wave of new immigration measures in Trump’s second term, including expanded social media vetting and a tougher "good moral character" standard for naturalization.

USCIS said reviews of anti-American activity will now be folded into social media screenings.


New U.S. citizens listen as U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken delivers remarks during a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services naturalization ceremony inside the Robert N.C. Nix Federal Courthouse on Oct. 19, 2022 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Federal officials are now being instructed to vet immigrants looking to legally live and work in the U.S. for "anti-American," terrorist, or antisemitic views under new guidance.

Trump Is Targeting Nonviolent And Legal Immigrants. americans Are Starting To Notice

"The message is that the U.S. and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions," Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday.

Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. "The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion," she said.

But Ruby Robinson of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center argued constitutional rights apply to all people in the U.S. regardless of status — and predicted legal challenges.

"A lot of this administration’s activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts," Robinson added.

Critics like David J. Bier, the director of immigration policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, warned the policy could be wielded to silence dissent and punish political opponents.

"This is a new powerful weapon in President Trump’s arsenal against politically disfavored groups," Bier told the Washington Post.

Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy fits Trump’s longstanding approach and that the administration is within its authority.

"This is what was elected. They’re allowed to interpret the rules the way they want," Grode told the Washington Post. "The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Trump administration to screen immigrants for 'anti-Americanism'

Ja'han Jones
Wed, August 20, 2025
MSNBC



A new citizen holds an American flag during a naturalization ceremony in Metheun, Mass., in 2024. (David L. Ryan / Boston Globe via Getty Images)

The Trump administration is planning to roll out a new screening process to prevent people from working or gaining citizenship in the United States if they purportedly express what officials generally describe as "anti-Americanism."

Unlike the administration’s disturbing plans to create a new layer of screening to make sure naturalized citizens exhibit "good moral character" — a trait most Americans don’t even seem to think the president possesses, according to a recent poll — the new "anti-Americanism" screening will apply both to aspiring citizens and anyone seeking a green card to work in the United States.

As The Associated Press reports:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as a green card, “endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused” anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. “America’s benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,” Matthew Tragesser, USCIS spokesman, said in a statement. “Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right.” It isn’t specified what constitutes anti-Americanism and it isn’t clear how and when the directive would be applied.

As I reported last week, the head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is Joseph Edlow, who in a recent Breitbart interview advanced the central tenets of the "great replacement" conspiracy theory, which posits that a liberal cabal is attempting to replace white Americans with nonwhite people through immigration, interracial marriage and, eventually, violence. It's a racist theory that has motivated numerous mass murderers.

Now, Edlow’s job will reportedly include overseeing an agency that will screen immigrants’ supposed Americanness to determine whether they are worthy of working in the country or earning citizenship — with little or no official guidance on how these decisions should be made.

Jane Lilly Lopez, an associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University, told the AP the move is “opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel.”

In a social media post, Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a former immigration lawyer and now a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group, denounced the new screening as a return of “McCarthyism” to U.S. immigration law, comparing the new screenings to the crusade to root out purported communists led by Sen. Joseph McCarthy, R-Wis., in the 1950s.

“McCarthyism returns to immigration law, as @USCIS announces that it will begin screening applicants for immigration benefits for ‘Anti-America ideologies or activities.’" he wrote. “The term has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin.”

The move comes as the Trump administration has sought to police expression and impose its worldview in other ways, whether through attempts to whitewash Smithsonian museum exhibits and or exert more control over what is taught at American colleges and universities.

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Trump administration to vet immigration applications for 'anti-Americanism'

Kanishka Singh
Wed, August 20, 2025


Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) naturalization ceremony in New York City

By Kanishka Singh

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's administration has said it will assess applicants for U.S. work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them, sparking concern about implications for free speech.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a "policy alert" dated Tuesday that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism."

Trump has labeled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting U.S. slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza.

"Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said.

"America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies."

The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalization of people "opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government."

The full text mentions supporters of communism or totalitarian regimes and people who advocate overthrow of the U.S. government and violence against government officers, among other factors.

USCIS said it expanded the types of applications that have social media vetting, and reviews for "anti-American activity" will be added to that vetting.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step hearkened to the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution.

"McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin."


In April, the U.S. government said it would begin screening the social media of immigrants and visa applicants for what it called antisemitic activity. Rights advocates raised free speech and surveillance concerns.

(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)









THE WORST OF THE WORST

BREAKING: Trump administration immediately pausing all new commercial truck driver work visas

Thomas Wasson
Thu, August 21, 2025 
/FreightWaves


(Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

The Trump administration announced Thursday night that it has issued an immediate pause on the issuance of worker visas for commercial truck drivers.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a post on X, “The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers.”

Under current regulations, a foreign driver may obtain a U.S. commercial driver’s license but must have an employment authorization document.

Such documents include the temporary H-2B visa, which allows U.S. companies to hire foreign workers for temporary, seasonal or nonagricultural jobs. They are valid for up to nine months and require the company to demonstrate a labor shortage or the inability to hire a qualified U.S. worker.

Another option is permanent residency via an EB-3 visa, which is used to sponsor foreign drivers for permanent, long-term positions and provides a pathway to a green card. The permanent resident card, more commonly known as a green card, allows the individual to work permanently in the U.S. and is valid for 10 years.

The Trump administration’s recent moves targeting commercial driver work visas appear to be in reaction to headlines involving a fatal semitruck crash in Florida that killed three people.

Following the accident, Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced Tuesday that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is investigating both the driver and White Hawk Carrier, the motor carrier that was involved.

This is a developing story.
IRONY

Trump administration expands ‘good moral character’ requirement to become naturalized citizen



Michael Williams, 
CNN
Wed, August 20, 2025 


The Trump administration is expanding the requirement for immigrants who are hoping to become US citizens to display “good moral character,” in a move that some immigration lawyers denounced as a troubling change that adds uncertainty to the naturalization process.

US Citizenship and Immigration Services, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security that administers the country’s legal immigration system, directed its officers in a memo last week to more heavily consider both positive and negative “attributes or contributions” of people going through the naturalization process to become US citizens.

The memo, which was sent to USCIS officers on Friday, requires them to take a more “holistic approach in evaluating whether or not an alien seeking naturalization has affirmatively established that he or she has met their burden of establishing that they are worthy of assuming the rights and responsibilities of United States Citizenship.”

The agency said in a statement that the new policy is intended to ensure its officers are accounting more heavily for an immigrant’s positive attributes, rather than simply the “absence of misconduct,” to reflect their character.

“U.S. citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship—it should only be offered to the world’s best of the best,” USCIS spokesperson Matthew J. Tragesser said in a statement.

The standard to show good moral character has long been part of the naturalization process in the US. But immigration attorneys told CNN that the memo is designed in a way that places additional burdens on people going through the process.

Emily Ryo, a professor of law and sociology at Duke University whose research focuses on immigration, said the “mandate is likely to introduce a great deal of uncertainty, unpredictability, and administrative burden.”

“What does it mean to require that a noncitizen ‘affirmatively’ establish that they are ‘worthy’ of US citizenship?” Ryo said in an email. “What kind of documentation will noncitizens be required to provide to make this affirmative showing, and how exactly are the officials to weigh and verify such evidence?”

Susan Ramos, an immigration attorney based in Arizona, described the policy change as “troubling” and said it “appears to effectively change the substantive requirements for naturalization without notice and comment, just by policy.”

“It creates a new subjective standard without providing the analysis that will be performed in adjudicating an application for naturalization,” Ramos said. “For example, how much volunteer work is enough to tip the scales in favor of the applicant? Who decides that formula, and using what analysis? What will USCIS consider sufficient achievement for someone who doesn’t work?”

And because the directive is broadly written, it makes it more difficult to challenge an individual officer’s decision on whether the character standard has been met, said Kathrin Mautino, a California-based immigration attorney.


“Generally, it will give individual officers more authority to ask about private lives,” Mautino said.

But the memo does contain some more concrete and stringent requirements for potential new citizens.

Previously, immigrants who owed overdue taxes were required to only show they were participating in a payment plan with the IRS to meet the character standard, Mautino said. But the new memo now requires the “full payment” of overdue taxes, as well as other obligations including child-support payments.

USCIS said in the memo this is to make sure immigrants “who have engaged in wrongdoing are properly rehabilitated and reformed.”

People who have multiple traffic tickets can now be found to lack good moral character, as well as people who engage in “harassment or aggressive solicitation,” though it is not clear what the memo means by that.

The updated policy is just one way the Trump administration is more heavily scrutinizing the lives of people applying for citizenship or for the right to live, work or study in the United States.

In late May, the US State Department ordered embassies to pause visa interviews for international students so they could more heavily scrutinize students’ social media. The pause was lifted after the State Department told embassies to screen for “hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.”

On Tuesday, USCIS announced that type of vetting will expand to seek out “anti-American” attitudes in those seeking immigration-related benefits such as the right to live or work in the US.



Trump Administration Gives Federal Officers More Leeway To Reject Citizenship Applications

Li Zhou
Wed, August 20, 2025 
HUFFPOST

New guidance from the Trump administration gives federal officers more leeway to reject citizenship applications on the basis of individuals lacking “good moral character.”

That criteria, which has long been a part of citizenship evaluations, has typically been satisfied if a person doesn’t have a history of violence or unlawful conduct, CBS News’ Camilo Montoya-Galvez reports. Following a Friday memo from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, however, officers have been directed to take a “holistic” look at what “good moral character” entails, allowing them to flag applications for a much wider swath of reasons.

Related: Trump Shows Off His ‘4 MORE YEARS’ Hat To Zelenskyy During Baffling White House Detour

Those include whether a person has sufficient “positive attributes and contributions” such as involvement in the community, employment history and educational attainment. And they also include whether an individual has a history of lesser offenses like repeated traffic infractions or a pattern of other “acts that are contrary to the average behavior of citizens in the jurisdiction where aliens reside.”

“Going forward, USCIS officers must account for an alien’s positive attributes and not simply the absence of misconduct,” the memo reads.

This approach means that people could theoretically see their applications denied if officers don’t believe they’ve contributed enough to their communities, or if they take issue with certain past activities.

“This new guidance seems to give more discretion to officers and increase what factors can be relied upon to deny naturalization,”Jean Reisz, a USC law professor and co-director of the university’s Immigration Clinic, tells HuffPost. “Especially in light of how broadly one can interpret ‘contributions’ to the U.S. or what would constitute socially questionable behavior. For example, participating in certain protests could be viewed as socially questionable if it conflicts with an administration’s agenda.”

The agency’s new approach comes as the administration has launched a crackdown on undocumented immigrants and simultaneously sought to restrict pathways to legal immigration. In addition to ramping up deportations of undocumented people, the administration has also revoked visas for students who are in the U.S. lawfully and tried to roll back programs like Temporary Protected Status, which offer legal protections that shield tens of thousands of immigrants from deportation.

Giving officers more grounds to reject citizenship applications only adds to this push.

 Opinion

Here’s One Smithsonian Painting the White House Wants to Censor


Robert McCoy

Escalating its mission to eliminate so-called “woke” content from the Smithsonian, Trump’s team has just publicly identified artwork it hopes to censor.

On Thursday, the White House’s official rapid response X account shared a post casting aspersions on a Rigoberto A. Gonzalez painting titled Refugees Crossing the Border Wall Into South Texas.

The piece depicts a family of four in Baroque style: two parents with a young boy and a baby, at a ladder leaning against the southern border wall. A finalist for the National Portrait Gallery’s 2022 Outwin Boochever Portrait Competition, the piece appeared in that Smithsonian Museum from 2022 to 2023, according to the competition’s website.

The White House social team, seemingly irked by this humanizing portrayal of people demonized by the Trump administration, accused the work of “commemorating the act of illegally crossing the ‘exclusionary’ border.”

“This is what President Trump means when he says the Smithsonian is ‘OUT OF CONTROL,’” the post says—quoting from a recent Truth Social post in which the president lamented that the Smithsonian overemphasizes negative aspects of America, such as “how bad Slavery was.”

In a Thursday press release, the White House listed Gonzalez’s painting with other supposedly damning proof that the institution is in the grip of wokeness, including an American History Museum collection on LGBTQ+ history.


White House targets 'woke' Smithsonian content in new list


Janay Kingsberry, Sophia Nguyen, Maura Judkis
Thu, August 21, 2025
WASHINGTON POST



A view of the Musical Crossroads gallery at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of African American History and Culture in 2016.(Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post) -
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

The White House increased its pressure on the Smithsonian on Thursday, calling out a list of exhibitions and materials mentioning race, slavery, transgender identity and immigration to bolster President Donald Trump’s ongoing criticism that the institution is too focused on divisive and negative aspects of American history.

In an official, unsigned article titled “President Trump Is Right About the Smithsonian,” the White House called out seven museums for their exhibits and messaging — including the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of American History, the National Portrait Gallery and the National Museum of the American Latino.

Representatives for each of the museums named in the article did not respond or directed a request for comment to the central Smithsonian administration, whose spokesperson declined to comment.

“As President Trump promised, the Trump Administration is committed to rooting out Woke and divisive ideology in our government and institutions,” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said in an email. “Taxpayer money should not be used for things that pit Americans against one another. Our Smithsonian should exhibit history in an accurate, honest, and factual way.”

Among the targets of the White House’s list were two museums that have not yet broken ground on buildings — the National Museum of the American Latino and American Women’s History Museum — and works by individual artists.

“In a way I’m kind of honored to be included in this list of important exhibitions and art projects that shed light on many viewpoints and diverse realities that are part of American History,” said artist Hugo Crosthwaite in an email to The Post. Crosthwaite created a portrait, named by the White House, of former National Institutes of Health official Anthony S. Fauci, who “has made a significant impact on the wellness of this country,” he said.

Artist Rigoberto A. González, who had been spending the day painting when a friend texted him the link to the White House website, had similar sentiments about his work being scrutinized: “You know the saying that there’s only good publicity? I’m thinking that maybe somebody will want to buy a painting.”


At the same time, said González, “it reminded me right away of, when you read in our history, about ‘degenerate art’ that the Nazis targeted. I was like, ‘There it is: another sign of where they want to take the country.’”

González submitted a painting of a family crossing a southern U.S. border wall for the Smithsonian’s Outwin Boochever portrait competition. Though the White House website says the Portrait Gallery “features” his painting, which he based on his research at migrant respite centers in South Texas, he noted that it is not on display at the Smithsonian but is held in a private collection.

“It’s not promoting immigration,” he added. “It’s the reality of immigration — and the fact that when immigrants come here, they don’t always find this American Dream that they’re supposedly chasing.”

The White House’s list comes two days after Trump said he would send his attorneys through the museums, adding that the Smithsonian focused too much on “how bad Slavery was.”

In an interview with Fox News on Wednesday, Lindsey Halligan, the White House official charged with examining the Smithsonian, said she had walked through museums and reviewed information on slavery herself.

“The fact that … our country was involved in slavery is awful — no one thinks otherwise,” Halligan said. “But what I saw when I was going through the museums, personally, was an overemphasis on slavery, and I think there should be more of an overemphasis on how far we’ve come since slavery.”

Scholars this week challenged Trump’s framing of the Smithsonian’s work and decried his criticism as an effort to control history.

Samuel Redman, director of the public history program at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and author of “The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience,” told The Post on Wednesday that the president “doesn’t have the requisite legal or political authority to enact these changes unilaterally.”

He noted the Smithsonian has many forward-looking exhibits on subjects including American innovation, and added that because of its deliberate planning, the institution is not generally seen as “this cutting-edge space.”

Beth English, executive director of the Organization of American Historians, called Trump’s comments “executive overreach masquerading as patriotic renewal.”

Some repeat targets were mentioned in Thursday’s list. The White House again singled out “The Shape of Power,” a Smithsonian American Art Museum exhibition that explores how sculpture “has shaped and reflected” concepts of race in the U.S., and how it “has been a powerful tool in promoting scientific racism.” The show was mentioned in Trump’s executive order “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”

As part of the president’s effort to oust Portrait Gallery director Kim Sajet, the White House issued a list of 17 examples of the museum’s alleged partisanship. The commissioning of choreographer-in-residence Dana Tai Soon Burgess’s performance “El Muro” (The Wall) appeared on both that list and the new release. Burgess did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The White House announced a more aggressive review of Smithsonian materials last week. The institution is conducting its own internal review.

Other exhibitions and artifacts seem to have newly caught the White House’s attention. One of the listed exhibitions is a temporary, ground-floor show in the American History museum about the history of Title IX and women in sports. The White House took issue with its references to transgender athletes.


Trump purge of Smithsonian exhibits got underway in April and included removal of Harriet Tubman’s hymn book: report

Ariana Baio
Wed, August 20, 2025
THE INDEPENDENT


The Trump administration announced this week that it would begin reviewing current and former exhibitions at Smithsonian museums to ensure they align with president’s agenda and perspective of history – a task which had already been underway and will likely expand purges of historical artifacts.

For months, the museum has been reviewing, and at times quietly removing, certain artifacts on display to comply with Trump’s March executive order, aiming to “restore truth and sanity to American history” by getting rid of “divisive narratives that distort our shared history.”

The president has indicated some of those “divisive narratives” include acknowledgment of transgender athletes and in-depth analysis of slavery.


On Tuesday, Trump wrote on Truth Social: “The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future. We are not going to allow this to happen.”

Having anticipated the administration would begin reviewing its museums, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, which is a Smithsonian Institution, appeared to begin changing its displays.

In April, the National Museum of African American History and Culture sparked controversy after it announced it would return several artifacts to their donors, including a Bible carried during a civil rights protest and Harriet Tubman’s book of hymnsNBC News reported.


President Donald Trump, pictured at a Smithsonian museum 2017, has ordered his administration to review the museums’ exhibitions (Getty Images)

But the museum defended its decision-making, saying it was made independent of the White House, officials told news outlets. A spokesperson for the museum said at the time that they routinely return artifacts based on loan agreements or to rotate displays.

The Independent has asked the National Museum of African American History and Culture for comment.

However, Trump has publicly pulled federal funding from institutions that do not align with his policies and indicated he’s not afraid to continue doing so to incentivize people to follow his orders.

Prominent universities such as Harvard and Johns Hopkins have seen millions of dollars in funding revoked for not aligning with the president’s agenda. In his Tuesday Truth Social post, Trump said he has instructed his attorneys to adopt a similar “process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made.”

“This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE,” he added.



National Museum of African American History and Culture is one of eight Smithsonian museums under review by the administration. (Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved)

Much of his ire toward institutions stems from his disdain for diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, which he has prohibited across the federal government.

As part of the administration’s efforts to comply with the president’s agenda, federal references to historically prominent Black Americans have been minimized, and references to white Americans, regardless of controversy, have been restored.

Trump has sought to restore Confederate names and monuments after many were taken down or destroyed during or in response to racial justice protests in 2020. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a series of military bases would be renamed after controversial Confederate soldiers or generals during the Civil War.

Even on government websites, inclusive language or references to certain American heroes have been scrubbed. Earlier this year, the National Park Service faced pushback for removing mentions of Tubman and the Underground Railroad on its website. Park Service leaders said the changes were unauthorized and subsequently restored mentions to Tubman.

While the administration said this week it would review eight Smithsonian museums, all eyes are on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, which is dedicated to highlighting and educating the public about African-American history and culture, and likely to be targeted.


KULTUR- KITSCH

Trump Paintings Multiply on White House Walls as Other Presidents' Portraits Get Moved. See What's Been Added

A White House official said there are more Trump portraits to come amid controversy over the president's decision to move Barack Obama's official portrait to a hidden stairwell


Meredith Kile
Wed, August 20, 2025 

Win McNamee/Getty; Chip Somodevilla/GettyTwo of the many new paintings of President Donald Trump that now hang in the White House

President Donald Trump is hanging even more portraits of himself around the White House.

This week, a new painting of the president was revealed on social media. Longtime Trump ally Sebastian Gorka, who is currently serving as deputy assistant to the president and senior director for counterterrorism, shared a photo on X of the artwork, which shows Trump walking forward, his hands tucked into a long dark coat, flanked by rows of American flags.

"One of the new @WhiteHouse paintings of President @realDonaldTrump," Gorka captioned the post. "More to come."

One of the new @WhiteHouse paintings of President @realDonaldTrump.

More to come. pic.twitter.com/yQy8qiVejC

— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) August 19, 2025

Another new addition to the White House art collection was shared in May by New York Times White House correspondent Shawn McCreesh.

McCreesh posted a photo to X of a portrait depicting Trump with late Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan and Abraham Lincoln looking over his shoulder, which he said was spotted "on the walls of the West Wing."


JIM WATSON/AFP via GettyA painting of Donald Trump hangs in the White House Grand Foyer where Barack Obama's portrait was located

Trump showed off another recent painting of himself, the one pictured above, while posing for a photo with European leaders during a Ukraine summit at the White House on Monday, Aug. 18.

White House communications adviser Margo Martin shared a video on X of Trump pointing out the artistic depiction of his July 2024 assassination attempt, which she called his "Butler 'Fight, Fight, Fight' painting."

The painting, which has hung in the White House since April, shows him raising his fist while surrounded by Secret Service agents after a bullet grazed his ear at a rally in Butler, Pa.. "That was not a great day!" Trump joked to the group.

“That was not a great day!”

President @realDonaldTrump shows the European Leaders his Butler ‘Fight, Fight, Fight’ painting pic.twitter.com/fGdBKhLjxj

— Margo Martin (@MargoMartin47) August 18, 2025

Other additions to the White House walls during Trump's second term have included an unorthodox painting of Trump's face overlaid with an American flag — which was crammed in between portraits of two former first ladies — as well as a new presidential portrait that bears a striking resemblance to his August 2023 mug shot. A framed New York Post cover showing his actual mug shot was also spotted on a wall just outside the Oval Office.



Chip Somodevilla/GettyAnother new painting of Donald Trump hangs in the East Wing where Hillary Clinton's first lady portrait was

The latest Trump artwork revealed by Gorka comes just a week after a White House official confirmed to PEOPLE that the president had broken precedent to move Barack Obama's official portrait out of public view.

White House tradition says that the two most recent presidential portraits should hang prominently on either side of the Grand Foyer for members of the public to appreciate during tours and events. Since President Joe Biden's White House portrait has not yet been completed, the two most recent portraits are of Obama and George W. Bush.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Back in April, the president swapped Obama's portrait with the "Fight, Fight, Fight" assassination attempt painting. Now, Obama's portrait has been moved even further from public view, to the top of the Grand Staircase.

The stairwell, which leads up to the president's private living area, is off-limits to visitors and partially obstructed from public view. CNN reported that Obama's portrait in particular is "firmly out of view" for visitors.

Insiders also told the outlet that Trump signs off on nearly all aesthetic changes to the White House, no matter how small.


A spokesperson for Obama declined to comment on the recent change.

The portraits aren't the only major change that Trump has made since taking office for a second time. He's also come under fire from critics for his gaudy makeover of the Oval Office.

An April report in The Wall Street Journal revealed that the president had enlisted his "gold guy," cabinetmaker John Icart, to create golden borders for his political portraits, gilded carvings for the fireplace mantel and a gold Trump crest in a doorway.


MANDEL NGAN/AFP via GettyUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. President Donald Trump meet in the Oval Office on Aug. 18, 2025More

Musician Jack White slammed the Oval Office's new look in an Instagram rant following Trump's Aug. 18 meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.


"Look at how disgusting Trump has transformed the historic White House," White wrote. "It's now a vulgar, gold-leafed and gaudy, professional wrestler's dressing room. Can't wait for the UFC match on the front lawn too, he's almost fully achieved the movie 'Idiocracy.' "

"Look at his disgusting taste, would you even buy a used car from this conman, let alone give him the nuclear codes?" he continued. "A gold-plated Trump bible would look perfect up on that mantle with a pair of Trump shoes on either side, wouldn't it? What an embarrassment to American history."

Opinion | Donald Trump's new White House portrait makes perfect sense


Zeeshan Aleem
Wed, August 20, 2025 
MSNBC

White House adviser Sebastian Gorka unveiled a new White House painting of President Donald Trump on X on Monday, and promised there were "more to come." The portrait itself — along with a host of other changes that Trump is making to White House decor — capture Trump's political project far better than he may have intended.

The portrait depicts Trump with a stern-looking expression and looking remarkably trim in an overcoat. The painting also conveys the president in motion — he appears to be striding down a hall between two rows of American flags. The most striking feature of the work, however, is not the subject, but the backdrop: Streaks of orange leap and glow behind Trump. It's difficult not to see it as fire.

A Trump supporter might look at this painting and see things to like. Trump, a man of action, looking uncharacteristically fit, forging a new nation in the crucible of chaos that is modern America. For those not on the MAGA train, it's easy to see the painting as self-parody — Trump is not taming the chaos, but authoring it, leaving a trail of destruction in his wake as he transforms the republic into an inferno.



Trump appears to have a fixation on paying homage to himself in the White House. In April NBC News reported that the White House "moved the official portrait of former President Barack Obama to a new location in the building’s Grand Foyer, replacing it with a painting of President Donald Trump with his fist raised in the air right after last year’s assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania." That Trump painting took the spot "traditionally reserved for the most recent official presidential portrait." (Former President Joe Biden does not yet have an official portrait.)

The White House also unveiled a new official photographic portrait of Trump in June, a close-up that replaced the official photograph released just months earlier, at the time of his second inauguration. In both of those photographs, Trump glares at the viewer against a dark backdrop, in contrast to Trump's smiling visage in his official photographic portrait in his first term. It's important, it seems, to get the scowl just right.


President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office on Monday. (Julia Demaree Nikhinson / AP)

Beyond the apparent obsession with representations of himself, Trump is keen on changing the White House to match his gaudy personal aesthetic. He has blanketed the Oval Office in gold ornaments and gold trim. And NBC News reported in July that Trump is replacing the part of the East Wing traditionally used for the first lady’s offices with a giant ballroom, a renovation effort that would mark the “biggest transformation of the White House complex since Harry Truman’s day,” referring to when Truman added a balcony to the White House. According to NBC News, Trump checks in on construction work in the White House weekly, spending up to half an hour asking the workers questions.

It is unsurprising that a former reality TV star and poor real estate developer whose success relies on constant hype that is never fulfilled would be preoccupied with turning the White House into a temple dedicated to his brand. That doesn't make it any less vulgar.

US Soybean Farmers Warn Trump: Without A China Trade Deal, America Risks Losing Billions As Beijing Turns To Brazil

Namrata Sen
Wed, August 20, 2025 
Benzinga 

U.S. soybean farmers have urged President Donald Trump to secure a trade deal with China that includes substantial soybean purchases, warning of severe long-term economic consequences if the U.S. crop continues to be shunned.

ASA urges Trump to secure China soybean trade deal

On Tuesday, the American Soybean Association (ASA) urged President Trump in a letter to finalize a trade deal with China that guarantees substantial soybean purchase commitments. This call comes as China, the world’s largest soybean buyer, is increasingly turning to Brazilian soybeans due to ongoing trade tensions with the U.S., reported Reuters.

The ASA letter highlighted the financial strain on U.S. soybean farmers, who are experiencing a drop in prices while facing increased costs for inputs and equipment. The letter warned that U.S. soybean farmers may not be able to withstand a prolonged trade dispute with their largest customer, China.

U.S. farmers risk losing billions, the ASA warned, as China increasingly turns to Brazilian soybeans. In 2023–2024, China made up 54% of U.S. soybean exports, valued at $13.2 billion.
Farmers Anxious As China Delays US Soybean Purchases

This plea from U.S. soybean farmers follows President Trump’s recent call for China to quadruple its soybean orders from the U.S. to address its soybean shortage and reduce the trade deficit between the two countries. However, experts have deemed this highly unlikely.

Despite the President’s suggestion, China has not pre-purchased soybeans from the upcoming U.S. harvest, causing concern among traders and farmers.

On a positive note, the outlook for U.S. and global corn and soybean crops in 2025 is generally positive, with strong vegetation health in corn-growing regions and stable conditions for soybeans globally. The record-high yield estimates for corn and the favorable weather forecast for soybeans in August point to a promising harvest season ahead.

 Benzinga.com