Wednesday, September 01, 2021

The future of flooding in Venice: improving projections, predictions and protection in the face of expected sea level rise


Peer-Reviewed Publication

EUROPEAN GEOSCIENCES UNION

St Mark's Square flooding current and historical comparison 

IMAGE: PRESENT CONDITION OF ST.MARK'S SQUARE DURING PARTIAL FLOODING OF ITS LOWEST AREAS (ESTIMATED SEA LEVEL: 80CM) AND HISTORICAL PICTURE CLOSE TO THE TIME OF HIGHEST WATER ON THE 4 NOVEMBER 1966 FLOOD (BLACK AND WHITE PHOTO COURTESY OF GIANFRANCO TAGLIAPIETRA) view more 

CREDIT: PIERO LIONELLO AND GIANFRANCO TAGLIAPIETRA

MUNICH — A new assessment of flood risk in Venice indicates that the impact of higher emissions on relative sea level rise during this century will be critical in planning future defence infrastructure for Venice and other coastal cities, state the authors of a new special issue published in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences today.

The special issue, with contributions lead by researchers from Università del SalentoISMAR - Institute of Marine Sciences and University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, draws evidence from historical and contemporaneous data to explore why the flood risk in the UNESCO World Heritage city of Venice has increased in the recent past and is expected to further increase, even accelerate in the course of the 21st century.

One of the key factors when considering the serious threat of flooding in Venice and other coastal cities, is the importance of projected relative sea level rise. Relative sea level rise is the sea level’s change relative to the local solid Earth’s surface, and incorporates aspects of ground sinking as well as the mean sea level itself increasing.

Long-term future projections indicate a large uncertainty in the relative sea level of Venice of between 17 and 120 cm by 2100, which lead author Davide Zanchettin attributes to the challenges of projections based on the wide range of emission scenarios, and to insufficient understanding of relevant physical processes, both acting remotely and inside the Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea. “For a projection to be useful, it must be well constrained” Zanchettin says “There are important feedbacks in the climate system, for instance related to polar ice sheet dynamics, that we need to understand and better simulate to make more reliable projections.”

“Small increases can have a large impact”
The importance of accurate projections of the steady and inevitable rise in sea level for coastal cities like Venice is brought into focus when you consider the combination of that increase with extreme events that precipitate serious flooding. The extreme events that cause flooding in Venice have so far  been attributed mainly to storm surges caused by sirocco winds, but a greater variety of factors will involved in future extreme events, including meteotsunamis and massive planetary atmospheric waves that affect sea level at multiple scales. “When you are this close to the upper limit of the tidal range, any meteorological event can be hazardous and cause an extreme flood,” says lead author Piero Lionello, “Small increases can have a large impact.”

CAPTION

This art installation, called 'Support', was created by artist Lorenzo Quinn in Venice’s world-famous Grand Canal to raise awareness about climate change (source: imaggeo.egu.eu).

CREDIT

Hung Vuong Pham

In the short-term, the protection of Venice from flooding mostly depends on the effective and timely deployment of the new MoSE (Modulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico) coastal defence system, which has already been operated several times since October 2020 to protect the city. The design relies on being able to predict the water level 4-6 hours ahead of the maximum and open or close the barriers, in order to protect the vulnerable low-lying city from flooding at some times, and provide access to the port and maintain the environmental balance of the lagoon at others.

“The MoSE system will be operated on the forecast,” says Georg Umgiesser. “If the forecast is wrong, the operation of the MoSE becomes wrong—and that is very important both economically and ecologically.” Reducing the uncertainty that exists in any forecasting model is critical and Umgiesser suggests this is particularly effective when combining multiple independent models to account for differences in the numerical models.


Giving governments time to plan
The wide ranging impacts of a high emissions scenario on the operation of the new MoSE system and flooding in Venice are made clear in this special issue, both in the short and longer term, with the possibility of a year-round closure of the lagoon needed as early as 2075 to keep up with rising relative sea levels, in a plausible but unlikely scenario.

Such an extreme closure of the coastal defence system would have serious environmental and economic impacts on the city of Venice and the lagoon, but there are ways coastal cities can adapt. “Sea level is a nasty beast; we could stop global warming completely by stopping the use of fossil fuels and the sea level would continue to rise in spite of this, though at a much reduced pace.” Lionello notes. “But we have the information with studies like these to identify the future risk to coastal cities like Venice. Although we don’t know exactly when, the present evidence  is  that we will need to change our adaption strategies. It’s clear that we need to be prepared to act.”


CAPTION

Projected sea level change in Venice in the context of historical observations. Observations are annual-mean tide gauge relative sea-level height anomalies with respect to the 2000-2007 average. Projections are based on two reference scenarios of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission, namely RCP2.6 (low emission scenario) and RCIP8.5 (strong emission scenario), and a high-end scenario illustrating a plausible evolution obtained by combining the highest estimates of all individual contributions to relative sea level rise. The horizontal blue lines shows the annual persistence of the sea level above the present safeguard level as a function of future relative mean sea level. These time intervals approximately correspond to the annual duration of the expected closures of MoSE.

CREDIT

Piero Lionello, Robert Nicholls, Georg Umgiesser and Davide Zanchettin

No comments: