Monday, March 02, 2026

 

Scientists sharpen genetic maps to help pinpoint DNA changes that influence human health traits and disease risk



By rapidly testing hundreds of thousands of DNA sequences, scientists have identified specific genetic variations that contribute to blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, and more.



Jackson Laboratory

IMAGE: Functional dissection of complex trait variants at single-nucleotide resolution 

image: 

  

view more 

Credit: The Jackson Laboratory





Scientists have identified how specific genetic changes function in cells to influence disease risk and other human health traits. By probing regions of DNA previously linked to disease, the work has created high resolution maps of DNA variant activity, helping pinpoint the exact changes that shape blood pressure, cholesterol levels, blood sugar and other complex human traits.

The study, published today in Nature and led by researchers from The Jackson Laboratory (JAX), the Broad Institute, and Yale University, takes on a long-standing challenge in human genetics. Scientists have known for years that certain regions of the genome—often spanning tens of thousands to millions of DNA letters—are associated with diseases. But because these regions usually contain many variants that could potentially drive those associations, performing the necessary experiments to pinpoint which specific DNA changes truly matter has been difficult and time-consuming. 

The solution was scale. Using a method capable of testing thousands of such variants at once, the team tested more than 220,000 previously identified DNA changes in five different cell types. By doing so, they resolved about 20 percent of these regions across the genome, revealing new insights into what these variants do, which in turn can help improve risk prediction and guide the development of new therapies.    

“For nearly two decades, genetic studies have identified where in the genome we need to look for disease risk, but not which specific DNA changes are responsible,” said Ryan Tewhey, a geneticist and an associate professor who led the team at JAX. “Our study helps close this gap by working at the scale needed to confidently pinpoint the specific DNA changes that matter across thousands of regions all at once, rather than one by one.”

Tewhey explained that previously making these connections was like searching for a single typo on one page of a massive book. This experimental approach is akin to speed reading, scanning thousands of pages at once and flagging the exact letters that change meaning, dramatically accelerating genetic discovery.

“What excites me is that this is a bridge from association to biology," said Layla Siraj, first author of the study, which she spearheaded while in the Lander Lab at the Broad Institute, and now in her residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University/New York Presbyterian. “By uncovering the patterns underlying how single-letter changes affect gene regulation, we can start mechanistically connecting genetic risk to the pathways therapies could target.”

In addition to Tewhey and Siraj, the study was co-led by Jacob Ulirsch, currently a group leader at Illumina. Key authors also include Steven Reilly, assistant professor at Yale School of Medicine; and Hilary Finucane, associate member at the Broad Institute and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital.

Building a foundation for better disease risk prediction 

Most DNA changes linked to common diseases like heart disease and type 2 diabetes occur not within genes themselves—which only constitute about 2 percent of the genome—but in the vast stretches of non-coding DNA, where regulatory elements exist that control when, where and how strongly our genes are expressed. Genetic studies conducted over the last two decades have identified millions of such non-coding disease-related variants throughout the genome. The challenge has been identifying which of the many single-letter changes in these regulatory DNA regions affect gene activity, fine-tuning protein production and in turn shaping disease risk.

To meet this challenge, the researchers used a technology called a massively parallel reporter assay, which allowed them to test the effects of more than 220,000 single-letter DNA variants at the same time across different cell types, including brain, liver and blood cells. Each stretch of DNA was paired with a molecular tag, or reporter, that they could directly measure to see whether a variant increased, decreased, or had no effect on gene activity—an important step in understanding how regulatory DNA changes may affect health.

The results revealed over 13,000 single-letter variants that influence how strongly a gene is expressed. While most act independently, the team found that about 11 percent behaved differently than expected when combined with a nearby variant. This surprising result suggests some genetic risk of disease depends on specific combinations of variants whose whole is greater than the sum of its parts. 

These insights revealed potential links to human health. In some cases, pairs of variants were associated with gene activity linked to lower levels of LDL, or “bad” cholesterol. Other combinations appear to affect a gene associated with blood pressure. The team also identified two variants near the ESS2 gene--associated with developmental disorders--whose combined effect on gene expression was greater than would be expected from either variant alone.

Improving equity in genetics-driven advances

In another example, the researchers pinpointed a single variant associated with long-term blood sugar control discovered in people of European ancestry. Based on its molecular behavior, they predicted that similar but previously understudied variants, found predominantly in people of African ancestry, would show a similar association. Follow-up analysis confirmed that prediction, underscoring the importance of understanding genetic mechanisms across diverse populations. 

While the study identified which DNA variants regulate specific protein-coding genes in the brain, liver and blood cells, additional experiments will be needed to determine how those variants ultimately influence traits and disease risk. Given the body’s many tissues and thousands of distinct cell types, switching genes on or off in a single cell type is only one piece of a much larger puzzle in determining health outcomes. In addition, millions of genetic variants remain untested. Even so, the researchers say the findings can already begin strengthening how scientists study genetic variation and how they influence health traits.

“These findings do more than explain known disease associations. They provide training data to build predictive models of the effects of variants we haven’t yet studied or that remain undiscovered,” Tewhey said.

Tewhey, Reilly, and their colleagues recently created such a model with this data. Published in Nature in 2024, they used this model to design synthetic DNA sequences that could selectively turn genes on in distinct tissue types one at a time. It also builds on works Tewhey and Ulirsch published in 2016 while colleagues at Broad. Together, these advances point toward a future where genetic risk can be more accurately predicted and where therapies can be designed to act only in the tissues where they are needed most.  

 

AI, monkey brains, and the virtue of small thinking




Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Dot detection 

image: 

Pictures like these drove the large AI models’ responses “well beyond the response range for normal images,” according to the study.

view more 

Credit: Cowley lab/CSHL





What does it take to make AI that can pass as human? Try massive clusters of supercomputers. To build human-like intelligence, computer scientists think big. However, for neuroscientists who want to understand how real brains work, today’s AI only goes so far, as it replaces one deeply complicated system (the brain) with another (AI). How then do we figure out the inner workings of the biological brain? To answer this question, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Assistant Professor Benjamin Cowley is thinking small.

In collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University Professor Matthew Smith and Princeton University Professor Jonathan Pillow, Cowley has helped develop a new AI model much smaller and simpler than today’s “state-of-the-art” systems, yet far better at illustrating how the brain makes sense of visual stimuli. In previous work, Cowley trained AI to anticipate neural responses in fruit flies. This time, he’s set his sights on macaque, a species of monkey whose brains are much closer to humans.

In a new study published in Nature, Cowley and colleagues present macaques with sets of carefully curated natural images and track which neurons in the animals’ visual cortex fire in response to each picture. From there, they first train large AI models to predict neural responses to specific images until they outperform competing models by more than 30%. Then, they use compression technology to shrink the large AI model to about 1/1,000 the size. The result is a vision model small enough for an email attachment.

Finding that AI models of the brain could be this tiny is huge in itself. But Cowley goes further, pinpointing the inner workings of these models. This analysis reveals something extraordinary. The compact model neurons all break down images into low-level features like edges and colors, then form unique preferences by consolidating this information in different ways. What does this mean for primates like us? Cowley offers one example: “In the monkey’s brain—and in our brains, too, most likely—there’s a group of V4 neurons that love dots.”

In other words, there are neurons in your brain that specialize in dot detection. That might seem random, but think about the key features of the face. What are eyes but dots loaded with information? Consider how important eye contact is in daily life.

Looking ahead, the findings have Cowley thinking about building AI models of mental health conditions. “For example, in Alzheimer’s dementia, we know synapses are lost,” he explains. “If we know the images that drive neurons to talk to each other, we can potentially rebuild synapses once thought lost to disease.”

Who knows? Thanks to work like this, one day you might be able to stave off—or even treat—neurodegenerative disease by looking at special pictures. Just wait and see.

 

Firearm mortality and equitable access to trauma care in Chicago




JAMA Surgery





About The Study: 

Strategic placement of a trauma center in an area with high rates of violent injury and limited trauma care access was associated with significantly reduced mortality within the service area. These findings should inform trauma system planning to address geographic disparities in trauma care access, particularly in communities with high rates of penetrating trauma. 



Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Michael R. Poulson, MD, MPH, email michael.poulson@uchicagomedicine.org.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2026.0001)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.0001?guestAccessKey=aefb6104-971d-42d0-adac-5d6f2fbea82a&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=022526

 

New research sheds light on why eczema so often begins in childhood




The Mount Sinai Hospital / Mount Sinai School of Medicine





[New York, NY [February 25, 2026]—A team of researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Weill Cornell Medicine, and other institutions have uncovered a key biological explanation for why eczema so often starts in childhood. The study, in young mice, found that some types of immune cells in early-life skin are more reactive than those in adults, a difference that may help explain why children are more vulnerable to inflammation and allergic skin disease.    

The findings suggest that early childhood represents a critical window for immune-driven skin disease and may shed light on why eczema is often the first condition in a broader pattern of allergic disease. They were reported in the February 25 online issue of Nature [DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10162-x].

Eczema affects nearly one in four children and often appears early in life. It can also precede other allergic conditions, including asthma and food allergies. Until now, scientists have not fully understood why the disease is so strongly linked to early childhood.

“We found that allergy risk is shaped very early in life, when the skin’s immune system is biologically programmed to overreact to allergens, with important consequences for understanding how immune-mediated diseases emerge and should be treated,” says senior study author Shruti Naik, PhD, Associate Professor of Immunology and Immunotherapy, and Dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine. “By pinpointing the cells and hormonal signals that control this window of vulnerability, we open the door to strategies that could prevent allergic disease before it spreads from the skin to the lungs, gut, and beyond.”

The researchers discovered that a specific immune cell type, the dendritic cell, in young skin behaves differently than in adults. These cells do not overreact to everything—but when it comes to allergens, they respond faster and more strongly, setting the stage for inflammation and eczema early in life. In adult skin, the same cells are far less reactive.

To understand why allergies often start in early childhood, researchers exposed infant mice to everyday allergens such as dust mites and mold. Unlike adult mice, the infants developed strong skin inflammation, revealing a brief early-life period when the skin’s immune system is especially sensitive.

The scientists traced this response to dendritic cells, which are unusually active shortly after birth and triggers allergic inflammation. When this pathway was blocked, the young mice did not develop skin allergies.

The team also found that infants lack normal levels of stress hormones that later help keep immune reactions in check, allowing these allergic responses to take hold. Importantly, signs of the same immune activity were found in skin samples from children with early-onset eczema, but not in adults, suggesting this early-life window may also be important in humans.

“This work was only possible through a true clinic-to-lab collaboration—where insights from pediatric patients shaped the questions we asked in the lab,” says study co-author Emma Guttman-Yassky, MD, PhD, the Waldman Professor of Dermatology and Immunology and Health System Chair of the Kimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine. “By studying allergic disease where it actually begins, in early life, and by modeling clinically relevant allergens and disease features, lead author Yue Xing, PhD, uncovered immune biology that simply doesn’t appear in adult models. By revealing what’s unique about the early-life immune system, this work explains why eczema so often begins in infancy.”

Next, the investigators plan to explore ways to block this early-life immune pathway to stop allergic disease before it spreads from the skin to other organs. 

“Beyond eczema, this study reinforces a critical point for medicine,” says Dr. Naik. “Children are not simply small adults when it comes to immunity. Their immune system follows a unique set of rules, and recognizing that difference is essential for understanding—and ultimately preventing—allergic, immune-driven diseases that begin in childhood.”

The paper is titled “Peripheral immune-inducer(pii)-DCs drive early life allergic inflammation.”

The study’s authors, as listed in the journal, are Yue Xing, Ilana Reznikov, Abonti Nur Ahmed, Ikjot Sidhu, Jill Wisnewski, Asma Farhat, Aleksandr Prystupa, Piotr Konieczny, Kody Mansfield, Melissa L. Cooper, Stephen T. Yeung, Madeline Kim, Sophia Adeghe, Katherine D. Gaines, Meredith Manson, JiHyun Sim, Qingrong Huang, Ata S. Moshiri, Kamal M. Khanna, Theresa Lu, Emma, Guttman-Yassky, Amanda W. Lund, Niroshana Anandasabapathy, and Shruti Naik.

For details on funding and competing interests, please see the paper Nature.

-####-

About the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is internationally renowned for its outstanding research, educational, and clinical care programs. It is the sole academic partner for the seven member hospitals* of the Mount Sinai Health System, one of the largest academic health systems in the United States, providing care to New York City’s large and diverse patient population.   

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai offers highly competitive MD, PhD, MD-PhD, and master’s degree programs, with enrollment of more than 1,200 students. It has the largest graduate medical education program in the country, with more than 2,600 clinical residents and fellows training throughout the Health System. Its Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences offers 13 degree-granting programs, conducts innovative basic and translational research, and trains more than 560 postdoctoral research fellows.  

Ranked 11th nationwide in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is among the 99th percentile in research dollars per investigator according to the Association of American Medical Colleges.  More than 4,500 scientists, educators, and clinicians work within and across dozens of academic departments and multidisciplinary institutes with an emphasis on translational research and therapeutics. Through Mount Sinai Innovation Partners (MSIP), the Health System facilitates the real-world application and commercialization of medical breakthroughs made at Mount Sinai. 

-------------------------------------------------------  

* Mount Sinai Health System member hospitals: The Mount Sinai Hospital; Mount Sinai Brooklyn; Mount Sinai Morningside; Mount Sinai Queens; Mount Sinai South Nassau; Mount Sinai West; and New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai