It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Big Oil Takeover ‘Now Complete,’ Watchdog Warns as Exxon Lawyer Joins Trump DOJ
“The Justice Department that should be fighting to protect clean air and water and avert catastrophic climate change will now work on behalf of polluters to advance the poisoning of people and the planet.”
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods during a meeting in the East Room of the White House on January 9, 2026. (Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
The executive counsel at the fossil fuel behemoth ExxonMobil is leaving his role to join the Trump Justice Department’s newly renamed Energy and Natural Resources Division, a move one watchdog organization said shows that “Big Oil’s capture of the US government is now complete.”
Robert Levy, who worked at Exxon for 17 years, announced in a recent LinkedIn post that he is departing the company, whose profits surged amid the Trump administration’s illegal war on Iran. Levy will reportedly serve as senior counsel at the DOJ’s Energy and Natural Resources Division, which the Trump Justice Department renamed last month from the Environment and Natural Resources Division.
Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday that “the new so-called Energy and Natural Resources Division at the Justice Department explicitly aims to abuse emergency powers to drive oil and gas production, override state environmental enforcement, and generally serve at the beck and call of Big Oil.”
“Nothing could make that more clear than the naming of Robert Levy, ExxonMobil’s former executive counsel, a position that had him leading the company’s legal strategy on advocacy and civil justice, to run the division,” said Weissman. “The Justice Department that should be fighting to protect clean air and water and avert catastrophic climate change will now work on behalf of polluters to advance the poisoning of people and the planet.”
Fossil fuel giants have received a significant return on their investment. As Owen Bacskai of the Brennan Center for Justice noted, Trump’s “signature legislative package—which one executive deemed ‘positive for us across all of our top priorities’—gives oil and gas firms $18 billion in tax incentives while rolling back incentives for clean energy alternatives.”
Trump has also “placed fossil fuelallies in charge of the agencies that oversee the industry and fast-tracked drilling projects on public lands,” Bacskai wrote. “In just his first 100 days back in office, Trump took at least 145 actions to undo environmental rules—more than he reversed during his entire first term as president. Before Trump even reentered the White House, the industry was reportedly pre-drafting executive orders for him to issue.”
Perhaps the biggest gift to Big Oil was the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision earlier this year to repeal the “endangerment finding” underpinning climate regulations.
Critics expect more of the same industry-friendly actions from the Trump DOJ’s Energy and Natural Resources Division, which last week touted its role in defending “Trump’s executive orders on unleashing American energy, reinvigorating the clean coal industry, and declaring an energy emergency.”
“The Justice Department that should be fighting to protect clean air and water and avert catastrophic climate change will now work on behalf of polluters to advance the poisoning of people and the planet,” said Weissman of Public Citizen.
Last year, Public Citizen and the Revolving Door Project released an analysis showing that the Trump administration has installed dozens of former fossil fuel industry employees, executives, and lawyers across the federal government, positioning Big Oil allies to advance “the massive expansion of polluting energy, the destruction of public lands, and the sabotage and suppression of renewable energy.”
“This is nothing short of a Texas oil industry takeover of the US government at the expense of consumers, the climate, public health, and public lands and waters,” Alan Zibel, a research director at Public Citizen, said at the time of the report’s release. “To execute his extreme, reckless, backward-looking fossil fuel agenda, Trump has stocked his administration with fossil fuel staffers and ideologues.”
Saturday, June 27, 2026
‘Trump’s Name Written All Over It’: Supreme Court Sides With Monsanto Over Roundup Cancer Victims
“People who were exposed, workers who were never warned, consumers who trusted a label—they now have fewer tools to use to fight back. And the corporations responsible for that harm have more protection than ever.”
“The People v. Poison” protesters gather at the US Supreme Court on April 27, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Public health advocates, legal experts, and members of Congress were among those outraged on Thursday by the US Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of Monsanto—and, effectively, against thousands of people who argue that its weedkiller Roundup caused their cancer.
Jay Feldman, executive director of the organization Beyond Pesticides, blasted the 7-2 decision as “a tragic setback for public and environmental health, allowing companies that produce toxic pesticides to evade the most basic of responsibilities, warning consumers that their products may cause cancer and other deadly diseases.”
“In an age of deregulation, the ability of farmers, farmworkers, and consumers to hold chemical manufacturers accountable for hazard warnings is the keystone to minimum protection of public health, as demand in the market for the safest possible products grows daily,” Feldman said in a statement.
The closely watched case stems from a state-level lawsuit and a resulting verdict in favor of John Durnell, a Missouri man who argued that Monsanto’s glyphosate-based Roundup caused his non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a blood cancer, which is in remission after multiple rounds of chemotherapy. A jury agreed the herbicide’s label should have had a cancer warning.
The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classifiedglyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans over a decade ago, but the US Environmental Protection Agency and Bayer still insist it is safe. In a majority opinion penned by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the country’s high court agreed with the company’s argument that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts Durnell’s failure-to-warn claim under state law.
In a dissent joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that “the majority reads into FIFRA a labeling requirement that does not exist, and it reads out of FIFRA the statute’s ongoing prohibition on misbranding. This interpretation cannot be squared with the text of FIFRA or our precedents. Ultimately, the effect of the majority’s interpretation is both remarkable and regrettable, for it unjustifiably closes the courthouse doors to state tort plaintiffs like Durnell.”
Bayer—which boughtMonsanto in 2018—similarly noted in a Thursday statement that the ruling “should help significantly contain the Roundup litigation after nearly a decade of legal battles,” which the company also said that it will keep trying to resolve by seeking final approval of its proposed $7.25 billion class settlement.
“This case was never just about Bayer,” Environmental Working Group president and co-founder Ken Cook emphasized Thursday. “It was about whether states retain the authority to provide stronger protections for their residents when federal regulations fall short, and whether ordinary Americans can hold powerful corporations accountable when their pesticides cause harm.”
Despite returning to office with a promise to “Make America Healthy Again” alongside Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s administration “didn’t sit on the sidelines—it lobbied the Supreme Court to strip Americans of their right to sue. And its tactics worked,” Cook pointed out. “When a president uses the vast power of the federal government to protect a pesticide company from accountability—instead of the people he swore to serve—our system is no longer working for ordinary Americans.”
“The ultimate losers are the American people,” Cook concluded. “People who were exposed, workers who were never warned, consumers who trusted a label—they now have fewer tools to use to fight back. And the corporations responsible for that harm have more protection than ever.”
Federal lawmakers who have fought against GOP efforts to pass a legislative “liability shield” for pesticide companies, including Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) joined Cook in ripping the ruling, as did Earthjustice senior attorney Patti Goldman, who said that it “allows Monsanto and other chemical companies to avoid responsibility when their labels leave people unprotected from serious harm.”
As Farm Action president Angela Huffman also warned that the ruling “sets a dangerous precedent for other corporations seeking similar immunity,” Sarah Starman, senior food and agriculture Campaigner at Friends of the Earth, took aim at the Supreme Court for issuing a decision that “sells out farmers, gardeners, and rural communities to multibillion-dollar pesticide corporations.”
Food & Water Watch legal director Tarah Heinzen, also condemned the decision, declaring that “once again, the Supreme Court has sided with big business over people and the environment.”
“Today’s ruling is a disaster for public health—and it has Trump’s name written all over it,” said Heinzen. “If one needed any further proof that the president’s feigned mission to ‘Make America Healthy Again’ was a farce, today’s decision is all the evidence needed. Trump has been all too willing to endorse Bayer’s crusade to pollute with impunity, while the administration doubles down on a failed pesticide regulatory scheme.”
“Industrial agriculture is poisoning America,” she stressed. “The fight against toxic pesticides does not end here. Congress must pass the Pesticide Injury Accountability Act to safeguard access to justice for all harmed by these toxic chemicals, and a Farm Bill that finally puts public health first. Until then, the Supreme Court has shut the courthouse doors to tens of thousands of sick and suffering Americans.”
Kayla Hancock, director of Protect Our Care’s Public Health Project, also called out Trump for dispatching US Solicitor General D. John Sauer to argue the case on the side of Bayer and its legal team.
“First Donald Trumpsigned an executive order plowing the field for increased glyphosate production despite the known health risks to help grow profits for his chemical industry donors,” Hancock said. “Then Trump dispatched his [US Department of Justice] lawyers to help Big Chemical secure blanket immunity from at least 100,000 glyphosate-related liability claims.”
“Sadly, the Supreme Court agreed to give glyphosate makers a free pass to poison Americans without warning,” she added. “Donald Trump always has and always will prioritize big money corporate interests that benefit him, even if it means marginalizing the MAHA movement and concerned moms. And whenever Trump sells out public health to the highest industry bidder, there’s no bigger apologist than his phony health secretary, RFK Jr.”
Silver tetradrachm (4 drachmas) of the island of Rhodes depicting Sun god Helios, 205-190 BCE. Courtesy Ebedokle Collection, Numismatic Museum, Athens.
Prologue
A Greek friend from Canada, Dr. Nikos Chrystodoulou, sent me an article about an American company, Cambrian Nuclear, working with Athlos Energy, a Greek nuclear company founded in 2024, and the Greek government, potentially planning to build a nuclear power factory in Greece. But because Greece is not free of earthquakes, most likely these companies are recommending to Greek government officials a floating nuclear power plant on the waters of the Aegen Sea. Dr. Chrystodoulou, a nuclear power engineer with 22 years of working experience for the Chalk River Nuclear Labs and 6 years for Canada’s Nuclear Safety Commission, said to me in an email that the announcement about nuclear power plants in Greece must have been some kind of a joke. However, before I address the irresponsible and dangerous nuclear electricity proposal, I will travel back in time to see how the ancient Greeks treated the Sun, source for life-giving, inexhaustible and harmless energy.
Sun God Helios
For thousands of years, the Greeks expressed their ευσέβεια / eusebeia / respect / veneration for several gods. Homer and Hesiod, great epic poets of the late 13th century BCE, defined the gods. They were divine anthropomorphic beings, icons of the enormous powers of nature and the Cosmos. They were human-like polymaths, which sometimes specialized in a major interest or field of knowledge or what Greeks called πολιτισμός / civilization.
For example, the chief god and father of the Olympian gods, Zeus, mirrored immense power and everlasting justice. He protected the family, foreigners visiting Greece, Panhellenic games like the Olympics, and civilization. His daughter, Athena, was the goddess of intelligence, war and freedom. She protected Athens. Hephaistos was the personification of metallurgy, engineering and advanced technology. Demetra, sister of Zeus, was the Earth herself, Gaia / Ge. She inspired and helped Greeks to cultivate wheat and other bread-making crops. She was family farming and prosperous countryside. The Greeks credited her for their agriculture and the Eleusinian Mysteries. Dionysos, son of Zeus, was, like Demetra, a pillar of rural life and Hellenic civilization. He was wine, theater, tragedy and freedom. The theater of Dionysos was for centuries a school of democracy and freedom. Other gods included Apollo, god of light, prophesy and music; Aphrodite, goddess of love; Artemis, goddess of wildlife and the natural world; Hermes, god-messenger and god of music, and Ares, god of war.
In addition to these Olympian gods, there were demi-gods like Herakles and countless lesser divinities all over the land and waters. The Greeks also worshipped the natural world and the Cosmos. The stars were gods. This devotion to the stars also explains the Antikythera Mechanism for an exact knowledge of the eclipses of the Sun god Helios and the Moon. More about the celestial computer bellow.
The Sun god Helios was by far the most important of all gods. He gave light and life to humans, the natural world of the Earth and the Cosmos. Helios married the Nymph Rhodos, daughter of the goddesses Amphitrite or Aphrodite. Helios moved to Rhodes with his wife. The island Rhodes honored Helios. It adopted the name of his wife, Rhodos. It built a colossal metal statue of Helios, which was a marvel of technology and sculpture. It was sculpted by Chares of Lindos, an artist from Rhodes, in the years 294-282 BCE. Chares was student of Lysippos who did portraits of Alexander the Great. The statue took the human form of Helios. Its legs stranded the entrance of the harbor of Rhodes.
The Colossus of Rhodes was a huge statue of Helios, patron god of Rhodes. Painting by Louis de Caullery, 17th century. Louvre. Wikipedia Commons.
Rhodes: Pharos / Lighthouse of science and technology
Rhodes probably benefited for its devotion to the Sun god Helios. It shined in science and technology. Hipparchos, the great Greek astronomer of the second century BCE, set up his astronomy lab in Rhodes. He probably designed and built with his technical team the Antikythera Mechanism, an astronomical computer of genius. This toothed-geared Promethean machine was 2,000 years ahead of its time. It predicted the eclipses of the Sun and the Moon, including the date of the Panhellenic athletic and religious festivals like the Olympics. In an article I wrote in 2025, I add that the Antikythera computer also: “brought the heavens nearer to Earth and into human understanding. It served as an accurate calendar of human events and a calendar of the celestial universe, a moving map of the constellations and a mirror of nature and the heavens.”
Modern scientists have been studying the fragments of the Antikythera computer for some 125 years. They have called its front side the Cosmos. At the very center of that Cosmos we see the golden sphere of the Sun, as well as pointers of the Moon and other planets. The front and back of the device is full of inscriptions explaining the Cosmos.
One of those scientists who studied the fragments of the Antikythera Mechanism is my friend and colleague Xenophon Moussas, former professor of space physics and astronomy at the University of Athens.
Inscriptions in gold yellow citing Sun god Helios. The largest surviving gear A, which includes 27 of the surviving 30 gears. Moussas incorporated fragment A, in blue, on the inscriptions. Courtesy Xenophon Moussas.
The fall of ancient Greece
Despite the privileged position of ancient Hellas / Greece in gorgeous art, architecture, science, technology and civilization, and the unprecedented genius, power and influence of Alexander the Great, Hellas fell victim to its own antagonisms and foreign conquests.
The Romans annexed Greece in 146 BCE. Some 500 years later, in the fourth century of our own era, the Roman emperor Constantine started the Christianization of Hellas and the Roman Empire. This was the equivalent of blasting Hellas and Rome with a nuclear bomb: massive destruction of the temples, schools, stadia, theaters, government buildings. Books and libraries went up in flames.
Christianity was a Jewish heresy centered on one god. Telling the ancient Greeks they had to abandon their beautiful gods and gorgeous temples like the Parthenon for a crucified Jew named Jesus was the signing of their death sentences.
The early Christian emperors and heads of the new “Orthodox” church pushed the ancient Greeks off the cliff. They desolated Hellas. Merely 1 percent of ancient Greek writings survived the Christian holocaust. “Christian” Greeks to this day remain somewhat schizophrenic about the authenticity of their civilization. Is it Hellenic or Christian or a marriage of the two? Some of them and genetic science say they are indeed the children of the ancient and medieval (Byzantine) Greeks, that is, Minoans, Myceneans, classical and medieval Greeks. The Science magazine reported in 2017: “The Greeks really do have near-mythical origins.” This recognition is a huge honor and confirmation of history, especially at times that most of Western “scholars” are saying directly or in diplomatic language that modern Greeks have nothing to do with ancient Greeks. Many of these so-called classical scholars study the ancient Greeks for reasons that justify the looting of Hellenic archaeological treasures by their countries and, possibly, by themselves. World-class museums are full of stolen Greek antiquities: like the British Museum in London, Louvre in Paris, the Getty Museum in California, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and other major museums in Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Netherlands, Italy, Belgium and Russia.
In fact, Nazi Germans became model of looting. They occupied Greece, April 1941-October 1944. They came close to wiping out Greece. They also stole thousands of Hellenic treasures from Greek museums and illegal excavations. German museums have the audacity to exhibit these looted treasures. And because a WWII and post-WWII Greece fought a British and German instigated civil war , 1943-1949, it failed to demand the return of its stolen treasures.
Another factor that keeps Greece weak and pilotless was America’s Cold War that brought Greece and Greece’s eternal enemy, Turkey, in America’s military camp of NATO. That political conflict of the US-NATO and communist Soviet Union / Russia paralyzed Greece, allowing the American-licensed Turkey in 1974 to invade and capture half of the Greek island of Cyprus.
Floating nuclear plant in the Aegean?
This very brief overview of Greek history explains even utterly inconceivable events like the Greek and American nuclear companies scheming with Greek government officials for potentially approving a floating nuclear power plant in the Aegean.
My friend, Dr. Chrystodoulou in Canada, is unhappy about such a prospect. He is concerned that modern Greece has zero experience with extremely complicated and dangerous nuclear power. What are they going to do with the “spent” fuel, he asks. It remains “hot” for thousands of years. In an email, he expressed his worries: “Greece has no experience in any of these [nuclear power plant] problems, and given their abysmal lack of safety in trains, what possible trust can one have in a decision to bring nuclear power to this country? They haven’t even automated the system that is designed to avoid head-on [train] collisions, and which could have prevented the Tempi disaster [in 2023], and one can trust them to operate nuclear power plants that are quite complicated machines [?]…. I think this suggestion [by the Greek and American nuclear company of floating nuclear power plants in Greece]… is not well thought out, and frankly, I can only characterize it as a joke or πυροτέχνημα [fire work].”
Those in the Greek government who contemplate such insane proposal ought to immediately drop it. They should remember this most basic fact: Greece does not need nuclear power plants.
They know, or should know, that Greece for millennia has been a solar country. Rhodes was the home of Helios. Christianity has abolished even the name Sun god Helios but cannot do away with geography and civilization — and the current emergency of climate chaos. Like it or not, solar power is the present and the future, no matter what President Trump and the oil companies and petroleum wars say about climate. To design a floating nuclear power plant in the Aegean is to risk catastrophic poisoning of the Aegean and, second, create a perfect target for the genocidal country of Turkey that persist (1) in its occupation of half of Cyprus and (2) keeping up its aggression against Greece to the point of calling the Aegean its “blue homeland.”
Epilogue
The Greek government must finally get serious and accept the historical fact that it is governing Greeks intimately connected to the giants of Greek science and civilization and military genius: Homer, Thales, Lykourgos, Solon, Kleisthenes, Herakleitos, Pythagoras, Hippocrates, Demokritos, Miltiades, Themistokles, Herodotos, Thucydides, Aristarchos of Samos, Aeschylos, Sophokles, Euripides, Aristophanes, Pericles, Plato, Aristotle, Euclid, Archimedes, Alexander the Great, Hipparchos, Ptolemaios, Plutarch, Galen, Plethon, Rigas Pheraios, Adamantios Koraes, Theodoros Kolokotrones, Dionysios Solomos, Ioannes Kapodistrias, Alexandros Papadiamantis, Andreas Laskaratos, K. P. Kavafis, Odysseas Elytes, Kostis Palamas, George Seferis and Mikis Theodorakis.
The implication of accepting this truth is the reexamination of both domestic and foreign policy of the country. The Greeks who fought and defeated the vast Persian empire (in 490 and 480-479 BCE) were patriots whose virtues treasured freedom above all else. Freedom or death was their flag. The Greeks defeated the Italians in 1940 for the same reason. The Greeks of 2026 can do the same thing — should their genocidal Turkish neighbors dare to enter the Aegean.
The same Hellenic thinking leads to the conclusion that toxic imports like nuclear power plants or giant windmills or biocidal farm chemicals must be rejected because they defile Hellas. The Sun god Helios remains the most reliable and appropriate source for energy for Hellas — in 2026.
Recreate the Colossus of Rhodes. Open another Hipparchos school in Rhodes for advanced studies in astronomy and Antikythera-like computers of genius. Invite China to establish a Helios factory in Rhodes and another in Peloponnesos or Thrace. These factories would manufacture electric cars, buses, trains, trams and solar panels for the complete solar electrification and transportation of the country.
Evaggelos Vallianatos, Ph.D., is a historian and ecological-political theorist. He studied zoology and history, Greek and European, at the University of Illinois and Wisconsin. He did postdoctoral studies in the history of science at Harvard. He worked on Capitol Hill and the US Environmental Protection Agency; taught at several universities, and authored hundreds of articles and several books, including Poison Spring (2014), The Antikythera Mechanism (2021), Freedom (2025) and Earth on Fire: Brewing Plagues and Climate Chaos in Our Backyards (World Scientific, 2026).
Sunday, June 14, 2026
Toxic Metals, Sulphur & Coal Dust: The Battle To Clean Up The Worst Air in South Africa
From wealthy suburbs to impoverished townships, people living in South Africa’s industrial heartland are uniting to stop an environmental disaster on their doorstep.
Mdu Tshabalala (3rd from left) and other Vaal residents protest outside Glubay Coal’s offices in Johannesburg, July 2024. (Julia Evans/Daily Maverick)
When Mel Mandy gave birth to her first child twenty-five years ago, the doctor told her off for smoking while pregnant. Her boy had been born with underdeveloped lungs, a common condition in the newborns of smokers. But Mandy had never smoked a cigarette in her life. The problem was where she lived.
Mandy is one of the nearly two million people who live in South Africa’s Vaal Triangle. The coal-rich region, 60km south of Johannesburg, encompasses three cities, wealthy suburbs, impoverished townships, and some of the most polluting industries in existence, including the largest steel plant in Africa, a petrochemical plant, and a coal-fired power station.
One of Vaal’s cities, Vereeniging, is by some measures the most polluted city in the world. Its air regularly registers the highest recorded concentrations of toxic emissions known as PM2.5, microscopic particles which can penetrate lung tissue and cause cancers, cardiac problems, and other diseases.
Mandy lives in a town called Meyerton, just east of Vereeniging. Her house stands 6km from a manganese smelter, once the largest in the world, where giant coal-fed furnaces produced an alloy used to strengthen steel. Officially, the smelter was allowed to pump out emissions for one hour a day. According to Mandy, it belched out black smoke all night under the cover of darkness. “Some nights, the sulphur smell was so strong it would burn your nose,” she recalled.
Her son suffered repeated lung infections, and her younger daughter developed severe asthma. Mandy emailed the government repeatedly for years about the emissions. Eventually the national environmental enforcement agency, known as the Green Scorpions, got in touch. The Green Scorpion was apologetic – the agency was too short-staffed to investigate. But if Mandy could source any data to back up her claims, they might be able to prosecute.
So Mandy met with an epidemiologist at Wits University in Johannesburg, who got in contact with a neurologist studying the health effects of manganese at Washington University, USA. It turned out that this manganese smelter was the only one in the world to operate right beside residential areas, and in 2013 the neurologist and the epidemiologist co-launched a study into the plant’s manganese-laced pollution and its health impacts on nearby communities.
The study involved establishing air monitoring stations, and collecting toenail or hair clippings from locals. The focus was on Sicelo, an impoverished township that reached up to the very edge of the smelter. Mandy became a fieldworker, recruiting a growing pool of participants and ensuring tests went smoothly. The Green Scorpions were invited to look at the dataset, which was showing how proximity to the smelter increased rates of parkinsonsim, cognitive decline and depression – all symptoms of manganese poisoning. Two years later the agency prosecuted the smelter’s owners, Samancor, for failing to monitor and manage its pollution.
The owners pled guilty, paid fines of around $300,000, and promised to undertake costly upgrades to become compliant with environmental regulations. Within four years, the plant was mothballed due to unsustainable operational costs. Meanwhile, the health study expanded and still continues to this day, and Mandy’s now adult children are thriving, albeit away from Meyerton. If this was a Hollywood film, the credits would start running now.
But the real story doesn’t end there. Today, the manganese smelter has a new owner, who not only wants to restart operations by next year, but also turn 2,500 hectares of farmland directly behind it into two open-pit coal mines. And despite national air pollution laws clearly outlawing such a project, the government has just awarded the mines environmental authorisation.
Mandy is now part of a coalition of residents, spread across dozens of affected communities, preparing to fight that authorisation in court and on the streets. At risk is not just the air they breathe, but the structural integrity of their buildings, the toxicity of their drinking water, the value of their properties and businesses, and the very existence of their neighbourhoods.
Yusuf Sather speaks at a public consultation open day for the mine in June 2023. (Christiaan Cloete)
The shit hit the fan
Initially, the proposal was for just one open-pit coal mine covering farmland between Vereeniging and Meyerton – farmland almost entirely surrounded by residential areas. The company managing the project, Glubay Coal, was legally required to engage in a public participation process, so in late 2019 it hired a consultancy firm to hold open meetings in four of the communities close to the proposed mine site.
One of those four chosen communities was Roshnee, a wealthy and predominantly Indian suburb north of Vereeniging. A consultant had turned up a ratepayers’ association meeting there to see if a public gathering could be accommodated, and the five attendees listened as he made a short presentation about the mine, which would operate as close as 2km from their homes. One of those listening was Yusuf Sather, who had spent 25 years working in the mining industry.
Sather knew better than most what it actually meant to have an open-pit coal mine on your doorstep. Open-cast extraction involves large-scale surface blasting, which would either send huge plumes of black coal dust into the air, or use up billions of litres of water each month to smother it. The blasting would also threaten the structural integrity of buildings within a 4km radius. Two schools sat within 1km of the proposed mine site. Some homes were just 100m away.
Throughout its 30-year lifetime, the mine would pump out acidic wastewater to stop it flooding, and this would poison the groundwater in a region where many still drink from boreholes. The air and noise pollution would make houses impossible to sell, and drive away local business. And a huge area of fertile farmland, supporting hundreds of workers and vegetable street-sellers, would be totally erased.
Sather and the other worried residents decided to hold their own community meeting about the mine, weeks before the official consultancy one. Eight days later, around 400 residents filled Roshnee’s civic centre to hear about the mine’s adverse impacts from medical and legal experts, as well as the local farmers facing ruin. A steering committee was established, and an online petition was started.
Supporters were encouraged to join a WhatsApp chat for further campaigning, and sign up as Interested and Affected Persons (IAPs) so they could receive official updates about the mine from the consultancy firm. Hundreds did so. The Coal-ition Committee was born, and the resistance had begun.
The four public meetings were poorly advertised. Notices appeared in unread local newspapers, or on roadside fences too small to read from a passing car. When the consultant eventually entered Roshnee’s civic centre to do his own presentation, he wasn’t ready for the levels of knowledge and opposition in the room. “It was a disaster,” remembered Sather. “The guy couldn’t answer any of the questions we put forward. He just kept saying he needed to go back and confer with Glubay Coal.” The residents became increasingly exasperated, and the consultant left early.
As the Covid pandemic swept across the globe, Glubay Coal’s venture went into hibernation. But when it reawakened in 2023, it had grown even larger. Now it encompassed two open-pit mines, with a smaller mine nestled beside the first, and a railway siding to link the coal to the wider rail network once used by the smelter. Despite also requiring surface blasting, the second mine was just 1km away from a hazardous landfill site full of toxic medical waste and chemicals.
This is when, as Sather puts it, “the shit hit the fan.” Coal-ition members reached out to the local media, and set up stalls in regional malls, schools and community centres, encouraging people to sign up as IAPs, register their objections to the mines, and join the Coal-ition. By now membership of the group had spread well beyond Roshnee, and was close to one thousand strong.
Because the mine project had been expanded, the public participation process had to be restarted. Glubay Coal hired a new consultancy firm, which decided to replace large, potentially volatile meetings with open days, where residents would arrive in small scheduled groups to read brochures and ask questions. There would be just two of these days – in a small suburb dominated by a shopping centre, and Sicelo, the impoverished township of corrugated iron shacks right next to the smelter. Roshnee’s civic centre would no longer be part of the process.
The presentation now focused on how the mines would create five hundred and fifty jobs for the region – and for the poorest communities in the Vaal, the promise of jobs trumped all other concerns. One third of South Africans are unemployed – the second-highest rate in the world. But in the Vaal Triangle the rate is well over half. The region has endured two decades of economic decline, with once thriving steel plants and collieries slowing production or closing outright, and many thousands of jobs being shed.
This industrial retreat has been partly down to competition from China, and partly because of a domestic energy crisis that has seen electricity costs soar as supply has faltered. Mismanagement and corruption in the state-owned power company Eskom, whose coal-fired power plants generate 90% of the nation’s electricity, has meant power cuts and managed blackouts have become part of South African life.
An outgoing Eskom chief executive, brought in to clean up the company, publicly agreed that it was “a feeding trough” for the country’s governing party, the ANC, and claimed Eskom sustained at least four organised crime networks. The next morning, his coffee was spiked with cyanide. He was lucky to survive.
For Sather and the members of the Coal-ition, the economic benefits of the mines were a mirage. “Coal mining is increasingly mechanised. You need to employ specialised people from outside to come in. Locals could do the more menial jobs, but that would only be two or three hundred. More jobs would be lost destroying all the farmland, which supports small entrepreneurs selling maize and vegetables,” he stressed. Another problem for the poorest job-seekers in the Vaal, is that they often live closest to the industrial sites and so suffer most from the pollution. They become too sick to work for the companies that were poisoning them.
A map showing the two proposed mine sites and the many residential areas surrounding it. Meyerton is in the northeast corner. (Christiaan Cloete)
Respiratory illness was everywhere
In 2007, Mdu Tshabalala applied for a factory worker job at the massive ArcelorMittal steel plant in Vereeniging. Tshabalala had studied business administration at college but, like so many young people in the Vaal, was struggling to find steady work. So he turned to the factory that loomed over Sebokeng, the township where he lived. He was sent to a doctor stationed by the steel plant and diagnosed with sinusitis. The doctor gave him a piece of paper telling him he was not fit to enter the factory.
Tshabalala has suffered from sinusitis for his whole life. As a child growing up in Sasolburg, the Vaal Triangle’s southernmost city, his nose became so blocked he couldn’t sleep, and he would use an asthma inhaler in the evenings. He also suffered regular nose bleeds, headaches and eye infections. The air would smell like rotten eggs thanks to the hydrogen sulphide emissions from a Sasol petrochemicals plant, and buildings were coated in black dust from a nearby open-pit colliery owned by the same company. “In Sasolburg, everyone was sick,” Tshabalala said. “My cousin was repeatedly hospitalised with breathing issues. Respiratory illness was everywhere.”
Despite his health problems, the teenage Tshabalala developed a love for breakdancing. When his family moved to Sebokeng, he befriended other performers and artists, and they formed an environmental group after clearing a rubbish-strewn local space for them all to use. This led to Tshabalala joining a youth climate forum in the run-up to COP17, which was hosted by South Africa. At the convention, he discovered the existence of a local organisation called the Vaal Environmental Justice Alliance (VEJA).
VEJA grew out of the efforts of black farmers, post-apartheid, to get compensation from a local steel plant for poisoning their farmland, as well as former steelworkers seeking fair dismissal. Today, VEJA advocates for townships across the Vaal Triangle, holding community workshops about the impacts of industrial pollution, tracking those impacts, and taking the companies responsible to court. Tshabalala is now a manager of the group, and his sinusitis is kept in check with herbs grown by his wife, who is also an environmental activist.
South Africa actually has robust air quality laws that should render most of VEJA’s work unnecessary. In 2006, the government designated the Vaal Triangle as the country’s first air quality priority area, meaning legal limits on emissions from heavy industry, mines, and waste burning (common in poorer communities where local services are absent). But the corporate polluters were granted exemptions by the government after complaining that compliance would be too costly and threaten yet more jobs. Recent legal amendments have set even tougher pollution limits, yet the air quality of the Vaal remains some of the world’s worst.
Tshabalala and his wife ran a small but active Extinction Rebellion chapter in Sebokeng, and in July 2024, Tshabalala approached the Coal-ition Committee to propose a joint protest outside Glubay Coal’s headquarters in Johannesburg. Time was short to prepare – Tshabalala had already applied for a police permit, which meant the protest would need to happen within two weeks. And Coal-ition members would need to organise their own transport.
On the day, Extinction Rebellion Vaal activists staged a funeral for their land, air, and water outside the glistening corporate headquarters, and Tshabalala handed a memorandum of demands to a sheepish looking Glubay executive. From a media perspective, the action was a great success. Both Tshabalala and Sather had scoured their journalist contacts, and the protest was covered by the national press.
But from a community cohesion perspective, it was a disappointment. Only three members of the Coal-ition Committee attended. When Tshabalala organised another protest against the mine three months later, this time outside the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy in Pretoria, not one of the approximately one hundred Vaal residents who attended were from the Coal-ition. “They are scared,” said Tshabalala when asked to explain the disparity. “Middle class people don’t like protests. That is my observation.”
Mandy, who is half-British, half-Afrikaner, had a different explanation: “I think a lot of white South Africans view that kind of protest as ‘toyi-toying’ and so not for them.” Toyi-toyi is a fusion of dance, marching and chanting that became a regular feature of anti-apartheid street protests in the 1980s, and synonymous with black activism. When I ask Tshabalala if there were racial tensions at the initial meetings between township activists and Coal-lition members, he chuckles. “At the beginning, yes, there were tensions. But now we have got over each other, and I’ve made a lot of friends. We are united against a coal mine that will devastate our communities.”
Despite the widespread resistance to the mine, Glubay submitted an environmental impacts assessment to the government last July, and in February of this year the government granted the mines environmental approval. Residents had just twenty days to submit appeals, and Mandy, Sather, and Tshabalala were in regular communication as they hastily coordinated their efforts. Sather hired a lawyer to file an appeal on behalf of the now 9,000 registered IAPs, with legal funding coming from a group of Roshnee business owners.
For his appeal, Tshabalala approached lawyers at the Centre For Environmental Rights (CER), an organisation that has worked with VEJA on previous legal cases. He then visited townships and informal settlements to garner community support. Mandy has written her own appeal, focusing on the ties between the coal mines and the manganese smelter.
The activists found out by accident that Glubay Coal, the company behind the mine proposal, and Khwelamet, the company that bought the manganese smelter last June, are ultimately owned by the same private investment company, Menar. The two entities are symbiotic – the smelter will have a ready supply of coal, and the mines will have access to the smelter’s railway network. “The site’s one long mining belt with a smelter at the end. The three businesses should be treated as one,” said Mandy.
XR Vaal and the Coal-ition Committee hold a small roadside rally to raise awareness about the coal mines, May 2026. (XR Vaal)
The full nine yards
Menar’s founder and managing director is Vuslat Bayoğlu. He moved from Turkey to South Africa in 2002, and quickly started buying up mining interests across the country. He has become a prominent voice in the sector, courting the South African media, writing op-eds, and making speeches that champion coal and competitively priced electricity to resurrect the nation’s mining sector. Asked to predict what 2026 would bring at a recent mining expo, Bayoğlu bullishly replied: “I think we’re going to bring all these smelters back, and we’re going to re-industrialise South Africa, which we need to do because that’s how we create jobs in this country.”
But Bayoğlu has also courted controversy. He was linked to South African arms companies bought by his brother, and accused by a former Turkish ambassador and a Turkish government official of being a member of FETO, a terrorist group implicated in a failed coup in Turkey in 2016. Since the coup attempt, thousands of suspected FETO members and hundreds of millions of dollars have moved from Turkey to South Africa.
Even if the Vaal resident’s appeals are dismissed, Bayoğlu will still have a number of hurdles to jump before his open-pit mines can begin operations. Environmental management licences for water, air quality, and waste will all need to be applied for. And should the government grant them, each licence will be appealed by Vaal’s residents. “We will oppose at each and every stage, go the full nine yards” said Sather, who expects the litigation process to last at least two years. The Roshnee residents currently paying the legal costs will not last that long though. “If we have to go to court, we’ll launch a fundraising campaign,” he added.
At a recent Coal-ition Committee group meeting, the first to be held since the mines received Environmental Authorisation, some hard truths were delivered by Sather and Tshabalala about the campaign. The two men stressed the need to increase media exposure now the appeal process has begun, and for Vaal’s activist residents to come together and embrace nonviolent protest to get their voices heard. A large march targeting the government institutions that are failing them received broad support from the attendees, and is being planned for the coming weeks.
To mark this new unified approach, the day after the meeting, Sather and a few other Coal-ition members joined Extinction Rebellion Vaal for a small but noisy rally along a busy main road that passes between the two proposed mines. Mandy, meanwhile, has promised to attend the coming march. After twenty-five years of environmental activism, it will be her first ever street protest.
Adem Ay is a writer and activist based in London. He spent five years working for Extinction Rebellion, where he helped coordinate the global media team and edit a global newsletter that connected him to activists all over the world. He wants to spread their inspiring stories as far and wide as possible.Email