Friday, May 23, 2025

  

Improving computer science curriculum and teaching in the new information age




Higher Education Press
Figure 1 

image: 

Loop model of AI-empowered psychology education.

view more 

Credit: Feng Yu1 , Yijun Zhao1 , Liying Xu1 , Kaiping Peng2




In the digital intelligence era, psychology education faces challenges and requires transformation to cultivate adaptable and interdisciplinary talents. This paper proposes two models to guide this change.

For knowledge-oriented psychology education, a “loop model” is introduced. Based on the self-regulation theory, it divides the learning process into five components: knowledge acquisition, comparator, standard, assessment, and pass. AI can play an important role in each part. For example, as a digital teaching assistant in knowledge acquisition, it breaks through time and space limitations; in setting standards, it enables personalised teaching plans.

Regarding research-oriented psychology education, a “chimeric research” framework is presented. It divides AI-psychology research into “AI for psychology” and “AI of psychology”. The former uses AI to enhance traditional psychological research methods, like accelerating literature reviews and improving hypothesis testing. The latter treats AI as a research subject, exploring how it impacts different sub-fields of psychology.

Overall, these models, guided by outcome-based education theory, aim to cultivate students into problem-solvers. Although the educational revolution is in its infancy, these ideas offer a new perspective on psychology education reform in the digital intelligence era.

The work titled “Teaching Psychology in Era of Digital Intelligence: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge-Oriented and Research-Oriented Education”, was published on Frontiers of Digital Education (published on March 20, 2025).

“Chimeric research” framework of AI psychology.

Credit

Feng Yu1 , Yijun Zhao1 , Liying Xu1 , Kaiping Peng2

A trinity teaching mode grounded in the MOA framework: insights from Wuhan University’s internet marketing course




Higher Education Press
Figure 1 

image: 

Overall framework of the proposed trinity teaching mode. MOA: motivation, opportunity, and ability; CIE: creativity–innovation–entrepreneurship.

view more 

Credit: Minxue Huang1 , Yangyi (Eric) Tang1 , Yuan Liu1 , Qiyuan Wang2




In the digital economy era, higher education needs to cultivate creativity–innovation–entrepreneurship (CIE) talents. The Internet marketing course at Wuhan University redesigned its teaching to address challenges in traditional teaching methods.

Based on the MOA framework, the traditional teaching model has issues. In terms of motivation, students lack intrinsic drive as teaching doesn’t consider their interests. Regarding opportunity, limited integration of emerging realities restricts practical application. And for ability, traditional teaching overlooks self-learning and innovation capabilities.

To solve these problems, an innovative trinity teaching method was developed. In the motivation dimension, diverse assignments and peer feedback-based evaluation stimulate students’ intrinsic motivation. The opportunity dimension creates learning chances through a “four-in-one” platform and collaborative activities. The ability dimension focuses on cultivating students’ comprehensive innovative abilities.

The “four-in-one” teaching resource system, including full-process support, immersive teaching, autonomous learning, and integrated experimental platforms, supports the new teaching method. The full-process support resources facilitate five distinct learning stages in Internet marketing course, including the cognitive learning stage, simulated practice stage, application enhancement stage, knowledge expansion stage, and outcome presentation stage.

The course content was reconstructed in five dimensions: theoretical depth, technical rigour, intensive practical application, expansive knowledge, and ideological resilience. The teaching evaluation was also reformed, with peer-based assessment, differentiated assignments, and embedded ideological education.

The new teaching model has achieved positive results, such as high student satisfaction, increased employability, and excellent performance in graduate school admissions and competitions. It provides a practical approach for marketing education reform and talent cultivation in the digital economy.

The work titled “A Trinity Teaching Mode Grounded in the MOA Framework: Insights from Wuhan University’s Internet Marketing Course”, was published on Frontiers of Digital Education (published on March 20, 2025).


Figure 2 
 

Full-process support resource. MOOC: massive open online courses.

Credit

Minxue Huang1 , Yangyi (Eric) Tang1 , Yuan Liu1 , Qiyuan Wang2

An innovation talent cultivation mechanism for robotics in the digital-intelligent era: exploration and practice at Wuhan University




Higher Education Press
Figure 1 

image: 

Three-stage progressive practical curriculum system.

view more 

Credit: Xiaohui Xiao , Yiying Zhu , Zhao Guo , Yanzhao Ma , Zhiqiang Zhang , Like Cao , Zhao Feng , Wei Wang





In the digital-intelligent era, with the booming development of the robotics industry in China, cultivating high-quality robotics talents has become a crucial task for universities. This research, based on the practices at Wuhan University, proposes an innovative talent cultivation mechanism.

The proposed mechanism emphasises system reconstruction and fourfold integration of education. A three-stage progressive practical curriculum system is constructed. In the foundation course stage, digital-intelligent courses are added. The major course stage focuses on core robotics knowledge with AI integration, and the innovation course stage encourages students to participate in projects and competitions.

A project-driven innovation practice platform has been built, integrating research-activated education, industry-driven education, competition-enhanced education, and interdisciplinary education. This mechanism effectively combines theoretical learning with practical activities, motivating students to engage in exploration and innovation.

The implementation of this mechanism has achieved remarkable results. Students have improved their innovative practice abilities, with more patents, papers, and high-level academic achievements. The postgraduate enrollment rate has increased, and graduates are highly favoured by well-known institutions and enterprises. The mechanism has also enhanced Wuhan University's influence in the field, attracting exchanges from other universities. Overall, this mechanism provides a practical and effective approach for cultivating robotics talents in the digital-intelligent era.

The work titled “An Innovation Talent Cultivation Mechanism for Robotics in the Digital-Intelligent Era: Exploration and Practice at Wuhan University”, was published on Frontiers of Digital Education (published on March 20, 2025).

 

Just 100 corporations behind a fifth of global extractive conflicts, study reveals




Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
fig.1 

image: 

ONLY 104 COMPANIES ARE INVOLVED IN 20%OF THE OCNFLICTIVE EXTRACTIVE PROJECTS

view more 

Credit: ICTA-UAB





Just one hundred corporations are behind a fifth of the documented extractive conflicts worldwide, exposing how companies from the Global North seize resources and profits, while social and ecological harms are imposed on the Global South, according to a recent study by Institute of Environmental Science and Technology at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB).

The findings are based on the analysis of data from the Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas), an interactive map that locates and documents more than 4,300 extractive conflicts around the world - such as disputed mines, pipelines, or hydropower dams resisted by environmental justice activists and local communities.

The most conflictive 100 corporations - including Shell, Glencore, Repsol, or Bayer-Monsanto - represent only 2% of the 5,500 companies documented in the EJAtlas and yet are involved in 20% of the conflicts analysed. The vast majority of these companies are transnational giants that operate in the energy, mining, and hydropower sectors, are headquartered in the Global North, and yet their activities have serious negative impacts on communities in the Global South.

The study reveals that nearly half of the companies involved in extractive conflicts in the Global South are from the Global North. Furthermore, 50% of the companies involved in conflicts in impoverished countries originate from developed economies such as the U.S., China, and Europe.

“Current global trade rules, such as free trade agreements, investor-state dispute settlement courts, and foreign investment tax incentives, promote the unfettered growth of big transnationals involved in a large number of extractive conflicts, and exacerbate the environmental and social impacts of their extractive operations, primarily in the Global South" explains Marcel Llavero-Pasquina, , ICTA-UAB researcher and lead author of the study, published this week in the scientific journal Global Environmental Change.

Transnational corporations are particularly involved in conflicts related to products of high value or large environmental footprints, such as corn, cotton, oil, gas, or precious and rare minerals. In contrast, conflicts over lower-value resources, such as coal or waste, more often involve domestic companies. The extraction and transport of such strategic goods allows Global North companies to more efficiently concentrate wealth while transferring harms such as land dispossession, deforestation or oil spills to communities and ecosystems in the Global South.

The study also shows that the involvement of transnational corporations in extractive conflicts is linked with more harm and worse outcomes for local populations. The authors document more violent events, forced displacements, land dispossession, loss of livelihoods and traditional knowledge, as well as greater impacts on women and Indigenous peoples when multinational companies are involved. In many cases, these conflicts result in repression, corruption, and even the assassination of community leaders and environmental activists.

The report’s findings challenge corporate social responsibility policies and voluntary sustainability commitments. Despite many of these companies being part of initiatives such as the UN Global Compact, they continue to operate in extractive sectors with severe negative impacts. "Teethless voluntary initiatives mainly based on self-reporting paint a deceitful picture of corporate transparency and responsibility. Yet, the voices of the environmental defenders confronting their operations reveal a story of widespread corporate impunity, and a systemic lack of accountability and justice", says Llavero-Pasquina, coordinator of the Environmental Justice Atlas.

 

The researchers call on academia and international organizations to judge corporate social and environmental behaviour based on the outcomes experienced by affected communities rather than on company voluntary policies. The study results urge policymakers to rewrite the rules of global trade on principles of equity, autonomy and reciprocity, and implement binding, mandatory and enforceable regulations on transnational corporations to avoid harm, and when necessary, provide the tools to secure accountability and liability for the impacts linked to their wrongdoing.

“This research sheds light on the dark corners of corporate abuse, clearly illuminating how extensive and deep the tentacles of corporate wrongdoing reach,” said Rachel Rose Jackson, Director of Climate Research & Policy at Corporate Accountability, a corporate watchdog. “It also clearly illustrates the failure of existing mechanisms to deliver justice, address harms, and stop future wrongdoing. The solutions to corporate impunity are not voluntary pledges, self-regulation, or half measures with little to no oversight. Addressing corporate abuse requires meaningful measures that are legally-binding and that truly safeguard people and the planet (not corporate greed). Until we hold corporations liable for the harms they cause, they will continue to wreak destruction in their unconscionable pursuit of profit.”

“This article clearly shows that global trade rules are a legacy of colonialism that give free reign to Global North transnationals to continue plundering the Global South at the expense of communities and ecosystems“, said Meena Raman, Head of Programmes at Third World Network. “Only a system change that counters the imperialistic and neo-liberal order and enables economic and ecological sovereignty of peoples, a fair distribution of world resources and forms of development which are ecologically sustainable and fulfill human needs, can deliver genuine justice for the poor and the planet."

The study comes out as the European Parliament debates the European Commission's Omnibus deregulation package that will water down corporate obligations to prevent human rights and environmental violations across their global supply chains under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).

Speaking to the European Coalition for Corporate Justice, Nick Omonuk, a climate justice activist resisting TotalEnergies' EACOP pipeline in Uganda, said "Irresponsible corporations don’t just extract resources; they extract life. They displace people, destroy livelihoods, and pollute the water and soil we depend on. These companies know exactly what they’re doing, but they don’t care—because the system protects them, not us. We are the ones treated like criminals. The European Commission is making corporate impunity the norm; it’s a death sentence for our communities. If the Omnibus proposals pass, they will give polluters a free pass and directly attack victims and communities."

 

Notes to editors

The Global Atlas of Environmental Justice (ejatlas.org) is a participatory mapping initiative that has documented more than 4300 extractive conflicts around the world. It has more than 5,000 registered contributors from more than 600 higher education institutions and many civil society organisations around the world. It has around 500,000 yearly users, and 100 annual data requests from scientists, students, journalists, and policy-makers around the world. It was founded in 2012 by a global coalition of academic institutions and environmental justice organisations. The EJAtlas has been recognised in the prestigious Balzan and Holberg prizes awarded to Prof. Joan Martínez-Alier, its co-founder.

For each conflict, the EJAtlas systematically collects information on more than 100 fields covering commodities, type of activity, actors mobilised, forms of mobilisation, environmental, health and socio-environmental impacts, and outcomes. It also provides a narrative description of the case. The combination of standardized and narrative information allows the EJAtlas to be locally specific, and globally relevant, enabling case study investigations as well as global analysis to understand world patterns of environmental injustice.

Extractive conflicts are contentious projects or economic activity that are pursued by state, corporate, and, sometimes, also illicit actors (e.g., illegal loggers) facing resistance by civil society actors in which explicit social-environmental claims are made against the project. These conflicts usually arise from structural inequalities of income and power and are often part of, or lead to larger gender, class, caste and ethnic struggles. The EJAtlas classifies conflicts in 10 categories according to the nature of the project: fossil fuels and energy, mineral extraction, biomass and land, water management, nuclear, infrastructure and built environment, industrial and utilities, biodiversity conservation, waste management, tourism.







Nearly half of the conflicts in the global South involve companies from de Global North







Multinational companies use high density commodities to shift socioenvironmental costs







Conflicts with multinational companies have more impacts and worse outcomes


Credit


ICTA-UAB