Friday, February 06, 2026

 

How cultural norms shape childhood development



Duke University



How do children learn to cooperate with others? A new cross-cultural study suggests that the answer depends less on universal rules and more on the social norms surrounding the child.   

In the study, researchers examined how more than 400 children ages five to 13 from the United States, Canada, Peru, Uganda and the Shuar communities of Ecuador behaved in situations involving fairness, trust, forgiveness and honesty. The team also surveyed children and adults in each community to understand what people believed was the “right” thing to do.  

The results show that while young children across cultures begin with similar, largely self-interested behavior (what maximizes resources for them, individually), their choices diverge over time in ways that reflect local cultural norms.  

“We wanted to try and map the regularities and variation in how cooperation develops, and what it looks like across different cultures, which was the impetus for the cross-cultural developmental angle,” said Dorsa Amir, assistant professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Duke University. “We wanted to uncover the roots of human cooperation, which surpass those of all other species in scale and flexibility.” m 

From shared beginnings to cultural pathways  

To look at how children make choices, researchers played a set of four simple games with them, where the children were asked to make choices about sharing resources (in this case, Starbursts), returning favors, forgiving mistakes, and telling the truth, often at a cost to themselves. Together, the games measured how children think about fairness, trust, forgiveness, and honesty in everyday social situations. Across all five societies, younger children tended to prioritize their own interests. But as children entered middle childhood, defined as roughly between ages eight and 13, their behavior increasingly aligned with their community’s values.  

In some societies, children became more likely to reject unfair advantages or share their candy with anonymous others. In Shuar hunter-horticulturalist communities in Amazonian Ecuador, children focused on not wasting resources and getting the most out of what they had, which matched up with how their society functioned. In those areas of Ecuador, where resources are sometimes scarce, it may be more important for people to minimize waste than spread resources out equally.    

“In cross-cultural research, it’s common to measure behavior and then speculate about the causes,” said Amir. “But we wanted to contextualize the work: to actually talk to people in these communities and understand how those choices fit their environment. What we find is that in places like Ecuador, these behaviors aren’t breaking a norm, they are the norm.”  

Importantly, the researchers emphasize that these differences should not be interpreted as some children being more or less “moral” than others. Instead, children appear to be learning what kinds of cooperation make sense in their social world.  

Learning what’s ‘right’, and when to act on it  

To better understand how social norms shape behavior, the research team compared what adults believed others should do with what children actually did when faced with cooperative tasks.  

They found that, in many cases, children’s behavior gradually moved closer to adult norms over time, especially when it came to fairness and trust. However, for some behaviors, such as honesty, children often knew the “right” thing to do before consistently acting on it.  

Forgiveness stood out as an exception. Across all five societies, both children and adults showed strong agreement that accidental mistakes should be forgiven.  

Different strategies for cooperation  

Rather than showing a single, general tendency to cooperate, children in the study followed one of three distinct strategies: maximizing personal gain, cooperating broadly with unknown others, or cooperating selectively depending on the situation.  

The prevalence of these strategies changed with age and differed across societies. In more industrialized societies, children were more likely to cooperate with strangers, perhaps because that was rewarded in their everyday life. But in societies where people rely more on close relationships and resources are scarce, children were more likely to focus on using the resources they have more efficiently. This, researchers said, doesn’t mean one set of children is more or less ‘cooperative’; rather, cooperation itself is culturally constructed and can take many forms.  

Why middle childhood matters  

The findings highlight middle childhood as a critical period for social learning, because that’s when children refine both their behavior and their understanding of how they’re supposed to act in society.  

“Children become increasingly sophisticated at learning and picking up on norms through middle childhood,” said Amir. “In addition to learning the norms around them, they also start to behave more and more in line with those norms, which is sometimes hard to do because it could involve paying a cost.” 

According to researchers, this extended period of learning allows children to fine-tune their behavior to fit the expectations of their community, a process that may be key to human cooperation more broadly.  

Broad implications  

By studying children across a wide range of cultural contexts, the research demonstrates that behaviors observed in U.S. children shouldn’t be treated as the global standard, challenging the frequent and sometimes implicit assumption that findings from Western, industrialized societies apply universally.   

“It’s important to remember there isn’t one single ‘normal developmental pattern’ when it comes to behavior, because whatever we observe is happening within a culture,” said Amir. “There’s no culture-free development. You cannot take culture out of the developmental process.”  

 

University of Phoenix research finds AI-integrated coursework strengthens student learning and career skills



Study finds structured AI activities help adult learners strengthen key learning outcomes and prepare for AI‑enabled roles




University of Phoenix




University of Phoenix announces the publication of “Bridging the AI skills gap: A blueprint for future‑proofing the workforce by including industry advisory councils for undergraduate environmental science program course redesign” in Industry and Higher Education. The article is authored by Jacquelyn Kelly, Ph.D., associate dean, College of General Studies; Dianna Gielstra, Ph.D., full-time faculty, Environmental Science Program, College of General Studies; Tomáš J. Oberding, Ph.D., full-time faculty, Environmental Science Program, College of General Studies, College of General Studies; Jim Bruno, MBA, associate dean, College of Business and Information Technology; and Stephanie Cosentino, MAEd, senior instructional designer for University of Phoenix.

The peer‑reviewed study examined an introductory environmental science course redesigned for nontraditional adult learners and found that students improved on key course goals and career‑aligned skills after artificial intelligence tasks were built into the curriculum. Career-aligned skills are identified and refined with guidance from Industry Advisory Councils, which are groups of experienced professionals who work closely with educational institutions to review programs and curriculum. These councils provide insight on current workforce needs and help ensure that learning outcomes reflect the skills and competencies employers expect in the field.

Findings informed course adjustments and demonstrated that aligning AI skills with course outcomes offers a scalable model for enhancing student readiness for AI‑integrated careers.

How the course redesign integrated AI skills for adult learners

Researchers redesigned a five-week course for nontraditional adult learners and added AI activities tied to the course’s learning goals and career skills, such as asking clear questions and translating information for different audiences. The redesign followed a structured process called Elicit, Design, Create, Deploy, and Research, and used guidance from an industry advisory council to focus the skills on real workplace needs. The team evaluated results using criteria from graded rubrics and student feedback from weekly reflections, class discussions, and end‑of‑course surveys.

What the research found about student gains in AI and career skills

Students advanced on the course learning goals and strengthened career‑aligned skills such as consulting, training, and presenting after AI tasks were built into the class. They also showed progress on key AI competencies, including asking clear questions and translating information for different audiences. The research team used these results, along with student feedback, to fine‑tune the most complex assignment so learners receive more structured support as tasks become more involved.

“Adult learners deserve learning experiences that honor the realities of their lives and the demands of modern workplaces,” said Dr. Kelly. “Guided by industry advisory councils, this work aligns AI skills with course goals and assessed coursework so students can practice employer-valued forms of reasoning, from problem framing to translating technical ideas for different audiences. At its core, the project supports students in developing transferable ways of thinking that extend from the classroom into professional contexts”

Why this matters for workforce readiness and future courses

The authors present the redesign as a scalable model for aligning AI skills with course outcomes, ensuring students have the opportunity to practice with tools they are likely to use in their workplaces. The findings highlight the value of embedding AI tasks directly into coursework, assessing progress with clear rubrics, and offering additional support as assignments increase in complexity.

Access the study: “Bridging the AI Skills Gap: A Blueprint for Future Proofing the Workforce by Including Industry Advisory Councils for Undergraduate Environmental Science Program Course Redesign” is published in Industry and Higher Education and is available online.

About University of Phoenix

University of Phoenix innovates to help working adults enhance their careers and develop skills in a rapidly changing world. Flexible schedules, relevant courses, interactive learning, skills-mapped curriculum for our bachelor’s and master’s degree programs and a Career Services for Life® commitment help students more effectively pursue career and personal aspirations while balancing their busy lives. For more information, visit phoenix.edu.