by Michel-Gérald Boutet (iconographer)
with comments by Joseph Monard (linguist)
ABSTRACT
The following is a description and critical comment on the various models given or proposed by the various interpreters and Reconstructionists for a working zodiac labelled as 'Celtic astrology'. Many attempts have been made at restoring or reconstructing ancient Celtic Astrology, these models are for the most part, fabricated, when not, completely re-invented. Not surprisingly, these tree zodiacs bear very little resemblance to both Western and Eastern Astrology. This being that most of the Reconstructionists have worked from false indications given by Robert Graves who seems to have confused Almanac with Zodiac.
ABSTRACT
The following is a description and critical comment on the various models given or proposed by the various interpreters and Reconstructionists for a working zodiac labelled as 'Celtic astrology'. Many attempts have been made at restoring or reconstructing ancient Celtic Astrology, these models are for the most part, fabricated, when not, completely re-invented. Not surprisingly, these tree zodiacs bear very little resemblance to both Western and Eastern Astrology. This being that most of the Reconstructionists have worked from false indications given by Robert Graves who seems to have confused Almanac with Zodiac.
No comments:
Post a Comment