SPACE/COSMOS
ByAFP
May 29, 2026
Video of the Blue Origin New Glenn rocket explosion showed the spacecraft combusting into a massive fireball - Copyright JohnCn (@JConcilus) on X / UGC/AFP
Charlotte CAUSIT
Space exploration is filled with setbacks, but the spectacular explosion of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket on Thursday night marked a significant blow to not only the company, which was founded by billionaire Jeff Bezos, but also NASA, with the two collaborating for the upcoming US Moon missions.
“Spaceflight is unforgiving,” NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said in a post on X soon after the explosion, promising to “support a thorough investigation of this anomaly,” which happened during a ground test and resulted in no injuries.
The rocket — which stands 98 meters (321 feet) tall and is the most powerful in Blue Origin’s fleet — exploded around 9:00 pm local time Thursday (0100 GMT Friday).
It was undergoing a ground test in Cape Canaveral, Florida in preparation of an upcoming flight when it blew up in a massive fireball, sending shockwaves throughout the space industry.
While anomalies during ground tests are relatively frequent, such explosions are rare, and the magnitude of the blast caused significant damage not only to the spacecraft but the launch pad itself, according to photos of the aftermath released Friday.
“It will take some time to rebuild their pad,” Florida congressman Mike Haridopolos, whose district includes Cape Canaveral, told broadcaster Fox News on Friday.
Blue Origin declined an AFP request for additional details on the incident, extent of damage or the ongoing investigation, which is conducted alongside NASA and the US Space Force.
The New Glenn rocket will remain grounded while the investigation is conducted.
– Moon Mission –
The vessel is at the heart of Blue Origin’s ambition and NASA’s Artemis lunar program, and could have implications for the company’s role going forward.
“I have no doubt they will recover but I’m wondering how does this affect Artemis,” Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP.
NASA has also tasked rival space exploration company SpaceX to develop lunar landers for transporting astronauts and equipment to the surface of the Moon to establish a base.
SpaceX has seen its own challenges in recent months, and Blue Origin had emerged as a promising alternative for NASA, with the US space agency awarding a new contract to it for the lunar mission earlier this week.
– Major setback –
But these projects depend on the New Glenn rocket, and with its explosion coming shortly after a malfunction causing a satellite mission failure last month, the anomalies could disrupt NASA’s tight mission schedule.
NASA is aiming to test an in-orbit rendezvous between a spacecraft and one or two lunar landers in 2027 as part of Artemis III, and carry out a crewed lunar landing before the end of 2028, before the end of US President Donald Trump’s time in office.
Thursday’s explosion also deals a major setback to another Bezos project, the Amazon Leo satellite internet constellation, which seeks to compete with SpaceX’s Starlink but relies on the New Glenn rocket, among others, to launch its satellites, according to Swope.
The Blue Origin rocket blowing up is not the only time an explosion has rocked Cape Canaveral.
Ten years ago, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket blew up during a ground test before launching, destroying a $200 million satellite it was supposed to carry.
D.E.I. IS MERIT
UT Arlington physics Ph.D. student earns NASA fellowship
Award supports Tapendra Sodari’s research on Earth’s upper atmosphere
image:
University of Texas at Arlington physics doctoral student Tapendra Sodari
view moreCredit: UT Arlington
University of Texas at Arlington physics doctoral student Tapendra Sodari has been selected for a prestigious fellowship to fund his NASA-relevant research.
The third-year Ph.D. student was awarded a Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology (FINESST) fellowship from the NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD). The award provides $50,000 annually for three years.
“I am genuinely thrilled and honored to be selected for this award,” Sodari said. “FINESST is highly competitive, with roughly an 18 percent selection rate in Heliophysics this year, so it is exciting and encouraging to receive this recognition.”
Sodari’s project, “Morphology of Equatorial Ionization Anomaly: GOLD Observations and GITM-SAMI3 Simulations,” is in the SMD’s Heliophysics Division. It examines a major feature of Earth’s upper atmosphere called the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly, which can strongly influence GPS accuracy, satellite operations and radio communications in equatorial and low latitude regions.
“Tapendra is an outstanding Ph.D. student who is always highly motivated and energetic,” said Zihan Wang, UTA assistant professor of physics and Sodari’s mentor. “His achievement highlights both his exceptional research potential and the strong national standing of UTA physics students.”
The ionosphere is the portion of the Earth’s upper atmosphere that extends roughly 50 to 400 miles above the planet’s surface. It contains layers that vary in density based on solar radiation. In the low-latitude and equatorial ionosphere, electrically charged particles called plasma form two distinct density bands, or crests, on either side of a low-density trough near the magnetic equator. This structure is known as the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly, or EIA.
“During geomagnetically disturbed periods, these bands can shift, weaken, or intensify,” Sodari said. “Such changes alter electron density along signal paths, degrading GPS positioning accuracy and disrupting radio communications.”
In his research, Sodari is using data from NASA’s Global-scale Observations of Limb and Disk (GOLD) mission, which was launched in 2018. GOLD is an imaging instrument housed on a communications satellite in geostationary orbit which observes the ionosphere and thermosphere. He will combine the data from GOLD with two state-of-the-art models: the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM), a three-dimensional numerical model used to simulate the Earth’s coupled ionosphere and thermosphere; and SAMI3, a three-dimensional model of the ionosphere/plasmasphere system.
“By comparing observations with model simulations, I study how the shape, behavior, and evolution of the post-sunset EIA crests vary with longitude, local time, and geomagnetic conditions. The goal is to understand the physical processes that drive these variations,” Sodari said.
Sodari started his doctoral studies at UTA in August 2023. He said he chose UTA because of its strong research program in space science and the opportunity to work with faculty conducting research in magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere coupling and geospace modeling. He hopes his research will contribute to a better understanding of how Sun-Earth interactions can affect technology on Earth and in space.
“Improving our understanding of the EIA is essential for advancing space weather prediction and protecting critical space-based and ground technologies, making Tapendra’s research both scientifically important and societally relevant,” Wang said.
Rovers, regolith, robots: The blueprint for the moon
In an environment of radiation, extreme temperatures and razor-sharp dust, researchers are designing how humans will build, and ultimately survive, on the moon
image:
Dr. Patrick Suermann
Professor of construction science
Texas A&M University College of Architecture
view moreCredit: Texas A&M University College of Architecture
The “soil” blanketing the moon’s surface isn’t actually soil.
It’s a fine, lethal, abrasive powder of shattered rock and jagged glass that shreds gaskets, chews through seals and hangs in an airless environment blasted by unfiltered radiation and temperature swings that can warp steel.
Scientists call it lunar regolith.
To engineers and the space community, lunar regolith is one of the most hostile construction materials in the human story.
To researchers at Texas A&M University, it’s the raw material for humanity’s next frontier of a permanent lunar settlement.
With NASA’s unveiling of its new Lunar Innovation Park — a base designed to support human presence and operations in the lunar environment — Texas A&M is emerging as a key player in the agency’s most urgent challenge: how to do construction on the moon.
“We are moving past the era of ‘flags and footprints,’” said Dr. Patrick Suermann, professor of construction science at the College of Architecture and retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel. “We have to stop thinking like explorers and start thinking like settlers. That means building with what’s underneath our boots.”
Suermann recently presented his vision and work at the 2026 Earth & Space conference, hosted at the Texas A&M Hotel and Conference Center.
The million-dollar problem
To build a civilization, humans can’t be space tourists carrying their own luggage; future settlers will have to use the resources already on the moon.
“It costs roughly $1 million to $1.3 million per kilogram to ship materials to the moon,” Suermann said.
The economics become even more staggering when scaled.
A 2018 report on lunar architecture estimated that transporting rocket propellant from Earth to the moon costs roughly $10,000 per kilogram. But, if that same fuel was produced on the moon, the estimated cost plummets to just $500, almost 20 times cheaper.
“The high cost of shipping to the moon is the million-dollar problem,” Suermann said. “Every time you can cut the mass of a payload, you save a fortune. That’s why the future depends on building infrastructure from resources already on the moon.”
The command center for the space race
The idea of building on the moon using its own resources sits at the center of a growing collaboration between Texas A&M, private industry and government agency partners.
Helping spearhead this effort is the Texas A&M Space Institute led by Dr. Robert Ambrose, professor of mechanical engineering at the College of Engineering.
Backed by a historic $200 million investment from the Texas Legislature and situated next door to the Johnson Space Center in Houston, the institute is designed to be the nation’s premier hub for off-world research, robotics and testing.
“One of the most exciting features of the 240-acre facility is it’s two-and-a-half acre testing areas: one replicating the surface of the moon, the other Mars,” Suermann said.
The institute simulates the brutal realities of extraterrestrial construction, while ushering in a new generation of robotics, autonomous systems and space rovers through a direct pipeline from the Robotics and Automation Design (RAD) Lab.
But the Texas A&M Space Institute is more than a research campus, it’s a hub of innovation.
“It isn’t just a facility,” Suermann said. “It’s a place to get young investigators and the next generation of researchers excited and prepared to tackle the biggest challenges in space exploration.”
The lunar foreman
While the institute provides the landscape, the Construction Automation, Safety and Education (CASE) Lab led by Dr. Gilles Albeaino, assistant professor of construction science at the College of Architecture, focuses on the industrial “brain” of future lunar construction.
Here, researchers are pioneering the use of mixed reality, or how humans and machines will work together as partners, rather than simple remote-controlled tools.
Future lunar construction sites may look like scenes from a science fiction movie: rovers hauling regolith across the moon’s surface, robotic arms printing walls layer by layer, and engineers on Earth overseeing operations through VR headsets.
“On the moon, construction operations will depend on semi-autonomous robotic systems,” Suermann said. “The CASE lab is leading research into how humans and machines can work together in environments where humans can’t safely do everything themselves.”
That challenge is magnified on the moon. There is no natural shielding from radiation, temperatures swing violently between lunar night and day, dust can permeate equipment, and even simple repairs become high-risk operations.
“Every tool matters. Every ounce of material you ship matters,” Suermann said. “So, the question becomes: how do you use the environment itself as your supply chain, and how can you augment machines to become your partner in austere environments?”
From the Arctic to Afghanistan
For Suermann, the lessons shaping lunar construction don’t just stem from his academic endeavors in modeling and designing informatics and building sciences. They also come from two decades spent serving in some of Earth’s harshest environments.
Before joining Texas A&M in 2017, Suermann served in the U.S. Air Force, deploying to isolated regions like Guam and Greenland.
His mission? Build sustainable infrastructure and bases that support military operations.
“My experiences in serving the U.S. Air Force were formative, and transformative,” Suermann said. “It taught me a great deal about construction, and that what can go wrong will go wrong.”
One deployment in Afghanistan left a particularly lasting impression. He led a joint military operation for the building of a runway and base in the middle of a desert no-man’s-land.
“The sand was this fine, talcum-like, powdered mesh,” Suermann said. “Hidden under it were these massive boulders.”
The construction logistics were a nightmare. To Suermann, though, it was an exciting engineering expedition — a strangely familiar feeling to the challenges researchers now face in planning for lunar expeditions.
“It shows, to me, that lunar regolith isn’t too dissimilar from the terrain we have here on Earth,” Suermann said. “At the end of the day, construction is construction.”
Today, Suermann is passing that expeditionary spirit to mission partners, academic collaborators and a new generation of Aggies.
In the halls of the College of Architecture, his expertise plays an interdisciplinary symphony across engineering, management and technology — conducting a scientific tune where theories meet impactful discoveries and applications.
“The beauty of construction folks is that we take the ideas that live in computer simulations and make them come to life,” Suermann said. “It’s not an assembly line; it’s ideas that we turn into universal applications. To lead the future, you have to know how things are done now.”
As NASA moves toward its 2040 goal for a permanent lunar base, the Aggie mission remains clear: not just to visit the moon, but to stay there. And they’re building that future one layer of lunar regolith at a time.
Scenes during Dr. Patrick Suermann’s deployment to Afghanistan with the U.S. Air Force, where he led the building of infrastructure and bases to support military operations. The construction logistics were a nightmare. To Suermann, though, it was an exciting engineering expedition — a strangely familiar feeling to the challenges researchers now face in planning for lunar expeditions
Scenes during Dr. Patrick Suermann’s deployment to Afghanistan with the U.S. Air Force, where he led the building of infrastructure and bases to support military operations. The construction logistics were a nightmare. To Suermann, though, it was an exciting engineering expedition — a strangely familiar feeling to the challenges researchers now face in planning for lunar expeditions.
Researchers at Texas A&M are designing the blueprint for sustained human presence, and settlement, on the moon. Future lunar construction sites may look like scenes from a science fiction movie: rovers hauling regolith across the moon’s surface, robotic arms printing walls layer by layer, and engineers on Earth overseeing operations through VR headsets.
Credit
Dr. Patrick Suermann/Texas A&M University College of Architecture
