Thursday, April 20, 2023

UK to ignore ECHR rulings on small boats ‘after Sunak caves in to Tory right’

Story by Rajeev Syal and Nadeem Badshah • The Guardian 
Yesterday 

Rishi Sunak has caved in to demands from hard-right MPs to allow the UK to ignore rulings from the European court of human rights on small boat crossings, government sources have said.


Photograph: Ben Stansall/AFP/Getty Images

Backbench rebels have been pushing the prime minister to harden the illegal migration bill so ministers to can ignore interim rulings. One of the Strasbourg court’s rule 39 injunctions blocked the government’s first attempt to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda last year.

These so-called interim measures are typically used to suspend an expulsion or extradition, often by asylum seekers who fear persecution if they are returned to their home country.

Between 2020 and 2022, the ECHR granted 12 of 161 applications for interim measures against the UK government.

After days of wrangling with rightwing MPs, government sources claim that an amendment to the new law will empower the home secretary to “disregard” interim rule 39 orders. Suella Braverman, the home secretary, was a key figure in landing the breakthrough, according to the Times.

Another proposed change to the legislation will enshrine in law that the only way to stop a deportation of refused asylum seekers or criminals is by persuading a British judge that it would lead to “serious and irreversible harm”, the sources claimed.

The Home Office is due to publish its own amendments to the bill on Thursday before it returns to the House of Commons for the next stage of debates and votes next week.

The bill will introduce measures that will bar anyone who arrives in the UK illegally from claiming asylum and allow them to be detained and removed.

A group of hardline MPs had been pushing for a much tougher approach to rulings from the Strasbourg court while remaining in the European Convention of Human Rights.

In a meeting with the Common Sense Group of Tory MPs on Tuesday, the prime minister was said to have resisted committing to ignore rulings from judges in Strasbourg, which have led to the Rwanda removals plan being stalled.

But according to several of those present, Sunak told them he had “skin in the game, too” and was staking his own premiership on an unequivocal commitment to stop the boats.

A source close to the group said they realised the legislation “needs to be acceptable” to moderate backbenchers.

One of the rebel ringleaders, Danny Kruger, told the i newspaper: “My colleagues and I are grateful to the home secretary and prime minister for their work to secure most of the changes … we asked for.”

Simon Hart, the government chief whip, had argued against offering concessions to appease the rebels, the Times said. Hart said ministers should instead table their amendments as there was no risk of being defeated, after estimating that fewer than two dozen Tories would hold out, a government source told the newspaper.

Removing the UK altogether from the ECHR, the rights of which were incorporated into UK law in 1998 with the Human Rights Act, is viewed as problematic as the court was an integral part of the Good Friday agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland.

In a separate disagreement at prime minister’s questions on Wednesday, Sunak claimed the Welsh government’s plans to pay asylum seekers £1,600 a month in basic income showed Labour is “paying” for small boats to cross the Channel.

He appeared to suggest the proposals to offer young asylum seekers who settle in Wales access to an ongoing basic income pilot could incentivise people-smuggling. The two-year pilot is open to care leavers.

Sunak’s criticism comes after ministers reportedly blocked a Welsh government request for young migrants to receive free legal aid. A Welsh government spokesperson said: “We believe that care leavers have a right to be properly supported as they develop into independent young adults.

“Too many young people leaving care continue to face significant barriers to achieving a successful transition into adulthood than many of their peers.

“In line with our nation of sanctuary approach, we want to ensure that unaccompanied asylum-seeking children are supported to rebuild their lives and are not prevented from accessing appropriate Welsh government schemes and benefits to support their integration.”

It comes after Home Office figures on Tuesday revealed that 5,049 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel so far this year. About 113 individuals were detected in three boats on Monday, suggesting an average of about 38 people per boat.
Anti-Vaxxer RFK Jr. Takes Aim at Joe Biden in More Ways Than One
ON 4/6/23 

President Joe Biden has gained another potential opponent for the 2024 presidential race.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nephew of former President John F. Kennedy and son of former Senator Robert F. Kennedy, filed a statement of candidacy Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission, reported the Associated Press (AP). Kennedy is running as a Democrat.

Kennedy is an environmental lawyer and bestselling author, making a name for himself in the anti-vaccine movement, including launching the nonprofit Children's Health Defense, an activist group denouncing vaccine efficacy.

Kennedy has been particularly vocal since the rise of the COVID-19 pandemic and the development of the COVID vaccine. In January 2022, he appeared as guest speaker at the Defeat the Mandates protest in Washington, D.C., a demonstration that coincided with other anti-vaccine protest groups that had ties with conspiracy theorist organizations like QAnon.


Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, speaks during a protest against COVID-19 restrictions and government policy on August 29, 2020, in Berlin, Germany. Kennedy on Wednesday filed to run for the 2024 presidential election as a Democrat.
SEAN GALLUP/GETTY IMAGES

Last month, Kennedy, alongside the Children's Health Defense, took legal action against Biden and several other federal officials for allegedly encouraging platforms like TwitterFacebook and Google to censor "constitutionally protected speech." The 59 defendants in Kennedy's class-action suit include Karine Jean-Pierre, White House press secretary, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Andrew Slavitt, Biden's former senior COVID-19 adviser.

Kennedy is also suing the Department of Justice, the FBI and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

According to the 120-page lawsuit, Kennedy argues that the federal government purposely suppressed "facts" that it "does not want the public to hear" on topics relating to COVID-19, the 2020 presidential election and the New York Post's 2020 article about Hunter Biden's laptop.



Kennedy also filed a lawsuit in January against the Trust News Initiative, launched by the BBC in partnership with several other media outlets to combat vaccine misinformation. The complaint—which lists the BBC, The Washington Post, Reuters and AP as defendants—alleges that these media organizations broke antitrust laws by working with companies like Twitter, Meta and Google, and claims that the media outlets "censored, de-monetized, demoted, throttled, shadow-banned, and/or excluded" other online news publishers listed as plaintiffs alongside Kennedy.

In 2021, Kennedy released the book The Real Anthony Fauci as an attack on the former top infectious-disease doctor, claiming that he enabled "a historic coup d'etat against Western democracy." He also released a book this year titled The Wuhan Cover-Up, which accuses U.S. officials of plotting with China to hide the origins of COVID-19.

The Biden administration has already faced heavy attacks from House Republicans over allegedly censoring social media users from spreading misinformation, including on topics like the COVID-19 vaccine and Hunter Biden's laptop. Ohio Representative Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has also launched several investigations into the "weaponization" of the federal government, dedicating a new committee to the effort.

Biden has yet to announce if he is running for another term in 2024, although doing so could hypothetically pin him against former President Donald Trump in a rematch of the 2020 election. Spiritual adviser and author Marianne Williamson was the first major Democrat to launch her election campaign last month.

Newsweek has reached out to the White House via email for comment.

Anti-vaccine activist RFK Jr. launches presidential campaign



BOSTON (AP) — Anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. launched his longshot bid to challenge President Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination next year.


Anti-vaccine activist RFK Jr. launches presidential campaign

Kennedy, a member of one of the country’s most famous political families who has in recent years been linked to some far-right figures, kicked off his campaign in Boston on Wednesday and likened his campaign to the American revolution.

“My mission over the next 18 months of this campaign and throughout my presidency will be to end the corrupt merger of state and corporate power that is threatening now to impose a new kind of corporate feudalism in our country,” Kennedy said.

Self-help author Marianne Williamson is also running for the Democratic nomination. Biden has said he's planning on running again but has not formally announced a campaign. He's expected to have a glide path to the nomination, with much of the Democratic establishment behind him.

Kennedy, a nephew of President John F. Kennedy and the son of his slain brother Robert F. Kennedy, both of whom he repeatedly referenced during his lengthy speech Wednesday.

Kennedy Jr. was once known most as an environmental lawyer who worked on issues such as clean water. But over the past nearly two decades, he's become one of the leading voices of the anti-vaccine movement. His work has been described by members of his own family and public health experts as misleading and dangerous.


Related video: Watch: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Announces 2024 Presidential Campaign (Newsweek)  Duration 1:03  View on Watch



His efforts intensified after the pandemic and development of the COVID-19 vaccine, and an AP investigation in 2021 showed he had linked up with anti-democratic figures and other groups. He has appeared at events pushing the lie that the 2020 presidential election was stolen and with people who cheered or downplayed the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

A photo posted on Instagram showed Kennedy backstage at a July 2021 Reawaken America event with former President Donald Trump’s ally Roger Stone, former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and anti-vaccine profiteer Charlene Bollinger. All three have promoted the lie about the 2020 election being stolen.

Kennedy has been a guest on Infowars, the channel run by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and on the “War Room” podcast hosted by longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon, where he promoted his bestselling 2021 book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” in which he accused the U.S.’s top infectious disease doctor of participating in “a historic coup d’etat against Western democracy."

The AP documented how Kennedy and his anti-vaccine group, Children’s Health Defense, had capitalized on the COVID-19 pandemic – raking in funding and followers in the U.S. and abroad, and doubling its revenue from 2019 to 2020. Researchers have found that the group is among the most influential spreaders of anti-vaccine misinformation, and the AP found traffic to its website had soared.

In the second year of the pandemic, Children’s Health Defense continued its huge growth, according to a more recent filing with charity regulators in California. Revenue more than doubled from $7 million in 2020 to $16 million in 2021.

Facebook and Instagram removed the accounts of Children’s Health Defense for spreading misinformation.

Kennedy has repeatedly invoked Nazis and the Holocaust when talking about measures aimed at mitigating the spread of COVID-19, such as mask requirements and vaccine mandates. He has apologized for some of those comments, including when he suggested that people in 2022 were worse off than Anne Frank, the teenager who died in a Nazi concentration camp after hiding with her family in a secret annex in an Amsterdam house for two years.

Associated Press, The Associated Press

Robert F. Kennedy Jr's Chances of Beating Biden, According to Polls

Story by Katherine Fung • Yesterday

Robert F Kennedy Jr., speaks during a campaign event to launch his 2024 presidential bid, at the Boston Park Plaza in Boston, Massachusetts, on April 19, 2023.
© Joseph Prezioso/AFP/Getty

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced his long-shot bid for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination on Wednesday.

President Joe Biden is expected to run for re-election but has not made a formal announcement.

Polls show Biden has a double-digit lead over other possible candidates, except for one.

President Joe Biden has yet to officially announce that he's running for re-election, but Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is already challenging Biden for the Democratic presidential nomination.

On Wednesday, Kennedy announced his long-shot bid for 2024 and launched his campaign from Boston, where he spoke about his father's 1968 campaign, his criticisms of the pharmaceutical industry and his career as an environmental lawyer in a nearly two-hour speech.

Kennedy, the nephew of former President John F. Kennedy and son of former U.S. attorney general and assassinated 1968 presidential candidate Robert Kennedy, has become well-known as a vocal anti-vaccine activist and leading proponent of COVID-19 misinformation.

Biden is expecting to make his own 2024 announcement soon and is widely expected to enter the primary as the clear favorite. Early polling shows the president with double-digit leads over other possible Democratic candidates, including Kennedy, self-help author and 2024 candidate Marianne Williamson, Vice President Kamala Harris, Senator Bernie Sanders and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.


NewsweekWatch: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Announces 2024 Presidential Campaign
1:03


Cover MediaRobert F. Kennedy Jr. Is Running for President
1:23


DailymotionJFK’s nephew Robert F Kennedy Jr announces bid for presidential nomination
1:30


Although one recent poll showed that a number of Biden voters are prepared to swing to Kennedy, the president fares well in a hypothetical matchup against the political newcomer. The only name that could close that gap into single digits has been former First Lady Michelle Obama, who has not signaled any plans to run for the White House.

In a USA Today/Suffolk University poll conducted Saturday through Tuesday, 14 percent of Biden's 2020 supporters said they would vote for Kennedy. Comparably, 67 percent of those voters said they would re-elect Biden, 13 percent remained undecided and 5 percent backed Williamson.

Despite there being an overwhelming number of voters who support a second Biden term, David Paleologos, the director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, said that the survey indicates Democratic voters are receptive to another option.

"In 2020, Joe Biden received more votes than any other president in U.S. history, yet the poll tells us that those same voters are open to other Democrats to wage a spirited primary," Paleologos told USA Today. "Kennedy, although a long shot at this point, starts in double digits and can't be ignored."

Kennedy polled particularly well among 33 percent of Biden supporters who disapprove of Biden's job in the White House and the 35 percent who described Biden's policies as "too liberal."

In response to the poll, TV personality and daughter of the late Senator John McCain Meghan McCain tweeted, "RFK Jr. and all his lunacy antivaxx propaganda has enough support to make very interesting spoilers for Biden..."

However, a poll conducted by Morning Consult earlier this month showed slightly stronger odds for Biden, who had a 60-point lead over Kennedy, 70 to 10 percent. Four percent of those respondents chose Williamson.

Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment.


OUR FAVORITE ASTROLOGY PHENOMENA
Mercury Retrograde Is Here, & Flexibility Is The Key To Surviving It

Story by Elizabeth Gulino • Yesterday 

We all know her, but we all definitely don’t love her: Mercury retrograde. The infamous astrology transit is known to cause mass hysteria, malfunctions, and memes, and it’s something we all should be prepared for. And what better way to buckle up than to have all of the dates — and insights from astrologers — of its upcoming retrogrades in one place?


Mercury 

Last year, the Planet of Communication went retrograde four times. This year, we’re thankfully getting a break with just three retrograde transits.

Lisa Stardust, astrologer and author of The Love Deck, notes that the retrogrades of 2023 are all happening in earth signs, except for the last retrograde that moves from Capricorn to Sagittarius. “The overall theme is to urge us to find better ways to save money and embrace our self-esteem,” she says. “The focus on earthly matters will urge us to escape our comfort zones and to embrace fresh ideas. It’s time to move forward and to invest our creativity and money in situations that can grow.”

On top of that, relationships will be an important theme during these transits. Stardust says this means that we will be deciding who and what we want in our lives. “If something or someone is not benefiting us, or making us happy, it’s time to cut the cord and to move on,” she says.

Below, find all the dates Mercury will retrograde in 2023 along with insights and advice from astrologers. Happy retrograding!

April 21 to May 14. From April 21 to May 14, Mercury retrograde will occur in the sign of Taurus. The pre-retrograde shadow (which is the time before the retrograde officially kicks off, when we may already start feeling the effects of the movement) will begin on April 7 and the post-retrograde shadow ends on May 31.

The classic Mercury retrograde mishaps — tech issues, lost emails, misunderstood messages — will be the most intense during the beginning of this transit. “This is due to Mercury turning retrograde while being conjunct with Uranus, the Planet of Electricity,” says Narayana Montúfar, senior astrologer for Astrology.com and author of Moon Signs: Unlock Your Inner Luminary Power. “On the positive side, this combination can help us come up with new solutions to old problems.”

Related video: 
Mercury Is High, Planets And The Moon & Lyrid Meteors In April 2023 Skywatching (Space)
What's up for April? Mercury Rising,
Duration 4:31 View on Watch


While we often try to look on the bright side when it comes to Mercury’s retrograde transit, we have to warn you that this one in particular is gearing up to be a bumpy ride. “The fact that this retrograde overlaps with the first eclipse season of 2023 will make it more annoying, but also more powerful,” says Montúfar. “What Mercury retrograde and eclipse season have in common is that they are very transformative, so we can expect to be stretched and triggered. However, we will also be given the opportunity to evolve out of negative patterns as well as situations.”

To really evolve during this time, though, we must be flexible. “Taurus is a very fixed sign and often resistant to changes, while Mercury is all about changes,” says Iva Naskova, astrologer at the Nebula app. “Therefore, this transit tends to lead to a pitfall due to the Taurian energy. This means you should prepare to have a bit of a struggle with staying in your comfort zone opposed to moving forward toward something new.” You may be feeling indecisive during this transit, but don’t let it frustrate you. Again, flexibility is the key here, so go with the flow, roll with the punches, move to the music — you get the drill — and you’ll be able to come out on the other side unscathed.

Stardust says that the focus of this retrograde will be on relationships and finances — both of which are major areas for Taurus. “Exes may come back, emotions could erupt or change, and we could have to start a savings plan and watch our spending,” she says. This is not a time to indulge — although that’s what Taurus loves to do — so empty your online shopping carts that are full to the brim and save that splurge for another day.

Stephanie Campos, astrologer and author of Seasons of the Zodiac: Love, Magick, and Manifestation Throughout the Astrological Year, agrees. “Whatever you buy may arrive with a side of disappointment or simply just take forever to get to you,” she says. “In general our finances may also experience some sort of delays or setbacks. Mercury’s retrograde in Taurus may have us readjusting our budget or waiting for a check or reimbursement that’s overdue.”

When it comes to love, Campos says we may be tasked with looking at the value systems within our closest relationships. She says we need to ask ourselves if those systems align with our current partners, and if there are conversations that need to be had. “Addressing any unspoken tension within our partnerships is certainly on the menu under this retrograde,” she says.

Although Mercury retrogrades often cause havoc, there’s an upside to this particular planetary backspin. “The most important day to look out for is May 1, when the sun and Mercury retrograde connect, creating an aspect called cazimi,” says Stardust. “In this case, communication will be clear, making it the best day of the retrograde.” You heard her — this is the day of the retrograde when you should plan important meetings, interviews, calls, you name it. Although it’ll still have the tinge of retrograde vibes, it’s the best thing we’ve got until Mercury goes direct on May 14. Until then, good luck!

August 23 to September 15. From August 23 to September 15, Mercury retrograde will occur in the sign of Virgo. The pre-retrograde shadow will begin on August 3 and the post-retrograde shadow ends on September 30.

December 13 to January 1, 2024. The last Mercury retrograde of 2023 is a little different than the previous two, due to the fact that Mercury moves from Capricorn to Sagittarius during its backwards dance (FYI, every single Mercury retrograde from 2022 switched signs, too!). The pre-retrograde shadow will begin on November 25 and the post-retrograde shadow ends on January 20, 2024.

Mark these down on your 2023 calendar so you have an explanation — or at least an excuse — as to why things are all topsy-turvy. But just remember, we’ve been through countless Mercury retrogrades before and we’ll go through even more as we continue on in our lives. They’re not meant to be scary or intimidating — rather, they’re here to redirect us towards a better path. Good luck!

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Your 2023 Tarot Card Reading Is Here

Mercury Retrograde Is Finally Over

Mercury Retrograde Doesn't Deserve All The Hate

  - - -     


WHOSE DATA? OUR DATA!
Reddit set to capitalize on years of data valuable to AI companies

Story by MobileSyrup • Tuesday

Social media platform Reddit, popular for its user-generated forums and content, has announced that it will begin charging companies for access to its application program interface (API).


Reddit set to capitalize on years of data valuable to AI companies© Provided by MobileSyrup

Reddit launched in 2005 and has since collected a vast amount of human interactions and conversations. Eighteen years’ worth of conversations, to be precise, make it a valuable data bank for companies looking to train their AI models.

Reddit doesn’t want other companies to be able to train their LLMs with its data for free, and wants a slice of the pie. Big names like Google and OpenAI have been using Reddit to provide initial guidance to their AI services. In response, Reddit is now introducing a new premium access point for third parties to access Reddit’s APIs, with pricing expected to be split into tiers based on company size.

“Our Reddit Data API will still be open for reasonable and appropriate use cases and accessible via our Developer Platform, which is designed to help developers improve the core Reddit experience,” wrote Reddit in a blog post.

As AI continues to grow, more and more companies will be looking for access to valuable data sources like Reddit to train their models. The move to charge companies for API access is not unexpected, given the increasing demand for data to train these models. Further, rumours point to Reddit going public sometime this year, so introducing a new revenue stream makes sense for the company.
Could Hitler have faked his own death and fled to South America?

THE FIRST POST WWII CONSPIRACY THEORY I GREW UP WITH,

[FOLLOWED QUICKLY BY UFO'S OF THE ATOMIC/SPACE AGE OF THE LATE FORTIES AND THEN THE FIFTIES]

EVERY MENS MAGAZINE OF THE TIME (WELL THUMBED AT THE LOCAL BARBERSHOP) REPEATED THIS FAKE STORY


Story by Stars Insider • Yesterday 


1 of 30 Photos in Gallery 
This conspiracy theory, which many believe to be true, is based on the belief that Adolf Hitler was able to flee the city of Berlin in 1945 with the help of his wife, Eva Braun. Although not taken seriously by historians, this theory has only gained traction since the advent of the internet, a breeding ground for speculation and suspicion.

In this gallery you'll get to know the theory in detail.





The Red Cross Challenged Gamers To Not Commit War Crimes

Story by Isaiah Colbert • Yesterday 

The International Committee of the Red Cross has partnered up with a bunch of Twitch streamers to encourage gamers to not commit war crimes in popular shooters like Call of Duty. The ICRC hopes that its event, “Play by the Rules,” will educate players on the statutes of actual war. The organization has even created its own Fortnite mode to help communicate what those rules are.


A promotional image shows field medics covering behind barricades on the ICRC's Fortnite island.© Image: Epic Games

Read More: War Crimes in Video Games Draw Red Cross Scrutiny

“Every day, people play games set in conflict zones right from their couch. But right now, armed conflicts are more prevalent than ever,” the ICRC website said. “And to the people suffering from their effects, this conflict is not a game. It destroys lives and leaves communities devastated. Therefore, we’re challenging you to play FPS by the real Rules of War, to show everyone that even wars have rules—rules which protect humanity on battlefields IRL.”


As part of the event, on the ICRC’s official Twitch channel streamers have played a number of games while adhering (or attempting to adhere) to the Laws of Conflict, including PUBG Battlegrounds, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Warzone, Rainbow 6 Siege, and Escape From Tarkov. In addition to the Play by the Rules event, the ICRC created its own Fortnite mode that’s designed to convey the rules of war in the context of competitive play.


For those curious, the official rules of war for the ICRC’s Play by the Rules event (which have been streamlined to account for video game mechanics) are:

No thirsting (don’t shoot downed/unresponsive enemies)

No targeting non-violent NPCs

No targeting civilian buildings

Use med kits on everyone




ICRC

This isn’t the first time the ICRC has urged players to critically think about the rules of war. Back in 2017, the ICRC hosted a similar event in an Arma III DLC called Law of War. In Law of War, gamers put down their weapons and took on the role of humanitarian workers as they respond to people in crisis, deactivate mines, and speak with an investigative journalist. According to a blog post from Arma III developer Bohemia Interactive, the DLC raised a total of $176,667, which it donated to the ICRC. 
Exclusive-German authors, performers call for tougher ChatGPT rules amid copyright concerns

Story by By Foo Yun Chee • Yesterday 

FILE PHOTO: Illustration shows ChatGPT logo© Thomson Reuters

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Forty-two German associations and trade unions representing more than 140,000 authors and performers on Wednesday urged the European Union to beef up draft artificial intelligence rules as they singled out the threat to their copyright from ChatGPT.

Trade unions for the creative sector Verdi and DGB and associations for photographers, designers, journalists and illustrators set out their concerns in a letter to the European Commission, European Council and EU lawmakers.

The letter underlined the growing worries about generative artificial intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT which can mimic humans and create text and images based on prompts.

"The unauthorised usage of protected training material, its non-transparent processing, and the foreseeable substitution of the sources by the output of generative AI raise fundamental questions of accountability, liability and remuneration, which need to be addressed before irreversible harm occurs," the letter seen by Reuters said.

"Generative AI needs to be at the centre of any meaningful AI market regulation," it said.

The European Commission, which last year proposed AI rules, will in the coming months thrash out the final details with EU lawmakers and member states before the rules become legislation.

The rules should be beefed up to regulate generative AI across the entire product cycle, especially on providers of foundation models, the groups said.

They also call for providers of such technology to be liable for all content generated and disseminated by the AI, in particular for infringement of personal rights and copyrights, misinformation or discrimination.

The letter said providers of foundation models such as Microsoft, Alphabet's Google, Amazon and Meta Platforms should not be allowed to operate central platform services to distribute digital content.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Mark Potter)
Cost of carbon emissions nearly five times higher than previously thought: analysis

Story by The Canadian Press • Yesterday 


OTTAWA — The economic cost of greenhouse gas emissions is nearly five times higher than previously thought, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault said Wednesday.


Cost of carbon emissions nearly five times higher than previously thought: analysis© Provided by The Canadian Press

The minister told attendees at a climate change conference in Ottawa that the government used updated scientific knowledge and economic models to revise the way it evaluates how much climate change is costing Canadians.

The new numbers have been in development for months but come after a recent report from the parliamentary budget officer on the economic costs of the carbon price. That report did not specifically equate the cost of the price on carbon to the costs of climate change itself.

"The updates to the social cost of carbon simply show that every tonne of greenhouse gas is costing the economy more," Guilbeault said at the Net Zero Leadership Summit.

The social cost of carbon estimates the financial impact that every tonne of emissions has on everything from food production and human health to disaster repair bills and even property values.

The idea is that growing emissions contribute more to global warming, and every increase in global average temperatures can increase the number and severity of extreme weather events.

More than seven years ago an analysis estimated that by 2020 the cost would be about $54 a tonne in 2020. Guilbeault said the updated model suggests that figure was actually closer to $247.

He said this year it's even higher, at $261 per tonne of emissions, and by 2030 it will rise to $294.



Related video: Down-to-Earth Design: Rethinking Carbon in a Circular Economy (CNBC)   Duration 10:34  View on Watch

"Pause for a moment to understand what this signifies," Guilbeault said.

"Every tonne of carbon we reduce this year saves society as a whole $261 — and we are talking in terms of cutting megatonnes: millions of tonnes."

Between 2005 — the year Canada uses as the base for its 2030 emissions targets — and 2021, Canada eliminated 62 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. Using the new social cost of carbon figure, that equates to saving almost $10 billion.

However that doesn't include an estimate of what it cost to eliminate those 62 million tonnes. The carbon price in 2021 was $40 per tonne, and it will rise to $170 per tonne in 2030.

Last year a federal analysis of regulations to reduce emissions produced from gasoline and diesel said the cost of that policy was about $151 per tonne.

Canada's Ecofiscal Commission in 2017 pegged the cost of Quebec's electric vehicle subsidy at about $355 per tonne. Most provinces and the federal government now have some kind of electric vehicle subsidy.

By 2030, Canada wants to eliminate at least another 231 million tonnes. That could save $68 billion on the emissions side, but there are no direct comparisons to illustrate how much it will cost to do that.

Canada has dozens of other policies designed to help meet that target, including phasing out coal power, expanding renewable electricity, mandating an end to the sale of gas-powered cars and capping emissions from the oil and gas industry.

The parliamentary budget officer's recent analysis of carbon pricing said the government's climate rebates are more than the direct cost of carbon pricing for most families, but when you factor in the economic costs — such as lower incomes or job losses — many families may have less money in 2030 than they would without the carbon price.

Guilbeault and others criticized that report for not being explicit that climate change itself is contributing to job losses and lower incomes.

The social cost of carbon analysis is done in concert with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which published its interim values last year but is still reviewing them before releasing a final version. Canada published its final numbers Wednesday.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 19, 2023.

Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press
CANADA
'Keira's Law' passes Senate, signalling a change to the way courts approach domestic violence

Story by Jessica Mundie • 

A private member's bill requiring that judges consider domestic violence and coercive control when issuing decisions passed the Senate on Tuesday evening.

Bill C-233, which was sponsored by Liberal MP Anju Dhillon, was introduced in February 2022. It was dubbed "Keira's Law" after four-year-old Keira Kagan, who was found dead with her father at the bottom of a cliff outside of Toronto in 2020.

Keira's mother, Jennifer Kagan-Viater, said at a press conference on Wednesday morning that she tried to call attention to the danger her daughter's father presented to their child well before their death.

She said she went to court to seek protection for Keira from the violent and coercive behaviour of her ex-husband Robin Brown.


"When we went to trial in my matter, I was before a judge with a background in labour and employment law and he cut me off on the stand when I was talking about domestic violence and parenting and the effect on our daughter." said Kagan-Viater.

"[The judge] said domestic violence is not relevant to parenting."


Kagan-Viater had been separated from Brown for years before her daughter's death.

She has told CBC News that she believes her daughter's death was the result of a murder-suicide and that her warnings about her ex-husband's abuse were largely ignored by judges.

A pending inquest into Keira's death was announced in February by Ontario's chief coroner.


Keira Kagan, 4, was found dead at the base of an Ontario cliff after allegedly going for a hike with her father, Robin Brown, whose body was also found nearby. Her mother, Jennifer Viater-Kagan and stepfather, Phillip Viater, believe it was a murder-suicide.
© Evan Mitsui/CBC

"We need to see a change in the way that judges understand domestic violence and coercive control, and this bill brings about that change," said Kagan-Viater.


Bill C-233 would amend the Judges Act to establish seminars for judges on intimate partner violence and coercive control, in addition to other forms of education they must undergo.

Pamela Cross is a lawyer and advocacy director at Luke's Place, which provides legal guidance to women leaving abusive relationships. She said she hopes the bill will lead to standardized education for judges on the effects of intimate partner violence on children.

She said judges who hear cases where family violence is a factor should be well-educated about how domestic violence works, how it affects kids and how often it continues after separation. She said "Keira's Law" is a good step in this direction.

An important aspect of Bill C-233, said Cross, is its focus on coercive control — a pattern of abusive behaviour that isolates a victim and causes them to lose their sense of autonomy.

Cross said that cases of coercive control may not involve physical violence. They may instead involve emotional abuse, psychological abuse, gaslighting, or financial abuse, she added.

Cross said Kagan-Viater's experience is not uncommon.


Too often, she said, women go to court after being abused by their partners and are not believed by judges — or judges fail to make the connection between intimate partner violence and its effects on children.

"Once this bill is fully implemented, judges should have more tools in their toolkit so that they can look at these cases and make decisions that are best for children and that also keep mothers safe," said Cross.

Pam Damhoff, one of the Liberal MPs spearheading the bill, said "Keira's Law" may inspire similar legislation at the provincial level.

"Kira was going to change the world and we're here today because she has changed the world. She is starting conversations, not only with our bill federally but across the country," said Damhoff.

Along with amending the Judges Act, the bill also amends the Criminal Code to allow a judge to consider ordering someone charged with intimate partner violence to wear an electronic monitoring device if they think the individual may pose a safety or security risk.

Liberal MP Ya'ara Saks, another supporter of the bill, said the option of electronic monitoring, paired with new training on intimate partner violence and coercive control, will give judges "a comprehensive toolbox of understanding" for dealing with these types of cases.

"We want to make sure that Keira's legacy is one that will protect more children in the future," said Saks.
After tens of thousands of federal workers walk off the job, Trudeau calls for more negotiations

Story by John Paul Tasker • 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is urging the union representing striking federal public servants to quickly hash out a deal to avoid serious service disruptions.

Speaking to reporters ahead of a Liberal caucus meeting Wednesday, Trudeau said the government tabled an offer Monday but the union, the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), hasn't meaningfully responded to it.

PSAC announced late Tuesday that more than 100,000 workers would walk off the job after it failed to reach a deal with Ottawa on a new collective agreement after months of negotiations.

"Obviously, Canadians have a right and deserve to get the services that they need from the federal government," Trudeau said.

"That's why we need both management and labour to get back to the bargaining table as soon as possible to continue to make progress.

"Right now, they need to get back to the table because they haven't been over the past number of hours."

PSAC national president Chris Aylward said Wednesday his union is at the table trying to reach a deal — something he said won't happen until "the government is ready to come to the table with a fair offer."

At issue in this dispute is pay and other workplace issues.

PSAC is demanding a 13.5 per cent pay increase over three years (4.5 per cent annually). Some bargaining units are asking for more than that. For example, tax agency workers want a pay bump of 22.5 per cent.

The Treasury Board Secretariat, the government department that is nominally the employer of bureaucrats, has offered nine per cent over three years.

Treasury Board Secretary Mona Fortier said PSAC has made unreasonable demands that aren't fiscally sustainable.

She said the government isn't willing to sign a "blank cheque" to cover what she described as outlandish wage increases.

Ottawa's nine per cent wage hike was endorsed by the Public Interest Commission (PIC), an independent mediator, Fortier said, and the government isn't willing to go higher.

PSAC also wants more flexibility in the rules on working from home — and they want the right to "telework" enshrined in a final agreement.

The government has demanded that public servants return to in-person work for a few days a week after years of COVID-related virtual work. That hasn't gone over well with public sector unions.


People line up outside a Service Canada office in Toronto on Apr. 26, 2022 to apply for passports. Families Minister Karina Gould, the minister responsible for the passport program, says PSAC's job action could lead to more processing delays.© Evan Mitsui/CBC

Families Minister Karina Gould, the minister responsible for the passport program, said the job action will result in delays to services Canadians rely on to travel.

In fact, she said, regular passport applications will not be processed while the strike is underway — a development that could lead to a serious backlog.

Related video: 'We are at the negotiating table:' Trudeau on first PSAC strike day (cbc.ca)
Duration 0:45 View on Watch
More videos

The passport program receives about 85,000 applications a week and they won't be considered while most of the staff are out on a picket line, Gould said.

Passport Canada will only be able to process "humanitarian" applications and a select number of "urgent" applications, she said.

CRA services will be 'delayed or unavailable'

"If job action wraps up quickly, it won't have a big impact. If it goes for quite some significant time, then it will," Gould said. "If it's a couple of days or maybe a week, people will experience delays."

Asked what her message is for families who may see their vacation plans ruined by a dormant bureaucracy, Gould said she feels "very terrible for them."

"I think, like all of my colleagues, we're hopefully going to come to a negotiated agreement with PSAC expeditiously so the impact on Canadians is minimal," she added.

Immigration Minister Sean Fraser said it won't be business as usual at his department either.

He said the Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) will essentially stop processing most applications for the time being.

He said the timing is bad because the department had just started to chip away away its massive backlog of nearly a million applications, which piled up during the pandemic.

The Canada Revenue Agency also warned taxpayers that its services "will be delayed or unavailable" — which is bad timing, given the deadline to file taxes is April 30 (or June 15 if you're self-employed).

In a statement, the CRA said benefits payments will be prioritized and Canada child benefit (CCB) payments will still go out as scheduled.

Call centre operations will be limited during this job action, the CRA said.

In announcing the strike action, PSAC said Canadians can expect "a complete halt of the tax season."

But the CRA tax returns filed digitally should see fewer issues.

"While there are no plans to extend tax filing deadlines, the CRA will continue to accept all tax returns. Those that are filed digitally, which represent the vast majority of T1 and T2 returns, will largely be processed automatically by our systems without delay," the agency said.

Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu said she's already heard from some First Nations chiefs worried about the department's operations during the strike. The federal government provides many frontline services to status Indians.

"I'm going to be monitoring this really closely," Hajdu said. "The department has an operational plan to continue to provide services. Frontline services won't be affected."

Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie, the critic for the Treasury Board, ducked questions Wednesday about whether her party would support back-to-work legislation to force federal workers back on the job.

She said Trudeau is to blame for the job action. "We're calling on the prime minister and the Liberal government to get their act together and end this strike," she said. "It's his incompetence that has brought us to this place."

She said the longer the strike goes on, the more Canadians will suffer.

"Canadians won't receive their passports. Canadians will not receive their tax returns as a result of the incompetence of this Liberal government," she said.



NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh joins PSAC workers on a picket line in Ottawa, Wednesday, April 19, 2023.© Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh joined some PSAC workers on the picket line early Wednesday.

Singh has said the NDP will never support back-to-work legislation.

"We envision that there might be a scenario where the government would bring in back-to-work legislation. They've done it in the past and I said really clearly to them that we will never support that," Singh said.


"I looked directly at the prime minister and said, 'We're a workers' party, we're not going to support back-to-work legislation. Never consider that as an option for us, because we're not going to do that.'"