Friday, February 21, 2025

 

Council of Nicaea 1700 years ago: ‘Images of God turned upside down’



Cluster of Excellence "Religion and Politics"
Michael Seewald, Professor of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma at the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the University of Münster, and speaker of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’ 

image: 

Michael Seewald, Professor of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma at the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the University of Münster, and speaker of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’

view more 

Credit: Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’



Organised by the Pontifical Gregorian University and the University of Münster, an international conference will take place in Rome next week that focuses on the Council of Nicaea 1700 years ago and its significance today. ‘The first ecumenical council in history formulated a creed that is still fundamental for almost all churches today. It unites Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Christians’, says Michael Seewald, Professor of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma from Münster, who is organising the interdisciplinary conference with his colleague Philipp G. Renczes SJ from the Gregorian University. ‘From today’s perspective, the Council turned conventional images of God upside down: God himself became human in Jesus. That is the main message of the Nicene Creed. Figuratively speaking, God is not only at the very top, but also at the very bottom. As a crucified human, a failed existence – and precisely in his failure does he prove himself to be God. This basic idea from Nicaea left theology intellectually challenging questions’. Because the 1700-year-old Creed is still significant today, the conference will bring together new historical research on the Council as a political event, as well as new research from systematic theology on the dispute over the relationship between God and Jesus. The dispute divided the fledgling Christian church in the Roman empire, which is why Emperor Constantine convened the largest assembly of bishops to date in Nicaea, today Iznik in Turkey, in 325.

The two-part conference is entitled ‘The Confession of the Council of Nicaea: History and Theology’. Leading scholars on Nicaea from the fields of theology, philosophy, philology and history will speak in the first part, from 27 February to 1 March in Rome. The focus of the second part, from 15 to 17 October 2025 in Münster, will be on the question of what the Council means for the relationship between Christianity and Judaism, and Christianity and Islam. ‘Nicaea further separated Jews and Christians. And the idea that Jesus is God is unacceptable from an Islamic point of view. The two parts of the conference in Rome and Münster will contextualise the council as a political event of its time, but also reflect on the controversial matters that were discussed in Nicaea’, explains Seewald.

‘Restrengthening German-Italian theological exchange’

Commenting on the cooperation between the Gregorian University, which is run by the Society of Jesus, and the Faculty of Theology at the University of Münster, Seewald says: ‘It is gratifying that this tandem is reviving the exchange between German-speaking and Italian theology. The fact that the Pope has invited the conference participants to a personal meeting and discussion speaks to the importance that he attaches to the anniversary of the Council, but also to the conference with the high quality of its participants. We hope very much of course that the Pope will regain his health soon’. Seewald highlights the fact that both university institutions have a long tradition in the history of theology, while also dealing with contemporary issues of the Christian faith in different regional, linguistic and cultural contexts. ‘Both look beyond their own confessional and national borders’. The Gregorian is world-renowned for Catholic theology, while the Catholic Faculty of Theology in Münster is the largest theological faculty at a state university in the world.

‘What today’s church members actually believe is another matter’

The Council of Nicaea in 325 sought to establish a binding creed to settle the dispute that had escalated in the Roman empire over the relationship between God and Jesus, and to bring about unity. As Michael Seewald explains, the assembly finally decided that ‘Jesus Christ is of the same substance as God the Father, that is, in the full sense God – not just originating diffusely from the sphere of the divine’. Referred to as the ‘ecumenical’ council, it thus concerned ‘the entire inhabited world’. However, most of the participants were bishops from the Greek-speaking East. ‘Theologically, that is where the action was in the 4th century’.

As for the significance of the Council for people today, Seewald says: ‘The major Christian churches all recognise the Nicene Creed, with some later additions. What the members of these churches actually believe is another matter. Most believers today probably cannot be mapped onto the theological landscape of the 4th century’. While the conflicting groups at the time agreed that Jesus Christ ‘was not simply a human being’, many Christians today probably think that ‘Jesus was a remarkable man who was deified in perhaps an exaggerated way only retrospectively’. This only took hold in Christian theology in the 18th century. ‘By contrast, the theology of the ancient church cultivated a highly developed speculative Christology’. The Council could be of interest for non-Christians today for another reason: ‘The varied reception of Nicaea and the role of Emperor Constantine at the Council are a prime example of the interconnection between religion and politics, of the interweaving of religious claims to truth and political interests’.

Responsible for organising the multilingual, simultaneously interpreted conference at the University of Münster is the Chair of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma and the Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’. The two organisers will be speaking in the first part in Rome, alongside the philosopher Anna Marmodoro from Missouri, a world-renowned expert in ancient metaphysics, the philologist Young Richard Kim from Chicago, a specialist in Greek studies and editor of the Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea, and the Italian historian Emanuela Prinzivalli. (vvm/tec)

 

Poster of the conference 'The Confession of the Council of Nicaea: History and Theology' (IMAGE)

Cluster of Excellence "Religion and Politics"



Programme for the two-part international conference ‘The Confession of the Council of Nicaea: History and Theology’

Part I 27 February to 1 March 2025 in Rome, Part II 15 to 17 October 2025 in Münster

https://www.unigre.it/it/eventi-e-comunicazione/eventi/calendario-eventi/the-confession-of-the-council-of-nicea-history-and-theology/pogramma/

https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/religion_und_politik/aktuelles/001-09-40_programm_theconfessionof_digital.pdf

Registration: Journalists interested in attending are kindly requested to register at: religionundpolitik@uni-muenster.de

 

Forensic Sciences Research Volume 9, Issue 4 publishes



Compuscript Ltd
fig 1 

image: 

Dr Carolyne Bird

 

 

view more 

Credit: FSR






https://academic.oup.com/fsr/issue/9/4

Special Issue: Forensic Document Examination

 

This special issue includes an editorial, two review, three research articles and one rapid communication from leading scientists in the field that further the discussion on forensic document examination. Video introductions to the issue by the Guest Editors are available to view at https://youtu.be/cJ1I4E2kfi4 and https://youtu.be/evXCudzoXzw

 

Guest Editors: Carolyne Bird from Forensic Science SA, Adelaide, Australia and Xu Yang of the Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.

 

This special issue showcases research and commentary across a range of forensic document examinations and topics, demonstrating the continued relevance and shifting focus of the field.

The contributions have been made by experts hailing from North America, South America, Europe, and Asia, providing a global snapshot. These articles focus on the frontier issues of handwriting and questioned document examination and contribute fruitful research to the discipline.

 

This special issue of Forensic Sciences Research showcases the work of FDEs worldwide, providing readers with new information and ideas while fostering a stronger sense of community.

 

Articles published in the issue include:

 

Editorial

Forensic document examination: a global snapshot

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owaf001

Carolyne Lindsay Bird and Xu Yang

 

Review Articles

Error mitigation in forensic handwriting examination: the examiner’s perspective

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae065

Nicole Crown, Raymond Marquis, Erich Kupferschmid, Tomasz Dziedzic, Diana Belic, and Dorijan Kerzan

 

I have a question about evaluative reporting: a comprehensive collection of FAQs

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae062

Ronald Brent Ostrum

 

Original Articles

Characterizing pen strokes produced using various commercially available thermochromic inks

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae055

Mario Alejandro Alvarez Cordeiro, and Catalina Gondikas

 

An experimental study on distinguishing gel pen ink stains using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy combined with the K-means algorithm

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae066

Yiting Yuan, Yu Tao, and Da Qin

 

Dynamic signatures: a mathematical approach to analysis

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae067

Jessica Baleiro Okado, Erick Simões da Camara e Silva, and Priscila Dias Sily

 

Rapid Communication

Succeeding together: the power of collaboration between forensic and criminal intelligence

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae054

Maralee Tapps, Ozalée Piat, Audrey-Anne Matte, and Romain Volery

 

Guest Editor Biographies

Carolyne Bird is a practicing forensic document examiner at Forensic Science SA, in Adelaide, Australia, where she commenced employment in 2002. She has a Doctor of Philosophy in Human Bioscience from La Trobe University, Melbourne where her work investigated forensic handwriting examiners' skill in determining disguised and simulated handwriting. She has been involved in several national and international working groups in the areas of education and training, validation, capability mapping and human factors in handwriting examination. Carolyne is the current Vice President of the Australasian Society of Forensic Document Examiners, Inc. She has co-authored twelve peer-reviewed journal articles and authored three book chapter on aspects of forensic document examination.

Xu Yang, is the Vice President of Academy of Forensic Science, China. He has been engaged in scientific research, appraisal, and educational training in the field of forensic science, including material evidence technology. He has presided over or participated in more than 30 national and provincial scientific research projects, presided over or participated in the development of 8 national standards for document examination, and developed more than 20 technical specifications issued by the Ministry of Justice. He has published more than 60 papers and has been the chief editor or co-editor of nearly 20 monographs. He has presided over and participated in projects that have won four Second Prizes for Shanghai Science and Technology Progress. In 2009, he was awarded the title of the First National Advanced Individual in Judicial Appraisal by the Ministry of Justice.

 

# # # # # #

Forensic Sciences Research (FSR) is a publication of the Academy of Forensic Science (AFS), Shanghai, P.R. China, that publishes the latest research in various disciplines of forensic sciences. It aims to promote forensic sciences through quality research articles, reviews, case reports, and letters to editors. The journal has been publishing highly impactful articles and achieving a 1.4 Impact Factor and 3.6 CiteScore (Scopus) while averaging 11 days from submission to first decision. Forensic Sciences Research is indexed in by ESCI, PMC, Scopus, DOAJ, ProQuest, HeinOnline and CSCD.

 

For more information, please visit https://academic.oup.com/fsr

Editorial Board: https://academic.oup.com/fsr/pages/editorial-board

Forensic Sciences Research is available online at https://academic.oup.com/fsr/issue

 

Submissions to Forensic Sciences Research may be made using Editorial Manager® (https://www.editorialmanager.com/tfsr/default.aspx).

 

Usage

263K annual downloads/views

 

Citation metrics

1.4 (2023) Impact Factor

4.7 (2022) CiteScore (Scopus)

Q1 (2022) CiteScore Best Quartile

1.767 (2021) SNIP

0.894 (2021) SJR

 

Speed/acceptance

11 days avg. from submission to first decision

37 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision

74 days avg. from acceptance to online publication

39% acceptance rate

 

Print ISSN: 2096-1790

Online ISSN: 2471-1411


 

Selfhood is a precondition for true community



In his new book Being We, Professor Dan Zahavi shares the results of five years of research into communal experience. He argues that being part of a we requires an experiential anchoring; an identification with the group.



University of Copenhagen - Faculty of Humanities

Professor Dan Zahavi 

image: 

Dan Zahavi is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Copenhagen and director of the Centre for Subjectivity Research. His primary research area is phenomenology and philosophy of mind and their intersection with empirical disciplines such as psychiatry and psychology.

view more 

Credit: University of Copenhagen




Comedian Groucho Marx famously once said that he did not wish to be a member of any club that would accept his membership. Marx’ comment, joking aside, highlights a key aspect of the communal experience; that you cannot be a member of a we, a community, without somehow endorsing that membership yourself.

- By birthright, we may belong to a variety of groups such as class, ethnicity or blood type, but group memberships that can be determined on the basis of objective markers are not particularly useful when trying to understand what it means to be part of a we, says Professor Dan Zahavi from the University of Copenhagen.

Professor Zahavi’s new book Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Social Ontology explores what it takes to constitute a we with others and how being part of a we affects one’s sense of self. He adds:

- It is important to understand that a we is a particular kind of social formation distinguishable from e.g. the ones based purely on shared objective features inasmuch as you can be a member of such a group – possessing citizenship, for example – without ever having decided to. To be part of a we, you have to experience yourself as one of us. It involves subjective endorsement.

Community first?
In many recent scholarly accounts of the collective and the self, however, the collective is considered prior to the individual. Some go even further and claim that the self is nonexistent, but Dan Zahavi is skeptical of such claims:

- There is no doubt that communities and groups are extremely important to the values ​​and beliefs we form over the course of our lives. No one disagrees with that. The problem is that the great importance that communities have for us also leads many to assume that our self-identity depends solely on the group or groups we belong to, says Dan Zahavi and continues:

- But we need to be careful here: While some dimensions of self are clearly social and first established through socialization, a proper appreciation of our experiential life also has to recognize its intrinsic subjectivity. The experiences we as human beings have involve a point of view, they come with perspectival ownership, and this feature is not a social construction.

Selfhood, argues Zahavi, is both what allows us to mark our difference to others and what permits us to share a perspective with them. To deny the self is real is by the very same token to deny the reality of the community.

- In other words, if you eliminate the first-person singular, you also lose the first-person plural.

I, we – and you
Even though one has to identify with a we in order to become a member, it is not, Dan Zahavi points out, sufficient for obtaining membership. Since a we obviously consists of more than one member.

So if we wish to understand what it means to share a belief, an intention, an emotional experience or, more generally, a perspective with others, we also need to look at how we come to understand and relate to others in the first place.

- To understand the nature of a we, it is not enough to look at the relation between I and we. We also have to look at the relationship between the members of a we. And here second-person engagement and the communicative intertwinement it allows for is of crucial importance, says Dan Zahavi and concludes:

- There are, of course, important differences between dyadic kinds of we where the members know each other in person and the kinds of large-scale we, like religious communities or national communities, whose members have never met, but who are nevertheless united via shared rituals, traditions and normative expectations. But the latter would never have become possible were it not for the direct, embodied, experiential sharing that we find in the I-you relationship.

Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Social Ontology has been published by Oxford University Press


About Dan Zahavi
Dan Zahavi is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Copenhagen and director of the Centre for Subjectivity Research. His primary research area is phenomenology and philosophy of mind and their intersection with empirical disciplines such as psychiatry and psychology.

Since 2020, Zahavi has been the principal investigator on two large research projects focusing on the nature of the we, which are supported by the European Research Council and the Carlsberg Foundation. Zahavi’s writings have been translated into more than 30 languages.

TRUMPWORLD

Study: Countries across the world use more land for golf courses than wind or solar energy



IOP Publishing
Some countries allocate more land to golf courses than wind and solar energy 

image: 

Study: Countries across the world use more land for golf courses than wind or solar energy

view more 

Credit: IOP Publishing





Countries across the world use more land for golf courses than wind or solar energy, according to a new study published in the academic journal Environmental Research Communications.

While the land requirements of renewable energy projects are often criticized in public debates, this study highlights a striking contrast: vast areas are allocated to golf courses, which serve a relatively small, often affluent population. The study shows that in countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom, far more land is allocated to golf courses than to renewable energy facilities. In the top ten countries with the most golf courses, an area equivalent to that used for golf could support up to 842 GW of solar and 659 GW of wind capacity—exceeding current installed capacity in many cases.

Golf courses typically require large amounts of water and chemical treatments, leading to a significantenvironmental impact. In contrast, renewable energy installations such as solar farms and wind turbines offer a sustainable land use option while directly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Utility-scale solar farms require approximately 0.01 km² of land per megawatt (MW), while wind farms require around 0.12 km² per MW, though only a small fraction of this land is actually impacted by turbines and infrastructure.Additionally, built-up land such as golf courses is often overlooked in renewable energy potential analyses, emphasizing the need to rethink land use priorities.

Dr. Jann Weinand, lead author of the study and Head of the Integrated Scenarios department at the Institute Jülich Systems Analysis at Forschungszentrum Jülich, says: “Our study does not advocate for the direct conversion of golf courses, but it highlights the vast potential for renewable energy on similarly large and underutilized areas. In light of the ongoing debates about land use for renewables, it is crucial to consider how we allocate land overall—especially when significant space is dedicated to activities that benefit only a limited segment of the population.” 

ENDS 

 

For more information contact: 

Faye Holst, communications manager at IOP Publishing

Faye.holst@ioppublishing.org

 

About IOP Publishing 
IOP Publishing is a society-owned scientific publisher, delivering impact, recognition and value to the scientific community. Its purpose is to expand the world of physics, offering a portfolio of journals, ebooks, conference proceedings and science news resources globally.   

IOPP is a member of Purpose-Led Publishing, a coalition of society publishers who pledge to put purpose above profit.  

As a wholly owned subsidiary of the Institute of Physics, a not-for-profit society, IOP Publishing supports the Institute’s work to inspire people to develop their knowledge, understanding and enjoyment of physics. Visit ioppublishing.org to learn more.