Sunday, July 20, 2025

Keir Starmer suspends Diane Abbott again over comments about racism

18 July, 2025 


‘It is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out.’

SHE SHOULD JOIN CROBYN'S NEW LEFT PARTY




Keir Starmer has suspended Diane Abbott, the longest-serving female MP, for a second time after she repeated comments about racism she was previously suspended for.

In a BBC Radio 4 interview with James Naughtie, which was recorded in May but released yesterday, she said: “Clearly there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism”.

She said that this is because you can’t immediately see if a person is a Traveller or is Jewish.

On the other hand, she said this isn’t the case for a black person. She stated: “If you see a black person walking down the street you see straight away that they’re black.”

In April 2023, Abbott made similar comments in a letter to the Observer, which ultimately wound up in her being suspended after Starmer called them “antisemitic”.

She then had the whip restored in May 2024, ahead of the general election.

In the letter, she said: “Irish, Jewish and Traveller people undoubtedly experience prejudice. This is similar to racism. It is true that many types of white people with points of difference, such as redheads, can experience this prejudice. But they are not all their lives subject to racism.”

Asked if she regretted the whole “hoo-ha” two years ago, she said “No, not at all”.

She defended her comments from 2023, saying “I just think that it’s silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.”

The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington said she condemns antisemitism, but gets “a bit weary” of being labelled antisemitic. She said she has spent her whole life fighting racism, particularly antisemitism, given the large Jewish population in her constituency.

Abbott will now sit as an Independent MP while the Labour Party carries out an investigation.

Responding to her suspension, Abbott said: “It is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out.

“My comments in the interview with James Naughtie were factually correct, as any fair-minded person would accept,” she said.

Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti said on the BBC: “People who are writing island of strangers speeches should be a bit slow to sit in judgement on Diane Abbott who has been fighting racism all her life.”

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward

Starmer slammed for Abbott re-suspension – Sam Browse


“People who are writing ‘island of strangers’ speeches should be a bit slow to sit in judgment on Diane Abbott, who has been fighting racism all her life.” – Shami Chakrabarti

Labour Outlook’s Sam Browse reports on the opposition to Diane Abbott’s suspension 

This week, Starmer has faced widespread opposition for the suspension of Diane Abbott after comments she made to BBC Radio 4. In clarifying remarks for which she was suspended in 2023-24, she set out her own experience of racism and differentiated between that which is directed at people of colour, and experienced by the Jewish and Traveller communities. You can listen to the full interview segment here. 

Since making the comments, the Labour Party has re-suspended Abbott as thousands have signed a renewed We stand with Diane Abbott petition  

Public figures from across the labour and trade union movement have strongly condemned the move, not least because the previous action against her was widely opposed as indicative of the different standard to which black women are held in Labour Party disciplinary procedures.

Speaking herself of the resuspension, Abbott said ‘it is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out’.

MPs took to social media to condemn the disciplinary action. John McDonnell said –

Bell Ribeiro-Addy emphasised her solidarity –

Apsana Begum highlighted Abbott’s importance in supporting colleagues on the Westminster benches –

And other MPs such as Richard Burgon and Ian Byrne restated their solidarity with Abbott and emphasised her importance in the struggle against racism –

Pointing to the hypocrisy of Abbott’s critics, the Labour peer, lawyer and human rights activist, Shami Chakrabarti, said that “people who are writing ‘island of strangers’ speeches should be a bit slow to sit in judgment on Diane Abbott, who has been fighting racism all her life.”

From outside the Labour benches, independent MPs such as Adnan Hussain were strident in their support –

Zarah Sultana similarly pointed to the hypocrisy and the findings of the Forde report, which found a hierarchy of racism in the Labour Party –

Beyond parliament, the campaign group, Stand Up to Racism, were similarly clear –

Lambeth councillor and activist, Martin Abrams – who has himself been blocked from restanding as a Labour candidate  for his support of the Palestinians – argued –

And even John McTernan, a former advisor to Blair, said –

Unusually, we agree with McTernan: hands off Diane Abbott; reinstate the whip now!




Right-Wing Watch

From Project 2025 to Project Esther: the Heritage Foundation’s authoritarian global crusade


Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

Project Esther is Heritage’s latest ideological weapon. Framed as an effort to combat antisemitism, it aims to criminalise pro-Palestinian activism and equates criticism of Israel with support for terrorism

.

For decades, the Heritage Foundation has been one of the most influential right-wing think-tanks in the United States, shaping Republican policy since the Reagan era. But its influence now stretches far beyond America’s borders. From gutting climate policy to criminalising dissent, Heritage’s authoritarian agenda is leaving its mark on UK politics, its fingerprints increasingly visible in policy debates and alliances across the British right.

With the return of a pliable and easily swayed Donald Trump, the Washington-based think-tank is poised to exert unprecedented influence. It must be rubbing its hands in glee and taking an early victory lap.

Its most radical initiatives, Project 2025, which outlines a sweeping plan to dismantle key institutions in a second Trump term, and Project Esther, which targets pro-Palestinian activism under the guise of combating antisemitism, are fast becoming cornerstones of a rising authoritarian agenda on both sides of the Atlantic.

Project 2025: rewriting the American state


First published in 2023, Project 2025: Mandate for Leadership – The Conservative Promise runs over 900 pages and proposes a total overhaul of the US federal government. It calls for slashing civil service jobs, gutting federal agencies, eliminating climate and LGBTQ+ policies, and erasing diversity and equity programmes from government.

The project is authored by Trump loyalists including Russ Vought, who was appointed as director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the Trump administration. Vought argues that federal bureaucracy is an existential threat to the country and that it should dramatically downsize.

Project 2025 has faced strong resistance from progressives and centrists alike, with even Trump publicly distancing himself from it. Yet despite the President claiming he had “nothing to do with it,” former Heritage official Paul Dans, who led the project until July 2024, stated that Trump’s return to power was “way beyond my wildest dreams.”

Indeed, several policies in Trump’s second-term agenda closely mirror Project 2025’s 900-page manifesto. One of them is the eliminating the Department of Education, something Trump has begun pursuing via executive order and staff cuts, though a full shutdown would require congressional approval. On his first day back in office, Trump signed an order ending all DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programmes in the federal government, corresponding with Project 2025’s call to dismantle DEI efforts across agencies.

But Project 2025 isn’t the only fascistic Heritage Foundation plan drawing attention. Several months into Trump’s second term, and the think-tank leaders are discussing another contentious policy paper.

Project Esther: silencing pro-Palestine dissent


Launched during the Biden era, Project Esther is Heritage’s latest ideological weapon. Framed as an effort to combat antisemitism, it aims to criminalise pro-Palestinian activism and equates criticism of Israel with support for terrorism. Created by the same minds that produced the Christian nationalist Project 2025, Project Esther has received support from some evangelical Christian organisations but not from major Jewish organisations. The name “Esther” is a reference to the Book of Esther, a biblical narrative about a Jewish queen who saves her people from persecution.

As Aljazeera reports, the Heritage Foundation has been open about its intention to transform “Project Esther” into government policy under a second Trump administration. Its strategy document was published on October 7, 2024, to mark the first anniversary of the Hamas attacks on Israel. It states that it hopes “Project Esther” would present “an opportunity for public-private partnership when a willing administration occupies the White House”



Numerous Black, Brown and Jewish elected representatives who voiced any criticism of Israel, including Senators Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer, are targeted and “collectively mischaracterised as members of “Hamas Support Organisations (HSO)”, part of a “Hamas Support Network,” notes Aljazeera.

The New York Times digs deep


In May, the New York Times published an in-depth investigation into Project Esther and its efforts to suppress pro-Palestinian activism in the US. The report revealed that in late April, the Heritage Foundation sent a delegation to Israel to meet with senior officials, including the country’s foreign and defence ministers, as well as US ambassador and Trump ally Mike Huckabee.

According to the NYT, Heritage’s Project Esther proposes a sweeping crackdown, including purging university curricula, defunding institutions, revoking student visas, and labelling critics of Israel as part of a “terrorist support network.” The goal, the report suggests, is to silence dissent and criminalise opposition to Israeli policy.

While Heritage frames Project Esther as a “groundbreaking” national strategy to combat antisemitism, claiming it targets only supporters of Hamas, critics argue it’s a thinly veiled attack on progressive activism more broadly, one that exploits genuine concerns about antisemitism to justify authoritarian measures.

“Project Esther exclusively focuses on antisemitism on the left, ignoring antisemitic harassment and violence from the right,” wrote investigative journalist Katie Baker, who authored the New York Times piece. “It has drawn criticism from many Jewish organisations amid increasing calls for them to push back against the Trump administration.”

Stefanie Fox, executive director of Jewish Voice for Peace, was even more direct:

“Trump is pulling straight from the authoritarian playbook, using tools of repression first against those organising for Palestinian rights. And in so doing, sharpening those tools for use against anyone and everyone who challenges his fascist agenda.”

And it’s hard to disagree. On the presidential campaign trail, Trump pledged to deport foreign nationals who support Palestinian resistance. Since returning to office, he has followed through by appointing hardline pro-Israel figures to key intelligence and national security roles. Among them is South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, who once introduced a bill cracking down on criticism of Israel on the grounds of “ensuring the security of God’s chosen people”, and was appointed as Trump’s secretary of homeland security.

And since Trump’s inauguration, Heritage’s proposals have begun to materialise with federal threats to university funding, crackdowns on campus protests, and legislative efforts to deport legal residents that echo Project Esther’s extreme recommendations.

Victoria Coates, former deputy national security adviser to Trump and the vice president at Heritage who oversees Project Esther, confirmed the plan is already underway: “The phase we’re in now is starting to execute some of the lines of effort in terms of legislative, legal and financial penalties for what we consider to be material support for terrorism.”

The pressing question is how much of these contentious, authoritarian plans will influence politics closer to home, in the UK and across Europe?



The Transatlantic expansion

Authoritarianism is gaining ground in Europe under the guise of cracking down on pro-Palestinian activism. From the Netherlands, where political leaders sided with Israeli football fans who rampaged through Amsterdam last November, to Germany, where pro-Palestinian groups have long faced state repression, the signs are growing. Aljazeera reports that since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, activists in Germany have faced surveillance, police violence, frozen bank accounts, and sweeping bans on demonstrations and events. Groups like Samidoun, a pro-Palestinian advocacy group based in Canada, known for organising solidarity protests and events, particularly in support of Palestinian prisoners, have been outlawed outright.

Palestine Action


Even in the UK, similar authoritarian measures are beginning to take hold. In early July, MPs voted overwhelmingly to designate Palestine Action a terrorist organisation under anti-terrorism laws, placing it in the same legal category as al-Qaeda and ISIS.

Home secretary Yvette Cooper introduced the order just days after Palestine Action activists broke into RAF Brize Norton, Britain’s largest airbase, and sprayed two military aircraft with red paint, causing what police described as millions of pounds in damage .

Palestine Action describes itself as a direct-action group targeting the arms industry in the UK. It says it is “committed to ending global participation in Israel’s genocidal and apartheid regime.” Yet the government claims it is a “terrorist” outfit.

Manaal Siddiqui, a spokesperson for the group, said it was unprecedented for Palestine Action to be proscribed as a terrorist organisation.

“The majority of the proscribed groups are international. The majority of them take actions in very, very different ways. Palestine Action would be a complete outlier. It’s a draconian approach for the government to stifle protests that they just don’t like. It’s genuinely terrifying for anyone who cares about civil liberties in the UK.”



Project 2025 comes to Europe

Similarly, the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 agenda is no longer confined to American politics, it’s going global. In June, Heritage president Kevin Roberts travelled to France to meet with far-right leaders, signalling that Project 2025 is not just a domestic policy roadmap, but part of a broader international crusade.

The French newspaper Le Monde described Roberts as one of the most “zealous ideologues” of Trump’s second presidency, known for his radical metaphors about “burning it all down” to rebuild America in a nationalist, reactionary image. A Louisiana native and historian by training, Roberts has led the think-tank since 2021, earning nearly $1 million annually. A regular at Mar-a-Lago, he has formed a close relationship with Vice President JD Vance, the nationalist Catholic revered by far-right movements on both sides of the Atlantic.

In Europe, the ideological export of Heritage-style conservatism is already taking root. Across recent elections, discreet yet growing networks have worked to support far-right parties, with playbooks strikingly similar to that of Project 2025. These ultra-conservative forces seek to dismantle progressive policies and replace them with ultra traditionalist and fundamentalist Christian values of a particular kind, leaving little space for feminists, LGBTQ+ advocates, and other marginalised groups.

Surge in attacks against LGBTQ+ community


And minority groups are indeed already very much being targeted.

In February, ILGA-Europe, a leading LGBTQ+ rights organisation, issued a stark warning: LGBTQ+ identities are being “weaponised to erode the foundations of freedom and democracy across Europe.”

Polish sociologist Elżbieta Korolczuk, associate professor at Södertörn University in Sweden, sees a pattern. “They [the ultraconservatives] are also producing knowledge. They publish papers, they publish amicus briefs for court proceedings and so on. And they share those,” she told France24.

She argues that the targeting of LGBTQ+ communities is deliberate. “Because they are a minority. They are going after the weakest. That’s very clear.”

Korolczuk has no doubt that many European ultraconservative groups are cooperating with like-minded peers in the US, like the Heritage Foundation. “I think Project 2025 will be used as a blueprint in some European elections as well,” she said.

What about Britain?

As we know, the Heritage Foundation has long-standing ties to the British right, including some of the most prominent figures in the Conservative Party.

Robert Jenrick, Priti Patel, and Oliver Dowden are among several senior Tories who have close connections with the US think-tank. Since the release of Project 2025 in April 2023, a number of high-profile Conservative politicians, including Lord David Frost and former prime minister Liz Truss, have delivered speeches at Heritage Foundation events, allying themselves with its hard-right agenda.

The Heritage Foundation is also a member of the Atlas Network, a global alliance of right-wing think-tanks that share close ties with UK-based groups clustered around 55 Tufton Street, the Westminster address synonymous with Britain’s libertarian-conservative lobby. Figures like Truss, Jenrick, Patel, Matt Goodwin, and Nigel Farage have all contributed to Heritage events.

In fact, Nigel Farage has used his first year in Parliament not to represent his Clacton constituents, whom he has mentioned just four times in the Commons, but to promote his affiliation with the US radical right. According to reports by DeSmog and the Mirror this week, Farage has made multiple trips to the US to deliver speeches to hard-right groups linked to Donald Trump, often using the platform to push his anti-climate agenda, while making nearly £1 million on top of his MP’s salary.



The Heritage Foundation is no longer just a hard-right Washington think-tank, it’s a global force in the rising tide of reactionary politics. With Project 2025 and Project Esther, Heritage is advancing a vision that seeks not only to reshape America, but to realign the world order along authoritarian, Christian nationalist lines. As these policies begin to take hold in Europe, the question is no longer whether the far right is gaining momentum, but how far it will go.



Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is author of Right-Wing Watch



UK 

Nurses’ pay has been ‘severely eroded’ since 2010, new analysis shows
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward


“It is time to deliver both better pay and pay modernisation for nursing staff.”



Nurses in England are earning up to £8,000 less than they would have if pay had kept pace with inflation, according to new analysis by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN). The report confirms there’s been a 20 percent real-terms pay cut for Band 5 nurses, typically newly qualified staff, whose earnings have stagnated since 2010, despite growing workloads and responsibilities.

These nurses, often stuck on the same band for their entire careers, have faced a series of below-inflation pay rises, leading to a cumulative loss of £70,000 over 15 years until 2025. The RCN warns that “collapsing” wages are driving a workforce crisis, undermining patient care and threatening the success of the NHS’s 10-Year Health Plan.

That plan, entitled “Fit for the Future,” promises a shift from hospital to community care, from analogue to digital, and from sickness to prevention. But according to Patricia Marquis, executive director of RCN England, those goals are incompatible with a demoralised, underpaid workforce:

Nursing staff are “tired of playing constant financial catch-up, often struggling to pay rent or get on the housing ladder,” said Marquis.

“Attracting and keeping talented people should be the government’s priority, but that requires them to do better on nursing pay,” she added.

Tens of thousands of nurses are now voting in the RCN’s pay award consultation

“Our members are voting in their tens of thousands and making their voices heard on this pay award. Ministers must realise that the only sensible choice left to them is to negotiate directly with the largest health care workforce,” Marquis continued.

“It is time to deliver both better pay and pay modernisation for nursing staff.”

The research follows the British Medical Association’s (BMA) announcement that resident doctors, previously known as junior doctors, in England will strike for five consecutive days on July 25 due to an ongoing pay dispute with the government.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting insists there will be no further movement on pay but says he is willing to meet with unions to discuss working conditions. The RCN is calling on the government to “deliver both better pay and pay modernisation” and to negotiate directly with what remains the largest workforce in the NHS.
Most Brits support a wealth tax – so, which European countries have one?


Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead
Today
Left Foot Forward

Britain is one of the most unequal countries in the OECD. The richest 10 percent of households hold 43 percent of all the country’s wealth, while the poorest half own just 9 percent.



A new survey shows Brits overwhelmingly support a wealth tax on the ultra-rich. According to recently-released YouGov polling, two-thirds of UK voters support a 2 percent tax on individuals with wealth over £10 million. Experts estimate such a levy could generate around £11 billion annually.

Support for the policy spans the political spectrum. 88 percent of Labour voters are in favour, alongside 83 percent of Liberal Democrats, 61 percent of Conservatives, and even 55 percent of Reform supporters.

The polling comes amid growing speculation that Labour may consider implementing a wealth tax, despite previous assurances from the Chancellor that the party had no such plans.

The current tax system favours the wealthy by taxing income from assets, such as dividends and capital gains, at much lower rates than income from work.

Britain is one of the most unequal countries in the OECD. The richest 10 percent of households hold 43 percent of all the country’s wealth, while the poorest half own just 9 percent. As of 2023, the combined wealth of the UK’s 50 richest families surpassed that of 34.1 million people, more than half the population.

Proponents argue that a wealth tax could help redress these imbalances. Jake Atkinson of Tax Justice UK, a campaign group advocating for fairer taxation, said:

“Inequality has skyrocketed. We have millions on NHS waiting lists, queues for food banks, millions of children in poverty, and then at the very same time, there are very, very rich people who have massive, massive amounts of wealth, which is currently under taxed. It’s an open goal for the government.”

Critics, however, warn that a wealth tax could damage investor confidence and drive high-net-worth individuals to relocate to avoid higher taxes.

Which European countries have a wealth tax?

At present, only three European countries impose a net wealth tax, Norway, Switzerland, and Spain. France and Italy tax specific types of assets but not on an individual’s net wealth

Spain levies a progressive net wealth tax ranging from 0.16 percent to 3.5 percent on wealth above €700,000, although rates vary significantly by region. Some areas, including Madrid and Andalusia, offer a 100 percent exemption. In addition, a temporary “solidarity wealth tax” was introduced in 2022 and 2023 for individuals with net assets over €3 million. This tax ranges from 1.7 percent to 3.5 percent and is collected by the central government.

Switzerland applies its wealth tax at the cantonal level, with tax rates and exemptions varying across the country. It covers global assets, excluding real estate and permanent establishments located abroad, and has been in place since 1840.

Norway levies a net wealth tax of 1 percent on individuals’ wealth stocks exceeding €150,000, with 0.7 percent going to municipalities and 0.3 percent to the central government. Norway’s net wealth tax dates to 1892. Additionally, for net wealth exceeding $1.94 million, the tax rate is 1.1 percent.

Speaking in Parliament this week, Labour MP Richard Burgon, who has long called for a wealth tax, said it was great to see support for the proposal “growing stronger by the day.”

“The government should grasp the nettle,” said Burgon, “and introduce a series of wealth taxes, starting with a 2% tax on wealth above £10 million. That would raise billions more for our public services.”



Right-wing media watch – Daily Mail is America’s top news brand on TikTok – yes really!


Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead 
Left Foot Forward


The Daily Mail, Britain’s most notorious right-wing newspaper, is now the most-engaged news brand on TikTok in America.



Every now and then, a news item forces a double take, and this one certainly qualifies. The Daily Mail, Britain’s most notorious right-wing newspaper, is now the most-engaged news brand on TikTok in America.

According to Chaotic Era, an independent newsletter covering politics and media in the digital age written by Kyle Tharp, the 120-year-old publication has cracked the code for Gen Z engagement. The Mail’s main TikTok account now boasts over 23.2 million followers, gaining more than 10 million in the past nine months alone, with its posts racking up more than 2.9 billion likes and over a billion engagements last year. Its gravitational pull on the platform is so strong that one analyst likened it to “a neutron star” in the TikTok news universe.

Who would have thought that the newspaper beloved by delusional right-wing Boomers, the ones cheerfully voting for policies that undermine their own grandchildren’s future, would somehow reinvent itself as a viral hit among Gen Z?

On the surface, it looks like a savvy digital transformation. Nathan Giannini, the Mail’s deputy head of social video, explains: “[Tiktok] offers incredible reach with an audience that likely doesn’t already engage with the Daily Mail on a regular basis. TikTok has been around for almost a decade, so even if someone signed up in high school, now they could be in their late 20s. That informs some of our coverage decisions. It’s not all viral dances and trending audios — we treat our audience like grownups, because they are. That means covering things grownups care about: the US presidential election, war in the Middle East, as well as some lighter fare.”

It’s certainly a curious ideological mismatch. TikTok’s user base is typically young, diverse, and politically progressive, a demographic seemingly at odds with the Mail’s editorial stance. But by leaning into fast-paced, visually polished content and downplaying its more overt political leanings, the news brand has managed to appear fresh, relevant, and even, dare we say it, apolitical.

But scratch the surface and the cynicism becomes hard to ignore. The Mail’s TikTok success may be platform-optimised and algorithmically slick, but its core identity remains unchanged, rooted in sensationalism, fearmongering, and a reactionary worldview that has long polluted British public discourse.

Giannini even admits much of the content is still “bread and butter Daily Mail.”

And, a quick look at its TikTok account in the UK, and who pops up on one of the first posts? Good old Boris Johnson, beloved by the Mail and many a right-wing Boomer.

“Who benefits from the tide of migrants crossing the Channel every day? There is one ultimate beneficiary of this whole nightmare, Boris Johnson says and that is Emmanuel Macron of France. Read his column on the French president’s ‘continuing jihad against Brexit’ at DailyMail.co.uk,” read the post alongside a video of Boris himself, which has over 2100 likes.

And therein lies the danger: behind the slick video production and “grown-up” tone lies the same relentless, sensationalist machinery that’s defined the Mail for decades.

Elsewhere in the UK media, some attempt at balance exists. The Mail’s parent company has invested in more centrist or non-partisan brands like Metro and The I, perhaps in an effort to hedge against the increasing scrutiny of its flagship brand?

Who knows. But one thing’s clear: you can rebrand the wrapper, tweak the tone, and chase the algorithm, but underneath it all, the Daily Mail is still the Daily Mail.

 

Idaho National Laboratory to lead advancements in US semiconductor manufacturing





DOE/Idaho National Laboratory

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been chosen to serve as the chief digital officer for the Semiconductor Manufacturing and Advanced Research with Twins USA Institute (SMART USA) 

image: 

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been chosen to serve as the chief digital officer for the Semiconductor Manufacturing and Advanced Research with Twins USA Institute (SMART USA)

view more 

Credit: Idaho National Laboratory





(IDAHO FALLS, Idaho) – The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been chosen to serve as the chief digital officer for the Semiconductor Manufacturing and Advanced Research with Twins USA Institute (SMART USA). This Manufacturing USA Institute, funded by the National Institute for Standards and Technology CHIPS for America program and launched in 2025, is led by Semiconductor Research Corporation Manufacturing Consortium Corporation.

The SMART USA program is partnering with the Department of Energy to tackle the semiconductor industry’s toughest challenges, leveraging the department’s decades-long investments in high-performance computing. This initiative will advance American digital twin technology, build a digital backbone, and apply it to the semiconductor supply chain to reboot domestic manufacturing competitiveness and ensure economic and national security.

“INL was selected for its vast expertise in digital twinning, high-performance computing, digital engineering, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing,” said Chris Ritter, INL’s Division Director of Scientific Computing and AI, who will lead INL’s part of the effort. “We will also be in charge of developing tools and methodologies to provide agile responses to supply chain disruptions, ensuring continuous and efficient semiconductor production.”

As the electronics industry grows, efficient and secure semiconductor manufacturing will become more vital. SMART USA and INL will employ digital twin technology to reduce the significant time and costs associated with chip design and production.

A digital twin is like a virtual copy of something real, such as a machine, building or even a whole system. This virtual version is constantly updated with data from the real thing, allowing it to predict what might happen and help make better decisions. Essentially, it’s a high-tech way to monitor and improve real-world objects and systems.

With years of experience in developing digital twin technology, INL is positioned to lead this initiative. INL computer scientists have created digital twin initiatives across key focus areas: nuclear operations, energy systems, advanced materials, fuel cycles and cyber-physical security. These include the AGN-201 digital twin, the first digital twin of an operating nuclear reactor. INL developed the AGN-201 twin in partnership with Idaho State University, where the physical reactor is located. The twin receives live data and allows the digital users to detect when nuclear reactor operators make changes or adjustments to the real-world 5-watt reactor.

Additionally, INL will lead the Rocky Mountain region’s Digital Innovation Semiconductor Centers. In this role, the lab will work with Boise State University, the College of Eastern Idaho, the University of Utah, other regional universities, Mountain West-based semiconductor companies like Micron and Texas Instruments, and nearby national laboratories such as the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to build a highly-skilled semiconductor workforce across the region.

“We are thrilled to embark on this exciting partnership with Idaho National Lab. Collaborating with Chris Ritter and the team at INL opens up incredible opportunities for innovation and advancement in our field,” said Todd Younkin, executive director for the SMART USA Institute and president and CEO of Semiconductor Research Corporation. “INL’s pioneering work in digital twins, which integrate physical assets with computational capabilities, is set to revolutionize semiconductor manufacturing.”

A crucial part of this new project’s scope is to bolster domestic manufacturing competitiveness to secure economic and national security interests, with the overarching goal of returning semiconductor manufacturing to American soil. INL’s leadership ensures that the Mountain West Region will be at the forefront of these new technological innovations and the growing workforce and opportunities the semiconductor industry will bring.

About SMART USA

SMART USA (Semiconductor Manufacturing for Advanced Research with Twins),a Manufacturing USA® institute, advances America’s semiconductor manufacturing through digital twin technology. Founded in 2025 by the Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC), SMART USA operates as a separate non-profit member collaborative. Learn more at www.smartusatwins.org. Follow us on LinkedIn.

About Idaho National Laboratory

Battelle Energy Alliance manages INL for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy. INL is the nation’s center for nuclear energy research and development, and also performs research in each of DOE’s strategic goal areas: energy, national security, science and the environment. For more information, visit www.inl.gov.


 

AI-assisted sorting, other new technologies could improve plastic recycling



Review article analyzes the latest methods in plastic recycling guided by process systems engineering approaches




University at Buffalo




BUFFALO, N.Y. — Just 9% of plastic worldwide is recycled. Due to waste mismanagement, nearly three-quarters of it ends up in landfills or the environment. 

So how can plastic recycling be more efficient?

A review article by University at Buffalo researchers summarizes the latest technologies and methods guided by process systems engineering approaches, from chemical solvents that can dissolve specific plastics to automated plastic sorting aided by artificial intelligence.

Selected as the cover article for the July 9 issue of Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, a journal of the American Chemical Society (ACS), the article concludes that solvent-based recycling is both a sustainable and economical option, but that replacing fossil-based plastics with biobased plastics remains a challenge.

“More research and technology development are necessary to attain sustainability in plastics management,” says the study’s corresponding author, Aurora del Carmen Munguía-López, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, within the UB School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. “We not only need holistic and comprehensive approaches, but to consider the pros and cons of those approaches throughout their entire life cycle.” 

The article’s co-authors are postdoctoral researcher Xate Sanchez-Zarco and PhD student Alan Owusu-Boateng.

Plastics still irreplaceable

Improper disposal of plastics can cause plastic waste to accumulate in both the environment — it’s estimated there’s 150 million tons of it in the ocean — and the human body. Exposure to plastics has been linked to cancer, respiratory problems, fertility issues and developmental delays.

However, plastics are also a crucial part of modern life, being used in packaging, electronics, buildings and textiles. They have plenty of environmental benefits, too, from reducing food waste to increasing the fuel efficiency of vehicles. 

“Eliminating the use of plastics is not currently a viable option,” Munguía-López says.

“We need alternatives to the current unsustainable management of plastics.”

Solvents, AI could offer recycling solutions

One of the alternatives may be solvent-based recycling, which can recycle complex materials that cannot be recycled by traditional means. Solvents can dissolve high-purity polymers within a plastic waste stream, thereby removing them from unwanted contaminants. 

The article highlights a recent University of Wisconsin-Madison-led study, co-authored by Munguía-López, that found that solvent-based recycling was the most economical option for recycling complex, multilayer plastic film used in coffee grounds packaging.

While solvent-based recycling has relatively low greenhouse gas emissions, variations in the process can significantly increase emissions. Solvent-based recycling should use a cooling method to reform the dissolved polymers from the solution, various studies have shown, as opposed to a heating method that generates more emissions.

“Either way, solvent-based recycling does produce higher emissions than traditional recycling, so the best approach is likely combining both solvent-based and traditional recycling," Munguía-López says.

The article also summarized research about the role of AI and machine learning in plastics management. One sorting model developed by University of Wisconsin-Madison researchers called PlasticNet achieved a classification accuracy of over 87% and even 100% on some specific plastics. Other teams have used AI to better study recycling technologies, developing natural language processing models to extract relevant data from the literature.

“AI models will also be needed to address demands at the supply chain level, like improving transportation planning, coordinating stakeholders, and evaluating different policy scenarios,” Munguía-López says.

Can we switch to biobased plastics?

The feasibility of biobased plastics, which are made from agricultural crops like sugar cane and corn and could be disposed of through composting, is less clear. 

While biobased plastics have lower emissions, they also require lots of water and land and directly compete with the food supply. Implementing biobased plastics would also require more composting facilities and equipping the public with ways to separate them from traditional plastics.

“We can’t validate biobased plastics until we consider the impact of their entire life cycle, from raw materials extraction and production to disposal and sorting,” Munguía-López says. “Future work in plastics management should include systems-level analyses to address this multiscale and multidimension problem.”