Tuesday, September 15, 2026

SPACE/COSMOS

Venus ate its moon


Study explains why Earth’s ‘twin’ lacks rocky satellite



University of California - Riverside

Venus

image: 

Image of Earth's fiery twin, Venus.

view more 

Credit: NASA/JPL/Caltech





Scientists have long speculated why Venus, with a similar size, mass, and structure to Earth, doesn’t have a moon. New UC Riverside research shows it’s because our hungry twin likely swallowed it.

In the past, scientists have theorized that Venus possibly had a moon at one time that got hit with something massive, obliterating it. Other theories centered around the idea that Venus never underwent a collision that formed a moon in the first place.

The new research, published in The Astrophysical Journal, shows that neither theory fits. “My study shows Venus didn’t require a catastrophe to arrive at what we can see today,” said UCR astrophysicist and lead author Stephen Kane. “It turns out the gravity of the planet itself combined with the rate at which it spins naturally caused the moon to collapse on top of it.”

Scientists can precisely measure the distance between Earth and the moon because NASA’s Apollo 11 landing left mirrors there. “We know that the moon is slowly moving away from the planet, at a rate of around four centimeters per year,” Kane said. This distancing, Kane said, is happening because Earth spins at a relatively fast 24 hours per rotation. The energy from this spinning gets transferred to the moon, causing it to distance itself.

Venus has the exact opposite situation. It takes that planet 243 Earth days to complete a single rotation. So, rather than gradually moving away, the slow spin and the planet’s gravity would cause a moon to spiral inward toward a collision.

To test this idea, Kane wrote computer models based on the physics of how planetary bodies interact through gravity. He first reproduced the evolution of Earth and its moon to make sure the model accurately represented a known system.

Then he varied Venus’ rotation rate and the size of its hypothetical moons, testing moons with masses ranging from half to ten times the mass of Earth’s moon. In most simulations, the result was the same: the moon crashed into Venus. And the more massive the moon, the faster it crashed.

“When I made this discovery, I was shocked,” Kane said. “I thought surely the broad range of scenarios I was exploring would lead to a variety of results. But it all went pretty much in the same direction.”

The finding does not prove that Venus once had a moon. Kane believes it may have, but whether one ever formed remains an open question. The study does show that if Venus had a moon, it could not have continued existing indefinitely.

Finding physical evidence of such a collision would be difficult. Roughly 80% of Venus’ surface is similar in age, evidence of a major resurfacing event about a billion years ago that erased much of the planet’s earlier geological history.

Evidence could instead lie beneath the surface. Scientists believe Earth’s moon formed after a massive collision early in the planet’s history, and seismic studies have revealed unusual structures deep inside Earth that may be remnants of that event. Similar measurements on Venus could offer clues about whether it once absorbed a moon.

Such a collision could also help scientists understand another longstanding mystery about Venus: whether Earth’s nearest planetary neighbor was ever capable of hosting life.

A moon crashing into Venus would have transferred enormous energy and angular momentum to the planet, potentially changing its rotation, geology, and climate. If Venus once had oceans or other conditions favorable to life, such an impact could have altered the course of the planet’s evolution.

The implications extend beyond Venus. Scientists searching for potentially habitable worlds around other stars often look for planets resembling Earth and consider the presence of a moon one factor that could influence habitability.

Earth’s moon drives tides, may have helped keep the planet geologically active, and has profoundly influenced Earth’s evolution. Scientists do not know, however, whether a large moon is necessary for life.

“My feeling is there are benefits to having a moon, but it isn’t required for habitability,” Kane said. “The moon has definitely changed the way Earth has evolved through time, but we don’t fully know how important that role is.”

Kane’s findings suggest that even planets capable of forming moons may not be able to keep them. Slowly rotating worlds could send their moons spiraling toward their surfaces, dramatically changing the planets in the process.

“When people think about Earth twins around other stars, one question they ask is, ‘Does it have a moon?’” Kane said. “My study shows a disturbing scenario for many of those cases. If these planets don’t rotate fast enough, the moon will crash to the surface, and that would change the course of history for those planets.”

How black holes can build up stars and galaxies, instead of thwarting them



Observations show active supermassive black holes influence star formation and shock waves across their host galaxies




Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian

Galaxy NGC 1386

image: 

 Image of galaxy NGC 1386, taken with Legacy Surveys DR10

view more 

Credit: Legacy Surveys DR10




Cambridge, MA (September 14, 2026) —A new study of nine nearby galaxies has shown that actively growing supermassive black holes may contribute to star formation, instead preventing star formation, in their host galaxies. 

The research, based on observations from the VLT/MUSE instrument, shows that active galactic nuclei (AGN), or bright regions powered by material falling into a supermassive black hole, are associated with star-forming rings or arcs, cone-shaped regions of energized gas, and fast “shocks,” which occur when energy outflows interact with surrounding gas.

The findings give a new perspective on how AGN feedback could influence the growth and evolution of galaxies. 

“Once we resolved them, we could see that they not only accrete things, but they also eject things,” said Peixin Zhu, graduate student and astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics. “The injection and accretion are linked with each other.”

The study focused on galaxies whose central black holes are actively accreting, or pulling in, nearby material. 

“We’re seeing that black holes are not just consuming material at the centers of galaxies, but they’re actively reshaping their surroundings,” said Lisa Kewley, an astrophysicist at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, director of the Center, and Zhu’s advisor. “This work helps us understand a complex feedback cycle that plays an important role in galaxy evolution.”

The team used a new three-dimensional diagnostic technique to distinguish among three sources: star formation, radiation from the active black hole and excitation by shocks. Shock excitation occurs when high-speed outflows from the central black hole collide with the interstellar medium.

 

The galaxy NGC1386, shown in grayscale on the left and zoomed in to the central region on the right. The colors represent star formation in red, black-hole radiation in blue, and shocks in yellow. Image courtesy Peixin Zhu. 

Across the sample, the researchers found that star-forming rings or arcs appeared at distances of about 0.8 to 6 kiloparsecs from the galactic center. Ionized cones of black-hole radiation extended outward from the galaxies’ discs, while central regions dominated by fast shocks often extended perpendicular to those bicones. 

The researchers also found evidence for shocks in directions perpendicular to the AGN bicones. Zhu notes that these shocks are broadly consistent with interactions between AGN jets and the interstellar medium, although winds from the active black hole may also contribute, particularly in galaxies with lower-power jets.

“The most interesting phenomena about shocks is that they always go perpendicular to where the black hole’s injected outflows go,” Peixin said. “It is very common, and we see it consistently appearing across the whole nine galaxies.”

The study’s results combined high-resolution observations and detailed theoretical models. The MUSE instrument provided spatially-resolved optical data, while the state-of-the-art theoretical models built by Zhu and her colleagues, astrophysicists Lisa Kewley of the Center for Astrophysics and Ralph Sutherland of the Australian National University, allowed them to compare observations with predictions for black hole activity, star formation and shocks. Chandra X-ray observations also independently supported the researchers’ interpretation.

The results demonstrate that actively growing black holes have a complex cycle of accretion, outflow and interaction with their surrounding galaxies. By separating the effects of black hole radiation, star formation and shocks, the study provides a clearer view of that cycle and its relationship to star formation.

About the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian

The Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian is a collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory designed to ask, and ultimately answer,  humanity’s greatest unresolved questions about the universe. 


The galaxy NGC1386, shown in grayscale on the left and zoomed in to the central region on the right. The colors represent star formation in red, black-hole radiation in blue, and shocks in yellow. Image courtesy Peixin Zhu. 

Credit

Created by Peixin Zhu

No comments: