Showing posts sorted by relevance for query HAGFISH. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query HAGFISH. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

THE HAGFISH

Researchers sequence the first genome of myxini, the only vertebrate lineage that had no reference genome


Such finding, published in ‘Nature Ecology & Evolution’, is the work of an international consortium of more than 30 institutions from 7 countries around the world


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF MALAGA

Researchers sequence the first genome of myxini, the only vertebrate lineage that had no reference genome 

VIDEO: 

AN INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC TEAM MADE UP OF MORE THAN 40 AUTHORS FROM SEVEN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, LED BY THE RESEARCHER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MALAGA JUAN PASCUAL ANAYA, HAS MANAGED TO SEQUENCE THE FIRST GENOME OF THE MYXINI –ALSO KNOWN AS ‘HAGFISH’–, THE ONLY LARGE GROUP OF VERTEBRATES FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO REFERENCE GENOME OF ANY OF ITS SPECIES YET.

view more 

CREDIT: UNIVERSITY OF MALAGA




An international scientific team made up of more than 40 authors from seven different countries, led by the researcher at the University of Malaga Juan Pascual Anaya, has managed to sequence the first genome of the myxini –also known as ‘hagfish’–, the only large group of vertebrates for which there was no reference genome of any of its species yet.

This finding, published in the scientific journal ‘Nature Ecology & Evolution’, has allowed deciphering the evolutionary history of genome duplications –number of times a genome is completely duplicated– that occurred in the ancestors of vertebrates, a group that comprises the human beings.

“This study has important implications in the evolutionary and molecular field, as it helps us understand the changes in the genome that accompanied the origin of vertebrates and their most unique structures, such as the complex brain, the jaw and the limbs”, explains the scientist of the Department of Animal Biology of the UMA Pascual Anaya, who has coordinated the research.

Thus, this study, which has taken almost a decade, has been carried out by an international consortium that includes more than 30 institutions from Spain, United Kingdom, Japan, China, Italy, Norway and the United States, including the University of Tokyo, the Japan research institute RIKEN, the Chinese Academy of Science and the Centre for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona, among others.

Ecological link

The myxini or ‘hagfish’ are a group of animals that inhabit deep ocean areas. Known for the amount of mucosa they release when they feel threatened –a focus of research of cosmetic companies– and, also, for their role as an ecological link in the seabed –since they are scavengers and are responsible for eliminating, among other things, the corpses of whales that end up at the bottom of the sea after dying–; hitherto their genome had not been sequenced due to its complexity, since they are composed of a large number of microchromosomes, which, in turn, are composed of repetitive sequences. This is in addition to the difficulty of accessing biological material.

“Besides, these microchromosomes are lost during the development of the animal, so that only the genital organs maintain a whole genome,” says Juan Pascual Anaya.

Genome duplications

To be more specific, for this study, in collaboration with the Chinese Academy of Science, the genome that has been sequenced is that of the Eptatretus burgeri, which lives in the Pacific, on the coasts of East Asia. To achieve this, the researchers generated data up to 400 times the size of its genome, using advanced techniques –Hi-C– of chromosomal proximity and managing to assemble it at chromosome level.

“This is important because it allowed us to compare, for example, the order of genes between this and the rest of vertebrates, including sharks and humans, and, thus, solve one of the most important open debates in genomic evolution: the number of genome duplications, and when these occurred during the origin of the different vertebrate lineages,” says the UMA scientist, who adds that thanks to this we now know that the common ancestor of all vertebrates derived from a species which genome was completely duplicated once.

Later, according to Pascual Anaya, the lineages that gave rise to modern mandibular and non-mandibular vertebrates separated, and each of these re-multiplied its genome independently: while the former, which include humans, duplicated it, the latter tripled it.

Evolutionary impact

An analysis of the functionality of genomes, based on extremely rare samples of myxini embryos, carried out in the prestigious laboratory of Professor Shigeru Kuratani of RIKEN; and a study on the possible impact of genome duplications on each vertebrate, developed together with the Professor at the University of Bristol and member of the Royal Society Phil Donoghue, complete this multidisciplinary research that is key to understanding the evolutionary history of vertebrates, since it provides perspectives on the genomic events that, probably, drove the appearance of important characteristics of vertebrates, such as brain structure, sensory organs or neural crest cells, among them, an increase in regulatory complexity, that is, a greater number of switches that turn genes on/off.

Juan Pascual Anaya is a scientist of the Department of Animal Biology of the University of Malaga. He studies the evolution of innovative structures that appear in different animal lineages, mainly vertebrates, for example, blood cells and the process by which they are produced, as well as other structures such as the origin of legs, hands or jaws.

He holds a degree in Biology from the University of Malaga and a PhD in Genetics from the University of Barcelona (2010). He held a postdoctoral position for 5 years, until 2015, at the RIKEN center in Japan, in the laboratory of Professor Shigeru Kuratani, where he became independent as a Permanent Scientific Researcher until 2021, year in which he returned to the UMA as a senior researcher of the ‘Beatriz Galindo’ grant program.

To be more specific, for this study, in collaboration with the Chinese Academy of Science, the genome that has been sequenced is that of the Eptatretus burgeri, which lives in the Pacific, on the coasts of East Asia. To achieve this, the researchers generated data up to 400 times the size of its genome, using advanced techniques –Hi-C– of chromosomal proximity and managing to assemble it at chromosome level.


An international scientific team made up of more than 40 authors from seven different countries, led by the researcher at the University of Malaga Juan Pascual Anaya, has managed to sequence the first genome of the myxini –also known as ‘hagfish’–, the only large group of vertebrates for which there was no reference genome of any of its species yet.

An international scientific team made up of more than 40 authors from seven different countries, led by the researcher at the University of Malaga Juan Pascual Anaya, has managed to sequence the first genome of the myxini –also known as ‘hagfish’–, the only large group of vertebrates for which there was no reference genome of any of its species yet.

CREDIT

University of Malaga








No One Is Prepared for Hagfish Slime

It expands by 10,000 times in a fraction of a second, it’s 100,000 times softer than Jell-O, and it fends off sharks and Priuses alike.
A car is covered in hagfish, and slime, after an accident on Highway 101. (Reuters)

ATLANTIC
JANUARY 23, 2019

At first glance, the hagfish—a sinuous, tubular animal with pink-grey skin and a paddle-shaped tail—looks very much like an eel. Naturalists can tell the two apart because hagfish, unlike other fish, lack backbones (and, also, jaws). For everyone else, there’s an even easier method. “Look at the hand holding the fish,” the marine biologist Andrew Thaler once noted. “Is it completely covered in slime? Then, it’s a hagfish.”

Hagfish produce slime the way humans produce opinions—readily, swiftly, defensively, and prodigiously. They slime when attacked or simply when stressed. On July 14, 2017, a truck full of hagfish overturned on an Oregon highway. The animals were destined for South Korea, where they are eaten as a delicacy, but instead, they were strewn across a stretch of Highway 101, covering the road (and at least one unfortunate car) in slime.

Typically, a hagfish will release less than a teaspoon of gunk from the 100 or so slime glands that line its flanks. And in less than half a second, that little amount will expand by 10,000 times—enough to fill a sizable bucket. Reach in, and every move of your hand will drag the water with it. “It doesn’t feel like much at first, as if a spider has built a web underwater,” says Douglas Fudge of Chapman University. But try to lift your hand out, and it’s as if the bucket’s contents are now attached to you.

The slime looks revolting, but it’s also one of nature’s more wondrous substances, unlike anything else that’s been concocted by either evolution or engineers. Fudge, who has been studying its properties for two decades, says that when people first touch it, they are invariably surprised. “It looks like a bunch of mucus that someone just sneezed out of their nose,” he says. “That’s not at all what it’s like.”

For a start, it’s not sticky. If there wasn’t so damn much of it, you’d be able to wipe it off your skin with ease. The hagfish themselves scrape the slime off their skin by tying a knot in their bodies and sliding it from head to tail.

The slime also “has a very strange sensation of not quite being there,” says Fudge. It consists of two main components—mucus and protein threads. The threads spread out and entangle one another, creating a fast-expanding net that traps both mucus and water. Astonishingly, to create a liter of slime, a hagfish has to release only 40 milligrams of mucus and protein—1,000 times less dry material than human saliva contains. That’s why the slime, though strong and elastic enough to coat a hand, feels so incorporeal.

Indeed, it’s one of the softest materials ever measured. “Jell-O is between 10,000 and 100,000 times stiffer than hagfish slime,” says Randy Ewoldt from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who had to invent new methods for assessing the substance’s properties after conventional instruments failed to cope with its nature. “When you see it in a bucket, it almost still looks like water. Only when you stick your hand in and pick it up do you find that it’s a coherent thing.”

The proteins threads that give the slime cohesion are incredible in their own right. Each is one-100th the width of a human hair, but can stretch for four to six inches. And within the slime glands, each thread is coiled like a ball of yarn within its own tiny cell—a feat akin to stuffing a kilometer of Christmas lights into a shoebox without a single knot or tangle. No one knows how the hagfish achieves this miracle of packaging, but Fudge just got a grant to test one idea. He thinks that the thread cells use their nuclei—the DNA-containing structures at their core—like a spindle, turning them to wind the growing protein threads into a single continuous loop.
A microscope image of a hagfish’s coiled slime thread (Courtesy of Douglas Fudge)

Once these cells are expelled from the slime glands, they rupture, releasing the threads within them. Ewoldt’s colleague Gaurav Chaudhury found that despite their length, the threads can fully unspool in a fraction of a second. The pull of flowing water is enough to unwind them. But the process is even quicker if the loose end snags on a surface, like another thread, or a predator’s mouth.

Being extremely soft, the slime is very good at filling crevices, and scientists had long assumed that hagfish use it to clog the gills of would-be predators. That hypothesis was only confirmed in 2011, when Vincent Zintzen from the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa finally captured footage of hagfish sliming conger eels, wreckfish, and more. Even a shark was forced to retreat, visibly gagging on the cloud of slime in its jaws.

“We were blown away by those videos,” Fudge says, “but when we really looked carefully, we noticed that the slime is released after the hagfish is bitten.” So how does the animal survive that initial attack? His colleague Sarah Boggett showed that the answer lies in their skin. It’s exceptionally loose, and attaches to the rest of the body at only a few places. It’s also very flaccid: You could inject a hagfish with an extra 40 percent of its body volume without stretching the skin. The animal is effectively wearing a set of extremely loose pajamas, Fudge says. If a shark bites down, “the body sort of squishes out of the way.”

That ability makes hagfish not only hard to bite, but also hard to defend against. Calli Freedman, another member of Fudge’s team, showed that these animals can wriggle through slits less than half the width of their bodies. In the wild, they use that ability to great effect. They can hunt live fish by pulling them out of sandy burrows. And if disturbed by predators, they can dive into the nearest nook they find. Perhaps that’s why, in 2013, the Italian researcher Daniela Silvia Pace spotted a bottlenose dolphin with a hagfish stuck in its blowhole.

More commonly, these creatures burrow into dead or dying animals, in search of flesh to scavenge. They can’t bite; instead, they rasp away at carcasses with a plate of toothy cartilage in their mouths. The same traveling knots they use to de-slime themselves also help them eat. They grab into a cadaver, then move a knot from tail to head, using the leverage to yank out mouthfuls of meat. They can also eat by simply sitting inside a corpse, and absorbing nutrients directly through their skin and gills. The entire hagfish is effectively a large gut, and even that is understating matters: Their skin is actually more efficient at absorbing nutrients than their own intestines.

Hagfish on display at a seafood market (Elizabeth Beard / Getty)

Hagfish are so thoroughly odd that biologists have struggled to clearly work out how they’re related to other fish, and to the other backboned vertebrates. Based on their simple anatomy, many researchers billed the creatures as primitive precursors to vertebrates—an intermediate form that existed before the evolution of jaws and spinal columns.

But a new fossil called Tethymyxine complicates that story. Hailing from a Lebanese quarry, and purchased by researchers at a fossil show in Tucson, Arizona, the Cretaceous-age creature is clearly a hagfish. It has a raspy cartilage plate in its mouth, slime glands dotting its flanks, and even chemicals within those glands that match the composition of modern slime. By comparing Tethymyxine to other hagfish, Tetsuto Miyashita from the University of Chicago concluded that these creatures (along with another group of jawless fish, the lampreys) are not precursors to vertebrates, but actual vertebrates themselves.

Such work is always contentious, but it fits with the results of genetic studies. If it’s right, then hagfish aren’t primitive evolutionary throwbacks at all. Instead, they represent a lineage of vertebrates that diverged from all the others about 550 million years ago, and lost several traits such as complex eyes, taste buds, scales, and perhaps even bones. Maybe those losses were adaptations to a life spent infiltrating carcasses in the dark, deep ocean, much like their flaccid, nutrient-absorbing skins are. “Hagfishes might look primitive; they’re actually very specialized,” Miyashita adds.

Their signature slime might have also evolved as a result of that lifestyle, as a way of fending off predators that were competing for cadavers. “Everything about hagfish is weird,” says Fudge, “but it all kind of fits.”


Ed Yong is a former staff writer at The Atlantic. He won the Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting for his coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Friday, February 26, 2021

New research on hagfish provides insight into evolutionary origin of the eye

U of A biologists studying hagfish eyes uncover unexpected similarities to those of other vertebrates, including humans.

UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA

Research News

IMAGE

IMAGE: AN ADULT HAGFISH IN A CONTAINER FILLED WITH SEA WATER. NEW U OF A RESEARCH REVEALS UNEXPECTED SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE EYES OF HAGFISH AND THOSE OF OTHER VERTEBRATES INCLUDING HUMANS,... view more 

CREDIT: RYAN WAYNE

The answer to the age-old mystery of the evolutionary origins of vertebrate eyes may lie in hagfish, according to a new study by biologists at the University of Alberta.

"Hagfish eyes can help us understand the origins of human vision by expanding our understanding of the early steps in vertebrate eye evolution," explained lead author Emily Dong, who conducted the research during her graduate studies with Ted Allison, a professor in the Faculty of Science and member of the U of A's Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute. "Our findings solidify the hagfish's place among vertebrates and open the door to further research to uncover the finer details of their visual system."

For years, hagfish eyes were thought to be different from those of vertebrates--so the researchers were surprised to discover hagfish eyes contain many of the same features. These include neurons that connect light-sensitive photoreceptors to ganglion cells, continued growth of the eye late into adulthood, and a hidden layer of support cells that are prominent in other vertebrates and are key to photoreceptor function.

"This is important because it broadens the picture of early vertebrate eye evolution," explained Dong. "The fossil record can only provide us limited information, because soft tissues like eyes do not preserve well. And so we look to living members of these early lineages, such as the hagfish."

Hagfish are the most ancient line of vertebrates still living today, representing vertebrates before the evolutionary appearance of the jaw or paired fins, such as limbs. As a result, studying hagfish provides important information about early evolution in vertebrates, setting the foundation for what scientists can learn by studying other animal models such as zebrafish and mice.

"The data shed light on the confusing and dimly lit evolutionary origins of the vertebrate eye," added Allison, professor in the Department of Biological Sciences and Dong's master's supervisor.

###

Dong is now a PhD student at the University of Toronto. The research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre.

The study, "Vertebrate features revealed in the rudimentary eye of the Pacific hagfish (Eptatretus stoutii)," was published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Sunday, January 11, 2026

 

Revealing the diversity of olfactory receptors in hagfish and its implications for early vertebrate evolution




University of Tsukuba
Inshore hagfish (Eptatretus burgeri) 

image: 

Inshore hagfish (Eptatretus burgeri)

view more 

Credit: Tsukuru Maeda





Tsukuba, Japan—Animals, including humans, rely on their sense of smell to locate food, avoid predators, and communicate. This sensory ability depends on specialized receptor proteins. In vertebrates, four major receptor families mediate olfaction; these include olfactory receptors (ORs), vomeronasal type 1 receptors (V1Rs), vomeronasal type 2 receptors (V2Rs), and trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). However, the evolutionary origin and early diversification patterns of these receptor classes remain poorly understood.

In this study, University of Tsukuba researchers examined the hagfish genome for genes linked to ORs. In total, they identified 48 OR genes, 2 V1R genes, a surprisingly large set of 135 V2R genes, and no TAAR gene. Subsequent expression analyses confirmed that most of these genes were actively expressed in the olfactory organ, indicating that they may play functional roles in smell perception. Notably, the presence of true V2Rs in hagfish overturns the long-standing assumption that these receptors evolved only in jawed vertebrates. Conversely, the results of this study suggest that functional V2Rs were already present in the common ancestor of all vertebrates and that they subsequently diversified in a lineage-specific manner. Overall, this discovery provides critical insight into the evolution of vertebrate olfaction and underscores the importance of hagfish as a model for reconstructing the sensory biology of early vertebrates.

###
This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; Grant Numbers JP20K15855, JP22K15164, JP24K09556, and JP24H01538 to D.G.S, and JP19K16178 to Y.Y.) and by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society (Grant Number 2023-4098 to H.K.).

 

Original Paper

Title of original paper:
Hagfish olfactory repertoire illuminates lineage-specific diversification of olfaction in basal vertebrates

Journal:
iScience

DOI:
10.1016/j.isci.2025.114118

Correspondence

Assistant Professor SUZUKI, Daichi G.
Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba

KARIYAYAMA, Hirofumi
(Current position: Visiting Researcher of the RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR))
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba

Assistant Professor YAMAGUCHI, Yoko
Institute of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Academic Assembly, Shimane University

Related Link

Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences

Friday, June 23, 2023

Scientists discover troubling explanation behind recent whale death: ‘It’s heartbreaking to see this kind of destruction’



Hayleigh Evans
Fri, June 23, 2023

A dead sperm whale washed ashore in Hawaii on Jan. 27, and scientists suspect they have found the culprit: plastic.

What happened?


Scientists believe the whale, which beached in Kauai, died from ingesting fishing traps and nets, plastic bags, and other marine debris. The 56-foot, 120,000-pound marine mammal had foreign objects at the opening of its intestinal tract that prevented it from digesting its food.

“This is the first sperm whale in Hawaiian waters where we have seen this kind of ingestion of discarded fishing gear and nets,” Kristi West, the director of the University of Hawaii’s Health and Stranding Lab, said in a press release. “It’s heartbreaking to see this kind of destruction in an individual animal.”

After examining the whale’s stomach, scientists found six hagfish traps, seven varieties of fishing nets, two kinds of plastic bags, and multiple fishing lines. The whale’s stomach was so big that researchers were unable to study its entirety and believe there were more items they could not recover.

Why is this whale death concerning?


The whale death is a jarring reminder of how dangerous plastic pollution is to marine life. Even creatures as large as sperm whales can fall victim to plastic debris in the ocean.

Researchers estimate there are 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic waste in the ocean. Roughly 269,000 tons of this waste floats on the ocean surface, and about four billion plastic microfibers per square kilometer pollute the deep sea.

Not only does this pose a risk to marine life that mistake these items for food, but it can also contaminate human food. Toxins from plastic pollution contaminate fish, and humans are exposed to these toxins when eating seafood.

What can I do to help protect marine life?

Plastic waste is endangering marine species, and it is our responsibility to reduce ocean pollution. Luckily, there are a variety of solutions everyone can participate in.

The simplest way to fight plastic pollution is to reduce our reliance on single-use plastics. There are many reusable products that you can introduce to your daily life to replace these items.

When you go shopping, bring reusable grocery bags, and instead of using plastic water bottles, try carrying around a reusable one.

Participating in beach or river cleanups or donating to organizations that conduct them, like 4ocean or The Ocean Cleanup, is the most direct way to prevent ocean plastic pollution. Clearing trash from coastlines not only saves the ocean from plastic debris, but you may also save a life.

Join our free newsletter for cool news and cool tips that make it easy to help yourself while helping the planet.

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

 

Chip-shop fish among key seabed engineers




University of Exeter

Atlantic cod 

image: 

Atlantic cod

view more 

Credit: Alex Mustard





Many of the fish we eat play a key role in maintaining the seabed – and therefore our climate, new research shows.

Convex Seascape Survey scientists assessed the role of fish in bioturbation (churning and reworking sediments) in shallow UK seas.

The Atlantic cod – a staple in chip shops – jointly topped the list of these important “ecosystem engineers” (along with Atlantic hagfish and European eel).

In total, 185 fish species were found to play a role in bioturbation – and 120 of these are targeted by commercial fishing.

“Ocean sediments are the world’s largest reservoir of organic carbon – so what happens on the seabed matters for our climate,” said University of Exeter PhD student Mara Fischer, who led the study.

“Bioturbation is very important for how the seabed takes up and stores organic carbon, so the process is vital to our understanding of how the ocean absorbs greenhouse gases to slow the rate of climate change.

“Bioturbation is also important for seabed and wider ocean ecosystems.

“We have a good understanding of how invertebrates contribute to global bioturbation – but until now, we have been missing half the story.

“Our study is the first to attempt to quantify the bioturbation impact of fish, and it shows they play a significant, widespread role.”  

Overfished and overlooked

Co-author Professor Callum Roberts, from the Centre for Ecology and Conservation at Exeter’s Penryn Campus in Cornwall, said: “We also found that species with the highest bioturbation impacts are among the most vulnerable to threats such as commercial fishing.

“Many of the largest and most powerful diggers and disturbers of seabed sediments, like giant skates, halibut and cod, have been so overfished they have all but vanished from our seas.

“These losses translate into big, but still uncertain, changes in the way seabed ecosystems work.”

The researchers examined records for all fish species living on the UK continental shelf, and found more than half have a role in bioturbation – sifting and excavating sediment during foraging, burrowing and/or building nests.

These different ways of reworking the sediments – termed bioturbation modes – alongside the size of the fish and the frequency of bioturbation, were used by the researchers to calculate a bioturbation impact score for each species.

Examples include:

  • European eel. Bioturbation mode: burrower. Bioturbation score (out of 125): 100. IUCN conservation status: critically endangered. Fished primarily using traps and fyke nets, they are considered a delicacy in many parts of Europe and Asia – commonly prepared as smoked eel or dishes like eel pie and eel soup. Threats include climate change, diseases and parasites, habitat loss, pollutants and fishing.
  • Atlantic cod. Bioturbation mode: vertical excavator. Bioturbation score: 100. IUCN status: vulnerable. Primarily fished using trawling and longlining, they are consumed in many forms, including fish and chips, fresh fillets, salted cod, and cod liver oil. Threats include overfishing, climate change and habitat degradation. Populations have declined in several parts of its range, particularly the North Sea and West Atlantic.
  • Common skate. Bioturbation mode: lateral excavator. Bioturbation score: 50. IUCN status: critically endangered. Historically targeted by trawling and longlining, this species is now protected in several regions – but often caught accidentally (bycatch). Numbers have drastically declined due to overfishing. The species is vulnerable due to its large size, slow growth rate, and low reproductive rate – only about 40 eggs are laid every other year, and each generation takes 11 years to reach maturity.
  • Black seabream. Bioturbation mode: nest builder. Bioturbation score: 36. IUCN status: least concern. Primarily caught using bottom trawling, gillnets, and hook and line. Fishing during the spawning season in April and May can impact population replenishment. Bottom trawling at this time has the potential to remove the fish, nests and eggs.
  • Red gurnard. Bioturbation mode: sediment sifter. Bioturbation score: 16. IUCN status: least concern. Historically not of major interest to commercial fisheries, the species has been targeted more in recent years (including in Cornwall). It is mainly caught by trawlers. There is currently no management for any gurnard species in the EU: no minimum landing size, no quota, etc – which could lead to unsustainable fishing.

Julie Hawkins, another author of the study, commented: “Anyone who has spent time underwater, whether snorkelling or diving, knows that fish are constantly digging up the seabed.

“It’s hard to believe that such an obvious and important activity has been largely overlooked when it comes to understanding ocean carbon burial.”

The Convex Seascape Survey is a partnership between Blue Marine Foundation, the University of Exeter and Convex Group Limited. The ambitious five-year global research programme is the largest attempt yet to build a greater understanding of the properties and capabilities of the ocean and its continental shelves in the earth’s carbon cycle, in the urgent effort to slow climate change.

The paper, published in the journal Marine Environmental Research, is entitled: “A functional assessment of fish as bioturbators and their vulnerability to local extinction.”