Showing posts sorted by date for query WASTEWATER. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query WASTEWATER. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, July 09, 2026

Biochar turns rice straw into a stronger tool for farming salty soils



A two-year field study shows that straw-derived biochar outperformed direct straw return in helping rice cope with saline-sodic stress, use nitrogen more efficiently, and produce higher yields



Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University

Straw-derived biochar was more effective than direct straw return in mitigating soda saline-sodic stress and improving nitrogen use efficiency in rice grown in saline-sodic fields 

image: 

Straw-derived biochar was more effective than direct straw return in mitigating soda saline-sodic stress and improving nitrogen use efficiency in rice grown in saline-sodic fields

view more 

Credit: Feng Jin, Chuchu Wang, Xudong Wang, Yang Song, Qingyu Wang, Hange Liu, Hongyue Wang, Tao Wu, Wenzhu Jiang, Yu Lan, Ting Cao, Xinquan Hou, Shuang Hua & Chao Huang





Rice straw is often returned directly to fields to improve soil health, but in highly saline-sodic soils, where salt, alkalinity, and poor structure slow decomposition, that strategy may not work fast enough. A new study published in Biochar reports that converting rice straw into biochar before returning it to the field can offer a more effective route for sustainable rice production in salt-affected regions.

The study, led by Feng Jin and colleagues, compared three straw management strategies in saline-sodic paddy fields: straw removal, direct rice straw return, and rice straw-derived biochar return. The researchers also tested four nitrogen fertilizer levels, including no nitrogen, low nitrogen, a locally common nitrogen rate of 225 kg ha⁻¹, and a higher rate. The field experiment was conducted over two rice-growing seasons from 2023 to 2024 in Baicheng City, Jilin Province, China, an important region of soda saline-sodic soils.

Our results show that biochar is not simply another form of straw return. It changes how the rice plant responds to salt stress and how efficiently it uses nitrogen,” said corresponding author Feng Jin. “For saline-sodic paddy fields, straw-derived biochar combined with moderate nitrogen input could provide a practical strategy for improving yield while making better use of fertilizer.

Saline-sodic soils create several problems for crops. High sodium levels disrupt the balance between sodium and potassium inside plants, while salt and alkalinity can trigger oxidative stress and reduce nutrient uptake. In this study, both direct straw return and biochar helped rice plants under stress, but biochar produced stronger and more consistent improvements.

Compared with straw removal, biochar reduced sodium accumulation in rice leaves and lowered the Na⁺/K⁺ ratio, a key indicator of salt injury. At the same time, it increased potassium concentration and improved stress-related protective responses, including higher soluble protein and proline contents and stronger antioxidant enzyme activities. Biochar also reduced oxidative stress markers such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and superoxide anions.

The benefits extended beyond stress protection. The researchers found that straw-derived biochar enhanced nitrogen metabolism by increasing the activity of key enzymes, including nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthase. It also upregulated genes involved in nitrogen uptake and assimilation, such as OsNR1, OsNRT1;1, OsNRT2;1, OsGS1;1, OsGS2, OsGDH2, and OsFd-GOGAT.

These physiological changes translated into measurable gains in nitrogen use and yield. Under biochar return, total nitrogen accumulation increased by 22.44% to 39.58%, and nitrogen use efficiency increased by 16.49% to 22.07% compared with straw removal. Grain yield under biochar return was 16.25% higher than straw removal and 4.04% higher than direct straw return.

The study also found that direct straw return showed delayed benefits. A significant yield difference between direct straw return and straw removal appeared only in the second year, not in the first. By contrast, biochar had a stronger overall effect across the measured plant stress, nitrogen metabolism, and yield indicators.

Using structural equation modeling, the authors identified a pathway linking biochar application to improved rice performance: biochar first alleviated physiological stress, then enhanced nitrogen metabolism, which improved nitrogen efficiency and ultimately increased grain yield.

The authors conclude that rice straw-derived biochar combined with 225 kg ha⁻¹ nitrogen was the most effective strategy tested. The findings suggest that turning straw into biochar could help farmers make better use of crop residues while improving productivity in saline-sodic paddy fields.

 

=== 

Journal Reference: Jin, F., Wang, C., Wang, X. et al. Straw-derived biochar was more effective than direct straw return in mitigating soda saline-sodic stress and improving nitrogen use efficiency in rice grown in saline-sodic fields. Biochar 8, 125 (2026).   

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-026-00619-7   

=== 

About Biochar

Biochar (e-ISSN: 2524-7867) is the first journal dedicated exclusively to biochar research, spanning agronomy, environmental science, and materials science. It publishes original studies on biochar production, processing, and applications—such as bioenergy, environmental remediation, soil enhancement, climate mitigation, water treatment, and sustainability analysis. The journal serves as an innovative and professional platform for global researchers to share advances in this rapidly expanding field. 

Follow us on Facebook, X, and Bluesky.  

Wednesday, July 08, 2026

 

Hotter, drier weather could double water bills in some cities, Stanford study finds





Stanford University






WATCH RELATED VIDEO HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6I-qK-4si0

In Brief

  • Hotter, drier conditions driven by climate change could nearly double water bills in some cities by mid-century, according to a Stanford-led study.
  • Researchers found that costly drought-resilience projects, such as desalination and water reuse systems, could push many low-income households into severe water affordability crises.
  • The study suggests current financing models are ill-equipped to balance reliable water supplies with affordable access as climate pressures intensify.

Hotter, drier weather threatens to double water bills by mid-century in some cities, according to a Stanford-led study. The research, published July 8 in Nature Sustainability, is the first to comprehensively model how climate change, infrastructure investment, and household water demand can combine to compound an already growing affordability crisis.

"Climate change stresses water supplies, and forces utilities to build expensive new infrastructure to maintain reliability,” said study lead author Jennifer Skerker, a PhD student in civil and environmental engineering at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability and the Stanford School of Engineering while working on the study. “In cities already struggling with affordability due to aging infrastructure, the additional costs passed on to ratepayers to pay for additional infrastructure and reliability measures can push a substantial share of households into crisis.”

The average cost of tap water in the United States has increased three times faster than inflation over the past two decades, driven largely by aging infrastructure and deferred maintenance. Climate change is layering a new and poorly understood pressure on top of those existing strains, according to Skerker and her study coauthors.

To understand how predicted changes in temperature and rainfall over the next two decades are likely to affect local water supplies and costs, the research team analyzed data from Santa Cruz, California. The small coastal city relies almost entirely on local surface water and a single reservoir. The local utility has implemented many lower-cost conservation options, such as water-saving appliances and reduced irrigation, necessitating infrastructure investments for climate resilience.

Using a modeling framework developed with data from Santa Cruz's water department, the researchers linked plausible future climate scenarios with utility adaptation decisions, such as building a wastewater reuse facility, methods for pricing water, and household-level water demand. Among the results: measures taken to adapt to less water availability could lead to a near doubling of median water bills in Santa Cruz by mid-century. Paying for major new infrastructure could push the share of households exceeding the EPA’s recommended affordability threshold from the 19% to 35%, according to the study’s findings.

The model showed median water bills for the poorest residents could rise from around $60 to $111 per month (in today’s dollars) under a dry climate scenario. More than 5% of households would have to devote as much as a third of their income to water, likely forcing painful trade-offs with food, healthcare, and other necessities.

Different infrastructure strategies produced starkly different outcomes. A risk-averse approach that built large desalination capacity early provided strong supply reliability, but at a steep cost to affordability. A more cautious approach that delayed investments kept bills lower but left the system dangerously exposed during droughts, providing reliable water supply in only 6 out of 10 years on average. 

The modeling framework can be adapted to assess water affordability risks in cities – such as Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Cape Town, and Melbourne, Australia – facing vulnerabilities similar to those of Santa Cruz. Even cities that seem more resilient now would do well to pay attention. They could become vulnerable over time as climate stress intensifies and utilities raise water rates, according to the researchers.

"The bottom line is that under today's financing and regulatory models, climate adaptation and water affordability are on a collision course,” said study senior author Sarah Fletcher, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering and a center fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. “Ensuring reliable water access for everyone is going to require interventions at the state and federal level that go far beyond what individual utilities can do on their own.”

 

Other coauthors of the study include Christian Klassert of the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; Baptiste Francois and Casey Brown of the University of Massachusetts; and Aniket Verma, a Ph.D. student in civil and environmental engineering at Stanford.

Tuesday, July 07, 2026

High levels of forever chemicals found on wastewater filters




A significant buildup of “forever chemical” concentrations on reverse osmosis filters used in desalination and advanced wastewater treatment highlights the need for proper handling, disposal and recycling.





Texas A&M University

Reverse osmosis facility 

image: 

A reverse osmosis facility featuring hundreds of filters used in water treatment.

view more 

Credit: Dr. Shankar Chellam






As cities across the nation and the globe increasingly turn to advanced water purification systems to expand their drinking water supplies, researchers at Texas A&M University have identified a critical environmental safety consideration. A new study from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering shows that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” accumulate significantly on the purification filters used in advanced treatment to recycle wastewater into drinking water.

This breakthrough research examines a real-world potable reuse facility, where municipal wastewater is currently treated to very high standards to produce safe drinking water. Although the technology effectively removes contaminants, the study shows for the first time that microscopic trapping of harmful chemicals causes significant accumulation on the filters over their operational lifespan.

These findings carry implications for public health and environmental policy. When water utilities replace thousands of worn-out filtration membranes, the accumulated PFAS could pose risks to workers handling the equipment or leach into local groundwater if the components are discarded improperly. By detailing exactly how and where these persistent chemicals accumulate, the research provides engineers with the foundational data needed to develop safer disposal protocols and advanced cleaning techniques.

Civil and environmental engineering professor Dr. Shankar Chellam, his post-doctoral fellow Dr. Onkar Ekande, his former Ph.D. student Dr. Bilal Abada, and Brent Alspach, director of applied research at Arcadis, were co-authors of the study, published in the Journal of Membrane Science.

The research team analyzed several commercial reverse osmosis filters — coiled, sheet-like polymer membranes — that had been operating for four consecutive years at a full-scale potable reuse facility. 

“Reverse osmosis is excellent at removing PFAS, just like it’s excellent at removing salts,” said Chellam. “It’s literally a desalination technology, and it is good for removing a lot of contaminants, but it’s expensive.”

Reverse osmosis works by forcing water through a dense, highly selective polymer membrane under high pressure, leaving salts, minerals and contaminants behind. Because wastewater contains much higher levels of PFAS than typical freshwater sources like lakes or rivers, these filters face an intense barrage of chemical pollutants over years of continuous service in a potable reuse plant.

This research addresses a crucial gap by analyzing the concentrations of these chemicals on the filters themselves. The team discovered that long-chain PFAS compounds often bind strongly to organic and biological fouling layers — slimes or biofilms composed of proteins, sugars and microorganisms — that naturally form on filter surfaces over time.

“There could be a correlation between the bio-organic fouling and PFAS accumulation on the filter surfaces,” said Abada. “In all but the very last filtration stage, we found organic fouling.”

The researchers discovered that long-chain, water-repelling PFAS variants accounted for two-thirds of the trapped chemical mass in the initial stages of membranes. Additionally, chemical precursors — compounds that degrade over time into more stable forms of PFAS — accounted for another 14% of the accumulation. In contrast, the final stage of the filtration system, which was dominated by chalky mineral scales rather than organic slime, retained almost no PFAS.

“PFAS is toxic at very low concentrations, and they have been reported in numerous drinking water sources and wastewater,” said Chellam. “The removal technologies currently in use, such as reverse osmosis, take a water stream that is relatively dilute in PFAS and concentrate the toxic chemicals to much higher levels on the filters.”

The conclusions drawn from this study add critical data on a widely concerning pollutant and support policymaking and regulatory oversight. Future research on PFAS mitigation technologies can also benefit from these results in terms of membrane life cycle analysis.

“The problem of membrane use, cleaning and disposal will only become bigger and bigger,” said Abada. “Even if we become more efficient and make the membranes last longer, we still have to figure out how to safely handle and dispose of them once they reach their end of life.”

As water-stressed communities continue to adopt advanced recycling technologies, these insights help ensure they can do so with a better understanding of the impact of PFAS accumulation on membrane lifecycles.

By Justin Agan, Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University

###