Monday, April 06, 2020

ECONOMY PORTENTS OF THINGS TO COME
How ugly could it get? Trump faces echoes of 1929 in coronavirus crisis.

Forecasters see historic job losses and deep economic pain on the horizon — but with a sharp rebound, if Congress steps up.


Pedestrians walk by the New York Stock Exchange in New York City.
 | Spencer Platt/Getty Images


By BEN WHITE POLITICO 03/16/2020

The early signals from the coronavirus crisis point to a scale of damage unseen in the modern U.S. economy: the potential for millions of jobs lost in a single month, a historic and sudden plunge in economic activity across the nation and a pace of sharp market swings not seen since the Great Depression.

As the coronavirus outbreak ravages a paralyzed nation, Wall Street suffered another brutal bloodbath on Monday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average diving around 13 percent in its worst percentage loss since 1987’s “Black Monday” crash. A reading on business conditions in the New York area plunged a record 34.4 points to -21.5 in March, suggesting a recession is underway that could be sharp and deep as revenue quickly bleeds out of major industries from airlines to hotels, restaurants, bars and sports leagues.

The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, the broadest gauge of U.S. companies, fell 12 percent. It has shed $6 trillion in value since peaking in February, slamming retirement accounts for millions of Americans in ways that could have psychological ripples for many months to come. The last time the S&P had three days of similar wild swings was 1929, on the eve of the Great Depression.

The S&P is now only around 300 points away from wiping out all its gains since Donald Trump won the White House in November 2016. President Trump himself, one of the grandest boasters of the strength and resilience of markets and the American economy, appeared to capitulate on Monday with a more somber tone reflecting the immense magnitude of the challenge facing the nation.

“We have an invisible enemy,” he said, acknowledging that the virus could push the U.S. into recession. “This is a bad one. This is a very bad one.” Trump urged Americans not to gather in groups over 10 and to avoid bars, restaurants, food courts and other public spaces.

The VIX, a gauge of fear and panic on Wall Street, hit 82.69 on Monday — bringing it to territory unseen since the worst of the financial crisis in 2008. Oil prices tanked 10 percent — after a severe plunge last week — as traders bet the virus will ignite a global recession that sharply reduces demand for fuel.

The massive sell-offs have led to suggestions by market professionals that regulators may have to take dramatic steps seen during the Great Depression and after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That could include shuttering Wall Street — perhaps for days — until more is known about the direction of the coronavirus spread in the United States and until Washington comes up with a massive, bipartisan policy response to shore up flagging industries and direct money straight into the pockets of American citizens losing work as they remain shuttered in their homes at the direction of the government officials.

For now, Securities and Exchange Commissioner Jay Clayton pledged to keep markets open, despite the waves of panicked selling. “Markets should continue to function through times like this,” he told CNBC. Still, many traders expect that if the market plunges several more thousand points, and trips more circuit breakers that temporarily halt trading, the administration could be forced to simply shut Wall Street down.

“With new measures being put in place by the hour, the federal government at some point will have to consider a modern version of the bank holiday imposed by the Roosevelt administration back in 1933,” RSM Chief Economist Joseph Brusuelas wrote in a client note. “That four-day holiday was put into place to restore confidence in the banking and financial system. Perhaps the governing authority should consider a 10-business day holiday until Congress can act.”

Wall Street analysts are already assessing the damage done to the economy thus far: stark and likely to get far worse, very quickly.

“Movie box-office revenues are down more than 60 percent in data through March 15 and more than 70 percent relative to the average of recent years,” JPMorgan analysts wrote in a research note. “Broadway box office revenues were already down about 20 percent relative to trend in data through March 8, and are presumably set to be down essentially 100 percent after theaters closed last Thursday, a result we also expect to see for professional and college sports revenues.”

Restaurant bookings were collapsing in many cities and may now plunge to zero. Streets are increasingly empty as citizens follow government warnings to slow the spread of the virus.


The hope on the part of White House officials is not to avoid a sharp economic slowdown — they all know it is coming — but that the short-term pain from extreme measures will lead to a flattening in the curve of the virus spread. Then economic activity can be made up when the crisis ebbs.

But that will require agreement on a massive package of aid for both individuals and corporations to stave off mass bankruptcies and waves of layoffs. The White House hopes for a V-shaped economic cycle this time: a recession in which growth plunges then sharply recovers as consumers emerge from their bunkers with jobs to go to and money to spend.

Kevin Hassett, the former White House Council of Economic Advisers chairman who remains in contact with Trump and the White House, said in an interview that jobs reports for March and April could show horrific numbers that will force massive congressional action if it has not already occurred by then.

He predicted losses of perhaps over 1 million jobs in coming reports and a spike in the jobless rate. “We really could see the worst jobs reports we’ve ever seen in our history.”

Hassett said he did calculations over the weekend with conservative economist Larry Lindsey showing that the economy could contract by 5 percent in the second quarter, though a swift containment of the virus could lead to a bounce-back in the third quarter. (Goldman Sachs economists also predicted a drop of around 5 percent in economic growth in the second quarter.)

And he noted that infighting between the House and Senate and uncertainty about the next stimulus package from the White House could make matters far worse. The White House is trying to settle on a package that would include a payroll tax suspension and emergency lending facilities, including from the Federal Reserve, and other measures for impacted businesses that would stop short of direct cash “bailouts,” a politically toxic word since the bank rescues of 2008 and 2009.

Thomas Modly’s Toxic Masculinity Looks Far More ‘Stupid’ Than Crozier

Thomas Modly, Acting Secretary of the Navy, recently blasted fired Navy captain on his own ship. His immature tirade has received little support. He's just the latest example of how we're not going to beat this virus with rage or arrogance.


Thomas B. Modly has not gained many fans in recent days. | Source: SAUL LOEB / AFP

Thomas B. Modly has not gained many fans in recent days. | Source: SAUL LOEB / AFP

Thomas Modly tried to disgrace fired Navy Captain Brett Crozier for being concerned about his crew.

Modly called him “stupid” and “naive.” Modly is clearly the stupid one if he thought anyone was going to take his side.

He’s just the latest of many immature men getting exposed by the coronavirus.

Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly is under fire again. After firing Navy Captain Brett Crozier last week for asking the Navy to help him with the coronavirus outbreak on his ship, Modly called him “naive” and “stupid.”Thomas Modly has a tantrum. | Source: Twitter

But Crozier clearly did not ring the alarm soon enough. Yesterday, Crozier tested positive for COVID-19, and now Modly looks ignorant once again.
Thomas Modly Loses His S*!T

According to the New York Times, Modly seized the intercom mic of the U.S. Theodore Roosevelt and bashed its recently departed commander.

In response to Crozier’s leaked plea for help, Modly called him “too naïve or too stupid to be a commanding officer.” Adding, “the alternative is that he did this on purpose.”

Shockingly, the crew seemed to side with the guy who tried to save their lives.




One crew member described Modly’s tirade as “whiny, upset, irritated, condescending.” Virginia Senator Tim Kaine said Modly was “completely inappropriate.”

Kaine continues:

It’s deeply disappointing that he would deliver a speech onboard a U.S. aircraft carrier suggesting that Captain Crozier might be ‘stupid’ and bashing the media for trying to report the truth. These dedicated sailors deserve better from their leadership.

Kaine is right. Modly’s arrogant, aggressive takedown is typical of the toxic masculine energy that has not gelled with this virus.
‘We Expected Him To Be The Calming Force On A Turbulent Sea’

On a ship of nearly 5,000 people, 173 have already tested positive. Considering the tragedies that befell other large boats with a coronavirus outbreak, it makes sense that Crozier felt a sense of urgency.

It makes even more sense when you consider that he was coming down with symptoms himself before the press leaked his letter. According to the NYT, Modly wouldn’t even tour the ship when he visited.Unsurprisingly, people are not siding with Modly. | Source: Twitter

At different points in his unhinged speech, Thomas Modly criticized China and Joe Biden.

But perhaps the most ironic of all is when he said: “We expected him to be the calming force on a turbulent sea.” Way to model that behavior, Modly.


Toxic Masculinity Is Not Wearing This Pandemic Well


There’s a wave of guys who seem to think they can beat this virus by punching it, ignoring it, or pretending it’s not there.

No one displayed this behavior in a more hilarious way than NBA player Rudy Gobert. Gobert wanted to show everyone how tough he was by rubbing his hands all over microphones at a press conference last month.

A few days later, he tested positive for COVID-19. Not only that, but he likely infected his teammate Donovan Mitchell.

Thomas Modly’s antics are coming off as childish and disrespectful. He’s trying to play the enforcer, but people are seeing through him. And as they continue to side with Crozier, Modly gets more and more upset. He’s acting like a little boy who can’t get his way.

But of course, Modly and Crozier might not be in this mess if it weren’t for the Most Toxic of Them All. Donald Trump thought he could brush this virus off. He thought he was such a big, strong man that he could just speak it out of existence.


Well, Trump, what have you got to say now? Oh, that we’re heading for a “very, very painful two weeks”? Well, maybe if you hadn’t delayed action at seemingly every possible move, we wouldn’t be lapping the world with nearly 350,000 coronavirus cases.

The coronavirus is making people like Trump, Gobert, and Thomas Modly look like fools. Scared little boys will not lead us through this crisis. Please, fellas, take a knee and let the real men and women handle this.


Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of CCN.com.


This article was edited by Josiah Wilmoth.

Shocking Study Theorizes Compelling Mutated Coronavirus Origins

New studies suggest that while some coronavirus cases emerged from the wet market, earlier cases likely emerged from somewhere else.



The study also conclusively states the COVID-19 strain 
was not engineered in a laboratory. | 
Source: Handout / Daegu Metropolitan City Namgu / AFP)

A biotech firm’s study suggests that coronavirus may have mutated within the human body, then spread to other humans.
It also suggests there is not enough data to conclusively state the virus came from bats and pangolins.
Recent studies show that scientists are still in the process of understanding the real origin of the virus.

Many scientists have pointed towards the Wuhan seafood market as the origin of the Coronavirus (CODIV-19) outbreak in early 2020. New studies and findings suggest that while some cases emerged from the wet market, earlier cases likely emerged from somewhere else.

A study from The Scripps Research Institute found two possible sources of coronavirus, which may explain the emergence of the initial wave of COVID-19 cases in November 2019, prior to the cluster of cases that emerged in the Wuhan seafood market.Wuhan, the central Chinese city where the COVID-19 coronavirus first emerged last year, partly reopened on March 28 after more than two months of near total isolation for its population of 11 million. | Source: NOEL CELIS / AFP

The researchers identified the two origins to be: natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer and natural selection in humans following zoonotic (animal-to-human) transfer.
Coronavirus Could Have Mutated Within The Human Body

The first origin—mutation in an animal host—would mean that a form of virus mutated within wild animals in the likes of bats and pangolins before spreading to humans.


In this scenario, humans got in direct contact with animals that had mutated viruses within them, causing the first animal to human transmission to occur.

Researchers say that it is difficult to conclusively state that the Wuhan wet market is the origin of coronavirus because of the undersampled nature of studies that made the link between the market and the virus outbreak.

Prior to the batch of cases that were reported from the Wuhan seafood market, individuals reported coronavirus symptoms by as early as November 2019, which indicates that the coronavirus outbreak began before the wet market reported new cases.

The study read:

Neither the bat betacoronaviruses nor the pangolin betacoronaviruses sampled thus far have polybasic cleavage sites. Although no animal coronavirus has been identified that is sufficiently similar to have served as the direct progenitor of SARS-CoV-2, the diversity of coronaviruses in bats and other species is massively undersampled.

While the focus of the studies focused on the structure of the virus contained in bats, specifically Chinese Horseshoe bats, the study also emphasized that Malayan pangolins exhibit similarities to coronavirus.

The researchers explained:
Malayan pangolins (Manis javanica) illegally imported into Guangdong province contain coronaviruses similar to SARSCoV-221. Although the RaTG13 bat virus remains the closest to SARS-CoV-2 across the genome , some pangolin coronaviruses exhibit strong similarity to SARS-CoV-2 in the RBD, including all six key RBD residues.Breakdown of how potential sources of coronavirus bound with the human body (source: The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2)

The second scenario—natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer—suggests that a lesser form of coronavirus may have transferred from a bat or a pangolin to a human body, and the virus mutated within humans afterward.

As the virus started to mutate, it also began to transmit from humans to humans, causing the outbreak to start.

Recent research papers show that scientists are still discovering new data about coronavirus, and as time passes, scientists are becoming increasingly skeptical towards the initial understanding of the origin of the virus.
No Laboratory Manipulation, Though

The study eliminates the popular theory that the coronavirus emerged from a virus spill at the Wuhan laboratory. It said that the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of coronavirus is uniquely “optimized for binding to human ACE2,” which makes it highly unlikely for it to be a case of laboratory manipulation.

The study added:


Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.

It essentially makes the claim that the speed of the spread of coronavirus and its effectiveness in penetrating into the human body is far greater than any prediction that was made in the past.


This article was edited by Samburaj Das.

Now Watch: CCN TV




Joseph Young @iamjosephyoung

Financial analyst based in Seoul, South Korea. Contributing regularly to CCN and Forbes. I have covered the stock market and bitcoin since 2013.

SLAVOJ ZIZEK ON CORONAVRIUS THINGS WILL NOT BE THE SAME

The Coronavirus Crisis Can Reshape America’s Future – For the Better

It's an understatement to say that things are uncertain right now. America's way of life has been stopped in its tracks from the coronavirus.

Jon Hall @WriterJonHall




Despite all the pain that coronavirus has brought, America can come out of the pandemic stronger than ever. | Image: REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Amid the coronavirus pandemic, American life is up-in-the-air as President Trump warns of a “rough week” ahead.


It’s important to analyze an “after” once the virus has run its course and no more confirmed cases are announced.

The “after” will be co-dependent on what lessons the U.S. and other countries take heed of after the crisis.

The coronavirus, or COVID-19, has been spreading and infecting countries globally since the beginning of January.

U.S. Becomes Virus Epicenter

The U.S. recently became the most infected country worldwide, with confirmed cases now exceeding 335,000.

Although the initial epicenter in the nation was Seattle, Washington, New York quickly stole that title as both cases and deaths from the virus soared.
\Source: Flickr

President Trump has, again, warned that America is entering into its toughest week” of the coronavirus crisis, claiming “there will be death.

It’s an understatement to say that things are uncertain right now. America’s way of living has been stopped in its tracks.

No more dining out with friends and having drinks, or going to theaters with your children to see a matinee, or even just simple trips to the grocery store.

Despite the uncertainty (not to mention the death toll), the long-term impact of the coronavirus could potentially have its benefits.

It does need specification, of course, that any possible positive long-term effect doesn’t cancel out the short-term turmoil we are currently experiencing as things become more and more dire.

Long-Term, The Coronavirus Crisis May See The United States…
Rely less on globalism
Shift away from mass consumerism
Have a rise in both telemedicine and working from home
Experience a political shift

No matter what happens, if the United States and other countries don’t learn any lessons from the crisis after it’s over – any consequences, short or long-term won’t matter.

The U.S. government will need to realize what was critically impacted by the virus and brought to a standstill during the pandemic.

Globalism sees the goods we consume contracted out to factories and production facilities overseas.

Will the virus bring that production back into America so as to never rely on a single country ever again? If so, the vapid and shallow mass consumerism the U.S. seems to excel at might abate drastically.

A political shift would also likely occur. It wouldn’t go unnoticed by the public after experiencing rich communities potentially be better treated from the virus than poverty-stricken areas. Couple that with enormous bailouts for multi-million dollar corporations during an economic meltdown and there would surely be outcry.

With the constant doom and gloom plaguing our day-to-day lives, it’s important to be able to visualize an “after” in regards to the virus.

Once we are able to return to any semblance of daily life – whenever that may be – and cases of the coronavirus stop being confirmed, the only certainty is that the United States will be a nation changed and ready to rebuild stronger and more fortified than ever before.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of CCN.com

This article was edited by Sam Bourgi.

Jon Hall @WriterJonHall
Jon Hall is a U.S.-based reporter, consisting of coverage of U.S events, global affairs, and other stories you'd never see the mainstream media touch. He has been featured on Zerohedge and the Drudge Report. He can be reached at JonHallFMS@Protonmail.com for feedback or comments.






Can the Lessons of the Coronavirus Pandemic Be Applied to Climate Change?
Stewart M. Patrick Monday, April 6, 2020

Extremely light traffic moves toward downtown Los Angeles, California, March 20, 2020
 (AP photo by Mark J. Terrill).

As the world grapples with COVID-19, it cannot afford to ignore an even more serious global emergency that will persist long after the pandemic has passed: climate change. Last month, the United Nations issued a dire multiagency report warning that the world is “way off track” on its commitments to cut emissions under the Paris Agreement. Without dramatic and sustained emissions reductions, higher atmospheric and marine temperatures will bring more deadly heat waves, catastrophic storms, rising seas, food insecurity, health crises and mass displacement.

Although emissions have dropped sharply since January with the coronavirus pandemic virtually shutting down entire economies and most air travel, they are sure to surge again as the world economy roars back to life whenever the pandemic ends. Antonio Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, put it bluntly: “We will not fight climate change with a virus.” Indeed, the pandemic will make progress against global warming even more elusive.

Nobody welcomes a pandemic that threatens to kill millions, infect hundreds of millions more and throw the world into economic depression. Still, the dramatic global response to COVID-19 has captured many environmentalists’ imaginations, by showing what a less polluted planet might look like and suggesting how the world might mobilize to fight climate change.

Since January, China’s emissions have declined by a stunning 25 percent. Globally, they are poised to fall, perhaps dramatically, in 2020. Remarkable satellite imagery has also captured huge declines in emissions of nitrogen oxides and other forms of smog in Beijing, Los Angeles and New York, revealing brilliant blue skies unseen in decades. In Italy, the water in Venice’s canals is flowing clean again.

The global economic shutdown provides an alternative reality, or at least a “mirage,” of what could be if humanity managed to reduce its carbon footprint. It has also exposed just how dangerous air pollution is to human health. Marshall Burke, a professor of earth science at Stanford University, calculated in March that China’s shutdown had “likely saved the lives of 4,000 kids under 5 and 73,000 adults over 70”—20 times the deaths China had attributed to the coronavirus—thanks to a decline in pollution-related respiratory illnesses.

Unfortunately, the response to COVID-19 is more likely to frustrate than inspire strong global action on climate change. Governments will prioritize short-term economic goals over long-term sustainability, while loosening environmental regulations and their enforcement. Major corporations will delay clean energy investments. And many citizens will focus on pocketbook matters rather than advocate for a healthy biosphere. If history is any guide, emissions will rise steeply as the economy rebounds, just as they did after the energy shocks of the 1970s and the 2008 financial crash.

Before COVID-19, 2020 was poised to be the year of the environment. In April, the world would mark the 50th anniversary of Earth Day. In October, nations would gather in Kunming, China, for a major biodiversity conference. Finally, in November, the parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change would convene for their pivotal 26th conference, known as COP26, in Glasgow. The pandemic has dashed those hopes, displacing climate change from the top of the international agenda, disrupting environmental diplomacy and endangering scientific collaboration and climate funding. Last week, the UNFCCC announced that it would postpone COP26 until 2021, delaying a make-or-break meeting where governments are supposed to ratchet up the commitments they made in Paris in 2016.

The response to COVID-19 is more likely to frustrate than inspire strong global action on climate change.

The delay could not have come at a worse time. Most countries are lagging in their Paris Agreement pledges. But even if they were fully implemented, those commitments would achieve only a third of the emissions reductions needed to keep the rise in average global temperatures from preindustrial days below 1.5 degrees Celsius, the agreed Paris target. The global economic downturn makes it even less likely that world leaders will summon the political will or invest the funds needed to arrest global warming.

Fearing a prolonged recession, or even depression, governments are launching massive economic bailouts and rescue packages likely to shape the trajectory of emissions for years to come. Ideally, says Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, they would seize this “historic opportunity” to hasten the decarbonization of the world economy by investing heavily in clean energy technologies and infrastructure. The European Union, which last month doubled down on its $1 trillion Green Deal and recommitted itself to carbon neutrality by 2050, shows it can be done.

Few others are following suit, however. In most countries, the pandemic will delay any clean energy transition, as politicians cling to traditional growth models. In the United States, the Trump administration and Senate Republicans successfully rebuffed Democratic efforts to include clean energy investments and relief for renewable energy industries in the nation’s $2 trillion stimulus bill. More perniciously, the administration continues to roll back Obama-era limits on U.S. emissions, including from automobiles.

Similar dynamics are unfolding elsewhere. China has announced that it will relax some environmental regulations to allow companies to focus on economic growth. In Southeast Asia, where distracted governments have loosened supervision of logging companies and redeployed enforcement personnel to cities to cope with the pandemic, deforestation is poised to accelerate.

The private sector is unlikely to come to the rescue. Tighter capital markets will make it harder for corporations to secure funding for green energy investments. Cash-strapped energy companies will struggle to invest in solar, wind and other renewables that make up a growing share of their portfolios. And with plunging oil and natural gas prices, fossil fuel consumption is set to rise, hurting renewable energy companies and electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla.

Finally, public pressure to combat climate change will dissipate, as rising unemployment and basic pocketbook issues leave citizens, particularly young people, with less time and energy for environmental activism. Climate advocates had planned enormous protests for April 22 to mark the 50th Earth Day. Thanks to the coronavirus, these will occur online.

The international response to the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that massive behavioral changes—from social distancing to reduced airline travel—are indeed possible on a global scale. It is not clear that the lessons of the coronavirus can be applied to climate change, however, because the two policy problems differ in fundamental ways, most obviously in their time horizons. COVID-19 is an immediate, once-in-lifetime event that threatens human lives in the here and now. Climate change, in contrast, is a gradually unfolding planetary challenge whose many implications will only become truly manifest in coming decades.

It is commonplace in politics for the urgent to overwhelm the important. This is particularly true when the former inspires panic and the latter permits procrastination. Defeating the coronavirus requires societies and individuals to suffer acute, short-term pain, in the expectation that the pandemic will pass and economies will quickly recover. Decarbonization implies something more daunting: a transformation of the entire global economy, with attendant dislocation, to avoid a catastrophe that we sense is coming, but are only beginning to feel.

Stewart Patrick is the James H. Binger senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of “The Sovereignty Wars: Reconciling America with the World” (Brookings Press: 2018). His weekly WPR column appears every Monday.
Coronavirus: How Are Countries Responding to the Economic Crisis?
The coronavirus pandemic is slowing global commerce to a crawl, but many of the world’s largest economies are taking extraordinary actions to propel them through the crisis and, hopefully, into a rapid recovery.

Backgrounder by Jonathan Masters

April 2, 2020

A pedestrian wearing a protective face mask amid the the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak is reflected on a screen displaying stock prices outside a brokerage in Tokyo, Japan, on March 17, 2020. Issei Kato/Reuters



The coronavirus is throttling the global economy. In a matter of weeks, the highly contagious disease has pushed the world to the brink of a recession more severe than the 2008 financial crisis. The depth and duration of the downturn will depend on many factors, including the behavior of the virus itself, public health responses, and economic interventions. 

Given the extraordinary nature of the pandemic-induced crisis, fiscal and monetary policymakers are working without a playbook. Many are already taking stunning actions, and the price tag of these bailout measures could top $10 trillion, analysts say.

How bad will the recession be?

As the world started to come to grips with the scale of the crisis in March, many leading economists offered grim forecasts. The outlook for growth in 2020, said International Monetary Fund head Kristalina Georgieva, is “a recession at least as bad as during the global financial crisis or worse.” Angel Gurria, secretary-general of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, said the virus could cut global growth in half, to 1.5 percent, or more, and called on governments to “throw everything we got at it.”

Many governments are effectively freezing social and economic activity in all or parts of their countries to contain the outbreak, shuttering nonessential businesses and ordering residents to stay at home for weeks or months. By late March, billions of people worldwide were under some type of lockdown. The hope is that economies can power down without causing extreme disruptions, such as widespread business failures or joblessness, and then quickly get back up to speed after the disease abates.

$10 trillion
Potential price tag of global bailout


Some countries and industries will be hit harder than others during the slowdown. The travel and tourism sectors, for instance, are facing their biggest crisis in history. Most of the world’s airlines are teetering on the verge of bankruptcy. Meanwhile, the dramatic drop in energy demand will cut deeply into the revenues of petrostates such as Iran, Russia, and Saudi Arabia.

Here is what some of the world’s largest economies are doing to respond to the coronavirus downturn.

China

The world’s second-largest economy was stirring back to life in March after suffering a withering blow from the coronavirus, which originated in the city of Wuhan in Hubei Province in late 2019. Several weeks of government-imposed lockdowns on dozens of cities led to double-digit percentage declines in factory output, retail sales, construction, and other economic activity. Urban unemployment reached a record high of more than 6 percent in February. Some researchers say China’s growth could slow to below 3 percent this year as global demand for its exports dips.

China’s leadership seems less inclined to spearhead a global economic recovery this time than it did following the 2008 financial crisis, when it spent liberally on a stimulus package of more than a half trillion dollars. In the years since, China has roughly doubled its government debt—to about 60 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)—and many analysts think it cannot afford to spend so aggressively again.

So far, China’s central bank has taken relatively modest actions, reducing reserve requirements for banks, which will allow them to loan an additional $80 billion to struggling businesses, and indicating that it will cut interest rates in the months ahead. 

Germany

The German economy is expected to shrink for the first time since 2009, anywhere from 3 to 10 percent this year depending on the length of the country’s lockdown. In March, nearly a half million German companies applied to have their employees join a short-term government work program intended to prevent mass layoffs.

To counter the economic fallout from the coronavirus, Berlin is taking bold actions, abandoning its steadfast commitment to balanced budgets, known as schwarze Null or “black zero.” It is allocating at least 350 billion euros—or about 10 percent of its GDP—to prop up the eurozone’s largest economy. Funds will be spent to bail out struggling businesses, including by making unlimited loans and potentially taking equity stakes.

We’re doing whatever is necessary.Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany

“We’re doing whatever is necessary,” said Chancellor Angela Merkel, who also led the country through the 2008 crisis. “And we won’t be asking every day what it means for our deficit.” Officials note that Germany is poised to spend aggressively because the government has kept its finances in check in recent years, reducing its debt-to-GDP ratio from more than 80 percent in 2010 to below 60 percent today. 

Japan

Economists predict that Japan’s export-driven economy will shrink by around 3 percent this year, which would be its worst performance since 2008. The deep impact from the pandemic comes on the heels of an economic slowdown from a sales tax hike last fall. The virus has also forced the government to postpone the Summer Olympics until next year.

Like some of its peers in the West, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government is reportedly planning an unprecedented spending package to help the country through one of its most challenging periods in recent memory. Stimulus measures could include cash payments to citizens, interest-free loans, and delayed tax payments, among other things.

Amid market volatility in mid-March, Japan’s central bank announced it would double to more than $100 billion its annual purchase of stocks, bonds, and other assets. However, some critics say the move demonstrated the Bank of Japan’s limited options after having kept interest rates next to zero for years.

United Kingdom


The pandemic is paralyzing the UK economy just as the country’s leaders are negotiating its post-Brexit relationship with the European Union. Prior to the outbreak, there were already concerns about a recession from a so-called hard Brexit. Economists now say that the coronavirus pandemic could take a 5 percent slice out of the economy in 2020.

The government is prepared to make interventions that would be “unprecedented in the history of the British state” to support the economy, finance minister Rishi Sunak said in early March. Among its emergency measures, the Treasury has pledged to pay 80 percent of workers’ salaries for several months to keep companies from resorting to huge layoffs; deferred tax payments; increased unemployment benefits; and made loan guarantees.
15% of GDP
Potential UK fiscal commitments
Source:
Wall Street Journal.

Additionally, the Bank of England has lowered its benchmark interest rate to 0.5 percent, a record low, and loosened capital requirements for banks. All told, the rescue efforts could see Britain spend upward of 400 billion pounds, or about 15 percent of GDP. 

United States

In a sign of the staggering toll the virus was already taking on the U.S. economy, roughly 10 million Americans filed for unemployment the last two weeks of March. The worst single week of filings prior to that was 695,000 in 1982. Some analysts suggest that the U.S. unemployment rate could reach as high as 40 percent in the second quarter of the year, significantly higher than its peak of 25 percent during the Great Depression.

While Washington has been criticized for mismanaging the public health response to the pandemic, it’s also been credited with moving decisively to stabilize financial markets. In March, the Federal Reserve indicated that it will do anything within its power to support the economy and provide liquidity. Among the Fed’s historic actions have been: cutting interest rates close to zero, reducing bank reserve requirements to zero, rapidly purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars in Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, buying corporate debt, and extending emergency credit to nonbanks.

Meanwhile, on the fiscal side, lawmakers passed a $2 trillion stimulus package that some analysts have characterized as a bridge loan to get the U.S. economy through the crisis. It includes direct payments of up to $1200 to individuals, hundreds of billions of dollars in loans and grants to businesses, increases to unemployment benefits, and support for hospitals and health-care providers. “In effect, this is a wartime level of investment into our nation,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. 

Multilateral Institutions

European Central Bank (ECB). Through its Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program, the ECB is set to buy up to 750 billion euros in additional bonds this year to help its members amid the downturn. And further action could be coming, as ECB President Christine Lagarde promised there will be “no limits” on the bank’s defense of the eurozone.

International Monetary Fund. The IMF announced it will set aside $50 billion to lend to member countries that are facing acute financial crises as a result of the coronavirus, with preference given to emerging economies.

World Bank Group. The World Bank said it will respond to the pandemic with up to $12 billion in financing for hard-hit developing countries.

Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.

We must invent a new world order now to stop Covid-19



WILSON DIZARD

27 MAR 2020

Human civilisation will need to invent a new understanding of what it means to be human.

Coronavirus has turned the global market into the global hospital. It has presented every single human being with the same threat at the same time, a virus for which there is no cure or vaccine.

It is hunting you and it is hunting me. As its prey, the best defence we have is to remain indoors as much as possible. Going outside carries a risk to ourselves and thousands of others. The economists of the past, as well as the political theorists, never imagined a world where standing less than two metres apart from another person could be so deadly. And while past philosophies imagined a shared human “world soul”, never before has our impact on it as individuals been so clear. Today, we all share the same blood, and it’s Covid-19’s hunting ground.

But humans have been prey before, for most of our history on Earth. Our ancestors escaped the jaws of predators that sought to consume us, and they escaped by sticking together.

“This will end with humanity victorious over yet another virus, there’s no question about that. The question is how much and how fast we will take the measures necessary to minimise the damage that this thing can do. In time, we will have therapeutics, we will have vaccines, we’re in a race against that,’’ Dr Bruce Aylward, a senior adviser to the director-general of the World Health Organization, told Time Magazine.

“And it’s going to take great cooperation and patience from the general population to play their part because at the end of the day it’s going to be the general population that stops this thing and slows it down enough to get it under control.”

That will not be an easy or cheap process, and if we want to restart the global economy, we need to have a global response. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres put it in stark terms on Tuesday, pleading with rich nations for help.

"We are only as strong as the weakest health system in our interconnected world," Guterres wrote.

"We must create the conditions and mobilise the resources necessary to ensure that developing countries have equal opportunities to respond to this crisis ... anything short of this commitment would lead to a pandemic of apocalyptic proportions affecting us all."

Guterres said trillions of dollars would be necessary to shore up not just the economies, but even the basic food supply, for developing countries. He recommended removing tariffs and impediments to trade. The purpose of international trade, in theory, at least, is to build a web of shared interest around the world that makes catastrophic warfare less likely, and racism less prevalent. Those values will face an enormous test, and will either survive or disintegrate under the march of a new, merciless brand of corona-branded authoritarianism. That is especially true if we cannot distribute Covid-19 vaccines to the billions of people who will need them, billions of total strangers.

Today, so many strangers ask so much of us, and we ask so much of strangers. Together, we stand at a precipice in human history. We can either come out on the other side of it a wiser, more caring, knowledgeable species, or we can enter a period of prolonged, indefinite decline into a dark age full of shuttered schools, bigger prisons and hungrier children.

We can come out of the Silicon Age Collapse with a global civilisation that respects the rights of everyone, or we can revert to a world of rapacious empires that respects the rights of no one. If the global economy is ever going to restart, it will need something approaching a global government to restart it. It’s up to us whether it is a world we want to live in.

How did we get here?

A pandemic like Covid-19 was inevitable, with millions of people moving across the planet as never before in human history. We should think of Covid-19 as a natural disaster the entire planet is facing all at once. The establishment of a new diplomatic order, arranged around a new kind of political philosophy, is necessary to both sustain ourselves during the pandemic and rebuild after it passes.

The world will need to invent new international public health systems that can reduce the risk of another pandemic, and help save lives in the current one. The sooner we as a species start thinking about how to do this, the better. To do it successfully, we will have to invent a new philosophy of what it means to be human. Just as in the aftermaths of previous incidents of mass death, social disarray and economic collapse, as in the wake of World War II, human civilisation will need to invent a new understanding of what it means to be human.

Worldwide, tens or even hundreds of millions of people could die, in multiple waves of pandemic outbreak, over the next 18 months, or longer. No one knows. Economic activity will only crawl back into place slowly, and unevenly, as supply chains of the global market fray indefinitely due to an unwelcome invader. In 2020, it’s coronavirus. In the 12th Century BCE, it was the Bronze Age Collapse.

Lessons from 3,000 years ago can help us figure out how to make it through the end of the world as we know it. At the height of the Bronze Age, which lasted from from around 3,000 BCE to 1,200 BCE, highly complex and centralised civilizations developed across the Eastern Mediterranean and Aegean. But over a period of just 100 years, a series of calamities toppled them one by one. It would take hundreds of years before the region regained knowledge of writing.

Then, a series of disasters, including a widespread drought in the Mediterranean basin and the subsequent arrivals of marauding and mysterious “Sea People”. Records of where the sea people came from are scarce, but they may have come from the Western Mediterranean, and turned to raiding and plunder amid a widespread drought that also hit the complex Bronze Age civilisations as well.

One Los Angeles-based historian, Chris Mitchell, says that coronavirus might not be enough on its own to doom global civilisation, but it will make it more vulnerable to other shocks. He’s one of more than 100 million Americans living under lockdown in the US.

“The High Bronze Age societies were highly centralised, perhaps more than any others until well after Jesus. The king or the pharaoh's bureaucrats would determine what, where and when you were to plant stuff. That is why the collapse makes me so anxious about our modern society.

So much of how we manage to survive depends on governing authorities and their underlings working in semi-perfect concert with a million other factors, to make sure cities are fed,” Mitchell said. “If you disrupt that, over a long period of time, and from a number of different angels, we have a collapse.”

We can say we are right now living through the Silicon Age Collapse. Silicon, the primary component in microchips, was not able to save us from this crisis. In the same way, Bronze-based technology could not save the ancients from systems-collapse. The Minoans, for instance, abandoned writing altogether. With life itself becoming harder, there was little reason to learn or teach the skill.

Mitchell said that complex civilisation restarted itself around models that grew out of the post-Bronze Age period. City states remained, but empires fell. New empires emerged, hundreds of years later, out of those city states. Athens, Sparta and Ionia would go on to rediscover complexity, trade and the exchange of ideas, some borrowing the Phoenician alphabet as their own.

So what’s in store for us, after the Silicon Age Collapse? It’s impossible to know.

In the immediate term, we should remember that we share the same blood. That means that an infection anywhere is a threat to humanity everywhere. In order to rebuild the global economy, we may need to institute a form of global government that bolsters the public health systems of hard-hit places, including developing countries and developed countries. Americans may soon need to rely on medical aid from overseas, although they have no idea how to ask for it.

An international public health system will need to have its own charter of rights for the infected and the quarantined, who may come from different countries but share the same human vulnerability to Covid-19. Capitals need to prepare for the unprecedented paradigm shift in diplomacy and rearrangement of borders, travel, trade and commerce.

To do it right, we should not treat any human, anywhere, as expendable. Like every predator that has ever hunted us, that’s what the virus wants.
Source: TRT World
Advised to stay home: but what about the homeless in times of coronavirus?

23 MAR 2020

What’s behind the rise of homelessness in the UK?

With no roof over their heads and no food to sustain themselves, the homeless around the world are one of the most vulnerable groups in light of the global pandemic.

As cities grow, so does the homeless population. Living on the streets, relying on donations, millions of homeless people have no defence against the coronavirus (Covid-19), which has already claimed at least 15,000 lives around the world. With several cities being placed under lockdown to safeguard the healthcare infrastructure from crashing, tens of thousands of homeless people seem to be completely ignored and treated as a low priority group.

Is there a way for homeless people to self-isolate and find food?

About 150 million people are homeless worldwide, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In the US alone, about 554,000 people are living on the streets or in shelters, while the UK’s homeless population is pegged at 307,000. Other European countries share a similarly high rate of homelessness including Germany with 650,000 people and France with 141,500.

In light of self-quarantine and strict advisories passed by various governments, asking their citizens to stay indoors, food banks and soup kitchens are unable to distribute. As a result, hundreds of homeless are suffering from malnutrition, desperately relying on non-profit donations and charities to get by.

For instance, food banks in the UK provide food to an estimated 14 million in poverty. Many of these food banks work with volunteers, mostly retired people who are now at home self-isolating. With their fragile immune systems, the homeless are in need of more nutrition than ever but with food banks, soup kitchens are closed, there is nowhere to turn to.

Due to the coronavirus crisis we have had to make some changes to our foodbank centres.

Rannoch food bank is now closed for the foreseeable future

Pilton foodbank is now based in Fet Lor Youth Centre, 122 Crewe Road South EH4 2NY

Please spread the wordhttps://t.co/PLg8Aq2MkF— EdinburghFoodProject (@EdinFoodProject) March 21, 2020

Only last Saturday, the London Mayor announced the city will house around 11,000 rough sleepers at two hotels to self-isolate amid the coronavirus outbreak. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who is accused of not taking precautions against the coronavirus sooner, announced £3.2m of funding to help get people off the streets, offering accommodation for up to 6,000 which is still short.
A homeless British holds a sign reading "What about us Boris - were we gunna isolate? Help!", criticizing PM Boris Johnson’s neglect of the country’s vulnerable members. (ISABEL INFANTES / AFP)

As official food distribution to the homeless is on hold, individuals are taking charge. Volunteers in the US, UK, France and Germany are looking for ways to help the homeless, delivering them daily food and even hygiene products hoping to prevent any coronavirus outbreak among the most vulnerable. While some are donating hand sanitisers and portable sinks that are installed in places where the homeless set their tents most densely, some deliver food to the homeless as much as they can. However, even this is not an easy task. Due to panic buying, the shelves of the supermarkets are almost cleared. Volunteers and charities report that they cannot find enough food to distribute the homeless. And with the economy flailing in Europe and the US, it seems like more and more people will be out of jobs and in need of food relief in the near future.



New Yorkers without a home to self isolate. @NYGovCuomo @NYCMayor what’s the plan for these folks? We’re forgetting the homeless. They need food, portable restrooms, and temporary shelter. #Covid_19 #CovidNYC pic.twitter.com/gpnYeyV7Zd— Matt Dishman (@MattDishman1) March 21, 2020

Food might be scarce for the homeless but so is shelter. Although self-isolation is the best way to stop the spread of the coronavirus, the homeless can hardly follow this advice. On March, 20, French police issued fines to hundreds of homeless in Paris, Lyon and Bayonne for violating lockdown rules. “We request that clear instructions be given… so that these sanctions cease immediately,” Florent Gueguen, head of the France's Federation of Solidarity (FAS) told AFP. French authorities say several dozen homeless people have been infected with the coronavirus. In order to stop the spread, the government released a statement informing that hotel rooms will be prepared to accommodate the homeless and various centres will work as temporary shelters for the homeless. Although 3,000 beds will be ready for the homeless in the upcoming days, it is hardly enough for France’s homeless population of roughly 150,000 people.

On the other hand, crowded homeless shelters pose more danger than relief. Homeless people in the US refuse to go to shelters, claiming that they will have no chance to avoid contracting the virus in overcrowded and unsanitary shelters. Residents of California’s shelters, report empty soap dispensers, a lack of toilet paper, no hot water and broken sinks. In a statement, Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, shared some worrisome data and claimed that more than 60,000 homeless people could become ill with the coronavirus in California over the next two months. Given the fact that the homeless who are lucky enough to find shelter are living in overcrowded rooms, Newsom’s estimation seems highly optimistic.

Things are far worse for Los Angeles with a high population of homeless people. Gatherings have been banned over the outbreak however, homeless people still remain on the street, often packed in tent camps with no chance for self-isolation. According to the Los Angeles Times, the local government issued a law which required the homeless to take down these tents during the day, further exposing them to the risk of contracting and spreading coronavirus.



Is this shelter safe to live in? #Homeless #covid19 @FOX5Atlanta @wsbtv pic.twitter.com/euaMSrGomn— Georgia Covid19 Updates (@covid19ga) March 20, 2020

People living on the street are the most vulnerable as it is easy for them to contract the novel virus. Sleeping out in the open, they can easily fall ill and have no means of getting medical treatment. Furthermore, life on the street takes its toll on people. Doctors highlight the fact that the homeless have very weak immune systems and even the young cannot even overcome mild diseases let alone coronavirus.

A 2016 study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that people living in poorer neighborhoods during flu seasons were hospitalised in connection with the illness at a higher rate than residents of more affluent communities. A study that observed a hospital in Washington, US, found that 32 percent of those hospitalised for respiratory diseases were homeless, compared with 6.5 percent of all patients hospitalised. Even without a pandemic, 400 rough sleepers in San Francisco, US, have died on the streets in the last three years. With the coronavirus pandemic spreading, the homeless once again face the ignorance of the governments.

With no health insurance, it is unlikely the homeless will be able to get the medical care they need if they fall sick. Although the US has guaranteed free coronavirus tests for those who do not have health insurance, the line for testing is so long that it will take ages for the homeless to access testing. Although some states are offering testing to the homeless exhibiting symptoms, and quarantine, there is no official statement as to how they will be treated.


[NOTE: The article came from TRT World’s Eyes on Discrimination (EOD) Centre, which monitors and reports on offences, hate crimes and discrimination on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, national origin and religion, or other related social categories.]
Source: TRTWorld and agencies


To defeat Covid-19, we need a new cosmopolitanism


EVAN PIERCE

The virus presents us with an unprecedented opportunity, and obligation, to reconfigure how we live. The joke will be on us for not taking it.

Individuals can be remarkably resourceful. In his 2008 novel, ‘City of Thieves’, David Benioff’s protagonist is tasked with finding a dozen eggs for a leading communist party apparatchik amidst the hellish four-year Siege of Leningrad, during which much of the city’s population perishes from hunger. Though he finds the eggs, he nearly dies in the attempt.

One needn’t, of course, turn to literature for extraordinary acts of self-preservation: Covid-19 is giving us thousands of examples by the day.

A friend in Ireland who runs a small coffee-roasting company is building a second polytunnel to double his vegetable production. Though cafés can no longer buy his beans, the take-outs still need his lettuce, cabbages, and carrots. Sensing danger, a friend in Manhattan flew his mother out from Mumbai in late February and took her upstate in late March. From their cabin on the river, he, his partner, brother, and sister-in-law will work remotely until the mayhem recedes.

Everywhere you look, individuals are adapting faster than organisations at adjusting to life under Covid-19. Socially, economically, and even emotionally. The world over, estranged parents are bonding with children over Facetime, while exes thought forever lost send each other sweet pangolin emojis. After a decade labouring away in lecture halls and library stacks, my sister defended her PhD dissertation via Skype.


Though telecommuters are a privileged minority growing scarcer by the day, governments have a thing or two to learn from their most mobile citizens. To cope in the post-Covid landscape, states must mimic the privileged few. What they need is a new cosmopolitanism.


Citizen of everywhere

The new cosmopolitanism is agile, creative, and quick to respond to challenges. It relies on friends in far places and forges new ones close at hand. It gives where it can—noblesse, forget not, oblige—but is never ashamed to ask for help. The world’s two greatest powers should be the first to admit how much they need it.

Balancing a long memory with a healthy appreciation of the absurd, the new cosmopolitanism must also let bygones be bygones.

In foreign affairs, this means cancelling debt, removing all healthcare-related sanctions against Iran, and waiving patents on breakthrough medicines. Domestically, it means moving the homeless into hotels, turning dorms into hospitals, and enacting a 90-day rent moratorium across communities torn asunder by unemployment.

Are these impossible demands? Two months ago, undoubtedly. Today? They may be enough to just break even.

War, as Randolph Bourne wrote, is the health of the state. But it’s also a litmus test of existential fitness. Now that we’re up against a biological time bomb without borders, our leaders must see for the forest for the trees.


Admitting the terrible truth that ‘nobody’s free until everybody’s free,’ countries must send much needed material to those in need, such as Turkey has done for Italy and Spain, China is doing for the United States, and everyone left standing will soon have to do for India.

Apart from vastly ramping up production efforts, medical breakthroughs must also become a public international good.

Just as the Americans built the atomic bomb with German and Italian brainpower, attempts to defeat Covid-19 must be shared. For starters, any drug’s patent protection should be made contingent on its global accessibility at purchasing power parity before the US Food and Drug Administration or World Trade Organization gives it the green light.

After all, for every butterfly flapping its wings in the Amazon, there is an overworked Polish or Pakistani epidemiologist laboring in a Swiss or German lab to save Manila and Minneapolis from perdition. If we are to make it to the Tokyo Summer Olympics with any semblance of civilization intact, the fruits of their labor must be shared.

A new provincialism

While the rest of us pontificate in our pyjamas, we must also prepare for the second salvo of our collective salvation: the dawn of a new provincialism. For the fact is this: life as we knew it before March 2020 is over.

Even when the virus recedes, gone are the days of boundless international travel and hyper-globalised supply chains, when everything from underwear to toothpaste had to travel 12,000km to reach your bathroom cabinet. Though knowledge and communications remain as global than ever, they will likely be the exception. In most other regards, we’ll have to adapt to the new provincialism.

To begin with, this means making do with less. Less travel, less consumption, less variety, and less disposable income. Down, says the optimist, with the tyranny of choice!


In addition to outright restrictions, we are also on the verge of a vast decentralisation. From entertainment to administration, many facets of life will be provincialised. The EU, for example, will likely see many of its functions devolved to the nation-state, while larger countries revert to a variety of regional solutions. The US National Football League, thank Covid, will no longer play in London each autumn.

As sites of unbridled contagion, the world’s megacities will also see their stock fall, while that of provincial cities rises: first in healthcare and rapid response infrastructure, but later in commerce, entertainment, food processing, research and development, education, and even (renewable) energy. Motors of greater sustainability, mid-sized cities will inch closer to their place in the sun, the shine of Bogotá, Bangkok, and Mumbai gradually offset by Bucaramanga, Bandung, and Bahawalpur.

The empire of empathy


What could possibly hold the crumbling edifice of our ‘international community’ together? As prisons throw open their doors, Americans stockpile weapons, unemployment reaches all-time highs, and millions of bickering couples remain confined to small apartments, a Hobbesian free-for-all seems more likely than spontaneous outpourings of brotherly love.

But given the stakes — the viability of social life on earth —we should probably give it a shot. How to keep the goddess Kali at bay? By expanding the empire of empathy.

On an individual level, this means attempting to correct our own faults — lest our roommates suffocate us in our sleep — and forgiving those of others. At the international political level, it means replacing geopolitical posturing with coordinated attempts to stop the virus. For at least the next year, diplomacy must be elevated to streamlining global public health initiatives.

For the fact is this. Though rivalries and fisticuffs are so much fun, we must set them aside for a time to serve a higher master. In addition to laying down our own flags, be they personal, professional, political, or proprietary, we must fight under a new banner, extending, against all odds, the empire of empathy as far as her natural boundaries will go.

Should we fail to, the days to come may prove more solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and long than even the month of March.

AUTHOR

Evan Pierce is an Istanbul-based journalist and researcher who writes widely about economic developments in emerging markets. Prior to Turkey, he worked in Beirut, Bogotá, and Hong Kong, where he covered a variety of social, political, and economic issues.


[NOTE: The article came from TRT World’s Eyes on Discrimination (EOD) Centre, which monitors and reports on offences, hate crimes and discrimination on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, national origin and religion, or other related social categories.]
Source: TRTWorld and agencies