Saturday, December 03, 2022

Opinion 

We’re America’s most loyal ally in Syria. 

Don’t forget us.

Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces, speaks at a Nov. 26 news conference in Hasakah, Syria. (Baderkhan Ahmad/AP)

Mazloum Abdi is the commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces.


In 2014, the world learned about my hometown, Kobane, and my people, the Syrian Kurds, when we dealt the Islamic State its first major defeat in partnership with the United States and the Global Coalition. The alliances we forged there led to the end of the ISIS caliphate in 2019.

Today, Kobane is again under threat — and all the gains of those partnerships are also in danger.


This time, the threat comes not from Islamic State terror, but from a U.S. ally and a member of NATO. For more than a week, the government of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has rained bombs down on our cities, killing civilians, destroying critical civilian infrastructure and targeting the Syrian Democratic Forces working to keep ISIS down.


For the people of our region, the military defeat of the Islamic State was never our only goal. At every step of our fight against the terror group on the battlefield, we took steps to crush the ideology behind it by building a system based on inclusion, pluralism and equality. In Raqqa, for example, where Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi once ruled over ISIS territory, Syrian women are now prominent leaders.


In 2015, we established the Syrian Democratic Forces, a coalition of Kurds, Arabs and Assyrians committed to defeating the Islamic State. In every city we liberated, our people built local administrations that, for the first time in Syria, represented all ethnicities and religions and gave women equal power.


We’ve been criticized at times for falling short of the West’s democratic standards. Our system is not perfect: We had to build it while at war for our existence and under a crushing economic blockade.


But in terms of the quality of governance and security we have been able to provide, we have outdone every other authority in Syria — and none of it would have been possible without the victory at Kobane and the international support for our resistance that it brought.




Now the Turkish offensive against our region is putting all of that under renewed threat.


One strike in the border city of Derik, home to Kurds, Yazidis and Christians, killed more than 10 civilians. Another targeted the base near the city of Hasakah, where I work with the United States to plan operations against ISIS, striking just hundreds of meters from U.S. forces. I believe it was an attempt on my life: Turkey has assassinated several of my colleagues in the SDF and our administration this year.

Adding to the terror and chaos of the bombing campaign, Erdogan continues to threaten a ground invasion of our territory. We know what the consequences of such an attack will be, because Turkey has done this twice before.

The Turkish invasions of Afrin in 2018 and Ras al-Ayn and Tal Abyad in 2019 displaced hundreds of thousands of people and disrupted the global fight against the Islamic State. After years of Turkish rule, these regions are now infamous for chaos, instability, infighting and the presence of extremists.


Where our administration once protected ethnic coexistence, religious freedom and women’s rights, Turkish forces and Turkey-backed militias commit unspeakable abuses against ethnic and religious minorities and women with impunity.


Under our administration, Afrin was the only part of northwest Syria untouched by radical Islamists. Since the area has come under Turkish control, groups affiliated with al-Qaeda operate freely on its territory. This summer, a U.S. drone strike killed Maher al-Agal, a top ISIS leader, there.


Turkey is not threatening our people and the security and stability for which we have sacrificed so much because of anything we have done. As a pretext for war, Erdogan has accused our forces of involvement in a deadly bombing in Istanbul. Let me make it clear: We deplore and condemn this act of terror, reject all accusations of involvement and again offer our condolences to the victims. We reiterate our call for an investigation and are ready to assist if one takes place.


We ask no one to fight for us. My people are still here because we have resisted alone countless times before. If we must, we will resist again. What we ask is for the world to be with us in a more difficult task: peace.

We believe that the roots of the conflicts that have brought so much pain and suffering to our region are political. There is no inherent hatred between Kurds and Turks: Turkish leaders have made the political choice to see Kurds as a security threat and deny us our fundamental democratic rights. In the past, Erdogan has negotiated with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) to end the armed conflict between the group and the Turkish state and resolve the Kurdish question by peaceful means.


When those talks were taking place, we lived in peace with our Turkish neighbors. If they were to restart, we would be able to do so again.


And when our region was under threat in 2019, the PKK offered, in this very newspaper, to sit down and seek a political solution. The call went unanswered, and Turkey invaded and occupied two of our cities just months later.


Had the international community stood firmly against a Turkish invasion and spoken up for peace, things may have gone very differently. Though no one can turn back time, we can learn from the tragedies of the past.


We declare that we are ready to play a helpful role in restarting these talks and reaching the peace that we seek. We call on the international community to immediately take concrete steps to prevent a Turkish invasion and to promote a political solution to the Kurdish conflict based on democracy, coexistence and equal rights. The existence of our people and the security of the region depend on it.




Syrian Kurds say they have stopped operations against IS

ASSOCIATED PRESS • November 26, 2022


BEIRUT — The commander of the main U.S.-backed Kurdish-led force in Syria said Saturday they have halted operations against the Islamic State group due to Turkish attacks on northern Syria over the past week.

Mazloum Abdi of the Syrian Democratic Forces told reporters that after nearly a week of Turkish airstrikes on northern Syria, Ankara is now preparing for a ground offensive. He said Turkey-backed opposition fighters are getting ready to take part in the operations.

Abdi added that Turkish strikes over the past week have caused severe damage to the region's infrastructure.

Abdi said Turkey is taking advantage of the deadly Nov. 13 bombing in Istanbul that Ankara blames on Kurdish groups. Kurdish organizations have denied any involvement in the Istanbul attack that killed six and wounded dozens.

Over the past week, Turkey launched a wave of airstrikes on suspected Kurdish rebels hiding in neighboring Syria and Iraq in retaliation for the Istanbul attack.

"The forces that work symbolically with the international coalition in the fight against Daesh are now targets for the Turkish state and therefore (military) operations have stopped," Abdi said, using an Arabic acronym of the Islamic State group. "Anti-Daesh operations have stopped."

His comments came hours after the U.S. military said two rockets targeted U.S.-led coalition forces at bases in the northeastern Syrian town of Shaddadeh resulting in no "injuries or damage to the base or coalition property."

The U.S. military statement said SDF fighters visited the site of the rocket's origin and found a third unfired rocket.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an opposition war monitor, in an early report about the Friday night rocket attack said "the area has been witnessing attacks by (IS) cells." It later said that Iran-backed militias "are responsible for yesterday's rocket fire."

"Attacks of this kind place coalition forces and the civilian populace at risk and undermine the hard-earned stability and security of Syria and the region," said Col. Joe Buccino, CENTCOM spokesman.

The SDF said in a statement before midnight Friday that as Turkish drones flew over the al-Hol camp that is home to tens of thousands of mostly wives, widows and children of IS fighters, some IS family members attacked security forces and managed to escape from the sprawling facility. The SDF did not say how many escaped but that they were later detained.

Kurdish authorities operate more than two dozen detention facilities scattered across northeastern Syria holding about 10,000 IS fighters. Among the detainees are some 2,000 foreigners whose home countries have refused to repatriate them, including about 800 Europeans.

Erdogan vows Syria ground invasion, Kurds prepare response


 


Turkish Strikes on US Kurd Allies Resonate in Ukraine War

December 03, 2022 
Associated Press


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan addresses parliament at the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, in Ankara, Oct. 1, 2022. The U.S. is trying talk Erdogan out of launching an offensive against American-allied Kurdish forces in neighboring Syria.

BUCHAREST, ROMANIA —

The administration of U.S. President Joe Biden is toughening its language toward NATO ally Turkey as it tries to talk Turkish President Recep Erdogan out of launching a bloody and destabilizing ground offensive against American-allied Kurdish forces in neighboring Syria.

Since November 20, after six people died in an Istanbul bombing a week before — which Turkey blamed, without evidence, on the United States and its Kurdish allies in Syria — Turkey has launched cross-border airstrikes, rockets and shells into U.S.- and Kurdish-patrolled areas of Syria, leaving Kurdish funeral corteges burying scores of dead.

Some criticized the initial muted U.S. response to the near-daily Turkish bombardment — a broad call for “de-escalation” — as a U.S. green light for more. With Erdogan not backing down on his threat to escalate, the U.S. began speaking more forcefully.


US Pleas for Calm Fail to Resonate Along Turkish-Syrian Border


U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin called his Turkish counterpart on Wednesday to express “strong opposition” to Turkey launching a new military operation in northern Syria.

And National Security Council spokesman John Kirby on Friday made one of the administration's first specific mentions of the impact of the Turkish strikes on the Kurdish militia, known as the Syrian Democratic Forces, that works with the U.S. against Islamic State militants bottled up in northern Syria.

Wide repercussions

How successfully the U.S. manages Erdogan’s threat to send troops in against America's Kurdish partners over coming weeks will affect global security concerns far from that isolated corner of Syria.

That's especially true for the Ukraine conflict. The Biden administration is eager for Erdogan's cooperation with other NATO partners in countering Russia, particularly when it comes to persuading Turkey to drop its objections to Finland and Sweden joining NATO.

But giving Turkey free reign in attacks on the Syrian Kurds in hopes of securing Erdogan's cooperation within NATO would have big security implications of its own.

U.S. forces on Friday stopped joint military patrols with the Kurdish forces in northern Syria to counter Islamic State extremists, as the Kurds concentrate on defending themselves from the Turkish air and artillery attacks and a possible ground invasion.

Since 2015, the Syrian Kurdish forces have worked with the few hundred forces the U.S. has on the ground there, winning back territory from the Islamic State and then detaining thousands of Islamic State fighters and their families and battling remnant Islamic State fighters. On Saturday, the U.S. and Kurds resumed limited patrols at one of the detention camps.

“ISIS is the forgotten story for the world and the United States, because of the focus on Ukraine,” said Omer Taspinar, an expert on Turkey and European security at the Brookings Institution and the National War College. ISIS is one widely used acronym for the Islamic State.



“Tragically, what would revive Western support for the Kurds ... would be another ISIS terrorist attack, God forbid, in Europe or in the United States that will remind people that we actually have not defeated ISIS,” Taspinar said.

Turkey says the Syrian Kurds are allied to a nearly four-decade PKK Kurdish insurgency in southeast Turkey that has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people on both sides. The United States' Syrian Kurdish allies deny any attacks in Turkey.

U.S. Central Command, and many in Congress, praise the Syrian Kurds as brave comrades in arms. In July, Central Command angered Turkey by tweeting condolences for a Syrian Kurdish deputy commander and two other female fighters killed by a drone strike blamed on Turkey.

In 2019, a public outcry by his fellow Republicans and many others killed a plan by President Donald Trump, which he announced after a call with Erdogan, to clear U.S. troops out of the way of an expected Turkish attack on the Kurdish allies in Syria.

Then-presidential contender and now U.S. President Joe Biden was among those expressing outrage.

“The Kurds were integral in helping us defeat ISIS — and too many lost their lives. Now, President Trump has abandoned them. It’s shameful,” Biden tweeted at the time.

The measured U.S. response now — even after some Turkish strikes hit near sites that host U.S. forces — reflects the significant strategic role that Turkey, as a NATO member, plays in the alliance's efforts to counter Russia in Europe. The State Department and USAID did not immediately answer questions about whether the Turkish strikes had hindered aid workers and operations that partner with the United States.


Trying to exert leverage


Turkey, with strong ties to both Russia and the U.S., has contributed to its NATO allies' efforts against Russia in key ways during the Ukraine conflict. That includes supplying armed drones to Ukraine, and helping mediate between Russia and the United States and others.

But Turkey is also seeking to exert leverage within the alliance by blocking Finland and Sweden from joining NATO. Turkey is demanding that Sweden surrender Kurdish exiles that it says are affiliated with the PKK Kurdish insurgents.

Turkey’s state-run news agency reported that Sweden extradited a member of the PKK, and he was arrested Saturday upon arrival in Istanbul.

Turkey is one of only two of the 30 NATO members not to have signed off yet on the Nordic countries' NATO memberships. Hungary, the other, is expected to do so.

At a gathering of NATO foreign ministers in Bucharest, Romania, this past week, NATO diplomats refrained from publicly confronting Turkey, avoiding giving offense that might further set back the cause of Finland's and Sweden's NATO membership.

Turkey's foreign minister made clear to his European counterparts that Turkey had yet to be appeased when it came to Finland or Sweden hosting Kurdish exiles there.

“We reminded that in the end, it’s the Turkish people and the Turkish parliament that need to be convinced,” Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told reporters on the sidelines.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is expected to talk Thursday with Finland's and Sweden's foreign ministers on dealing with Turkey's objections to their NATO accession.

Experts say the Biden administration has plenty of leverage to wield privately in urging Erdogan to relent in the threatened escalated attack on Syrian Kurds. That includes U.S. F-16 fighter sales that Turkey wants but have been opposed by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez and others in Congress.

There's a third big security risk in the U.S. handling of Turkey's invasion threat, along with the possible impact on the Ukraine conflict and on efforts to contain the Islamic State.



That's the risk to Kurds, a stateless people and frequent U.S. ally often abandoned by the U.S. and the West in past conflicts over the past century.

If the U.S. stands by while Turkey escalates attacks on the Syrian Kurds who were instrumental in quelling the Islamic State, “especially in the aftermath of Afghanistan, what message are we sending to the Middle East?" asked Henri J. Barkey, an expert on Kurds and Turkey at the Council on Foreign Relations and at Lehigh University.

“And to all allies in general?" Barkey asked.

An ethnic group of millions at the intersection of Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria, Kurds lost out on a state of their own as the U.S. and other powers carved up the remnants of the Turkish Ottoman Empire after World War I.

Saddam Hussein and other regional leaders used poison gas, airstrikes and other tools of mass slaughter over the decades to suppress the Kurds. As under U.S. President George H.W. Bush in 1991 after the Gulf War, the U.S. at times encouraged popular uprisings but stood by as Kurds died in the resulting massacres.

On November 28, hundreds of Syrian Kurds gathered for the victims of one of the Turkish airstrikes — five guards killed securing the al-Hol camp, which holds thousands of family members of Islamic State fighters.

Relatives of one of the Kurdish guards, Saifuddin Mohammed, placed his photo on his grave.

“Of course, we are proud,” said his brother, Abbas Mohammed. “He defended his land and his honor against the Turkish invading forces.”







Russia calls on Turkey to show ‘restraint’ in Syria

Russian negotiator Alexander Lavrentyev attends a session of the peace talks on Syria in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan April 26, 2019. (File photo: Reuters)

AFP, Astana
Published: 22 November ,2022: 

Russia on Tuesday said it hoped Turkey would exercise “restraint” and refrain from “any excessive use of force” in Syria, where Ankara has carried out air strikes and is threatening to launch a ground offensive against Kurdish fighters.

“We hope to convince our Turkish colleagues to refrain from resorting to excessive use of force on Syrian territory” to “avoid the escalation of tensions,” Alexander Lavrentyev, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s special envoy on Syria, told reporters in Astana.

For the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.


Turkey on Sunday launched a series of air raids targeting bases of outlawed Kurdish militants across northern Syria and Iraq.

At least 37 people were killed in the strikes, according to a report by Britain-based monitoring group the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

“Russia has for months ... done everything possible to prevent any large-scale ground operation,” Lavrentyev said in the Kazakh capital, which is hosting a tripartite meeting between Russia, Turkey and Iran on Syria.

The three countries are major players in the war in Syria, which has claimed nearly half a million lives since 2011.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been threatening to launch a new military operation in northern Syria since May.

“We will make those who disturb us on our territory pay,” he said on Monday, adding that consultations were ongoing “to decide the level of force that should be used by our ground forces.”

The Turkish air offensive, codenamed Operation Claw-Sword, came a week after a blast in central Istanbul killed six people and wounded 81, an attack Turkey has blamed on the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

The PKK has waged a bloody insurgency in Turkey for decades and is designated a terror group by Ankara and its Western allies. But it has denied involvement in the Istanbul explosion.

Read more:

Iraq condemns Iranian, Turkish attacks on Kurdistan region

Thousands in north Syria attend funerals of Turkish raids victims

Rocket strikes from Syria kill at least two people in Turkey, governor says

Another Major Turkish Military Ground Incursion Very Likely Amid Rising Tensions in Syria Experts Say

November 22, 2022 
The aftermath of air strikes carried out by Turkish warplanes in Derik countryside, Syria November 21, 2022.

The uptick in tension between Turkey and Syrian Kurdish militants could result in a new ground operation by Ankara, experts said, as President Recep Tayyip Erdogan vows more comprehensive military action amid the rising nationalist sentiment in the country with elections six months away.

Two people were killed and 10 wounded Monday in a mortar attack by Syrian Kurdish militants in Gaziantep province in southern Turkey, officials said.

According to Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu, one of the projectiles hit a schoolyard in Gaziantep’s Karkamis town, killing a teacher and a child, and wounding 10 people, including a pregnant woman.

Officials said schools in the area will be closed for the remainder of the week.

The attack, which officials blame on the Syrian Kurdish militants, came after a series of airstrikes by the Turkish military in neighboring Iraq and Syria over the weekend.

Ankara says the airstrikes were in retaliation for last week’s deadly bombing in a busy area in Turkey’s biggest city, Istanbul.

Turkish authorities said Kurdish militants were behind the bombing, which killed six people and wounded dozens. The Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) and its Syrian branch, People’s Defense Units (YPG) denied involvement.

But Erdogan indicated that another ground operation in Syria is possible, saying Turkey’s military actions would not be limited to airstrikes.

The Turkish military have launched three ground incursions in the past in northern Syria, where it says Kurdish militants backed by the United States want to establish an independent Kurdish state.

Speaking to journalists during his return flight from Qatar, where he attended the opening ceremony of FIFA World Cup 2022, Erdogan said, “I always said we might come suddenly one night. We were not saying this in vain.”

“It is out of the question that this would be limited to air operations. Our Ministry of Defense and chief of staff will make a decision on how big a unit from our ground forces would be needed. We will engage in consultations and then will take our steps accordingly,“ he added.

US condemnation

The United States considers the PKK a terrorist organization while it backs its Syrian affiliate, Syrian Democratic Forces, led by YPG, in the fight against ISIS in Syria. U.S. support for the YPG has caused tension between the two allies.

"The United States expresses its sincere condolences for the loss of civilian life in Syria and Turkey. We urge de-escalation in Syria to protect civilian life and support the common goal of defeating ISIS. We continue to oppose any uncoordinated military action in Iraq that violates Iraq’s sovereignty," State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement.

The U.S. Embassy in Ankara condemned the recent attack in Gaziantep, calling it “violent and unjustified” in a statement shared on its official Twitter account, saying “The U.S. Mission joins the people of Türkiye in mourning the three innocent lives lost today in Karkamis.”



“We are NATO allies but unfortunately it was the United States that sent thousands of supplies and equipment, ammunition and weapons to the terror region in Syria,” Erdogan said after the Monday’s attack, noting that he raised the issue with U.S. President Joe Biden as he has with other U.S. presidents, including Trump and Obama.

Presidents Biden and Erdogan met on the sidelines of the G-20 Summit in Indonesia last week. According to the readout provided by the White House, Biden “expressed his deep condolences to President Erdogan and the people of Turkiye on the acts of violence in Istanbul and made clear we stand with our NATO Ally.”

Pentagon opposed to military action

Washington is known to have long opposed a major incursion by Turkey because it would disrupt the stability in the region.

The U.S. Department of Defense said on Monday that it “continues to oppose any military action that destabilizes the situation in Syria or violates Iraq’s sovereignty through military actions uncoordinated with the Iraqi government.”

“These actions threaten our shared goals, including to continue the fight against ISIS and make sure the group can never resurge,” Pentagon spokesperson Lt. Col. Phillip Ventura told VOA.



Domestic politics and election calculus


Turkish President Erdogan threatened a military incursion last summer, but those plans met with pushback from several actors in the region, including Russia, the United States and Iran.

The deadly bombing in Istanbul followed by the recent attack in Gaziantep, both blamed on Kurdish militants, increased the likelihood for the threat of military action to materialize.

Experts speaking to VOA believe it’s very likely, if not imminent, that Turkey will launch a new ground operation in Syria in the coming months.

Max Hoffman, the senior director of National Security and International Policy at Center for American Progress focusing on Turkey and Kurdish regions, says one of the reasons for the heightened tensions is Erdogan’s domestic political calculus as he faces an election battle in six months.

“We have history as a guide here. Three of the four major Turkish interventions in northern Syria have come in the run-up to Turkish elections. I don’t think that’s the only consideration but it’s certainly an important one. At some point it’s very likely that we’ll see a significant incursion,” he said.

James Jeffrey, former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Iraq, appears to agree. He told VOA there is a strong nationalist sentiment in Turkey right now, and Erdogan may see the military incursion as a way to increase his chances of winning the election.

Jeffrey served as the Secretary’s Special Representative for Syria Engagement and the Special Envoy to the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS until 2020 before he joined the Wilson Center in Washington.

Both experts predict that, in the event of a new military incursion by Turkey, the level and tone of the reaction from the United States would depend on where Turkish military would target in Syria.

“If it's a major Turkish attack on, for instance, Kobani, I think you'll see a stronger U.S. response,” Hoffman tells VOA.

Jeffrey says that although the United States would prefer there be no military incursion into Syria, “Washington is less concerned about possible military action in the northwest of Syria as opposed to the northeast.”

In the broader context of Turkey-U.S. relations, Ankara has yet to ratify Sweden and Finland’s NATO membership as the Russian invasion in Ukraine continues.

Turkey has requested to purchase F-16s and modernization kits from the United States and a possible sale would require the approval by U.S. Congress.

Max Hoffman says a major military operation by Turkey in Kobani would not help the overall picture, adding that “there are important voices on Capitol Hill particularly in the Senate whose positions would be affected by a possible Turkish incursion.”

This story originated in VOA’s Turkish service. VOA's Jeff Seldin contributed to this report.

Turkish warplanes attack US center for training Kurd fighters

TEHRAN, Nov. 22 (MNA) – Turkis warplanes delivered an airstrike at a US center for training Kurdish fighters of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Syria’s northeastern al-Hasakah governorate.

According to the Beirut-based Al Mayadeen television channel on Monday, US military instructors are working in this center.

No data about casualties are available.

Meanwhile, Turkish forces shelled the Amuda border area in the north of Syria’s al-Hasakah governorate, the Firat news agency reported on Monday.

According to the news agency, dozens of shells were fired at the positions of the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in the settlement Mer’it. Several civilians were killed or wounded.

Earlier in the day, Turkish warplanes attacked SDF positions in the settlements of Bahira and Tell Hamdun in this border sector, wounding two locals.

Also on Monday, Turkish fighter jets delivered strikes at Kurdish units near Ayn al-Arab (also known as Kobani) on the Euphrates eastern bank. Apart from that, artillery shelling was conducted at several Kurdish villages in the Al-Shehba neighborhood in western Aleppo.

On November 20, SDF attacked the Karkamysh border area in the Gaziantep province and the Onjupynar checkpoint near the city of Kilis, wounding eight people.

Earlier, Turkey’s defense ministry reported that 89 targets had been destroyed during the night air attack in northern Iraq and Syria on November 20. The ministry claimed that strikes had been delivered at places of deployment of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party and Syrian Kurdish units.

Turkish National Defense Minister Hulusi Akar announced on Monday, "Since the beginning of Operation Claw-Sword, 184 terrorists have been killed by means of aircraft and fire support from the ground. According to our estimates, this figure will grow. We will continue our struggle until the last terrorist is destroyed."

Experts say that Turkey’s cross-border operation in northern Iraq and Syria was a response to the November 13 terror attack in Istanbul, which left six people dead and more than 80 injured. The Turkish authorities placed the blame for it on the Kurdistan Workers’ Party and SDF’s People's Defense Units.

Moscow also called on Turkey to show restraint in light of the strikes on Syrian territory, tensions cannot be allowed to escalate.

"We will call on our Turkish colleagues to show certain restraint in order to prevent an escalation of tension, not only in the northern and northeastern regions of Syria, but throughout the entire territory," Russia's special presidential envoy for Syria Alexander Lavrentyev said at the beginning of the 19th round of talks on the Syrian settlement in Astana.

He said work with all interested parties should be continued, and an attempt should be made to find a peaceful solution to the Kurdish issue.

Lavrentyev said Turkey had not notified Russia in advance about the air operation in Syria and Iraq; the issue would be discussed during the meeting on Syria in Astana.

"We hope to convince our Turkish partners to refrain from using excessive force on Syrian territory," the Russian special envoy said.

ZZ/PR



South China Sea: as US eyes a Subic Bay return, was Chinese ‘coercion’ of Philippines the reason?

Story by Maria Siow • 

The Philippines could soon welcome back US troops to a South China Sea-facing port that Washington relinquished control of over 30 years ago

Observers say Beijing is sure to find such a move 'disconcerting', but Manila's heightened 'threat perceptions' of China may force its hand

The proposed return of US forces to a vast former military base in the Philippines after a three-decade-long absence looks set to heighten superpower rivalry in the South China Sea, as it weighs on Manila-Beijing relations.


Subic Bay was once home to the United States' largest naval base in Asia - almost the same size as the whole of Singapore - but disagreements over leasing costs in the post-Cold War era led to the withdrawal of American troops from the facility in 1992.

That could all be about to change, however, after reports emerged late last month that the site is likely being considered as a new location under the US-Philippines Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), which allows the US to build and operate facilities on Philippine military bases and rotate in troops for prolonged stays.


First signed in 2014, the EDCA was laid aside after former President Rodrigo Duterte took office in 2016 as he looked to forge closer ties with China.


Tap to enlarge© Provided by South China Morning Post

But the pact has now been revived under his successor Ferdinand Marcos Jnr, whose defence department put out a statement last month saying the Philippines was working with the US to speed up EDCA projects at existing sites, and "exploring new locations that will build a more credible mutual defence posture".

Existing EDCA locations include Cesar Basa Air Base, about 55km (34 miles) inland from Subic Bay; Fort Ramon Magsaysay in central Luzon - the Philippines' largest military base; and Lumbia Airport Base Station on the southern island of Mindanao.

Subic Bay is rumoured to be among the five additional EDCA sites that Philippine military chief Lieutenant General Bartolome Vicente Bacarro told local media last month the US had expressed an interest in, shortly before US Vice-President Kamala Harris' visit to the country.

These additional sites could be confirmed as early as December or January, according to Collin Koh, a research fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, who said "Manila is likely to expedite" the approval process amid heightened "threat perceptions in the South China Sea" - such as a recent flare-up over rocket debris that the Philippine military said was "forcefully" seized by the Chinese coastguard.

China denies using force to retrieve rocket debris from Philippines navy boat

Koh said Marcos may hold off on confirming the new EDCA locations until after his planned state visit to Beijing next month, however, to avoid leaving "a bad taste" in Chinese officials' mouths - adding that the expanded agreement was sure to be discussed during the president's visit.

The return of US troops to Subic Bay "would come across as rather disconcerting to Beijing", Koh said, as it would "allow the Americans to strengthen surveillance over key waterways close by, especially the highly strategic Bashi Channel" - part of the Luzon Strait that separates the Philippines' northernmost islands from Taiwan.

He said it would also enable the US to expand its military presence in the region and take part in more joint drills such as the annual Balikatan exercises, which have involved troops from Australia as well as other regional observer forces in the past.

Locking Manila into 'the US system of alliances'


Both Australia and the US already have a Visiting Forces Agreement with the Philippines, which allows their soldiers to conduct operations on Philippine soil.

Fellow US ally Japan is now also reportedly eyeing such a pact, according to Aries Arugay, a visiting fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, who said "this will be huge and a big deal as it will really lock the Philippines into the US system of alliances."

Japan and the Philippines already have close defence ties, with Tokyo vowing in 2013 to help Manila defend its "remote islands" in the South China Sea, and sending a small contingent of unarmed troops and armoured vehicles to play a "humanitarian support role" in joint US-Philippines drills in 2018.

China's continued coercion has driven the Philippines to seek closer military cooperation with the US

Gregory Poling, Centre for Strategic and International Studies

Meanwhile, Arugay said other members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations would largely welcome an increased US presence in the Philippines as he said "their beef against the US" under former President Donald Trump had been that it was "more absent than present in the region".

"Asean members have been longing for more US involvement in the region and this is why a lot of them have pivoted to China because they thought the US was unreliable and undependable," he said.

Given Subic Bay's size and favourable geography, a US return to the former naval base "makes sense", Arugay said.

US military set to return to Philippines' Subic Bay to counter China's presence

Gregory Poling, senior fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington, agreed - though he also noted that any possible EDCA site at Subic Bay would not resemble the old US base "in scale or function".

"It would be under complete Philippine control," he said, adding that Manila would have to approve in advance any joint exercises and the rotation of US forces.

That being said, the expansion of the EDCA "highlights just how much China's continued coercion has driven the Philippines to seek closer military cooperation with the US," Poling said.

More Articles from SCMP

Are China’s integrated arms systems a match for South Korean rivals?

Why Europe must break with US on China policy to avert global economic disaster

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), the leading news media reporting on China and Asia.

Copyright (c) 2022. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Holocaust denial spreading in the US -opinion

There has been interest by a still small number of academically educated, intellectual and political figures willing to participate in Holocaust “revisionism.”

By DANIEL S. GROSS
Published: DECEMBER 4, 2022

NAZI WAR criminal Adolf Eichmann sits at a desk inside his prison cell in Israel, 1961. To mark the 60th anniversary of his execution, KAN 11 aired a new series that brings to light important documentation of Eichmann’s admission of his guilt.
(photo credit: REUTERS)

The US Senate minority leader, Republican Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has condemned former president Donald Trump for meeting with Nicholas J. Fuentes, a figure described by the Anti-Defamation League as a white supremacist leader rebuked for “jokingly” denying the Holocaust.

McConnell stated that there is “no room in the Republican Party for antisemitism or white supremacy. And anyone meeting with people advocating that point of view, in my judgment, are highly unlikely to ever be elected president of the United States.”

Deflecting such criticism, Trump claims to have never heard of Fuentes before their meeting and that he had no idea about his antisemitic views. This might be true. Nonetheless, charismatic and knowledgeable world leaders inform themselves in advance about such issues before taking any consequential steps.

President Eisenhower anticipated holocaust denial

Scholars have highlighted the fact that prior to his election as president, Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower, while supreme allied commander in Europe and then military governor in Germany, had anticipated future attempts to re-characterize Nazi crimes as propaganda.


To combat such Holocaust denial, he had ordered extensive visual documentation of the death camps, which would immediately be used as evidence of the atrocities for use in the Nuremberg Trials.

General Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander, asked Winston Churchill to send British parliamentarians to Buchenwald.
 (credit: NATIONAL LIBRARY OF ISRAEL)

In researching Eisenhower’s legacy as it pertains to Jewish matters, historian Benjamin Runkle has described clearly and at length how “Eisenhower was the primary driver behind the memorialization of the Holocaust.”

The late eminent historian Robert S. Wistrich defined Holocaust denial as “a postwar phenomenon at whose core lies the rejection of the historical fact that six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis during World War II. Alongside explicit repudiation of the Holocaust, denial includes the minimization, banalization and relativization of the relevant facts and events, so as to cast doubt on the uniqueness or authenticity of what happened during the Shoah.”

Not only the work of fringe antisemites anymore

In discussing and warning against Holocaust denial, renowned Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer wrote in depth on the phenomenon known as Holocaust “revisionism.”

He has mapped out the ongoing stubborn process by which many different European, Middle Eastern and American self-proclaimed “experts” try to manipulate and reconstruct the deeds of the Nazis and their helpers. Bauer describes, for example, how some exclaim that rogue agents within the German apparatus are to blame, while others assert that the figures of the tortured and murdered victims have been exaggerated.

Many of these deniers go as far as to argue that the Holocaust did not occur at all and is no more than a Zionist hoax.

“Eisenhower was the primary driver behind the memorialization of the Holocaust.”Historian Benjamin Runkle

Of considerable concern, while the original dissemination of such denial has been the work of fringe antisemites, there has been expressed interest by an increasingly, yet still small number, of academically educated, intellectual and political figures willing to participate in this unholy endeavor.

Equally alarming, there has been a call within certain Western, even liberal circles to criticize what they deem a one-sided account of the Holocaust and of Hitler’s regime. Among his many conclusions, Bauer believes that Holocaust denial has been part of a spreading trend due to the incomprehensibility for many of the Holocaust itself.

This lack of comprehension, and need for palpable and acceptable explanations, gives way to the fabrication of the Holocaust’s limited scope, its alleged “true perpetrators,” or even its non-existence.

The words of Bauer and Wistrich resonate still. Local legislatures in Texas have recently drafted and approved House Bill 3979 and its follow-up, Texas Senate Bill 3. These relate to how current events or controversial issues of public policy or social affairs should be discussed in official educational forums and reflected in school curriculums.

The hope of the legislatures is that teachers will “strive to explore such issues from diverse and contending perspectives without giving deference to any one perspective.” On the face of it, it sounds reasonable.

Holocaust expert and historian Deborah Lipstadt speaks at the New Antisemitism, Holocaust denial and rewriting history conference earlier this week
 (credit: ISRAEL MALOVANI)

The necessity for educational mediums to confront falsehoods

Unfortunately, the topic of the Holocaust has already been subject to such scrutiny as reported by The Jerusalem Post (“Texas official orders teachers to present ‘opposing’ views on Holocaust,” October 17, 2021).

According to one Jewish educator mentioned in that report, teaching history under such a law would diminish the understanding of Nazi Germany as inherently antisemitic.

Due to the continued necessity for educational mediums in an effort to confront falsehoods regarding the scale, even existence, of the Shoah, numerous multi-episode documentaries are being produced and broadcast on significantly important publicly funded channels.

To mark the 60th anniversary of the execution of Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi official chiefly responsible for implementing the “Final Solution,” KAN 11 aired a new series, Eichmann: The Devil Speaks, by Yariv Mozer, which brings to light important documentation of Eichmann’s admission of his guilt. The series focuses on recordings of interviews between Eichmann and Dutch Nazi journalist Willem Sassen in the late 1950s.

These audio recordings contradict Eichmann’s denials regarding his own involvement at the highest levels of planning and executing Hitler’s plan to wipe out Europe’s Jews.


“We owe the young victims of the Holocaust and atrocities everywhere, our commitment to this understanding.”Principal Linda Hooper


Similarly, the acclaimed American documentarian Ken Burns and his colleagues have also completed a three-episode series titled The U.S. and the Holocaust. Broadcast on PBS, the series examines “America’s response to one of the greatest humanitarian crises of the 20th century” and calls for a reckoning with the possibility that the American nation failed to live up to its ideals as a “nation of immigrants.”

According to these documentarians, “as the catastrophe of the Holocaust unfolded in Europe, the United States proved unwilling to open its doors to more than a fraction of the hundreds of thousands of desperate people seeking refuge.”

Moreover, the series sets to delve “deeply into the tragic human consequences of public indifference, bureaucratic red tape and restrictive quota laws in America.”

In other words, not only are the horrors of the Holocaust undeniable, the lack of adequate responses by the United States may be unjustifiable and are to be lamented.

The late American-Jewish historian Oscar Handlin, noted for his pioneering studies on immigration to the US, once wrote that the use of history “lies in its capacity for advancing the approach to truth.” While remarking on the measure of truth in history, his contemporary Jewish historian Abraham Halkin proclaimed that it is every human’s duty to accept truth as it is revealed, and not as it is fashioned. In today’s climate, both scholars would dismiss any notion of so-called “alternative facts.”

THE HALL of Names at the Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem, April 20, 2020. (credit: RONEN ZVULUN/REUTERS)

Therefore, strategies devised by American educators such as the “Paper Clip Project,” first implemented at Whitwell Middle School in rural Tennessee, are to be commended. Principal Linda Hooper and her team began a Holocaust education class “that would be the basis for teaching tolerance and diversity in a voluntary after-school program. When the students, mostly white and Christian, struggled to grasp the concept and enormity of the six million Jews who died during the Holocaust, they decided to collect six million paper clips – one for each soul who perished.”

Since then, the school also dedicated a Children’s Holocaust Memorial, which includes an authentic German rail car filled with a portion of the more than 30 million paper clips they eventually collected. Most recently, Hooper has been vocal in her response to the attempted removal of Pulitzer Prize-winning books regarding the Holocaust from the curriculum by her county’s school board.

Her endeavors were designed to help young students “engage as global citizens” and to understand that we must respect the differences between people. “I wanted them to learn what happens when we don’t fully recognize the humanity of people from different ethnic backgrounds and cultures.”

In doing so, Hooper explains that “we owe the young victims of the Holocaust and atrocities everywhere, our commitment to this understanding.” Hopefully, thanks to the hard work of scholars, the skilled art of the documentarians, and passion of humanitarian educators, no Americans will choose to be complicit in the extermination of the memory of the victims.

The writer is a postdoctoral fellow at the Annenberg Center for American Studies at the Faculty of the Humanities, The Hebrew University in Jerusalem.






















MCCONNELL CALLS FOR FED REGS
Exclusive-Horse racing-U.S. Senator McConnell pushing for legislative fix to safety law




Sat, December 3, 2022 
By Rory Carroll

(Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell is pushing for a legislative fix to a law designed to make horse racing safer after an appeals court last month ruled it unconstitutional, a source with direct knowledge of the negotiations told Reuters.

The changes to the law, which would provide greater federal oversight of the board charged with writing and implementing safety rules, would be included in a full-year spending bill, known as an omnibus, which could pass later this month.


The Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (HISA) was created by Congress in 2020 to replace the state-by-state patchwork of regulations with national rules following a series of high-profile doping scandals and horse deaths that rocked the industry.

But the law was ruled unconstitutional by a federal appeals court in Louisiana, which said there was insufficient government oversight of the new authority in a case brought by various horse racing associations and some states.

McConnell, who hails from the horse racing stronghold of Kentucky, played a key role in getting the law passed and will seek changes to enhance the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) oversight of HISA, the source who spoke directly with the lawmaker said.


The source asked not to be identified to speak freely about the negotiations. McConnell's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Saturday.

If the changes are adopted as part of the spending bill, the law's backers say there should be no interruption to the implementation of HISA's rules, including the anticipated launch of its anti-doping and medication control program next month.

Supporters say the law is necessary to protect horses, jockeys and the sport as a whole, which they argue could fall out of favor with the public permanently if horses continue to die in training and competition.

Opponents argue that HISA would replace states' regulatory structures and allow new fees to be imposed on the industry.


While not guaranteed, McConnell told the source there is the political will in the Senate to pass the full-year spending bill as two key members of the Appropriations Committee – chair Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) and ranking member Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) – are set to retire and want to leave with the bill done.

(Reporting by Rory Carroll in Los Angeles; Editing by Ken Ferris)

CRIMINAL CRYPTO CAPITALI$M

How the Media Fell for SBF's Con Game—Again and Again and Again | Opinion


CHITRA RAGAVAN ,
 EXECUTIVE COACH AND STRATEGIC ADVISOR 
ON 12/2/22

Cryptocurrency FTX Says Hackers Stole Assets After Bankruptcy Filing


It's a good week to be one of the biggest alleged con men in recent American history. Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX which was recently revealed to be a giant Ponzi scheme, spent the week being applauded and coddled by some of the biggest national legacy media outlets.

On Wednesday, veteran ABC News anchor George Stephanopolous touted his nearly two-hour interview with Bankman-Fried to colleagues on the set of Good Morning America with a bemused smile and a twinkle in his eyes, describing a "wild interview" that felt at times "like a therapy session."

"I can't imagine what it feels like to go from $20 billion dollars to a $100,000 dollars," Stephanopolous said to Bankman-Fried with great empathy and asked him softly if he was "afraid to go to jail."



The Wall Street Journal's soft treatment of SBF in a piece earlier this month prompted Elon Musk to write on Twitter: "WSJ giving foot massages to a criminal."

Then there was SBF's virtual appearance at the New York Times' DealBook Summit, which elicited laughter and applause during a softball interview with veteran financial columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin. The interview was publicized alongside others with figures like actor Ben Affleck and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and throughout the interview, SBF minimized the enormity of his alleged con by acting like a teen who had missed curfew, saying, "Look, I screwed up."

Earlier in the month, New York Times crypto and fintech reporter David Yaffe-Bellany got "exclusive" access to Bankman-Fried, in which he also extended compassion to the alleged con artist, writing that he "sounded surprisingly calm." Some of the biggest leaders in the crypto called the piece a "Breathless Love Letter," a "puff piece" and "unquestionably soft."

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 30: Andrew Ross Sorkin and Sam Bankman-Fried on stage at the 2022 New York Times DealBook on November 30, 2022 in New York City.
THOS ROBINSON/GETTY IMAGES FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

But these post-revelation interviews in which a super villain is being handled with kid gloves are only the continuation of how the media has handled Bankman-Fried for years. Indeed, his media con has from the beginning been a huge success, and seems to be only getting revved up.

The failure to conduct basic due diligence of Bankman-Fried is after all what led to his ability to take so many people for a ride. That refusal to investigate reflects the complexity of the crypto industry and the difficulty involved in tracking the flow of funds and risk on the blockchain. But it's also further evidence of how the media gets hoodwinked by Robin Hood narratives, something many technology leaders have learned to leverage well.

The Houdini craftsmanship of SBF puts him on par with Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of Theranos who was just sentenced to 11 years in prison for her false claims about the blood testing she hyped. Like Holmes, Bankman-Fried used his physical aesthetic for strategic positioning. He uses his thick black curls, as undisciplined as his trades, and deliberately unkempt sartorial calling card of wrinkled t-shirts and shorts, even when meeting powerful people.


How did he get such positive media coverage and so little oversight? In part by publicly signing The Giving Pledge, "a promise by the world's wealthiest individuals and families to dedicate the majority of their wealth to charitable causes." SBF was famous for trumpeting his commitment to the principle of "effective altruism," vowing to give away his then-nearly $20 billion dollar fortune, with highly-publicized donations to liberal causes irresistible to media.

The magic act was successful. A global brand emerged out of thin air. He lived lavishly while being declared a monk. In October 2021, Forbes put him on its 40th Annual 400 list as the "world's richest 29-year-old." By the summer of 2022, SBF had reached the pinnacle, landing on the cover of Fortune with a laudatory question for a headline: "The Next Warren Buffett?"

READ MORE



But in building out his brand persona, the crypto Wünderkind forgot the sacred rule of strategic positioning: You must have a solid product or service to sell. And this SBF was lacking. Instead, he had a hollowed-out, incestuous, circular trading platform that bled out from FTX to his sibling trading firm, Alameda Research. It was only a matter of time before the world realized that the emperor had no clothes.

Since FTX's collapse, some editors and reporters have tried to figure out how they were conned. "It was all bullshit, of course, and I didn't see through it," Jeff John Roberts, author of the Fortune cover piece admitted to New York Magazine writer Shawn McCreesh.

But Fortune editor-in-chief Alyson Shontell has "no regrets" about putting him on the cover.


Because the media con, when done right, keeps on going.

Chitra Ragavan is an executive coach and strategic advisor to the founders and CEOs of technology firms, including cryptocurrency companies. She is a former journalist at NPR and U.S. News and World Report.


The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.



While the FTX Co-Founder Claims He 'Wasn’t Running Alameda,' SBF Is Asked Why He Threw Caroline Ellison 'Under the Bus'

 NEWS

While the former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has done numerous interviews, during these discussions he’s explained on numerous occasions that as far as Alameda Research is concerned, he “wasn’t running Alameda.” SBF wasn’t the CEO of the trading firm Alameda Research as the job was handled by Caroline Ellison, a former Jane Street trader and Stanford graduate. Ellison has been super silent since FTX’s collapse and there’s been speculation that she fled Hong Kong to reside in Dubai.

Where in the World Is Alameda’s CEO Caroline Ellison?

During Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) interviews he noted on several occasions that he did not run Alameda Research, the quantitative cryptocurrency trading firm and market maker that provided liquidity in cryptocurrency markets. During his Dealbook Summit interview, SBF stated “I wasn’t running Alameda,” and he further stressed he “didn’t know the size of their position.”

“I didn’t know exactly what was going on,” SBF told the audience watching the Dealbook Summit interview. On paper, it shows that SBF founded Alameda Research, but he claimed on several occasions that it was a completely different entity than FTX, despite the arguments that dispute his claims. Data shows that at one point Alameda had two CEOs — Sam Trabucco and Caroline Ellison. The cryptocurrency community assumes that if SBF didn’t know what was going on behind the scenes at Alameda, Trabucco and Ellison must have answers.

Trabucco, however, announced on Aug. 24, 2022, that he was leaving Alameda and he has not been speaking since the whole incident went haywire. The former co-CEO did write a cryptic tweet on Nov. 8, 2022, after the FTX’s calamity started. “Much love to everyone — I’m sure the past few days have been dark for many and I hope the road ahead is brighter,” Trabucco said. Since Trabucco left less than three months prior to FTX’s collapse, Ellison was the CEO left in charge.

While the FTX Co-Founder Claims He 'Wasn’t Running Alameda,' SBF Is Asked Why He Threw Caroline Ellison 'Under the Bus'

No one has heard from Ellison, the daughter of two MIT economists. However, she did tweet about Alameda’s balance sheet after the report Coindesk’s Ian Allison published on Nov. 2, 2022. “A few notes on the balance sheet info that has been circulating recently: – that specific balance sheet is for a subset of our corporate entities, we have [more than] $10B of assets that aren’t reflected there,” Ellison wrote. “The balance sheet breaks out a few of our biggest long positions; we obviously have hedges that aren’t listed. Given the tightening in the crypto credit space this year we’ve returned most of our loans by now,” Ellison added.

Like Trabucco, Ellison has not said a peep after her last tweets and no one has heard from her since. While SBF is not taking responsibility for Alameda because he “wasn’t running Alameda” and didn’t realize the positions it held, it still leaves someone responsible. Kim Dotcom highlighted this fact during SBF’s candid interview on Twitter Spaces when he asked how could people trust SBF after he “threw his lover under the bus.” SBF was very annoyed by this question, and he told Dotcom that he thought it was “f***ed up.” But in all reality, if SBF didn’t know what was going on at Alameda, then it is quite obvious who did.

Ellison has been covered by the media on several occasions, but the reports are only gathering public info from the web. Further, the reports have been condemned as puff pieces written by the establishment. The Alameda CEO has not spoken candidly with the New York Times, Good Morning America, or exclusive interviews with New York Magazine and Bloomberg. While she was the CEO of Alameda no one’s asked SBF where she is right now, and what she is doing about the entire FTX/Alameda fiasco. Ellison reportedly left Hong Kong and fled to Dubai, but reports are unconfirmed. Specific Gulf countries like the United Arab Emirates do not have extradition treaties with the United States.



US Trustee Plans to Appoint an Examiner to FTX Case, While SBF Describes Strange Margin Trading Practices




SBF Was 'Delusional,' Will 'Spend Time in Jail' Says Galaxy's Mike Novogratz — 'He Needs to Be Prosecuted'

BILLIONAIRES
Exclusive: Sam Bankman-Fried Knew Plenty About His Alameda Research Hedge Fund–And Sent Details To Forbes Just Months Ago

Chase Peterson-Withorn
Forbes Staff
Dec 2, 2022


ILLUSTRATION BY STEPHANIE JONES FOR FORBES; PHOTO BY VIRGILE SIMON BERTRAND FOR FORBES

With customers, investors and, potentially, law enforcement closing in, the fate of crypto wunderkind-turned-pariah Sam Bankman-Fried may rest on two key questions: What did he know about Alameda Research, and when did he know it?

Since the stunning, early November collapse of both Alameda, a secretive crypto hedge fund Bankman-Fried cofounded in 2017, and FTX, a crypto exchange he cofounded in 2019 and grew into one of the world’s largest, speculation has run rampant about how the two operations were intertwined and what chain of events drove both businesses into bankruptcy.

Bankman-Fried, in a series of high-profile media appearances this week, has begun offering his own working theory: Alameda took on far too much leverage to make risky investments on the FTX platform, and FTX failed to recognize and prevent it. A key claim: that Bankman-Fried himself didn’t really know what Alameda was up to.

“I was frankly surprised by how big Alameda’s position was,” Bankman-Fried said at The New York Times’ DealBook Summit on Wednesday. “Alameda is not, like, a company that I monitor day-to-day,” he claimed to New York magazine in an article published Thursday. “It’s not a company I run. It’s not a company I have run for the last couple years. And Alameda’s finances I was not deeply aware of. I was only surface-level aware of Alameda’s finances.”

Just how “surface-level” remains to be uncovered, as a bankruptcy team picks through the wreckage to retrace what occurred. But a look inside Bankman-Fried’s discussions with Forbes provides an early baseline of Bankman-Fried’s awareness of Alameda’s dealings: Since January 2021, Bankman-Fried has sent Forbes details of some of Alameda’s major holdings at least five times in response to questions about his net worth, including explaining the specifics of certain transactions and updating the number of FTT, Solana and Serum tokens Alameda held–as recently as late August.

Most of the world’s billionaires would rather not discuss their wealth. Not Bankman-Fried, who Forbes first approached about the subject in January 2021. “[H]appy to give an outline,” he wrote in an email. Later that week, he sent a handful of documents showing his ownership stakes in FTX (around half) and Alameda (90%), screenshots of wallets that held cryptocurrencies–and a Google Sheet listing his assets line-by-line, including details of his FTX equity plus holdings of 67.8 million Solana tokens, 193.2 million FTT tokens and 3 billion tokens of Serum.

Two months later, when Forbes was updating estimates for our annual World’s Billionaires list, Bankman-Fried updated the spreadsheet. Crypto prices were on the rise, plus Alameda had upped its share of FTT tokens, to 195.8 million. “Alameda funds under management, approx.” reads one line: $32,534,779,809. A separate column, listing only tokens that were unlocked–meaning able to be transacted–pegs Alameda’s total funds at a more modest $14.7 billion.

Updates like this arrived periodically–practically whenever Forbes asked for them. In September 2021, Bankman-Fried added a new tab to the Google Sheet. Alameda’s funds under management had grown to $37.6 billion, $16.8 billion counting only unlocked tokens. The business had made some Solana trades, he explained, and the number of FTT tokens on his balance sheet had also shifted. Bankman-Fried was well versed in the details: “[W]e used ~20mm FTT tokens as part of the funds to purchase back FTX equity from Binance (causing the decrease), and then subsequently repurchased that FTT in the market,” he wrote to Forbes. “So, as of now (a bit different from a few weeks ago!), we're back up to 186,442,198 unlocked FTT (after having sold off a bit on the recent rally).”



September 2021: With crypto markets riding high, Bankman-Fried created this Google Sheet for Forbes, pegging his net worth at $26.3 billion, including $17 billion in wealth tied up in Alameda. We estimated his fortune to be $22.5 billion around then
.FORBES

In March 2022, Bankman-Fried updated the spreadsheet again with more specifics about his share of what Alameda owned. FTT holdings were down to 176 million tokens; Solana was down to 53 million. In late August, about a month before Bankman-Fried’s empire began to crumble, he again walked Forbes through his net worth, providing a capitalization table of FTX and FTX U.S.’ biggest shareholders. A new tab in the Google Sheet showed Alameda’s holdings too, with its investments in Solana, Serum and FTT unchanged at 53 million, 3 billion and 176 million, respectively. The total value of his share of Alameda’s funds under management, per Bankman-Fried at the time: $8.6 billion, or $6.4 billion counting only unlocked tokens. By then, there was much more going on below the surface, with Alameda likely in deep trouble, suffering from trading losses on highly-leveraged bets.


August 2022: Just a month before his empire crashed, Bankman-Fried created this Google Sheet for Forbes. He marked his own wealth at $26.5 billion. Forbes went with $17.2 billion.
FORBES

The level of detail Bankman-Fried provided to Forbes over the years shows that he had detailed knowledge of some of Alameda’s holdings and at least some knowledge of the transactions it was making, especially in 2021, despite stepping back from running the hedge fund after cofounding FTX in 2019. Bankman-Fried long insisted the two businesses operated independently of one another, though he is a shareholder of both.

It remains unclear how involved he was in Alameda’s operations, and his conversations with Forbes don’t necessarily show that he was aware of all of the hedge fund’s activities–the snapshots he sent were clearly incomplete, listing only major holdings, and he explained only a few major transactions, such as token purchases in 2021. Bankman-Fried has said Alameda ran into trouble in recent months. He declined to comment for this story.

Forbes based much of its estimate of Bankman-Fried’s net worth, which peaked at $26.5 billion in late 2021 but now appears to be close to zero, on the value outside investors like Sequoia Capital and Singapore government fund Temasek ascribed to FTX and its U.S. operations. We applied sizable discounts to Bankman-Fried’s self-reported Alameda holdings. In August, Forbes pressed Bankman-Fried for more details on his assets and liabilities, including a breakdown of Alameda’s balance sheet–both its investments and any debts it owed. “[W]orking on it!” he wrote in an email, opening the possibility that he went digging into Alameda’s books at least as recently as late August, more than a month before he said this week he became aware of what the business was up to. “[W]ill see what I can get,” Bankman-Fried wrote later that day, “a bunch is spread between a ton of wallets…” He never sent any more details.


CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
ABB to pay USD315M to settle US charges over South Africa bribes

December 4, 2022

NEW YORK (AFP) – Swedish-Swiss industrial company ABB agreed to pay USD315 million to settle United States (US) criminal charges that it bribed state-owned Eskom of South Africa over government contracts, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Friday.

Two affiliates of ABB each pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as part of a three-year deferred prosecution agreement, the US agency said of a settlement that was coordinated with government authorities in Switzerland, Germany and South Africa.

The issue concerns a troubled project near Johannesburg with the Kusile power station, the fourth largest coal-fired generator in the world, which has been fraught with allegations of graft. South Africa’s struggling power utility Eskom commissioned the plant in 2007.

In October eight people, including former Eskom CEO Matshela Koko, were arrested on corruption charges linked to the ABB work.

Between 2014 and 2017, ABB through its subsidiaries secured “multiple” government contracts, syphoning illicit payments through subcontractors associated with an official at Eskom, South Africa’s state-owned power company, the DOJ said.

“ABB worked with these subcontractors despite their poor qualifications and lack of experience,” the DOJ said in a news release. “In return, ABB received improper advantages in its efforts to obtain work with Eskom, including, among other benefits, confidential and internal Eskom information.”

ABB engaged in “sham” negotiations with the Eskom official and falsely reported the payments as legitimate business expenses, according to the press release.

ABB Chief Executive Bjorn Rosengren said the company has acted in the wake of the case by “launching a new code of conduct, educating employees and implementing an enhanced control system to prevent something similar from happening again.”

In a statement, he said that ABB has “a clear zero tolerance approach to non-ethical behaviour within our company.”

The US agency said the penalty was reduced 25 per cent from the high end of the sentencing range in light of ABB’s “extraordinary” cooperation and “extensive” remediation efforts.

But the department noted that ABB had two earlier criminal FCPA resolutions in 2004 and 2010, as well as a guilty plea by an ABB entity for bid rigging in 2001.

The US law on foreign corrupt practices applies to foreign companies with US-issued stock, as is the case with ABB.

The company also settled a parallel civil case with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Earlier Friday, the Swiss attorney general’s office said the company was fined CHF4 million (USD4.3 million) in the case.

ABB said it hoped to reach a resolution with German authorities in the near term.

THEY WILL NEED IT FOR THE FINES

ABB raises $209m from selling stake in EV charging business

Reuters | November 21, 2022 | 
Credit: ABB

ABB has raised around 200 million Swiss francs ($209 million) from selling an 8% stake in its electric vehicle (EV) charging business, as the Swiss engineering and technology company drums up interest in a unit it hopes to float next year.


The private placement of shares was led by investors with links to Swedish furniture giant IKEA and car dealership chain AMAG and gives the E-mobility business an equity value of 2.4 billion to 2.5 billion francs.

Investors expect a surge in demand for EV charging points as European regulations push automakers and drivers alike to make the switch from fossil-fuelled cars.

The placement is a positive sign for ABB after the company earlier this year delayed a planned flotation of E-mobility, citing stock market turbulence.

The Swiss group, which will retain 92% of E-mobility, has indicated it now plans to carry out the flotation in the second half of 2023.

Proceeds from the stake sale will be used by E-mobility to grow organically and make acquisitions in hardware and software, ABB said.

The new investors include Interogo Holding, as well as moyreal holding, a Swiss family office, and E-mobility chairman Michael Halbherr.

Interogo, an international investment group based in Switzerland, is owned by Interogo Foundation, the ultimate owner of Inter IKEA Group, the group of companies that connects franchisees of the Swedish furniture company. Moyreal is the investment vehicle of AMAG car dealership heiress Eva Maria Bucher-Haefner.

ABB did not give the breakdown of the individual stakes given in return for the investment.

“We remain committed to our strategy to separately list our E-mobility business subject to constructive market conditions,” ABB CEO Bjorn Rosengren said in a statement.

“The private placement underpins our joint commitment to ensure ABB E-mobility’s fast growth in order to remain best positioned to lead the sector in EV charging solutions.”

($1 = 0.9570 Swiss francs)

(By John Revill; Editing by Mark Potter and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
CANADA
Mountain Province finds new kimberlite around Gahcho Kue mine

Staff Writer | November 23, 2022 |
 
Mountain Province’s flagship operation is its 49%-owned Gahcho Kué mine,
 in Canada’s Northwest Territories. (Credit: MPD)

Mountain Province Diamonds (TSX:MPV), which holds a 49% stake in the Gahcho Kué mine in Canada, has found a new kimberlite on the claims and leases surrounding the operation in the Northwest Territories.


The new KE kimberlite is a distinct occurrence that is located about 450metres east of the Kelvin kimberlite, the Toronto-based miner said on Wednesday.

The find was the result of the company’s 2022 program, which focused on new discoveries through a detailed analysis of both new and historic geophysical, geological, and kimberlite indicator mineral data.

The KE kimberlite, identified by the end of the summer, adds to the Hearn Northwest extension at Gahcho Kué, found earlier this year.

Further drilling of the KE kimberlite is planned for the 2023 exploration program, Mountain Province said.

The KE discovery comes about six months after the diamond company reported positive kimberlite intersections from drilling at its Kennady North project last winter. Hypabyssal kimberlite and volcaniclastic kimberlite was intersected in 16 of 20 drill holes at three sites at Kennady North, located about 300 km northeast of Yellowknife.

The Gahcho Kué mine is slated to operate until 2028. The territory’s two other diamond mines – Ekati, operated by Arctic Canadian Diamond – and Rio Tinto’s (ASX, NYSE, LON: RIO) Diavik are expected to close in 2024 and 2025, respectively. Diavik is about 30 km southeast of Ekati, and Gahcho Kué is 125 km southeast of Diavik.

Gahcho Kué is a joint venture between Mountain Province and De Beers Group, which owns 51%.
NEW AEON GOLD RUSH
Birthplace of gold-rich stars finally revealed

Staff Writer | November 23, 2022 | 

The simulated Milky Way-like galaxy at present taken from the simulation produced in the study. (Image simulation by Takayuki Saitoh; visualization by Takaaki Takeda, courtesy of the Royal Astronomical Society).

Researchers at the University of Notre Dame and Tohoku University have revealed the birthplace of so-called “gold-rich” stars—with an abundance of heavy elements beyond iron, including gold and platinum.


In a paper published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, the scientists explain that most gold-rich stars formed in small progenitor galaxies of the Milky Way over 10 billion years ago. These findings shed light on the stars’ past for the first time.

To reach this conclusion, the team tracked the Milky Way’s formation from the Big Bang to the present with a numerical simulation. This simulation has the highest time resolution yet achieved or, in other words, it can precisely resolve the cycle of materials formed by stars in the Milky Way.

Using the ATERUI II supercomputer in the Center for Computational Science at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, the researchers were able to analyze the standard cosmology it uses and predict that the Milky Way grows by the accretion and merging of small progenitor galaxies.

The simulation data revealed that some of the progenitor galaxies contained large amounts of the heaviest elements. Each event of neutron star merger—a confirmed site of heavy element nucleosynthesis—increased the abundance of the heaviest elements in these small galaxies. The gold-rich stars formed in these galaxies and their predicted abundances can be compared with the observations of the stars today.

“The gold-rich stars today tell us the history of the Milky Way—we found most gold-rich stars are formed in dwarf galaxies over 10 billion years ago,” Yutaka Hirai, one of the study authors at Tohoku University, said in a media statement.

“These ancient galaxies are the building blocks of the Milky Way. Our findings mean many of the gold-rich stars we see today are the fossil records of the Milky Way’s formation over 10 billion years ago.”
Thieves steal ancient gold coins in German museum heist
Bloomberg News | November 23, 2022 | 

Twenty Deutsch Mark gold coins. Credit: Adobe Stock

German police are appealing for witnesses after thieves broke into a Bavarian museum on Tuesday night and made off with a horde of nearly 500 ancient gold coins worth several million euros.


The coins, dating from around 100 BC, were discovered in 1999 during excavation work in the municipality of Manching north of Munich and are touted by the local museum as the largest Celtic gold find of the 20th century.

It’s the latest instance of museum theft in Germany following the looting in 2019 of a diamond-encrusted dagger, a pearl necklace and dozens of other artifacts estimated to be worth more than $1 billion from Dresden’s Green Vault.

In 2020, a Berlin court convicted three men for stealing a 100-kilogram (220-pound), gold coin worth $4 million from a museum in the center of the German capital.

(By Iain Rogers)
BAD  CANADIAN MINER
Barrick faces new lawsuit for alleged rights abuses in Tanzania

Staff Writer | November 23, 2022 | 

North Mara, Buzwagi (pictured) and Bulyanhulu mines are now owned 84% by Barrick and 16% by the Tanzania government. (Image courtesy of Acacia Mining.)

Twenty-one Tanzanian nationals filed a lawsuit in Ontario Supreme Court Wednesday morning against Barrick Gold (TSE: ABX) for alleged human rights violations at the company’s North Mara gold mine in Tanzania.



It is the first time the Canadian gold giant has faced legal action in its home country for alleged abuses abroad, but it has faced prior allegations in the UK.

In 2020, a group of eight Tanzanians filed a legal claim at the British High Court against a subsidiary of Barrick Gold, alleging human rights abuses by security forces at North Mara mine.


The claimants were assisted by two non-profit organizations, RAID and Miningwatch Canada, and were represented by British law firm Hugh James.

“The action by the plaintiffs, who are members of the Indigenous Kurya community amongst whose villages in northern Tanzania the mine has been built, concerns brutal killings, shootings and torture that they allege were committed by police engaged to guard the mine, who local residents refer to as ‘mine police’,” RAID said regarding the new suit in a press release on Wednesday.

They are represented by the law firms Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman LLP and Waddell Phillips. Filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the case includes claims for five deaths, five incidents of torture, and a further five injuries from shootings by the ‘mine police’, RAID reported.

This is the third lawsuit against Barrick subsidiaries for deaths and injuries at the North Mara mine. The first, commenced in 2013, was settled in 2015 by Acacia Mining.

As of 2pm EST Wednesday, Barrick had not issued a statement.

Ottawa is growing increasingly concerned about how Canadian miners do business abroad. Earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau asked Chile’s President Gabriel Boric to provide information on how much Canadian miners are complying with the South American nation’s environmental legislation.

Tanzania villagers sue Barrick Gold over rights abuses
November 25, 2022 Jurist


A group of Tanzanian villagers on Nov. 23 filed legal action with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Canadian mining company Barrick Gold over human rights violations at its North Mara Gold Mine. It marks the first time that the mining company has faced legal action in Canada for rights violations abroad. The plaintiffs, members of the indigenous Kurya community in northern Tanzania, allege that special “mine police” assigned by the security forces to protect the facility use extreme violence against local residents. The mine has been the site of repeated protests over environmental degradation and forced displacement of villagers. The legal action includes claims for five deaths, five incidents of torture and five injuries from shootings.

“The North Mara mine is notorious for violence against the Kurya people who lived on, farmed and mined the land on which Barrick’s mine has been built,” corporate watchdog Rights & Accountability in Development (RAID) said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. Barrick Gold has claimed in previous statements about violence at the North Mara site that it “does not manage or control an independent police force.” Barrick has not publicly commented on the new legal action.

From Jurist, Nov. 24. Used with permission.

See our last reports on the the North Mara Mine and the crimes of Barrick Gold.

Map via Semantic Scholar