Saturday, April 12, 2025


Watch live: MPs return to Westminster for emergency vote to save British Steel


Photo: Number 10/Flickr

Labour MPs from across the country have returned to Westminster for an emergency vote in Parliament on the future of British Steel.

The government aims to save blast furnaces in Scunthorpe, the last of their kind in the country, from closure with plans to bring the firm into public hands. Jingye, the Chinese owners of British Steel, have said the site is not financial sustainable, with fears that the furnaces could close within days without intervention.

The Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill would instruct firms to keep such assets operational, and would grant the government the power to take over those assets if companies fail to comply. A compensation scheme for costs incurred by a company is also included in the bill, along with criminal sanctions for any firms that disregard the government’s demands.

In a speech yesterday, the Prime Minister said that the future of British Steel “hangs in the balance” and said that the government would “act with urgency”.

He said: “We will pass emergency legislation in one day to give the Business Secretary the powers to do everything possible to stop the closure of these blast furnaces. And as I have said, we will keep all options on the table.

“Our future is in our hands. This government will not sit back and just hope. We will act  to secure Britain’s future – with British Steel: made in Britain, in the national interest.”

READ MORE: ‘The government must re-nationalise British Steel’

General secretary of steelworkers’ union Community Roy Richkuss welcomed the move to recall Parliament and said: “It is in the national interest that a solution is found to secure a future for British Steel as a vital strategic business. We can’t allow Britain to become the only G7 country without primary steelmaking capacity.

“In the absence of a deal with Jingye to continue blast furnace operations at Scunthorpe as part of  a transition to greener steelmaking, it is essential that we see urgent action taken to bring British Steel into public ownership.”

You can watch the debate in the House of Commons live from 11am below.



Reform UK Maga-style think tank secures over £1 million in funding pledges

Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

The think tank was set up by mining tycoons David Lilley and Mark Thompson



A MAGA-style think tank with ties to Reform UK has already secured £1 million in pledged donations and started hiring staff, according to the Financial Times.

The think tank has also set up an office in Millbank Tower, Westminster.

The group, named Resolute 1850, is seeking donations from “US donors from MAGA, Tech, Religious conservatives,” and will be used to help Reform strengthen its policy platform.

According to records on Companies House, Resolute 1850 has three directors: Jonathan Brown, Reform UK’s former chief operating officer, former Tory donor David Lilley and Mark Thompson, an investor in metals and fossil fuels.

Lilley, who is a metals trader, donated over £250,000 to Reform UK last year.

Brown, chief executive of the group, told the FT that the think tank plans to work with multiple clients. “We are not simply a Reform think-tank,” he said. “It doesn’t matter whether the cat is black or white so long as it catches mice.”

According to Politics Home, Resolute 1850 may be launched as early as this spring.

A leaked presentation shared with the FT outlines the group’s research focuses, which include helping right-wing parties win in Parliament and working to “roll back the quangocracy and DEI agenda”.

The think tank also aims to “unlock the potential of private enterprise and roll back the state,” while promoting “realistic climate policy” and “realistic and restrained immigration policy”.


Union slams Nigel Farage for holding its ‘Save Our Steel’ posters in mayoral election photo op


Olivia Barber 
9 April, 2025 

‘Nigel Farage does not speak for Community. Farage is holding old posters and does not represent steelworker interests.’


TweetShareWhatsAppMail


Community Union has called Nigel Farage out for posing with union posters and claiming he will protect British steelworkers during a visit to Scunthorpe steel works yesterday.

In a photo stunt ahead of the Greater Lincolnshire mayoral election on 1 May, Farage shared a photo of him with Reform UK’s mayoral candidate Andrea Jenkyns and deputy leader of Reform, Richard Tice, claiming his party will nationalise British Steel.

Community Union swiftly rebuked Farage’s claims: “Nigel Farage does not speak for Community. @UKLabour is working with unions and workers to secure the best outcome for Scunthorpe. Farage is holding old posters and does not represent steelworker interests.”

A Community spokesperson told Left Foot Forward that the leaflets Farage, Tice and Jenkyns were holding in the photo opp were at least five or six years old.

The ‘Save Our Steel’ poster, they noted, was from before the pandemic, while current campaign materials now feature the message: ‘Britain, we need our steel.’

They also said the union had no involvement in the visit and that it doesn’t align itself with Farage.

In an interview on BBC Breakfast this morning, Farage claimed “Unless within three days that Scunthorpe plant is nationalised those blast furnaces will go”.

Farage repeated his claim that net zero targets are causing de-industrialisation, in the form of cement and aluminium plants closing, and now the potential loss of Scunthorpe steelworks.

Reform UK’s election campaign stunt comes as the Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed the government is in discussions with unions about the future of British Steel and is considering nationalising the steel company.

In March, British Steel’s Chinese owner Jingye announced plans to consult on shutting down the site’s two blast furnaces in June, or at a later date if an agreement with the government can be reached.

Scunthorpe is home to the UK’s last remaining blast furnace steelworks, and employs 2,700 workers directly and more through supply chains across the country.

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward
UK Covid VIP lane: Arrest made in fraud investigation
“No clarity, no transparency, and no meaningful engagement”

8 April, 2025 


The Good Law Project has revealed that Karen Brost, the director of Luxe Lifestyle – a firm that bagged a £25.7m PPE contract when it had no employees and thousands of pounds of debts – has been arrested on suspicion of fraud and interviewed under caution by HMRC, and her husband, Tim Whyte, is also being investigated in connection with the offence.



An arrest has been made amid ongoing investigations into people who made millions during the Covid pandemic through the Tories’ unlawful VIP lane used to award contracts.

The Good Law Project has revealed that Karen Brost, the director of Luxe Lifestyle – a firm that bagged a £25.7m PPE contract when it had no employees and thousands of pounds of debts – has been arrested on suspicion of fraud and interviewed under caution by HMRC, and her husband, Tim Whyte, is also being investigated in connection with the offence.

In 2022, the High Court ruled that the Government’s operation of a fast-track VIP lane for awarding lucrative PPE contracts to those with political connections was unlawful. The ‘VIP lane’ saw companies fast-tracked for consideration in lucrative contracts at the start of the pandemic if they were referred by MPs, ministers and government officials.

The Good Law Project reports: “Luxe Lifestyle won the contract after the Tory activist Mark Higton contacted the former trade minister Greg Hands about the firm’s offer to provide PPE. Higton was chair of one of Greg Hands’s local constituency parties at the time.

“Good Law Project understands from an HMRC document that it suspects Luxe Lifestyle made a profit in excess of £5m on the transaction. Much of the PPE supplied as part of this £25.7m deal was deemed unsuitable for use by the NHS.

“When contacted by Good Law Project, HMRC said that it could neither confirm nor deny investigations and did not comment on identifiable taxpayers.”

Lawyers for Brost say that she denied the allegations and offences in interview and was released without charge and is not subject to bail.

Lawyers for Whyte said that he is unable to offer any comment until the HMRC investigation has finished, but that the PPE supplied by Luxe Lifestyle was delivered to the specification required by the Department of Health and Social Care and was used by the NHS.

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward


“No clarity, no transparency, and no meaningful engagement”

April 11, 2025

Is the Government on the verge of a betrayal over its long-promised Hillsborough Law? asks Matt Fowler.

As Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, we are adding our voices to a simple but urgent demand: the Hillsborough Law must be passed in full. No compromises. No half-measures. No more promises broken.

We know what it’s like to be lied to, to be left in the dark, and to be forced to fight for the truth while grieving for our loved ones. During the pandemic, we watched decisions being taken behind closed doors while we were told everything was under control. We watched responsibility passed from one department to another. We heard reassurances that turned out to be false. We were lied to over and over again. And when we asked questions, we met silence, deflection or spin.

The culture we encountered wasn’t new. It’s the same culture that’s shaped the long struggles faced by the Hillsborough families, the survivors of Grenfell, the victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal, and those who lost loved ones to the infected blood scandal, to name just a few cases. In every one of those cases, there was a moment when the state or an institution could have chosen to be honest. And in every one of those cases, it decided not to be.

That’s why we’re part of the fight for a real, undiluted Hillsborough Law. The law, originally introduced to Parliament in 2017, would establish a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials, forcing them to tell the truth and to assist investigations and inquiries. It would guarantee equal legal representation for bereaved families, who are so often left trying to crowdfund legal costs while state bodies have teams of publicly funded lawyers. It would introduce sanctions for those who lie or obstruct the process.

Every part of this matters. We’ve seen how delay, deflection and denial damage families, destroy trust and prevent change. We’ve watched ministers make statements about rebuilding public confidence while refusing to tell the public the truth. We’ve heard countless apologies and promises that ‘lessons will be learned’, without concrete action actually being taken. The Hillsborough Law would change that.

The Government promised to introduce the legislation before the next Hillsborough anniversary. Not only will that promise be broken, but we are being kept in the dark about what the Government intends to do with the legislation, full stop. There has been no clarity, no transparency, and no meaningful engagement with the families who have most at stake.

We are deeply concerned that when the Bill comes, it will be a watered-down version that drops the legal duty of candour, quietly removes the commitment to equal funding, or makes oversight optional. That would not be the Hillsborough Law. That would be a betrayal, dressed up as progress.

We will not accept a law that keeps things as they are. We will not accept a gesture in place of justice. If this law is passed without the core commitments that make it meaningful, it will not protect future families. It will not change the system that failed us. It will just allow the same failures to happen again.

The fact is that the system isn’t broken; it’s working exactly as designed, to protect institutions and wear families down. The Hillsborough Law is not a symbolic fix. It’s a practical one. That’s the law we need. One that forces honesty. One that gives the victims of state injustice a fair chance. One that ensures change actually happens. Anything less is a failure and yet another betrayal of the Hillsborough families at the hands of Government.

Many Members of Parliament now on the Government benches stood shoulders to shoulder with the Hillsborough Families in Opposition and promised that passing this Bill would be one of the first things they would do in Government. Those Members of Parliament must now ask themselves whether they can look their constituents in the eye if they vote for a gutted version of this law.

If they do, then it will not just be a betrayal of the Hillsborough families. It will be a betrayal of all the victims, survivors and families of those injustices with which we are so familiar. A decision to abandon those victims of state injustice would be an unforgivable betrayal.

Matt Fowler, who lost his father to Covid in 2020, is Co-Founder of Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK.

Image: Hillsborough Memorial, Crosby Library https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hillsborough_Memorial,_Crosby_Library.jpg. Source: Walk to Thornton, Merseyside (45. Author: Rept0n1x., licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

UK

Keir Starmer confirms he is still committed lowering the voting age to 16


9 April, 2025 
Left Foot Forward

“We will definitely get it done, it’s a manifesto commitment and we intend to honour it."




Prime Minister Keir Starmer has confirmed that he is still committed to lowering the vote age to 16, telling Parliament that the “sky didn’t fall in” when the measure was introduced elsewhere in Britain.

Appearing before Parliament’s liaison committee, Starmer was asked about the government’s pledge in its manifesto to lower the voting age and why it wasn’t included in the King’s speech.

He replied: “We will definitely get it done, it’s a manifesto commitment and we intend to honour it.

“I think that if you’re old enough to go out to work, if you’re old enough to pay your taxes, then you are entitled to have a say on how your taxes are spent. And also we do have voting at a younger age in different parts of the United Kingdom and the sky didn’t fall in.

“So it’s a commitment we made, it’s a commitment we intend to keep.”

In its manifesto, Labour committed to giving “16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote in all elections.”

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward
The UK Planning and Infrastructure Bill will see growth and green ambition go hand in hand

Opinion
10 April, 2025 


Labour must hold its nerve. In the end, what nature does not need are further processes



For far too long, when it comes to building the housing and infrastructure our country so desperately needs, we have allowed delay to masquerade as environmental concern, allowing desperately needed infrastructure that would benefit working people, and the environment itself, to be kicked into the long grass. The Tories would have you believe that housing and nature cannot coexist, but the Planning and Infrastructure Bill finally dispels that myth. Labour has recognised that we do need new water reservoirs, train lines and homes and it can benefit our environment. The challenge that the climate crisis presents us with, cannot be met with requirements for builders to stick newt hotels, bat bridges, or even more commonly a flat refusal for the homes that working people need. With modernising the system and thinking about the environment as a whole, we can show that smart planning can deliver both homes and a more sustainable future.

The period between 1951 and 1955 was a golden era of housebuilding, with 1.5 million new homes built and millions of people elevated from pre-war living conditions to post-war abundance. But strict planning rules introduced in 1955 tanked this housing boom, and allowed the greenbelt to be greatly expanded, a system designed not for environmental protection but to choke the natural growth of cities. When governments did seek to build, it was usually in less politically sensitive areas which were far from job opportunities for working-class people. Over 70 years on we have a housing crisis that drives regional inequality, locks people out of opportunity, and industries out of high quality workers. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill, introduced to Parliament on the 11th of March, sets out to remove some of the biggest barriers to growth in this country.

Today, our planning system is outdated and places huge constraints on the ability of governments to build any infrastructure. The loops and hurdles that planning applications need to go through mean that we too often face infrastructure paralysis. The requirement for HS2 to provide a bat tunnel costing £120 million pounds despite no real evidence that a single bat would be affected is a perfect example of these ludicrous requirements. Protecting our natural environment is a responsibility we must not shirk from, but surely that £120 Million would be better invested in our strategic national corridors and degraded woodlands which currently go underfunded. This bat tunnel is the perfect example of symbolism over substance, it simply isn’t effective conservation.

The introduction of Environmental Delivery Plans (EDPs) and the Nature Restoration Fund will move development past nonsensical piecemeal mitigation to a more strategic system for effectively protecting the environment. EDPs, which will be prepared by Natural England, will set out the affected environmental features by a proposed development and match these with the required conservation measures to protect those environmental features. Developers will then have to give money to Natural England to carry out the necessary conservation measures through the Nature Recovery Fund. This will play a key role in embedding nature recovery into our national infrastructure strategy as it pools together money from different developments to effectively benefit the environment.

To be an effective environmentalist means that we need to take large-scale action, not prevent progress. Some climate activists are upset that the vast sums for the Nature Restoration Fund will be raised from developers. This completely misses the crucial point of the bill to replace outdated and inefficient processes that block homes and don’t effectively protect nature. Currently, developers pay for environmental mitigations but in an incredibly ineffective and ad hoc manner. This will be replaced with a more robust, strategic system that empowers Natural England to invest in nature projects. The winner from this is ultimately environmental projects that will receive better funding.

The choice facing us is one of process or outcomes. Spending hundreds of millions on hyper-local mitigations is simply a poor use of conservation funding when larger projects have a much higher impact per £ spent. Growth and nature recovery can absolutely go hand in hand, but it will be impossible without the legislation in this bill to modernise the system.

Labour must hold its nerve. In the end, what nature does not need are further processes. It needs strategy, not stalling. Growth and green ambition go hand in hand and activists have an important role to play in shaping a new narrative. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill must succeed, as it is, to deliver for people and the planet. Growth and nature aren’t enemies – delay is.

Issy Waite is National Secretary of Labour Students and a former parliamentary candidate
Good Law Project launches campaign to tackle disinformation on Meta

7 April, 2025 



The Good Law Project has launched a campaign to tackle disinformation on Meta, the owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, accusing Mark Zuckerberg’s platforms of making money ‘out of feeding us disinformation and dodgy ads through its recommender algorithms’.

It states that ‘Instagram, Facebook and Threads are full of disinformation and conspiracy theories, much of which is paid content’, adding: “These are all platforms owned by the billionaire tech bro and buddy of Donald Trump, Mark Zuckerberg.”

At the beginning of the year it was announced by Meta that it was abandoning the use of independent fact checkers on Facebook and Instagram, in a bid to cosy up to Trump.

Trump and his Republican allies have previously criticised Meta for its fact-checking policy, calling it censorship of right-wing voices.

The Good Law Project states: “Things were already bad enough before Zuckerberg sacked the fact checkers, but now his platforms are like the wild west. Not so much about freedom of speech as the freedom to make money out of feeding us disinformation and dodgy ads through its recommender algorithms.”

The organisation says that it is working with tech legal experts at AWO, to demand Meta answers a simple question: ‘Why is it forcing UK users to accept invasive paid content?’

Users are being asked to tell Meta to stop targeting them with paid content.

You can find a link to the campaign here.


Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward
Revealed: Nationalisation of utilities would save the UK billions, according to new report


7 April, 2025

Nationalisation would pay for itself in less than seven years


TweetShareWhatsAppMail


UK households would save £7.8 billion a year if water, energy grids, and Royal Mail were nationalised, according to a new report by the University of Greenwich for We Own It.

Households would be £142 better off a year on average as a result of nationalising energy grids, and £113 better off if English water companies were nationalised.

This is after compensating for returning shareholders’ investment under nationalisation, which would cost £49.7 billion.

This figure is significantly lower than the £200 billion quoted by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) as it would only repay shareholders the money they invested, rather than paying ‘market values’, which would result in excessive returns at the expense of UK households.

There is no legal obligation for the government to pay market value when nationalising industries. Both Labour and Conservative governments have nationalised without paying full compensation.

For example, Labour nationalised Railtrack in 2002 for £500 million, a sum the courts accepted as lawful.

Professor David Hall, co-author of the report, said “nationalisation would pay for itself in less than seven years”.

Meanwhile, the £3.6 billion takeover of Royal Mail by Czech billionaire Daniel KÅ™etínský is due to complete later this month.

Renationalising water companies

Public ownership of water companies would reduce water bills by £3–5bn a year.

The report finds 35p of every £1 on English water bills goes to shareholders. In Scotland, just 8p in every £1 goes to shareholders, and bills are £113 lower.

“We’re all paying a 35% ‘privatisation tax’ on our water bills,” said Matthew Topham, lead campaigner at We Own It. “By ditching private shareholders and bringing water back into public ownership, we will save up to £5 billion a year.”

The government has previously claimed it would cost up to £100 billion to renationalise water.

The figure has been widely debunked, with Labour MP Clive Lewis calling it “a smokescreen by private companies” to protect private ownership.

Topham added: “By refusing to take water into public ownership, the government is starving our water sector of billions of investment every single year – they must act now before the entire system collapses.”

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward
UK MPs join cross-party photo in solidarity with Labour colleagues barred from entering Israel


8 April, 2025


Over 70 MPs, including government ministers, posed in protest after two Labour MPs were denied entry to Israel.



More than 70 MPs, including senior ministers, posed for a photo in Westminster Hall yesterday in protest against Israel’s decision to deny entry to two Labour MPs.

The photocall, organised by Labour MP Paul Waugh, was staged in solidarity with Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed, the Labour MPs barred from entering Israel and the West Bank on Saturday.

Israeli authorities claimed the pair intended to “document the activities of security forces and spread anti-Israel hatred”.

But in a powerful speech in the Commons, Mohamed said they had been “denied entry based on our legitimate political opinions, which are firmly aligned with international law”.

“This act was not just a diplomatic affront. This wasn’t about security. It was about control and censorship,” the Sheffield Central MP added.

Yang, a former journalist, said she understood the risks of travelling to the region, but “did not, however, anticipate the risks of detention and deportation from a British ally.”

“People around the world are listening to us,” she added. “Our voice is powerful, and we must continue to use it without fear or favour.”

Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones, and Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer were among those who joined the photo.

Lib Dem MP Vikki Slade, who took part in the photocall, later posted the image on Blue Sky, writing: “Pleased to join colleagues cross party today in support of UK MPs deported from Israel for speaking out.

“I then asked the minister whether this was a new tactic by the Israeli govt to “cow” ministers into not challenging them for their actions.”

Image via Yuan Yang

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward
Half of Brits back retaliation as Trump’s tariffs strain US-UK relations
8 April, 2025
 
67% of the public are worried about the Trump tariffs worsening the cost-of-living and stifling UK economic growth     

 

More than half (51%) of Brits think the government should retaliate with tariffs on imports from the US, in response to Donald Trump’s 10% tariffs on UK goods and 25% tariffs on steel, aluminium, and cars.

The government has yet to announce retaliatory tariffs, but trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds is currently consulting with UK businesses on potential measures.

Polling by More in Common has revealed that two-thirds of the public are now worried about Trump’s tariffs, while less than half (43%) of Brits now think of the US as an ally to the UK.

In good news for Starmer, 45% of Brits say the PM is ‘somewhat’ or ‘almost entirely’ responsible for securing the lower 10% tariff for the UK, compared to the 20% imposed on the EU.

Around a third of voters (34%) think that the UK’s lower tariff was a benefit of Brexit but do not think it makes the decision to leave worth it overall, while 23% see it as a Brexit benefit and think leaving was worth it.

With regard to potential concessions in return for lower tariffs, 67% of Brits either strongly or somewhat oppose allowing American companies to import chlorinated chicken into the UK.

Half of Brits would also oppose a peace agreement in Ukraine that grants Russia control over parts of Ukraine in exchange for reduced tariffs.

Director of More in Common, Luke Tryl, said: “The comparatively low tariff on UK imports may have evoked sighs of relief in Westminster, but it has done little to ease the public’s sense of concern.”

However, he said: “Most want to see the government stand up to the US”.

Tryl added: “For many Britons, ‘Liberation Day’ threatens to further deteriorate the already strained relationship between our two countries.

“If there is a silver lining, it’s that the public finally feel they are seeing a dividend of Brexit – most Britons – including remain voters – think that the lower tariff is a benefit of leaving the EU.”

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward
Petition to protect UK food standards against chlorinated chicken hits 60,000 signatures


9 April, 2025

The Tories and Reform UK are willing to water down UK food standards for a trade deal with the US





A petition opposing the weakening of the UK’s food and animal welfare standards has gained nearly 60,000 signatures in a single day.

The petition, launched by 38 Degrees yesterday, is urging the government to “Say no to chlorinated chicken here in the UK!”.

This comes after comments made by Donald Trump, who suggested that the UK should buy chlorinated chicken and hormone-injected beef from the US in exchange for lower tariffs on UK imports.

Campaign group 38 Degrees has condemned the idea, stating: “Trump wants us to swallow chlorine-washed chicken in exchange for tariff relief — food so filthy it needs disinfecting before it’s safe to eat.

“Allowing our supermarkets to be flooded with cheap, low quality American food would undercut British farmers and could trash animal welfare. Our food and animal welfare standards aren’t for sale to the highest bidder.”

The Treasury secretary James Murray has confirmed that chlorinated chicken ‘will remain illegal in the UK’ under Labour.

However, Reform UK and the Tories have indicated they would sell out on UK food standards to get closer to the US.

Kemi Badenoch argued that the idea that the US washes most chicken carcasses in chlorine water is a “myth”, despite it being commonly used to remove bacteria.

Nigel Farage said he would allow chlorinated chicken to be sold in the UK in return for a trade deal with the US.

Last week, Reform MP Lee Anderson declared he would eat chlorinated chicken. In addition, he shared a post on X, pointing out that salad is also washed with chlorine and that people can choose not to buy chlorine-washed chicken.

He said: “This is the type of chlorine washed salad eaten every day by millions of people in the UK. Yet there is outrage over chlorinated chicken. Simple solution – just don’t buy it. It’s not that complicated.”

In response, Tim Farron, the Lib Dem’s rural affairs spokesperson, said: “This is a useful reminder that Reform are the enemy of UK farmers. US chicken is chlorinated to compensate for the hygiene risk to humans from poor animal welfare standards.

“To welcome such products into the UK is to throw British farmers under the bus to appease Trump.”

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward