Monday, May 12, 2025

 

First five years of a child’s life provide a critical window of opportunity for preventing overweight and obesity, Dutch study suggests




European Association for the Study of Obesity




The first five years of a child’s life may be key to preventing overweight and obesity in years to come, say the authors of new research being presented at year’s European Congress on Obesity (ECO 2025).

The study found that a child’s body mass index (BMI) at the age of six is a better predictor of their risk of overweight or obesity at age 18 than their BMI at other points in their childhood.

Every one-unit increase in BMI at age six more than doubled (2.35 times) a child’s odds of being overweight or obese at 18. (BMI was adjusted for age and sex.)

The study also found that if a child with a higher BMI reached a healthier weight before the age of six, they were no longer at a higher risk of living with overweight or obesity in their late teens.

However, if they returned to a healthier BMI when they were six or older, they were still at higher risk of overweight and obesity.

This suggests that the first five years of a child’s life provide a critical window of opportunity for preventing overweight and obesity in young adulthood, says Jasmin de Groot, of Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Ms de Groot and colleagues used data from an ongoing prospective cohort study1 in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, to track the BMI trajectories of thousands of children in the Netherlands.

Weight at birth (adjusted for gestational age and sex) and BMI at age two, six, ten, 14 and 18 years was available for 3,528 participants, 52.9% of which were female.

A child’s BMI generally increases with age. For this reason, the researchers used reductions at the rate in which BMI was increasing (i.e. a BMI that was growing more slowly) as an indicator of healthy growth – and of reaching a healthier weight – rather than a reduction in BMI.

Some 32.3%, 22.3%, 24.7% and 20.6% of the 3,528 children lived with overweight or obesity at the ages of 2, 6, 10 and 14 years, respectively.

Many of these children were still in the overweight or obese range at the age of 18. Of the children with overweight or obesity at the ages of 2, 6, 10 and 14 years, 32.5%, 53.9%, 57.2%, and 70.3%, respectively, still lived with overweight or obesity at 18 years.

A higher BMI at any point in childhood, regardless of earlier BMI, was associated with a higher chance of overweight or obesity at 18 years.

A high BMI at the age of six was particularly strongly associated with overweight and obesity at 18.

However, when the researchers split each age group into three groups based on their BMI, they found that if a child in the group with the highest BMI slowed down the growth of their BMI before the age of six, their odds of living with overweight or obesity at 18 were similar to those of a child with a stable, average BMI.

Reaching a healthier weight after the age of six did not have the same effect: the children with the highest BMIs were more likely to live with overweight or obesity aged 18 regardless of how their BMI changed from the age of six onwards.

The findings, say the researchers, emphasise the importance of monitoring BMI in early childhood.

Ms de Groot adds: “We need to understand how children grow and develop if we are to help future generations grow up healthier and give every child a chance at a happy, healthy life.

“Our research assists with this by showing that a child with overweight or obesity isn’t destined to live with overweight or obesity as a young adult – and that the first five years of a child’s life provide a fantastic opportunity to intervene and prevent them experiencing overweight and obesity in the years to come.”

 

Failure to focus on covid suppression led to avoidable UK deaths, says expert



UK approach raises questions about medical and scientific advice



BMJ Group





Early in the covid-19 pandemic, the failure of UK government advisers to follow World Health Organization (WHO) advice and emerging evidence from East Asia that suppression could bring the virus under control quickly led to avoidable UK deaths, argues an expert in The BMJ today.

Suppression aims to avoid national lockdowns and maintain economic activity for most of the population by introducing surveillance systems to bring new outbreaks under control quickly, thus reducing the reproductive rate of infection (R0) to below 1 and causing the epidemic to wither.

Anthony Costello, professor of global health at University College London says, had the UK followed a suppression strategy, it might have prevented thousands of deaths. He asks why long term strategies of suppression continue to be under-recognised and calls for better governance of UK pandemic science advice.

In January 2020 the global threat from covid-19 was clear and the WHO was advising countries to focus on rapid suppression to avoid immediate threat from the spread of the new coronavirus, he explains.

Yet while Greece, Germany, Norway, and Ireland took steps to follow these recommendations, the UK government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) unanimously chose a response based on pandemic flu that ignored the different characteristics of coronavirus transmission.

Nor did SAGE change its advice after reports of rapidly falling cases and infection rates in several East Asian countries that had focused on suppression. Instead, in March 2020, the government published its “contain, delay, research, mitigate” plan based on influenza that would allow the virus to spread to achieve “herd immunity.”

SAGE’s unwavering decision to recommend a response based on influenza has continued to be defended by its co-chairs, Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, and Patrick Vallance, chief scientific adviser until 2023, notes Costello. Yet their defence is based on three arguably mistaken assumptions: that covid could not have been suppressed, that a huge second wave could follow even if it was, and that suppression required prolonged national lockdowns.

He acknowledges that SAGE faced a difficult and fast changing situation in early 2020 but says its advice to government was “flawed” and “arose from systems failure.”

For instance, SAGE did not recommend rapid expansion of testing, form plans to mobilise community health workers as contact tracers at scale to hotspot areas and across district health protection teams, or advise on key financial and support measures for effective self-isolation, he writes.

“Had the UK followed the same strategy and achieved the same excess cumulative death rate by March 2024 as South Korea, 69 instead of 344 deaths per 100,000, it might have prevented up to 180,000 UK deaths.”

The BMJ asked Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance why they had not recommended a suppression response, given WHO advice and emerging evidence early in the pandemic; about SAGE’s lack of independent experts; why they were not more outspoken about health harming policies; and whether they stand by the recommendations they made not to focus on suppression, but had not received a response by the time of publication.

Costello points out that, five years on, many of the people who developed the UK’s flawed response are still in post; they have not changed their views on suppression, and little has been done to improve government pandemic advice committees or to introduce detailed governance rules for the UK’s future pandemic response and resilience. 

“The covid inquiry and the UK medical establishment should properly critique this public health failure,” he concludes.

[Ends]

 

Can the U.S. develop a strong national science diplomacy strategy?


Summary author: Zachary Graber


American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)




In a new editorial in the AAAS publication Science & Diplomacy, Kimberly Montgomery, Director of International Affairs and Science Diplomacy at AAAS, reflects on whether the United States should develop a national science diplomacy strategy amid significant change to U.S. federal policy. Montgomery believes that the Trump administration should develop such a strategy – to help define a vision and direction for the U.S. It should outline how related policies “can advance U.S. diplomatic objectives, including fostering economic growth,” she writes. “And that strategy should detail how it will work with the private sector.” But for this to happen effectively, says Montgomery, the U.S. needs a stable and flourishing scientific ecosystem. She highlights challenges – including budget cuts for domestic science research, the firing of thousands of U.S. federal scientists, and the steep reduction of foreign aid that supports collaborative science projects abroad. “I am an optimist,” writes Montgomery, “but I am very concerned by the enactment of policies that harm the U.S. scientific ecosystem and damage our relationships with our allies.” Montgomery concludes: “Without changing course, I fear the question I will start being asked is not whether I agree with the diplomatic objectives that the Trump administration is pursuing…but rather whether the United States can develop a strong national science diplomacy strategy at all.”

 

Improving typhoon intensity forecasting and enhancing climate change prediction accuracy



Associate Professor Iwano and team receive MEXT Award for Science and Technology




Okayama University of Science

Associate Professor Iwano and His Team Receive 2025 MEXT Award for Science and Technology 

image: 

Associate Professor Koji Iwano and his research team at Okayama University of Science received the 2025 MEXT Award for Science and Technology (Research Category). The award recognizes their pioneering work in measuring air-sea momentum, heat, and CO₂ transfers under typhoon conditions—contributing to improved accuracy in typhoon intensity forecasting and climate change prediction.

view more 

Credit: Okayama University of Science




On April 15, 2025, Associate Professor Koji Iwano from the Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Okayama University of Science, along with his research collaborators, received the 2025 MEXT Award for Science and Technology (Research Category), presented by Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Their research enabled high-precision measurements of momentum (friction), heat, and CO₂ transfer across the air-see interface, which are closely linked to typhoon intensity and global warming. Notably, it marks the first successful modeling of how these transport phenomena correlate with wind speed and wave morphology under extreme wind conditions.

The study, titled "Investigation of Momentum, Heat, and CO₂ Transport Mechanisms at the Air-Sea Interface Under Typhoon Conditions," was conducted in collaboration with Professor Naohisa Takagaki of the Graduate School of Engineering at the University of Hyogo and Professor Emeritus Satoru Komori of Kyoto University.

According to Associate Professor Iwano, accurately predicting typhoon tracks and maximum wind speeds using global coupled atmosphere-ocean models is essential for developing effective disaster mitigation strategies. However, existing models have lacked clarity in representing air-sea momentum and heat exchange under extreme wind conditions. To bridge this gap, the research team designed and built Japan’s only large-scale indoor typhoon simulation tank, capable of simulating intense, wave-breaking ocean surfaces by generating airflow across the water surface at speeds equivalent to 70 m/s—comparable to a severe typhoon.

Using this facility, the team achieved unprecedented precision in measuring the transfer of momentum, heat, and CO₂ across the air-sea interface, effectively capturing interactions between the airflow and water flow under extreme conditions. Their findings revealed a regime shift at a threshold wind speed of 30 m/s: momentum transfer coefficients, which increase steadily at lower wind speeds and plateau at higher speeds; conversely, heat transfer coefficients, relatively stable at lower wind speeds, increase sharply under higher wind conditions.

These discoveries are expected to contribute to improving accuracy in typhoon intensity forecasts and the development of innovative typhoon control strategies, including potential methods involving artificial intervention to ocean surface conditions.

Commenting on the award, Associate Professor Iwano stated:

“It is a tremendous honor to receive this prestigious recognition. This award acknowledges the outcomes of our indoor experimental research using a large-scale simulation tank. All of us on the research team are sincerely grateful that the significance and value of this work have been recognized—especially at a time when large-scale experimental research is no longer mainstream. I also wish to express my heartfelt thanks to everyone who supported this project. Moving forward, we will continue to advance this research and use these experiments as a platform to foster the next generation of scientists.”

 

New technology promises to make display screens cheaper, brighter and more environmentally friendly




University of Surrey
University of Surrey's MMT 

image: 

The University of Surrey's MMT

view more 

Credit: University of Surrey




A radical new approach to display screen technology could halve production costs, reduce harmful waste, and deliver brighter, more energy-efficient screens for our smartphones, smartwatches, and even certain medical devices, say researchers at the University of Surrey. 

Most display screens use complex circuits made up of tiny switches called thin-film transistors (TFTs), which control when each pixel turns on or off and how bright it should be. However, building these circuits requires a lot of time, energy, water and harsh chemicals, making the manufacturing process expensive and resource-heavy. 

At this year’s Display Week 2025 Technical Symposium in San Jose, California (11-16 May), Dr Radu Sporea and Dr Eva Bestelink will unveil their latest research, based on a new type of electronic component called a multimodal transistor (MMT). Originally designed as a hardware AI computing element, the MMT also has the ability to simplify display circuits while improving performance and sustainability. 

Dr Radu Sporea, Associate Professor in Semiconductor Devices at the University of Surrey, said: 

“Our invention challenges decades of industry practice by embracing properties usually seen as flaws. In most displays, engineers try to eliminate the energy barriers that form where metals meet semiconductors because they restrict current flow. But instead of working around them, we’ve made those barriers central to how our transistors operate. 

“Using these effects deliberately, we’ve shown that the electronic circuits at the heart of display screens can be made with fewer components and processing steps – reducing waste, cutting costs and improving performance. And because it works with existing materials and tools, it’s a smarter, more sustainable upgrade for the screens we use every day. For the user, the reduced power requirements in operation will also mean significantly improved battery life.” 

The MMT’s unique operation enables extremely compact, high-performance circuits that are particularly well suited to devices where size, energy use and image quality are critical – such as smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, automotive displays, and future wearable devices.  

The technology is already showing promise in simulations, with real-world applications in AMOLED and microLED displays - two of the most advanced and rapidly growing areas of screen technology. It can also be integrated into current production lines with minimal disruption. 

Dr Eva Bestelink, Senior Research Fellow at the University of Surrey’s Advanced Technology Institute, said: 

“I’ve been working on this technology since my undergraduate days at Surrey, where I had the idea to develop a transistor based on neural behaviour, so seeing it evolve into something with real-world potential is incredibly rewarding. We’ve shown that it’s possible to rethink how displays are built without starting from scratch.  

“The MMT lets us design circuits that perform better while also being cleaner and cheaper to make. That’s a win for manufacturers, a win for users and a win for the environment. Beyond displays, it could also have major applications in areas like microfluidics, imaging arrays and hardware AI. We’re still actively researching the AI potential, but the implication for revolutionising manufacturing is clear – especially if we’re to achieve Net Zero.” 

Dr Bestelink and Dr Sporea will present their research on 15 and 16 May at this year’s Display Week 2025 Technical Symposium in San Jose, California. Their invention – the multimodal transistor (MMT), now granted a US patent – builds on more than two decades of pioneering research in thin-film electronics at the University of Surrey. 

[ENDS] 

Notes to editors 

  • Find out more about Display Week 2025 Technical Symposium here

 

New survey shows privacy and safety tops list of parental concerns about screen time



The Kids Mental Health Foundation offers free tools to help protect kids against screen-time risks


Nationwide Children's Hospital

New survey identifies parents' biggest fears about kids and online dangers 

video: 

A survey from The Kids Mental Health Foundation identifies parents’ greatest fears for their children around screen time, and what the experts say adults can do about it.  

view more 

Credit: The Kids Mental Health Foundation

 



COLUMBUS, Ohio - As kids spend more time on screens, a new national survey conducted by Ipsos on behalf of The Kids Mental Health Foundation, founded by Nationwide Children’s Hospital, identifies parents’ greatest fears for their children around screen time.

The top three fears parents have around their child and screen time are: privacy and safety concerns (47%), exposure to misinformation (36%) and not socializing in person (34%). Fewer parents ranked concerns around body image and schoolwork high on their list.

“My biggest concerns with screens are making sure that my kids don't get exposed to things before I'm ready for them to and making sure that people aren't trying to contact them,” said Xia Chekwa, a mom of three kids in Columbus, Ohio. “They're aware that not everywhere is a safe place, not everything is a safe thing to watch.”

Eight in 10 parents say they actively do something to manage the screen time of kids. Parents who set screen-time boundaries say setting time limits works the best (58%), followed by encouraging offline hobbies (53%) and using parental control apps (34%).

“When it comes to screen time, we can't expect kids to set their own limits and boundaries. because this technology is made to keep us using it,” said Ariana Hoet, PhD, executive clinical director of The Kids Mental Health Foundation and a pediatric psychologist at Nationwide Children’s. “As parents, we have to pay attention to how much they are using technology – what they are consuming on it, what are they doing with it, and who are they interacting with through various platforms of games or social media.” 

The Kids Mental Health Foundation offers free, evidence-informed resources to help parents understand how to set healthy screen time boundaries and understand how phones, tablets, computers and more impact the mental health and well-being of kids.

Dr. Hoet says having conversations with kids about technology and screen time is key.

Sit with them, watch how they use it, ask them questions, be engaged,” said Dr. Hoet. “And not only does that help your child feel like, oh, you're interested in me and what I'm doing, but it helps you learn as the parent or caregiver.”

Chekwa believes having a social media plan and setting healthy boundaries with technology now will help her oldest daughter in the future.

“Eventually, there's going to come a time when we're not there,” said Chekwa. “And we want to make sure that she knows, and she can decipher and use her intuition for herself and not just because mom and dad said so.”

During Mental Health Awareness Month, The Kids Mental Health Foundation has launched an initiative — Kids Mental Health Starts With Us — to empower adults across the United States to support children’s mental health and wellness with confidence. Kids Mental Health Starts With Us highlights the crucial role parents, caregivers, grandparents, educators, coaches and community members play in helping the children in their lives build mental wellness and resilience before mental health concerns arise. For more information and free kids’ mental health resources, please visit KidsMentalHealthFoundation.org.

 

Survey Methodology

This survey was conducted online within the United States by Ipsos on the KnowledgePanel® from April 4 to 6, 2025. This poll is based on a nationally representative probability sample of 1,085 adult parents of children under the age of 18. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level, for results based on the entire sample of adults. The margin of sampling error takes into account the design effect, which was 1.14. For complete survey methodology, including weighting variables and subgroup sample sizes, please contact: christopher.moessner@ipsos.com.

The Kids Mental Health Foundation is the leading organization promoting mental health for children in the United States. To achieve its vision to build a world where mental health is a vital part of every child’s upbringing, nearly 1,000 mental health professionals and researchers at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, in partnership with other trusted experts, provide real-world knowledge and expertise to power the Foundation's free educational videos, guides and curriculum. To date, more than 24 million people have engaged with the Foundation’s materials, helping parents, educators and coaches be a guiding force for children all across the United States. During Mental Health Awareness Month in May, The Kids Mental Health Foundation is shining a spotlight on how “Kids Mental Health Starts with Us” and ways its free tools and resources can help empower parents, teachers and coaches across the United States.