Showing posts sorted by date for query WATER IS LIFE. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query WATER IS LIFE. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, March 02, 2026

Source: Waging Nonviolence

As a senior, I’m trying to do my part to push back against the daily dismantling of the nation by the Trump administration. And I’m not alone.

Around 25 percent of adults in the United States are seniors. We are a powerful demographic for reclaiming and restoring democracy in this country. We want to build upon the 250 years of its existence and support its return to a position of international leadership.

In my 85 years as a citizen of the U.S., I’ve done my best to be a good one. Never shy to engage with worthwhile causes, I have been involved with disability rights, vocational rehabilitation, special education, domestic violence prevention and rehabbing offenders, senior services, youth services, food and water security, and immigrant and minority rights. I have tried to advance justice in the U.S., and some 16 plus other nations in which I have worked. Yet, since 2016, my pride in my own government has waned precipitously.

I now live in a senior independent living facility with some 50 other seniors. We are often willing to overlook our increasing infirmities and dwindling resources to engage with passion and determination. We take great pride in having a positive influence on our children — both biological and otherwise — by teaching them our values and how to uphold them.

I have scores of senior friends and family members — some are more physically capable, but many have limited mobility or are even homebound. However, all of them are engaging in civil resistance in meaningful ways. I’ve learned from them that there are many opportunities for peaceful engagement in the resistance.

Those with limited mobility are posting and commenting on social media. Those with economic means are donating to progressive candidates. Many are phone banking and writing postcards to voters and potential voters with groups like Seniors Taking Action. Others boycott businesses that support the current administration, write letters to the editor and call in to radio talk shows.

I’ve seen many seniors (and non-seniors) with canes, walkers and wheelchairs at all of the protest events I have attended. At one demonstration, an elderly, disabled fellow showed up in a wheelchair equipped with hydraulic lifts that put him at eye level with the other protesters. He was not only able to see what others saw, but others saw him, his sign and his strength as a demonstrator with the same passion and potency.

I have a friend who turns 100 later this year and uses a walker to travel any distance from our communal residence. She is one of my role models, and has taught me how to maximize my presence and impact at large demonstrations. Last summer, she made careful preparations for the No Kings protest, which was planned at the federal building located roughly a mile from our home. Before the event, she made two round-trip trial runs to build stamina and reassure herself it was doable.

When I arrived at the protest, she had already strategically placed herself where her homemade sign could be seen and she could see, hear and engage fully with the activities. At a subsequent event, with yet another sign, she was one of several League of Women Voters who sported a banner extolling their values. My friend is a firebrand who never misses an opportunity to participate.

Another friend in her mid-70s has been totally blind since early childhood. She marches in most if not all demonstrations in her area. She religiously contacts her elected officials at both the federal and state levels, expressing her appreciation for deeds well done, dismay for bad moves, and suggestions or demands for more effective action. As a Latina woman who grew up in a poor neighborhood in El Paso, the child of a single mother and sister to four younger siblings, her life experience and upbringing has taught her the importance of advocating for herself and for others. With ICE violating the rights of so many minority folks right now, she is standing up in both English and Spanish, and making sure she is heard loud and clear.

My spouse, Stan Coleman, a director, actor, vocalist and pianist, directed a local theater production of the 1936 play “It Can’t Happen Here,” based on the novel by Nobel Prize-winning author, Sinclair Lewis. The performances opened the audience’s eyes to the existential threat Trump and his followers pose to our way of life.

Other seniors have engaged in the boycotts of Target, Disney and ABC, as well as Tesla Takedown. Other elders are leaning on their alma maters to support critical issues like student organizing and protesting, avoiding campus repression, standing up for immigrant student rights, and refusing to buy into the authoritarianism of Trump’s campus compact. Since schools depend on alumni for financial support, especially through legacies, seniors are leveraging their position as potential donors to shore up their colleges’ willingness to defy Trump’s efforts at coercion and control.

As part of our resistance, my spouse and I have chosen to be active founders and members of the local chapter of States Win, formerly known as Sister District Project. This national effort works to support key state-level candidates for office through marches, bar trivia fundraisers and direct donations. Seniors make up more than 50 percent of our chapter. Additionally, our queer, senior walking group (called the “Talkie-Walkies” because we do more talking than walking) frequently sits for hours in front of our main library here in Eugene, Oregon, inviting passersby to register to vote.

Two of the founders of our States Win chapter, both women in their mid-to-late 70s, regularly travel to the home area of the candidates we are supporting and spend days knocking on doors to promote them. They report few negative reactions to their presentations. Could their age or the fact that they are seniors — and have expended considerable effort and expense to do what they are doing — be a factor in this positive reception? SDP’s impact nationally has been formidable: We helped flip both Virginia and Washington State from red to blue trifectas, where all three branches of the state government are now dominated by Democrats.

Making donations is one advocacy activity many seniors can do with little effort. Almost every person I know participates as a donor, in small or large amounts, often as just one way they engage in political activism. My spouse and I have developed a profile for those we support: We look at their platform and what in their history informs it; how they have performed in other political positions, in advocacy groups and in movements; how they have overcome difficulties to be successful; their support for minority rights; and their passion for all of the above.

Phone banking has been shown to be effective in swaying non-voters and regular voters to vote for progressive candidates. It is an activity one can do from home with proven impact. Many, many of my elderly friends participate. Writing postcards can be a solo act from the comfort of one’s kitchen table or a social event with a group of like-minded activists. Seniors might be the largest demographic engaged with postcard writing. One friend, in particular, has handwritten over 1,000 postcards in the past two years.

Signing petitions, joining and supporting advocacy groups such as Southern Poverty Law Center, Amnesty International and the ACLU, door-to-door canvassing, writing letters and emailing, are all methods of civil, peaceful resistance that countless seniors are involved in.

Additionally, with isolation being associated with dementia, the social value of many of these activities can be meaningful. Being with others builds awareness and commitment, both of which foster mental health, along with civil resistance. In Eugene, many of us gather at a store called Materials Exchange Center for Community Arts, or MECCA, where people make signs using both new and used materials, and share ideas with others of similar persuasion. My 84-year-old supper tablemate never fails to show up at a demonstration with a new and clever sign she created at MECCA. Folks often photograph her with her sign.

Importantly, all of these resistance efforts are nonviolent, which has been shown to be the most effective way of waging struggle. Trust us on this. Not only have seniors lived long enough to know what works, the book “Civil Resistance: What Everybody Needs to Know”proves it. Erica Chenoweth demonstrates that nonviolent movements have succeeded twice as often as violent ones over the last century. Along with my fellow senior activists, I often attend Chenoweth’s webinars with the Ash Center at Harvard University.

The activism carried out by our nation’s elders is laudable and extensive. Attend any rally, march, protest and look at the amount of white hair in the rising sea of protesters. Today’s seniors are not sitting at home knitting sweaters for our grandkids or pasting memory photos in albums. Nope, we are out there pushing back and fighting for a far better gift for them: We are assuring a future where we have a fully restored and improved democracy.

Don’t mess with seniors!\\\Email

Bill Winkley has worked as a teacher, rehab counselor, administrator and consultant in non-profit management. He has lived and worked extensively around the world. Today he coordinates the work of One Family International in developing nations from his home in a senior independent lives facility in Eugene, Oregon.




Is Artificial Intelligence in Charge of Nuclear Weapons?


 March 2, 2026

A large mushroom cloud over waterAI-generated content may be incorrect.

US nuclear bomb exploding over Micronesia, 1946. Public Domain.

On October 16, 2025, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution demanding that as long as nuclear weapons exist, they should never be controlled by artificial intelligence (AI). Six states proposed the AI resolution: Austria, El Salvador, Kazakhstan, Kiribati, Malta and Mexico. They were rightly convinced that AI should not be part of nuclear armaments.

AI risks and dangers

The UN resolution highlighted and explained the “risks” of incorporating AI in command, control and communications affecting nuclear weapons. It warned that

“artificial intelligence-driven decision-

making related to command, control and communications systems of nuclear weapons could reduce human control and oversight, increasing the possibility of induced distortions in decision-making environments and shortened action and response windows, particularly when related to the most sensitive and critical stages such as decision to launch, which could heighten the risk of accidental, unintended or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons.”

The resolution also highlighted “inherent technical limitations of artificial intelligence systems, including but not limited to the potential for malfunction, exploitation or intrusion, and cognitive and automation biases impacting training data and algorithmic design.” These technical deficiencies, the resolution said, “could produce hallucinations and flawed, inaccurate or misleading outputs and understandings, which in turn could have serious and catastrophic outcomes such as the accidental, unintended or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons.”

These are not minor problems afflicting AI. They could lead to nuclear catastrophe or nuclear war. For these legitimate concerns, the resolution demanded that, “pending the total elimination of nuclear weapons, human control and oversight is maintained over command, control and communications systems of nuclear weapons, including those that integrate artificial intelligence technology.”

“The resolution is a major steppingstone,” says the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, “because it nudges the debate beyond the baseline notion of “keeping humans in control of nuclear weapons decisions” towards a more fine-grained recognition of how AI could fuel unintended escalation in decision processes…. Substantively, the text [of the UN resolution] reflects and attempts to build on, political commitments that several states—such as France, China, Pakistan, the United Kingdom and the United States—have already endorsed in statements or in outcome documents in other forums. At the same time, it attempts to extend these commitments to nuclear command, control, and communications more broadly, namely the whole architecture that underpins nuclear decision-making.”

True, the resolution reflects the ideology, politics and terror of the decades-old existence of nuclear weapons, as well as the hubris of the nuclear states. However, the resolution goes far deeper. It is a serious first step for the eventual abolition of nuclear weapons. It reminds civilized people that AI and especially nuclear bombs, in combination or alone, are inhuman nightmares of possible forthcoming destruction of people and civilization and nature. Artificial Intelligence may seem harmless and profitable but, like nuclear bombs, it is becoming another version of nuclear bomb. “Like nuclear bombs, AI-machines are bound to explode. Money and profits laces the talk of engineering experts constructing AI machines. It is deceptive and dangerous.” Artificial intelligence is pervasive in its long-term transformation of its own high-tech military creators into beasts of burden that will forever regret their games of playing god – exactly the outcome of bringing into existence death itself in the form of nuclear weapons. In fact AI and nuclear bombs are sister products of the schizophrenic mind of war and warmongers. They are terrible weapons of desolation and death.

No past human society before the twentieth century had lived for decades with anthropogenic death machines. Not that past societies were gentler than societies of the twenty-first century. Wars and civil wars, from the civilized ancient Greeks to the world wars in Europe and America’s wars, hot and cold, in Latin America, Southeast Asia and the Middle East, are brutal ways of conflict resolution. Dialogue, understanding and justice are thrown out of the window. Then swords, knifes, bows and arrows, pistols, canons, machine guns, AI-powered drones, missiles and nuclear submarines take the fields of battle.

Wars are as old as humans. The Greek philosopher Herakleitos of the sixth century BCE said that war was the father and king of all. He is right. But bad as war was during the time of Herakleitos, now, twenty-seven centuries later, war is becoming the silent whisper and or the mayhem of extinction. That’s why AI and nuclear weapons, which together make extinction a certainty, must be abolished before they abolish us.

What is to be done?

The nuclear-weapons states (US, Russia, China, France, UK, Pakistan, India, North Korea and Israel) must explain to the world why they have those death machines. For national security? Doubtful. For prestige? Yes. For imperial games? Absolutely. For terrorizing non-nuclear states? Without a doubt.

We know that nuclear weapons cannot be used without unacceptable, nay death consequences for billions of humans. On June 10, 1963, President John F. Kennedy explained to the graduates of the American University that the explosive power of a single nuclear weapon was ten times more destructive than the explosions and destructions of all bombings of WWII. Kennedy’s dream was for world peace, which would automatically make nuclear weapons obsolete. He said, “world peace” was “the most important topic on earth.” He explained what he meant:

“What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children–not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women–not merely peace in our time but peace for all time.

“I speak of peace because of the new face of war. Total war makes no sense in an age when great powers can maintain large and relatively invulnerable nuclear forces and refuse to surrender without resort to those forces. It makes no sense in an age when a single nuclear weapon contains almost ten times the explosive force delivered by all the allied air forces in the Second World War. It makes no sense in an age when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried by wind and water and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and to generations yet unborn….

“I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war–and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

“Some say that it is useless to speak of world peace or world law or world disarmament–and that it will be useless until the leaders of the Soviet Union adopt a more enlightened attitude. I hope they do. I believe we can help them do it. But I also believe that we must reexamine our own attitude–as individuals and as a Nation–for our attitude is as essential as theirs. And every graduate of this school, every thoughtful citizen who despairs of war and wishes to bring peace, should begin by looking inward–by examining his own attitude toward the possibilities of peace, toward the Soviet Union, toward the course of the cold war and toward freedom and peace here at home.”

Probably President Kennedy was not the first politician who urged Americans to choose world peace instead of war and nuclear weapons. But his message for world peace is especially wise, timely and urgent now, in 2026, that AI is intruding in the control and command and communications affecting nuclear weapons. World peace means zero nuclear bombs and military artificial intelligence. Peace is the gift of freedom and civilization.

Nuclear weapons are useless for war. They are made by men intoxicated by war but clearly they don’t belong to civilized men on Earth.

The US, European Union (EU), Russia, China and India should form a pentarchy (rule of five) for the establishment of world peace and the abolition of nuclear weapons and military AI. These 5 great powers should replace the current UN Security Council. They should start their join oversight of the governance of the planet without doctrinal religious prejudices or fanaticism or authoritarianism. Neutral countries would preserve their culture and freedom but would be forbidden to encroach on their neighbors or other distant states. Second, the great powers ought to forbid the employment of AI in any military operation and, definitely, not in the management of nuclear weapons. Their top priority would be the abolition of nuclear bombs – their own stockpiles and those of other nuclear-weapons states, that is, Israel, United Kingdom. Pakistan, and North Korea. Together, they should guarantee existing borders among all states as well as their freedom and independence. That means the greatest number of states should become neutral like Austria or Switzerland. The pentarchy would guarantee the neutrality of all states, thus eliminating war.

In the case of the EU, it must first reorganize and become a real political union with inviolable borders and common defense. The new EU must understand that Germany is not a “normal” state. It was responsible for two world wars in Europe in the twentieth century. The EU should forbid Germany from ever having any armaments. Neutral Germany should also be obliged to pay the WWII debt to Greece as well as return the archaeological treasures German forces looted from occupied Greece, 1941-1944.

At the same time, the pentarchy should guarantee the independence and neutrality of Greece. It should also expel Turkish forces from occupied northern Cyprus and allow the Greek island of Cyprus to unite with Greece. All Cypriots (the Greek majority and the Moslem Turkish minority) should be asked about the union with Greece. Those of the Moslem faith, if they disapprove the union with Greece, ought to have the right to join Moslem Turkey.

Greece could return to its ancient Hellenic culture of science, justice, the good and the beautiful — and civilization. It could become a school of science and democracy, revived ancient Hellenic Olympics, philosophy, political theory, theater and peace. That was the dream of Alexander the Great and the first President of independent Greece, Ioannes Kapodistrias, 1776-1831.

Epilogue

Yet the current global political relations between the nuclear-weapons-armed states are full of tensions and fear. On October 28, 2024, General Anthony Cotton, commander of the US Strategic Command, expressed concern and antagonism toward the nuclear powers of the East. He described a “most complicated environment,” in which there were “emboldened autocrats who seek to dominate by force and fear. For the first time in our history, we confront two nuclear-near-peer adversaries.

Russia is bent on restoring its former policy of glory and rising China that seeks to replace a stable and open international system that has served the world well for over 80 years. Now I add to this an aggressive and nuclear-armed North Korea, and of course, Iran.

“China is rapidly expanding all aspects of military power, including land, sea, and air-based nuclear delivery systems.

The PRC is likely to have 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030 and is supporting Russia’s war on Ukraine. Russia already has the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal in the world, and continues to expand and modernize that arsenal. Moscow has dramatically expanded the percentage of its GDP devoted to the military and is clearly poised for a long war in Ukraine.

“North Korea continues to expand its nuclear arsenal in violation of UN Security Council resolutions, as well as its active support for Russia in Ukraine. Most recently, we see that North Korean troops are being deployed to Russia for further deployment to the Ukraine. And finally, Iran continues its aggression in the Middle East with support from Russia.”

There’s no doubt general Cotton reflects American ideology and strategic thinking. It’s possible the nuclear powers of the East are reaching similar conclusions about the nuclear powers of the West. No matter the real and imagined differences between these two camps, they need to get together and start a dialogue for peace and the steps necessary for the abolitions of their nuclear weapons. They should be able to work out agreements to guarantee the integrity of their borders.

The pentarchy should coordinate the transition from war, nuclear weapons and weaponized AI to disarmament, neutrality, peace and friendly relations among all nations. Only then, the nations of the world will be in a position to jointly fight planetary climate chaos, abandon fossil fuels and start the elimination of worldwide pollution.

Evaggelos Vallianatos, Ph.D., is a historian and ecological-political theorist. He studied zoology and history, Greek and European, at the University of Illinois and Wisconsin. He did postdoctoral studies in the history of science at Harvard. He worked on Capitol Hill and the US Environmental Protection Agency; taught at several universities, and authored hundreds of articles and several books, including Poison Spring (2014), The Antikythera Mechanism (2021), Freedom (2025) and Earth on Fire: Brewing Plagues and Climate Chaos in Our Backyards (World Scientific, 2026).

 

The Age of Human Arrogance, Part II


What on Earth Are We Doing? The Madness of Mining the Cosmos While Poisoning Our Only Home

Humanity stands at a strange and tragic crossroads. We boast of our intelligence, our innovation, our “progress,” yet we behave like a species determined to sabotage its own future. We tear open the earth for minerals, metals, and rare elements—lithium, cobalt, gold, copper—feeding an insatiable appetite for technology, weapons, and spectacle. We burn forests, poison rivers, and choke the atmosphere, all while congratulating ourselves for planning missions to Mars in search of water.

What kind of madness is this?

We are a civilization that contaminates the water beneath our feet while spending billions to search for droplets on distant planets. We destroy ecosystems that sustain life, then celebrate engineering triumphs that promise to help us escape the consequences of our destruction. We behave as if the universe owes us another home, another chance, another planet to plunder.

This is not progress. This is arrogance—pure, unfiltered, and catastrophic.

The Violence Hidden in Our Minerals

Every device we hold, every battery we charge, every rocket we launch is built on the backs of minerals extracted from wounded lands. The soil of the Congo, the deserts of Chile, the mountains of Bolivia, the forests of Indonesia—all bear the scars of our hunger for “advancement.” Children dig for cobalt. Rivers run red with tailings. Entire species vanish without ceremony.

And yet, we dare to call this “innovation.”

We have mastered the art of extracting everything except wisdom.

A Planet We Refuse to Share

The tragedy is not only environmental—it is moral. We cannot even share this earth with the species that preceded us. We bulldoze habitats, poison oceans, and drive animals to extinction, then marvel at the silence we created. We treat the natural world as an inconvenience, an obstacle to be cleared for profit, a resource to be consumed without restraint.

We forget that the earth is not ours alone. It never was.

The arrogance of believing that humanity is the center of creation has led us to a precipice. We have mistaken dominion for domination, stewardship for ownership, and intelligence for entitlement.

The Cosmic Distraction

While our oceans fill with plastic and our air thickens with toxins, we point telescopes toward distant galaxies and declare ourselves pioneers of the future. We dream of colonizing Mars while failing to protect the miracle of Earth. We fantasize about terraforming other planets while refusing to heal the one that already sustains us.

This is not exploration—it is escapism.

A species that cannot live in harmony with its own home has no moral right to seek another.

The Moral Question We Refuse to Ask

What does it mean to search for water on the moon while poisoning the rivers of Ghana, India, Brazil, and Flint, Michigan? What does it mean to dream of life on Mars while extinguishing life in our forests, wetlands, and coral reefs? What does it mean to call ourselves civilized while treating the earth as disposable?

The question is not scientific. It is spiritual. It is ethical. It is existential.

Humanity is not suffering from a lack of knowledge. We are suffering from a lack of humility.

A Call to Return to Earth

The future will not be saved by rockets, satellites, or interplanetary fantasies. It will be saved by a radical shift in consciousness—a return to reverence, restraint, and responsibility. We must learn again to live with the earth, not above it. To honor the ecosystems that sustain us. To recognize that every species, every river, every tree is part of a sacred web of life.

We must confront the truth: The greatest threat to humanity is not climate change, pollution, or extinction. The greatest threat is human arrogance.

Until we humble ourselves before the earth, no amount of technology will save us.

Sammy Attoh is a Human Rights Coordinator, poet, and public writer. A member of The Riverside Church in New York City and The New York State Chaplains Group, he advocates for spiritual renewal and systemic justice. Originally from Ghana, his work draws on ancestral wisdom to explore the sacred ties between people, planet, and posterity, grounding his public voice in a deep commitment to human dignity and global solidarity. Read other articles by Sammy.