Thursday, June 20, 2024

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Singapore faith leader jailed for swindling, abusing followers

A Singaporean faith leader was jailed for 10 years on Wednesday for swindling millions of dollars from her followers and using violent punishments to discipline those who disobeyed her, local media reported.

Woo May Hoe was sentenced to 10-and-a-half years in prison, according to Singapore-based Channel NewsAsia (CNA), a rare case of cult-like crime in the wealthy financial hub. 

Woo convinced some 30 followers into believing she was a deity and defrauded them of more than $10 million over several years, according to court documents.

Woo had told her followers that their payments would be used for getting rid of their “bad karma”.

They were told the funds were being sent to a spiritual figure in India called Sri Sakthi Narayani Amma or financing the construction of new temples, the court documents said. 

She punished followers if they disobeyed her by caning them, forcing them to eat faeces or pulling their teeth out with pliers.

Health officials found she had paranoid schizophrenia at the time of her offences but that she was aware of the illegal nature of her acts, according to CNA.

“The accused’s actions have completely shattered the lives of her followers, leaving them in dire financial circumstances and causing permanent physical disability to some,” the prosecutors said in their sentencing submissions to the court.

In 2020, Singapore police arrested 21 members of a local chapter of South Korea’s Shincheonji Church of Jesus (SCJ). 

They were detained for being members of an unlawful society. 

Under Singapore law, anyone convicted of being a member of an unlawful society can be jailed for up to three years as well as be fined up to $3,700.

TOYS FOR BOYS
Australian Military Demos Fractl Laser Weapon in Victoria


Fractl counter-UAS Directed Energy Weapon System. Photo: CPL Jacob Joseph/Australian Army

ROJOEF MANUEL
JUNE 19, 2024

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has tested its Fractl Portable High Energy Laser at the Puckapunyal Military Area in Victoria.

The Fractl is Canberra’s first directed energy weapon designed to neutralize aerial drones moving at 100 kilometers (62 miles) per hour.

Built and delivered by Melbourne-based industry partner AIM Defence, the capability fires a concentrated laser with “less than the amount of power it takes to boil a kettle” at the speed of light to burn through steel.

The suitcase-sized solution can localize threats as small as a 10-cent coin at 1,000 meters (3,280 feet) away.

The ADF wrote that the weapon is operated silently and motionlessly, adding that unfamiliar personnel can also learn the platform within minutes.

“You push a button to track the drone and the computer takes over, then you push another button to ‘pull the trigger’ just like a video game,” ADF Corporal Patrick Flanagan explained.

“With your index finger you can quickly change your aim between the drone’s video camera, centre mass or one of the propellers.

“It only takes seconds to knock out the camera and two or three seconds to disable the rotor.”   
Fractl counter-UAS Directed Energy Weapon System controller. Photo: CPL Jacob Joseph/Australian Army

Weapon With ‘Endless Magazine’


According to ADF, an additional Fractl test was conducted alongside armored teams to evaluate the weapon’s counter-unmanned aerial system (c-UAS) function before the Puckapunyal trial.

“They consumed a lot of ammunition and were hitting the target at very close range,” ADF Robotic and Autonomous Systems Warrant Officer 2 Eli Lea stated. “There was no margin for error.”

“Laser weapons essentially have an endless magazine as long as there’s power.”

“Modern fire control systems specifically designed to track and engage drones are what’s needed.”

Preparing for Advanced Threats

The ADF further highlighted the importance of the Fractl and similar anti-drone solutions to address the emergence of autonomous aircraft in modern warfare.

Fractl counter-UAS Directed Energy Weapon System. 
Photo: CPL Jacob Joseph/Australian Army

“Drones come in all shapes and sizes and you need a variety of tools to defeat the threat,” Lea said.

“Shooting small multi-rotor UAS out of the sky is particularly challenging. A directed-energy weapon that can detect, track and engage those types of targets is a part of that tool set.”

“The lessons from Ukraine are that drones are a genuine problem and if we don’t do anything about it, we’re going to get a rude awakening in the next fight.”

HERE BE THAT OLD HOODOO

As Zimbabwe’s economy collapses, traditional healers are selling wealth advice on TikTok

Locally known as sangomas, spiritual guides are gaining fame online, but they face criticism from their peers.


Emily Scherer for Rest of World

By CHRIS MURONZI
20 JUNE 2024 • HARARE, ZIMBABWE

As Zimbabwe’s economy worsens, traditional healers have built a business out of promising people wealth and financial freedom.
Many have moved their services online, predominantly on TikTok.
Critics argue that they exploit spirituality for profit, raising ethical concerns.

Sitting on a couch and speaking into her phone camera, Gogo Shumba carefully outlined step-by-step instructions: Take a 10-rand note — “the green one” — and a handful of salt. Dip it in water for three days. Then, dry out the note and keep it in your wallet.

“Your money problems will be taken care of,” she concluded.

Shumba, 36, was addressing viewers who had joined her TikTok livestream to learn how to get rich. The Zimbabwean traditional healer, or sangoma in the local dialect, has been giving spiritual advice on TikTok for nearly two years, and has around 31,000 followers on the Chinese social media platform.

Traditional healer from Zimbabwe makes people rich” has become a popular content category on TikTok, and Shumba is one of the many sangomas offering spiritual guidance and special prayers to their followers. While such services have been part of Zimbabwe’s culture for centuries, TikTok has helped traditional healers find a global audience. Some of their most active followers are from other African countries, as well as the U.S. and the U.K. As they advise people on TikTok about how to get rich, the platform has helped the sangomas improve their financial conditions. In their community, however, TikTok sangomas are often looked down upon and face opposition from more orthodox peers.

“We have seen that with Pentecostal church leaders and their use of radio and television. We have seen people flocking to those churches seeking fortune,” Oswelled Ureke, a senior lecturer of television studies and digital media production at the University of Johannesburg, told Rest of World. “There could be a connection between the difficulties that people face in life and their consultations of sangomas. But it might also be that it’s just for entertainment purposes.”
Traditional healer Shumba has been giving spiritual advice on TikTok for nearly two years. @sty2lis

The southern African country has been dealing with an economic crisis marked by hyperinflation, high unemployment, and rising poverty.

Lesley Chihera, a 29-year-old Harare-based hairdresser, started consulting sangomas on TikTok in 2020. She had lost her livelihood due to the pandemic lockdowns, and was unable to visit the prophets she had regularly consulted. Now, she follows a network of TikTok sangomas and is convinced that their counseling will help her overcome financial distress.

“Right now, I really need money and that is why I am on TikTok sessions,” Chihera told Rest of World. “God-willing and your vadzimu [family spirits] permitting, things can change for the better with help of TikTok sangomas.” Following the sangomas’ advice, she has dumped eggs and old currency notes in the middle of the road to ward off evil spirits, among other things.

For the healers, TikTok has been a financial boon. A sangoma charges anywhere between $80 and $300 for a consultation, depending on the service and the location of the client.

Tanya Chisu became a traditional healer in 2018. For the first few years, Chisu, now 21, struggled to find clients and relied almost exclusively on a few referrals. In October 2022, she joined TikTok to “learn more about spiritual things from other, more experienced healers,” she told Rest of World. Over time, Chisu developed a following of her own.

“Now I make more than $1,500 [in a month],” she said. “Sometimes $2,000 per month.” Money and fertility issues are the most popular topics for consultations. The income from TikTok has helped Chisu gain “financial freedom.” She is currently saving up to buy a car.

Sekuru Kanengo, a Harare-based sangoma, has nearly 1,900 followers on TikTok. He charges $200 per consultation from local clients, and $300 from international clients, according to an automated message from the WhatsApp number linked to his TikTok page.

“Spirituality and technology do not mix. They are like water and oil.”

Earlier this year, Sekuru Tasvu, a traditional healer who has around 430 followers on TikTok, was in the news for spending $30,000 on his lavish wedding. Tasvu charges between $80 and $300 per consultation, depending on the service, according to information on his WhatsApp profile.

But the Zimbabwe National Traditional Healers Association does not recognize the work of sangomas who offer services through TikTok, spokesperson Prince Mutandi told Rest of World.

“Most of these TikTok and social media sangomas are thieves masquerading as traditional healers,” Mutandi said. “Spirituality and technology do not mix. They are like water and oil.”

Grace Mhofela, a Harare-based entrepreneur who has consulted a sangoma on TikTok in the past, told Rest of World she found her to be “bogus.”

“All they demand after approaching them is money,” Mhofela said. “In my case, I had lost money to thieves … I had no money and one sangoma asked me to pay $200 to consult with her.”

Chisu dismissed the allegations, saying she and many others are “genuine” sangomas who are simply “comfortable using technology.”

“[Social media] gives a platform for the expression of things that would normally occur offline, and because of its affordances, it helps people from different walks of life to access the services of sangomas,” Ureke said. “Whereas, in offline spaces, they would have had to travel long distances to go and consult sangomas face-to-face.”
Chris Muronzi is a business and tech journalist based in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Who’s actually using Threads? Young protesters in Taiwan


Despite Meta’s promise to crack down on political content in the app, Taiwanese activists are using it to organize.


Photography by Shanshan Kao for Rest of World


By VIOLA ZHOU
24 MAY 2024

Meta’s Threads platform has become a new gathering space for young, progressive users in Taiwan.

During the ongoing protests in Taiwan, users are calling for participation and organizing supplies on Threads.

Meta’s promise to reduce political content on its platforms is causing concerns that users will lose nascent political communities.


As thousands of people gathered outside Taiwan’s legislature on Tuesday to protest against a bill that would give more power to China-friendly parties, Yuan, who was volunteering at a nearby church, noticed that the large crowd was running short on supplies.

He fired off posts on the Threads app listing items that protesters needed, such as snacks, bottled water, and plastic bags. Supplies arrived within minutes.

“My Threads page was like a wishing well,” Yuan, who requested to be identified with part of his first name for privacy reasons, told Rest of World. “We got everything we asked for.”

A 32-year-old bar owner in Taipei, Yuan has been lurking on Threads since Meta launched the Instagram-linked alternative to X last year. He posted on the app for the first time last weekend to help organize a protest against the island’s opposition lawmakers. His posts about the protests have been “liked” thousands of times.

Threads, which had 150 million monthly active users globally by April, is doing exceptionally well in Taiwan, where it’s commonly loosely transliterated as cui — because the “th” sound doesn’t appear in Mandarin. It works like X, allowing users to post 500-character-long text posts as well as audio, photos and short videos. Despite its small population of 23 million, Taiwan had 1.88 million active users on Threads from May 5 to 11, behind only the U.S., Japan, and Brazil, according to app-tracking site Data.ai.



Demonstrators at a protest outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei, Taiwan on May 24, 2024.

While young Taiwanese users discuss everything from relationships to celebrity gossip on Threads, the app has gradually become a gathering space for progressives, who favor independence from China to defend the island’s democracy. Despite Meta’s pledges to tame down political content on its platforms, Taiwanese users are flocking to Threads specifically for that purpose. Meta did not immediately respond to a Rest of World request for comment.

The Chinese government claims Taiwan to be its own territory, and has threatened to take it back by force. As President Lai Ching-te, with the independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), was inaugurated, opposition lawmakers from Kuomintang and the Taiwan People’s Party, which favor a more conciliatory stance towards China, pushed for a bill to increase the parliament’s oversight over the executive branch.


“It feels like we are starting fresh [on Threads].”

Young supporters of the DPP believe it to be an attempt to undermine the president’s power and Taiwan’s democracy. Thousands of people took to the streets this week, and many of them spread the news on Threads.

Chili Lee, a 32-year-old tattoo artist in Taipei, told Rest of World that she decided to join the protest on May 17 after seeing a Threads video showing a DPP lawmaker getting pushed off the legislature podium. When she joined the large demonstration on Tuesday, Lee checked Threads constantly for updates about where the crowd was moving. She read that the church Yuan was volunteering at was handing out food, and ended up getting a bowl of rice noodle soup. She shared a photo on Threads. “The ‘likes’ made me feel I had a duty to update internet users on what was happening,” Lee said. “I’m happy that I’m not alone in caring about politics.”
Chili Lee (right) and her husband Ken Lee joined the protests after seeing a video on Threads.

Protestors have been using a range of apps, including Facebook, Line, and Discord, to coordinate the leaderless protests, but many have found Threads to be the most effective in connecting with people outside their own social circles.

Singer Hana Hsu, who has used Threads to discuss politics since 2023, has been calling on the app’s users to join the protests since last weekend. During the demonstration, she informed fellow activists on Threads where they could confront China-leaning lawmakers. When she saw users posting they were joining alone, she connected them to others by tagging them together on Threads. “I hope no one is left by themselves,” Hsu told Rest of World.

Jason Liu, a former journalist who runs the popular podcast May I Ask, posted recordings from the protest scene, where people chanted slogans like “Defend democracy.” As a new platform, Liu told Rest of World, Threads is able to amplify the voices of ordinary users. “There is so much misinformation and fake accounts in Taiwan,” he said. “Everyone is looking for something real. Threads is proving to be doing just that.”

“The ‘likes’ made me feel I had a duty to update internet users on what was happening.”

X has never become mainstream in Taiwan. During the last major protest, the 2014 Sunflower Movement, student activists communicated through a mix of Facebook, local forums, and YouTube livestreams, participants told Rest of World.

But the youth have now found those platforms to be obsolete and too conservative. “It feels like we are starting fresh [on Threads],” Huang Tzu-ning, a 26-year-old education worker, told Rest of World. Huang, who began posting on the day of Taiwan’s presidential election, has been interacting with high school and university students about how to participate in politics. “Facebook no longer has these young groups.”

Katherine Chen, a communications professor at the National Chengchi University in Taiwan who also works on Meta’s Oversight Board, told Rest of World that Threads has created a bubble for young, progressive Taiwanese people, with less interference from older internet users and advertisements. The platform has created a new opportunity for the DPP to mobilize support, she said.
A demonstrator holds a meme mocking two opposition lawmakers, downloaded from Threads.

But freshly created political communities could be fragile as Meta promises to reduce the amount of political content users can see. Facebook began limiting political content in 2021, and Meta said this year that Instagram and Threads would also stop recommending political content, unless it came from accounts users were following. “Our goal is to preserve the ability for people to choose to interact with political content, while respecting each person’s appetite for it,” Meta’s head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, wrote on Threads in February.

Meta would likely focus on reducing political content in English to fend off criticisms from the U.S. public that it has been fueling polarization, according to Tama Leaver, a professor of internet studies at Curtin University in Australia. He told Rest of World that while the company might find the relatively civil discussions on Taiwan unalarming at the moment, rules could change. “It is entirely possible that Meta could flip the switch tomorrow, and visible and obvious political content could get significantly downplayed,” Leaver said.

Taiwanese users told Rest of World they worry how long Threads would be willing to host their activism. Huang, the education worker, called on users to add each other on messaging apps Line and Telegram, so people could stay in touch even if the algorithm on Threads stops promoting politics. That post got more than 2,300 likes.

“My worry is that the Taiwanese on our side rely too much on this place,” Huang said. “After all, this is a commercial platform run by the notorious Meta.”
Viola Zhou is a Rest of World Senior Reporter based in New York City.
Singapore doubles down on lab-grown meat as Silicon Valley backs off

Global funding in the cultured meat industry dropped by 75% in the last year. Singapore sees its chance to become a world leader, backing local and international firms.

By SANDY ONG
19 JUNE 2024 •
 SINGAPORE

Singapore is the only country where cultivated meat can be purchased in a shop.
Quick approvals and government support have lured several U.S., European cultivated meat firms.

High cost of production, scaling up, and consumer skepticism remain challenges.


Huber’s Butchery, in Singapore’s upscale Dempsey Hill neighborhood, has long drawn shoppers looking for more than just cold cuts. Starting last month, the deli’s freezer section has stocked shredded chicken grown from cells in a lab, the first time anywhere in the world that cultivated meat can be bought in a store, its manufacturer said.

Cultivated meat has been available at a handful of restaurants in Singapore and the U.S. for a couple of years. But the launch of Good Meat 3 — from California-based food technology firm Eat Just — at Huber’s is a high point for the industry that has been in the doldrums lately. Investor interest is flagging, and cultivated meat has been banned in Italy, and in the U.S. states of Alabama and Florida.

The retail launch “is more than a milestone for the company, it is also a milestone for the cultivated meat industry,” Josh Tetrick, Eat Just’s co-founder and chief executive, told Rest of World. The formulation of its new product uses just 3% cultivated chicken in order to sell at a lower price point so more people can try it, he said. “Singapore’s population has always demonstrated a remarkable openness to new technologies in food and elsewhere, making it the perfect marketplace for novel foods like cultivated meats.”


Instagram account hacked? “Ethical hackers” will get it back

Unlike plant-based meats that have become commonplace with brands such as Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, cultivated meat has struggled to get off the ground after an initial wave of enthusiasm.

The tissue-engineering techniques behind cultivated meat have long been used in making vaccines and drugs: Animal fat and tissue are grown in a lab from cells, then processed into a variety of proteins. The obvious advantages are that it needs less land and water to produce, and can lower greenhouse gas emissions. But cultivated meat is expensive to produce and hard to scale, and has struggled to hold investor interest.

The more than $3 billion put into cultivated meat worldwide over the last decade is a fraction of the investments in other technologies, such as renewable energy, which are also aimed at reducing emissions. “The biggest obstacle to cultivated meat reaching the masses … is the broad underinvestment in R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, especially from governments,” Mirte Gosker, managing director of the nonprofit Good Food Institute Asia Pacific, told Rest of World.

Singapore’s foray into alternative proteins began in earnest in March 2019, with its “30 by 30” vision to sustainably produce 30% of its nutritional needs locally by 2030 — up from 10%. Alternative protein is a key part of this plan. But its strategy “goes beyond simply meeting its own domestic needs,” said Gosker.

“The biggest obstacle to cultivated meat reaching the masses … is the broad underinvestment in R&D and manufacturing infrastructure.”

“As a small country with limited natural resources, Singapore cannot single-handedly feed the world,” she said. “But it can serve as the place where companies from all around the world come to work with top-tier research agencies and food-tech partners to refine their formulations, eliminate inefficiencies in their manufacturing process, and explore new techniques and ingredients that could help them drive down costs.”

Singapore was the first country to approve cultivated meat, with the nod for Eat Just’s chicken nuggets in December 2020. The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) recently greenlit Australia-based Vow’s cultivated quail for restaurants — the second company to receive a local license, and just the fourth globally. Later this year, SFA is expected to approve cultivated chicken and pork from French firm Vital Meat and Dutch company Meatable, respectively.

There are about a dozen local alternative-protein startups in the country, and some 15 from Europe, the U.S., South Korea, Israel, and Hong Kong. While investments in other countries may be larger, “one of Singapore’s greatest strengths is the tight-knit innovation community which facilitates seamless collaboration between startups, researchers, and government agencies,” Gosker said.

The government has so far committed some $230 million towards alternative proteins — from grants to training researchers to building capabilities in bioprocessing and other complementary technologies. Singapore “invested very heavily in getting technological expertise into its government regulatory departments,” Simon Eassom, chief executive of Food Frontier, an Australia-based think tank, told Rest of World. “That means it’s able to fast-track a lot of these applications safely.” Applications only take half, or a third, of the time to process, compared to Australia or the U.S., he said.

Singapore is the “perfect spot” for testing, George Peppou, co-founder and chief executive of Vow, told Rest of World. The speed of approvals is the “driving reason” why Vow launched its cultivated quail in Singapore, he said. “We have an application with the FDA, but we’re not intending to launch in the U.S. anytime soon … It’s a very expensive market to launch in, and now it’s so politically sensitive, it wouldn’t be worth the investment.”
A selection of cultivated seafood products from Singapore’s Umami Bioworks, prepared for a tasting event in October 2022. Umami Bioworks

The United States and Israel approved the sale of cultivated chicken and beef in June 2023 and January 2024, respectively. Australia and New Zealand are jointly assessing Vow’s cultivated quail for approval. China added cultivated meat to its five-year plan for food in 2022, while South Korea set up a regulatory framework for cultivated meat this year. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are also investing heavily.

Meanwhile, Singapore’s Islamic Religious Council declared cultivated meat halal earlier this year, expanding the potential consumer base in the multiethnic country. In April, state-backed sustainable food firm Nurasa opened a food innovation center that offers food-tech startups facilities such as 100-liter bioreactors to help produce at scale. Some of Eat Just’s Good Meat 3 was produced there.
EXPORTERSubscribe to our new weekly newsletter for the latest on U.S. tech giants and their impact outside the West. Be the first to get incisive analysis from Rest of World’s Russell Brandom, right to your inbox.

“Shared developmental resources like this can help solve specific problems in the value chain and bottlenecks that many companies share,” Mihir Pershad, who moved from the U.S. state of Maryland to Singapore, told Rest of World. Pershad’s Umami Bioworks, which makes cultivated seafood, has secured R&D grants and meetings with potential overseas customers through the Singapore government, he said.

Worldwide, there are nearly 200 cultivated meat companies. Although prices in the nascent industry have declined since the first lab-grown beef burger debuted in 2013 at a staggering $330,000, they still need to fall to under $10 per kilo — roughly a tenth of current costs — to be competitive in the mass market, estimates the Good Food Institute.

Cultivated meat may reach cost parity with conventional meat by 2030, with the market worth about $25 billion by then, according to McKinsey & Company. But investor interest has flagged: The industry raised just $226 million last year, a steep fall from $922 million in 2022, according to the Good Food Institute. Several Silicon Valley startups have collapsed or shelved expansion plans. Eat Just is also under pressure in the U.S.

Startups are also still finding investors: Cellivate Technologies, a Singapore company focused on cell-based solutions for the cultivated meat industry, recently beat out nearly two dozen startups in Southeast Asia to win a business reality TV show, with commitments of about $3 million from venture capital firms.

“There is much more work to be done to prove that cultivated meat can be made at large scale,” said Eat Just’s Tetrick. “[But] this year, we will sell more servings of cultivated chicken than have been sold in any year prior.” As for its newest product, Huber’s Butchery is “pretty much selling most of what is supplied to us,” Andre Huber, the executive director, told Rest of World. “Response has been great.”

Sandy Ong is an independent science and tech journalist based in Singapore.

Column: This GOP-leaning political polling firm has turned into a purveyor of anti-vaccine propaganda






















Business Columnist 
 Los Angeles Times.
June 19, 2024 

Rasmussen Reports used to be a fairly creditable and credible political polling organization, good enough to be included among the pollsters relied on by services such as FiveThirtyEight to give a broad-spectrum gauge of voter sentiment in the run-up to state and federal elections.

It’s true that Rasmussen had a detectable pro-Republican “house effect,” in polling parlance — but one that was consistent enough to compensate for in published polling averages.

But something has happened to Rasmussen in recent years. Not only have its results become more sharply partisan, favoring Republican and conservative politicians, but it also has increasingly promoted right-wing conspiracy theories on topics such as race relations, election results and — perhaps most troubling — COVID vaccines and COVID origins.

By random chance alone...there will be a large number of people who die within, say, 30 days of being vaccinated even if the vaccine has absolutely nothing to do with their deaths.

— Pseudoscience debunker David Gorski, MD

Earlier this month, Rasmussen tweeted the results of polls it conducted in June 2023 and last month, claiming to find that 1 in 5 Americans believe they know someone who died from a COVID vaccine.

There are many reasons to disregard any such poll asking people what they think about a scientifically validated fact — in this case, that the record shows overwhelmingly that the COVID vaccines widely used in the U.S. are safe and effective.

When was the last time you did something that profoundly changed your life? Volunteering is always impactful and there is a myriad of causes worthy of our time, but the act of aiding youth in foster care can be truly transformational – for both...

But Rasmussen has doubled down on its findings. In a series of tweets on June 9, it declared, first: “If the numbers implied by our COVID polling are correct, the vaccines killed more people worldwide than Jews killed in the Holocaust.”

Then it tweeted: “China lied. Fauci lied. People died.” And followed that with: “The government take over of medicine was as deadly as always predicted.”

In other words, Rassmussen has morphed from a quantifier of public opinion into a participant in the spread of noxious propaganda. It still tries to validate its results by claiming that they’re “relevant, timely and accurate,” citing its “track record.”

But that track record has been sprouting gray hairs. The most recent election polling cited by the web page documenting its track record is from 2010.



BUSINESS
Column: Two Rutgers professors are accused of poisoning the debate over COVID’s origins. Here’s why
March 20, 2024

More recently, 538, now owned by ABC News, dropped Rasmussen from its polling averages in March. ABC took that step after Rasmussen failed to respond suitably to a questionnaire 538 submitted asking Rasmussen to explicate its polling methodology. Rasmussen published ABC’s query on its website under the headline, “ABC News: ‘Answer Our Questions -- Or Else!’”

I asked Rasmussen Reports by phone and email to comment on its tweet and its polling, but received no response.

Rasmussen’s veer to the far right has been noticeable for several years. Founded in 2003 by pollster Scott Rasmussen, the firm’s forecasts received high marks for accuracy in the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections. But it fell short in 2012, predicting victories for Mitt Romney over Barack Obama in several states that Obama won.

As my colleague James Rainey observed in the aftermath, the Rasmussen polls had been used by conservative media outlets “to prop up a narrative in the final days of the campaign that Romney had momentum and a good chance of winning the White House.”

In 2013, Scott Rasmussen left the firm due to unspecified business disagreements with its owner, the private equity firm Noson Lawen Partners.

In recent years, the firm has resembled a pollster-for-hire appealing to conservative organizations and authors. During the Trump administration, it became known for “a social media presence that embraced false claims that spread widely on the right,” Philip Bump of the Washington Post observed in March.

The firm’s treatment of the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, in which Democrat Katie Hobbs defeated Republican Kari Lake, is a good example. In March 2023, Rasmussen reported the results of a poll it had conducted four months after the election, purportedly finding (according to a headline on its website) that “most Arizona voters believe election ‘irregularities’ affected outcome.”


BUSINESS
Column: Disinformation is a public health crisis. Here’s how scientists and doctors are fighting it
Feb. 22, 2024

According to Rasmussen, 51% of Arizona voters chose Lake and only 43% voted for Hobbs. The poll placed the election turnout at 92%; actually it was 62.6%.

On Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast, Mark Mitchell, Rasmussen’s lead pollster, said its results showed that “people in Arizona, by and large, think that cheating happened.” That unsupported assertion, of course, is the core of the long, fruitless campaign to overturn the election by Lake — who gleefully cited the Rasmussen results.

Rasmussen polls on COVID vaccines and other such topics aren’t entirely worthless. They may not tell us anything useful about scientific research or electoral results, but they do offer a window into how propaganda and claptrap have penetrated deeply into our political discourse, at least within the right-wing fever swamp.

That brings us back to its polling on COVID and COVID vaccines. Rasmussen’s methodology seems to include wording its questions as if they are stating a fact, no matter how dubious. For its May 2024 poll of 1,250 American adults, for instance, it asked, “Do you know someone personally who died from side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine?” Rasmussen reported that 19% replied in the affirmative; the poll had a margin of error of 3%.

Such questions have obvious flaws. The most important is that most respondents have no way of knowing whether an acquaintance’s death was related to the vaccine; nor does Rasmussen, which conducts its polls with robot calls, have any way of authenticating the respondent’s answer.

Blaming the COVID vaccines for a tide of undocumented injuries and deaths is a popular theme in the anti-vaccine community.

For them, it has the virtue of being suggestive and unverifiable; with nearly 700 million doses of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines having been administered in the U.S. alone, the law of large numbers implies that “by random chance alone ... there will be a large number of people who die within, say, 30 days of being vaccinated even if the vaccine has absolutely nothing to do with their deaths,” in the words of veteran pseudoscience debunker David Gorski.

It’s not unusual for the death or illness of a prominent entertainer or athlete to provoke swarms of anti-vaxxers to assert that the victim must have been recently vaccinated. Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who I earlier identified as “the most dangerous quack in America” and a “card-carrying member of the anti-vaccine mafia,” misrepresented published research to claim that the COVID vaccine presented an elevated threat of cardiac problems for young men.


Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, seen here with his political patron Gov. Ron DeSantis, has promoted the long-debunked idea that the COVID vaccines are more dangerous than the disease.
(Chris O’Meara / Associated Press)

BUSINESS
Column: Meet the most dangerous quack in America
Jan. 9, 2024

The research said no such thing; on the contrary, it said that the risk of cardiac death from the vaccines was statistically nonexistent and, indeed, lower than the risk of cardiac death resulting from catching COVID-19 itself.

Despite all that, conjectures by laypersons that the illness or death of acquaintances can be traced to the vaccines are legion. One promoter of the idea, economist Mark Skidmore of Michigan State University, even concluded from an anonymous database of 2,840 respondents compiled by a third-party survey firm that the number of respondents who said they knew someone who had died from the vaccine meant that the number of deaths from the vaccine in the U.S. “may be as high as 278,000.”

Skidmore’s paper citing that statistic was retracted last year by the peer-reviewed journal that had published it.

Rasmussen’s promotion of its vaccine-related balderdash is replete with weasel words, as if the firm is opting for plausible deniability.

In its tweet stating that “If the numbers implied by our COVID polling are correct, the vaccines killed more people worldwide than Jews killed in the Holocaust,” for instance, the word “if” carries a lot of baggage — not that its invocation of the Holocaust is defensible under the circumstances.

Similarly, its tweet, “China lied. Fauci lied. People died” refers to a question on its June 23 poll about COVID, in which it asks respondents to agree or disagree with that phrase. (This is known as “JAQing,” for “just asking questions.”)

As for its tweet stating, “The government take over of medicine was as deadly as always predicted,” that’s cast as a comment on a tweet by the former CBS and Fox reporter-turned-conspiracy-monger Lara Logan. She had written, “Pointing out how [Anthony] Fauci was seen by many as one of the worst mass killers in history — is what got me taken off the air at Fox. It was true then — and it is true now.”

Leave aside that the U.S. government has not staged a “take over of medicine,” much less that government action in healthcare has been “deadly.”

Make no mistake: Rasmussen is responsible for these tweets, and deserves blame helping to foment a mass delusion about the vaccines that may have cost the lives of vaccine resisters. If it ever had a reputation for trustworthiness, it doesn’t have it any longer.


Michael Hiltzik
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Michael Hiltzik has written for the Los Angeles Times for more than 40 years. His business column appears in print every Sunday and Wednesday, and occasionally on other days. Hiltzik and colleague Chuck Philips shared the 1999 Pulitzer Prize for articles exposing corruption in the entertainment industry. His seventh book, “Iron Empires: Robber Barons, Railroads, and the Making of Modern America,” was published in 2020. His forthcoming book, “The Golden State,” is a history of California. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/hiltzikm and on Facebook at facebook.com/hiltzik.

'A great loss': Yemen bids farewell to one of its last remaining Jews

Residents of Madar, Yahya Ben Youssef's village, say he was beloved and appreciated by the local Muslim community, and he chose to stay despite opportunities to leave; only 5 Jews remain in country


Lior Ben Ari|
Updated:Yesterday | 

Following the death of Yahya Ben Youssef last week, the Jewish community in Yemen has dwindled to just five members, among them his elderly wife, who did not attend his funeral and is feared to have the same illness that claimed her husband’s life.

Yahya, who had no children, was laid to rest by his Muslim neighbors in the village of Madar, north of the capital, Sanaa.

 
Yahya Ben Youssef
(Photo: via social media)
A local source, familiar with the situation, confirmed that only five Jews now remain in Yemen. One of them has been detained since late 2015 for participating in a smuggling operation to deliver a Torah scroll to Israel.
"Yahya was beloved by his village," the source said. "He was a good man. That’s why when he passed away, all the villagers came to bury him and held a funeral for him." A new video from the funeral shows residents carrying Yahya's body, wrapped in a Jewish prayer shawl, to a grave on a hilltop near the village.
Despite some opposition at the burial site, most villagers supported the funeral. "Yahya refused to live in the Amran province’s Al Rida area, where the other Jews reside because he loved Sanaa and his Muslim neighbors there," the source added.


The funeral in Yemen

Yahya had previously moved to Al Rida before 2013, living in the home of a man now residing in the Emirates, but he eventually returned to his childhood village, where he passed away.
The source noted that other Yemeni Jews frequently visited Yahya. "The Jews in Al Rida loved him and always visited him, offering him to move, but he didn't want to leave. They recently offered him to leave Yemen, but he declined, possibly due to his old age. The villagers said his death is a great loss."
OPINION - The extreme-right and European politics: How worried should we be?

The growing electoral appeal of the extreme-right presents a major challenge for liberal democracy and for the European Union (EU). 

The era of stability that saw the emergence and consolidation of the EU is now over


Gerard Delanty |19.06.2024 -
 
People attend a demonstration against far-right and racism under the theme of “A Democratic Europe” in the Deutz district before the European Parliament elections in Cologne, Germany on June 1, 2024.

- The author is a Professor Emeritus of Sociology, University of Sussex, UK. He is the author of Senses of the Future: Conflicting Ideas of the Future in the World Today. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2024).

-The extreme-right may be at the moment of consolidation in Europe but, arguably, they are also at their highpoint; they are a diverse and volatile group of parties and movements with limited capacity to govern

- If Trump is re-elected later this year, the extreme-right in Europe as elsewhere will find a new source of legitimation; if Russia succeeds in overwhelming Ukraine, the largely pro-Russia extremist parties will gain additional leverage

-If there is a cause for concern, it is less that we will see a takeover by the extreme-right than a failure of governance by the center in the wake of what is increasingly looking like a crisis of governability


ISTANBUL

To understand the outcome of the elections to the European Parliament (EP) it is necessary to see the election in the context of (1) national politics (2) global politics and (3) societal transformation. The extreme-right may be at the moment of consolidation in Europe but, arguably, they are also at their highpoint; they are a diverse and volatile group of parties and movements with limited capacity to govern.

Significant moment in the post-war history of Europe


The recent elections to the European Parliament represent a significant moment in the post-war history of Europe. The growing electoral appeal of the extreme right presents a major challenge for liberal democracy and for the European Union (EU). The era of stability that saw the emergence and consolidation of the EU is now over. The question, however, is how significant the extreme right is and whether we should be worried that what we are witnessing is a dangerous drift towards authoritarianism in Europe in a context of greater instability.

Some contextualization is important. The results of the election, largely expected, can be read in different ways. While ever more voters – and in this instance surprisingly large number of younger voters especially in Germany – supported extreme right-wing parties, the majority of Europeans did not. As is well known, European Parliament elections do not have the same impact as national elections. However, despite the drift to the radical right, it seems that the center ground has prevailed, despite a significant challenge. This does not mean that we can be complacent and think nothing has changed. The extreme right has made significant gains. The Alternative for Germany (AfD), won the second-largest number of votes in Germany, after the center-right opposition. However, the extreme right is not a cohesive bloc, especially in terms of representation in the European Parliament, where it does not speak with one voice.

The Nordic countries, which all experienced a rise in radical right parties, voted for predominately left-green. There is a wide variety of parties across Europe that advocate authoritarianism, from right-wing populist parties to more radical right-wing ones to the harder neo-fascist extreme right. It is a volatile spectrum of forces that has captured much of the ground from established parties of the left and the right, but they are not all neo-fascists.

What is the outlook for the extreme right in European countries?


My sense of the current situation is that we are probably witnessing the highpoint of the extreme right. It may be the case that the extreme right has also reached the point of consolidation, but in view of the volatility of the parties and their electoral support, that is by no means self-evident. Perhaps more clear-cut is the normalization of their political concerns – anti-migration, anti-Green, and anti-EU. However, this normalization is as likely to take place on the national level of the major parties of the right and left who adapt their policies to the extreme right. This may be the ultimate testimony of their influence, leading to a more general drift towards right-wing ideology but not necessarily a shift to the extreme-right taking over. The exception here is Hungary, but then the Fidesz party is more an example of right-wing populism than extreme-right.

If we look at the EU and the wider European area, including the United Kingdom (UK), it is arguably the case that Europe as a whole is more united than divided and that the real divisions are within national countries. Yet, many countries have stepped back from the brink. Poland and Spain have clearly rejected the extreme right in recent national elections. The outcome of the general election in the UK next month will almost certainly lead to a landslide Labour government.

Ireland does not have any significant extreme-right-wing parties. It has instead Sinn Fein, a left-inclined populist party that also is the placeholder for potential radical right-wing voters. Despite the electoral success in the Netherlands of Geert Wilder’s Party For Freedom (PVV) which is more of a right-wing populist party than Extreme Right as such, he was not able to enter government.
France is perhaps the most troubled country. Its large agricultural sector, the source of much discontent, is under threat and probably unsustainable in its present organization. The overall picture is that the extreme right has limited capacity for government while having considerable ideological influence as their agendas are becoming increasingly normalized. The lesson of the monumental failure of Brexit is also all too clearly visible. A product of the radical right-wing politics, it has been a demonstrable failure and a warning to others not to follow.

Why is the extreme right on the rise?

There are two additional considerations. The rise of the extreme right must also be seen in the context of major societal structural change and in the context of global politics. Europe, like much of the rest of the world, is undergoing major societal upheaval as a result of the double transition to the digital economy and the green economy, a transition that is occurring in the context of climate change and now insecurity due to the need for increased military expenditure for defense against Russia. This is all unfolding in the context of major demographic shifts and the collapse of the possibility of an inclusive society. The nation has become a zone of struggle and division.

The other context is the global one whereby the world, at least the Northern Hemisphere, is re-aligning into two blocs, the Western liberal democracies and authoritarian states in Asia, with Russia and China at the center of these. In this shift in the balance of world power, there is much instability and uncertainty. Ukraine and Donald Trump in the United States (US) are such instances of global volatility and reference points for the extreme right, but with unclear consequences how these will play out. If Trump is re-elected later this year, the extreme right in Europe as elsewhere will find a new source of legitimation; if Russia succeeds in overwhelming Ukraine, the largely pro-Russia extremist parties will gain additional leverage.

What happens if the rise of extreme-rights is successful?

The success of the extreme right can be attributed to their ability to express all kinds of social grievances without offering solutions. They are receptacles of discontent that are particularly attractive to voters of authoritarian dispositions. They appeal especially both to those who tend to see their situation as unfavorable – due to falling standards of living, rising cost of living, housing crisis, stagnant wages, and loss of social status – and to those who are prone to resentment regardless of their situation.

The extreme right are product of inchoate anger which easily combines with a cultural backlash against anything that is representative of progress. A characteristic of the politics of resentment is that it is not fixed but is volatile and unpredictable. These parties with their focus on the figure of the migrants are more adept at mobilizing discontent than left-wing parties or those of the center since they don’t have to grapple with the problem of solidarity and the challenges of the Green transition. And there is the simple reality that European societies need migrant workers.

My overall conclusion is that the results of the European Parliament elections are in line with the general rise of the extreme right but this is not a cataclysmic moment; future trends are likely to see the continued influence of the extreme right through the normalization of populist politics as the center parties adapt to them. But there are also countertrends and we may be witnessing the high point of the extreme right. If there is a cause for concern, it is less likely that we will see a takeover by the extreme right than a failure of governance by the center in the wake of what is increasingly looking like a crisis of governability.

*Opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Anadolu
France’s Macron faces transphobia accusations after criticising left-wing coalition manifesto

French President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday faced accusations of transphobia after lashing out at the snap election manifesto of a new left-wing coalition, in particular a proposal allowing citizens to change their gender at the town hall.



Issued on: 19/06/2024 -
Emmanuel Macron visits the island of Sein to commemorate the 84th anniversary of General Charles de Gaulle's June 18th appeal to the French people to refuse to accept defeat in World War II. © Christophe Ena, AFP

The emergence of the New Popular Front, which groups left-wingers from Socialists to Communists, has been an unwelcome development for Macron since he called the snap elections in response to his party's defeat by the far right in European polls.

His ruling alliance is forecast by opinion polls to come only third in the legislative elections on June 30 – followed by a second round on July 7 – behind the RN and the new left-wing alliance.

But Macron said Tuesday on a visit to western France that he "had confidence in the French".

"They see well what is on offer. The RN and its allies offer things which may make people happy but in the end we are talking 100 billion (euros) a year."

"And on the other side, with the extreme left it's four times worse – there is no more secularity, they will go back on the immigration law and there are things that are completely farcical like changing your gender at the town hall," he added.

The left-wing coalition's programme includes a proposal allowing the change of civil status in a town hall. LFI lawmaker Andy Kerbrat told gay magazine Tetu this week that changing gender would be possible by filing a request at the town hall.

Macron's remarks appeared to cause disquiet even in the ranks of his own ruling Renaissance party.

"For trans people, for LGBT people, for everyone... we must reject all stigmatisation in political discourse and advance rights," Renaissance MP Clément Beaune, who is openly gay, wrote on X.
"Emmanuel Macron is using transphobia to attack the programmes of his political opponents," said Julia Torlet of NGO SOS Homophobie.

"The strategy is clear: use minorities in the race for power," she added.

Read moreTwelve days to convince: What outcome to French snap election campaign?
'We got Nero'

His comments also sparked an immediate counter-attack from left-wing opponents.

"We were waiting for Jupiter but we got Nero," sniped Socialist Party leader Olivier Faure.

Macron before becoming head of state in 2017 had said France needed a "Jupiterian" presidency in reference to the Roman king of the gods. Nero was one of the Roman emperors most notorious for tyrannical rule.

"How is it possible that this man who was elected and re-elected to confront the extreme right is in reality repeating the discourse of the extreme right?" Faure told RTL.

Communist Party chief Fabien Roussel told Franceinfo that the comments were a sign Macron was "losing his nerve".

"I sense a bit of febrility," he said.

The comments marked a rare intervention by Macron in the campaign, which is being led for the ruling centrist alliance by 35-year-old Prime Minister Gabriel Attal, with multiple voices within Renaissance encouraging the president to keep a lower profile.

(AFP)



South Korea declares ‘demographic national emergency’

President Yoon Suk Yeol vows to make all-out efforts to tackle ultralow birth rate

PLEASE PHUQUE

Anadolu staff |19.06.2024 -


ANKARA

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Wednesday declared a "demographic national emergency" amid a low birth rate and an aging population in the East Asian country.

Announcing the demographic national emergency, President Yoon vowed to make all-out efforts to tackle the country's ultralow birth rate, Seoul-based Yonhap News Agency reported.

"Today, I officially declare a demographic national emergency. We will activate a pan-government comprehensive response system until the low birth rate issue is overcome," the news agency quoted Yoon as saying.

South Korea is facing low birth rates and aging populations as the country recorded a fresh low total fertility rate of 0.72 last year.

According to a report, South Korean couples avoid starting a family and having children for several reasons, including the high cost of housing, education, and long working hours.

However, President Yoon promised to take concrete steps such as increasing parental leave allowances, extending leave for fathers, implementing flexible work hours, and easing the educational burden on parents.

*Writing by Islamuddin Sajid