Friday, May 16, 2025

 

Incomplete team staffing, burnout, and work intentions among US physicians




JAMA Internal Medicine




About The Study:

 In this study, physicians frequently experienced incomplete team staffing. Working with an incompletely staffed team was associated with significantly greater odds of burnout, intent to reduce clinical work hours, and intent to leave one’s current organization (ITL). Given associations between ITL and attrition, these findings emphasize the importance of adequate staffing.  


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Lisa S. Rotenstein, MD, MBA, MSc, email lisa.rotenstein@ucsf.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1679)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Media advisory: This study is being presented at the 2025 Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting. 

 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1679?guestAccessKey=cb52c805-a6cd-49e1-8f27-d519d054015e&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=051425

 

Is it time to redefine the public health workforce? New research proposes a broader, more inclusive approach



Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health





As the U.S. continues to face complex public health challenges, a new paper published by a researcher at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health calls for a redefinition of the public health workforce—one that goes beyond traditional boundaries and acknowledges the growing number of professionals outside government agencies who contribute to public health.

Published in the American Journal of Public Health (AJPH), the paper argues that while government remains the backbone of public health service delivery, it is no longer sufficient to define the workforce solely by occupation or by employment within public health departments. For example, simply counting all nurses does not reveal how many are engaged specifically in public health work.

Author Heather Krasna, PhD, EdM, MS, associate dean of Career and Professional Development at Columbia Mailman School proposes an intersectional framework that classifies the public health workforce into two tiers:

  • core workforce, comprising employees of federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial health departments;
  • wider public health workforce, including individuals across sectors and industries who spend at least 50% of their work time delivering services aligned with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) 10 Essential Public Health Services or Foundational Public Health Services as defined below.

 

The 10 Essential Public Health Services provide a framework for public health to protect and promote

the health of all people in all communities. The Foundational Public Health Services are meant to apply specifically to government health departments and “define a minimum package of public health capabilities and programs that no jurisdiction can be without.” These frameworks could be used to assess which workers contribute to these services beyond government, according to Krasna.

“This innovative approach shifts the focus from job titles to job impact, effectively ‘reverse engineering’ the workforce definition by starting with the services delivered and identifying who delivers them—regardless of where they work,” says Krasna. “The paper emphasizes that this model allows researchers and policymakers to better understand and support the broader ecosystem of professionals contributing to the health and well-being of the population.”

By embracing this expanded definition, Krasna argues, we can assess whether certain services provided by the “core” workforce are outsourced to the private sector to in a way which may be less cost-effective, or whether there are gaps in the workforce. With this definition, we can also develop more accurate workforce assessments, shape more effective training programs, and ensure stronger, more resilient public health systems. “In fact, without more accurate assessments, we lack a clear understanding of who comprises the public health workforce and whether essential public services can be effectively delivered during a crisis or in the face of a future pandemic,” observes Krasna.

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Founded in 1922, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health pursues an agenda of research, education, and service to address the critical and complex public health issues affecting New Yorkers, the nation and the world. The Columbia Mailman School is the third largest recipient of NIH grants among schools of public health. Its nearly 300 multi-disciplinary faculty members work in more than 100 countries around the world, addressing such issues as preventing infectious and chronic diseases, environmental health, maternal and child health, health policy, climate change and health, and public health preparedness. It is a leader in public health education with more than 1,300 graduate students from 55 nations pursuing a variety of master’s and doctoral degree programs. The Columbia Mailman School is also home to numerous world-renowned research centers, including ICAP and the Center for Infection and Immunity. For more information, please visit www.mailman.columbia.edu.

 

Women’s physical activity levels are less variable than men’s, study says



In addition, hormonal cycles do not have a meaningful impact on activity levels



University of California - San Diego





Women’s physical activity levels are less variable than men’s, according to a new study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research. What’s more, women’s hormonal cycles did not have a noticeable impact on physical activity levels. 

Prior research has shown that a significantly lower proportion of women do enough recommended daily physical activity when compared to men, despite the well-known benefits of exercise. Research could help find the reasons for these disparities and ways to close that gap, but women are under-represented in sports and exercise studies. This is due in part to concerns that menstrual cycles would introduce too much variability in the data. Even though that reasoning is commonly used to restrict studies to men, the assertion had never been tested. Researchers from the University of California San Diego, the University of California San Francisco and the City University of New York wanted to find out if these concerns were based on fact. 

The team analyzed data gathered from the Oura ring, a wearable device that tracks physical movement and records skin temperature and sleep patterns, among other data. The ring was worn continuously over 206 days by 596 individuals, equally divided between males and females, ages 20 to 79. They found that women’s physical activity levels—measured by Oura’s minute-to-minute metric MET, which is similar to other devices’ step counting function—were less variable and so more predictable than men’s across many time scales. In addition, physical activity levels for individuals with menstrual cycles were not more variable than the levels of those without cycles. 

While researchers found that overall levels of activity did not change on the weekends, there was a subgroup of men whose activity levels increased dramatically on the weekends. Likewise, they found a subgroup of women whose levels of activity decreased on the weekend. Older age groups tended to have the least variable levels of physical activity. 

“The exclusion of people from [physical activity] research based on their biological sex, age, the presence of menstrual cycles, or the presence of weekly rhythms in physical activity is not supported by our analysis,” the researchers write. The authors hope this will encourage those interested in studying physical activity to include people of all sexes, ages and lifestyles, as these variables do not appear to interfere with statistical assessment.

This study was funded under MTEC solicitation MTEC-20-12-Diagnostics-023 and the USAMRDC under the Department of Defense (#MTEC-20-12-COVID19-D.-023). The #StartSmall foundation (#7029991) and Oura Health Oy (#134650) also provided funding for this work.

Sex Differences in the Variability of Physical Activity Measurements Across Multiple Timescales Recorded by a Wearable Device: Observational Retrospective Cohort Study

University of California San Diego
Kristin J Varner, Shu Chien-Gene Lay Department of Bioengineering
Lauryn Keeler Bruce and Severine Soltani, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
Benjamin L Smarr, Shu Chien-Gene Lay Department of Bioengineering and Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute

Subhasis DasguptaIlkay Altintas and Amarnath Gupta, San Diego Supercomputer Center 

University of California San Francisco
Wendy HartogensisFrederick M Hecht,  Anoushka ChowdharyLeena Pandya and Ashley E Mason, Osher Center for Integrative Health

The City University of New York
Stephan Dilchert, Department of Management, Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College


 

ESOTERIC SCIENCE

Mindfulness course effective in people with difficult-to-treat depression



Mindfulness-based therapy can offer significant relief for individuals who are still depressed after receiving treatment, according to a new clinical trial.


University of Exeter





Mindfulness-based therapy can offer significant relief for individuals who are still depressed after receiving treatment, according to a new clinical trial.

Researchers hope their findings, published in Lancet Psychiatry, could provide a new treatment pathway for people with depression who have not benefitted from previous treatment. The study was led by a researcher from the University of Surrey, sponsored by the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) differs from other psychological therapies by using intensive training in mindfulness meditation to help people develop skills to respond more adaptively to negative mood and stress, in addition to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles which seek to change negative thought patterns.

The new study found that MBCT significantly improved depression symptoms compared to continued treatment as usual. The average effect was in the small-to-moderate range and comparable to treatment with antidepressants. Crucially, the study also concludes that providing MBCT as an alternative to usual treatment was cost-effective, at less than £100 per person, and could save the National Health Service (NHS) money by changing the way people use services.

The UK NHS Talking Therapies programme is the world’s largest and most advanced publicly funded psychological therapies service, treating around 670,000 people each year, of which almost half have depression as their primary complaint. About 50 per cent of those individuals still have some degree of depression when their care ends. This rate is comparable to the wider picture in the treatment of depression, which for many patients is a recurring condition.

Among them is Mary Ryan, a patient adviser and co-author who has worked with the research team from the start. The retired GP and palliative care doctor has experienced many episodes of severe depression throughout her adult life, and was first in contact with mental health services when she was 17 years old. She said: “For most people with severe depression, it’s more than a condition – it’s a recurring part of their life story. Up to now, people have often been told that they’ve reached the end of the road for psychological treatment, that there are no other options for them. The findings of this trial are hugely important because we’re telling this group of people that they still matter – that there’s something else we can try that may work for them.”

The study involved more than 200 patients who had received NHS talking therapies, but still had depression. They were recruited across 20 NHS trial sites. The three lead sites were: Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust, Devon Partnership Foundation Trust and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.

One group of participants received eight weekly group-based MBCT sessions delivered by videoconferences, aimed to develop mindfulness skills and guide participants on how to respond more effectively to difficult emotions. The other group received treatment as usual. Six months after treatment, patients who had received MBCT had larger improvements in depression symptom scores on average, than those who had received treatment as usual. 

 Study co-author Professor Barney Dunn, from the University of Exeter, said: “We know there’s a gap in services for people with depression who haven’t got better through NHS Talking Therapies. These people often don’t qualify for further specialist mental health care, and so are left with no further options. We’ve shown that offering MBCT to this group can be effective and cost-efficient to deliver, and we hope this will lead to it being implemented widely. We need investment in this and other areas where there are gaps in service, to ultimately save the NHS money.”

Study co-author Barbara Barret, Professor of Health Economics a King’s College London, who analysed cost-effectiveness in the trial, said: "We are highly encouraged by our findings, which reveal that MBCT treatment offers a powerful dual benefit for this group: superior patient outcomes coupled with notable cost savings for the NHS."

Clara Strauss, Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Sussex, said: “For vulnerable people with depression, MBCT is particularly helpful for a number of reasons. It helps people to recognise negative, self-critical thoughts as thoughts, rather than as facts and so helps to lessen their emotional impact. It helps people to be more accepting of their difficult experiences and to be kinder to themselves. MBCT also helps people to avoid getting stuck in unhelpful, repeated cycles of negative thinking. Encouragingly, our trial shows MBCT can even work for people where other forms of talking therapy have had little effect.”

Professor Kevin Munro, Director of NIHR's Research for Patient Benefit Programme, said: "This NIHR-funded study shows that mindfulness-based therapy has the potential to benefit patients with difficult-to-treat depression, as well as the NHS and the wider economy. It's a great example of practical research that could quickly help improve people's quality of life."

The study is titled ‘Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus treatment as usual after non-remission with NHS Talking Therapies high-intensity psychological therapy for depression: a UK-based clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised, controlled, superiority trial’, and is published in Lancet Psychiatry. The research was led by Professor Thorsten Barnhofer from the University of Surrey and conducted in collaboration with Exeter Clinical Trials Unit at the University of Exeter.

 


Loss of Medicare Part D subsidy linked to higher mortality among low-income older adults



Removal from the program saw mortality rates jump between 4 and 22 percent



Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine





PHILADELPHIA – While it may seem intuitive that people would die without life-saving medications, Penn and Harvard researchers have connected losing a federally funded prescription drug assistance program and an increase in mortality. The program, called the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy (LIS), helps 14.2 million low-income Medicare beneficiaries, many of whom are older Americans, afford their medications. Nationally,12.5 million people who are eligible for and enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid (“dual eligibles”) automatically qualify for the LIS, which is worth about $6,200/year.

The study, published today in New England Journal of Medicine by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, reveals that losing Medicaid coverage—and with it, the LIS—was associated with significant increases in mortality among low-income Medicare beneficiaries.

“When Medicare beneficiaries lose Medicaid, which happens to more than 900,000 people each year, they also risk losing the LIS and therefore, being able to afford the medicines they need,” said lead author Eric T. Roberts, PhD, associate professor of General Internal Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and a Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics Senior Fellow.

Preserving Medicaid coverage for older adults saves lives

The study included nearly 1 million low-income Medicare beneficiaries whose Medicaid coverage ended. Due to program rules, the exact month people lose Medicaid impacts when they are removed from the LIS.

The researchers compared two groups: individuals who lost Medicaid from January to June who were removed from LIS by the following January (7–12 months later), and those who lost Medicaid from July to December lost LIS the next January (13–18 months later). This allowed the team to compare mortality rates during the period when some had lost LIS and others had not.

Mortality was 4 percent higher among individuals who lost the LIS earlier than those who retained it for a longer period. Over the study period, more than 2,900 people died. The risks were even greater among subgroups of people who had greater clinical needs and on more expensive medications. For example, mortality was 22 percent higher among people using HIV antiretroviral therapy. 

The researchers found that over one half of individuals who lost Medicaid regained it within one year, suggesting that many were dropped from Medicaid despite remaining eligible.

“These findings show that helping low-income Medicare beneficiaries who are eligible for Medicaid stay enrolled and retain the LIS can save lives since it preserves access to essential medications,” said senior author José F. Figueroa, MD, MPH, an associate professor of health policy and management at Harvard Chan School.

The authors note that recent increases in Medicaid coverage losses among older adults raise concerns about potential losses of the LIS. Added Roberts, “As policymakers consider major changes to the Medicaid program, preserving Medicaid coverage for older adults is critical to ensuring that they keep the LIS.”

Support for this work comes from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG076437; R01AG081151; RF1AG088640; T32AG000037), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS029453), and Arnold Venture.

###

Penn Medicine is one of the world’s leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, excellence in patient care, and community service. The organization consists of the University of Pennsylvania Health System and Penn’s Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine, founded in 1765 as the nation’s first medical school.

The Perelman School of Medicine is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $580 million awarded in the 2023 fiscal year. Home to a proud history of “firsts” in medicine, Penn Medicine teams have pioneered discoveries and innovations that have shaped modern medicine, including recent breakthroughs such as CAR T cell therapy for cancer and the mRNA technology used in COVID-19 vaccines.

The University of Pennsylvania Health System’s patient care facilities stretch from the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania to the New Jersey shore. These include the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Chester County Hospital, Doylestown Health, Lancaster General Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Health, and Pennsylvania Hospital—the nation’s first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional facilities and enterprises include Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Penn Medicine at Home, Lancaster Behavioral Health Hospital, and Princeton House Behavioral Health, among others.

Penn Medicine is an $11.9 billion enterprise powered by more than 48,000 talented faculty and staff.