Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Nepal mourns its dead after anti-corruption protests

Kathmandu (AFP) – Nepal flew flags at half-mast during a national day of mourning Wednesday for the 73 people killed during youth-led anti-corruption protests that toppled the government.


Issued on: 17/09/2025 - FRANCE24

A man walks past as Nepal's national flag flies at half-mast in Kathmandu on September 17, 2025 © Arun SANKAR / AFP

An interim government, which took over after two days of protests last week, declared the day of mourning "in honour of those who lost their lives during the protests", the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement.

Protests began on September 8, sparked by a short-lived ban on social media, but fuelled by anger at corruption and long-standing economic woes.

At least 19 people were killed in a crackdown on the first day.

Anger over the deaths escalated, triggering an outpouring of rage nationwide, with government offices, a Hilton Hotel and other buildings set on fire.

"The changes we are witnessing today would not be possible without the courage and sacrifice of those who gave their lives during the protests," Hami Nepal, a key organisation in the protests, posted on social media.

Prime Minister Sushila Karki, a 73-year-old former chief justice, has been tasked with restoring order and addressing protester demands for a corruption-free future ahead of elections in six months.

Karki has declared the victims martyrs, promising state honours at their cremations.

Candlelit vigils will be held.

Shopkeeper Pooja Shrestha, 22, said that the day of mourning would bring people together.

"Everyone is sad about what happened, the loss of lives -- all young people like us," she said.

"Things have improved now, and we hope the new government will bring the changes we need."

A fifth of people in Nepal aged 15-24 are unemployed, according to the World Bank, with GDP per capita just $1,447.
'Intense'

Streets have been back to bustling business since the protests, but were quieter on Wednesday because it was declared a public holiday.

But Lokesh Tamang, 17, sitting in a gift shop in Kathmandu, kept the store open hoping for business after it was closed for days during the unrest.

Women offer prayers at the Durbar Square in Bhaktapur on the outskirts of Kathmandu on September 16, 2025 © Arun SANKAR / AFP


He recalled the "intense" violence and mourned the "sad" deaths of the protesters.

"We hope that it doesn't get as bad as it did last week ever again," he said.

Police spokesman Binod Kharel said Wednesday that the death toll from the protests had risen to 73, including police officers and prisoners as they staged a mass breakout.

More than a third of the 13,500 prisoners who escaped from two dozen jails during the protests have been recaptured or surrendered themselves, he added.

"So far about 5,000 prisoners who had absconded have returned to the prisons, many voluntarily," Kharel said.

© 2025 AFP

After mass Nepal jailbreak, some prisoners surrender

Kathmandu (AFP) – Days after escaping alongside 13,500 others in a giant jailbreak during deadly anti-corruption protests in Nepal, Avinash Rai rubbed his belly after a meal -- and strolled back into prison.



Issued on: 17/09/2025 - FRANCE24

Kathmandu's Nakhu prison bears the scars of the unrest, which saw parliament and government buildings torched © Arun SANKAR / AFP

The 46-year-old convicted smuggler stunned relatives when he turned up at their Kathmandu home during last week's chaos, in which protesters torched the parliament and toppled the government.

The violence left at least 73 dead and saw security collapse across the capital, with inmates streaming out of fire-damaged jails countrywide.

"We were in a situation where saving our own lives was a challenge," Rai, with two small bags slung on his shoulders, told AFP just before he surrendered himself at the gates of Kathmandu's Nakhu prison.

"There were no cops here -— there was massive arson and vandalism. The gate was open after that."


He emerged from prison into violent crowds and fires burning across the city.

"It was a really bad time out," he said referring to the mayhem as he escaped. "Now I'm going in."

Youth-led protests in the Himalayan nation began on September 8, sparked by a short-lived ban on social media, but fuelled by anger at corruption and long-standing economic woes.

At least 19 people were killed in a crackdown.

A day later, anger over the deaths escalated, triggering an outpouring of rage nationwide -- with government buildings set alight and violence erupting in multiple prisons.

Rai, jailed for smuggling contraband across the India-Nepal border, has served 20 months of a 22-month sentence and appealed for the new government to "show some leniency".
'Cops searching'

More than a third of the fugitives -- 5,000 out of 13,500 -- have been recaptured, police said.

Some were caught by Indian security forces as they tried to slip across the long, porous frontier.


Thousands of inmates took advantage of the chaos to escape jails across Nepal © Arun SANKAR / AFP


Many still on the run include hardened criminals.

Others, like Rai, handed themselves back in -- many convicted of lesser offences or near the end of their sentences.

His friend Nagendra Shreshtha, who accompanied him back to jail, said Rai's family had been shocked when he appeared at their door.

"It was just crazy that all these people managed to come out of jail," Shreshtha said. "We advised him that it made sense to return on his own."

At the prison gates, Rai was not alone.

Som Gopali, 40, jailed for five years for assault and with nine months still to serve, hugged his tearful wife as he also handed himself in.

"It was a shock when Som phoned me," said his sister Preeti Yonjan, 42, who also came with him to the jail gate.

"I was dumbfounded and took time to process how he was out".

Many families described anguish at their relatives' return behind bars after a brief taste of freedom.

"He couldn't have stayed out with cops searching for him, and when he has nearly served his time," Yonjan said.

- Things must change'

Nakhu prison itself still bears the scars of the unrest.

Volunteers take part in a drive to clear rubble from Nakhu prison in Kathmandu © Arun SANKAR / AFP


Walls are scorched black, slogans of the "Gen Z" youth protesters are scrawled across the entrance, and community volunteers have been ferrying in donated mattresses, blankets and utensils.

"There is burnt soot everywhere," said local volunteer Savyata Bhakti, 22.

"The first night we heard about the escape was tense, and everyone was extra vigilant about safety."

Suresh Raj Aran, 40, whose 23-year-old son Sevak surrendered, said he had fled only to escape the violence inside prison.

"My son is innocent and we want him home with his parents, but only through a proper legal process," Aran said.

Outside the prison, families expressed hope that Nepal's new interim government, leading the country towards elections in March 2026, would improve conditions.

The World Bank says a "staggering" 82 percent of Nepal's workforce is in informal employment, with GDP per capita just $1,447.

"Things must change -- because if not now then when?," said Poornima Gopali, 29, waving as her brother Som returned inside.

© 2025 AFP



Nepal: Shock Insurrection – Analysis



Gen Z protest in Nepal. Photo Credit: हिमाल सुवेदी, Wikipedia Commons


September 16, 2025
SATP
By Ajit Kumar Singh


On September 8, 2025, student-led “Gen Z” protests broke out in Kathmandu after the government imposed a ban on multiple social media platforms. Protesters carried placards reading “Shut down corruption, not social media,” “Unban social media,” and “Youths against corruption,” making it clear that their anger was directed as much at corruption and misrule as at the ban itself. As the day progressed, demonstrators – most of them young – forced their way into the Parliament complex, breaking through barricades, setting fire to an ambulance, and hurling objects at riot police. By evening, Nepal had witnessed one of the deadliest crackdowns of its republican era: at least 19 people were killed and more than 300 injured.

In an effort to calm the situation, the government lifted the social media ban that night, and Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak resigned during an emergency Cabinet meeting. But these concessions failed to placate the demonstrators.

On September 9, protests spread across Kathmandu and other cities. Defying restrictions on public gatherings, students and youth returned to the streets chanting slogans such as “Don’t kill students,” “KP Chor, Desh Chhod” (Prime Minister K. P. Oli is a thief, quit the country), and “Take action against corrupt leaders.” Violence quickly escalated. Protesters set fire to government buildings, seized automatic rifles, and attacked the headquarters of the Nepali Congress Party, the residence of former Prime Minister (PM) Sher Bahadur Deuba, and the homes of several other senior politicians. The Parliament building itself was set ablaze. Ministers had to be evacuated by Army helicopters from their residences in Bhaisepati, as mobs torched officials’ homes, including that of a Cabinet Minister. The Army Chief, General Ashok Raj Sigdel, eventually advised Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli to resign, warning that the military could only stabilize the country if he stepped down. Within hours, Oli quit. But the violence continued.

By September 12, police reported that at least 51 people had died in the unrest, including 21 protesters, three police officers, nine prisoners, and 18 civilians. More than 1,000 prisoners who had escaped from jail during the chaos were recaptured, but over 12,500 remained on the run. The Army imposed a nationwide curfew (later lifted on September 13) and took over law-and-order duties.

Amid the turmoil, a process to establish an interim government commenced. Eventually, former Chief Justice Sushila Karki was sworn in as Nepal’s first woman Prime Minister. President Ram Chandra Paudel, who administered the oath of office, also announced that parliamentary elections would be held on March 5, 2026.


The decision, however, was divisive. Though Paudel reportedly consulted political leaders, legal experts, and civil society before making the appointment, the dissolution of Parliament drew sharp criticism. The Nepali Congress (NC), the Communist Party of Nepal-Unified Marxist Leninist (CPN-UML), and the Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist Centre (CPN-MC) all condemned the move as unconstitutional and arbitrary. NC General Secretary Bishwa Prakash Sharma warned that any breach of the Constitution would raise grave concerns, while CPN-UML General Secretary Shankar Pokharel described the decision as “ironically concerning.” The CPN-MC expressed similar objections. Even Speaker Devaraj Ghimire and National Assembly Chairman Narayan Dahal called for the crisis to be resolved “within the framework of the Constitution.” In his resignation letter, Oli himself had cited Nepal’s “extraordinary circumstances” as justification for stepping aside in order to clear the way for a political and constitutionalresolution.

Although the September protests were triggered by the social media ban, the anger behind them had been building for years. Since the monarchy was abolished in 2008, Nepal has cycled through 14 governments in 17 years (the incumbent caretaker government is the 15th), dominated by the same few leaders — CPN-UML Chairman Oli, CPN-MC Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal, and Sher Bahadur Deuba — each accused of corruption, nepotism, and self-interest. Youth unemployment hovers around 20 percent, while more than 2,000 Nepalis leave the country every day to take up low-paying jobs abroad. Earlier in 2025, a viral TikTok campaign exposing the extravagant lifestyles of politicians’ children — dubbed “nepo kids” — further deepened resentment. When Oli dismissed the demonstrators as nothing more than “Gen Z troublemakers,” the gap between the ruling elite and the youth widened further.

This was not the first time Nepal had seen such unrest. In 2015, protests against the new Constitution in Terai killed 57 people. In 2022, urban voters swung behind independent candidates as a protest against the established parties. From 2023, pro-monarchy rallies have gathered strength, calling for the restoration of King Gyanendra. Most recently, on March 28, 2025, at least two civilians were killed, and 110 persons – 53 Nepal Police personnel, 22 officers from the Armed Police Force and 35 protesters – sustained injuries, as violent clashes between security personnel and pro-monarchy protesters erupted during a royalist demonstration in the Tinkune area of Kathmandu District in Nepal’s Bagmati Province. Indeed, during the September 2025 riots, tellingly, royalist offices were left untouched, suggesting that public anger was directed primarily at republican politicians rather than the idea of monarchy itself.

What made the September 2025 uprising different was its generational character. With a median age of just over 25, Nepal has one of the youngest populations in the region, and digital platforms gave young people unprecedented organizational power. On Discord, a “virtual parliament” of 145,000 members debated political alternatives and ultimately endorsed Sushila Karki as Interim Prime Minister. Protesters carried both the national flag and the Straw Hat Jolly Roger from the Japanese manga One Piece, which became an emblem of rebellion. Grassroots leaders such as Sudan Gurung, known for his disaster relief work, also rose to prominence. Their demands were simple: dissolve Parliament, hold fresh elections, and investigate corruption and state killings.

The Army played a pivotal role. It was responsible for some of the early crackdowns, but it also pressured political leaders to step aside to avert greater chaos. General Sigdel warned that failure to act could lead to a full state of emergency. Under military pressure, Parliament was dissolved, and Karki was installed as Interim Prime Minister. While many celebrated her appointment as a victory for the protest movement, it also revealed the weakness of civilian institutions and the Army’s role as the ultimate arbiter in moments of crisis.


The uprising in Nepal echoed similar youth-led movements elsewhere in South Asia. In Sri Lanka in 2022, young protesters forced the resignation of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. In Bangladesh in 2024, students brought down Sheikh Hasina’s long rule. In both these cases, corruption, economic failure, and digital mobilization drove mass uprisings that traditional power structures struggled to control. Nepal’s crisis drew international attention as well: India called for calm, China watched anxiously for spillover, the United States issued a travel advisory, and the United Nations offered assistance. Rumours circulated that foreign Non-Governmental Organisations had played a role in coordinating protests, though no evidence was produced.

The damage to Nepal was severe. The hotel and tourism industry reported losses of 25 billion rupees in just a few days. Tourism, which provides about eight percent of jobs, collapsed as flights were cancelled and curfews paralyzed daily life. With thousands of prisoners still at large, security remained fragile. Social divisions also resurfaced: while the ‘Gen Z’ protests were national in scope, marginalized groups such as the Madhesis feared that their own grievances would be overlooked. At the same time, the failures of the established parties opened political space for independent figures like Kathmandu’s mayor, Balendra Shah, who is now seen as a possible contender in the 2026 elections.

Whether the September 2025 uprising marks a turning point or simply another cycle of instability remains uncertain. Since 2008, Nepal has lurched from protest to protest, each time producing government collapse without meaningful reform. What was new this time was the scale of youth mobilization and the use of digital platforms not just to organize, but to propose leadership alternatives. The appointment of Sushila Karki was a symbolic victory for the protesters, but without deeper systemic reforms, the cycle of unrest may continue. Some fear that if disillusionment deepens further, efforts to restore monarchist and authoritarian rule could intensify.

The events of September 8 – 12, 2025, will be remembered as a defining moment for the republic. Dozens of lives were lost, thousands were injured, and the economy was battered. Yet, the protests also revealed the strength of a new generation unwilling to accept corruption and stagnation. Nepal now stands at a crossroads: it must either move toward a more accountable and inclusive democracy or risk sliding back into instability and authoritarianism.


Ajit Kumar Singh
Senior Fellow; Institute for Conflict Management


SATP, or the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP) publishes the South Asia Intelligence Review, and is a product of The Institute for Conflict Management, a non-Profit Society set up in 1997 in New Delhi, and which is committed to the continuous evaluation and resolution of problems of internal security in South Asia. The Institute was set up on the initiative of, and is presently headed by, its President, Mr. K.P.S. Gill, IPS (Retd).
No foreign power makes decisions for us, Mexico president says

Copyright Eduardo Verdugo/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved

By Jerry Fisayo-Bambi
Published on 17/09/2025 - EURONEWS


Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum marked the country's independence day Tuesday by emphasising national sovereignty amid pressures from Washington.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum declared "no foreign power makes decisions for us" during Independence Day celebrations Tuesday, rejecting US pressure for military cooperation against drug cartels as she became the first woman to preside over the national holiday.

Sheinbaum led the traditional "grito" ceremony Monday night from the National Palace balcony, ringing a bell to commemorate Mexico's 1810-1821 independence struggle against Spain.

The formal Independence Day military parade followed Tuesday.

"No interference is possible in our homeland," Sheinbaum told thousands of soldiers and cabinet members, without naming specific countries. Her remarks addressed ongoing US requests for Mexico to take additional steps against drug cartels and strengthen border security.




President Claudia Sheinbaum, left, and Navy Secretary Adm. Raymundo Pedro Morales attend the annual Independence Day military parade in the capital's main square, the Zocalo, Fernando Llano/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved



The Mexican president has rejected offers from the Trump

p administration to deploy US troops against cartels, some of which Washington has designated as terrorist organisations

Sheinbaum's government has pursued cartels more aggressively than her predecessor, extraditing dozens of cartel figures to US authorities and achieving reduced fentanyl seizures at the border.

However, she insists the actions serve Mexico's interests rather than respond to US pressure.

The Independence Day ceremony marked 215 years since Mexico began its fight for independence from Spain. The "grito" tradition dates to the early 20th century, with presidents performing it on 15 September, the night before the official holiday.

Sheinbaum assumed Mexico's presidency in October, making her the country's first female leader. Her defiant stance comes amid heightened tensions with Washington over immigration, trade and security cooperation.

Sheinbaum's administration faces continued pressure to address cartel violence and cross-border drug trafficking.

 

Which European country offers the most government subsidies to buy EVs?

FILE. Electric-powered Jeep Avenger SUV at the Paris Car Show. 17 Oct. 2022 in Paris, France.
Copyright AP/Michel Euler

By Doloresz Katanich
Published on 

While all EU member states offer some form of tax benefit to boost EV sales, there is a significant difference between their direct purchase incentive schemes, with some of the most generous ones coming from Southern European countries.

The countries offering the most generous government subsidies for purchasing electric vehicles (EVs) in 2025 are Italy (starting its scheme in mid-October), closely followed by Poland and Greece, according to Euronews Business' researc

As EV sales are still limited by high prices and a lack of charging stations in Europe, countries have implemented a wide variety of schemes. These aim to boost zero-emission vehicle sales in an effort to meet the EU’s carbon emissions goals. Targets require that fleets of new passenger cars need to reduce their CO2 emission by 55% by 2030. 

While there have been shifts since the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA) released its report about this topic in April, using the latest government-released information, we have determined where in Europe individuals can get the highest amount of support to purchase an EV.

Our research doesn't include incentives for businesses, nor does it take into account regional or local subsidies, and considers only schemes that were launched to start by October 2025.

Italy has recently announced the start of its new incentive, which offers around €11,000 for individuals, covering up to 30% of the total purchase price of a new electric car. The amount of the incentive depends on income, and cars with a price tag higher than €42,700 including VAT are exempt from this programme. 

EV sales in Italy are particularly low, according to ACEA. BEVs had a market share of 5.2% between January and July in 2025. The EU average was around 15%. 

Greece and Poland each offer around €9,000 in subsidies for individuals. 

In Greece, this is topped off with a further €2,000 for scrapping an old polluting vehicle and €1,000 if the purchaser is younger than 29 years old. Moreover, the country offers generous tax incentives. BEVs are exempt from registration tax, and the lowest-emitting vehicles are also exempt from circulation tax. Greece had a market share of 5.3% of BEVs between January and July.

Poland also imposes zero registration tax for BEVs, where the market share for these vehicles was 5.4% in the first seven months of the year.

Further countries with very generous government subsidies include Slovenia, where people can get up to €7,200 to help buy a new BEV priced up to €35,000 (including VAT). The incentive is complemented with a minimum registration tax for BEVs. This category provides 9.2% of the country’s market. 

Spain offers slightly less direct help with the purchase, between €4,500 and €7,000 for BEVs (€2,500-5,000 for PHEVs), but it is coupled with a series of tax incentives. These include a reduction of personal income tax by 15% of the acquisition cost up to a maximum of €3,000 and 75% reduced road tax in main cities, according to ACEA. Battery electric vehicles accounted for 7.8% of the market between January and July.  

The most effective schemes might not be the ones that offer the highest direct price incentives, however. 

Nordic countries, including Norway and Denmark, with the highest proportion of battery electric vehicles on their roads (market shares were 94.1% and 64.3% respectively), offer no direct purchase incentives. 

BEVs in Norway are exempt from VAT, import duties and registration fees, and they have reduced annual road tax and discounted tolls and ferry costs. In Denmark, zero-emission vehicles pay 40% of the registration tax, with an additional deduction of DKK 165,500 (€22,170). People in the country pay car ownership taxes based on the vehicle’s CO2 emissions.

Some countries, including Austria, have just scrapped their incentives for individuals for BEVs, while others are proposing new incentives, including Sweden. The country is proposing a subsidy amounting to SEK 54,000 (€4,938) over 36 months, exclusively for low-income families in rural areas, for buying EVs. The premium is expected to begin in January 2026. 

France has cut its EV subsidy budget, but still offers a sizeable package of incentives. The EU’s second biggest economy is about to add €1,000 for each European-produced EV purchase, as long as it is priced below €47,500.

Finland is considering a new scrappage incentive programme that could provide support of up to €2,500 to those who adopt a low-emission vehicle while scrapping a car over ten years old.

 


Nestlé chairman to step down after recent shock dismissal of CEO


THE VERY DEFINITION OF SMUG ARROGANCE
FILE. Nestle's Chairman-designate Paul Bulcke during the general meeting of the Nestle Group, in Lausanne, Switzerland. 6 April 2017.
Copyright AP/Laurent Gillieron

By Eleanor Butler
Published on 

The decision comes after shareholders criticised the chairman's handling of a scandal involving the firm’s CEO. Laurent Freixe was fired earlier this month after an investigation found he had failed to disclose a romantic relationship with a subordinate.

Nestlé’s chairman Paul Bulcke will step down earlier than planned, just weeks after the sudden dismissal of CEO Laurent Freixe.

Bulcke will be replaced by Nestlé’s current vice chairman of the board, Pablo Isla, on 1 October. Isla had been due to succeed Bulcke in April 2026.

A Nestlé-veteran of over 45 years, Bulcke recently prompted shareholder anger over his handling of a scandal involving the firm’s CEO.

Freixe was fired earlier this month after an investigation found that he had failed to disclose a romantic relationship with a direct subordinate, breaching the firm’s code of conduct.

The CEO was sacked with no severance pay and replaced by Philipp Navratil, the former head of Nestlé’s Nespresso business.

The firm’s board, including both Bulcke and Isla, had ordered and overseen the probe that led to Freixe’s dismissal.

Despite media speculation, Nestlé has denied that Bulcke sought to defend and shield Freixe during the early stages of the investigation.

The firm said Freixe refused to acknowledge the existence of the relationship until the moment he was fired.

Nestlé has now had three CEOs in the space of just over a year. After a period of company underperformance, Mark Schneider resigned last August after eight years in the role.

“I have full trust in Nestlé's new leadership and firmly believe this great company is well positioned for the future,” said Bulcke. “This is the right moment for me to step aside and accelerate the planned transition, allowing Pablo and Philipp to advance Nestlé's strategy and guide the company with a fresh perspective.”

Bulcke was elected to Nestlé’s board in 2008 and led the group as CEO between 2008 and 2016.

 

Romania charges ex-presidential candidate Călin Georgescu over coup attempt

FILE: Calin Georgescu, the winner of the first round of last year's annulled election, arrives at a prosecutor's office in Bucharest, Romania, Tuesday, May 27, 2025
Copyright Vadim Ghirda/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved.


By Kieran Guilbert & Euronews Romania
Published on 

Georgescu and 21 other suspects are accused of plotting violence after the presidential election was cancelled over alleged Russian interference last December.

Romanian prosecutors charged ultranationalist politician and the frontrunner in last year's cancelled presidential election Călin Georgescu on Tuesday with attempting to stage a coup.

According to the charges, Georgescu and 21 other people were planning to endanger national security and the country's constitutional order after the pro-Russian candidate's first round election victory in November was ruled invalid.

In an interview with Euronews Romania, Romania's former Prosecutor General Augustin Lazăr said Georgescu could face up to 20 years in prison if found guilty.

One of the other suspects is Horațiu Potra, a mercenary who organised a paramilitary group following a meeting with Georgescu on 7 December, according to prosecutors.

The previous day, Romania's Constitutional Court annulled the first round of the election after allegations emerged of electoral violations and Russian interference. Moscow has rejected accusations of meddling in the vote, and Georgescu has denied any wrongdoing.

The prosecutors' statement said the paramilitary group formed by Potra was plotting to instigate clashes and carry out "violent actions of a subversive nature".

Potra was arrested on 8 December while travelling towards Bucharest with a group of armed men, according to local media. He was reportedly released from custody on condition that he reported to the police, but later fled the country.

Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday, Romania's Prosecutor General Alex Florența said Potra's whereabouts are unknown but that he was trying to obtain asylum in Russia.

Romania has been the target of "extensive hybrid campaigns" by Russia over the last year, with cyberattacks and disinformation seeking to influence the election, he added.

Authorities in the EU and NATO member country in December declassified documents alleging that Moscow had organised a sprawling social media campaign to promote Georgescu's presidential bid.

Florența alleged that Georgescu had benefited from online disinformation campaigns spanning platforms such as Facebook and TikTok.

Georgescu was barred from the tense election rerun held in May. It was ultimately won by pro-EU candidate Nicușor Dan, ahead of far-right leader George Simion. Georgescu has since announced his retirement from politics.

Writing on X on Tuesday, Dan said the prosecutors' investigation showed how Russia's actions "directly supported a pro-Kremlin candidate in the electoral race".

"Romania will not tolerate any foreign interference in its democratic process," he said.

 

Pro-Russian disinformation spreads false narrative about drone incursion in Poland

A drone carrying a bomb flies over during joint Russian-Belarusian military drills at a training ground near Barysaw, Belarus, 15 September 2025.
Copyright AP Photo

By Estelle Nilsson-Julien
Published on 

At least 19 drones entered Polish airspace earlier this month. While NATO has not yet determined whether the incursion was intentional, a raft of online disinformation has since emerged.

At least 19 Russian drones entered Polish airspace on the night of Tuesday, 9 September, to Wednesday, 10 September, causing NATO fighter jets to shoot down a number of them.

This has led to a disinformation campaign emerging online, peddling a pro-Russian narrative and casting doubt over the events.

This war of narratives has been further intensified since Poland's State Protection Service revealed that it neutralised a drone operating over government buildings in the capital, Warsaw, on Monday, 15 September.

Across social media platforms, pro-Russian accounts have alleged that the damage caused by a drone, which crashed into a house in Wyryki-Wola, a village located in eastern Poland, was in fact due to a prior storm.

On X, one pro-Russian account, which also has a Telegram channel, claimed that the house "was heavily damaged during a storm two months ago and its condition has not changed since then".

The post, which has been viewed more than 140,000 times, was signed off with "- FRWL" — an acronym which stands for "From Russia with Love."

Other online users, including a far-right TikTok activist, called the story of the destroyed house "fake news".

The house's owners, Alicja and Tomasz Wesolowski, told Reuters that they were watching TV in their living room when their house was hit.

Media initially reported that the house had been impacted by a drone. Local authorities later clarified that could also have been debris falling as the drones were downed by NATO and Polish fighter jets.

Speculation intensified when Polish daily newspaper Rzeczpospolita reported that the Lublin prosecutor's office had refrained from confirming what had caused the destruction to the house in Wyryki, adding in a statement that "the object has not been identified as a drone or as its fragments at the moment."

According to Rzeczpospolita, a missile from a Polish F-16 drone, which had been used to shoot down the drone, impacted the house. These reports have not been confirmed by official sources.

Poland's Security Bureau - which provides aid and support to the Polish President, currently Karol Nawrocki - has pressed the Tusk-led government to "immediately clarify the incident", adding that "messages" must be "verified and confirmed" in the context of "disinformation and hybrid warfare."

Although it remains unclear what impacted the house, all evidence points to the direct impact of an object.

Firefighters gather on a destroyed roof to inspect a damaged house, after multiple Russian drones struck, in Wyryki near Lublin, Poland, 11 September 2025.
Firefighters gather on a destroyed roof to inspect a damaged house, after multiple Russian drones struck, in Wyryki near Lublin, Poland, 11 September 2025. AP Photo

Polish authorities have labelled the drone incursion into its airspace as "a deliberate Russian provocation", aimed at testing NATO's aerial capabilities.

NATO has not stated whether the incursion was deliberate or not, caveating that "whether or not Russia’s actions were deliberate, Russia violated NATO airspace".

Poland has rejected United States President Donald Trump's assertion that the drone incursion "could have been a mistake".

The Kremlin has responded by accusing Warsaw of spreading "myths" about Poland's drone incursion, to aggravate "the Ukrainian crisis"—referring to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022.

Questions around the might of Gerbera drones

The drone incursion was conducted at least in part with Russian multi-purpose Gerbera drones, according to a Polish army official.

On X, one account that regularly spreads pro-Russian propaganda alleged that Gerbera drones "barely have any weight, they're from styrofoam and are built to simulate a big drone. They themselves don’t do much damage, just some when they fall down".

Speaking to Euronews' verification team, David Bacci, a senior researcher in aerodynamics from the University of Oxford, explained that "Russia uses Gerbera drones because they are cheap and inexpensive to manufacture".

"You can load these drones with something like 10kg of explosives. They don't inflict massive damage on tactical and military assets, but they can destroy a civilian house."

"They can be launched from anywhere by an elastic or pneumatic catapult, which is a kind of device that you can assemble in a truck," said Bacci.

Drones such as the Gerbera not only saturate air radars, but are also very expensive to deal with.

"You may use a combat aircraft to shoot down a drone; however, a typical air-to-air missile costs between $300,000 (around €254,000) and even $1 million (€850,000). So you are spending this much to shoot something that costs $10,000 to make," Bacci added.

Fake claims that Ukraine and Poland orchestrated the drone incursion

Another claim circulating online purports that Ukraine coordinated the drone incursion on 10 September with Poland, with online users branding the drones as "false flag" devices.

Polish far-right former MEP Janusz Korwin-Mikke took to X to chime in on another pro-Russian narrative, arguing that Gerbera drones were "most probably" launched from "Ukrainian territory", in an apparent bid to imply that Ukraine was behind the incursion.

To back up his claim, Korwin-Mikke argued that the "maximum range" of Gerbera drones was 600km, in a bid to justify why these drones could not have originated from Russia.

Polish authorities have stated that some of the drones originated from Belarus.

Meanwhile, David Bacci told EuroVerify that "the maximum operative range of Gerbera drones is roughly 600 kilometres, which can go down to even 300 kilometres, depending on how you load them up. The more you load these drones, the less endurance they will have."

"Many people confuse the operative range with the endurance. The operative range is based on a return distance. So if I tell you that a drone's operative range is 600km, this means 600km out and 600km back. However, if you launch these drones, but you don't want them to return, the total range they can travel doubles to 1,200km," he added.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has rejected claims that Ukraine was behind the drone incursion as disinformation, stating "the information gathered by Poland clearly indicates that the Russian Federation bears full responsibility for the violation of Polish airspace".

This disinformation fits into a wider narrative which alleges that the drone incursion was staged as part of Poland's supposed desire to justify sending troops to Ukraine.

Former Polish MEP Korwin-Mikke also alleged that Tusk and Deputy Prime Minister Radosław Sikorski are "striving for a war at all costs".

Accounts spreading these false claims have also taken advantage of a series of contradictory media reports about Poland and Ukraine's military cooperation.

On 11 September, Polish media reported that Poland would send military representatives to Ukraine for training on how to combat drones. These claims triggered a brief public backlash, given that only a week prior, Tusk had asserted that Polish troops would not be sent to Ukraine.

But the following day, Poland's Ministry of Defence clarified Ukrainian and Polish specialists would practice the use of drones and anti-drone systems on Polish territory.

"There is currently increased disinformation activity carried out by Russian and Belarusian services. Its main purpose is to shift responsibility for the violation of Polish airspace to Ukraine and to discredit the actions taken by the Polish military and security services," stated Poland's Ministry of Digital Affairs in a statement.

 

Most Ukrainians reject Russian peace plan, back continued resistance, poll shows


Despite the strain of a conflict now in its fourth year, Ukrainians appear to retain both resilience and scepticism. 

Most Ukrainians reject Russian peace plan, back continued resistance, poll shows
An overwhelming majority of Ukrainians remain committed to resisting Russia’s invasion and reject Moscow’s latest peace proposals, even as many recognise that the war is unlikely to end soon, according to a new survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). / bne IntelliNews
By bne IntelliNews September 16, 2025

An overwhelming majority of Ukrainians remain committed to resisting Russia’s invasion and reject Moscow’s latest peace proposals, even as many recognise that the war is unlikely to end soon, according to a new survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS).

The poll, conducted between September 2 and 14 among 1,023 respondents in government-controlled areas, found that 76% of Ukrainians believe victory over Russia is possible if Kyiv continues to receive sufficient Western support in the form of sanctions, weapons and financial aid. Only 18% expect peace to be achieved in 2025, while nearly half believe the conflict will drag on until 2026 or later.

Moscow’s latest plan, which includes the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbas and recognition of Russian control over occupied territories, was rejected outright by 75% of respondents. Just 17% said they would accept such terms, even with reservations. 65% said implementing such a deal would mark a failure for Ukraine, and 69% feared it would encourage Russia to attack again.

By contrast, 74% of Ukrainians said they would support – albeit reluctantly – a settlement that freezes the conflict along the current front line without legal recognition of territorial losses, if it came with security guarantees for Ukraine. Only 30% would view such an arrangement as a success, while 44% saw it as a mixed outcome. A majority, 56%, still expected Russia to resume hostilities in the future even under that scenario.

The survey highlighted strong willingness among Ukrainians to continue resisting. KIIS reported that 54% of adults not currently serving in the military were ready to join the Defence Forces if needed, including 63% of men and 46% of women. While 23% declared themselves “definitely ready,” another 31% said they were “rather ready.” Roughly 38% said they were not prepared to take up arms.

The findings suggest that while Ukrainians are open to pragmatic compromises, most remain wary of Moscow’s intentions and pessimistic about the prospects for a swift resolution.

Hungary, a member of the EU, has consistently opposed Kyiv’s accelerated accession to the bloc, arguing it would damage Europe’s economy and risk direct conflict with Russia. Ukrainian leaders, meanwhile, have insisted that EU membership and continued Western military assistance are essential to withstand Russian aggression and prevent further escalation.

Public opinion strongly favours maintaining ties with Western partners: 76% of respondents said Ukraine should continue resisting even if US aid were cut, relying instead on support from European allies. That figure has dipped slightly since March 2025, when it stood at 82%, but remains high.

KIIS noted that war conditions make polling difficult, and while the margin of error for the survey is formally around 4.1%, systematic deviations cannot be excluded. For specific questions on peace plan scenarios, the margin of error was estimated at no more than 5.8%.

Despite the strain of a conflict now in its fourth year, Ukrainians appear to retain both resilience and scepticism. The survey indicates broad rejection of concessions that would undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty, coupled with cautious backing for temporary freezes if tied to credible guarantees.

“Ukrainians remain determined to fight for their independence, even as they face tough choices about the future,” KIIS concluded.