Monday, March 02, 2026

 

Improved EV battery technology will outmatch degradation from climate change





University of Michigan
New EV batteries are well-equipped for a warming planet 

image: 

Improvements to electric vehicle battery technology will offset their anticipated heat-related degradation driven by climate climate change, according to new research from the University of Michigan.

view more 

Credit: Haochi Wu





Climate change was poised to create an interesting catch-22 for electric vehicles. Electrifying transportation can go a long way to reducing carbon emissions that are driving up global temperatures. But warmer temperatures also accelerate the degradation of batteries, whose performance can be a make-or-break factor for people considering an EV purchase.

In a new study led by the University of Michigan, however, researchers have shown that batteries have gotten a lot better over the past several years. So much so, in fact, that their gains will more than offset their expected heat-related degradation on a warming planet. The research was supported by federal funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

"Thanks to technological improvements, consumers should have more confidence in their EV batteries, even in a warmer future," said Haochi Wu, lead author of the study published in the journal Nature Climate Change. Wu performed the work as a visiting doctoral student at the U-M School for Environment and Sustainability, or SEAS.

The team's study combined EV simulations with models of battery degradation and climate change to compare the endurance of old batteries made between 2010 and 2018 with new batteries made between 2019 and 2023. In a scenario where the planet warms by 2 degrees Celsius, old batteries would see their lifetimes drop by an average of 8% up to a maximum of 30%. For new batteries, the average lifetime drop is just 3% and the maximum is only 10%.

"I think these improvements are well-known to experts in the field. But, when I started this project, I was looking at web forums and reading how people were deciding on cars," Wu said. "There are still a lot of durability concerns about EV batteries."

Those concerns were driven, in part, by a rash of incidents about a decade ago where EV drivers in warmer climates saw their battery capacities evaporate, Wu said. But those should be problems of the past, according to the team's analysis. 

Hot takes

The researchers looked at battery lifetimes across 300 cities around the world in a variety of warming scenarios and found that the improvements held up globally. In fact, the warmest cities, like those nearest the equator, actually stand to see the biggest gains.

The team's methodology also stood out to experts in the field, as well as to editors at the journal that published the work. Their framework coupled climate projections with experimentally calibrated models of battery degradation and simulations of EV driving behavior to create high-fidelity battery profiles at granular temporal scales, Wu said.

"The authors find an interesting way to model the important role of technological advance in mitigating the negative effect of climate change," wrote the editorial team at Nature Climate Change. The journal also invited Wu and Craig to submit a research briefing about their work, making it more visible and accessible to the research community.

There are some important caveats associated with the study's results, however, pointed out senior author, Michael Craig, associate professor at SEAS and the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, or IOE. Importantly, the team used two representative EVs for their work, the Tesla Model 3 and the Volkswagen ID.3.

"In regions like Europe and the United States, we feel like we've got a good handle on the battery technology that's available in those regions," Craig said. "But when we're looking at cities in India or sub-Saharan Africa, for example, they may have very different vehicle fleets—and they almost certainly do. So our results may be optimistic for those regions."

In these regions, the impacts of warming are also going to be worse and felt more acutely, which highlights another dimension of how inequalities are exacerbated by climate change. This theme also came through in another recent study from Craig and Wu. 

Road maps to resilience

Published in the journal Joule, the researchers' related project was inspired by a similar question about how global warming would impact rooftop solar cell performance. In particular, they examined where climate change would push solar panels into high-temperature risks and extreme high-temperature risks, which are technical thresholds defined by the International Electrochemical Commission, or IEC. These high-temperature risks can accelerate the degradation of conventional solar panels, which can reduce their reliability and prompt sooner-than-expected replacement.

They found that, under the current IEC standards, those risks are underestimated for more than half of our existing and future rooftop photovoltaic installation capacity. Again, these risks will be most acute where warming will be the greatest, which are often low- and middle-income areas.

"On the solar side, we're saying we know the risk is coming, so we need to prepare for it and update our standards. But if you update the standards, there's a whole menu of options available to panel developers, manufacturers and installers that can deal with that risk," Craig said. "Just like EV technology is mitigating that risk, we can mitigate the risk in solar. We just need to have some foresight."

Although that by itself doesn't solve the issues of inequity, it does mean that groups looking for answers can focus on how the technology is deployed rather than whether it exists.

"More vulnerable regions are going to suffer a larger negative impact from climate change, but we're finding technological improvements can mitigate that," Wu said. "That is good news." 

Parth Vaishnav and Jiahui Chen of U-M also contributed to the Nature Climate Change study. Qinqin Kong and Matthew Huber of Purdue University were co-authors of the Joule report. Mingyan Sun of Peking University was a collaborator on both projects. 

Funding for the Joule study came from the NSF, NSFC, NASA and the Smart Grid-National Science and Technology Major Project. Both studies were supported by Advanced Research Computing at U-M.

Old versus new: The global outlook for battery lifetime on a warmer planet 

New study from Jeonbuk National University finds current climate pledges may miss Paris targets



Analysis projects 2.48 °C warming by 2300, reinforcing the urgency for stronger national pledges ahead of the 2030 deadline




Jeonbuk National University, Sustainable Strategy team, Planning and Coordination Division

Study reveals gap between climate pledges and Paris Agreement goals. 

image: 

Researchers utilized the RICE-2010 integrated assessment model to project long-term outcomes of current national climate pledges. The study finds that global warming could reach 2.48 °C by 2300, significantly exceeding the 2 °C limit established by the Paris Agreement.

view more 

Credit: Taeyoung Jin from Jeonbuk National University, Korea





International efforts to tackle climate change reached a major milestone with the Paris Agreement, adopted by more than 190 countries. The agreement aims to limit the average global temperature rise to well below 2 °C, preferably to 1.5 °C. However, questions remain as to whether current national climate pledges are sufficient to meet these goals.

Against this backdrop, a new collaborative study by Assistant Professor Taeyoung Jin of Jeonbuk National University and researchers from Pusan National University evaluated the impact of current climate pledges. Their analysis shows that even if countries follow existing plans, global temperatures could reach 2.48 °C by 2300. This paper was made available online on November 17, 2025 and was published in Volume 174 of the journal Environmental Science & Policy on December 1, 2025.

“Even if every country keeps its current promises to cut carbon emissions, the world is still on track to warm by about 2.5 °C, which is higher than the internationally agreed 2 °C safety limit,” says Dr. Jin.

The team carried out their analysis using the Regional Integrated Model of Climate and the Economy (RICE-2010). This model simulates how economic activity, emissions, and climate change interact across different global regions. It works through a feedback process in which economic growth leads to carbon emissions, emissions drive climate change, and climate impacts cause economic damage that can hinder future growth.

The researchers incorporated real-world policy commitments into the model, including nations’ 2030 emission reduction targets and long-term net-zero goals. They then projected outcomes up to the year 2300 under four scenarios: (1) a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario with no emission cuts; (2) a social optimum scenario focused on maximizing welfare; (3) a net-zero scenario based on actual country commitments; and (4) a 1.5 °C-compliant pathway.

Under the BAU scenario, global temperatures could rise by as much as 7 °C by 2300. In contrast, the net-zero scenario—based on current pledges—limits warming to approximately 2.48 °C. While this represents significant progress compared to a no-action baseline, it still falls short of the 2 °C target.

The study also estimates that an additional reduction of approximately 5 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent emissions by 2030 is required to meet the 2 °C goal. Without more rigorous mitigation, total global climate-related damages could reach nearly US$65 trillion by 2200. However, these risks could be mitigated to about US$19 trillion under the net-zero scenario, and further to roughly US$15 trillion under a pathway aligned with the 1.5 °C goal.

Without stronger action, the world could face more extreme heatwaves and floods, higher food and energy prices, and greater economic instability, say the researchers. However, if countries act earlier and cooperate more closely, long-term climate risks can be dramatically reduced.

“Our data reveal that today’s climate promises are important—but they are not enough. However, if countries act earlier and more decisively, the overall damage from climate change can be significantly reduced, even if it requires short-term economic adjustments,” reflects Dr. Jin.

These findings provide crucial evidence for policymakers as they prepare to update their national climate pledges, highlighting that it is high time for more ambitious and immediate action.

 

***

 

Reference
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104280

 

About Jeonbuk National University
Founded in 1947, Jeonbuk National University (JBNU) is a leading Korean flagship university. Located in Jeonju, a city where tradition lives on, the campus embodies an open academic community that harmonizes Korean heritage with a spirit of innovation. Declaring the “On AI Era,” JBNU is at the forefront of digital transformation through AI-driven education, research, and administration. JBNU leads the Physical AI Demonstration Project valued at around $1 billion and spearheads national innovation initiatives such as RISE (Regional Innovation for Startup and Education) and the Global University 30, advancing as a global hub of AI innovation.

Website: https://www.jbnu.ac.kr/en/index.do

 

About the author
Dr. Taeyoung Jin serves as an Assistant Professor within the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Engineering at Jeonbuk National University in Korea. His research centers on the analysis of energy and environmental policy through the lens of economic and system-based modeling. Dr. Jin explores the complex intersections between energy transitions, carbon mitigation strategies, and electricity market dynamics within broader economic frameworks. By leveraging quantitative models, his research provides critical insights to facilitate evidence-based policymaking in the areas of energy, climate action, and sustainable development.