Showing posts sorted by date for query ACCELERATIONISM. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ACCELERATIONISM. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, January 01, 2026

Political split over Bardot funeral with Le Pen to attend but not Macron

French President Emmanuel Macron will not attend Brigitte Bardot’s funeral next week in Saint-Tropez, while far-right leader Marine Le Pen will be present, after the late actress’s family declined the idea of an official state tribute.


Issued on: 31/12/2025 - RFI

Former French actress and animal rights activist Brigitte Bardot in February 2004. © Charles Platiau / Reuters

The Élysée Palace said on Tuesday it had been in contact with Bardot’s family following the announcement of her death on Sunday, and that a national tribute had been proposed but not accepted.

The presidency said the proposal followed “republican custom”, adding that such tributes are “systematically decided by mutual agreement with the deceased’s relatives”.

No agreement was reached in this case.


Right-left divide

The question of whether France should honour one of its most famous film stars in an official capacity has nonetheless divided the political class.

Since Bardot’s death was announced, debate has largely followed right-left lines.

Eric Ciotti, president of the UDR, a right-wing party allied with the National Rally, launched a petition calling for a national tribute. Bardot had long-standing ties to the far right and was openly close to the party.

On the left, the response was more cautious. Olivier Faure, leader of the Socialist Party, described Bardot as “an iconic actress” but said national honours were reserved for those who had rendered “exceptional services to the nation”.

He also referred to her repeated convictions for racist and homophobic remarks, saying she had ultimately “turned her back on republican values”.

In any case, Macron will not attend the funeral, scheduled for 7 January in Saint-Tropez, which will be held in private.

Relations between Bardot and the president had long been strained. In 2023, she sent him an open letter accusing him of failing to act on animal welfare. “I am angry at your inaction, your cowardice, your contempt for the French people, who, it is true, treat you well in return,” she wrote.

Photos of Brigitte Bardot hang on a security barrier near her home in Saint-Tropez, southern France, 28 December 2025. © Philippe Magoni / AP

Personal ties

Relations were far warmer with Marine Le Pen, who has been invited to the funeral and will attend “in a personal and friendly capacity”, according to her entourage.

Bardot had been close to Le Pen’s father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, and was married for three decades to a former adviser to the founder of the National Front.

She shared many of the movement’s views, including her opposition to what she once described as “the terrifying rise of immigration”.

Her support was not limited to private sympathy. In 2012, she publicly urged mayors to sponsor Marine Le Pen’s first presidential bid.

After Bardot’s death was announced on Sunday, the National Rally leader responded by praising an “exceptional woman” who was “incredibly French – free, indomitable, wholehearted”.

Bardot backs far-right leader Le Pen's attempt to stand for president


Funeral arrangements

Beyond politics, the two women were also linked by a shared commitment to animal welfare. Bardot devoted herself to the cause through the Brigitte Bardot Foundation, while Marine Le Pen is known to have studied cat breeding.

The foundation said the funeral ceremony at the Notre-Dame de l’Assomption church would be broadcast on large screens outside.

This will be followed by a private burial at the marine cemetery, ahead of a “tribute open to all the residents of Saint-Tropez and her admirers”.

Speaking to the local daily Var-Matin on Tuesday, the town’s mayor Sylvie Siri said: “Come that time, everyone will talk about her and share their fondest memories of her.”

“It will be a great moment of communion – simple, just like her,” she added.

(with newswires)



















Ecofascism, sometimes spelled eco-fascism, is a term used to describe individuals and groups which combine environmentalism with fascism.

Aug 17, 2021 ... A strain of eco-fascism was also found in Nazi ideology. As one of ... Ecofascism poses a real threat even today. Two mass killings ...

Sep 7, 2022 ... A Darker Shade of Green: Understanding Ecofascism. A UConn expert ... fascism, which many political theorists say is less about ideology ...

Apr 30, 2025 ... As such, the Siege pill (accelerationism) may follow the green pill (eco-fascism).” A combination of eco-fascist ideals and accelerationism ...

Oct 28, 2022 ... As an ideology, eco-fascism promotes “authoritarian, hierarchical, and racist analyses and solutions to environmental problems.” Eco-fascists ...

This article explores the use of the term “eco-fascism” in connection with the climate crisis and considers the political relationship between ecologism and ...

May 24, 2023 ... Ecofascism creates a twisted and corrupted view of environmentalism, where authoritarianism, nationalism, and racial purity become primary tools and solutions.


Thursday, December 25, 2025

The 12 Crucial Shifts That Will Define AI in 2026


  • AI applications must move from generating "slop" and "vibe revenue" to proving genuine unit economics and amplifying unique human voices, making organizational proprietary data truly useful.

  • Geopolitical and market forces, including the rise of cheaper Chinese and open-source models, a significant increase in anti-elite skepticism, and Europe's emergence as a trusted third pole, will drive a market correction in 2026.


A year of building an AI business has given Lewis Liu a lot to think about. He gives us his 12 AI assumptions to live by in 2026

‘Tis the season for 2026 predictions, a ritual I usually hate. Every December, pundits confidently forecast the future, only to forget their words 12 months later. I’m hardly innocent: I’ve made my share of half-formed predictions across podcasts and blog posts, promptly buried by the next news cycle.

This year feels different. Building a new company has shifted my thinking from forecasts to assumptions; it’s the kind I’m organising my company and bets around.  So here’s my version of the 12 Days of Christmas: 12 AI assumptions for 2026 that I’m actively betting on.

These aren’t abstract thought experiments. They’re shaped by a year of building a venture from scratch, investing in early-stage companies, talking to 300+ executives across a variety of industries, advising policymakers and spending time with people who are both deeply technical and unusually plugged into how AI is actually being deployed.

Context and privacy will merge as the integrated hot topic in AI. Privacy and context are two sides of the same coin: you can’t have truly effective AI without deep context, and you can’t share deep context without robust, granular privacy controls woven in. This remains under-developed as the industry focuses on foundational LLMs and basic GPT-wrapper applications, but if you want “live AI” in your workflow, context and privacy as twin-concepts will need to be borne together.

Vibe-coding will enter a trough of disillusionment, then mature. We’ve seen precipitous drops in AI-coding agents like Lovable and Cursor; AI coding platforms saw a 76 per cent drop in activity last quarter. As one meme puts it: “Vibe coding allows two engineers to develop the technical debt of 50 engineers.” These AI agents generate so much code that human engineers can’t debug or iterate on it. Yet these tools are powerful (we use them daily), and a more measured approach will emerge with the next generation, alongside improved guardrails.

Human originality will be rewarded as a foil to AI slop. Let’s face it: we’re all sick of GPT-laden lazy AI slop. We can now recognize it a mile away, and genuinely human-originated content will be appreciated in a sea of beige, thoughtless AI-generated text. Personalized AI that amplifies unique human voices offers a potential compromise.

AI will finally make organizational proprietary data useful. If we can solve privacy and context, all the unstructured and siloed data in an organization can be leveraged for greater insights and genuine automation. Data – customer data, project precedent, documented employee experience – will become as much a differentiating factor for firms as humans and culture if paired with the right controls and governance.

Boring, traditional industries (legal, finance, real estate, energy) with thoughtful AI adoption will start outcompeting their peers. Believe it or not, law firms are now among the most avid adopters of AI in knowledge management and document review, while energy development companies are actively exploring how AI can improve site construction. The gains for traditional companies are much greater than for already tech-forward ones, allowing them to leapfrog competitors.

Real recurring revenue with genuine unit economics will start to overshadow “vibe revenue”. 2023-2025 saw unprecedented growth in start-up “revenue”. If you peel back the onion, much of this revenue isn’t truly recurring, it is just repackaged services, and carries extremely low or negative margins. 2026 will bring more mature AI business practices – and yes, gross margins and real revenue will matter again.

Populist anti-elite skepticism towards Silicon Valley will rise significantly. Sam Altman’s rhetoric about “replacing humans” isn’t landing well with white-collar workers. Combined with increasing wealth inequality, this will fuel resentment not just among blue-collar workers, but among relatively affluent professionals too. As AI builders, we must build AI that works for humans, not just the oligarchic few.

Investment in physical AI in the West will dramatically increase. As part of Trump’s “American dynamism” push, investment will surge in bringing AI to the physical world the way China already has with its automated dark factories and advanced robotics. We already see Bezos launching Build AI with $6.2bn to bring AI to manufacturing, an attempt to close the gap with China.

Chinese models will continue gaining momentum and acceptance among AI builders in the West. As I discussed in my last column, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz predicts that 80 per cent of Silicon Valley start-ups are already using Chinese models. While my new venture still uses Google Gemini and Anthropic given our customer base, we’re watching this sentiment shift closely.

The “chip wars” will matter less as better, cheaper open-source models flood the market, reducing the need for best-in-class GPUs. With Deepseek 3.2 benchmarked at 96 per cent cheaper than OpenAI or Google Gemini, the question is whether best-in-class chips are necessary to build most AI applications. They may still be needed for training AI models, but running models for application building and production represents the vast majority of GPU use cases.

Market correction driven by Chinese models and data center overbuild. In my last column, I questioned the necessity of trillion-dollar data center build-outs given orders-of-magnitude cheaper models. What does this mean when, according to many economists, US GDP growth is 100 per cent fuelled by data center investments? I’m not alone: the IBM CEO questioned this last week too.

Europe will emerge as a third pole in AI, not in “regulation” nor in “AI acceleration”, but in old-fashioned trust and a perspective about humanity. Europe’s approach to AI, often caricatured as solely focused on regulation, is rooted in deeper values: privacy, human-centricity and a cautious, thoughtful perspective about AI’s role in society. This isn’t just about slowing down (though the regulation is tedious); it’s about building trust and ensuring AI serves humanity, not the other way around. As the global AI race heats up, this old-fashioned trust and distinct perspective on humanity will position Europe as a critical third pole, offering a necessary counterbalance to US accelerationism and China’s application-driven pragmatism.

AI will continue to develop at breakneck speed in 2026, but the texture of that development will be different. It has to be. AI should not be “done to humans”; it must be developed for humans, amplifying rather than replacing us. As I build my company, invest in others, and watch this space evolve, I’m organising my work around a simple conviction: the most valuable AI applications will be the ones that make us more human, not less. These 12 assumptions reflect that bet. The alternative, AI that serves only the oligarchic few, isn’t just bad business. It’s inhuman.

By City AM 



U.S. Fossil-Fuel Peaker Plants Delay Retirement as AI Power Demand Soars


More than half of the power plants in the PJM market running on fossil fuels have either deferred or canceled plans to retire as soaring electricity demand from AI data centers has operators use all available capacity to ensure the flexibility and reliability of the grids.

PJM Interconnection is the biggest power grid in the United States, whose area covers 13 mid-Atlantic and Midwest states and the District of Columbia. According to a Reuters analysis of company filings in the PJM region, around 60% of the power plants running on oil, natural gas, and coal, and scheduled to retire soon, have either delayed or canceled these plans altogether.

Most of these are also the so-called peaker units, which only run at periods of peak demand.

But the soaring power demand, mostly as a result of the AI surge and data center buildout, is now forcing peakers to delay or cancel retirements.

The Trump Administration has said and strongly supported all power sources to meet the surging U.S. demand.

Coal, for example, saw increased production this year, supported by the Trump Administration and the rising price of natural gas.

The U.S. coal production increase in 2025 has resulted from rising demand for coal, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) notes. Demand has increased due to higher natural gas prices, delayed coal plant retirements, and strong demand for heating in the earlier winter months this year.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Energy also extended a $1-billion loan to help Constellation Energy restart the Three Mile Island Unit 1 nuclear reactor to add baseload power to the grid and help the AI advancement in the United States.

Nuclear energy will be one of several winners of the AI and data center boom, alongside natural gas and power purchase agreements for renewable energy.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com


Saturday, September 20, 2025

MAGA'S HORST WESSEL

'Blood of the martyrs': These extremists view Kirk murder as call to 'holy war'


‘The devil is not gonna win’: how Charlie Kirk became a Christian nationalist martyr

The rightwing pundit’s meteoric career was in some ways a microcosm of the rise of Trump-era Christian nationalism



J Oliver Conroy
Sat 20 Sep 2025 
TNE GUARDIAN  

Christian nationalists in the US are positioning Charlie Kirk as a martyr for their movement, one that has grown in popularity and whose rise was intertwined with Kirk’s own political ascent.

After Kirk’s killing, his widow, Erika Kirk, wrote on social media that the “world is evil”, but God “so good.” The “sound of this widow weeping [echoes] throughout this world like a battle cry,” she said. “They have no idea what they just ignited within this wife.”


While Erika Kirk’s private sorrow is no doubt very real, her public remarks are telling, said Jeff Sharlet, the author of several books on Christian nationalism and the far right. “That’s holy war, that’s accelerationism, and it’s incredibly powerful,” he said, particularly in the emotional context of a grieving widow.


Charlie Kirk’s outsized influence on the Maga movement: ‘He changed the ground game’


Sharlet noted that although Kirk was best known for his non-religious political organizing, conservative eulogizing has overwhelmingly emphasized that he was a man of faith. Some people have gone further, and characterized Kirk’s death as martyrdom for conservative Christian values.

“We know that the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church,” Sean Feucht, a pastor who worked with Kirk and is known for his Christian nationalist views, said in an emotional video on social media. “The devil is not gonna win. The forces want us to be silent; they want us to shut up … We need to be more bold.”

Matt Tuggle, a megachurch pastor, posted a video of Kirk’s death with the caption: “If your pastor isn’t telling you the left believes a evil demonic belief system you are in the wrong church!”
The rise of Trump-era Christian nationalism

Kirk’s meteoric career as a pundit and far-right activist was in some ways a microcosm of the rise of Trump-era Christian nationalism. Kirk started as a publicly secular young Republican in the Alex P Keaton mold but came to embrace a strident Christian culture war, speaking of a “spiritual battle … coming to the West” that would pit “Christendom” and “the American way of life” against leftism and Islam.


Similarly, Turning Point USA, which Kirk founded in 2012, started as a pro-free market organization downstream of the late-2000s Tea Party movement against “big government”, but by the time of his death he had leaned into ideas associated with the Christian right. The organization may have done so because it spotted an opportunity.

Shortly before Donald Trump won his first election to the presidency, the mainstream Christian right was demoralized and open to more extreme and anti-democratic ideas, noted Matthew D Taylor, a scholar of contemporary Christianity and the author of The Violent Take It by Force: The Christian Movement that is Threatening Our Democracy.


A man wheels a cross past a makeshift memorial for Kirk outside Turning Point USA’s headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona, on 19 September 2025. Photograph: Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images


Christian nationalism is the belief that the US is and should be an explicitly Christian nation. Experts tend to view the ideology as existing on a continuum that ranges from relatively mainstream cultural conservatism to extreme religious supremacy. Defining it is difficult because Christian nationalism is less an organized movement than a tendency or way of thinking, Taylor and others said.

For many years, the Christian right was dominated by groups such as the Moral Majority, which emphasized the idea of organizing Christian voters to democratically achieve conservative outcomes, as well as efforts to train and elevate conservative jurists to influence the federal judiciary.

Yet two electoral victories by Barack Obama and the US supreme court’s 2015 Obergefell ruling, which legalized same-sex marriage across the country, left Christian conservatives feeling that all their efforts were for nothing. Because of changing demographics and the ongoing secularization of society, the number of Americans who identified as Christian was also dropping – meaning that majoritarian democracy was no longer a reliable political tool for the Christian right.

“The early summer of 2015 … was a low point for them,” Taylor said. “There was this sense of, ‘What we’re doing is not working. We need someone strong. We need a fighter.’ And it just so happened that Trump kind of appeared on the scene at that moment, and I think that was, in part, the rocket fuel behind his appeal to evangelicals; he said: ‘I will speak for you. I will defend you. I will give you more power.’”

Despite occasional misgivings, the Christian right soon enthusiastically aligned with Trump. But when he came into office, Trump did something new: he surrounded himself with Christian advisers from outside the traditional leadership of the Christian right. Led by Trump’s longtime adviser, the pastor Paula White-Cain, his new consiglieres tended to be megachurch preachers who had big followings in their spheres of influence but were viewed as B-list – or C-list, or D-list – figures by the conservative Christian political establishment.

White-Cain “was an independent, charismatic televangelist and megachurch pastor and was on her third marriage, a female preacher, and preached the prosperity gospel,” Taylor said – in other words, someone with many markers “that people in the conventional evangelical world would have either labeled heresy or just low-brow”.
‘He drew the church into Maga’

After this changing of the guard, there were “some pretty wild and extreme theologies” that gained access to the Trump administration and conservative centers of power, Taylor said, including a far-right movement, popular in some charismatic and Pentecostal circles, that is sometimes called the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). The NAR advocates for modern-day apostles and prophets to lead conservative Christians in turning the US into a dominion of Christ on Earth.


The NAR leaders who “attached themselves to Trump and the Maga movement very early on,” Taylor said, “had a vision of social change, of societal conquest, that was far more aggressive than some of the old frameworks of the religious right.” That vision was exciting and politically potent to people including Kirk, who adopted theories and language associated with the NAR.

The NAR has a distinctly minoritarian and anti-democratic valence. Rather than a Christian public lobbying to make government and society reflect its values, NAR ideas argue for Christians to take positions of power and push their values from the top down. A key NAR concept is something called the “seven mountains mandate” – the idea that “spiritual war” will not succeed until Christians have scaled and conquered seven summits of influence in public life, commonly identified as religion, the government, the media, education, culture, entertainment, and business.

“The seven mountains, as an ideology, is deeply ambivalent about democracy,” Taylor said. “If democracy works, and gets you to positions of power, great, but if not, well, God’s will is still for Christians to take over the seven mountains, and they need to do it by whatever means they can.”

The concept of the seven mountains has existed since the 1970s but was popularized in the 2000s, according to Matthew Boedy, a professor of rhetoric at the University of North Georgia and the author of the forthcoming book The Seven Mountains Mandate: Exposing the Dangerous Plan to Christianize America and Destroy Democracy.

Kirk had been an evangelical Christian since childhood but earlier in his career expressed reluctance at politicizing his religious views. That changed during the peak of the early pandemic, when Kirk made the acquaintance of several charismatic megachurch pastors protesting church lockdowns. He began to traffic in ideas influenced by the NAR, including the seven-mountain mandate. Turning Point USA also began to forge partnerships with churches.

Charlie Kirk speaks at AmericaFest in Phoenix on 19 December 2024. Photograph: Cheney Orr/Reuters


Kirk’s own evolution was striking: he went from saying, in 2018, that it was important that Christians respect the separation of church and state to denying that any such separation existed in the US constitution.

Kirk never used the exact phrase “seven-mountain mandate”, Boedy said, but at a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 2020 Kirk praised Trump by saying: “Finally, we have a president who understands the seven mountains of cultural influence,” which was one of the most prominent mentions of the concept in the conservative mainstream. Kirk also attended conferences organized around the theme of the seven-mountain mandate.

“‘Seven mountains’ is a kind of weird, wonky theology,” Sharlet said; Kirk “normalizes it and mainstreams it and smooths it out”.

Kirk understood “the political and religious baggage that comes with the idea of Christian dominionism, of theocracy,” Boedy believes, and was trying to gently popularize Christian nationalist ideas while avoiding their more negative connotations.

The “Appeal to Heaven” flags seen at the January 6 riot and elsewhere are often an NAR symbol. Mike Johnson, the speaker of the US House of Representatives, has ties to NAR circles and flies an Appeal to Heaven flag at his congressional office. Ché Ahn, the Republican candidate for governor of California and a charismatic preacher, is an adherent of NAR and “seven-mountain” ideas.

Kirk was an activist more interested in uniting conservative Christians than representing any one faction or denomination. Yet the NAR might be understood as one of three main currents of hardline contemporary Christian nationalism in the US, Taylor said. The other two streams are radical traditionalist Catholics and a certain aggressively “masculine” reformed Protestantism embodied in Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defense.

In contrast to the Catholic and reformed Protestant camps, which tend to be very white and male in their leadership and intellectually influential but not widely popular, the NAR has roots in a rapidly growing international charismatic movement that is multi-ethnic, open to women in leadership, and viscerally exciting to rank-and-file churchgoers.


Memes and nihilistic in-jokes: the online world of Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer


Yet the symbolism and rhetoric of Christian nationalism are also attractive to broad swathes of conservative Americans, including those who are not actively religious, Sharlet noted. Although the Christian nationalism of popular imagination is a strict, Handmaid’s Tale-style piety, he said he often encounters Maga conservatives who are intensely dedicated to Christian nationalist ideas despite the fact that they do not attend church.

“It wasn’t so much that [Kirk] joined the church as he drew the church into Maga,” Sharlet feels. “And I think he made a kind of influencer-lifestyle Christian nationalism that was appealing, that you could adopt [as a] kind of performance without having to change your life too much.”

“No civilization has ever collapsed because it prays too much,” Kirk declared not long before he died. But he also gestured at a broader and more potent theme: that “a civilization that abandons God will deteriorate and ultimately collapse from the inside out.”


Right wing MEPs call for European Parliament to condemn Charlie Kirk murder

Some 84 lawmakers have signed a proposal for a resolution against political violence, which could be voted on in October.


Copyright Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

By Vincenzo Genovese
Published on 19/09/2025 - EURONEWS

The European Parliament should condemn the recent murders of American conservative political activist Charlie Kirk and Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska, according to a resolution tabled by 84 right wing MEPs and seen by Euronews.

The shooting of Kirk in Utah on 10 September and the stabbing of Zarutska in North Carolina in August have been heavily condemned by US President Donald Trump.

Kirk’s killing has also become a point of discussion in Europe, with some leaders expressing their condolences. Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called it “shocking” and “a deep wound for democracy”, while European Parliament President Roberta Metsola said she was “shocked at the absolutely horrific assassination”.

clash also took place last Thursday during a plenary session of the European Parliament in Strasbourg, when an MEP from the right wing Sweden Democrats party called for a minute's silence to commemorate Kirk’s death, which was denied by vice-president of the Parliament, Socialist MEP Katarina Barley

Now several right-wing lawmakers want an official resolution to be voted on by the Parliament, expressing solidarity with the victims’ families and calling for “zero tolerance” toward political and extremist violence.

The resolution was promoted by two Italian members of the far-right Patriots for Europe (PfE) group, Susanna Ceccardi and Paolo Borchia (The League). “These brutal killings shock our consciences and show how political violence and ideological hatred can strike indiscriminately,” declared Ceccardi and Borchia, in a joint statement seen by Euronews.

"Violence, ideological hatred, and political intimidation must be opposed with zero tolerance in all democratic societies," reads the text, stressing that "media should report such attacks honestly without soft-pedalling or suppressing information".

Other signatories of the resolution come mostly from the PfE group, but also from the European Conservatives and Reformists, like Poland’s Dominik Tarczynski, Italy’s Carlo Fidanza, and Sweden’s Charlie Weimers.

Now the resolution will be checked by the Parliament's President Roberta Metsola's office. If it is considered acceptable, it will be referred to a Parliamentary commission for development into a proper resolution to be voted on by the entire Chamber.

Then, it is ultimately up to the Conference of Presidents, a body formed by the presidents of Parliament’s political groups, to decide whether it will be on the agenda of the next plenary session, to be held in Strasbourg from 6 to 9 October.

Other political groups have been asked for their positions on such a resolution.

Friday, September 12, 2025

MAGA BROWNSHIRTS
‘Expect retaliatory action’: extremists fuel fear of violence after Charlie Kirk killing

RAW STORY
September 12, 2025


A vigil at Orem City Center Park for Charlie Kirk, in Orem, Utah. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart

After the assassination of Charlie Kirk, many Americans are realizing that political violence in the United States is undeniably on the rise.

Kirk was shot in the neck during a public appearance at a university in Utah on Wednesday. It was a shocking and graphic murder but it was not unique.

Last summer saw two assassination attempts on then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, one of which led to a trial playing out in federal court in Florida this week.

Only three months ago, a religious fanatic with a kill list assassinated Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman.

Last December, a gunman killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside a Midtown Manhattan hotel.

And in 2022, in San Francisco, a man obsessed with right-wing conspiracy theories attacked Paul Pelosi, husband of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, with a hammer, during a home invasion.

“We really need to take stock of what’s happening,” Alexander Reid Ross, a geographer and lecturer at Portland State University who studies political extremism, told Raw Story.

Ross said he was seeing celebration of violence on “far-left, irony-poisoned hipster social media accounts,” making light of Kirk’s murder by joking that “he brought debate to a gunfight” and similar jibes.

That trend carried over from the celebration of Luigi Mangione, the alleged United Healthcare assassin.

“Right now, there is an entire culture of celebrity assassins, and it seems to have spilled over from the far right to the left,” Ross said.

“We see the iconic image of Luigi Mangione as a saint. That is directly attributable to the sainthood complex of far-right and nihilistic mass shooters. We’re seeing the spread of a kind of enabling culture of political violence that just did not exist on this level 10 years ago.”

On Wednesday, in the immediate aftermath of Kirk's murder, Trump did little to calm waters, blaming “the radical left” for comparing “wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals.”

He later said Kirk was “"an advocate of nonviolence” and “that's the way I'd like to see people respond.”



‘Full accelerationist’

So does Kirk’s murder mark a tipping point into a spiral of violence?

Early reporting that ammunition linked to the shooter was engraved with markings signifying antifascism and support for transgender people is fueling right-wing calls for retribution — notwithstanding caution from at least one law enforcement source “that the report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted.”

Some neo-Nazis are heralding Kirk’s death as an opportunity for accelerationism — the idea that a moment of heightened political tension can open the door to tit-for-tat violence, creating conditions for revolutionary upheaval.

“Killing one of us is one thing,” an American neo-Nazi in Ukraine wrote on Telegram hours after Kirk’s death. “Killing one of the biggest conservative MAGA influencers is another.


“If the s---libs are going full accelerationist with the n-----s, then maybe I need to return to America.”

Users on another Telegram channel that caters to a transnational cohort of neo-Nazis who support Ukraine were at first divided, with some faulting Kirk for supporting Israel — or, in a contradictory swerve, speculating that an agent of Mossad carried out the hit because Kirk was perceived as wavering in his support for Israel.

Others worried that Kirk’s death would overshadow the killing of Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian refugee who was murdered on light rail in Charlotte, NC last month — a galvanizing event for the white nationalist movement that the Trump administration has also sought to exploit.


On Thursday night, one channel administrator offered an assessment of Kirk’s death.

“Kirk’s shooting is good for us,” the administrator wrote. “A gatekeeping cuckservative Jew shill got iced by maybe a left-winger. He will be remembered as a martyr for the cause and this shooting (along with the murder of the Ukrainian girl) will cause outrage and radicalize people to our side.

“Expect a retaliatory action on a prominent left-winger soon in some way, shape or form to come. The s--- has hit the fan now.”


‘Reckoning we need’


Mainstream MAGA figures have also linked the deaths of Kirk and Zarutska as part of an effort to paint the political left as an implacable foe.

Christopher Rufo, the intellectual architect of the right’s assault on diversity, equity and inclusion, posted on X early on Wednesday: “The psychotic trans shooter gunning down Catholic kids in Minneapolis. The psychotic black homeless man stabbing the beautiful woman in Charlotte. And now an assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk.

“The reckoning we need is more profound than you can imagine.”

Around the same time, Ian Miles Cheong, a Malaysian right-wing influencer with 1.2 million followers on X, posted: “Charlie Kirk wasn’t the first victim in this war. He was the second. The first victim was Iryna Zarutska. This is war.”

Prior to Kirk’s shooting, white nationalists organized a rally for Zarutska in Huntington Beach, CA, scheduled for Thursday. After Kirk’s death, fliers advertised the rally as “Justice for Charlie Kirk and Iryna Zarutska!”

“All nationalists need to mobilize in their cities tonight,” Ryan Sanchez, a neo-Nazi with ties to Southern California and Arizona, wrote on Telegram. “Our people are enraged, they need leadership and protection from the terrorist left.

“… Things are moving. Act accordingly.”

During the rally at the Huntington Beach Pier, participants chanted, “White man, fight back.”

In other posts, Sanchez wrote, “Iryna’s death cries out for vengeance,” and, “Death to the left.”

In response to left-wing accounts cautioning followers to avoid the rally, Sanchez gloated that “social media accounts are now warning all Leftists to evacuate Huntington Beach after sundown.”
‘Eruptions’

Despite such rhetoric from the right, Ross cautioned that there is no reason to assume an escalation of political violence is inevitable.

Researchers have studied tit-for-tat violence between the far-right English Defense League and Islamist groups in the UK, to see if “acts of violence lead to a downward spiral,” and the results were somewhat unexpected.

“That theory is not fully substantiated, because it seems that societies tend to have a kind of settling systemic function in that spirals of violence tend to exhaust themselves rather rapidly, unless there’s an actual full-blown war happening in which one side fully believes they cannot continue fully without destroying the other,” Ross said.

“The tit-for-tat killings tend to be eruptions that happen over the course of a few weeks and subside. And they subside into a current that continues and breaks out again.”

Political violence in the U.S. is not at the level and frequency as the period in Italy known as the “Years of Lead,” from the late 1960s into the 1980s, or the Troubles in Northern Ireland around the same time, Ross said.

But that doesn’t mean people should be complacent.

“Random assassinations and assassination attempts, even these kind of mass shootings that are happening — these are very bad, and they might even show a direction toward that low-intensity conflict,” Ross said.

“They’re more like signs of broader acceptance of violence. If that culture becomes sort of mainstream, then you end up with that very high level of social conflict. The biggest warning signs are the cheapening of assassination deaths and the lionization of assassins.”



Jordan Green is a North Carolina-based investigative reporter at Raw Story, covering domestic extremism, efforts to undermine U.S. elections and democracy, hate crimes and terrorism. Prior to joining the staff of Raw Story in March 2021, Green spent 16 years covering housing, policing, nonprofits and music as a reporter and editor at Triad City Beat in North Carolina and Yes Weekly. He can be reached at jordan@rawstory.com. More about Jordan Green.