Showing posts sorted by date for query TREE. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query TREE. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, October 08, 2026

 

Some of those ancient sea predators were built for surprise attacks



Rutgers researcher links tail shape to different hunting styles among the giant marine reptiles known as mosasaurs




Rutgers University

Mosasaurus

image: 

A mosasaur leaps from the water to snatch prey in this artist’s depiction. A Rutgers-led study suggests differences in the tails of these ancient marine reptiles helped shape their hunting strategies.

view more 

Credit: Illustration by Henry Sharpe/Formoso Lab/Rutgers University





Some of the giant marine reptiles that ruled the seas during the age of dinosaurs were better built for surprise attacks, while their relatives were better suited to chasing prey through open water, according to a Rutgers-led study.

These animals, known as mosasaurs, were a group of lizards adapted to life in the ocean. Researchers reconstructed the bodies of four kinds of mosasaurs from their fossil skeletons, then applied principles of physics to estimate how quickly each could surge forward with a single powerful sweep of its tail.

The calculations suggest that a particularly large Tylosaurus, one kind of mosasaur, could have reached about 15 miles per hour with a single tail stroke. That estimate describes a brief burst, rather than the speed the animal could maintain. Although the exact speeds remain uncertain, the differences among the animals offer clues to how they hunted.

The research, published in Current Biology, was led by Kiersten Formoso, an assistant professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources in the Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences.

“At the same time dinosaurs likeT. rex were ruling the land, mosasaurs were ruling the seas,” Formoso said.

Understanding how these predators caught their meals, she said, helps scientists reconstruct how ancient ocean ecosystems worked.

Modern audiences may recognize mosasaurs from the Jurassic World films and the Apple TV series Prehistoric Planet. Formoso consulted on two seasons of the documentary series and early versions of this research helped inform its depictions of mosasaur movement.

Her scientific question began with a difference in the fossils. Two major branches of the mosasaur family tree had differently proportioned tails. Could those differences have affected how quickly the animals launched an attack?

Previous research had largely focused on cruising, a steady type of swimming in which an animal repeatedly beats its tail to move through the water. Formoso wanted to examine the sudden burst that could help a predator seize prey or a smaller animal escape being eaten.

The team modeled a movement it calls a “slam-start.” An animal curls its tail to one side, then forcefully sweeps it back, pushing against the water and driving its body forward.

Formoso compared that initial surge to a swimmer pushing off the wall of a pool.

“It’s the tail itself pushing off the water,” she said.

The nearly complete fossils provided detailed information about body size and tail shape. To reconstruct the missing tail muscles, the researchers drew on the anatomy of living lizards, including Komodo dragons.

The team tested a range of assumptions about muscle power, tail flexibility and resistance from the water to see whether the findings held up under different conditions.

Across the tested conditions, two species, Platecarpus and Tylosaurus, achieved faster lunges for their body size than Mosasaurus and Plotosaurus. Platecarpus was the fastest of the four.

The advantage came largely from a longer, flexible section of the tail that allowed Platecarpus and Tylosaurus to curl it farther before sweeping it back. How far the tail could curl had a much larger effect on the modeled speeds than  all other conditions

Such an advantage would favor ambush hunting in shallowseas, the researchers said. Mosasaurus and especially Plotosaurus appear to have been better suited to pursuing prey in the open ocean.

“That doesn’t mean Plotosaurus was slow,” Formoso said. “Its tail was built for sustained, tuna-like swimming rather than sudden bursts.”

The findings agree with other clues to mosasaur lifestyles, including studies of bite force, tooth wear, and the chemical makeup of fossils.

The study also has a New Jersey connection: Alongside the four main reconstructions, the team modeled exceptionally large animals, including a Mosasaurus based on a fossil from New Jersey held by the New Jersey State Museum in Trenton.

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to put numbers on burst swimming performance in any marine reptile from the age of dinosaurs. They are making their tools freely and publicly available so other researchers can apply the approach to additional extinct swimmers, including animals with no close living equivalent.

Formoso’s broader research examines how animals with land-dwelling ancestors evolved to live in water. Her approach rests on a simple fact: The physical rules that govern swimming today also applied millions of years ago

"Physics is physics,” she said.

Explore more of the ways Rutgers research is shaping the future.

 

Study: ‘Classic example’ of sexual dimorphism in fossil record actually shows nuance between males and females





University of Kansas

Illustration of uintatheres

image: 

Illustration of uintatheres that scientists thought were a prime illustration of sexual dimorphism, or the tendency for males and females of a species to be physically different. Instead, a new study from the University of Kansas shows nuance between males and females. 

view more 

Credit: Wikimedia Commons Charles Robert Knight https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eobasileus.jpg






LAWRENCE — For decades, paleontologists have held up uintatheres as a prime illustration of sexual dimorphism, or the tendency for males and females of a species to be physically different. 

Notable for their large size, prominent horns and canine teeth, uintatheres emerged about 58 million years ago, fewer than 10 million years after a space rock killed the dinosaurs, and show up in the fossil record for the next 20 million years or so.

But a study from the University of Kansas published today in the journal PLOS One shows the differences between male and female uintatheres might not be as vast as paleontologists have long believed.

“Males have been interpreted as being much larger and possessing far more dramatic cranial features than females,” said study author Kevin Mulcahy, doctoral student at the KU Biodiversity Institute & Natural History Museum.

Mulcahy and his doctoral adviser, K. Christopher Beard, senior curator at the institute, were trying to identify a single broken upper molar from fieldwork in Montana that the researchers suspected could have belonged to the uintathere group.

“We had a research visit at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, where our main goal was just to compare that tooth to teeth from other uintatheres and figure out what type of animal we had,” Mulcahy said. “They have this big collection — entire shelves occupied with these skulls, and each one of them is almost a meter long. These are famous specimens that are in the literature, and I was originally just looking at them to compare their teeth, and I noticed a ton of variation in a way that didn’t appear binary.”

The KU scholar began recording dimensions of the skulls at the AMNH. 

“I just, really hastily, with a ruler, gathered a bunch of measurements of the skulls while we were there,” Mulcahy said. “I started playing around with statistics, and there are ways you can look at different measurements to see if they’re best fit by a classic unimodal distribution, or if you were to think you’re dealing with something that exhibits strong sexual dimorphism, you’d see something with a bimodal distribution — that there are two means, one for males and one for females.”

However, after analysis, the KU researcher wasn’t seeing that distribution in the traits he’d measured in New York.

“It wasn’t like there’s one group of specimens that look bigger than another, and then there’s another group that are smaller with smaller horns and canines,” he said. “So I was kind of interested — are these really good examples of sexual dimorphism after all? Is there actual evidence in the morphology of these skulls, in the distribution in particular of the ranges of morphology we’re seeing, that that’s what’s going on?”

Mulcahy branched out, gathered more measurements from specimens at other institutions, and used new statistical procedures. In the end, his dataset included about 30 skulls of one extinct species, Uintatherium anceps.

“Maybe there were some little signals of dimorphism here and there, but nothing really concrete,” he said. “I had an idea: Maybe it’s just that the techniques I’m using aren’t robust enough to actually measure sexual dimorphism. With fossil animals, you don’t actually know which specimens are males and which are females. You can guess and then test whether or not the ones you guess are males differ from the ones you guess are females, but that’s super circular, because you could just be picking the most extreme ones to be one sex and the least extreme to be the other. Of course they’re going to differ.”

So, the KU researcher decided to use the same statistical techniques he was using on uintatheres on modern-day bison, as he could be sure of the sex of each specimen.

“When you’re dealing with living animals, you can just take the males, take the females and compare them,” he said. “Bison are another really big herbivore, with a similar sort of ecology that’s been proposed for uintatheres, and they also have big horns. What I noticed is that the signals of dimorphism I was picking up in bison were a lot clearer. When I was looking at the bison, it was almost perfect that all of the females were most similar to the females, and all the males were most similar to the males.”

Mulcahy said mistaken assumptions about sexual dimorphism could have roots in the cultural biases of the late 19th and early 20th century, when so many fossil species were first described.

“Back then, this is right when evolutionary theory, sexual selection, natural selection, all of that is kind of coming into play,” he said. “I think it’s really important to remember that these things were first discovered in the late 1800s by a bunch of male paleontologists working in a very Victorian-era mindset. The idea is basically assumed at that point that males are going to be bigger and scarier than females. It’s really interesting: When you step back and actually test that hypothesis, it doesn’t really hold up.”

The KU researcher said a weak signal for dimorphism in uintatheres, long a flagship for dimorphism, suggests other species in the fossil record might also be less dimorphic than paleontologists have held.

“Strong, big male-style sexual dimorphism was probably not ancestral at the root of the mammalian tree, and among the mammals where we do see this pattern today, it’s almost certainly shown up independently several times,” Mulcahy said. “It had long been assumed that sexual dimorphism is the norm, that most species show that males are bigger than females. But just a couple years ago, a paper came out showing that among living mammals, most species either don’t show any dimorphism or actually have larger females. The idea that males are always bigger than females is really just a choice of what animals were people looking at, what are the things that biologists in the past were interested in.”

 

Electric vehicle batteries get a longer lifespan when weak cells are bypassed





Chalmers University of Technology

Photo Ivan Radic licensed under CC BY 2.0.

image: 

Photo Ivan Radic licensed under CC BY 2.0.

view more 

Credit: Photo Ivan Radic licensed under CC BY 2.0.





In today's electric vehicle batteries, a single weak cell can limit the life of the entire battery pack, even when the other cells are still working well. The goal is for future batteries to be able to bypass weak cells and make better use of the remaining capacity. A study, led by researchers at Chalmers University of Technology, in Sweden, now shows that a new ‘smart battery architecture’, under optimal conditions, can give electric vehicle batteries over 20 percent longer life in certain vehicles. At the same time, the total cost can be reduced over the battery's lifetime. 

Battery packs in electric vehicles, or EVs, consist of many interconnected cells that do not age in the same way. In today's battery structure, the weakest cell can therefore set the limit for the entire package.

Albert Å kegro, a doctoral student at the Department of Electrical Engineering at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden, draws an analogy, describing the structure as the cells being connected by a rope, while they all try to move forward.

"Since they are bound to each other, everyone has to keep the same pace as the slowest cell and stop when that cell stops. With the solution in our study, the battery can instead bypass the cell that is causing problems and continue forward," says Albert Å kegro, first author of the new study, which has been published in Nature Communications and conducted in collaboration with industry.

Previous research has shown how important differences between cells can be for the performance and lifespan of EV batteries. In a recently published study, co-authored by Chalmers researcher Changfu Zou, the researchers found that the weakest cells clearly limit the entire battery pack.

A battery that can adapt as cells age

In the new study, the researchers map the benefits of so-called reconfigurable battery packs, where switches and control systems can change the connections between the cells. These battery packs can bypass weaker cells so that more of the remaining capacity can be utilised.

In the researchers' models, the most advanced solution – where each cell can be controlled separately – can extend the lifespan by over 20 percent in some high-voltage vehicles, such as electric trucks and long-range electric cars. In practice, groups of cells are more likely to be controlled together, so the figure is a theoretical upper limit.

"Reconfiguration is not a question of 'on or off'. It is a spectrum, and where a manufacturer chooses to sit on that spectrum determines how much of the potential benefit can be realised," says Changfu Zou, Professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering at Chalmers and co-author of the study.

Longer lifespan can outweigh higher cost

To illustrate what the results can mean in practice, the researchers analysed an example with a typical 80 kilowatt-hour car battery and 12,000 kilometres of annual mileage. The example assumes that a conventional battery pack is replaced after 10 years, in line with current industry practice. In the model, the reconfigurable pack reaches the same point after about 11 years, so roughly 14 months longer. It also had a higher residual value because it had deteriorated less through aging.

"For a private electric car owner, it is a great advantage that the car's battery lasts longer. For a fleet with hundreds of battery packs, extending the battery life can mean significant savings," says Albert Å kegro.

The technology is not yet available in series- or mass- produced vehicles but has been tested in research and industrial prototypes. Since it requires additional electronics, the technology has a higher initial cost, but the researchers also show that a longer service life and higher residual value can outweigh the additional cost under many realistic conditions. The potential is greatest in high-voltage vehicles with a long range and many series-connected cells.

In addition to the increased battery life, the researchers also point to more sustainability gains. Today, considerable resources are spent on testing and matching cells with similar characteristics during manufacturing. The new technology allows greater variation between cells and could therefore reduce the need for such precise matching. A larger part of the battery packs can also be given a second life, for example, as stationary energy storage.

"A battery pack that is taken out of service prematurely means both wasted material and wasted energy. Keeping battery packs in use for longer is therefore a sustainability argument even before you take the economy into account," says Albert Å kegro.

More about the research:

The study System-level assessment of dynamic reconfiguration for lifetime and cost outcomes in electric vehicle battery packs | Nature Communications, published in Nature Communications.

The authors are Albert Škegro, Torsten Wik and Changfu Zou at Chalmers University of Technology; Bo Bijlenga at PHINIA Inc, Åmål; and Alexander Bessman at Scania CV AB, Södertälje.