Thursday, June 05, 2025

 OPINION


It's not an immigrant invasion. It's people fleeing for their lives — and freedom.

(RNS) — The United States has a long history of welcoming those seeking a safer life. In turn, newcomers have helped make America great.


Migrants reach through a border wall for clothing handed out by volunteers, as they wait between two border walls to apply for asylum, May 12, 2023, in San Diego. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)
Bridget Moix
June 4, 2025


(RNS) — On World Refugee Day (June 20), we will be called to be conscious of the estimated 139 million people who are expected to be displaced in 2025. Last year, more than 122 million people around the world were displaced from their homes by war, disaster and persecution.

According to the United Nations Refugee Agency, a staggering 40% of those displaced — some 50 million — are children. Shuttering U.S. foreign aid will only add to their numbers.

But as more people are forced from their homes than at any previous time, the Trump administration has shortsightedly closed the door to freedom for millions

The administration has paused all funding for recent refugees already resettling in the U.S., including the 45-year-old U.S. Refugee Admission Program. Congress has stood aside, despite its duty to invest in these critical programs and ensure their good-faith operation by the executive branch.

In addition, more than 10,000 refugees who have already been screened and approved to resettle in the U.S. are now in limbo.

No one becomes a refugee or asylum-seeker by choice. Refugees who have been forced to flee their homes often wait in camps for years before their applications to enter a new country are approved. In the meantime, they often become lost, their lives in turmoil. The asylum process, meanwhile, requires people to enter or appear in the new country before they can apply for protection.


Leliz Bonilla Castro, left, and her sister Xochina Michelle Castro, refugees from Honduras, participate in an English class for refugees, April 11, 2024, in Columbia, S.C. (AP Photo/Erik Verduzco)

Historically, the United States has welcomed, with limits, refugees and asylees seeking a safer life. In turn, newcomers have helped make America great. In large and small cities, federal and state programs have organized processes for refugee resettlement, often working with eager local faith and community groups.

As they settle into a new home, learn a new language, navigate a new culture and get back on their feet, they enrich our communities with their culture and skills.

When I was growing up in rural Ohio, our community welcomed a Vietnamese family who had fled the war in Southeast Asia. Our church sponsored the newcomers under the refugee resettlement program at the time, and my parents volunteered to act as their host. A family of seven, including five children near the same ages as my siblings and I, became our neighbors. They eventually became responsible, taxpaying U.S. citizens and lifelong friends of ours.

Even after they had built a new life and we all moved to different homes, they brought us homemade egg rolls every year at Christmas and insisted on thanking us beyond our due. One of the children is now my father’s dentist and volunteers her dental services at a local prison.

I am forever grateful for discovering the world beyond my own borders through their openness with us and that early international family friendship. It’s only now, as an adult, that I understand the turmoil their family lived through to reach our small town in Ohio, though I can never fully grasp it, and the depth of gratitude they still feel for the new home they have made in our country.

The parents have passed on, and now their children and grandchildren call this country home. They are woven into the fabric of the community.



Quakers and their supporters walk along the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, May 22, 2025, in Washington, on the final day of a march of more than 300 miles from New York City to Washington, D.C., to demonstrate against the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigrants. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

My own faith community, the Religious Society of Friends, also known as Quakers, fled persecution in England for our religious beliefs and still advocate fervently for freedom of belief as a core principle in the founding of the United States. From abolitionist and suffrage work to civil rights leadership, to peace advocacy, Friends have played an indelible role in U.S. history because previous generations were able to find refuge on this land.

Our belief that the divine lives within every person continues to inspire a commitment to freedom and human rights for all people, no matter their country of origin or how they arrived in our country.

I was renewed by this Spirit-led activism of Friends in May, as Quakers walked 300 miles from New York City to Washington in solidarity with immigrants and universal freedoms. In D.C., they met with legislators across the political spectrum, stressing that loving the stranger is a universal, revered and protected religious expression across faith traditions.

For many people of faith, providing sanctuary and refuge to those in need is a sacred act and a religious requirement.

As a Quaker, I am called to treat every person as equal, no matter their background or the journey they traveled to arrive here. U.S. and international law also recognize the same fundamental human rights for people fleeing persecution.

This year, as we mark the 45th anniversary of the United States Refugee Act of 1980, and on this World Refugee Day, Congress should stand up for freedom and human dignity, and for making America great again. A first step is committing to robust funding for refugee programs and working with the administration to reinstate the U.S. Refugee Admission Program.

(Bridget Moix is the general secretary of the Friends Committee on National Legislation and leads two other Quaker organizations, Friends Place on Capitol Hill and the FCNL Education Fund. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)

Source: Liberation Road

Building powerful, overwhelming resistance to Trump’s mass deportations is the critical battle at the moment. It’s the hook that the New Confederacy (the fascist forces coalesced around Trump, which have inherited the mantle of the Old Confederacy) is hanging its hat on. It’s the one thing they think they can hold onto as Trump’s popularity sinks on issues like tariffs and inflation. While centrist establishment Democrats are pearl-clutching and privately counting the days to the next recession which they hope will bail us out, those of us who are fighting for a Third Reconstruction should be focusing on fighting mass deportations, in the courts and legislatures, and most importantly, in the streets.

Fighting mass deportations points us at the darkest core of the New Confederacy’s evil heart, head on: its performative cruelty rooted in white supremacy. And we can win on this issue.

Despite the bravado by the Steven Millers and Steve Bannons of the Trump world that immigration is their “80-20 issue” (where they win popular opinion by that margin), they are now losing ground there as well. Michael Podhorzer’s analysis in “The Re-Emerging Anti-MAGA Majority” makes a compelling case, made stronger since he qualifies and even understates his conclusions. He writes that “if voters had known in November what they know now—which could and should have been possible—Trump would have lost.” There has been no large-scale shift to the right on immigration any more than other issues, and people think Trump is, at the very least, “going too far.”

The Boston Globe reports on “growing community resistance” in my own home state of Massachusetts to fascist masked gangs who are snatching people off the streets and shipping them away from their families without due process. Notably, the writer covers actions in places like Worcester and Acton, not known as bastions of the left. It also describes people getting involved who do not consider themselves “activists” at all—neighbors, families, preachers, city councilors, and more.

The bottom line is that there is a growing resistance to Trump on what the right thinks is its strongest issue. The racism is increasingly clear, as “refugees” from the most privileged sector of South African society, the Afrikaners, are welcomed into the New Confederacy’s waiting arms while working-class people of color are spirited to gulags in El Salvador and South Sudan. Podhorzer’s analysis tracks my own experience and that of others I talk to. Many undocumented folks, as I have described elsewhere, are not against jailing or deporting violent gang members from whom they may have already fled in their home countries. A Dominican friend in Chicago said, “Every Latino family I spoke to during the last election told me ‘We need a Bukele’”—the El Salvador president who is popular, for now, in his country for a vicious crackdown on crime. People often did not believe that Trump’s actual plan was what he sometimes promised straight out: to deport every immigrant of color they can get their hands on, even US citizens, to Make America White Again.

In discussions and protests about the deportations, I have found this obvious distinction to be very powerful: they aren’t deporting criminals, they are deporting hard-working people who have committed no crimes, and are our friends and neighbors—our own people, whether you are an immigrant yourself or not.

Some leftists reject that framework, arguing “We can’t imply support for mass incarceration, or for Calvinist capitalist propaganda about hard work.” But these are really debates among activists, with little actual impact among working-class people. They miss the best and wholly righteous way to build the anti-racist fight against mass deportations. There is nothing wrong with being concerned about crime, and there is nothing wrong with respecting people who work hard to build a life for themselves and their families. We need to meet people of all nationalities where they are and move them closer to an anti-racist, pro-democracy position.

Plenty of other arguments will do fine also: we need people to do these jobs, immigrants commit fewer crimes than native born folks—or as I told my ward councilor, “I agree we need to lower the crime rate—so let’s open the borders and bring in more immigrants!” Immigrants do in fact pay taxes, they just often don’t get the benefit of paying them; for example, they help keep Social Security solvent by paying into accounts that are not their own and from which they can never collect.

Faith organizing on this issue is particularly important. We need to increase the splits among evangelicals of all races on this issue, reminding them of Leviticus 19:34: “The stranger who dwells among you shall be to you as one born among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.” Already those who were the strangers in Egypt, the Jews, are standing up against Trump’s mass deportations by a majority and opposing his attempts to use the phony campaign against antisemitism to justify kidnapping foreign graduate students and suppressing free speech on campuses. Every church, temple, and mosque: a sanctuary by those of faith.

Further, there simply is no bold line between “citizens” and “non-citizens.” According to the Pew Research Center, undocumented folks live in 6.3 million households, 70% of which have families of “mixed status.” The crackdown on undocumented people is simultaneously an assault on US families and citizens: children, fathers, mothers, cousins. The attacks on immigrants’ access to benefits like Social Security will also hit citizens and non-citizens alike.

Voluntary deportation, or “auto-deport” intimidation, is one of Trump’s most powerful tools. Because mixed-status families are common, it affects whole communities. Families fighting deportations of loved ones are faced with mounting legal and survival fees, so some are just leaving whether they are citizens or not.

One of my friends went to his children’s school to withdraw his child before the end of the year so they could return to their home country—and was told that this was becoming common. The son of another friend was accosted by a stranger who demanded his papers—a random bigot, not even ICE. That mother and son are both citizens, but because relatives across the US are experiencing deportations and detentions, they are thinking of returning home, citizens or not. A building trades leader told me, “This is a great country—but this is not the country I thought I immigrated to.” The three people I describe here are from three different countries in South America.

Even before Trump took office for his second term, the battle lines were drawn in the courts, our legislative bodies, and the streets. The courts have been inconclusive but stood up to Trump more than I had anticipated. This is a legitimate field of struggle, and one way to gum up the works for the fascists and keep them from consolidating power. Plus we are winning back the freedom of an occasional detainee, like Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish graduate student from Tufts University in Massachusetts. But the courts are also compromised by the systematic efforts by the New Confederacy to bring them to heel—and they are SLOW, and offer little in the way of public engagement or base-building opportunities. Part of Trump’s strategy has been to slow things down in the courts, so that even if he loses some major cases when they get to the Supreme Court, 1) the damage against our people and the propaganda appeals to whiteness can’t be undone, and 2) he will just attack the “liberal courts” who are standing in the way of his efforts to save us, in the normal fascist line of attack.

The legislatures are often either under the thumb of the New Confederacy, like the national Congress or the 23 states where the New Confederacy has a trifecta—that is, controls both houses of the legislature and the governor’s office (and often the state attorney general as well). Even where that is the case, there can be field hearings held by Congressional representatives, the Anti-Oligarchy Tour by AOC and Bernie, televised Congressional hearings, and protests joined by elected representatives. In this moment we need leaders, not just legislators. Some Democrats seem to be getting this message. And in blue states we can call on legislators to actively support immigrants, like the bill in Massachusetts to provide an emergency $10 million in funding for legal defense of our immigrants. This will shore up the overworked legal advocates who are intervening and occasionally winning—or at least slowing down the fascist machine.

But the streets are key, and will push the other fronts along. The Globe article describes the creation of LUCE, a network of immigrant and other activists who develop rapid-response mobilizations whenever they can verify an ICE presence in our communities. Neighbor to Neighbor and a broad alliance of groups that make up LUCE have trained over 1,000 “verifiers” in over 25 “hubs” across the state. LUCE is modeled on the work that the Latine base-building organization Siembra NC pioneered in North Carolina during the first Trump administration. Now Siembra has created a “defend and recruit” workbook for people looking to expand this model in other states. Verifiers respond to calls to a statewide hotline and show up on site when ICE (or their various law enforcement partners in crime) is spotted. The verifiers who approach ICE are under strict training not to directly interfere with the ICE and to be non-violent. They film ICE cars and license plates, ask them what they are doing, ask for their names and badge numbers, etc., and report back to the hotline, which is staffed in multiple languages. Massachusetts has been a priority state by the feds in the last few weeks, and LUCE is receiving 700 or more calls each week.

This has multiple positive impacts. First, the videos fly over social media and the mainstream press, showing the world the brutal ugly face of aspirational fascism in the US. The video of the cruel kidnapping of the gentle and kind Rüymesa was more powerful than a thousand Substack articles like this, or a million leaflets. My wife and I watched the arrest of the daughter of a woman snatched by ICE in Worcester online—from Palermo, Sicily.

Second, ICE agents are cowards and bullies, who are masked to conceal their cowardice, even as they follow orders and leave children on streets without parents, break windows in the cars of people who only asked to see their lawyers, and drag them out to jail from in front of churches and schools. Often they simply leave. LUCE in Lynn claimed 100% effectiveness for the retreat of ICE over the last weekend when they could mobilize verifiers quickly enough. At a recent New Lynn Coalition board meeting, we viewed a video of just such an interaction. In some cases LUCE verifiers had to go back again and again to keep warding off ICE agents.

Finally, these rapid-response actions give people something concrete to DO, especially the combative youth and immigrants and others who have come to realize that this will not stop until we stop it. There is no imaginary cycle of history that will save us, this is not something that will just pass, and it is not a drill.

The scale of this kind of resistance is growing, and will continue to grow as more and more people are drawn into action. This goes beyond the regular activists who may attend Hands Off rallies. These are the people who are moving left, laying the basis to go beyond just “Hands Off what we used to have”—moving instead toward building something much better.

To be clear, immigrant defense work by groups like LUCE and Siembra will not stop mass deportations all on its own. It will take a variety of tactics by different social actors and sectors of the people, including legal and legislative efforts and other forms of both passive resistance that puts sand in gears of the repressive regime, as well as aggressive direct action. At times it feels like we have a great 10-year plan to respond to an existential 10-week crisis. Things inevitably heat up over this summer. The New Confederate thugs will no doubt respond to resistance with more repression. Fascism is not a dinner party, either. We need to expect that and prepare for it as the cost of doing our business.

But the street action of LUCE and multiple other similar efforts provide a place to win some victories, learn and uplift our own roles as working class people, and drive successes on other levels. Ultimately, it is through building and connecting these strategic defensive battles that we will lay the groundwork for the strategic counter-offensive needed to decisively defeat the New Confederacy, and put an end to its fascist agenda.

For we can win. Indeed, we already winning over public opinion on what was supposed to be Trump’s strongest issue. The American people stand with immigrants. Give light, and the people will fight.

 

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

Marta Bulaich didn’t notice the charter school that abutted her rental property in Watsonville, California, until she saw children scaling the 12-foot fence surrounding her backyard to retrieve wayward balls they had misdirected onto her property.

“I decided this is really not safe,” said Bulaich, a native of Watsonville who no longer lives there but has family and business ties to the community. When she began looking into the whole situation with the charter school’s location, there was a lot that concerned her.

She knew the school—CEIBA College Preparatory Academy, a 500-student, grade 6 to 12 school—was located in an industrial zone in the center of the city, in a building that had once been a storage center for Nordic Naturals, a vitamin and supplements company, and a facility for DHL International, the shipping company. The school moved from downtown Watsonville to the building in 2013, according to the Santa Cruz Sentinel, located in a state-approved “enterprise zone” that had been created to incentivize business development with tax savings.

The school sits between a busy distribution center for Golden Brands, a beverage company in Monterey Bay—a subsidiary of Reyes Beverage Group, the largest beer distributor in America—and a toxic site, where CEIBA plans to expand, which was formerly a pesticide manufacturing plant operated by the petrochemical company Chevron, said Bulaich. High-voltage power transmission lines run along the school’s Locust Street address.

But what concerned Bulaich the most was how students came and went from the campus. In 2019, two CEIBA students walking to school were hit by a van and had to be “airlifted” out of the community to receive medical attention, local television station KSBW reported. According to Bulaich, the students were hit while traversing a “noncompliant crosswalk” that connects to nearby railroad tracks on Walker Street, a congested access point to the school that also has a truck transit route.

The school’s front door is steps away from State Highway 129, a major thoroughfare with a 45-mile-per-hour speed limit, and one of the school’s entryways connecting to the highway is shared with Golden Brands. A video posted on YouTube shows just how harrowing this stretch of highway is and how buses that serve the school pick up and drop off students at the entryway that the school shares with the beer distributor.

According to detailed evidence submitted in a lawsuit filed against CEIBA and the City of Watsonville in 2023—including documentation showing defects of the traffic analysis done before CEIBA moved to its current location, which Our Schools examined—half the students who attend the charter school “walk or bike to school every day,” and “[n]early all of CEIBA students must cross a railroad to get to school, whether by motor vehicle, bicycle, or walking.”

Walker Street, where the students were hit, “has five railroad crossings, four of which are within 1,500 feet of CEIBA’s campus,” stated the lawsuit filed by Bulaich and Watsonville Environmental Safety Traffic Industrial Alliance, a group of Watsonville residents who live near the charter.

Among the evidence making up the suit are numerous photographs of CEIBA students on their way to school, often wearing headsets or staring into their phones, casually traversing active railroad crossings and busy intersections trafficked by semi tractor-trailer trucks.

Other photographs depict parents dropping off and picking up students along the highway and at busy intersections, often with no visible crosswalks, where tractor-trailers are maneuvering around difficult turns. A letter from an attorney called attention to “a dangerous condition on Highway 129,” especially witnessed during “the morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up times, [when] long lines of cars jockey for limited parking spaces… often stretching for over two city blocks.”

The former Chevron property that CEIBA purchased and plans to build on is described as “one of Watsonville’s most known toxic sites… [former] home to one of the world’s largest chemical pesticide-producing facilities, Ortho California Chemical Spray Company, which pulverized lead, arsenic, and strychnine in its manufacturing operations.”

The suit alleges, “CEIBA was permitted to establish its educational facility within an industrial-zoned district, situated distant from the residential zone centers of the city, where the majority of its student population resided. Any students walking or bicycling to school and back home would be traversing railway lines, a highway, heavy truck routes, industrial loading areas, and high-power transmission lines. Access to the school site was structured through a driveway on a crowded, narrow street adjacent to industrial uses.”

Another revelation to Bulaich was that Watsonville was not the only place where charter school locations have posed environmental and safety challenges to a community. “We didn’t realize this local issue is really a national story,” she said.

As the number of charter schools has continued to expand nationwide, in many states, there is often very loose government oversight about where they show up, and families and residents living near these schools are left to grapple with the many adverse consequences that crop up when these schools start and expand in their communities.

‘Communities Versus Big Business’

On the other side of the country, in Riverhead, at the base of the north and south forks of Long Island in New York, there are similar concerns about where a charter school can locate in a community.

Long Island, hemmed in by the Long Island Sound to the north and the Atlantic Ocean to the south, is a long and skinny spit of land where real estate is finite and considered a premium. “On an island,” Gregory Wallace explained to Our Schools, “if there’s anything that people care about, it’s open space and traffic.” Wallace is president of the Riverhead Central Faculty Association, the local affiliate of New York State United Teachers.

So, in 2023, when word got out that a local charter, Riverhead Charter School, had acquired land to build a new high school and athletic fields, it drew immediate scrutiny from locals. The charter wanted to build on more than 70 acres of land located in an “agricultural protection zoning district,” according to the local news network Patch. This meant the school had to apply to the town for a special use permit to build on land that, since the 1990s, had been operated by a family as a sod farm.

On the night of the rezoning hearing, in February 2024, a crowd “packed” Riverhead Town Hall, according to Patch, to speak for and against the plan. During the same month, Riverhead Local stated that some of the residents near the proposed new school organized to oppose it, started a Facebook page and petition campaign against it, and printed and distributed yard signs voicing their concerns about heavy traffic and vanishing open spaces that the charter would intensify.

Faced with such strident opposition, the charter school’s president announced in March that it was dropping its plan to build the school on the open farmland, reported Riverhead Local. Yet, two months later, Riverhead Town Hall was packed again, according to Riverhead Local, with another crowd opposing the charter school’s alternative plan to build its new school in an industrial zone. This time, the complaints were more about economics.

The industrial zone was formed by the state’s industrial development agency, according to Wallace, to incentivize developers to start new businesses and spur job growth, which would generate new tax revenue for funding the local schools. “Here, there was a proposal to turn more than 40 acres of land into a charter school, take that land off the tax roll permanently, and give it to an operation that actively siphons money away from the local schools,” he said. Charter schools receive funding from the local school district when students transfer out of the public school to the charter. Also, public school districts in New York, in most cases, pick up the tab for transportation and nursing costs for charter schools.

Due to pressure from the public, the Riverhead Town Council, which had initially supported the plan to accommodate charters in the industrial zone, nixed that option too, Riverhead News Review reported in June 2024.

In reflecting on the success of the two campaigns to keep a charter school from acquiring more land—first farmland, then industrial area land—Wallace said, “This is not a Republican or Democrat issue. This is an issue of communities versus big business.”

‘A Tool for Economic Development’

Despite the supposed popularity of charter schools, opposition to locating them in places where local communities do not want them is common.

In the West Contra Costa Unified School District in California, there was an influx of 14 new charter schools between 2013 and 2018. This led grassroots activists to organize a campaign to call attention to the many problems that arise when these schools suddenly show up. At least one of the citizen groups, the Richmond Progressive Alliance, made the campaign about local economic issues, noting, “Many of these charters are locating in mixed-use zoning areas that are not meant for schools, but rather for commercial activities that generate tax revenue and provide employment.”

“[D]espite their growth, charter schools remain highly controversial in the district,” reported Oakland Magazine in 2018, “with application hearings drawing protests at school board meetings.” Spurred by this opposition, the Richmond City Council, located in the district, enacted a seven-month “moratorium on building any new school sites in commercial zones.”

Also in California, “[p]arking, traffic, safety, and the loss of zones where industrial businesses can operate” were big concerns when a new Rocketship charter school wanted to locate in Redwood City, the Daily Journal stated in 2017. The article quoted a nearby business owner who said that around 40 trucks leave the area each morning. She expressed concerns about “who would be responsible for the safety of the children expected to walk to school in the morning and afternoon since the trucks she uses for her business traverse the… sidewalk students would use.”

In 2011, Boyle Heights Beat, a neighborhood news outlet in Los Angeles, reported about a new charter school’s “unconventional site, where a partially covered parking lot will serve as a playground. Inside the strip mall that is the school’s first home, an immigration processing office, a community adult school, and a bus terminal surround the school. Outside, is a busy business district where trucks and trailers follow their route into a nearby industrial zone.”

In Jacksonville, Florida, the Jaxson magazine reported in 2019 about “a developer” wanting to “transform” one of the “most contaminated” sites in the community with a new charter school. The new school, according to the developer, “will erase a highly visible brownfield site where the City of Jacksonville operated the Forest Street Incinerator,” the magazine reported.

In Allentown, Pennsylvania, in 2023, “Council members… unanimously rejected the Lehigh Valley STEAM Academy Charter School’s bid to amend the city’s zoning ordinances to allow schools to open in areas zoned for limited and general industrial uses,” Lehigh Valley News stated. “School district officials fought the proposal throughout the city’s zoning-approval process.”

St. Louis Public Radio reported in 2018 that “[m]ore than a dozen charter schools” in the city “have ended up in old industrial warehouses or former office space,” despite the school district having scores of abandoned school buildings it is trying to sell or redevelop.

In 2023, when a charter school in Westerville, Ohio, tried to locate in an empty office building in an industrial zone, opponents raised concerns over traffic, according to the Columbus Dispatch. Responding to the opposition, the local planning commission ultimately rejected the school.

In Arizona, state “statutes specifically allow charter schools to be located and operated at locations or facilities in zoning classifications that would have otherwise prevented a charter school,” reported AZ Big Media in 2017. “This allows charter schools to largely bypass the hassles related to acquiring zoning-friendly properties,” noted the article, which called charter schools “a tool for economic development.”

‘Promoting Development Off the Backs of Children’

Sometimes, there are similar complaints about traffic, noise, pollution, safety, and economics when public school districts need to build new schools. But public school advocates note that when public schools want to expand and add new buildings, those decisions are generally made in government-regulated proceedings that include public hearings and community stakeholder participation. And the economics have to make sense to voters who ultimately have the power to vote for or against local officials who make the decisions.

Charter schools, on the other hand, often operate more like private businesses, choosing locations based on market analyses and financial proformas that need not be revealed to the public. Even when government review boards or charter authorizers are involved in approving the schools, their deliberations tend to accept whatever criteria the charter organization provides for locating a school—or even approve schools that have yet to find a location.

CEIBA charter school in Watsonville was started with $1 million in seed money donated by Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix and a Stanford-educated billionaire, according to the Santa Cruz Sentinel. “The idea was to open schools modeled on the successful Pacific Collegiate School in Santa Cruz,” a charter school that Hastings helped start.

Meanwhile, the president of the Riverhead Charter School board, David Edwards, is from Los Angeles, according to his LinkedIn page. “So we have someone from Los Angeles deciding what is being done with our tax dollars,” said Wallace, “and we have no say over it.”

Also, just like businesses, charter schools often use complicated local zoning laws to take advantage of tax incentives or to lower start-up and operation costs. “Zoning is a very nefarious weapon that charter schools and their supporters in local government can use,” Bulaich said, “especially because it’s complicated and most people don’t understand it.”

What frustrates public school advocates even more is when local municipal and school district officials collude with charter operators.

In Watsonville, “City officials worked out the land deal with the charter schools,” said Bulaich, “because the city wants to eventually get rid of the industrial zone, even though it’s a great source of economic vitality and jobs.”

The lawsuit she joined contends that the permit the City of Watsonville (CoW) granted to the school to allow it to operate in the industrial zone was “predicated on falsified zoning administration” and incorrectly classified “children’s schools as a permitted use within an industrial-zoned district,” which was “in direct violation of the CoW’s own zoning ordinance.”

The city waived an environmental review required by state law, and the school district “either lost or destroyed relevant public documents concerning the hazardous siting of CEIBA within a heavy industrial zone.” The city, the school district, and the charter school “omitted mention of railroads in documentation, staff reports, traffic studies, public recital, [and] safety studies used to approve operations of CEIBA,” the lawsuit stated.

In Riverhead, “local town government is now clearly assisting the charter school,” said Wallace. “The town wants the charter school so they can tell folks they have a choice and to make the town more desirable for other developers to come in and buy real estate.” But there are real costs that this development initiative poses to local public schools, he maintained.

“Riverhead public schools have [nearly] a $212 million budget, and… [in 2025], $16 million is going to pay for the costs of charters. So, as charter schools expand, they deplete our resources. For every student who attends, we are charged $24,000, less than our per-pupil average costs, which are higher because of the high numbers of special ed students we serve. But it feeds the myth that charters educate students for less money. This thinking ignores that the public is paying for two parallel services.”

That thinking also ignores that the charter school is only serving 13 percent of the students in the community, Wallace noted. “So to better serve the charter, the town is undermining the school system that is serving 87 percent of the students in the community.”

“Some might say the trade-off for whatever new development the charter attracts will be worth it, but it seems to me that any trade-off posing [real estate development] against children’s access to a free public education is a false equivalency. It seems you’re promoting development off the backs of children.”

This article was produced by Our Schools.Email

Jeff Bryant is a writing fellow and chief correspondent for Our Schools. He is a communications consultant, freelance writer, advocacy journalist, and director of the Education Opportunity Network, a strategy and messaging center for progressive education policy. His award-winning commentary and reporting routinely appear in prominent online news outlets, and he speaks frequently at national events about public education policy. Follow him on Twitter @jeffbcdm.

Do We Live In Digital Slavery? How Does Artificial Intelligence Control Our Minds?

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

Directing awareness to promote a neoliberal capitalist culture


Besides using artificial intelligence to maximize profits and consolidate social control, this technology is systematically employed to gradually shape and direct the consciousness of individuals, with the aim of promoting capitalist culture and ideas, especially the glorification of Western civilization, and more specifically American capitalist values. By analyzing data and user behavior, algorithms are used to control the content displayed to them across digital platforms, such as social networks, search engines, etc., and are designed to feed individuals with content in line with values that support capitalist vision, policies and ideas.

For example, on most digital platforms, ads and promotional content are displayed that encourage individuals to buy more products, even when they don’t really need them. Capitalist values such as the eternity of private property, class inequality, individual success, wealth, consumption, and luxury lifestyles are also promoted as a criterion for “successful” lives. Another example is Google’s algorithms, which classify results according to market logic and paid advertising, not according to the social, intellectual or scientific significance of the content. When searching for concepts such as “success,” “self-development,” or even “happiness,” the first results appear to be associated with self-development companies, paid courses, and consumer advice based on individualism and profit, as opposed to the absence or marginalization of sober scientific analyses and leftist and progressive ideas, and even not showing them and in many cases directly or indirectly.

This directs the collective consciousness towards accepting these values as natural and inevitable. This is done in a gradual, soft and imperceptible manner over a long period of time, to the extent that most users of AI applications, including leftist and progressive thinkers, believe that they are neutral tools. This policy poses a grave danger to future generations, whose daily lives have become an integral part of AI, and these precise methods and policies contribute to the consolidation of capitalist hegemony and strengthen the loyalty and subservience of the masses to the existing order.

 Dismantling human skills and deepening alienation and digital alienation

In addition to the role played by artificial intelligence in reshaping public awareness, there is another dimension that has not been studied and framed in international laws, in light of the frantic race between major countries and monopolistic capitalist companies to dominate artificial intelligence markets, which is the negative impact of excessive reliance on artificial intelligence on human mental and creative abilities. The development of technology has become largely geared towards domination, profitability and competition for technical supremacy, without considering the profound effects of these transformations on humanity.

AI is touted as a way to make life easier and more productive, but reality reveals that an ill-considered reliance on these technologies may deepen superficial awareness and weaken basic human skills.  Over time, humans, especially new generations, may become less able to think critically, do calculations, write, and even communicate simple through messages, as a result of over-reliance on intelligent systems that carry out these tasks on their behalf.

In this context, human alienation is reproduced in a new digital form, where man is separated from his mental and creative faculties, and finds himself trapped in a technical system that robs him of his ability to act independently, just as the industrial worker was alienated from his product under traditional capitalism. It is possible that man gradually becomes a subject to algorithms that guide his daily interactions, determining what to read, what to see, and even how to think. This could lead to the creation of generations that lack the ability to interact with reality autonomously, as artificial intelligence becomes an essential intermediary between the individual, the world, and the outside environment, reinforcing its dependence on capital-controlled systems, corporations, and states.

This digital alienation is not limited to the productive aspect, but extends to a more dangerous level, which is the alienation of man from himself, from his consciousness, from his social relations, where his intellectual and cultural identity is transformed into a mere reflection of algorithms designed to serve the market.

The danger here is not limited to the loss of individual skills, but extends to the reshaping of collective consciousness in ways that are in line with the demands of the capitalist market. It weakens the ability of individuals to organize, resist, and demand radical change, by gradually pushing them into individual digital isolation, in which human interactions are reduced to platforms that control the flow of information and reshape social relations to serve the logic of domination.

Digital addiction

In this context, digital addiction emerges as one of the most serious effects of the expansion of artificial intelligence, as a scientific study conducted by researchers at the University of California in 2020 indicates that the excessive use of digital platforms and social media that rely on artificial intelligence algorithms causes changes in the brain similar to those caused by drug addiction, specifically in the areas responsible for making decisions and controlling behavior, as these algorithms are specifically designed to attract the attention of users and keep them connected for as long as possible.

Social media, entertainment apps, and other digital systems are not just platforms for services, but tools that are consciously used to promote behavioral and intellectual dependency, where big data is exploited to understand individuals’ motivations and manipulate them in ways that serve the economic interests of corporations and large countries. This digital addiction is not limited to wasting time or affecting productivity, but extends to creating a new type of alienation as a result of addiction, as individuals gradually lose their ability to live outside the digital framework. This can lead to poor concentration, decreased problem-solving skills, and impaired memory and direct human communication.

Capitalism exploits this addiction in multiple ways, investing in the development of technologies that stimulate addictive behavior to ensure that users continue to interact continuously with digital platforms in various forms, and this process turns into a vicious circle, where profits are generated by keeping individuals in a permanent state of passive consumption, which enhances its profits at the expense of mental and psychological health, especially among younger generations, and this may gradually erode their ability to think independently and work together.

A type of voluntary digital slavery

 Class dominance deepens through the transformation of artificial intelligence from a technological tool into a means of reproducing patterns of social, political, and economic control. The continuation of this model could lead to humanitarian disasters, as humans gradually lose their ability to face complex challenges and become hostage to technologies controlled by capitalist elites and major powers.

What makes this control even more dangerous is its voluntary nature, whereby individuals are driven by algorithmic manipulation and a desire for convenience to engage in this digital slavery without direct coercion. Man is given the illusion of control and choice, while his decisions are imperceptibly directed towards pre-orchestrated paths that serve the interests of capitalism. This submission does not stem from conscious conviction, but from an increasing reliance on technologies that constitute an artificial alternative to human relationships and autonomous mental processes, resulting in a state of digital dispossession, where individuals identify With their control tools instead of resisting it.

If this dynamic continues without a collective confrontation based on a progressive leftist consciousness, the current AI may gradually shift from a tool in the hands of capitalism to an alternative system of the human mind, through which daily life is managed, imposing a new form of voluntary digital slavery, in which individuals become trapped within technological systems that define their roles and behaviors, restrict their ability to make their decisions independently, and even push them to accept this domination as an inevitable reality that cannot be bypassed.

Machine rebellion and AI’s domination of humanity

Future projections have always painted pictures of a world in which humanity is controlled by a machine, where man loses control of the technology he has created, becoming a mere cog in a system that is not subject to his will, but serves the interests of the dominant powers. This scenario, which in the past was only philosophical assumptions or cinematic perceptions in science fiction films, is now more realistic in light of the tremendous developments of artificial intelligence and the absence of any effective international legal controls that regulate and frame its work.

One of the major and serious problems posed by the development of artificial intelligence is the possibility of developing itself beyond human intelligence, and turning it into an autonomous entity, beyond the control of humans, and even controlling them. As it transcends its original programming limits, artificial intelligence may become a system that makes fateful decisions independently, imposed on humanity in the economy, politics, daily life and others, without any human control. Under capitalism, artificial intelligence is being developed to serve the accumulation of capital and promote class domination and is subject to the logic of fierce competition, which makes losing control over it possible, potential, and dangerous, especially as it develops at a tremendous speed that exceeds the speed of its organization and framing within international laws and societal controls. It is designed as a tool with immense capabilities without any “cage” that limits its impunity if it is misused or spiraled out of control, which may turn it into an independent force that acts against the interests of society rather than serving it.

This scenario was no stranger to cinema, as many films addressed this idea, such as “The Destructor”, where machines start a war against humans after artificial intelligence reaches a level of self-awareness, “Matrix”, which shows a world in which humanity is enslaved by artificial intelligence that uses humans as energy sources, and “I, Robot”, which discusses the idea of robots rebelling against humans after they have acquired independent thinking abilities. The AI “rebellion” will not be just a fictional scenario, but its consequences will be reflected in policies imposed through digital systems, without any regard for human needs. What we are witnessing today is not the domination of robots over humans in the classical form imagined so far, but may evolve into a new model of digital control, based on comprehensive automation and algorithmic control of daily life, where societies become entities managed and controlled by intelligent systems and machines.Email

Rezgar Akrawi is a leftist researcher specializing in issues of technology and the left, working in the field of systems development and e-governance.