Monday, March 02, 2026

 

21st century vitamin hunters: A systematic framework for matching nutrients to genetic diseases




Arc Institute
Nutritional Genomics 

image: 

In this illustration, all 13 classical vitamins grow from a tree rooted in DNA, representing a nutritional genomics framework that connects genetic information to precision vitamin therapies. 

view more 

Credit: Chiara Ricci-Tam





By the 1890s, just as the medical world was beginning to understand that invisible microbes caused infectious diseases, the idea that a missing nutrient could kill you was even harder to fathom.

Then the evidence started piling up. Dutch physician Christiaan Eijkman noticed chickens fed polished rice developed beriberi-like paralysis, cured by adding back the husks. It was the first clue that what we now call vitamin B1 was essential. Naval ships were losing a third of their sailors to scurvy on long voyages. Give them citrus fruit, rich in vitamin C, and deaths dropped to zero.

Over the following decades, researchers began searching for other essential nutrients that the body can't produce on its own. They called them vitamins, and the 'vitamin hunters' who identified them saved millions of lives, earning over a dozen Nobel Prizes along the way. By 1948, all 13 classical vitamins were known.

With readily available vitamins, much of our food started getting supplemented. While this had the obvious benefit of reducing dietary deficiencies, one downside was that people stopped paying attention. Vitamins became something you could buy at the grocery store without a clear rationale of how much, why, or the underlying mechanism for their benefits. There are case reports of physicians giving patients vitamin cocktails for various diseases, and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. The literature is messy, but there are enough glimmers of hope that there's a real signal in there.

Our lab wants to tackle vitamins more systematically. In our new paper in Cell, we flip the traditional approach to finding cures. Instead of starting with one disease and spending a decade searching for a treatment, we start with a treatment that's already safe and accessible and ask: what are all the genetic diseases it can treat? 

A genome-wide screen for vitamin-treatable diseases

We started with vitamins B2 and B3 because they're common components of cell culture media that can easily be omitted or added. Taking advantage of this, we performed genome-wide CRISPR screens in K562 cancer cells in media with or without one of these B vitamins. We then consulted the OMIM database of known monogenic diseases to nominate candidates from the genes that grew well with the vitamin but poorly without it. This yielded a list of dozens of disease genes that could be rescued by high vitamin B2 or B3 levels.

For B2, the top hit was SLC52A2, a riboflavin transporter whose mutations cause Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere syndrome, a disorder already known to be treatable with high-dose riboflavin. Another top hit, FLAD1, also corresponds to a riboflavin-responsive condition. Two known positive controls sitting right at the top of our list told us the framework works.

But the screen also picked up GPX4, an enzyme that prevents a type of cell death called ferroptosis, which was unexpected. We validated the connection in cell culture and then in a mouse model, where GPX4-deficient mice on a B2-deficient diet showed accelerated motor decline. This represented a brand new vitamin-disease interaction.

NAXD and vitamin B3

From the vitamin B3 screen, the top hit was the NAXD gene. Mutations in it cause a very rare disease, not a lot of labs study NAXD, and it was completely new to us at the time. What we learned is pretty fascinating, and it led us on a years-long, often challenging, investigation.

The NAXD protein is a metabolic proofreading enzyme. Hundreds of enzymes rely on NAD/NADH (carriers of electrons for oxidation-reduction reactions) for everything from basic energy production to DNA repair. But sometimes, whether through mistakes by enzymes like GAPDH, or due to lower pH and increased temperature, NADH gets erroneously hydrated into something called NADHX. If that's not corrected, it can cyclize into a dead-end product called cyclic NADHX. These rogue metabolites can competitively block the enzymes that normally use NAD and NADH.

NAXD's job is to convert NADHX back to usable NADH, correcting the errors before they cause damage. If people lack NAXD function, they develop severe neurodevelopmental disease that is often fatal in early childhood, though the timeline varies depending on the mutation.

We validated the screen hit in cell culture first, finding that NAXD knockout cells grew poorly in B3-deficient media, and this phenotype was rescued by high B3. But cancer cells in a dish aren't representative of what happens in a living body. We needed an animal model, and no mouse model of NAXD disease existed. That had been a major roadblock for the field.

We used CRISPR to generate knockout mice with frameshift mutations in exon 2 of Naxd. The mice were born indistinguishable from their littermates, but within a day or two, their health deteriorated rapidly. 

Understanding and reversing NAXD disease

It was a challenge, but we optimized LC-MS methods to detect all the relevant metabolites — NAD, NADH, R-NADHX, S-NADHX, and cyclic NADHX. In the knockout mice, we saw massive accumulation of every form of NADHX across all tissues, while these metabolites were essentially undetectable in wild-type animals.

We were particularly intrigued to find that NAD was specifically depleted in the brain and skin, which is where the disease shows up in human patients. Other organs like liver, heart, and kidney had the error metabolites piling up but were maintaining their NAD levels. Why some tissues are more vulnerable than others is still something we're working to understand.

Broader metabolomics on knockout brains and MALDI-TOF imaging revealed that the most dramatically depleted compounds beyond NAD itself were serine and phosphoserine. Serine depletion was most severe in cortical regions of the brain. But single-nucleus RNA sequencing revealed that the most affected cell types weren't neurons. They were brain endothelial cells, mural cells, and astrocytes – the brain's vasculature. Endothelial cells showed a strong cell death signature that was completely reversed by B3 treatment.

That brought us back to our original question: can the vitamin actually treat this disease?

First we tested what happens when you remove it entirely. We put pregnant mothers on a B3-deficient diet. On regular chow, about a quarter of pups were knockouts, as expected. On the deficient diet, across about 70 pups, not a single knockout was born alive. 

Then we tried the opposite. Getting a vitamin to actually increase in the tissues of a tiny newborn mouse pup is harder than you'd think, and we spent over a year on this problem alone. But when we got it right, with daily intraperitoneal injections of nicotinamide riboside (one form of vitamin B3) starting at birth, the rescue was dramatic. Knockout mice were indistinguishable from their littermates at day 50 and beyond. Eight of nine treated animals continued to survive, more than a 40-fold improvement in lifespan. Every aspect of disease we measured was rescued, including body weight, brain pathology, cell death.

When we delayed treatment by just two days, postnatal day 2 instead of day 0, there was no benefit. That's why we advocate including NAXD in neonatal screening panels.

A new framework for vitamin biology

There are clinical case reports where NAXD patients were given supplements including vitamin B3 and some appeared to improve. Those are anecdotal, but they're consistent with what we've found. Translating the right dosing from mice to humans will require careful work, but we're eager to get these findings to the patient and clinical communities as quickly as possible.

We also hope this work inspires others to revisit vitamins with fresh eyes. We'd love some company doing this. Our screens nominated dozens of additional diseases that may respond to B2 or B3 therapy, and we've only tested two out of more than 50 known micronutrients. 

More broadly, we think the field should be thinking more creatively about therapies, not just developing drugs, but asking whether there are things we can change about how we live to treat disease. Whether it's what we breathe or what we eat.

Someday, maybe every newborn's genome gets sequenced at birth, and they receive custom dietary recommendations based on their genetics. We see this as picking up where the original vitamin hunters left off, bringing modern tools to the question of which vitamins can treat which diseases, and the mechanisms behind them.


Garg, A., Blume, S.Y., Huynh, H., Barrios, A.M., Karabulut, O.O., Zhao, Q., Midha, A.M., Turner, A., Resnick, B.V., Chen, X., Agrawal, A., Kim, J., Chen, L., Ran, Q., Ryan, A.M., Larson, R.C., Negahban, M., Nelson, S.C.K., Yang, A.C., Traglia, M., Thomas, R., Sun, R., Paredes, M., Corces, R., Lin, H., & Jain, I.H. (2026). Nutritional Genomics Uncovers Vitamin B3 Therapy as Curative for NAXD Disease. Cellhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.01.022


Authors:

  • Senior author Isha Jain (X: @ishahjain) is an Arc Institute Core Investigator, an Associate Investigator  at Gladstone Institutes and an Associate Professor at UCSF.
  • First authors:
    • Ankur Garg was a postdoctoral fellow in the Jain Lab at Gladstone Institutes and is now a staff scientist at Arc Institute
    • Skyler Blume is a Research Associate in the Jain Lab at Gladstone Institutes.

 

Scientists sharpen genetic maps to help pinpoint DNA changes that influence human health traits and disease risk



By rapidly testing hundreds of thousands of DNA sequences, scientists have identified specific genetic variations that contribute to blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, and more.



Jackson Laboratory

IMAGE: Functional dissection of complex trait variants at single-nucleotide resolution 

image: 

  

view more 

Credit: The Jackson Laboratory





Scientists have identified how specific genetic changes function in cells to influence disease risk and other human health traits. By probing regions of DNA previously linked to disease, the work has created high resolution maps of DNA variant activity, helping pinpoint the exact changes that shape blood pressure, cholesterol levels, blood sugar and other complex human traits.

The study, published today in Nature and led by researchers from The Jackson Laboratory (JAX), the Broad Institute, and Yale University, takes on a long-standing challenge in human genetics. Scientists have known for years that certain regions of the genome—often spanning tens of thousands to millions of DNA letters—are associated with diseases. But because these regions usually contain many variants that could potentially drive those associations, performing the necessary experiments to pinpoint which specific DNA changes truly matter has been difficult and time-consuming. 

The solution was scale. Using a method capable of testing thousands of such variants at once, the team tested more than 220,000 previously identified DNA changes in five different cell types. By doing so, they resolved about 20 percent of these regions across the genome, revealing new insights into what these variants do, which in turn can help improve risk prediction and guide the development of new therapies.    

“For nearly two decades, genetic studies have identified where in the genome we need to look for disease risk, but not which specific DNA changes are responsible,” said Ryan Tewhey, a geneticist and an associate professor who led the team at JAX. “Our study helps close this gap by working at the scale needed to confidently pinpoint the specific DNA changes that matter across thousands of regions all at once, rather than one by one.”

Tewhey explained that previously making these connections was like searching for a single typo on one page of a massive book. This experimental approach is akin to speed reading, scanning thousands of pages at once and flagging the exact letters that change meaning, dramatically accelerating genetic discovery.

“What excites me is that this is a bridge from association to biology," said Layla Siraj, first author of the study, which she spearheaded while in the Lander Lab at the Broad Institute, and now in her residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University/New York Presbyterian. “By uncovering the patterns underlying how single-letter changes affect gene regulation, we can start mechanistically connecting genetic risk to the pathways therapies could target.”

In addition to Tewhey and Siraj, the study was co-led by Jacob Ulirsch, currently a group leader at Illumina. Key authors also include Steven Reilly, assistant professor at Yale School of Medicine; and Hilary Finucane, associate member at the Broad Institute and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital.

Building a foundation for better disease risk prediction 

Most DNA changes linked to common diseases like heart disease and type 2 diabetes occur not within genes themselves—which only constitute about 2 percent of the genome—but in the vast stretches of non-coding DNA, where regulatory elements exist that control when, where and how strongly our genes are expressed. Genetic studies conducted over the last two decades have identified millions of such non-coding disease-related variants throughout the genome. The challenge has been identifying which of the many single-letter changes in these regulatory DNA regions affect gene activity, fine-tuning protein production and in turn shaping disease risk.

To meet this challenge, the researchers used a technology called a massively parallel reporter assay, which allowed them to test the effects of more than 220,000 single-letter DNA variants at the same time across different cell types, including brain, liver and blood cells. Each stretch of DNA was paired with a molecular tag, or reporter, that they could directly measure to see whether a variant increased, decreased, or had no effect on gene activity—an important step in understanding how regulatory DNA changes may affect health.

The results revealed over 13,000 single-letter variants that influence how strongly a gene is expressed. While most act independently, the team found that about 11 percent behaved differently than expected when combined with a nearby variant. This surprising result suggests some genetic risk of disease depends on specific combinations of variants whose whole is greater than the sum of its parts. 

These insights revealed potential links to human health. In some cases, pairs of variants were associated with gene activity linked to lower levels of LDL, or “bad” cholesterol. Other combinations appear to affect a gene associated with blood pressure. The team also identified two variants near the ESS2 gene--associated with developmental disorders--whose combined effect on gene expression was greater than would be expected from either variant alone.

Improving equity in genetics-driven advances

In another example, the researchers pinpointed a single variant associated with long-term blood sugar control discovered in people of European ancestry. Based on its molecular behavior, they predicted that similar but previously understudied variants, found predominantly in people of African ancestry, would show a similar association. Follow-up analysis confirmed that prediction, underscoring the importance of understanding genetic mechanisms across diverse populations. 

While the study identified which DNA variants regulate specific protein-coding genes in the brain, liver and blood cells, additional experiments will be needed to determine how those variants ultimately influence traits and disease risk. Given the body’s many tissues and thousands of distinct cell types, switching genes on or off in a single cell type is only one piece of a much larger puzzle in determining health outcomes. In addition, millions of genetic variants remain untested. Even so, the researchers say the findings can already begin strengthening how scientists study genetic variation and how they influence health traits.

“These findings do more than explain known disease associations. They provide training data to build predictive models of the effects of variants we haven’t yet studied or that remain undiscovered,” Tewhey said.

Tewhey, Reilly, and their colleagues recently created such a model with this data. Published in Nature in 2024, they used this model to design synthetic DNA sequences that could selectively turn genes on in distinct tissue types one at a time. It also builds on works Tewhey and Ulirsch published in 2016 while colleagues at Broad. Together, these advances point toward a future where genetic risk can be more accurately predicted and where therapies can be designed to act only in the tissues where they are needed most.  

 

Firearm mortality and equitable access to trauma care in Chicago




JAMA Surgery





About The Study: 

Strategic placement of a trauma center in an area with high rates of violent injury and limited trauma care access was associated with significantly reduced mortality within the service area. These findings should inform trauma system planning to address geographic disparities in trauma care access, particularly in communities with high rates of penetrating trauma. 



Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Michael R. Poulson, MD, MPH, email michael.poulson@uchicagomedicine.org.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2026.0001)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.0001?guestAccessKey=aefb6104-971d-42d0-adac-5d6f2fbea82a&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=022526

 

New research sheds light on why eczema so often begins in childhood




The Mount Sinai Hospital / Mount Sinai School of Medicine





[New York, NY [February 25, 2026]—A team of researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Weill Cornell Medicine, and other institutions have uncovered a key biological explanation for why eczema so often starts in childhood. The study, in young mice, found that some types of immune cells in early-life skin are more reactive than those in adults, a difference that may help explain why children are more vulnerable to inflammation and allergic skin disease.    

The findings suggest that early childhood represents a critical window for immune-driven skin disease and may shed light on why eczema is often the first condition in a broader pattern of allergic disease. They were reported in the February 25 online issue of Nature [DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10162-x].

Eczema affects nearly one in four children and often appears early in life. It can also precede other allergic conditions, including asthma and food allergies. Until now, scientists have not fully understood why the disease is so strongly linked to early childhood.

“We found that allergy risk is shaped very early in life, when the skin’s immune system is biologically programmed to overreact to allergens, with important consequences for understanding how immune-mediated diseases emerge and should be treated,” says senior study author Shruti Naik, PhD, Associate Professor of Immunology and Immunotherapy, and Dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine. “By pinpointing the cells and hormonal signals that control this window of vulnerability, we open the door to strategies that could prevent allergic disease before it spreads from the skin to the lungs, gut, and beyond.”

The researchers discovered that a specific immune cell type, the dendritic cell, in young skin behaves differently than in adults. These cells do not overreact to everything—but when it comes to allergens, they respond faster and more strongly, setting the stage for inflammation and eczema early in life. In adult skin, the same cells are far less reactive.

To understand why allergies often start in early childhood, researchers exposed infant mice to everyday allergens such as dust mites and mold. Unlike adult mice, the infants developed strong skin inflammation, revealing a brief early-life period when the skin’s immune system is especially sensitive.

The scientists traced this response to dendritic cells, which are unusually active shortly after birth and triggers allergic inflammation. When this pathway was blocked, the young mice did not develop skin allergies.

The team also found that infants lack normal levels of stress hormones that later help keep immune reactions in check, allowing these allergic responses to take hold. Importantly, signs of the same immune activity were found in skin samples from children with early-onset eczema, but not in adults, suggesting this early-life window may also be important in humans.

“This work was only possible through a true clinic-to-lab collaboration—where insights from pediatric patients shaped the questions we asked in the lab,” says study co-author Emma Guttman-Yassky, MD, PhD, the Waldman Professor of Dermatology and Immunology and Health System Chair of the Kimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine. “By studying allergic disease where it actually begins, in early life, and by modeling clinically relevant allergens and disease features, lead author Yue Xing, PhD, uncovered immune biology that simply doesn’t appear in adult models. By revealing what’s unique about the early-life immune system, this work explains why eczema so often begins in infancy.”

Next, the investigators plan to explore ways to block this early-life immune pathway to stop allergic disease before it spreads from the skin to other organs. 

“Beyond eczema, this study reinforces a critical point for medicine,” says Dr. Naik. “Children are not simply small adults when it comes to immunity. Their immune system follows a unique set of rules, and recognizing that difference is essential for understanding—and ultimately preventing—allergic, immune-driven diseases that begin in childhood.”

The paper is titled “Peripheral immune-inducer(pii)-DCs drive early life allergic inflammation.”

The study’s authors, as listed in the journal, are Yue Xing, Ilana Reznikov, Abonti Nur Ahmed, Ikjot Sidhu, Jill Wisnewski, Asma Farhat, Aleksandr Prystupa, Piotr Konieczny, Kody Mansfield, Melissa L. Cooper, Stephen T. Yeung, Madeline Kim, Sophia Adeghe, Katherine D. Gaines, Meredith Manson, JiHyun Sim, Qingrong Huang, Ata S. Moshiri, Kamal M. Khanna, Theresa Lu, Emma, Guttman-Yassky, Amanda W. Lund, Niroshana Anandasabapathy, and Shruti Naik.

For details on funding and competing interests, please see the paper Nature.

-####-

About the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is internationally renowned for its outstanding research, educational, and clinical care programs. It is the sole academic partner for the seven member hospitals* of the Mount Sinai Health System, one of the largest academic health systems in the United States, providing care to New York City’s large and diverse patient population.   

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai offers highly competitive MD, PhD, MD-PhD, and master’s degree programs, with enrollment of more than 1,200 students. It has the largest graduate medical education program in the country, with more than 2,600 clinical residents and fellows training throughout the Health System. Its Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences offers 13 degree-granting programs, conducts innovative basic and translational research, and trains more than 560 postdoctoral research fellows.  

Ranked 11th nationwide in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is among the 99th percentile in research dollars per investigator according to the Association of American Medical Colleges.  More than 4,500 scientists, educators, and clinicians work within and across dozens of academic departments and multidisciplinary institutes with an emphasis on translational research and therapeutics. Through Mount Sinai Innovation Partners (MSIP), the Health System facilitates the real-world application and commercialization of medical breakthroughs made at Mount Sinai. 

-------------------------------------------------------  

* Mount Sinai Health System member hospitals: The Mount Sinai Hospital; Mount Sinai Brooklyn; Mount Sinai Morningside; Mount Sinai Queens; Mount Sinai South Nassau; Mount Sinai West; and New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai