Showing posts sorted by date for query AI DATA CENTERS. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query AI DATA CENTERS. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, October 06, 2026

Mayor to homeowner losing sleep over data center plant: "Consider selling"

Lauren Fichten
Updated Mon, October 5, 2026

It was 4 a.m. on a Sunday and 46-year-old Jason Haley was once again wide awake.

The suburban silence that Haley had grown used to in his two decades as a resident of Southaven, Mississippi, had, for the last few months, been replaced by a constant whirring, like an airplane hovering over his home, he said.

The noise keeping Haley awake was coming from a plant powering Elon Musk's xAI data centers in the area, according to a lawsuit filed in June against the company and its subsidiary, MZX Tech. Haley and two other Southaven residents, who live within a mile of the plant, allege in the suit that "near-constant" noise and vibrations are causing negative physical and psychological health effects.

The filing comes amid growing resistance toward data center development, with the majority of Americans opposing local construction of a data center, according to a Gallup poll published earlier this year.

Similar disputes are playing out across the country, like in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, where a lawsuit this month filed by residents alleges a data center emits "unreasonable and excessive noise" onto residents' properties and in Lowell, Massachusetts, where noise from a data center's cooling center "disrupts neighbors' sleep," according to an April suit.

There are more than 4,000 data centers in the U.S., according to a recent United Nations report. To power the data centers, developers are building their own plants, sometimes with little warning to residents like Haley.

Haley reached out to Southaven Mayor Darren Musselwhite about the noise in emails he shared with CBS News. In one last November, he urged Musselwhite to drive through the neighborhood "and take a listen to the constant high pitch noises."

"I am aware of the noise and working on a solution with xAI officials," Musselwhite had responded to Haley an hour later. "It is a problem," he said in another email later in the day.

But soon, another sleepless night rolled around and Haley was emailing the mayor again.

"Anyone else I can reach out to?" Haley wrote to Musselwhite. "It's almost 4 am and I can hear it from my bed. The high pitch and roaring combined is full force at this time. My ears are ringing. I can't live in this. How was this ever approved?"
"I don't care that this is Elon's project"

Just north of Southaven, which sits on the Mississippi-Tennessee border, xAI's data center Colossus went online in Memphis in September 2024. The company dubbed it "the world's largest AI supercomputer."

By late July 2025, Musk was announcing that another data center, Colossus 2, was set to begin operation in the area within weeks.

Days later, an announcement popped into the Facebook feeds of Southaven residents: An energy facility that had been dormant for decades will be revived to support xAI's expanding data center operations in the area, Musselwhite said.

The post was met by a flood of comments, with some lauding the development and others expressing concern about the plant's impact on the environment and strain on local resources.

Meanwhile, Haley started hearing sounds.

"My first thought was somebody's got a leaf blower going all the time," he said.

By December, the noise had become a fixture. He started getting headaches, stopped getting sleep and slipped into feelings of hopelessness and depression. The noise was inescapable, he said, and despite his best efforts to drown it out (sleeping with earplugs, getting a box fan for white noise), it continued to drone on.

So Haley began speaking up — at city government meetings, on Facebook and through TikTok, where he posts videos of himself measuring the noise with a sound meter. He later became involved in a grassroots coalition called Safe and Sound, drawing awareness to concerns surrounding xAI's undertakings in the region.

The "activist" label is one he's reluctantly accepted.

"I've never been into any kind of activism, never really kept up with politics a whole lot," he said. "I'm just a guy that has a problem with this noise, and started speaking out and trying to raise awareness."

When he emailed Musselwhite about the noise again in December, his message came with a disclosure: "I am not a republican or democrat, I don't care that this is Elon's project. I didn't know whose it was when I started complaining about the noise that started in August."

Musselwhite responded a few days later.

"As I mentioned to you in the public meeting, you seem to be a reasonable person," he said. "I will give you some unsolicited advice from an older man, be careful with whom you associate so you don't damage your credibility."

By January, xAI was expanding its footprint with a third data center in Southaven, MACROHARDDR. As residents like Haley continued pushing back online and in city meetings, Musselwhite had a new message.

Southaven, he said in a Facebook post, was "under attack by all who choose to oppose Elon Musk because of his high-profile political stances." He warned residents to "beware of the smokescreen of radical politics."

In his emails to Haley, Musselwhite continued to acknowledge the noise as a problem.

"The noise issue is one of my highest priorities and I have been in detailed discussions with xAI and many independent professionals to resolve this," he wrote in March.

But in the same email, he offered Haley more advice: "I know they want houses for employees, so you may want to consider selling your home."

CBS News made multiple attempts to speak with Musselwhite and did not receive a reply.
Migraines, ringing ears and sleepless nights

Moving isn't Haley's preference, but he said he is in the financial position to do so if he chooses.

That's not the case for everyone.

A little over a decade ago, 31-year-old Taylor Logsdon bought a home for her growing family in Southaven and began building her life around it.

"We loved it here," she said. "It was peaceful, it was quiet, didn't have to worry about nothing."

But that was before the noise, so loud, she said, that it sometimes shakes her home. Logsdon, who is also involved in the Safe and Sound coalition and is suing xAI with Haley and one other Southaven resident, said she has experienced migraines and anxiety as a result of the noise.

She said she has persistent ringing in her ears and so do her children. A full night of sleep has become rare for the family.

"I would move tomorrow if I could," she said, adding that she needs to save money before she can afford to move.

Her children, all under the age of 13, are having trouble staying awake at school.

"One of them is extra angry all the time — never, never has been that way, but he's just irritable like all the time," she said. "I feel like I'm snappier too."

xAI spent millions of dollars trying to mitigate the sound with a sound wall, a berm and evergreen trees, Musselwhite said in a February Facebook post.

"It still hasn't helped. It hasn't even put a dent in it," Logsdon said.

People living in areas where there is "constant humming or buzzing" report headaches, stress and sleep disturbance, said Dr. Samoon Ahmad, a clinical professor of psychiatry at New York University.

A 2023 study found that environmental noise exposure can lead to adverse associations for cardiovascular disease and mortality, diabetes, hearing impairment, neurological disorders and adverse reproductive outcomes.

"People think of annoyance as an abstract term," Ahmad said. "It's not an abstract term because it has real physiological ramifications."

The World Health Organization recommends less than 40 decibels of annual average nighttime noise outside of bedrooms to prevent adverse health effects. Haley has recorded noise levels over 60 decibels as late as 10:15 p.m. from his Southaven backyard.
Musk's Memphis

Even before Logsdon and Haley decided to take action against xAI, Musk's growing presence in the Memphis area garnered attention from advocacy groups over health and environmental concerns.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People filed a lawsuit in April against xAI claiming the Southaven plant emits "significant" amounts of harmful pollutants from its 27 gas turbines, which has since increased to 59, according to a court filing reviewed by CBS News. The NAACP has also filed an appeal to challenge the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality's decision to issue an air permit allowing the Southaven plant to operate 41 permanent methane gas turbines. A study found their operation would increase air pollution in an area already grappling with a disproportionate number of asthma-related emergency room visits. The study was commissioned by the Southern Environmental Law Center, which is co-counsel for the plaintiffs.

CBS News has reached out to xAI for comment.

Musk's investment in the latest Southaven data center brings his company's contribution to the area to $20 billion, according to the office of Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves. The governor called it "the largest economic development project in Mississippi's history."

Musk's financial footprint has also extended beyond the data centers — MZX Tech donated over $1.3 million to the Southaven Police Department in February, according to the donation agreement obtained by CBS News, and has offered half-priced Starlink for those in the Memphis region.

But Logsdon says the cost to her and her family's health has her wondering why it feels like her city is willing to "hurt the few to get the benefits."

"We were not a failure town before," Logsdon said. "It's not like our economics were terrible here."

Southaven had a median household income of over $70,000 in 2024, according to the U.S. Census Bureau — $20,000 more than the state average.

Logsdon, currently a stay-at-home mom, will be searching for work this fall so she and her husband can start saving up to move away from the plant. For now, her goal is a full night's sleep.

"I hope that my family can go back to having our normal," she said. "Being able to sleep at night, being able to enjoy my backyard, being able to go swimming."

Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional background on the study commissioned by the Southern Environmental Law Center.

Comment summary
Comments include criticism of the mayor’s advice to homeowners to sell amid data center disruptions, with many alleging local officials are influenced by corporate interests and ignoring community harm. Other comments point to widespread distrust of data centers’ environmental and social impacts and calls for political accountability.
Views expressed are from commenters only.
‘Halt the Out-of-Control Tech Oligarchs’: Advocates Demand Data Center Moratorium in Washington State

“Wherever there is resistance to this industry, more people learn that they are not powerless and that they can play a role in determining what happens in their community and with the future of AI and data centers,” one organizer said.



Demonstrators call for a statewide moratorium on data centers in Spokane, Washington, on October 4, 2026.
(Photo by Sandra Rivera)


Olivia Rosane
Oct 06, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

As the national backlash against hyperscale data centers and the artificial intelligence they power grows, hundreds of people turned out to 19 events across Washington state on Sunday as part of a day of action to demand a statewide moratorium on data centers.

The call for a Washington-wide pause builds on momentum at the city and county level, as Seattle became the largest US city to halt the data center buildout in June, followed by other major municipalities including Spokane and Tacoma’s Pierce County.



Trump Pushes AI Data Centers on Public Land as Big Tech Reaps Billions in Tax Breaks


Several of the communities that organized events on Sunday are also trying to stop projects already planned in their backyards. But concerned residents across the state—mobilized under the banner of Washington AI Resistance (WAAIR) in partnership with several other environmental and public interest organizations—want state-level protections to ensure that no community falls through the regulatory cracks. To do that, they aimed to raise their voices louder than the powerful Big Tech lobby in a state where both Microsoft and Amazon have headquarters.

“Communities have a right to determine which industries get to move into their backyards.”

“We need to demonstrate to candidates and sitting legislators that there is real public demand for a data center moratorium in every corner of the state,” Evan Sutton, a Seattle-based activist with WAAIR, told Common Dreams.

Lauren Redfield, WAAIR president and co-chair of the Seattle Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) Ecosocialism working group, said the day of action was significant “because it demonstrates wide-ranging support from diverse communities across Washington that people are angry about data centers.”

“Communities have a right to clean air, clean water, affordable energy. Communities have a right to determine which industries get to move into their backyards. Representatives who are more responsive to the tech industry than their community constituents, who are allowing data centers to drive up electricity prices and pollute air, water, and land systems—these representatives are going to be held accountable,” Redfield told Common Dreams.

Seattle

Evan Sutton (left) helps hold a sign reading, "Stop AI Data Centers."
 (Photo by Olivia Rosane)

In Seattle, activists held four separate events over the course of the day: one at a freeway bridge in the north of the city, another in West Seattle, a third outside the light rail station in the south Seattle neighborhood of Beacon Hill, and a fourth at a central square of the University of Washington.

Sutton, who organized the north Seattle action, said it was important to look beyond local regulations and stand in solidarity with communities across the state.

“In the end our natural resources are shared by everyone,” he told Common Dreams, explaining that Seattle’s moratorium might push developers to look to unincorporated parts of the county, and if Seattle’s King County passed a moratorium, they would then turn to other parts of the state.

“We shouldn’t have to play whack-a-mole with billionaire developers and AI tech bros,” Sutton said as passing cars honked in support of the protest. “Our legislature should step up and pass rules that everybody has to follow everywhere in the state.”


Thomas Meyer, the deputy political director of Food & Water Watch, who led a group of 10 volunteers in distributing flyers and gathering signatures for a moratorium in Beacon Hill, said that “data centers in Seattle are most likely to be proposed in the south end or in nearby cities like Tukwila, Burien, and Renton. Just like in other parts of the state and the country, data centers are more often proposed in areas with larger populations of people of color.”

Indeed, a study by Washington environmental justice group Front and Centered found that 57% of the data centers it surveyed were placed in census tracts with the highest proportion of people of color.



“It’s important to pass a data center moratorium to protect Washington residents from the pollution and extraction from these facilities, and to prevent big tech companies from further concentrating their wealth and power at our expense,” Meyer told Common Dreams.

Wenatchee


Passersby mark down if they do or do not want a data center moratorium in Wenatchee, Washington. (Image via WAAIR)

In Wenatchee in central Washington, concerned residents gathered by the Loop Trail along the Columbia River and asked passersby if they would like to see a data center moratorium.

“We had them sign their initials on a poster board under ‘YES’ or ‘NO,’ one of the organizers explained. ”During the time that we were there, we collected 24 ‘YESes’ and zero ‘NOs.’“

The activists plan to bring the board to a meeting with Chelan County Commissioner Kevin Overbay on Wednesday to oppose data centers in Malaga, an unincorporated community in the county.

“Malaga is ground zero for hyperscale data centers in Chelan County, and currently hosts a 288 megawatt Microsoft data center,” the organizer said. “We want to show Overbay that the Wenatchee community as a whole does not want to see any more data centers. The Columbia is the lifeblood of our community. It provides us with power as well as water. These resources do not belong to private corporations like Microsoft to use as they please.”

While Wenatchee is focused on the county fight, a statewide moratorium would ease their efforts.

“A statewide moratorium would save us from having to spend our time fighting for a moratorium on a county-wide level,” the organizer said. “We could spend our time fighting instead for long-term protections to ensure that our region is permanently protected from exploitation.”

Olympia

A protester holds a sign reading, "Pause AI Data Center Ban Now" in Olympia, Washington. (Photo by Tina Simcich)

In Olympia, the state capital, activists gathered to put pressure on state Rep. Beth Doglio (D-22). Doglio introduced a bill in the 2026 legislative session with some basic data center regulations that was watered down due to pressure from the tech lobby before dying in committee. Protesters wanted Doglio to know she would have public support to back a moratorium and push for stronger regulations.

“Washington needs to halt the out-of-control tech oligarchs with a moratorium on data center construction,” said Tina Simcich of Olympia DSA. “Working-class jobs and our land, water, energy, and air resources must be protected from this greed-driven grab.”

Walla Walla

Walla Walla residents participate in a day of action for a data center moratorium on October 4, 2026. (Photo by Allison Carney

In Walla Walla, residents are mobilizing to stop a planned Amazon data center after the Port of Walla Walla sold land to the company in the nearby Wallula Gap.

“Everyone has their own concerns” about the proposed data center—which is projected to use as much power as Seattle–Allison Carney, a member of the Walla Walla Anti Data Center League, told Common Dreams, “whether it be not knowing if their power bills are going to go up, not knowing if their land is going to be seized through eminent domain,” water pollution and availability, noise, light, and the fact that it will be located near the McNary National Wildlife Refuge and could potentially harm endangered wildlife.

However, she said, “The biggest thing that unites everyone’s concerns is the fact that we don’t trust Amazon. We don’t trust this company coming into our community. We don’t trust that they’re going to be doing what’s best for us. We trust that they’re going to do what’s best for their profits.”

Beginning at 2:00 pm PT on Sunday, around 60 people attended a rally and march in downtown Walla Walla to the County Office of Community Development, where Community Development Department Director Melissa Shumake will determine whether to require a full environmental impact statement for the project, something community members are demanding.



A statewide pause would assist in their efforts by increasing the chance that any data center would be governed by stronger rules to protect the community and environment.

“A statewide moratorium would give time for regulators to catch up with this industry,” Carney said.



Spokane


People march against data centers in Spokane, Washington. (Photo by Sandra Rivera)

The largest action of the day took place starting at 3:30 pm PT in Spokane, where 150 people marched from Riverfront Park, past the City Hall and the Public Works Building where the County Commission meets, and back to the park to say, “This is what we’re fighting for: our river,” Zenthia Peterson, the lead organizer for the event, told Common Dreams.

Demonstrators, including members of WAAIR, 350 Spokane, the Visibility Brigade, West Plains Water Coalition, and long-time local environmental campaigner Terry Horne, demanded statewide action but also expressed concern about how local data centers would impact a region already under pressure from the climate crisis. The march came about two months after a devastating wildfire scorched Spokane in August, destroying homes and forcing 600,000 to evacuate. Locals are concerned that a large data center could deplete the water resources needed to fight the next blaze.

“We’re doing a march tomorrow to save the literal world.”

In particular, activists are watching a 1,000-megawatt project slated for the nearby community of Airway Heights, outside the bounds of the city moratorium. While Spokane County has also announced a pause, it ends in December. It is unclear whether it will be extended, and the ordinance that was supposed to follow it has been delayed.

These concerns make a statewide moratorium all the more important, Peterson said, as that “would protect us even if the county sits on their asses.”

Organizers had intended to have participants call Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson to demand state action, only to discover the night before that he had turned off his voicemail. Peterson encouraged participants to call him during the week instead.

“My speech was quite literally, ‘May you get bit back tenfold,” Peterson said, referring to Ferguson.

Jeremiah Harding, who organizes with WAAIR and the Spokane Community Organized Response Network, also decried the use of AI technology for layoffs, mass surveillance, and military targeting.

“We’re doing a march tomorrow to save the literal world,” Harding told Common Dreams the night before the protest.

He continued: “It’s bad enough that it pollutes the environment and fills the air with noise, while draining our water and destroying local homes. It’s bad enough that Spokane just had the single largest fire in our history, and we need all the water we can get. But the technology itself is also used to disempower, leech, destroy, and kill people.”


Moving Forward



Demonstrators call for AI regulations in Tacoma, Washington. (Photo by Visibility Brigade)

Now that the day of action has passed, WAAIR will continue to put pressure on state lawmakers and Gov. Ferguson, Sutton told Common Dreams. After the November election, activists will also seek out lawmakers to sponsor moratorium legislation and other AI regulations while “pushing forward with future actions that people can take to make sure that legislators understand this isn’t an issue they can ignore.”

At the same time, organizers realize that the actions in Washington are part of a national struggle.

Meyer of Food & Water Watch said Washington was “one of dozens of states with active grassroots campaigns against data centers. Wherever there is resistance to this industry, more people learn that they are not powerless and that they can play a role in determining what happens in their community and with the future of AI and data centers.”

Within that broader movement, Washington may have a unique role to play, Sutton said.

“As the home of Microsoft and Amazon and a state that is deeply tied to Big Tech, if we can achieve this here, then I think it creates momentum for states everywhere else to believe that they can do the same,” he told Common Dreams.


Editor’s note: Olivia Rosane is a member of WAAIR and Seattle DSA.
Musk's data centers push out family that's owned land for generations

Lauren Fichten
Mon, October 5, 2026
CBS NEWS

On a 2-acre property in Mississippi, 52-year-old Krystal Polk's family lived off the land for generations, raising chickens and pigs, growing onions and herbs and trading their peaches for pears.

The land, on the border with Tennessee in the city of Southaven, was her family's survival, Polk said. "We lived a very simplistic life," she told CBS News.

While life there may have been simple in Polk's view, the circumstances surrounding her home rarely ever were. Her family acquired the property "before people of color were allowed to have land," she said, and it's been passed down for four generations. When Polk's parents first moved in, they discovered "KKK" scrawled at the bottom of the hill of their property, she said.

Holding on to the land was made more difficult a year ago when a noisy neighbor appeared across the street — a power plant so loud, it drove the family away. Since then, the land has sat mostly empty, occupied only by an unrelenting hum.

The plant, which is powering Elon Musk's SpaceXAI data centers in the Memphis area, has sparked backlash from Southaven residents concerned about noise and air pollution. A petition by the resident-run Safe and Sound Coalition calling to shut down the power plant has over 1,400 signatures.

Polk said she remembers when she could hear the birds chirping at her family home. Now, she said the plant's "constant roaring" lingers in her ears even after she leaves.

"It's like you're in the middle of the airport where the planes are taking off, but they never take off," she said.

SpaceXAI, formerly known as xAI, recently said in a July press release that it is investing millions of dollars in sound walls and silencers with "advanced quieting technologies" around the plant. Southaven residents have told CBS News that one sound wall installed so far has provided little reprieve from the noise.


Krystal Polk and her cousin on the family property in Southaven, Mississippi, in an undated photo. / Credit: Krystal Polk
"We gathered there"

Over the course of two years, Musk has expanded his footprint in the Memphis region starting with the construction of his Colossus 1 data center just north of Southaven in 2024. By January 2026, two more data centers were announced. This July, Musk quietly confirmed the construction of another local data center, "Minihard," in a reply to a post on his platform X.

Musk's SpaceXAI projects will total more than $20 billion in investments to Southaven, which Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves said in a press release will "bring amazing opportunities to its residents for generations."

But for Polk, the development has meant a new kind of strain on her family.

"We don't know the future," she said. "So we're not sure what to invest into it."

Polk moved away from the family home after getting married, and for years, it bounced between relatives. It was where Polk churned her own ice cream as a child, held her rehearsal dinner when she got married and hosted the holidays each year.

"We gathered there and we thanked God for what we had," she said. "It was always a celebration."


Krystal Polk and her cousins when they were children at the family's home in Southaven, Mississippi. / Credit: Krystal Polk

She planned to return as a retiree and eventually pass the property down to her children. But now, those plans have been put on hold. Apart from the "24/7" noise, Polk said she and her family have asthma and are concerned about fumes from the gas turbines at the plant.

"I'm afraid that we will be the ones that everyone looks back on and says, 'Hey, remember they tried to tell us that these things were hazardous to our health and causing harm,'" Polk said. "I'm afraid that we're going to be those casualties."

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and other groups sued xAI and its subsidiary MZX Tech in April, alleging that the plant "emits significant amounts of harmful pollutants."

In June, SpaceXAI filed a motion to dismiss the case, and the Department of Justice also moved to intervene and dismiss the case. The Justice Department said in a statement that the matter "concerns national security and Mississippi's lawful action regarding permitting" and that the NAACP's lawsuit "could hinder the War Department's use of AI for national defense."

CBS News reached out to SpaceXAI multiple times for comment and has not heard back.

The company has entered into an agreement with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality that includes removing the 69 temporary turbines at the plant and replacing them with 41 permanent turbines over the course of a year.

But a study conducted by EmPower Analytics Group found that the plan to install dozens of gas turbines would increase air pollution in the area and would be concentrated in communities that are disproportionately Black. The study was commissioned by the Southern Environmental Law Center, which is co-counsel for the plaintiffs in the NAACP's lawsuit against xAI and MZX Tech.

The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality said in a statement that it doesn't comment on "third-party reports or matters involved in pending litigation" and that it "remains committed to carrying out its responsibility to protect public health and the environment through implementation and enforcement of applicable state and federal environmental laws and regulations."

MDEQ said that as part of the permitting process, MZX Tech was required to demonstrate that the proposed facility would not violate air quality standards.


The plant in Southaven, Mississippi, powers data centers in the region. / Credit: Lauren Fichten

Still, residents are not convinced. Shannon Samsa, a 27-year-old physician assistant living in Southaven, is concerned about the plant's impact on her community's health. She's become an outspoken advocate against the plant, speaking up at city meetings and leading the Safe and Sound Coalition as its director.

"It's not just my neighbors, it's not just my family and friends, it's my future patients," she said. "It's also a huge healthcare issue."
Priceless property

As SpaceXAI extends its reach in the region, the future of Polk's property hangs in the balance. Some companies have expressed interest in purchasing it.

Polk said she was approached by real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield Commercial Advisors with an offer. After multiple "nos" over the course of weeks, she said she eventually filed a Better Business Bureau complaint, accusing the company of harassment and manipulation.

In the complaint, reviewed by CBS News, Polk alleged the firm tried to coerce her into agreeing to services.

Cushman & Wakefield Commercial Advisors, in response to the complaint, said it was exploring the potential acquisition of Polk's land on behalf of a client, who was not identified. The firm confirmed it made multiple attempts to contact Polk "by phone, text and written correspondence," but denied engaging in "harassment, pressure tactics, or inappropriate conduct."

Polk said the company has not reached out since she filed the complaint. She declined to disclose the firm's offer, but said that "it was not worth anything."

Selling the land is complicated — keeping it was her father's dying wish, Polk said.

"He asked me to please keep it as much as I could within reason," she said. "I'm not sure if you could offer a value."

Editor's note: This story has been updated to clarify the name of the real estate firm. It has also been updated with additional background on the study commissioned by the Southern Environmental Law Center.


A Texas Woman Is Fighting to Stop a Data Center From Replacing a Promised Park

C. da Costa
Mon, October 5, 2026 


Image: Joel Angel Juarez via CNN


Key takeaways

Central Texas land originally sold for $10 in 1999 with a promise to become public parkland, now sold for $10 million to a data-center developer, sparking a legal battle over the enforceability of the original deed language.


Eighty-seven acres of Central Texas land changed hands in 1999 for $10, with written language stating it would become public parkland. In April 2025, that same land sold for $10 million to a data-center developer. Whether the original deed language carries any continuing legal force is now the central question before a Texas appeals court and the state's attorney general.

The 1999 transfer conveyed the property from the Bland family to the Texas Parks and Recreation Foundation, with language stating the land was "to be held in trust for future use as parkland." That language was absent from every subsequent deed. The City of Taylor says no legally enforceable restriction attached to the property, while Pamela Griffin filed suit arguing that the restriction remains enforceable.

A Promise in the Deed

The property passed through public and nonprofit hands for more than two decades before landing with a data-center developer.

According to the Texas Attorney General's office, the land moved from the Texas Parks and Recreation Foundation to a Williamson County parks nonprofit in 2003. Shortly after, it transferred to the City of Taylor. In 2009, the city transferred it to the Taylor Economic Development Corporation for $15,000 and 39 acres.

The economic development corporation sold the remaining parcel to NCP Travis TPP Project LLC, the entity associated with Blueprint Data Centers, for $10 million in April 2025. Griffin's opposition extends beyond the legal question. Her grandmother, Addie Collins, bought property on Taylor's south side after the Fair Housing Act prohibited housing discrimination, acquiring parcels for all eight of her children to build multigenerational economic security, according to CNN reporting.

Fannie Robinson Park, the first park serving Black residents in Taylor, had previously been a city dump and was associated with illness and rashes among neighborhood children, residents have said. The vacant lot near Griffin's family home served as an informal playground for generations, according to CNN. "My daddy passed this land down to us and he told us to guard this land," Griffin told CNN.

What Gets Built There

Blueprint Projects has received development approval for a three-building data center complex planned in phases on approximately 52 acres.

Blueprint Projects has approval for three data-center buildings totaling roughly 135,000 square feet, built in three 45,000-square-foot phases with an on-site electricity substation, according to Data Center Dynamics. The facility would sit roughly 500 feet from a neighborhood of predominantly Black and Hispanic families, per CNN reporting. Data centers concentrate servers, cooling systems and electrical infrastructure in large facilities, and nearby residents have raised concerns about equipment noise, backup generator emissions, light pollution and heavy electricity demand.

Residents including Griffin and Carrie D'Anna have argued that the neighborhood needed a grocery store or gas station more than a data center. City officials counter that the project could generate millions in tax revenue over 10 years, potentially supporting schools, teacher salaries and property-tax reductions. They also say the facility would use a closed-loop cooling system that would not create large water demands on the city.

Standing, Appeals, and the Attorney General


A standing dispute has moved the case to a Texas appeals court, while the attorney general opened a parallel investigation.

A Williamson County state district judge dismissed Griffin's lawsuit in October 2025, ruling that she and her relatives lacked legal standing because they neither owned the disputed land nor held a direct financial interest in it. Griffin's attorney, Chris Osborn, has maintained that the dismissal resolved only the standing question, leaving the enforceability of the original parkland restriction untouched. The case is now before a Texas appeals court.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a separate investigation into whether the 1999 trust and park-use restriction were lawfully modified or terminated during the property's chain of transfers. "I will not allow any person or entity to disregard the rule of law or obligations owed to the public," Paxton said in the announcement. The AG's office has indicated it may seek court intervention if the land is found subject to a charitable trust or enforceable restriction, while the City of Taylor said it would cooperate but declined further comment due to ongoing litigation.

Taylor's dispute is unfolding alongside broader growth pressures. Samsung already operates a semiconductor fabrication plant on the city's north side, and a separate 665-acre proposal called Project Mustang sits outside city limits, where much of the city's regulatory authority does not reach. City officials say they are considering new rules covering noise, setbacks, emissions and water use for data centers in industrially zoned areas. The outcome of both the appeal and the AG investigation could determine whether the parkland language survives, and what written public commitments are legally worth in Texas.

Botched Redactions Expose Google’s Nebraska Data Center Water Use and Electricity Demand

Annemarije de Boer
Mon, October 5, 2026 


Image: KOLN


Key takeaways

Google-affiliated entities in Nebraska had confidential trade secrets revealed in state filings, disclosing data on water consumption, peak electricity demand, and expected tax benefits for facilities in Lincoln, Omaha, and Papillion.

KOLN reported that selecting blacked-out text in state filings submitted to the Nebraska Department of Water, Energy, and Environment recovered figures that Google-affiliated entities had claimed as confidential trade secrets. The disclosure surfaced data on water consumption, peak electricity demand, and expected tax benefits for facilities in Lincoln, Omaha, and Papillion.

The Lincoln facility operates under the affiliated name Agate LLC. State filings had kept the basic resource costs out of public view until this disclosure, according to KOLN's reporting.

What the Numbers Actually Show

Agate LLC's Lincoln facility reported 52.65 megawatts of peak electrical demand, a measure of maximum draw at a given moment rather than total annual consumption.

Annual water use at the Lincoln site came to 13.299 megagallons, or 13.299 million gallons, attributed to cooling towers, evaporative systems, and site operations. KOLN noted that figure fills roughly 20 Olympic-size swimming pools and represents less than half of Lincoln's reported single-day city water usage on Sept. 29; those comparisons use different time and accounting bases, so they should be read as illustrative rather than direct equivalents.

The broader state picture is considerably larger. Six Nebraska data centers had submitted reports by Sept. 30, with combined annual water consumption of approximately 765 million gallons; that total reflects only the facilities that had reported by that date and may not represent every Nebraska data center.

Google's Papillion facility, identified in filings as Fireball Group LLC, reported 547.88 megagallons for 2025 alone. That figure accounts for roughly 72 percent of the six-facility total, according to KOLN's account of the recovered documents.
The Tax Figures Behind the Redaction

The same redaction failure reportedly surfaced expected 2025 tax benefits tied to all three Google-affiliated Nebraska facilities.

Figures recovered from the DWEE documents, as reported by KOLN, show Agate LLC in Lincoln expecting $55,822,472; Fireball Group LLC in Papillion expecting $39,171,573.39; and Westwood Solutions LLC in Omaha expecting $22,558,881. The filings attributed these amounts to sales-and-use-tax exemptions under the Nebraska Advantage Act.

The filings also stated that no rebates under that program had been received to date. No incentive payments under the ImagiNE Nebraska Act had been received or were expected, according to the same documents.

Why It Was Redacted, and How It Wasn't

Google-affiliated entities cited Neb. Rev. Stat. sections 81-1527 and 84-712.05, along with NAC Title 115, Chapter 2, to claim electricity and water figures as trade secrets, though the available materials do not establish that each claim was formally adjudicated.

The redaction failed at the technical level: the underlying text remained selectable in the PDF documents. Whether DWEE formally evaluated and approved each confidentiality claim, or whether the agency has since corrected the documents, remains unclear.

KOLN filed a public-records request with DWEE on Sept. 30 seeking the redacted information. KOLN's report did not identify a formal Google response addressing the figures, the trade-secret claims, or the redaction failure.
State Oversight and What You Can Access

Gov. Jim Pillen signed an executive order creating a Data Center Task Force under DWEE to examine water resources, electricity systems, and local infrastructure impacts.

The order, signed in July 2026, also directed state agencies to coordinate review of data-center proposals and their resource impacts. Nebraska residents can view submitted reports through DWEE's Public Assistance Viewer by entering "DCR" in the "DEQ Program" field.

The episode may prompt DWEE to improve redaction procedures and clarify which data legitimately qualify as protectable trade secrets. Whether those standards will change remains an unresolved public-records and policy question.

Google Is Accused of Destroying Nearly 500 Football Fields of Forest for New Data Center Project


Al Landes
Sun, October 4, 2026


Image: Shutterstock / Futurism

Key takeaways

Approximately 300 hectares of Finnish forest were cleared for Google’s data-center expansion before the environmental-impact assessment procedures for the project had concluded.


Approximately 300 hectares of Finnish forest, reportedly comparable to 500 football fields, were cleared for Google's data-center expansion before environmental-impact assessment procedures for the project had concluded. The clearing happened first; the environmental review was still running.

Finland's supervisory agency LVV is examining whether Tuike Finland Oy, Google's Finnish project company, failed to complete a legally required environmental-impact assessment before beginning permanent land-use conversion reportedly exceeding 200 hectares. No legal finding has been reached; this is a regulatory inquiry, not a verdict.

The clearing sits inside a much larger commitment. Google announced at least €13 billion in Finnish AI infrastructure investment through 2028, according to Reuters, spanning data centers across Hamina, Kajaani, Muhos, and Vaala. The company described it as its largest single investment in Europe.

Both sides have staked out clear positions. Google told AFP that "tree felling activities have been taking place in compliance with Forestry Act requirements," adding that ecological surveys were conducted before work began and that areas of high environmental value were protected during forestry operations.

Hanna Halmeenpää, chair of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, disputes that framing. Satellite imagery, she says, shows four areas identified as nature sites in the local plan were bulldozed, potentially disrupting wildlife corridors and local bird species.

Halmeenpää told AFP: "In our view, operations at this construction site should be suspended until it is clarified whether the project is in compliance with the law." The association asked LVV to halt activity at the site. No suspension has been reported in available coverage.

The core dispute is a sequencing problem that reaches beyond this single site. AI infrastructure runs on physical land, concrete, electricity, and timber, and when hyperscale projects move faster than environmental review processes, the ecological costs arrive before anyone has formally approved them.

LVV must now determine whether compliance with Finland's Forestry Act is sufficient when a separate, broader environmental assessment was still incomplete at the time of clearing. That distinction, between forestry permits and legally required environmental-impact assessment requirements, is the legal fault line the investigation must resolve, and its outcome could set a precedent for how European regulators treat large-scale data-center development going forward.



Google AI data center project investigated after 420 football fields of Finnish forest demolished

Mark Tyson
Mon, October 5, 2026 
TOM'S HARDWARE

Key takeaways

Google is under investigation for allegedly clearing over 300 hectares of forest in Finland without obtaining an environmental impact assessment beforehand



Credit: Google

Google's latest data center construction project in Finland is being investigated after the company representing the search giant allegedly cleared over 300 hectares of forest. The reported issue is that Google's local operator, Tuike Finland, cleared the 420 football fields' worth of trees without obtaining a mandatory environmental impact assessment beforehand, says AFP.


(Image credit: Microsoft)

The data center cooling state of play

The custom AI ASIC state of play

America's AI chip rules keep changing — and the rest of the world is paying the price

Demand for data center CPUs has surged, and AI agents are responsible


Google sees Finland as an attractive European data center host country due to a number of favorable factors. The source notes that it is a country with a cool climate, plus stable and cheap energy supplies (mostly nuclear, wind and hydro). Moreover, Finland sees data centers as a solution to address some current woes such as slow economic growth and record-high unemployment levels.


Google

This new development near Muhos, a small town with fewer than 9,000 residents, isn't the first for Google in Finland. It already has a facility up and running in Hamina, in the south, but hopes to expand in Muhos, Kajaani, and Vaala, in the north. Overall, it is a massive expansion project, and part of a 13-billion-euro ($15-billion) investment in Finland over the next two years. Finland's potential data center appeal has also made it a location of choice for Microsoft and TikTok.

While the local mayor looks forward to the massive investment, growth of business, and general economic boom for the region, residents are waking up to the experience of others where data centers have sprung up. Concerns about impacts on the environment, energy supply stability, and energy prices are simmering under the surface.

Google seems to have trampled on some of these concerns already, with these reports of trees already felled and excavators clearing the ground before government agency approval. Not a good start.

"In our view, operations at this construction site should be suspended until it is clarified whether the project is in compliance with the law," Hanna Halmeenpaa, chair of the board of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, told AFP at the edge of the freshly deforested area near Muhos. Even some nature preservation areas have been logged, reckons the chair. Halmeenpaa was responsible for filing the suspension request with the conservation agency.

Google denies prematurely devastating the forest. It told AFP that tree felling had been "in compliance with Forestry Act requirements." Moreover, its Finland comms manager said, in a contrasting statement to that of Halmeenpaa, that Google has been ensuring "high-value nature zones within the sites have been protected during forestry works."

We haven't seen any other reports indicating that preparation and construction work has ceased at the new data center development site near Muhos. So it seems like Google will plow ahead, hoping or knowing that the political and/or business will is sufficiently strong to ensure it won't have to undo any of the actions it has already completed.



Finnish town braces for change from Google data centres

Anna KORKMAN
Sat, October 3, 2026 


The planned data centres are part of an announced 13-billion-euro ($15-billion) investment in Finland (Alessandro RAMPAZZO)
In the northern Finnish town of Muhos, 36-year-old farmer Joni Pitkanen is preparing for life with a new neighbour -- just kilometers away, tech giant Google is planning to build new data centres.

The planned data centres are part of an announced 13-billion-euro ($15-billion) investment in Finland over the next two years -- the US tech giant's single biggest investment in Europe.

A few kilometers down the gravel road that passes by Pitkanen's farm, the forest has already been cut down on land acquired by Google, with excavators now clearing the ground and rumbling trucks shuttling back and forth to the construction area located next to major power lines.

"The project is so massive that it's basically hard to really grasp, even though we're right here on the sidelines," Pitkanen said, as a few cows dozed in a meadow in front of the barn.

Google's expansion plans include the Finnish municipalities of Kajaani, Muhos and Vaala as well as Hamina, where it already operates a data centre.

The massive investment prompted US President Donald Trump to urge Google to rethink its plans in a message on his Truth Social network.

Pitkanen said he was so far "fairly positive" about the project, as it will bring "large-scale business activity" and "life" to the rural municipality with a population of only around 8,800 people.

"But of course we are concerned about... how we can prepare for the energy consumption," he added.

In his office in the small village centre, Muhos mayor Kimmo Hinno told AFP that Google's "massive investment" kept him busy these days as "no industry of this type" existed here at present.

"This will completely change the situation for the entire municipality and the Oulu region," he said, adding that he expected "thousands of workers" of different nationalities during the construction period -- who will need both housing and other services.

Outside a grocery store, 60-year-old nurse Aila Heilima said she hoped the investment would "motivate young people to stay" in Muhos for work, instead of moving to bigger towns in search of job opportunities.

– Mounting criticism –



But Google's plans have already sparked controversy.

The Finnish Supervisory Agency (LVV) is currently investigating whether company Tuike Finland, which represents Google, had cleared more than 300 hectares of forest in Muhos without a mandatory environmental impact assessment.

"In our view, operations at this construction site should be suspended until it is clarified whether the project is in compliance with the law," Hanna Halmeenpaa, chair of the board of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, who filed the request with the agency, told AFP at the edge of the deforested area.

"From the satellite images, we've seen that nature sites which should be preserved have also been logged," she added, explaining that the size of the clear-cut area was comparable to 420 football fields.

Google, meanwhile, told AFP in an email that "tree felling activities have been taking place in compliance with Forestry Act requirements" and they "were awaiting further guidance from LVV on this matter."

"We have conducted extensive nature surveys covering the entire area as part of the zoning and Environmental Impact Assessment processes, to ensure high-value nature zones within the sites have been protected during forestry works," said Sondre Ronander, communications manager for Google in Finland.

- Call for regulation -

Finland has seen a spike in data centre investments, with its cool climate and relatively stable and cheap electricity that is mostly produced without fossil fuels thanks to nuclear plants as well as extensive wind and hydro power.

Prime Minister Petteri Orpo's right-wing government has prioritised attracting data centre investments to the Nordic country, which is grappling with record-high unemployment and sluggish economic growth.

But, as dozens of the energy guzzling centres are now under construction and many more planned by companies including Microsoft and TikTok, uncertainty around energy prices, grid capacity and environmental effects have sparked a public debate in Finland.

A citizen's initiative demanding stricter regulation regarding data centre energy use and consequences for the environment gathered more than 50,000 signatures in just three days after it opened, meaning it will have to be reviewed by parliament.

ank/jll/po/rl/cms


Finland strips big data centers of automatic grid priority in a policy overhaul

Efosa Udinmwen
Mon, October 5, 2026 



Key takeaways

Finland plans to change its electricity connection system to prioritize smaller projects over large data centers, with facilities of 1MW or less getting priority.


Credit: Getty Images

Finland plans four connection categories, with facilities of 1MW or less getting priority


Large data centers could move further back in Finland's electricity connection queue


Projects above 10MW would enter a separate category under Finland's proposed system


Finland's government has drafted an amendment that would end arrival-order grid connections with rules that give smaller projects earlier access.

The change would place large computing facilities into lower priority categories unless they satisfy additional electricity production and flexibility requirements.

The government says the changes are intended to encourage major power users to reduce pressure on electricity prices and constrained network capacity.
New categories would change connection priorities

Under the proposal, connection applications would be divided into four categories, with each group receiving different priority under the revised system.

The first category would cover connections requiring no more than 3MW, allowing eligible projects to retain year-round processing.

Critical infrastructure would also qualify, alongside storage facilities up to 100kVA and certain storage systems connected directly to power plants.

Data centers would generally be excluded from this category, unless their required connection capacity is 1MW or less.

The second category would include data centers requiring more than 1MW but no more than 10MW of connection capacity

However, those facilities could qualify for different treatment if they provide flexibility agreements covering generation capacity equal to at least 80% of peak demand.

The third category would include data centers above 10MW, which would not face the production commitment attached to projects in the second category.

The fourth category would contain other connection applications that do not qualify for any of the three higher priority groups.

The government expects the proposed arrangement to encourage energy-intensive operators to consider locations where electricity networks face less congestion.

It would also require certain facilities to contribute directly toward local electricity supply before receiving connection priority under the new framework.
Large facilities face additional electricity requirements

For qualifying projects, 50% of their expected yearly electricity use would need coverage from generation located within the surrounding area.

That generating facility would have to begin operating within 36 months before the associated data center becomes operational under the proposed conditions.

The electricity source would also need to remain within the same locality, preventing projects from relying entirely upon generation situated elsewhere.

Data centers would additionally need to make flexible generation or demand reduction available through an organized electricity trading platform.

The flexibility arrangement would require uninterrupted generation capability, with available output reaching at least 10% of the facility's maximum demand.

Projects meeting the first three categories would then enter a common six-month allocation process rather than receiving connections solely according to application dates.

The first allocation under that process is scheduled for December 2027, giving applicants a defined timeframe for consideration.

The amendment is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, and could also affect earlier requests without completed connection agreements.

That provision would allow the proposed rules to influence applications already submitted if negotiations have not produced binding arrangements.

Via DataCenterDynamic

Sunday, October 04, 2026

 

Power Demand Is Surging Faster Than Grids Can Keep Up

  • Global electricity demand is surging at its fastest pace in 15 years, driven by AI, data centers, electrification and industrialization.

  • The U.S., Europe and Asia are taking different paths to meet rising demand, with APAC expected to account for nearly three-quarters of global demand growth through 2035.

  • Power grids are emerging as the biggest bottleneck, with the IEA estimating annual grid investment must rise 50% from today’s roughly $400 billion by 2030.

After years of stagnation in key developed markets, power demand is rising again at a pace not seen in decades as data centers, electrification, and industrialization drive a surge in electricity consumption.

The Age of Electricity, as the International Energy Agency (IEA) put it in its 2026 Electricity report, is gathering pace, changing long-term assumptions and forecasts about power markets in all regions, and posing new challenges for policymakers, power generators, and grid operators.

One common feature in the Age of Electricity is that power demand is rising everywhere in the world, driven by higher electrification rates and the AI and data center boom. But different countries and regions have taken different pathways to meet higher electricity demand, reshaping their regional power markets in different ways, analysts at Wood Mackenzie say.

Booming Power Demand

In the United States, electricity consumption set a new record high last year and is on track for new all-time highs this year and next, as the AI boom has ended America’s decade of stagnant power use.

This growth was mostly due to the data centers, as “data center load is emerging as the dominant driver of long-term U.S. electricity growth,” as the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in its annual outlook earlier this year.

Despite a pause in connecting new data center projects in Texas to the grid, the West South Central region will still account for the largest regional share of growth in total electricity sales, totaling nearly 20% of nationwide growth in 2026 and almost 40% in 2027, according to the EIA’s forecast in the Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) for September.

WoodMac’s analysts forecast 3.2% annual electricity sales growth in the U.S. through 2035, two-thirds of which will come from data centers. With the backing of the Trump Administration, gas remains a popular choice and will meet 52% of the increased power generation through 2035.

However, gas investment costs have hit a record high, and bottlenecks in gas turbine deliveries are complicating decisions to rely too much on gas-powered generation.

“The need for electrons must be balanced against the risk of stranded assets,” Wood Mackenzie’s power and renewables market analysts say.

“The tension between speed to power and affordability are spurring reforms across regional US power markets,” they added, but noted that state policy responses remain fragmented and there is no silver bullet to solving the challenge.

Power demand in Europe is also rising, due to the same global factors plus another major driver—the European Union’s decarbonization policies and drive to boost the share of renewables as a way to protect against geopolitical challenges to energy security, such as the lack of LNG supply from Qatar because of the Iran war and the disrupted traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

The Asia-Pacific region is set to see the biggest power demand growth of any region, driven by industrialization, economic expansion, and urbanization in China, India, and Southeast Asia, according to Wood Mackenzie.

The APAC region will account for nearly three-quarters of overall global demand growth to 2035, WoodMac says.

Grids Aren’t Ready for the Power Demand Surge

Despite the fact that the pathways to meeting rising power demand diverge among regions, another common thread has emerged in recent years. It’s that the grids are not ready to handle the surge in electricity loads.

Global power demand is expected to grow by more than 3.5% per year on average through the end of the decade, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said in its Electricity 2026 report.

Global electricity demand is rising at the fastest pace in 15 years and will continue to do so at least until the end of the decade as AI infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification have ushered in The Age of Electricity, the IEA says.

As demand grows, developers of new capacity, especially renewables and natural gas, face constraints in connecting to the grids. Regional and country-specific trends are not the same, but the need for rapid and efficient expansion of grids is a pressing global issue. Without increased system flexibility and rapid grid expansion, the Age of Electricity could roll out at a slower pace than expected.

Today, global investments in grids are about $400 billion per year. If the world is to meet the expected growth in power demand through 2030, it would need to boost annual grid investment by about 50% from $400 billion, according to the IEA.

“A lack of grid capacity is emerging as a critical bottleneck in many regions, driving higher levels of congestion and slowing the deployment of new electricity generation, storage and demand,” the agency said in the report.

“Grid connection queues have reached record levels worldwide.”

In other words, today’s grids are not ready to handle tomorrow’s electricity needs.

“Meeting this demand will require annual investment in grids to rise by 50% by 2030,” Keisuke Sadamori, IEA Director of Energy Markets and Security, said earlier this year.

“Expanding flexibility will also be crucial as power networks continue to evolve – so will a strong focus on security and resilience.”

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com