Showing posts sorted by date for query PARTHENON. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query PARTHENON. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, March 01, 2026

From Greenland to Gaza, the White Man's Burden makes a comeback

From Gaza to Greenland, Iran to Venezuela, imperial projects are rebranded as “security” at the expense of Indigenous freedoms, writes Randa Ghazy.


Voices
Randa Ghazy
26 Feb, 2026


Decisions about land, sovereignty, and resources are debated in distant capitals, while those most affected are treated as secondary actors in their own history. Their voices, once again missing from Western media, writes Randa Ghazy

British imperialist businessman Cecil Rhodes once claimed that “[The English people] are the first race in the world, and the more of the world we inhabit, the better it is for the human race.” This statement, I feel, perfectly embodies the so-called “civilising mission” behind every British colonial endeavour in history.

It was such scientific racism that legitimised imperial expansion: under this logic, having one’s homeland annexed by the British empire was not dispossession, it was an advancement for humanity itself.

For a time, many of us believed this ideology — with its ethical cover for exploitation and brutality — had been consigned to the past. Not anymore.

In the past few years, the genocide in Gaza and the de-facto annexation of the West Bank have reminded us that imperial expansion has not disappeared; it has merely been rebranded. Much of the Western political establishment continues to frame such projects as matters of “security,” “stability,” or “shared values.” And in 2026, leaders like Donald Trump and his allies have revived colonial tropes with striking openness.

Profit-making, wrapped in the language of a “civilising mission,” that echoes Rudyard Kipling’s 'White Man’s Burden', underpins how foreign intervention is sold to the public — whether in Iran, Greenland, or Venezuela. Meanwhile, legacy media often provides reassuring framing: strategic necessity, geopolitical chess, and national interests. Whilst leaving out the human side of the story.

Greenland is a revealing example. The dominant concern among Western liberals was Danish sovereignty, not Greenlandic self-determination. European leaders expressed solidarity “with the Kingdom of Denmark and the people of Greenland,” subtly conflating a colonial administrative structure with the will of an Indigenous population.

As critics have noted, supporting Denmark in the name of international law risks reinforcing an imperial conception of international law — one that arbitrates between empires rather than empowering colonised peoples.

Much of the coverage focused either on Denmark’s legal claim or on Trump’s bombastic style. Trump “wants” Greenland, he “needs it” for security. As Republican Senator Eric Schmitt told the BBC: “Europe should understand that a strong America is good — it’s good for Western civilisation.”

But what does “Western civilisation” mean in this context? Civilisation for whom? And at whose expense?

The Greenlandic Inuit — the Indigenous people of the territory — were largely absent from the conversation. Palestinians are conspicuously missing from the so-called reconstruction discussions around Gaza that are taking place at the ‘Board of Peace’, all whilst aid remains severely limited, and Israel is continuing to encroach on the Strip as the yellow line going further west.

Decisions about land, sovereignty, and resources are debated in distant capitals, while those most affected are treated as secondary actors in their own history. Their voices, once again missing from Western media.

This rhetoric was echoed when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed the Munich Security Conference on 14 February. He urged European allies not to be “shackled by guilt and shame” over their “culture and heritage” and to help the US “revive the West’s age of dominance”. He received a standing ovation.

Soon after, the State Department’s official X account proclaimed that Western civilisation stretches “from Athens to Rome to America” and must embrace its “noble legacy” to reverse its decline.

Yet, few seriously believe that the motivation behind acquiring or threatening to invade Greenland is the defence of Plato or the Parthenon. It is about resources — oil, methane, uranium, nickel, titanium, tungsten, zinc, gold and diamonds — Greenland’s vast and largely untapped mineral wealth.

And this is how colonialism has always functioned, through threats and political pressure, economic domination, and extraction of land as well as labour for the benefit of the coloniser. It is not an archaic system, it is a recurring pattern.

Iran offers another telling case. Western outlets provide extensive coverage to opposition figures such as Reza Pahlavi, son of the deposed shah, while often devoting far less space to the diversity of political voices within Iran itself. The country’s complexity — its ethnic plurality, its ideological divisions, its deeply fragmented diaspora — is flattened into a binary: regime versus liberation through Western pressure.

History should have served as a warning. In 1953, US and British intelligence services intervened in Iran, restoring Mohammad Reza Pahlavi to power after the nationalisation of oil. At the time, US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles justified intervention partly on the grounds that the “free world” could not be deprived of Iranian oil. Strategic resources, once again, were framed as moral necessity.

Today, calls for regime change are often presented as humanitarian concern. Yet the devastating impact of sanctions on ordinary Iranians — and the extent to which economic pressure fuels unrest — receives comparatively little attention. Criticism of Tehran’s brutal repression is necessary and justified. But that should not become a gateway to manufacturing consent for foreign military intervention.

The same double standards are evident elsewhere. Venezuela is framed primarily through the lens of oil and geopolitical shifts. Cuba is discussed through sanctions and containment. Gaza is analysed as a security dilemma. Rarely are the people at the centre of these crises given sustained, primary attention.

The “rules-based international order” is in retreat, while occupation, annexation, or collective punishment are becoming the norm, whether it’s Russia invading Ukraine, Israel annexing Palestinian territory, the US treating Latin America as its ‘backyard’.

Western media cannot single-handedly reverse this trajectory. But it does have a responsibility to decentre imperial narratives, to foreground Indigenous and local voices, to resist the false framework of “civilisation versus chaos.” Journalism should challenge power — not echo it.

Because at its core, this debate is not about civilisation. It is about who gets to define it.

If “Western civilisation” is truly grounded in democracy, human rights and self-determination, then those principles must apply universally — not selectively. They must apply to Greenlanders deciding their own future, to Palestinians seeking freedom and safety, to Iranians navigating their political destiny, to Venezuelans controlling their own oil, and to Cubans living free from the weight of sanctions.

Otherwise, we are not witnessing the defence of civilisation. We are watching the rehabilitation of empire — repackaged in modern language, amplified by media megaphones, and justified once again as a gift to humanity.

The question is not whether history is repeating itself. It is whether we are willing to recognise it — and refuse to participate in its next chapter.



Randa Ghazy is an Italian Egyptian journalist and writer based in London. She has published several books with Italian publisher Rizzoli, including "Dreaming of Palestine" at the age of 15, which has been translated into 16 languages. She has worked as a TV producer at Pan-Arab network Al Araby TV, and led the Gaza media response at Save the Children International, where she held the role of Middle East, North Africa and Eastern Europe Media Manager.

Follow Randa on X: @ghazy_r on Instagram: @randa_ghazy

Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@alaraby.co.uk.

Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The New Arab, its editorial board or staff.


Friday, December 12, 2025

Interest rate cut can't undo 'damage created by Trump's chaos economy': economist


President Donald Trump in the White House Rose Garden on April 2, 2025 (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok/Flickr)

December 11, 2025

A leading economist and key congressional Democrat on Wednesday pointed to the Federal Reserve’s benchmark interest rate cut as just the latest evidence of the havoc that President Donald Trump is wreaking on the economy.

The US central bank has a dual mandate to promote price stability and maximum employment. The Federal Open Market Committee may raise the benchmark rate to reduce inflation, or cut it to spur economic growth, including hiring. However, the FOMC is currently contending with a cooling job market and soaring costs

After the FOMC’s two-day monthly meeting, the divided committee announced a quarter-point reduction to 3.5-3.75%. It’s the third time the panel has cut the federal funds rate in recent months after a pause during the early part of Trump’s second term.

“Today’s decision shows that the Trump economy is in a sorry state and that the Federal Reserve is concerned about a weakening job market,” House Budget Committee Ranking Member Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said in a statement. “On top of a flailing job market, the president’s tariffs—his national sales tax—continue to fuel inflation.”

“To make matters worse, extreme Republican policies, including Trump’s Big Ugly Law, are driving healthcare costs sharply higher,” he continued, pointing to the budget package that the president signed in July. “I will keep fighting to lower costs and for an economy that works for every American.”

Alex Jacquez, a former Obama administration official who is now chief of policy and advocacy at the Groundwork Collaborative, similarly said that “Trump’s reckless handling of the economy has backed the Fed into a corner—stuck between rising costs and a weakening job market, it has no choice but to try and offer what little relief they can to consumers via rate cuts.”

“But the Fed cannot undo the damage created by Trump’s chaos economy,” Jacquez added, “and working families are heading into the holidays feeling stretched, stressed, and far from jolly.”

Thanks to the historically long federal government shutdown, the FOMC didn’t have typical data—the consumer price index or jobs report—to inform Wednesday’s decision. Instead, its new statement and projections “relied on ‘available indicators,’ which Fed officials have said include their own internal surveys, community contacts, and private data,” Reuters reported.

“The most recent official data on unemployment and inflation is for September, and showed the unemployment rate rising to 4.4% from 4.3%, while the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation also increased slightly to 2.8% from 2.7%,” the news agency noted. “The Fed has a 2% inflation target, but the pace of price increases has risen steadily from 2.3% in April, a fact at least partly attributable to the pass-through of rising import taxes to consumers and a driving force behind the central bank’s policy divide.”

The lack of government data has also shifted journalists’ attention to other sources, including the revelation from global payroll processing firm ADP that the US lost 32,000 jobs in November, as well as Gallup’s finding last week that Americans’ confidence in the economy has fallen by seven points over the past month and is now at its lowest level in over a year.

The Associated Press highlighted that the rate cut is “good news” for US job-seekers:

“Overall, we’ve seen a slowing demand for workers with employers not hiring the way they did a couple of years ago,” said Cory Stahle, senior economist at the Indeed Hiring Lab. “By lowering the interest rate, you make it a little more financially reasonable for employers to hire additional people. Especially in some areas—like startups, where companies lean pretty heavily on borrowed money—that’s the hope here.”Stahle acknowledged that it could take time for the rate cuts to filter down to employers and then to workers, but he said the signal of the reduction is also important.
“Beyond the size of the cut, it tells employers and job-seekers something about the Federal Reserve’s priorities and focus. That they’re concerned about the labor market and willing to step in and support the labor market. It’s an assurance of the reserve’s priorities.”

The Federal Reserve is now projecting only one rate cut next year. During a Wednesday press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell pointed to the three cuts since September and said that “we are well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves.”

However, Powell is on his way out, with his term ending in May, and Trump signaled in a Tuesday interview with Politico that agreeing with immediate interest rate cuts is a litmus test for his next nominee to fill the role.

Trump—who embarked on a nationwide “affordability tour” this week after claiming last week that “the word ‘affordability’ is a Democrat scam”—also graded the US economy on his watch, giving it an A+++++.

US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) responded: “Really? 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. 800,000 are homeless. Food prices are at record highs. Wages lag behind inflation. God help us when we have a B+++++ economy.”

Fact-checker says White House 'misleading the public' on inflation


White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt holds a press briefing at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., December 11, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

December 11, 2025  
ALTERNET

President Donald Trump's administration is cherry-picking inflation data to paint a more flattering picture of the economic climate, according to new reporting from CNN.

During the Thursday episode of her show "The Source," CNN host Kaitlan Collins took Trump's White House to task for falsely reporting the rate of inflation more than 10 months into Trump's second term. She began the segment by playing an exchange she had with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, in which Leavitt insisted that the inflation rate was down to 2.5 percent from the three percent Trump inherited from former President Joe Biden.

"So we're trending in the right direction with more to come. And I would remind you, when President Trump left office in his first term, inflation was 1.7 percent, and the previous administration jacked it up to a record high nine percent," Leavitt said. "So again, in ten months, the president has clawed us out of this hole. He's kept it low at 2.5 percent. And we believe that number is going to continue to decline, especially as energy and oil prices continue to decline as well."

CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale disputed Leavitt's claims that Trump had lowered inflation, pointing to the September consumer price index (CPI) report — which is the most recent month of data available — showing that inflation remained at three percent. Dale said Leavitt's use of the 2.5 percent figure was "very much apples to oranges," saying that she was purposefully using the average rate from all 10 months of Trump's second term — rather than the most recent figures — as a means of downplaying the impact of Trump's tariffs.

"So when the press secretary told us today that we're very much headed in the right direction, we're not," Dale said. "... They're grabbing this early-year data. Why are they doing that? Well, because inflation was lower before President Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day,' when he announced sweeping global tariffs that then made their way through the economy."

"So by using this ... annualized rate, they're making inflation sound rosier than it would if they use the one month, most recent data that everyone else is talking about," he continued. "So, no, this is not an apples-to-apples comparison."

"They're entitled to use whatever kind of math they want," he added. "The annualized rate is a real thing, but they're not clearly explaining that they're doing so. And I think that's where they're misleading the public."

Watch the segment below:




Economist rips 'lying' Trump for 'driving the affordability crisis'


White House photo
December 10, 2025 
ALTERNET

During a Tuesday, December 9 rally in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, President Donald Trump aggressively defended his economic record. Trump insisted that inflation is way down under his watch and claimed that he is making the United States "affordable again."

But the following day on MS NOW, Trump's economic record got a scathing critique from University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers.

The Australian economist, who is originally from Sydney but now lives in the U.S., laid out a variety of ways in which Trump is hurting the economy during a Wednesday morning, December 10 appearance on Ana Cabrera's show.

Wolfers told Cabera, "Look, what I want, Ana, is for us to have honest conversations about the economy. Prices are rising; people feel that. Those are two realities. Another reality is that prices tend to rise in modern economies. It's called inflation. What we typically try to do is not get prices to fall, but get them to rise sufficiently slowly that you barely notice it. When the president says prices are falling, he's lying. When he says he's going to get prices down, he really shouldn't. Because the only way to get prices down is to crush the economy."

The United States, Wolfers added, needs to have "a mature and responsible conversation" about the economy — and Trump isn't offering that.


"Prices are rising," Wolfers told Cabrera, "and what we want from policy is for them to rise slowly — and for people to have an opportunity to get wage rises so that their overall quality of life can do more than keep up, actually get ahead…. I think there's a lot of pain out there right now. Often, we'd say that there's not much that a president can do to shape the economy, except this is a president who's given no deference at all to Congress. And so, the president has done a lot of things."

Wolfers continued, "Let's be clear. He's imposed tariffs…. We have mass deportations; that's making it very difficult for some parts of the economy, particularly agriculture and construction, to get the workers they want. We had the Big, Beautiful Bill, which is the largest redistribution of money from poor to rich in a single bill in American history. We've got the Obamacare subsidies expiring, which could lead to a big shock to the health insurance costs facing a lot of Americans. And we've had overall attempts to undermine Obamacare as well — as well as the loss of renewable energy subsidies and attacks on SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). So, if you want to see what's driving the affordability crisis, you don't need to look any further than the White House."



Fresh data show US consumers still strained by inflation

By AFP
December 5, 2025


The impact of lingering inflation remains a question mark surrounding the US holiday shopping season - Copyright AFP/File Joseph Prezioso

US consumer pricing and sentiment reports released Friday pointed to lingering questions about affordability as the calendar moves towards the peak of the festive season.

The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred data point for measuring inflation, rose to 2.8 percent on an annual basis in September from 2.7 percent in August.

When food and energy prices were excluded, prices also rose by 2.8 percent in September. However, that was below the 2.9 percent reading in August for the same benchmark.

The mixed report, delayed due to the US federal government shutdown, is the last major inflation reading before the Fed’s rate decision next week.

The figures were largely in line with expectations, but included notable increases in some categories that have strained consumers. Durable goods like automobiles, appliances and furniture rose 1.4 percent from a year ago.

A separate report showed consumer sentiment rose in December to 53.3 from 51.0 in November, according to the University of Michigan.

However, consumers today have a diminished outlook for their expected personal income compared with early in 2025 and labor market expectations “remained relatively dismal,” said survey director Joanne Hsu.

“Consumers see modest improvements from November on a few dimensions, but the overall tenor of views is broadly somber, as consumers continue to cite the burden of high prices,” she said.

The data did not significantly move the US stock market on Friday. Stocks are up modestly for the week, due partly to expectations the Fed will cut interest rates next week.

The Fed has cut interest rates at its last two meetings following indications of a slowdown in the US employment market.

But the Fed has also kept an eye on inflation due to the risk that President Donald Trump’s tariffs could reignite a major increase in prices.

EY-Parthenon Chief Economist Gregory Daco predicted the US central bank would cut rates as expected next week, but could face multiple dissents.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell will “persuade several hesitant policymakers to support a third consecutive ‘risk management’ rate cut, while signaling firmly that additional easing is unlikely before next spring absent a material weakening in economic conditions,” Daco said in a note.

Friday’s pricing data revealed a “gradual and uneven” tariff pass-through on goods, “exacerbating the affordability crisis,” Daco said.

“While many businesses have absorbed cost pressures using pre-tariff inventories and narrower margins, these buffers are slowly eroding,” said Daco, who expects rising inflation in late 2025 and early 2026, “further complicating the consumer outlook amid softening labor-market dynamics.”

Thursday, August 07, 2025

Minoan Gate of Heavens and Earth

 July 29, 2025

PHOTO ESSAY / LONG READ

A painting of two women AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Beautiful Minoan women from a fresco in the palace of Knossos, Crete, c. 1,500 BCE. Wikipedia

The Bronze Age

The Cycladic, the Minoan, and the Mycenaean cultures define the Bronze Age of Greece, 3,100-1,000 BCE. This was a period of flourishing architecture, craftmanship, agriculture, sanitation, including the earliest forms of Greek writing deciphered from Linear B tablets. Greek trade and seafaring in the Aegean increased considerably during the early Bronze Age, sometime between 3,100 and 2,000 BCE. Economic activities, already growing in the Neolithic period, 7,000 to 3,100 BCE, simply accelerated in the Bronze Age. The earliest mining and metallurgy in Greece took roots in the Cycladic islands. However, the island of Lemnos in the northern Aegean, had Poliochni, a town distinguished by its pioneering planning, architecture, and metallurgy. Because of Poliochni, Lemnos became an outstanding center of metalworking and technological innovation in the Bronze Age.

A red vase with two handles AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Depas amphikypellon, Poliochni in the island of Lemnos. Early Bronze Age, 3rd millennium BCE. National Archaeological Museum, Athens. Photo: Schuppi, Wikipedia

Nevertheless, the Cyclades made considerable advances in shipbuilding, propulsion, and sea travel with the assistance of pictorial representations of the constellations. In fact the Cycladic islanders were so much caught up in nautical technology, sea exploration, fishing, and culture of ships that they were the first people in the Aegean to incise natural phenomena, ships, and fish on pottery, carve them on rocks, and create lead models of them. The material culture of Cyclades was original and rich in architecture, pottery, and marble carvings.[1]

Daskalio and Keros

A rocky cliff with people walking on it AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Daskalio, islet next to Keros and south of Naxos in Cyclades. Archaeological findings on Dhaskalio — 46 marble buildings — dating to 4,600 years BCE show advanced Greek civilization in the Cyclades. Photo: Greek Ministry of Culture

Archaeological excavations in Daskalio and Keros confirm the general picture of a flourishing culture in Cyclades. Daskalio and Keros are tiny Cycladic islands connected to each other centuries ago. They are relatively close and south of Naxos.

A satellite view of the earth AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Aegean islands, including Lemnos in northern central Aegean, looking like a walking bear. Southern Aegean is home of the islands of a circle: Kyklades / Cyclades, north of the large island of Crete. The Cycladic island of Thera exploded in 1600’s BCE. Thera looks like a semicircle, a small and tiny piece of a broken island in the southern zone of the Cyclades. The almost round Naxos, the largest Cycladic island, is in the northern part of Cyclades. Tiny dots, Daskalio and Keros, are seen near the southern periphery of Naxos. NASA.

Greek and British archaeologists excavated Daskalio and Keros. As early as 2,750 BCE, Keros had a thriving metallurgy and craftsmanship. It had a maritime sanctuary that attracted Greeks from the neighborhood islands who brought marble, ceramic, and stone figurines as gifts to the gods. The recovery of these artifacts triggered their looting and sale to museums and private collectors. The British and Greek archaeologists and the almost indifferent Greek government failed to safeguard those Greek Bronze Age treasures.

A statue of a person sitting on a chair AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Harp player from Keros, 2,600 BCE. National Archaeological Museum, Athens. Photo: Robur.q Wikipedia Commons

Daskalio, even more than Keros, had a remarkable culture. At around 2,250 BCE, it had megara / anaktora (large buildings), as well as metal works of outstanding quality, including advanced drainage, plumbing and sanitation.[2] This level of civilization was no different than that of Thera, another Cycladic island that probably had close relations with Keros and Daskalio.

Minoan Crete

A painting of a bull and a person on a wall AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Bull-leaping, Knossos Palace, Crete, 1,600 BCE. Herakleion Archaeological Museum. Photo: Deror Avi. Wikipedia Commons

The largest Greek island, Crete, also flourished during the Bronze Age. Crete in fact built such a sophisticated civilization that it probably influenced the development of Mycenaean culture in Peloponnesos and mainland Greece. It is possible to speak of the Minoan Peace in the Aegean and Crete. It lasted for about 1,000 years between 2,000 and 1,000 BCE. The adjective Minoan comes from King Minos, son of Zeus and Europe / Europa. Europa was the daughter of Agenor, son of Poseidon and Libya. Zeus took the form of a bull, so beautiful that Europa climbed on it, and Zeus brought her to Crete.

A close-up of a coin Description automatically generated

God of metallurgy Hephaistos built the winged Talos robot for Zeus who gifted it to his lover, princess Europa — in Crete. Talos protected Europa and Crete by flying over the island 3 times a day. The bull represented Zeus. Courtesy Numismatic Museum, Athens.

Europa gave birth to Minos, Sarpedon, and Rhadamanthys. Europa’s brother, Kadmos, kept searching for her until he reached Thebes in Central Greece. Minos became king of Crete. He married Pasiphae, daughter of the Sun god Helios. Minos, like his brother Rhadamanthys, was a legislator and judge. Herodotos and Plato say that Minos exercised tremendous power at sea.[3] Aristotle says that Minos established a thalassocracy, an empire of the sea in the Aegean and the Mediterranean. Crete was intended by nature to be dominant in Hellas. It is a large island of 3,260 square miles in area, located 99 miles south of Peloponnesos, with a coastline of 650 miles.

An aerial view of a land AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Crete photographed by an American cosmonaut in 2011, NASA.

Crete is well situated in the midst of Hellas and Hellenes.[4] It had no military forts or an army in the fourth-third millennia BCE. Thucydides says that Minos’ navy was the first in the Greek world. With such a pioneering force, Minos became a master of the Aegean, ending piracy in the sea, and governing the Cyclades with his sons.[5] Minoan Crete was also a center of early Greek civilization. The surviving jewelry, ceramic and fresco treasures leave no doubt Minoans loved the beautiful.

A close-up of a painting AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Beautiful Minoan dancer from the palace of Knossos, 1,600-1450 BCE. Photo: Wolfgang Sauber. Wikipedia Commons

The piety of the Minoans for the Greek gods linked them to the Greeks of the Aegean and Ionian islands and those of the mainland. Minoan ceramic vases were delicate, attractive, and very useful. Like Knossos, Phaistos was a thriving Minoan polis.

A stone ruins of a building AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Phaistos. Photo: Jebulon. Wikipedia, Public Domain

One of the most enigmatic and important discoveries in the ruins of the palace of Phaistos was the Phaistos Disk. The cyclical clay disc is dated to 1850 to 1600 BCE. It is a symbol of Greek writing and printing. The Phaistos Disc has a diameter of 5.9 inches. Both sides are covered by a spiral of 45 stamped symbols, some of which are related to the signs of the still undeciphered Linear A script. Luigi Pernier, an Italian archaeologist, discovered the Phaistos Disc in the Phaistos palace of Crete in 1908. Since then the disc has been put under the microscope of scholars. Some of those archaeologists claimed the Phaistos script was not Greek, relating it to Semitic, Egyptian, and Indo-European origins. However, other more wise scholars claim the Phaistos Disc is a Greek treasure of Minoan origins and civilization.

In 1650 BCE, the explosion of Thera did some damage to Crete and its Minoan culture. In 1450 BCE Mycenaean Greeks (from Mycenae in Peloponnesos) were in charge in Knossos, one of the key states in Crete. But even before the coming of the Mycenaeans to Minoan Crete, mainland Greeks were in intimate contact with Minoans. After all, the people of mainland Greece and Crete were Greeks.

In the second millennium BCE, the important states in eastern Crete were Knossos, Phaistos, Mallia, and Zakro. In continental Greece the states that made a difference included Mycenae-Argos and Pylos (in Peloponnesos), Thebes and Orchomenos (in Central Greece) and Iolkos (in Thessaly). The last two, Orchomenos and Iolkos, played a decisive role in the Argonaut expedition to Kolchis, the Greeks’ Far East (the state of Georgia in modern times). All these Bronze Age states had monarchical bureaucracies that supervised specialized labor for domestic and international trade. Furthermore, they did large-scale works like the draining of Lake Kopais in northern Boeotia (Central Greece).

Modern Greece and its Minoan inheritance

Modern Greece has never felt at ease with its ancient culture: the fantastic inheritance of original scientific and technological achievements that made our world, Homer, Aristotle, the Parthenon, the invention of democracy, the Olympics, the Oracle of Apollo at Delphi, Alexander the Great, and even the glorious Minoan beginnings of Greek civilization. This hesitation started in the fourth century when the Eastern Roman emperor Constantine declared war against Hellenic and Roman polytheism. That war is still stifling the genius of ancient Greek civilization in modern Greece.

The reason for this abnormal behavior is that for close to 1,600 years polytheistic Greeks were forced to become monotheistic Christians. That transformation was like a Titanic earthquake that nearly wiped out Hellenic civilization. And another reason for the reluctance of modern Greeks to embrace their ancestors is that they lost their freedom for hundreds of years. The Romans controlled Greece from 146 BCE until the sixth century when emperor Justinian shut down the Academy of Plato in 529 and Greek replaced Latin as the official language of the state. From the sixth century until 1453, the rulers were Christian and mostly of Greek origins. The fourth crusade of 1204 divided Greece among European conquerors, thus preparing the ground for the final conquest of Greece by the Mongol Moslem Turks in 1453.

Western Europeans realized the power of ancient Greek thought. They supported Christianity in Greece in order to prevent the Renaissance in modern Greece. The Turks run Greece, 1453-1821, through Christian clergy.

This chronic alienation from their Hellenic traditions, and, equally, very long foreign influence and control, crashed the Greeks’ ancient polytheistic religion, traditions of democracy, science and freedom. Christian preachers never ceased cursing the ancient Greeks. In 1082, the Orthodox church, with the support of the imperial government in Constantinople, anathematized ancient Hellenic civilization and those who accept or study it.[6]

Thus, modern Greeks have been torn between the ancient glory of their ancestors and the grim reality of their lives. They still see foreigners running their country. Those with education know that their country is a cemetery for hundreds of ancient temples, stadia, theaters, schools and countless other treasures. Some of those treasures fill their museums, which have been bringing millions of tourists to their land.

Members of the Greek ruling class receive their education largely in America and Europe. They govern Greece for the interest and profit of their foreign benefactors. Their government is a copy of European governments. And since Greece is a member of the European Union and NATO, the country takes its orders from EE and NATO. For economic survival alone, the Greek government has museums full of ancient Greek treasures and parrots the rhetoric of American, French and German archaeologists about the value of ancient Hellenic culture.

Professor of astronomy from the University of Athens, Xenophon Moussas, said to me in an email of July 23, 2025, how disappointed he was with the treatment of antiquities by Greek authorities. While foreigners, and to some degree Turks, study and present Greek antiquities in a respectful manner, Greeks have a problem with their archaeological inheritance. “We, in this country, hide, bury, or destroy them,” Moussas said. “Most Greeks cannot stand their heavy Hellenic inheritance. They break the archaeological treasures they discover and, at the same time, try to break us, too. They hide the ancient treasures. Information about many of the archaeological treasures they discover never gets published. It’s necessary that transparency governs archaeological diggings and discoveries. We pay. We should know what happens in archaeological research and excavations.”

I agree with Moussas. He is a defender of the great Minoan circular tower, The Gate of Heaven, about which more below. Now back to the deception of the Greek Ministry of Culture.

On July 12, 2025, the Greek minister of culture, Lina Mendoni, thanked profusely the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, because UNESCO “registered” the Minoan Palaces on the World Heritage List, thus giving them a worldwide recognition. Mendoni then praised the Minoan civilization. She said that the Minoan civilization was “one of the most brilliant civilizations of the prehistoric Aegean.” She added that these palaces, which are all over Crete, “are the authentic expressors of Minoan civilization. The palaces were not only administrative and economic centers. They were centers of culture, art and technological innovation… [and housed] a developed system of writing and administration.”

Lina Mendoni’s hymn of Minoan palaces is largely correct but misleading. Why did she consider the Minoan civilization prehistoric? The palaces, Linear B, and the treasures in the museums from the Minoan era are historical, i.e. they have been dated to the Bronze Age. They were products of history. Besides, two important epics, the Argonautica of Apollonios Rhodios and those of Homer, document life and civilization in the Bronze Age. The Trojan War was not a prehistoric fairy tale. It took place during the Minoan era. The great national poet and teacher of the Greeks, Homer, wrote his Epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, as an anthem to Greek civilization. The Iliad is much more than the story of the Trojan War. It is also against war, but especially civil war. The Odyssey relates much more than the extraordinary efforts of Odysseus to return home to Ithaca. Homer is myth, history, philosophy, patriotism, science and technology. That is the reason why Aristotle loved him, repeatedly citing the Homeric Epics in his philosophical and scientific works. The Philhellene Roman Emperor Hadrian, 117-138, asked the Oracle at Delphi about Homer. Pythia, the priestess of Apollo, said that Homer was from Ithaca. His father was Telemachos, who was the son of King of Ithaca Odysseus. His mother was Polykaste, who was the daughter of King Nestor of the Mycenaean Pylos in southern Peloponnesos (Anthologia Palatina 14.102).

Ancient Greek testimonies and astronomical research of the 21st century tell us that the Trojan War was a historic event at the end of the 13th century / beginnings of the 12th century BCE. For example, in the Odyssey (20.356-357), Homer talks about the eclipse of the Sun over the Ionian Sea. Astronomers studied this eclipse and said the eclipse took place on 30 October 1207 or 16 April 1178 BCE. I describe these facts in my book on Freedom (2025).

Except for the Greeks, we don’t know of any other people who inhabited the prehistoric or historic Aegean. And during the Bronze Age in the Aegean, the Greek Minoan and Mycenaean cultures left their civilization footprints. Crete, the rest of the Aegean islands, Ionia (Asia Minor) and mainland Greece were Greek and cradles of Greek civilization. Like the Cyclades with their admirable and superior culture in the Bronze Age, Minoan Crete had more than palaces. Crete had multi-story houses with running drinking water and cobbled roads and cleanliness, virtues that arrived in Western Europe in late 19th century.

Fall and capture of Minoan civilization?

The Ministry of Greek Culture enriched Lina Mendoni’s narrative about the Minoan Palaces of Crete, saying:

“The Minoan Palatial Centers constitute the most authentic and representative expression of the flourishing Minoan society, offering evidence of early urban development and revealing complex socio-political structures, functionally organized around a hierarchical system. They were administrative, economic and religious centers… [which] were designed to [serve] the diverse needs and functions of a hierarchical society. These monuments constitute a timeless reference point in the history of humanity as they provide material evidence for the development of early economic systems, such as agriculture, animal husbandry and maritime trade.”

Yes, but ancient Greece had no sacred books, religious doctrines / dogmas or priesthood. Therefore, Minoan, Mycenaean, classical and Alexandrian Age Greece was never a hierarchical society. Also, agriculture and animal husbandry were rarely “economic” systems, vague and political words in our time. Agriculture and animal husbandry were literally civilization because they were a synthesis of agricultural labor, self-sufficiency in food production, piety for the gods and a school of freedom and democracy. Xenophon, Athenian general, historian and student of Socrates, said that farming gave the Greeks food security, political freedom, pleasure, cooperation and civilization.[7] Some of the greatest gods protected agriculture: Demetra (wheat and farming), Dionysos (wine and rural culture), Aristaios (honeybees and wildlife), Pan (sheep, goats, cattle) and Poseidon (horses). Of course, local democracy lived next to the Bronze Age kingdoms of Greece. We see this at the beginning of the second book of Homer’s Odyssey (2.1-84) when young Telemachos called on the elderly leading citizens of the Assembly of Ithaca to help him free his house from the tyranny of his mother’s suitors who had occupied his father’s palace. These details of a vibrant democracy in Ithaca in the early 12th century BCE have escaped the rhetoric of the Ministry of Culture because the Ministry often views history through the blurred lenses of ethnonihilism and sometimes to satisfy bureaucratic “economic” needs, as now with the construction of a new airport in Herakleion for millions more foreign visitors to Crete. The Herakleion airport is already encroaching on the sacred Minoan monument of the Hill of Papoura.

For example, the official summary of the Ministry of Culture, and justified hymn to the truly unsurpassed Minoan civilization of Crete, was made on July 12, 2025, the same day that Greek archaeologists, guided by the Ministry of Culture, decided to bury a Minoan treasure that professor of astronomy, Xenophon Moussas, described as the Gate of Heaven. Moussas becomes lyrical. His description of the Gate of Heaven reminds me of the Antikythera Mechanism or the Meteoroskopeion / Observatory that Greek scientists created in the 2nd century BCE in Rhodes. Certainly the Minoan Gate of Heaven of Crete was paradigmatic for the development of science and technology in ancient Greece. Moussas gives us the basic information about the Gate of Heaven. He sent me a paper he is preparing on Papoura Hill where the Gate of Heaven is located. The information I give about this great achievement of Minoan art and culture comes from Moussas’ work.

So Moussas tells us that Papoura Hill is near Knossos. The Hill is “a humble peak that hides at its core one of the oldest Minoan circular structures. The monument—scaled, circular, and well-oriented—reveals that Minoan Crete did not simply build temples, but created stone time mechanisms: observatories, calendars, and sacred cosmic temples. Papoura is not just a building; it is a Gate of Heaven. It combines:

• Architecture: geometrically aligned with celestial phenomena that regulate social life and mark agricultural work and festivals and, of course, celebrations of the New Year.

• Astronomy: functions as an astronomical center, displaying of relevant knowledge, while King Minos of Crete receives the command from Zeus for the next eight-year cycle.

• Mystagogy: unites heaven, Earth, and community into a single ritual body.”

A painting of a temple AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Mystagogy: Sacred ceremony: miniature wall painting (fresco), possibly from the palace of Knossos. Reconstruction in the British Museum: numerous Minoans attending cult in a sacred grove and around a large tripartite shrine / temple, 1580-1530 BCE. Photo: ArchaiOptix, Wikipedia Commons

Moussas continues:

“The circular tower of Papoura is not simply a memorial: it is an observatory of civilization, an astronomical gate, a laboratory for the worship of the mind and the sky. Its protection and widespread beneficial display and use will… strengthen the notion of Crete as birthplace of astronomical thought. Second, it will show the continuity of Greek civilization on an international scale; and it will create paths for a livable development for local societies. The Hill of Papoura must not be buried under a radar. It must shine like a pharos / lighthouse of memory, science and spirit.”

A circular pattern in a desert AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Top view of the circular tower of the stone mechanism of time, the Gate of Heaven near Knossos, within the airport of Herakleion, Crete. Photo: Ministry of Culture

I fully agree with Moussa. Modern Greece and primarily its scientists and scholars must love and protect their ancient heritage as soon as possible, otherwise foreigners will continue to steal and plunder Greek treasures and monuments. And besides this, disinterest in Greek culture becomes ethnonihilism and ethnocidal, which become betrayal, leading to enslavement and extinction.

Moussas knows what he is saying, and he says it with patriotic responsibility and the virtue of science. He is an astronomer who greatly helped the international study of the Antikythera Mechanism. His work inspired me, and I wrote my book about this huge and great feat of Greek astronomical science and technology, the astronomical Antikythera Mechanism / Meteoroskopeion.

Today’s scientists in Greece often face a state machine that is ethnonihilist. The professor at the University of the Aegean, Ioannis Lyrintzis, for example, gave us information[8] from his colleague, Marios Dionellis, about the Minoan treasure of Papoura Hill: “At dawn [on July 10, 2025],” according to Dionellis, “the civilization of Crete was captured. Not by persecuted immigrants. But by professors and educated archaeologists and by the Ministry of Culture itself and the Central Archaeological Council. With just one negative vote, the scientists (most of them archaeologists) voted in favor of the destruction of one of the most important Minoan monuments in Crete, the building located on Papoura Hill. This is done for the sake of the airport in Kastelli [near Knossos]. They voted to place two giant radars to the right and left of the monument at a distance of 20 meters, with heavy excavations in “the entire hill where the archaeological research has not yet been completed.”

The next day, July 11, 2025, Lyrintzis added that:

“Any other “imperative” work (of military or political importance) is carried out at a distance and with respect for the cultural heritage… Much can be done as long as there is will, science, prudence and patience.”

On July 11, 2025, Stavros Papamarinopoulos, professor at the University of Patras, wrote a letter with his concerns about the precious Minoan treasure of Papoura Hill. He said, among other things, that the supporters of the Papoura Hill include “three scientific societies, the Association of Archaeologists, the Hellenic Archaeometric Society and the EMAEM (SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ANCIENT GREEK MYTHOLOGY).

THEREFORE the opposition… is [from] hundreds of scientists of VARIOUS specialties.”

Epilogue

The warnings of Moussas, Dionellis, Lyrintzis and Papamarinopoulos about the “fall / capture” of Minoan Crete by corrupt bureaucrat archaeologists and the Ministry of “Culture” of Greece express the corruption in the country — now in 2025. Corruption reflects foreign influence and almost foreign occupation, mainly by EU, NATO, lenders and Turkey. Ethnonihilism is the enemy of Hellenism. It is a mirror of deep national divisions where Greeks hate themselves and the Greek civilization that gave light to humanity and especially to Europe. It embraces foreign influences, especially from America. Greek ethnonihilists in the government grab foreign ideology and make it the policy of the Greek government. For example, NATO and England and America in particular have for long time supported Turkey. This support embraces Greek policy makers, though its implications have had adverse effects on Greece. In fact, that US-UK support of Turkey resulted in the 1974 invasion and capture of north Cyprus by Turkey and, more than 50 years later, Turkey threatens Greece. It’s the same thing with Germany’s refusal to repay their almost 1 trillion euros debt to Greece, a debt from the atrocities and starvation Germans committed and imposed on Greece during 1941-1944. With the support of the United States, Germany has become the leader of the EU. And when in the first 2 decades of the 21st century, Greece dropped into the abyss of debt, the country was nearly crashed by the EU and America’s International Monetary Fund that handled the debt of Greece. EU and IMF treated Greece like an enemy, all the more boosting Germany’s determination to deny its obligations to Greece. And the ethnonihilist leaders of Greece go along with that humiliation. The least they could do is to stop paying their own debt to the EU-IMF.

Ethnonihilism kills. It connects the fear and often the hatred of the enemies of Greece (Germany and Turkey) with the Ephialtes traitorous nightmares of the ruling class in Greece. Treasures like the Gate of Heaven in Knossos, Crete, leave ethnonihilists cold.

The Gate of Heaven on the Minoan Hill of Papoura near Knossos in Crete is not only a stone time mechanism, a pharos / lighthouse of civilization. It resembles other ancient Greek institutions of civilization that enlightened the Greeks for centuries. It would be sacrilege and a grave national and international crime to destroy it for any reason whatsoever.

NOTES

1. Christos Doumas, “The Early Bronze Age (3000-1500 BC)” in History of Humanity: Scientific and Cultural Development, Vol. II, From the Third Millennium to the Seventh Century BC, edited by A.H. Dani and J.-P. Mohen (New York: Routledge, 1996) 147-148. 

2. “Keros: Unexpected archaeological finds in the heart of the Aegean,” Archaeology, January 26, 2021. 

3. Herodotos, The Histories 3.122; Plato, Laws 4.706a. 

4. Aristotle, Politics 1271b 32-40; Herodotos, The Histories 1.171. 

5. Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War 1.4, 8, 2-4. 

6. N. G. Wilson, Scholars of Byzantium (Cambridge, MA: The Medieval Academy of America, 1996), 154. 

7. Xenophon, Oeconomicos 5.6-14. 

8. My citations of Lyrintzis and other professors come from the Forum of the International Hellenic Association, IXA. 

Evaggelos Vallianatos, Ph.D., studied history and biology at the University of Illinois; earned his Ph.D. in Greek and European history at the University of Wisconsin; did postdoctoral studies in the history of science at Harvard. He worked on Capitol Hill and the US EPA; taught at several universities and authored several books, including The Antikythera Mechanism: The Story Behind the Genius of the Greek Computer and its Demise. He is the author of Freedom: Clear Thinking and Inspiration from 5,000 Years of Greek History (Universal Publishers, 2025).